3/2 Street, Ninh Kieu District, Can Tho City, Viet Nam The present study evaluates the surface water quality in the canals of An Giang province in the period from 2009 to 2016.. This s
Trang 1* Corresponding author http://dx.doi.org/10.13141/JVE
R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E
Surface water quality in canals in An Giang province, Viet Nam, from 2009 to 2016
Chất lượng nước mặt ở các kênh rạch nội đồng tỉnh An Giang, Việt Nam, giai đoạn 2009 đến
2016
N G U Y E N , H o n g T h a o L y * ; N G U Y E N , T h a n h G i a o
Department of Environmental Management, College of Environment and Natural Resources, Can Tho University 3/2 Street, Ninh Kieu District, Can Tho City, Viet Nam
The present study evaluates the surface water quality in the canals of An Giang province in the period from 2009 to
2016 The results showed that surface water of the canals was contaminated by organic matter and microorganisms which makes it not suitable for water supply and conservation of aquatic life The water quality parameters such as dissolved oxygen (DO), biological oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS), orthophosphate (P-PO 43-) and coliforms levels in the wet season were found to be higher than those in the dry season The problem of organic and microorganic pollution over a long period of time without solutions leads to declines in water quality and then quantity
as well Agriculture is the main activity contributing to pollution of surface water in interior canals along with the activities
of daily life, industry and services This causes pollution of the surface water on Hau River due to its exchange of water with the connected canals Good agricultural practices should be implemented to limit the pollution of surface water resources of the Mekong Delta
Nghiên cứu này nhằm đánh giá diễn biến chất lượng nước mặt trong các kênh rạch nội đồng của tỉnh An Giang trong giai đoạn 2009 – 2016 Kết quả cho thấy nước mặt tại các kênh rạch nội đồng đã ô nhiễm hữu cơ và vi sinh vật Nguồn nước không phù hợp cho mục đích cấp nước sinh hoạt và bảo tồn thực vật thủy sinh Các chỉ tiêu như hàm lượng oxy hòa tan (DO), nhu cầu oxy sinh hóa (BOD), tổng chất rắn lơ lửng (TSS), orthophosphate (P-PO 4 3- ) và coliforms trong mùa mưa cao hơn mùa khô Vấn đề ô nhiễm hữu cơ và vi sinh vật diễn ra trong thời gian dài và chưa có giải pháp xử lý làm cho chất lượng nước suy giảm dẫn đến suy giảm về trữ lượng Nông nghiệp là hoạt động chính góp phần làm ô nhiễm nguồn nước mặt trong các kênh rạch nội đồng bên cạnh các hoạt động sinh hoạt, công nghiệp và dịch vụ Điều này dẫn đến nước mặt trên sông Hậu cũng có đặt tính ô nhiễm tương tự do trao đổi nước với các kênh rạch nội đồng Thực hành sản xuất nông nghiệp thân thiện môi trường cần sớm được triển khai để hạn chế ô nhiễm nguồn nước mặt quan trọng của khu vực đồng bằng sông Cửu Long
Keywords: coliforms; dissolved oxygen concentration; in-field canals; surface water quality; suspended solids
1 Introduction
An Giang is an upstream province of the Lower Mekong
River System and one of the four key economic regions of
Viet Nam It has a unique hydrological regime and closely
relies on Mekong river water regime with two major rivers:
Tien river (80-km long) and Hau river (100-km long) The
system of rivers and canals of the province has 280 routes
with a general density of about 0.72 km/km2, creating
fa-vorable conditions for the development of agricultural,
in-dustrial and service economy In 2012, the agricultural
pro-duction value of the province was over VND 8,000 billion
and tends to increase over years (up to 2.3% compared to
that of 2011) (An Giang People’s Committee, 2015)
Aver-age GDP growth rate was 8.63% (period 2011-2015) (An
