1. Trang chủ
  2. » Y Tế - Sức Khỏe

1 fracture related infection where are we now

28 1 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề Fracture – Related Infection Where Are We Now?
Tác giả Do Phuoc Hung
Người hướng dẫn Assoc. Prof. Do Phuoc Hung
Trường học University of Medicine & Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
Chuyên ngành Orthopaedics and Rehabilitations
Thể loại Bài báo
Năm xuất bản 2023
Thành phố Ho Chi Minh City
Định dạng
Số trang 28
Dung lượng 4,48 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Surgical Site Infection CDCSurgical site infection = infection of the incision / organ / space that occur after surgery 5 Source: CDC – National Healthcare Safety Network NHSN 2023... C

Trang 1

INTERDISCIPLINARY CME CONGRESS

Ho Chi Minh City, September 16th, 2023

UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE & PHARMACY AT HO CHI MINH CITY

Fracture – Related Infection

Where are we now?

Do Phuoc Hung, M.D, Assoc.Prof.

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitations

Trang 2

Why are we here? What’s the matter?!

2

Trang 3

How significant is definition of FRI?

• Accurate diagnosis: critical for preventing poor outcomes

• Limitations with gold standards: further complicate diagnosis and management process

3

Trang 4

Which condition does

‘Fracture – Related Infection’ (FRI)

most likely refer to?

A Surgical Site Infection (SSI)

B Infected Nonunion/Septic Nonunion

C Infection After Fracture Fixation

D Posttraumatic Osteomyelitis

4

Trang 5

Surgical Site Infection (CDC)

Surgical site infection = infection of the incision / organ / space

that occur after surgery

5

Source: CDC – National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) 2023

Trang 6

Diagnostic Criteria – SSI

6

NHSN orthopedic procedure

only ORIF

• > 90 days?

• Other procedures than ORIF? No surgery?

Source: CDC – National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) 2023

Trang 8

“ a more comprehensive term encompassed infections with and without implants

& included infection of all parts of the bone (cortical, medullary, epiphyseal).”

– Haematogenous infection arising after fx healing (?)

Source: Metsemakers et al Injury 2018;49(3):505-510 McNally et al EFORT Open Rev 2020;5(10):614–619

Trang 9

Case presentation

• Male, 23 years old

• ORIF right proximal humerus fx 6 months ago

• Swelling, warm, redness, painful scar for 1 month,

unconfirmed purulent drainage, fever (-)

• Exam: tenderness (+), restricted shoulder ROM

• WBC 8.32 G/L, Neu 58.7%, CRP 13.1 mg/L

Can FRI be diagnosed at this time?

9

Trang 10

Clinical Diagnosis – FRI

Note: presence of pathogens via

culture is NOT an absolute

requirement, esp in chronic

antibiotic-use cases

Source: Govaert et al J Orthop Trauma 2020;34:8-17

Trang 11

Case presentation

• Male, 23 years old

• ORIF right proximal humerus fx 6 months ago

• Swelling, warm, redness, painful scar for 1 month,

unconfirmed purulent drainage, fever (-)

• Exam: tenderness (+), restricted shoulder ROM

• WBC 8.32 G/L, Neu 58.7%, CRP 13.1 mg/L

11

How can we confirmed the communication

between the infection & fracture/implant?

Aspiration? Operation? or Else?

Trang 12

Clinical Diagnosis – FRI

12

Clinical signs

Local: swelling /  temperature /

redness / pain (without weight

bearing,  over time, new)

Persistent /  / new wound

drainage (beyond first few days

postop, without explanation)

New joint effusion in fracture

patients (implant penetrates joint

capsule / intra-articular fractures)

Systemic: fever (≥ 38.3 o C)

