Open Access Case report Difficulty in diagnosing the pathological nature of an acute fracture of the clavicle: a case report Address: 1 Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Watford Gene
Trang 1Open Access
Case report
Difficulty in diagnosing the pathological nature of an acute fracture
of the clavicle: a case report
Address: 1 Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Watford General Hospital, West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, UK, 2 Department
of Medicine, Watford General Hospital, West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, UK and 3 Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Barnet General Hospital, Barnet & Chase Farm Hospitals NHS Trust, Barnet, UK
Email: Sheraz S Malik* - smalik888@gmail.com; Saiqah Azad - saiqahazad@yahoo.co.uk; Shahbaz Malik - shahb.malik@gmail.com;
Caroline B Hing - caroline.hing@whht.nhs.uk
* Corresponding author
Abstract
Fractures of the clavicle comprise between 5% to10% of all fractures Medial clavicular fractures
are uncommon and are normally caused by high-energy trauma A low impact mechanism of injury
should raise suspicion of a pathological fracture, but this case report highlights the difficulty in
diagnosing the pathological nature of an acute fracture of the clavicle We describe a patient who
presented with a medial clavicular fracture after a simple fall but the fracture was diagnosed as
pathological in retrospect four months after the initial presentation We would also like to
emphasise that the medial clavicle is the most frequent site of pathological fractures of the clavicle,
and the possibility of an underlying pathological condition should be considered whenever a patient
with a medial clavicular fracture is encountered
Background
The incidence of clavicular fractures in adults is 30 per 100,
000 population per year [1] and these are one of the most
commonly encountered fractures in the accident &
emer-gency (A&E) department and orthopaedic practice [2] Most
clavicular fractures are caused by a fall or direct trauma to the
shoulder The clavicle is vulnerable to pathological fractures
from several causes such as neoplasm, infection and
meta-bolic bone disease [3] We describe a patient who presented
with a medial clavicular fracture after a trivial activity, but the
fracture was diagnosed as pathological in retrospect four
months after the initial presentation To the best of our
knowledge, the delay that can occur between the first
presen-tation of an acute clavicular fracture and recognition that it is
in fact pathological has not been specifically highlighted
pre-viously in the literature
Case presentation
Case report
A 67-year old woman presented to the A&E department complaining of pain in her left shoulder and clavicle that started whilst lifting a flowerpot in the garden She also recalled having fallen from a stepladder a few days before but denied any apparent injury resulting from this On examination, there was swelling and tenderness over the medial aspect of the left clavicle, and no associated neu-rovascular deficit The rest of the shoulder examination was normal A plain radiograph of her left shoulder revealed an undisplaced fracture of the medial clavicle (figure 1) She was placed in a broad arm sling and dis-charged from the A&E department with a follow-up appointment in the fracture clinic
Published: 25 June 2009
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2009, 4:21 doi:10.1186/1749-799X-4-21
Received: 10 May 2009 Accepted: 25 June 2009 This article is available from: http://www.josr-online.com/content/4/1/21
© 2009 Malik et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Trang 2One week later, the patient was reviewed in the fracture
clinic by an orthopaedic registrar who attributed the pain,
swelling and the fracture of the clavicle to the mechanism
of injury and advised follow-up in one month's time
The patient failed to attend the follow-up appointment
and was discharged from the clinic because of
non-attend-ance Four months later the patient was referred by the GP
to the orthopaedic clinic with an enlarging lump over the
fracture site In the clinic she was systemically well with no
concerning symptoms other than an enlarging swelling at
the fracture site She gave a past medical history of
hyper-tension, a left mastectomy for breast cancer eight years
ago, and admitted to smoking for many years On
exami-nation there was a large, mildly tender bony lump at the
fracture site, and a repeat radiograph of the left shoulder
revealed a large lytic lesion over the medial aspect of the
clavicle (figure 2) This was considered malignant and
urgently investigated further A computed tomography
(CT) scan of the thorax, abdomen and pelvis revealed a
right renal tumour with metastases to the lungs, liver and
bone The bone metastases were to the left clavicle and the
right ilium A further two-phase
technetium-99m-methyl-ene diphosphonate (Tc99M MDP) bone scan confirmed only two bone metastases (figure 3), and an open biopsy
of the clavicle revealed a metastatic renal cell carcinoma The patient was referred to a medical oncologist for fur-ther staging and treatment