Giang People’s Committee, 2015) Along with the
socio-economic development, water pollution has been in-creased In agricultural production, due to abuse of plant protection chemicals or pesticides, polluted water sources
in canals and ditches affect human health and environ-ment In aquaculture, due to mass farming, lack of plan-ning, inappropriate following the technical processes, along with the large amount of feed used and improper feeding also causes contamination of water environment Industrial zones are still in the development stage, facto-ries and production facilities are still scattered and not concentrated in the industrial zones As a result, untreated
or improperly treated waste is one of the causes of water pollution in the rivers In addition, domestic wastewater from rural to urban areas has not been planned for wastewater collection and treatment systems or the in-vestment in construction of hydroelectric dams in the
Trang 2up-stream also contributes to a great impact on quality of
sur-face water sources of the area Field canals in An Giang
province are directly affected by socio-economic
develop-ment activities such as traditional villages and poor
agricul-tural practices This study aims to evaluate long-term
sur-face water quality in the field canals in comparison with
Hau river over eight-year period (2009-2016) to find out
common and specific pollutants in some canals and river
in An Giang province
2 Research methodology
Monitoring data of eight years (2009-2016) on water
qual-ity in Hau river and field canals including pH, temperature,
total suspended solids (TSS), dissolved oxygen (DO),
bio-chemical oxygen demand (BOD), nitrogen nitrate (NO3--N),
orthophosphate (PO43--P), and coliforms were provided by
An Giang Department of Natural Resources and
Environ-ment at 20 sampling locations which were shown in Figure
1 (see coordinates of the sampling locations in Table 1)
The period of 2009-2016 was selected since the water
quality parameters were regularly monitored three times
per year (March, June, and September) The difference in
mean values between the surface water quality
parame-ters at the sampling sites was analyzed by one-way ANOVA
using IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 20.0 (IBM
Corp., 2011); Duncan was used to compare the difference
in surface water quality parameters at a significance level
of 5% (p <0.05) (Ahrari et al., 2015) Surface water quality
parameters in the studied areas were compared with the
National Technical Regulation on Surface Water Quality
(QCVN 08-MT: 2015/ BTNMT)
Figure 1 Locations of sampling sites of field canals and Hau
river ND1 belongs to Chau Doc town; ND2, ND3, and ND6
belong to Tinh Bien district; ND4, ND7, ND10, ND11 and
ND12 belong to Tri Ton district; ND5 belong to Chau Phu
dis-trict; ND8, ND9, ND14 belongs to Chau Thanh disdis-trict; ND13
belongs to Long Xuyen city; ND15 belongs to Thoai Son
dis-trict; ND18, ND19, ND20 belong to Cho Moi disdis-trict;
MH2-MH6 belong to Hau River
Table 1 Sampling sites of field canals and Hau river
1 ND1 10°42'57.4"N 105°06'37.1"E
2 ND2 10°39'28.3"N 105°00'49.8"E
3 ND3 10°36'17.7"N 104°56'35.4"E
4 ND4 10°30'21.3"N 104°46'56.5"E
5 ND5 10°37'07.1"N 105°12'39.0"E
6 ND6 10°29'17.3"N 105°05'54.6"E
7 ND7 10°21'01.0"N 105°02'18.5"E
8 ND8 10°27'35.6"N 105°17'29.4"E
9 ND9 10°26'31.1"N 105°10'07.6"E
10 ND10 10°25'52.8"N 104°59'57.9"E
11 ND11 10°24'52.4"N 104°54'35.0"E
12 ND12 10°21'20.3"N 104°51'54.3"E
13 ND13 10°23'26.6"N 105°25'42.8"E
14 ND14 10°21'13.0"N 105°18'54.0"E
15 ND15 10°11'01.2"N 105°12'21.5"E
16 ND16 10°18'04.5"N 105°24'55.1"E
17 ND17 10°16'29.6"N 105°21'06.8"E
18 ND18 10°33'00.5"N 105°23'34.7"E
19 ND19 10°29'00.8"N 105°27'34.4"E
20 ND20 10°26'47.1"N 105°26'40.2"E
21 MH1 10°53'47.3"N 105°02'15.8"E
