Treatment of enterococcus faecalis bacteria by a helium atmospheric cold plasma brush with oxygen addition Wei Chen, Jun Huang, Ning Du, Xiao-Di Liu, Xing-Quan Wang et al.. Treatment of
Trang 1Treatment of enterococcus faecalis bacteria by a helium atmospheric cold plasma brush with oxygen addition
Wei Chen, Jun Huang, Ning Du, Xiao-Di Liu, Xing-Quan Wang et al
Related Articles
Microfluidic impedance spectroscopy as a tool for quantitative biology and biotechnology
Biomicrofluidics 6, 034103 (2012)
Biosensors for immune cell analysis—A perspective
Biomicrofluidics 6, 021301 (2012)
The theory of modulated hormone therapy for the treatment of breast cancer in pre- and post-menopausal women
AIP Advances 2, 011206 (2012)
Selective killing of ovarian cancer cells through induction of apoptosis by nonequilibrium atmospheric pressure plasma
Appl Phys Lett 100, 113702 (2012)
Rotating turkeys and self-commutating artificial muscle motors
Appl Phys Lett 100, 074108 (2012)
Additional information on J Appl Phys.
Information for Authors: http://jap.aip.org/authors
Trang 2Treatment of enterococcus faecalis bacteria by a helium atmospheric
cold plasma brush with oxygen addition
Wei Chen,1,a),b)Jun Huang,1,a)Ning Du,2Xiao-Di Liu,2Xing-Quan Wang,1Guo-Hua Lv,1
Guo-Ping Zhang,1Li-Hong Guo,2and Si-Ze Yang1,3
1
Key Laboratory of Soft Matter Physics, Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics,
Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, 100190 Beijing, China
2
Department of Oral Biology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, 100080 Beijing, China
3
Fujian Key Laboratory for Plasma and Magnetic Resonance, Department of Aeronautics, School of Physics
and Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
(Received 3 April 2012; accepted 30 May 2012; published online 6 July 2012)
An atmospheric cold plasma brush suitable for large area and low-temperature plasma-based
sterilization is designed Results demonstrate that the He/O2 plasma more effectively kills
Enterococcus faecalis than the pure He plasma In addition, the sterilization efficiency values of
the He/O2plasma depend on the oxygen fraction in Helium gas The atmospheric cold plasma
brush using a proper ratio of He/O2 (2.5%) reaches the optimum sterilization efficiency After
plasma treatment, the cell structure and morphology changes can be observed by the scanning
electron microscopy Optical emission measurements indicate that reactive species such as O
and OH play a significant role in the sterilization process.V C 2012 American Institute of Physics
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4732135]
I INTRODUCTION
In recent years, nonthermal atmospheric pressure
plas-mas have been widely studied for several novel applications
in biomedicine116 and nanotechnology.17,18 Among the
novel applications, sterilization by low temperature
atmos-pheric pressure plasmas, which are partially ionized gases, is
attracting significant attention.19–22 Very recently, a
room-temperature, battery-operated, handheld air plasma jet was
designed and applied to effectively inactivate multilayered
Enterococcus faecalis biofilms by Lu and co-workers.23
Enterococcus faecalis is a Gram-positive facultative
anaero-bic bacterium, which has a strong adaptability to temperature
and resistance to multiple antibiotics The conventional
steri-lization methods such as heat and chemical agents are not
suitable to treat these notorious heat- and drug-resistant
pathogens By contrast, low temperature atmospheric
pres-sure plasma is a more effective technology, which can
pro-vide many chemically and biologically active species,
including various atoms, ions, energetic electrons,
metasta-ble particles, and UV irradiation It has been shown that
when these plasmas generated at atmospheric pressure are
used for sterilization, they do not cause bulk destruction of
living tissue, do not damage heat-sensitive materials, and
may be touched by humans without any harm.1However, the
available atmospheric plasma sterilization processes in
cur-rent medical uses have some drawbacks that the treatment
sizes from plasma jets,24plumes,25or plasma needles26with
a diameter of a few millimeters or less are rather small
In this paper, we report an experimental study on
inacti-vation of Enterococcus faecalis bacteria by means of an
atmospheric cold plasma brush driven by an ac power
