CARLYLE 153 Specimen Design and Fabrication 155 Experimental Facilities and Procedures 156 Mechanical Property Results 157 Composite Resuhs 159 Acoustic Emission Response 160 Analysis a
Trang 2TESTING AND DESIGN
(FOURTH CONFERENCE)
A conference sponsored by the AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS Valley Forge, Pa, 3-4 May 1976
ASTM SPECIAL TECHNICAL PUBLICATION 617
J G Davis, Jr., conference chairman
List price$51.75 04-617000-33
#
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS
1916 Race Street, Philadelphia, Pa 19103
Trang 3© by AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS 1977
Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 76-40796
NOTE The Society is not responsible, as a body, for the statements and opinions advanced in this publication
Trang 4The Fourth Conference on Composite Materials: Testing and Design was held 3-4 May 1976 at Valley Forge, Pa The American Society for Testing and Materials' Committee D-30 on High Modulus Fibers and Their Composites sponsored the conference J G Davis, Jr., National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Langley Research Center, served
as conference chairman Most of the papers presented at the eight sessions are included in this volume which complements the first, second, and
third conference publications—>lSrM STP 460, ASTM STP 497, and ASTM STP 546, Composite Materials: Testing and Design
Trang 5Related ASTM Publications
Composite Reliability, STP 580 (1975), $49.75 (04-580000-33)
Fracture Mechanics of Composites, STP 593 (1976), $23.50 (04-593000-33)
Environmental Effects on Advanced Composite Materials, STP 602
Trang 6to Reviewers
This publication is made possible by the authors and, also, the
un-heralded efforts of the reviewers This body of technical experts whose
dedication, sacrifice of time and effort, and collective wisdom in
review-ing the papers must be acknowledged The quality level of ASTM
publica-tions in a direct function of their respected opinions On behalf of ASTM
we acknowledge their contribution with appreciation
ASTM Committee on Publications
Trang 7Editorial Staff
Jane B Wheeler, Managing Editor Helen M Hoersch, Associate Editor Ellen J McGlinchey, Assistant Editor Kathleen P Turner, Assistant Editor Sheila G Pulver, Assistant Editor
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Sun Jan 3 20:09:22 EST 2016
Downloaded/printed by
University of Washington (University of Washington) pursuant to License Agreement No further reproductions authorized.
Trang 8Introduction
FRACTURE AND FATIGUE
Fracture Resistance Characterization of Graphite/Epoxy Composites—
D H MORRIS AND H T HAHN 5
Experimental Program 6
Results 7
Conclusions 15
An Experimental Study of tlie Fracture Behavior of Laminated
Graphite/Epoxy Composites—H F. BRINSON AND Y T YEOW 18
Materials and Test Procedures 22
Experimental Results 22
Discussion 34
Effect of Time at Load on Fatigue Response of [(0/±45/90) J ^
T300/5208 Graphite-Epoxy Laminate—G P. SENDECKYJ AND
H D STALNAKER 39
Experimental Results 40
Analysis of Test Results 46
Conclusions 51
Preliminary Development of a Fundamental Analysis Model for
Crack Growth in a Fiber Reinforced Composite Material—
M F KANNINEN, E F RYBICKI, AND W I GRIFFITH 53
Analysis Procedure 54
Example Computational Results and Discussion 62
Fatigue of Notched Fiber Composite Laminates: Analytical and
Experimental Evaluation—S V. KULKARNI, P V. MCLAUGHLIN,
J R , R B PIPES, AND B W ROSEN 70
Static Failure Model 72
Fatigue Analysis 75
Experimental Program 78
Analysis/Experiment Correlation Study 84
Concluding Remarks 91
Trang 9Delamination in Quasi-Isotropic Graphite-Epoxy Laminates—
K L REIFSNIDER, E G HENNEKE II, AND W W STINCHCOMB 93
Experimental Program 94
Results 96 Discussion and Conclusions 103
Structural Design Significance of Tension-Tension Fatigue Data on
MATERIALS AND PROCESSING
Evaluation of Selected High-Temperature Thermoplastic Polymers
for Advanced Composite and Adhesive Applications—
Development of Multidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Plastics—
Y SUEZAWA, M TAKEMOTO, ANDS TAKAHASHI 137
Fabrication Method of Multidirectional Glass-Fiber Reinforced
Acoustic Emission Response Characteristics of Metal Matrix
Composites—R B. PIPES, N J. BALLINTYN, W R SCOTT, AND
J M CARLYLE 153
Specimen Design and Fabrication 155
Experimental Facilities and Procedures 156
Mechanical Property Results 157
Composite Resuhs 159
Acoustic Emission Response 160
Analysis and Conclusions 163
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Sun Jan 3 20:09:22 EST 2016
Downloaded/printed by
University of Washington (University of Washington) pursuant to License Agreement No further reproductions authorized.