22 MH2 10°47'48.6"N 105°03'55.4"E
23 MH3 10°42'39.6"N 105°07'25.0"E
24 MH4 10°37'20.7"N 105°12'46.3"E
25 MH5 10°32'27.6"N 105°19'37.0"E
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Temperature Water temperature in the field canals ranged from 28.1 to 31.3°C, the highest temperature was found in Long Xuyen area (31.3 ± 2.0°C in 2010) and the lowest was in Chau Doc area (28.1 ± 0.9 °C in 2014) The water temperature in Hau River ranged from 27.7 to 31.6°C, the highest temperature was in 2009 (31.0 ± 1.0°C) and the lowest in 2015 (28.7 ± 1.9°C) Water temperatures in the dry season were in the range of 29.5-30.6°C which were higher than those in the rainy season (28.6-29.7°C) (Figure 2) Average temperature was lowest in Cho Moi area (28.6°C) and the highest in Hau river (30.6°C) The temperature difference between Hau river and the field canals in An Giang province during rainy season and dry season was approximate 2.1°C Average water temperature over years in the field canals and Hau River (Figure 3) showed that the temperature fluctuated between 29-30°C, averaged at 29.7 ± 0.7°C There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in temperatures among Chau Phu and Tri Ton, Chau Thanh, Long Xuyen, Thoai Son, and Hau river (Figure 3)
Trang 3Figure 2 Seasonal and spatial fluctuation of water
tempera-ture from 2009 to 2016 (mean values)
Generally, the temperature fluctuation in the canals was
small and was in accordance with the temperature of the
region since water has the function of regulating the
tem-perature, especially in the large and depth canals or rivers
(Hoc, 2011) This temperature range of the river and canals
is favorable for aquatic life (Phu and Ut, 2006)
Figure 3 The mean temperatures at different sampling sites
over the period of 2009-2016 The different letters indicate
statistically significantly different at α = 5%
3.2 pH values
It was found that pH values in the dry season and rainy
season at all sites ranged from 6.9 to 7.1, indicating a very
small seasonal and spatial fluctuation over the period of
eight years (Figure 4)
Figure 4 Seasonal and spatial fluctuation of pH of water
from 2009 to 2016
As indicated in Figure 5, the mean pH values over the years
in the study areas varied from 6.7 to 7.1, with an average
value of 7.0 ± 0.2 The pH value in Tri Ton area was signifi-cantly different from that of Chau Doc, Chau Phu, Long Xuyen, Thoai Son and Hau river (p < 0.05) The pH of the canals was in line with the one regulated in the National Technical Standard on Surface Water Quality (QCVN 08-MT: 2015/BTNMT)
Figure 5 The mean pH at different sampling sites over the period of 2009-2016 The different letters indicate statisti-cally significantly different at α = 5%
3.3 Total suspended solids Total suspended solids (TSS) in the field canals tended to increase over time and exceeded the limit allowed under QCVN 08-MT: 2015/BTNMT In all surveyed sites, TSS ranged from 25.0 to 93.7 mg/L in which the lowest concen-tration (25.0 ± 11.5 mg/L) was found in 2011 and the high-est concentration (93.7 ± 28.3 mg/L) was measured in Tri Ton in 2015 The lowest and highest concentrations ex-ceeded permissible standard by 1.25 and 4.7 times, re-spectively The concentration of TSS in Hau River ranged from 40.1-68.0 mg/L, which exceeded the allowed stand-ard from 2 to 3.4 times
Figure 6 The trend TSS from 2009 to 2016 The yearly aver-age of TSS was calculated from the data of three months in-cluding March, June and September
It can be seen from Figure 6 that TSS values of the canals (smaller rivers) tended to be higher than those in Hau River (large river) The difference could possibly be caused by the difference in flow rate and water volume between the small and large rivers In addition, these field canals also directly