Discussion
Medial clavicular fractures are the least common of clavic-ular fractures, comprising between 2% to 10% of all cla-vicular fractures [1,4,5] Postacchini et al found that the incidence of medial clavicular fractures increases in the elderly, comprising 2% of clavicular fractures in 18–30 years age group and 10% of clavicular fractures in 61–80 years age groups [4] All clavicular fractures are more com-mon in men, and in Robin's case series of 1000 clavicular fractures the male to female ratio for medial clavicular fracture was 3.7:1 [1] Acute medial clavicular fractures are commonly caused by high-energy trauma and are associ-ated with other multisystem injuries [5]
Renal cell carcinoma accounts for 2% of all malignancies
Up to a third of patients with renal cell carcinoma develop bone metastases [6], most of which are lytic and predom-inantly affect the axial skeleton [7] Clavicular metastases comprise 6–18% of all bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma [6-8] Swanson et al found that the symptoms secondary to bone metastases were the presenting com-plaint that subsequently led to a diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma in 121 of 252 (48%) patients [8] In their study, 37 patients presented with a pathological fracture and an additional 34 patients experienced a pathological fracture in the course of the disease
Plain radiograph of the left shoulder at the first presentation
Figure 1
Plain radiograph of the left shoulder at the first
pres-entation The radiograph demonstrates a medial clavicular
fracture (arrow) that was later diagnosed as pathological
Plain radiograph of the left shoulder taken 4 months later
Figure 2
Plain radiograph of the left shoulder taken 4 months
later The radiograph demonstrates a large lytic lesion
(arrow) over the medial aspect of the clavicle
A Tc99M MDP Bone Scan
Figure 3
A Tc99M MDP Bone Scan The bone scan demonstrates
bone metastases to the left medial clavicle and the right ilium (arrows)
Trang 3The medial clavicle is the most frequent site of
pathologi-cal fractures in the clavicle [3] A pathologipathologi-cal fracture
occurs in a bone that is not normal [9] Failure to
recog-nise and appropriately treat a pathological fracture and
the associated underlying condition can be detrimental to
the patient's life or the affected limb [9] This case report
demonstrates the difficulty in diagnosing a pathological
fracture of the clavicle The patient in this case was treated
for a primary non-pathological fracture of the clavicle and
the proper diagnosis was made four months after the
patient's initial presentation Clinicians are alert to
sus-pecting a pathological fracture in unusual circumstances
of injury in bones such as vertebrae and long bones of the
limbs However, clavicular fractures are common in all
age groups and occur due to various types of injury and
variable-energy trauma These fractures are not routinely
suspected to be pathological, unless associated with
obvi-ous clinical or radiological features of an underlying
dis-ease Therefore clavicular fractures are not routinely
investigated for an underlying pathological condition
This can result in a considerable time lag between the first
presentation of the clavicular fracture and recognition that
it is in fact pathological Furthermore, an unclear history
or a history of multiple accidents e.g falls, can confound
the actual cause of the fracture In the patient that we
described the fracture was attributed to the old fall but she
in fact had an atraumatic pathological fracture of the
clav-icle
Adeyemo et al described a similar case where a 73 year old
man was seen in A&E and then followed up in a fracture
clinic for a left medial clavicular fracture after a fall on to
the left shoulder [10] Six weeks after the first presentation
he was found to have clinical and radiological signs of
"huge callus formation" at the fracture site, and was given
a 3-month follow up appointment He was admitted to
hospital with obstructive jaundice before this, and at his
follow up appointment he was found to have a clavicle
swelling the size of an orange and complete radiological
destruction of the medial clavicle A diagnosis of
underly-ing metastatic bronchogenic carcinoma was later
estab-lished It was after over 4 months since first presentation
that the pathological nature of the clavicular fracture was
appreciated in retrospect
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the
delay that can be associated with diagnosing the
patho-logical nature of an acute clavicular fracture has been
spe-cifically brought to light Adeyemo et al put this delay
down to the "compartmentalised" treatment that their
patient received from multiple health care professionals
[10], but it is now emerging that this could be a feature
common to acute pathological clavicular fractures as a
group Of course, many such fractures are diagnosed
promptly, and may not necessarily be reported in the