Trang 10Compression Testing Procedure 172
Experimental Verification 177
Summary and Conclusions 188
Nondestructive Tests for Sliear Strength Degradation of a
Graphite-Epoxy Composite—D H KAEBLE AND P J DYNES 190
Experimental 191 Results 191 Summary 199
Failure Analysis of tlie Split-D Test Method—C E. KNIGHT, J R 201
Finite Element Model and Analysis 202
Results of Analysis 206
Experimental Results 212
Conclusions and Recommendations 214
Longitudinal Residual Stresses in Boron Fibers—D R. BEHRENDT 215
Experimental Test Apparatus 216
Specimen Description 218
Analysis of the Data 218
Experimental Results 219
Discussion 222
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS
Effect of Stacking Sequence on the Notched Strength of Laminated
Experimental Program 230
Data Reduction 234
Discussion and Conclusions 238
An Analysis Model for Spatially Oriented Fiber Composites—
B W ROSEN, S N CHATTERJEE, AND J J KIBLER 243
Background 244 Description of the Model 246
Method of Analysis 248
Property Predictions 251
Concluding Remarks 253
Empirical Crippling Analysis of Graphite/Epoxy Laminated
Experimental Procedure 257
Trang 11Orthotropic Theoretical Elastic Buckling Equations 259
Theoretical Elastic Buckling of A-S/3501 Graphite/Epoxy 264
Orthotropic Nondimensional Empirical Crippling Equations 264
Crippling Test Program 265
Empirical Crippling Curves 266
Conclusions and Recommendations 270
Reliability Prediction for Composites Under Periodic Proof
Tests in Service—J N YANG 272
Statistical Distribution of Residual Strength Under Service Loads
and Periodic Proof Tests 274
Service Loads and Failure Rate 277
Probability of Failure Under Periodic Proof Tests In Service 279
Numerical Examples 284
Conclusion 290
A Perturbation Solution for Interlaminar Stresses in Bidirectional
Laminates—P W Hsu AND C T HERAKOVICH 296
Formulation 297
Conclusion 315
Evaluation of Composite Curing Stresses—N J PAG AND AND H T
HAHN 317 Analytical Approach 318
Stress-Free Temperature 320
Curing Stress Experiment 321
Influence of Curing Stresses on Laminate Strength 324
Concluding Remarks 328
Lamination Residual Strains and Stresses in Hybrid Laminates—
I M DANIEL AND T LIBER 330
Experimental Procedure 331
Results and Discussion 332
Summary and Conclusions 341
Tensile and Compressive Behavior of Borsic/Aluminum—
C T HERAKOVICH, J G DAVIS, J R , AND C N VISWANATHAN 344
Trang 12Tension Tests 363
Compression Tests 363
In-Plane Shear Tests 365
Interlaminar Shear Tests 365
Bolt Bearing Tests 366
Tension Fatigue Tests 366
Composite Preparation and Tests 377
Results and Discussion 379
Summary and Conclusions 387
Impact Damage in Graphite-Fiber-Reinforced Composites—
L B GRESZCZUK AND H CHAD 389
Theoretical Considerations 390
Theory Application 395
Experimental Studies 401
Discussion and Conclusions 403
Impact Response of Polymer-Matrix Composite Materials—
An Analytical Method for Evaluation of Impact Damage Energy of
Laminated Composites—C T SUN 427
Trang 13Effects of Tliermal Cycling on tlie Properties of Grapliite-Epoxy
Thermally Induced Failure Mechanisms 467
Experimental Work 468
Conclusions 480
Moisture Effects in Epoxy Matrix Composites—C E. BROWNING,
G E HusMAN, AND J M WHITNEY 481
Experimental Procedures 482
Effect of Absorbed Moisture on Glass Transition Temperature 484
Prediction of Moisture Diffusion 486
Discussion of Mechanical Properties 488
Moisture Absorption and Desorption in Epoxy Composite Laminates—
C D SHIRRELL AND J HALPIN 514
Theory of Diffusion 515
Diffusion of Water in Composite Laminates 517
Effects of Moisture Absorption 522
Trang 14Introduction
The American Society for Testing and Materials held the Fourth
Con-ference on Composite Materials: Testing and Design on 3-4 May 1976 in
Valley Forge, Pa The objectives of this conference were the same as
those of its organizing group (ASTM Committee D-30), that is, to
stimu-late research and promote the understanding of the behavior of fibers and
their composites, including reexamination of conventional tests in the
light of structural design requirements and composite material properties
Because the field of advanced composites is rapidly growing and
chang-ing, it is possible to meet such broad objectives only to the extent the
technology has progressed to date—and this the Fourth Conference has
done successfully The previous three similar conferences were held in
New Orleans in 1969 {ASTM STP 460), Anaheim in 1971 (ASTM STP
497), and Williamsburg in 1973 {ASTM STP 546), and succeeding
confer-ences will continue to be held as long as encouragement of new
develop-ments continue to be needed This volume includes most of the papers
presented at the conference, and, since its eight sessions (two on fracture
and fatigue, two on design and analysis, and one on materials and
pro-cessing, test methods, impact, and environment, respectively) cover the
total subject adequately in depth and breadth, it will make a valuable
ad-dition to the library of the scientist, analyst, designer, or testing engineer
who is seeking a better understanding of the behavior of advanced
com-posite materials
The papers in this volume cover a wide range of topics—from