20
25
30
35
Chau
Doc
Tinh
Bien
Tri Ton Chau Phu
Chau Thanh
Long Xuyen
Thoai Son
Cho Moi
Hau river
Sampling sites
27
28
29
30
31
32
Chau
Doc Tinh Bien Tri Ton Chau Phu ThanhChau XuyenLong Thoai Son Cho Moi riverHau
Sampling sites
5
6
7
8
9
Chau
Doc BienTinh Tri Ton Chau Phu ThanhChau XuyenLong Thoai Son Cho Moi riverHau
Sampling sites
Dry season Rainy season
QCVN 08:2015 (A1) min QCVN 08:2015 (A1) max
5 6 7 8 9
Chau Doc
Tinh Bien
Tri Ton Chau Phu
Chau Thanh
Long Xuyen
Thoai Son
Cho Moi
Hau river
Sampling sites
QCVN 08:2015 (A1) max QCVN 08:2015 (A1) min
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Year
Chau Doc Tinh Bien Tri Ton Chau Phu Chau Thanh Long Xuyen Thoai Son Cho Moi Hau river
a
b
a
Trang 4receive wastewater from agricultural production, surplus
feeding from aquaculture and domestic wastewater
Figure 7 Seasonal and spatial fluctuation of TSS from 2009
to 2016 (mean values)
Total suspended solids have shown a significant difference
between dry season and rainy season (Figure 7) in most
surveyed sites In rainy season, TSS increased dramatically
which could be due to high rainfall leading to run-off
carry-ing eroded matters into the river In addition, materials
washed away from the river banks also contributed to the
increase of suspended solids The highest TSS
concentra-tion was found in Chau Phu (107.8 mg/L) in rainy season
and the lowest one was recorded in Hau river (28.4 mg/L)
in dry season The averaged values of TSS over eight years
indicated that TSS was found highest in Tri Ton (68.3 ± 21.2
mg/L), and lowest in Chau Doc (39.8 ± 10.1 mg/L), and they
were distinctively differed with the other sites (p < 0.05)
(Figure 8)
Figure 8 The mean TSS at different sampling sites over the
period of 2009-2016 The different letters indicate
statisti-cally significantly different at α = 5%
3.4 Dissolved oxygen
As depicted in Figure 9, the dissolved oxygen (DO)
concen-tration varied unevenly and tended to increase in the
pe-riod of 2011-2012 and gradually decreased in the pepe-riod
of 2014-2016 DO varied from 3.2-6.3 mg/L over the eight
years period at all sampling sites The highest value of DO
was measured in Chau Phu (6.3 ± 1.1 mg/L) in 2012 and
the lowest was found in Thoai Son (3.2 ± 1.3 mg/L) in 2010
DO values at all sites were lower than the permitted level
of QCVN 08-MT: 2015/BTNMT except in Chau Phu area
(2012) and Hau river (2014)
Figure 9 The trend DO from 2009 to 2016 The yearly aver-age of DO was calculated from the data of three months in-cluding March, June and September
Mean DO in the rainy season and dry season in Hau river and in the field canals were 5.5 mg/L and 4.9 mg/L; 5.3 mg/L and 4.1 mg/L, respectively The values of DO in the rainy season were higher than those in the dry season in all study sites (Figure 10) The finding in this study was in consistence with the prior study which found that the DO concentration in the rainy season was usually higher than
in the dry season due to the lower organic content of the rainy season and slower oxidation rates in the dry season (Sansanayuth et al., 1996) The former study also found that DO concentrations in rainy season were higher than those in dry season in most surveyed areas in Hau river (Lien et al., 2016)
Figure 10 Seasonal and spatial fluctuation of DO from 2009
to 2016 (mean values)
Average DO over the period of 2009-2016 (Figure 11) showed that the DO at the survey sites ranged from 4.0 to 5.2 mg/L and this range was below the allowable threshold
of the standard According to QCVN 08-MT: 2015/BTNMT