Suggestive Criteria ≥ 1

Source: Govaert et al J Orthop Trauma 2020;34:8-17

Swelling 2m after ORIF femur fx

Swelling 2m after ORIF patella fx New discharge 2 wks

after ORIF tibia fx

Trang 13

Clinical Diagnosis – FRI

13

Laboratory signs

Only in case of secondary rise

(after initial decrease) or

consistent elevation over time

AND after exclusion other infectious focci or inflammation processes

Insufficient to confirm or rule out Cautious when interpreting results

Source: Govaert et al J Orthop Trauma 2020;34:8-17 van den Kieboom et al Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1542-1550

Trang 14

Clinical Diagnosis – FRI

Sequestration (occurring over time)

Failure of progression of bone

healing (non-union)

Periosteal bone formation (≠

fracture site / in case of a

Trang 15

Come back to the case

• Male, 23 years old

• ORIF right proximal humerus fx 6 months ago

• Swelling, warm, redness, painful scar for 1 month,

unconfirmed purulent drainage, fever (-)

• Exam: tenderness (+), restricted shoulder ROM

Trang 16

Diagnostic Flowchart

16

Source: Govaert et al J Orthop Trauma 2020;34:8-17

Trang 17

Post-op Diagnosis – FRI

neutrophils via high-power field (Govaert et al, 2020)

Preferably 5 samples:

• Ideally from implant – bone interface

• Avoid superficial, skin, or sinus tract samples

• By separate clean, unused instruments

• ‘No touch’ the skin

• Put in separate pieces of gauze

• Transferred in separate containers

Source: Govaert et al J Orthop Trauma 2020;34:8-17

Trang 18

Post-op Diagnosis – FRI

Only in chronic / late-onset cases (nonunion)

Source: Govaert et al J Orthop Trauma 2020;34:8-17 Morgenstern et al Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:966–972

Trang 19

Post-op Diagnosis – FRI

Culture: pathogenic organism from

a single deep tissue / implant

specimen

Suggestive Criteria

Source: Govaert et al J Orthop Trauma 2020;34:8-17

Trang 20

The patient underwent surgery

20

Trang 21

Source: Onsea et al Injury 2022;53(6):1867-1879

Trang 22

Timing Classification of IAFF

22

• Early (< 2 weeks):

– Highly virulent organism

– Biofilm: may ‘immature’

– Bone: ‘inflammatory’ or ‘soft callus’

• Delayed (2 – 10 weeks):

– Less virulent organism

– Biofilm: ‘mature’, more resistant

– Bone: ‘hard callus’

• Late (> 10 weeks):

– Low virulent organism

– Periosteal new bone formation,

involucrum

Source: Metsemakers et al Injury 2018;49(3):511-522

Trang 23

Classification of Osteomyelitis

23

• 12 clinical stages

• Guide treatment strategies

• NO correlate with prognosis

• NO reference to soft tissue coverage & microbiology

Source: Cierny et al Chin Orthop Relat Res 2003;414:7-24

Trang 24

The new BACH Classification

24

• High reproducibility

• Can be applied accurately

by users with a variety of clinical backgrounds

• Need further evaluation for prognosis & management

Source: Hotchen et al Bone Joint Res 2019;8(10):459-468

Trang 25

The Joint-Specific BACH classification

Trang 26

Everything is not perfect !

26

• Lack of evidence regarding value &

validity of parameters for diagnostic

criteria

• Definition based on consensus of

small group of experts

However, the definition:

• Offers opportunity to standardize clinical reports &  quality of published literature

• Leads to a standardized clinical approach toward diagnostic workup of patients

with suspected FRI

Meeting of 35 experts on diagnosis for FRI in 2018

(AO Foundation)

Source: Govaert et al J Orthop Trauma 2020;34:8-17

Trang 27

FUTURE DIRECTIONS FOR CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY FRI DIAGNOSTICS

• Optimized culture techniques

• Molecular diagnostics

27

Trang 28

Take–home messages

28

• Fracture – Related Infections = all infections occur in the

presence of a fracture

• FRI diagnosis is a step-wise approach, based on

confirmatory criteria & suggestive criteria

• FRI classification should involve the timing, extent of bone

involvement, host status, microbiology & soft tissue coverage

Ngày đăng: 03/10/2023, 16:03

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm

w