A material weakness is a reportable condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control structure elements does not reduce to a relatively low level the ris
Trang 1A material weakness is a reportable condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control structure elements does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that would be material in relation to the primary government financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions
Our consideration of the internal control structure would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control structure that might be reportable conditions and, accordingly, would not necessarily disclose all reportable conditions that are also considered to be material weaknesses as defined above However, we believe none of the reportable conditions described in the accompanying "Schedule of Auditor's Findings and
Recommendations" are material weaknesses
This report is intended for the use of the management This is not intended to limit the distribution of this report, which is a matter of public record
WILLIAM S JONES, CPA Director, Department of Audit
Trang 2OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR
STEVEN A PATTERSON
AUDITOR
31
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S SINGLE AUDIT REPORT ON THE INTERNAL CONTROL STRUCTURE
USED IN ADMINISTERING FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
April 9, 1996 Members of the Board of Supervisors
Benton County, Mississippi
We have audited the primary government financial statements of Benton County, Mississippi, as of and for the year ended September 30, 1995, and have issued our report thereon dated April 9, 1996 The Independent Auditor's Report on the primary government financial statements is qualified because the primary government financial statements do not include the financial data of component units, which should be included in order to conform with generally accepted accounting principles
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards; Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-128, Audits of State and Local Governments Those standards and OMB Circular A-128 require that
we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the primary government financial statements are free of material misstatement
In planning and performing our audit for the year ended September 30, 1995, we considered the county's internal control structure in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion
on the county's primary government financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control structure This report addresses our consideration of internal control structure policies and procedures relevant to compliance with requirements applicable to federal financial assistance programs We have addressed policies and procedures relevant to our audit of the primary government financial statements in a separate report dated
April 9, 1996
The management of Benton County, Mississippi, is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of internal control structure policies and procedures The objectives
of an internal control structure are to provide management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition, that transactions are executed in accordance with management's authorization and recorded properly to permit the preparation of primary government financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that federal financial assistance programs are managed in compliance with applicable laws and regulations Because of inherent limitations in any internal control structure, errors, irregularities or instances of noncompliance may nevertheless occur and not be detected Also, projection of any evaluation of the structure to future periods is subject to the risk that procedures may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation of policies and procedures may deteriorate
Trang 3For the purpose of this report, we have classified the significant internal control structure policies and procedures used in administering its federal financial assistance programs in the following categories:
General Requirements
Political Activity Davis-Bacon Act Civil Rights Cash Management Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Administrative Requirements Specific Requirements
Types of Services Special Requirements Claims for Advances and Reimbursements
For all of the internal control structure categories listed above, we obtained an understanding of the design
of relevant policies and procedures and determined whether they have been placed in operation, and we assessed control risk
During the year ended September 30, 1995, Benton County, Mississippi, had no major federal financial assistance programs and expended 99 percent of its total federal financial assistance under the following nonmajor federal financial assistance program: Community development block grant
We performed tests of controls, as required by OMB Circular A-128, to evaluate the effectiveness of the design and operation of internal control structure policies and procedures that we considered relevant to preventing
or detecting material noncompliance with specific requirements, general requirements and requirements governing claims for advances and reimbursements that are applicable to the aforementioned nonmajor federal financial assistance program Our procedures were less in scope than would be necessary to render an opinion on these internal control structure policies and procedures Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion
Our consideration of the internal control structure would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control structure that might be material weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control structure elements does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that noncompliance with laws and regulations that would be material to a federal financial assistance program may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions We noted no matters involving the internal control structure and its operation that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above
Trang 4This report is intended for the use of the management, the cognizant agency and the appropriate grantor agencies This is not intended to limit the distribution of this report, which is a matter of public record
WILLIAM S JONES, CPA Director, Department of Audit
Trang 5BENTON COUNTY
(This page left blank intentionally)
Trang 6OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR
STEVEN A PATTERSON
AUDITOR
35
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON CENTRAL PURCHASING SYSTEM
AND PURCHASE CLERK SCHEDULES (REQUIRED BY SECTION 31-7-115, MISS CODE ANN (1972))
April 9, 1996 Members of the Board of Supervisors
Benton County, Mississippi
We have made a study and evaluation of the central purchasing system of Benton County, Mississippi, as
of and for the year ended September 30, 1995 Our study and evaluation included tests of compliance of the Purchase Clerk records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances
The Board of Supervisors of Benton County, Mississippi, is responsible for establishing and maintaining a central purchasing system in accordance with Sections 31-7-101 through 31-7-127, Miss Code Ann (1972) In addition, the Board of Supervisors is responsible for purchasing in accordance with the bid requirements of Section 31-7-13, Miss Code Ann (1972) The Board of Supervisors of Benton County, Mississippi, has established centralized purchasing for all funds of the county and has established an inventory control system The objective of the central purchasing system is to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that purchases are executed in accordance with state law
Because of inherent limitations in any central purchasing system, errors or irregularities may occur and not be detected Also, projection of any evaluation of the system to future periods is subject to the risk that
procedures may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the procedures may deteriorate
The results of our audit procedures disclosed certain immaterial instances of noncompliance with the aforementioned code sections These instances of noncompliance are described in the accompanying "Schedule of Auditor's Findings and Recommendations" and were also considered in forming our opinion on compliance, which
is expressed below
In our opinion, except for the noncompliance referred to above, Benton County, Mississippi, complied, in all material respects, with state laws governing central purchasing and bid requirements
The accompanying schedules of (1) purchases not made from the lowest bidder, (2) emergency purchases and (3) purchases made noncompetitively from a sole source are presented in accordance with Section 31-7-115, Miss Code Ann (1972) The information contained on these schedules has been subjected to procedures
performed in connection with our aforementioned study and evaluation of the purchasing system and, in our opinion, is fairly presented when considered in relation to that study and evaluation
Trang 7This report is intended for use in evaluating the central purchasing system of Benton County, Mississippi, and should not be relied upon for any other purpose This is not intended to limit the distribution of the report, which is a matter of public record
WILLIAM S JONES, CPA Director, Department of Audit
Trang 8Schedule of Purchases Made From Other Than the Lowest Bidder
For the Year Ended September 30, 1995
Our test results did not identify any purchases from other than the lowest bidder
Trang 9Schedule of Emergency Purchases
For the Year Ended September 30, 1995
12-15-94 Courthouse heaters $ 4,831 Rowland Heating The heating unit was in danger of
and Air exploding from damage to the
inside core of the heating unit.
Trang 10Schedule of Purchases Made Noncompetitively From a Sole Source
For the Year Ended September 30, 1995
Trang 11BENTON COUNTY
(This page left blank intentionally)