on surface water quality and Ongley (2009), the limit of DO concentration for aquatic life in the Lower Mekong Basin must be 5 mg/L or higher The DO range in this study sug-gested that DO concentrations were relatively lower than the one needed for aquatic life reflecting organically pol-luted water environment In general, the DO concentration
in Hau river tended to be higher than those in the field con-nected canals and this could be because the in-field rivers
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Chau
Doc Tinh Bien TonTri Chau Phu ThanhChau XuyenLong Thoai Son Cho Moi Hau river
Sampling sites
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Chau
Doc Tinh Bien Tri Ton Chau Phu ThanhChau XuyenLong Thoai Son Cho Moi riverHau
Sampling sites
QCVN 08:2015 (A1)
c
abc
a
ab abc
3 4 5 6 7
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Year
Chau Doc Tinh Bien Tri Ton Chau Phu Chau Thanh Long Xuyen Thoai Son Cho Moi Hau river
3 4 5 6 7
Chau Doc Tinh Bien Tri Ton Chau Phu ThanhChau XuyenLong Thoai Son Cho Moi riverHau
Sampling sites
Trang 5directly received wastewater containing rich organic
mat-ters from agricultural production and daily activities The
decomposition of organic matters consumes dissolved
ox-ygen, thereby reducing DO in water
Figure 11 The mean DO at different sampling sites over the
period of 2009-2016 The different letters indicate
statisti-cally significantly different at α = 5%
3.5 Biological oxygen demand
The analysis of the monitoring results indicated that
bio-logical oxygen demand (BOD) values in the field-connected
canals were relatively low in fluctuation at the surveyed
sites (Figure 12) The highest BOD concentration in Chau
Phu area was 12.3 ± 9.2 mg/L (in 2012), the lowest ones in
the areas of Long Xuyen (4.7 ± 1.2 mg/L in 2009), and Chau
Thanh (4.7 ± 2.3 mg/L in 2010) It was clearly indicated that
BOD at all monitoring points exceeded the limit allowed by
QCVN 08-MT: 2015/BTNMT BOD in Hau River has not
been changed significantly over the years except for 2011,
which has suddenly surpassed the standard of QCVN
08-MT: 2015/BTNMT BOD values in the Hau river and field
ca-nals were not much difference and they tended to increase
over the years indicating increasing discharge of organic
wastes into the receiving rivers
Figure 12 The trend BOD from 2009 to 2016 The yearly
av-erage of BOD was calculated from the data of three months
including March, June and September
Figure 13 Seasonal and spatial fluctuation of BOD from 2009
to 2016 (mean values)
Figure 13 shows that the average BOD concentrations in rainy season and dry season in Hau River were 5.5 mg/L and 4.9 mg/L, respectively, and field canals were 5.3 mg/L and 4.1 mg/L respectively As can be seen that BOD in rainy season was generally higher than that in dry season at all sites From Figure 14, the average BOD values over the pe-riod of eight years in the study sites varied between 6.6 ± 1.2 and 8.2 ± 2.5 mg/L, reaching the mean value of 7.4 ± 2.2 mg/L BOD values were relatively stable but they ex-ceeded the permitted level of QCVN 08-MT: 2015/BTNMT from 1.2 to 1.6 times This indicated that the water quality
in the study areas is permanently organically contami-nated
Figure 14 The mean BOD at different sampling sites over the period of 2009-2016 The different letters indicate statis-tically significantly different at α = 5%
3.6 Nitrate Nitrate (N-NO3-) concentrations in the field canals were highly fluctuated in the range of 0.03-1.76 mg/L The high-est value was found in Thoai Son (1.79 ± 1,06 mg/L) while the lowest value was found in Chau Phu (0.03 ± 0.04 mg/L) Nitrate in Hau River ranged from 0.05 ± 0.03 to 1.45 ± 1.02 mg/L Monitoring results indicated that nitrate concentra-tion did not exceed the permissible limit of QCVN 08-MT: 2015/BTNMT The nitrate concentration at the survey sites was seasonally fluctuated (Figure 15) Generally, the nitrate