supplier The influences of oxygen addition into the helium atmospheric plasma brush on its sterilization capability are studied After the plasma treatment, scanning electron mi-croscopy (SEM) is used to inspect the bacterial cell structure changes According to the optical emission spectra of the he-lium atmospheric plasma brush with and without oxygen addition, the roles of the various plasma agents in the inacti-vation of bacteria are investigated in detail
II EXPERIMENT
A Atmospheric cold plasma brush
Figure1(a) is a schematic diagram of the experimental setup Our atmospheric cold plasma brush comprises of two parts: a discharge chamber and two electrodes placed outside the discharge chamber The discharge chamber with a vol-ume of 80 35 1 mm3is made of quartz Both electrodes are made of copper foil of 10 mm wide wrapping the dis-charge chamber The gap between the inner edges of the cop-per foil is 15 mm The ground electrode is on the upstream side; the active electrode is on the downstream side and
10 mm apart from the chamber nozzle A sinusoidal ac high-voltage (11 kHz, 22 kV peak to peak) is applied between two electrodes for the excitation and sustaining of the discharges High-purity helium and oxygen are used as the working gas, and the flow rate is controlled by the flow meter Throughout the experimental procedure, the applied power (P) is fixed at
24 W, and the He flow rate always maintains 4500 SCCM (SCCM denotes standard cubic centimeter per minute) The separation between the nozzle and the sample is 5 mm Fig-ure1(b)shows the discharge photograph of the atmospheric cold plasma brush with 4500 SCCM helium (P¼ 24 W) The visually uniform brush-shaped plasma is formed and extended out of the discharge chamber through the narrow slit at outlet
a)
Wei Chen and Jun Huang contributed equally to this work.
b) Author to whom correspondence should be addressed Electronic mail:
chwbetter@163.com.
Trang 3B Sample preparation
An overnight culture containing approximately 107
CFUs/ml is prepared (CFUs denotes colony-forming units)
Then, with filter papers as the supporting media, 5 lL of
sus-pension containing Enterococcus faecalis bacteria are
dropped onto sterilized filter papers (5 mm diameter), and
the papers are allowed to dry in a moderate vacuum
incuba-tor at 37C for 1 h Afterward, the filter papers containing
Enterococcus faecalis bacteria are exposed to the
atmos-pheric cold plasma brush sustained with He/O2 gas After
plasma treatment, the plasma treated filter papers are
trans-ferred into a 1.5 ml centrifuge tube containing 1 ml
physio-logical saline and mixed using a vortex mixer for 1 min The
bacterial strains are grown into the sterile Brian Heart
Infu-sion agar, and the number of the living bacteria cells is
counted after incubation at 37C for 48 h
III RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A I–V curve
Voltage is measured using a 1000:1 high voltage probe
(Tektronix P6015A, maximum input voltage: DC 20 kV,
bandwidth: 75 MHz) For current measurements, a magnetic
core current probe (Tektronix P6021, maximum discharge
current: 15 A, bandwidth: 60 MHz) is utilized Signals from
the current and voltage probes are acquired and recorded by
a digital Tektronix TDS 210 oscilloscope It can be seen
from Fig 2 that the breakdown of working gas in
atmos-pheric cold plasma brush, resulting in a large number of
cur-rent filaments, the so-called micro-discharges, which are
randomly distributed both in time and space In this
filamen-tary mode,27–29the discharge starts with local gas breakdown
at many points in the discharge volume This mode is
charac-terized by a periodic current constituted by many discharge
pulses in each half cycle An inverse current peak is also
observed when the polarity of the applied voltage changes
B Sterilization effect of atmospheric cold plasma brush
Figure 3 shows the change of the survival curves of Enterococcus faecalis bacteria in the He with addition of dif-ferent amounts of O2(1%, 2.5%, 5%, 10%) into atmospheric cold plasma brush (P¼ 24 W) As can be seen in Fig.3, a 5 log reduction of the cells required only 30 s exposure time with about 2.5% oxygen addition into the helium plasma, while 90 s were required in the pure helium plasma It was also noted that 2.5% O2addition provided the faster killing speed for a complete kill of the bacteria within 60 s exposure time, while it needed 120 s to completely kill the bacteria using pure helium plasma, as shown in Fig 3 The experi-mental data shows that sterilization efficacy of He/O2plasma