lit-erature However the delay that can occur is a significant one, four months or more in the two cases discussed above, and this has been highlighted with the aim of rais-ing awareness in all cases
A high index of suspicion is required to consider a clavic-ular fracture as pathological For this reason, a full medi-cal history should always be taken at the time of assessing
a patient with a fracture Information such as past medical history of carcinoma can raise a high index of suspicion of
a pathological fracture Other features in the history that could suggest a pathological fracture include a patient above the age of 45 years, multiple recent fractures or pain
at the site before the fracture [9] Such patients should also have a thorough physical examination of the upper limbs, the rest of the skeletal system to check for other affected sites, and a general examination of possible primary sites such as breast, prostate, thyroid and lymph nodes for lym-phoma [9]
The clinical finding would direct further urgent investiga-tions, and may include further imaging of the clavicle with cone views and upper rib radiographs or a CT scan to ade-quately delineate the fracture and the quality of the sur-rounding bone [11] Adjunct investigations include laboratory studies such as full blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, bone profile, prostate-specific anti-gen, immunoelectrophoresis and alkaline phosphatase, urine analysis for Bence-Jones proteins, CT scan of the thorax, abdomen and pelvis, total body bone/positron emission tomography (PET) scan and biopsy of the frac-ture site and/or the primary site if appropriate [9]
It is important that patients with a suspected pathological clavicular fracture are discussed in a multi-disciplinary set-ting and reviewed for features of radiographic union, unlike the patient that we described, who was discharged after failing to attend an appointment
Conclusion
We would like to emphasize that all patients should be carefully assessed on an individual basis, including those who present with apparently common simple injuries We would also like to highlight that medial clavicular frac-tures are separate from other clavicular fracfrac-tures because these are uncommon, normally associated with high-energy trauma and occur where pathological fractures in the clavicle are most common Therefore, the possibility
of an underlying pathological condition should be con-sidered whenever a patient with a medial clavicular frac-ture is encountered
Consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying
Trang 4Publish with Bio Med Central and every scientist can read your work free of charge
"BioMed Central will be the most significant development for disseminating the results of biomedical researc h in our lifetime."
Sir Paul Nurse, Cancer Research UK Your research papers will be:
available free of charge to the entire biomedical community peer reviewed and published immediately upon acceptance cited in PubMed and archived on PubMed Central yours — you keep the copyright
Submit your manuscript here:
http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/publishing_adv.asp
Bio Medcentral
images A copy of the written consent is available for
review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests
Authors' contributions
SSM conceived the idea and wrote the paper
SA and SM analysed the notes and contributed to the
dis-cussion
CBH was responsible for editing and approving the final
manuscript
All authors read and approved the final manuscript
References
1. Robinson CM: Fractures of the clavicle in the adult
Epidemi-ology and classification J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998, 80:476-84.
2. Kim W, McKee MD: Management of acute clavicle fractures.
Orthop Clin North Am 2008, 39:491-505.
3. Lazarus MD, Seon C: Fractures of the clavicle In Rockwood and
Green's fractures in adults 6th edition Edited by: Bucholz RW, et al.
Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006:1211-1256
4. Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F: Epidemiology of
clav-icle fractures J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002, 11:452-6.
5. Throckmorton T, Kuhn JE: Fractures of the medial end of the
clavicle J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007, 16:49-54.
6. Zekri J, Ahmed N, Coleman RE, Hancock BW: The skeletal
meta-static complications of renal cell carcinoma Int J Oncol 2001,
19:379-82.
7. Swanson DA, Orovan WL, Johnson DE, Giacco G: Osseous
metas-tases secondary to renal cell carcinoma Urology 1981,
18:556-61.
8. Buzaid AC, Todd MB: Therapeutic options in renal cell
carci-noma Semin Oncol 1989, 16(1 Suppl 1):12-9.
9. Weber KL: Pathological fractures In Rockwood and Green's
frac-tures in adults 6th edition Edited by: Bucholz RW, et al Philadelphia,
PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006:643-666
10. Adeyemo f, Babu L, Suneja R, Ellis D: Pathological fracture of the
clavicle: a case report of an unusual presentation J Bone Joint
Surg Br 2005, 88-B(SUPP_II):302.
11. Simon RR, Sherman SC, Koenigsknecht SJ: Emergency
Orthopae-dics – The extremities 5th edition Chicago, IL: The McGraw-Hill
Companies; 2007:285-287