3
4
5
6
7
Chau
Doc Tinh Bien Tri Ton Chau Phu ThanhChau XuyenLong Thoai Son Cho Moi riverHau
Sampling site
QCVN 08:2015.(A1)
a
ab bc ab c ab a
0
5
10
15
20
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Year
Chau Doc Tinh Bien Tri Ton
Chau Phu Chau Thanh Long Xuyen
Thoai Son Cho Moi Hau river
2 4 6 8 10 12
Chau Doc Tinh Bien Tri Ton Chau Phu ThanhChau XuyenLong Thoai Son Cho Moi riverHau
Sampling sites
2 4 6 8 10 12
Chau Doc Tinh Bien Tri Ton Chau Phu ThanhChau XuyenLong Thoai Son Cho Moi riverHau
Sampling site
QCVN 08:2015 (A1)
a a a a
Trang 6values in the dry season were higher than those in the
rainy season at all sites
Figure 15 Seasonal and spatial fluctuation of N-NO 3 - from
2009 to 2016 (mean values)
Figure 16 indicated that the averaged nitrate of eight years
at the sampling sites varied from 0.31 ± 0.3 to 0.58 ± 0.64
mg/L The nitrate concentrations were low and they were
not significantly different (p > 0.05) among the sites The
nitrate concentrations were in line with the permitted
value of the National Technical Regulation on Surface
Wa-ter Quality (QCVN 08-MT: 2015/BTNMT) According to
Ongley (2009) the concentration of N-NO3-> 0.7 mg/L
would be highly potential for algae bloom According to
Boyd (1998), recommended suitable levels of N-NO3-
con-centration for aquaculture range from 0.2 to10 mg/L it
could be concluded that there was no risk of human health
and ecosystems associated with nitrate
Figure 16 The mean nitrate at different sampling sites over
the period of 2009-2016 The different letters indicate
statis-tically significantly different at α = 5%
3.7 Orthophosphate
The results showed that orthophosphate concentration
(P-PO43-) at the sites in the field canal varied from 0.02 to 0.47
mg/L, averaged at 0.16 ± 0.12 mg/L The phosphorus
con-centrations between the dry and the wet seasons (Figure
17) at the monitoring points were slightly differed in which
orthophosphate in rainy season was higher than that in dry
season except for Cho Moi area The orthophosphate
con-centration in Hau river was lower than those in the in-field
canals This could be because of volume of water and fer-tilizers used in agricultural practices and other activities
Figure 17 Seasonal and spatial fluctuation of orthophos-phate from 2009 to 2016 (mean values)
The average concentrations of orthophosphate in the study sites for the period 2009-2016 (Figure 18) showed that there was not significantly different among the study sites (p > 0.05) However, phosphorus at the monitoring points exceeded the permitted level of QCVN 08-MT: 2015/BTNMT The present study indicated that orthophos-phate could be the problem for water quality in the river system in An Giang province
Figure 18 The mean orthophosphate concentration at ferent sampling sites over the period of 2009-2016 The dif-ferent letters indicate statistically significantly difdif-ferent at α
= 5%
3.8 Coliforms The mean densities of coliforms in the field canals ranged from 2.26E+03 to 1.55E+05 MPN/100 mL Coliforms den-sity in Hau River ranged from 5.36E+03 to 1.76E+04, ex-ceeding 2.14-7.04 times compared to permitted threshold regulated in QCVN 08-MT: 2015/BTNMT Coliforms are the water quality indicator that is used to evaluate the quality
of natural water The presence of coliforms indicated that the water has been contaminated by organic matters orig-inating from human and animal wastes
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Chau
Doc Tinh Bien Tri Ton Chau Phu ThanhChau XuyenLong Thoai Son Cho Moi riverHau
Sampling sites
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Chau
Doc Tinh Bien Tri Ton Chau Phu ThanhChau XuyenLong Thoai Son Cho Moi riverHau
Sampling sites
QCVN 08:2015 (A1)
a
a a