is better than that of pure He plasma
C Scanning electron microscopy
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Model S-5200, Hitachi, Japan) was used to examine the morphology and structural changes ofEnterococcus faecalis after plasma ex-posure The controlled and the plasma treated samples were placed in the fixation and then coated with a thin layer of plasma sputtered platinum Figure 4 shows the SEM
FIG 2 Typical oscillograms of applied voltage and discharge current of a filamentary discharge in He/O 2
FIG 3 Survival curves of Enterococcus faecalis bacteria in the He with dif-ferent O 2 additions into atmospheric cold plasma brush (P ¼ 24 W).
FIG 1 (a) Schematic diagram of the experimental setup (b) Photograph of
the atmospheric cold plasma brush with 4500 SCCM He (P¼ 24 W).
Trang 4photographs of untreated control and plasma treated
Entero-coccus faecalis with pure helium plasma brush and with
oxy-gen addition at an amount of 1% and 2.5%, respectively It
can be seen from Fig.4that the plasma treatment of
Entero-coccus faecalis resulted in a significant alteration in cell
structure and morphologies when compared with the
untreated controls As seen from images in Figs.4(b)–4(d),
more structure damages were observed onEnterococcus
fae-calis with increasing the oxygen addition amount with
vol-ume percent of 0, 1%, and 2.5% Consistent with the cell
surviving curve shown in Fig.3, He plasma with 2.5% O2
addition provided a much faster killing of the bacteria From
Fig.4, it was also noted that the oxygen-based plasma
spe-cies were mainly responsible in improving the plasma
inacti-vation efficiency and oxidation capacity of Enterococcus
faecalis
D Optical emission spectra
To identify the various reactive species generated by the
atmospheric cold plasma brush, the optical emission
spec-trum (Stellarnet, EPP-2000 C) of He/O2plasma is measured
in the 200–850 nm wavelength range at atmospheric pres-sure Figure 5 shows the optical emission spectra of the plasma with 4500 SCCM He/O2(2.5%) taken at 5 mm bot-tom the nozzle along axis It is well known that UV radiation
in the 200–300 nm region with doses of several milliwatt per square centimeter may cause lethal damage to cells How-ever, the UV radiation intensity in 200–300 nm wavelength range is below 50 lW/cm2 In addition, the inactivation effect on bacteria by ultraviolet radiation is mostly related to the DNA/RNA damage in UV-C (200–280 nm).30Therefore, the UV emission plays a minor role in the inactivation of the bacteria It clearly shows that excited O lines (285 and
777 nm), OH line (309 nm), molecular nitrogen lines (C3Gu— B3Gg) (316, 337, 357, 380, and 391 nm), Oþline (427 nm), Haline (656 nm) and excited He atom lines (501,
587, 640, 669, 707, and 729 nm) are presented in the plasma brush Atomic oxygen is probably due to the direct electron impact dissociations of oxygen molecule (eþ O2
! O þ O þ e).31 O may also be formed through Penning ionization (N2þ O2! N2þ O þ O).32 , 33We assign the fea-ture at 309 nm to the OH (A2Rþ— X2G) transition;34,35the formation of which is attributed to the reaction of excited O with water vapor (H2O þ O* ! 2OH) and the electron impact dissociation (H2Oþ e! H þ OH þ e) The pres-ence of N2(C!B) lines clearly reveals the air entrainment
in the plasma brush The Ha emission line at 656 nm is formed by the collision between water vapor molecules and electrons (H2Oþ e! H þ OH þ e) The formation of
O2þ is probably due to Penning ionization (He*þ O2
! He þ O2 þþ e).36Furthermore, the addition of oxygen to the He plasma decreases He molecules’ emission,37 but enhances intensity level of reactive oxygen radicals This can be accounted for from that some electrons are probably consumed to produce O radicals Others then collided with air, water vapor, and He to produce N, OH and He radicals
In fact, reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a major role in
FIG 4 Scanning electron micrographs of Enterococ-cus faecalis bacteria of (a) untreated control, (b) helium plasma treatment, (c) He þ 1% O 2 plasma treatment, (d) He þ 2.5% O 2 plasma treatment Plasma conditions were 4500 SCCM helium flow rate and 60 s exposure time (P ¼ 24 W).
FIG 5 Emission spectra of the plasma with 4500 SCCM He/O 2 (2.5%)
taken at 5 mm bottom the nozzle (P ¼ 24 W).
Trang 5bacterial inactivation38,39 and lead to various biological
effects in the intracellular space.40 These reactive species
could directly act on microorganisms, especially their outer
membranes, and damage them because of a strong oxidation
mechanism To increase the content of OH and O radicals,
increasing O2concentration is a useful method
IV CONCLUSION
In this study, an atmospheric cold plasma brush is
designed and fabricated The effect of oxygen on the
deacti-vation of Enterococcus faecalis by an atmospheric cold
plasma brush is presented Experimental results show that
oxygen addition into the plasma brush can improve the
deac-tivation efficiency of Enterococcus Faecalis The
atmos-pheric cold plasma brush using a proper ratio of He/O2
(2.5%) reaches the maximum sterilization efficiency After
plasma treatment, SEM images show obvious cell structure
damages in morphology of the organisms In addition,
opti-cal emission spectroscopy clearly indicates that there are
excited OH, O, N2, and He in the atmospheric cold plasma
brush, and OH and O radicals are mainly responsible for the
bacteria death
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Young Scientists Fund
of the National Natural Science Foundation of China under
Grant No 11005151
1
X H Zhang, J Huang, X D Liu, L Peng, Y Sun, W Chen, K C Feng,
and S Z Yang, Acta Phys Sin 58, 1595 (2009).
2 D C Wang, D Zhao, K C Feng, X H Zhang, D P Liu, and S Z Yang,
Appl Phys Lett 98, 161501 (2011).
3
J Huang, H Li, W Chen, G Lv, X Wang, G Zhang, K Ostrikov, P.
Wang, and S Yang, Appl Phys Lett 99, 253701 (2011).
4 M Kong, M Keidar, and K Ostrikov, J Phys D: Appl Phys 44, 174018
(2011).
5
D Dobrynin, G Fridman, and A Fridman, New J Phys 11, 115020
(2009).
6 S X Deng, C Cheng, G H Ni, Y D Meng, and H Chen, Chin Phys B
19, 105203 (2010).
7
M Laroussi and X Lu, Appl Phys Lett 87, 113902 (2005).
8
G Fridman, G Friedman, A Gutsol, A B Shekhter, V N Vasilets, and
A Fridman, Plasma Process Polym 5, 503 (2008).
9 M Laroussi, W Hynes, T Akan, X Lu, and C Tendero, IEEE Trans.
Plasma Sci 36, 1298 (2008).
10 G Fridman, A Shereshevsky, M M Jost, A D Brooks, A Fridman, A Gutsol, V Vasilets, and G Friedman, Plasma Chem Plasma Process 27,
163 (2007).
11
G E Morfill, M G Kong, and J L Zimmermann, New J Phys 11,
115011 (2009).