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
Chau Doc BienTinh TonTri Chau Phu ThanhChau XuyenLong Thoai Son Cho Moi riverHau
Sampling sites
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50
Chau Doc BienTinh TonTri Chau Phu ThanhChau XuyenLong Thoai Son Cho Moi riverHau
Sampling sites
QCVN 08:2015.(A1)
a
a
a a
a a a
Trang 7Figure 19 The mean coliforms density at different sampling
sites over the period of 2009-2016 The different letters
indi-cate statistically significantly different at α = 5%
4 Conclusion
This study indicated that surface water quality of the
in-field canals and Hau river in An Giang province for the
pe-riod 2009-2016 showed signs of organic and microbial
contamination, not meeting the permitted surface water
quality for the purpose of domestic water supply, and
aquatic life as stated in the national technical standard of
QCVN 08-MT:2015/BTNMT The pollution of the field canals
was more serious than that in Hau river which could be
at-tributed to the size of the rivers The surface water quality
parameters such as DO, BOD, TSS, orthophosphate and
coliforms tended to be higher during the rainy season
in-dicating their seasonal variations The practice of
environ-mentally friendly agriculture should be implemented as
soon as possible to limit the pollution of surface water
re-sources of the Mekong Delta
Acknowledgement The author would like to thank for the
data provision from Department of Natural Resources and
Environment of An Giang province Any opinions, findings,
and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this
material are those of the author and does not necessarily
reflect the views of any agencies
5 References
[1] Ahrari, F., Eslami, N., Rajabi, O., Ghazvini, K., Barati, S
2015 The antimicrobial sensitivity of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sangius to colloidal
solu-tions of different nanoparticles applied as mouth-washes Dental Research Journal 12: 44-49
[2] Boyd, C.E 1998 Water quality for pond aquaculture Research and Development Series International Cen-ter for Aquaculture and Aquatic Environments, Au-burn University, 37 pp
[3] Duyen, P.L.M., Toan, M.V., Tri, V.P.D., Chiem, N.H.,
2015 Surface water quality and self-cleaning ability of the canal system in the closed dike area in My Luong town, Cho Moi district, An Giang province Can Tho University Journal of Science, 39: 97-104 (in Vietnam-ese)
[4] IBM Corp 2011 IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Ver-sion 20.0 Armonk, NY: IBM Corp
[5] Lien, N.T.K, Huy, L.Q, Oanh, D.T.H, Phu, T.Q., Ut, V.N
2016 Water quality in main rivers and tributaries of the Hau River Can Tho University Journal of Science, 43: 68-79 (in Vietnamese)
[6] Ongley E.D 2009 Chapter 12: Water Quality of the Lower Mekong River In: Campbell, I.C (ed.): The Me-kong: Biophysical Environment of an International River Basin Academic Press, 4951 Connaught Ave., Montreal, QC, Canada H4V 1X4, 297-320 ISBN 978-0-12-374026-7
[7] People's Committee of An Giang province, 2015 Re-port on the state of environment in five years (2011 - 2015) of An Giang province, 181 pp (in Vietnamese) [8] Phu, T.Q, Ut, V.N 2006 Water quality for pond aqua-culture Can Tho University College of Aquaculture and Fisheries 199 pp (in Vietnamese)
[9] QCVN 08-MT:2015/BTNMT (2015) National technical regulation on surface water quality
[10] Sansanayuth, P., Phadungchep, A., Ngammontha, S., Ngdngam, S., Sukasem, P., Hoshino, H., Ttabucanon, M.S 1996 Shrimp pond effluent: pollution problems and treatment by constructed wetlands Water Sci-ence and Technology, 34 (11): 93-98
1.00E+00
1.00E+01
1.00E+02
1.00E+03
1.00E+04
1.00E+05
Chau
Doc
Tinh Bien
Tri Ton
Chau Phu
Chau Thanh
Long Xuyen
Thoai Son
Cho Moi
Hau river
Sampling sites
QCVN 08:2015.(A1)
a a