12 X Lu, T Ye, Y Cao, Z Sun, Q Xiong, Z Tang, Z Xiong, J Hu, Z Jiang, and Y Pan, J Appl Phys 104, 053309 (2008).
13
J Goree, B Liu, D Drake, and E Stoffels, IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 34,
1317 (2006).
14 A Shashurin, M Keidar, S Bronnikov, R A Jurjus, and M A Stepp,
Appl Phys Lett 93, 181501 (2008)
15
Z Xiong, X Lu, Y Cao, Q Ning, K Ostrikov, Y Lu, X Zhou, and J Liu, Appl Phys Lett 99, 253703 (2011).
16 H J Lee, C H Shon, Y S Kim, S Kim, G C Kimand, and M G Kong,
New J Phys 11 115026 (2009).
17
P A Lin and R M Sankaran, Angew Chem., Int Ed 50, 10953 (2011).
18 J Zheng, R Yang, L Xie, J Qu, Y Liu, and X Li, Adv Mater 22, 1451 (2010).
19
Z Xiong, T Du, X Lu, Y Cao, and Y Pan, Appl Phys Lett 98, 221503 (2011).
20 T Shimizu, J Zimmermann, and G Morfill, New J Phys 13, 023026 (2011).
21
M J Traylor, M J Pavlovich, S Karim, P Hait, Y Sakiyama, D S Clark, and D B Graves, J Phys D: Appl Phys 44, 472001 (2011).
22 G Kim, W Kim, K Kim, and J Lee, Appl Phys Lett 96, 021502 (2010).
23 X Pei, X Lu, J Liu, D Liu, Y Yang, K Ostrikov, P K Chu, and Y Pan,
J Phys D: Appl Phys 45, 165205 (2012).
24
J Lim, H Uhm, and S Li, Phys Plasmas 14, 093504 (2007).
25 X Deng, J Shi, G Shama, and M Kong, Appl Phys Lett 87, 153901 (2005).
26
J Huang, W Chen, H Li, X Wang, G Lv, M Khosa, M Guo, K Feng,
P Wang, and S Yang, J Appl Phys 109, 053305 (2011).
27 A Fridman, A Chirokov, and A Gutsol, J Phys D: Appl Phys 38, R1 (2005).
28
R Brandenburg, Z Navratil, J Jansky, P Stahel, D Trunec, and H Wag-ner, J Phys D: Appl Phys 42, 085208 (2009).
29 C Q Wang, G X Zhang, and X X Wang, Vacuum 86, 960 (2012).
30 J P Chen, L Yang, L K Wang, and B Zhang, in Advanced Physico-chemical Treatment Processes, edited by L K Wang, Y.-T Huang, and
N K Shammas (Humana, New Jersey, 2006), pp 318–328.
31 B Eliasson, M Hirth, and U Kogelschatz, J Phys D 20, 1421 (1987).
32 R Alvarez, M C Quintero, and A Rodero, J Phys D 38, 3768 (2005).
33
G V Naidis, J Phys D 30, 1214 (1997).
34
C Hibert, I Gaurand, O Motret, and J M Pouvesle, J Appl Phys 85,
7070 (1999).
35
J C Hilary, L C Matthew, and G M Kenneth, J Chem Phys 119, 9461 (2003).
36
D C Seo and T H Chung, J Phys D 34, 2854 (2001).
37 J Goree, B Liu, and D Drake, J Phys D: Appl Phys 39, 3479 (2006).
38 D X Liu, M Z Rong, X H Wang, F Iza, M G Kong, and P Brugge-man, Plasma Process Polym 7, 846 (2010).
39
D X Liu, F Iza, X H Wang, M G Kong, and M Z Rong, Appl Phys Lett 98, 221501 (2011).
40 X Yan, Z L Xiong, F Zou, S S Zhao, X P Lu, G X Yang, G Y He, and K Ostrikov, Plasma Process Polym 9, 59 (2012).