investi-gation of a single filament to the design and fabrication of flight
hard-ware for acommerical transport All papers deal with subjects which may
affect the apphcation of advanced composites to industrial, military, and
consumer products Contributions in the areas of fracture and fatigue
phenomena, evaluation of resin matrices for advanced composites and
adhesives, processing for multidirectional fiber-reinforced composites,
test methods (including nondestructive), impact phenomena,
environ-mental effects, and the design and analysis of advanced composite
mate-rial are included Both theoretical and experimental approaches are
described and useful data are presented It is hoped that dissemination
of the results of recent advancements and successes will encourage
appli-cation of composites to new industrial, military, and consumer areas
Special thanks are due to Dr S Y Elliott, symposium chairman of the
third conference, for his advice and guidance in organizing and
Trang 15schedul-2 COMPOSITE MATERIALS (FOURTH CONFERENCE)
ing this conference Recognition is also due the authors, session chairmen,
reviewers, and ASTM staff who responded in a timely and professional
manner to make this conference a success
J G Davis, Jr
National Aeronautics and Space tration-Langley Research Center, Hampton, Va 23665;
Trang 17D H Morris' and H T Hahn'
Fracture Resistance Characterization
of Graphite/Epoxy Composites
REFERENCE: Morris, D H and Hahn, H T., "Fracture Resistance
Characteriza-tion of Grapliite/Epoxy Composites," Composite Materials: Testing and Design
(Fourth Conference), ASTM STP 617 American Society for Testing and Materials,
1977, pp 5-17
ABSTRACT: The resistance method has been applied to graphite/epoxy composites
The method is based on the assumption that the damage growth at the crack tip can
be modeled as a self-similar crack extension through compUance matching
Experi-mental data for center-cracked tension specimens reveal a Unear relationship between
crack-growth resistance and initial crack length For the [0/±45], laminate, the
effective increment of crack length at fracture and the corresponding crack-growth
resistance essentially are independent of initial crack length The average amount of
this crack extension in the [0/±45]2;, and [0/±45], laminates is higher than the values
obtained from a best fit of fracture strength data reported in the literature However,
the present method results in an improved prediction of fracture strength for the
[0/90/±45], laminate
KEY WORDS: composite materials, laminates, fracture tests, resistance method
A great deal of effort has been expended on resistance curve (Ajj-curve)
determination of metals [/].' However, there have been but a few attempts
to extend this method to advanced composites Gaggar and Broutman [2]
generated crack-growth resistance curves for epoxy and polyester
com-posites randomly reinforced with discontinuous fibers Their results
in-dicate that the ^^R-curve is independent of initial crack length They
con-clude from their study that the KR-CUIVC concept can be a useful approach
to study the crack-growth phenomena in random fiber composites
Eftis et al [3] state the basic concept of the resistance curve as follows:
as the rate of energy available for crack extension, G, is increased during
specimen loading, it is opposed by an increasing resistance to crack
exten-sion, R, such that G and R remain in equilibrium up to the point of crack
instabiUty The resistance curve represents the rate of energy absorption
' Associate professor, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Miss 39762
^ Research engineer University of Dayton Research Institute, Dayton Ohio 45469
' The italic numbers in brackets refer to the list of references appended to this paper
Copyright 1977 by AS FM International www.astm.org
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Sun Jan 3 20:09:22 EST 2016
Downloaded/printed by
University of Washington (University of Washington) pursuant to License Agreement No further reproductions authorized.
Trang 18in the creation of new surfaces and plastic deformation throughout the
border region of the crack
The mechanism of energy absorption for composite materials is not
the same as that of metals In metals, slow, stable crack growth often is
observed prior to catastrophic failure In testing composites, it was found
that there is no visible self-similar crack growth The damages at crack
tips typically occur in the form of cracking along the fiber directions
within plies and delamination Frequently, these damages cannot be seen
with the naked eye; however, they are amenable to some of the
non-destructive examination techniques such as X-ray [4], The effect of these
differences in damage mode on constructing resistance curves will be
discussed later
The objective of this paper is to consider the possibility of using the
resistance method as a means of characterizing the fracture resistance of
graphite/epoxy composites The materials tested have different laminate
thicknesses and ply orientations
Experimental Program
The material used in the experimental program consisted of Thornel
300 graphite fibers in Narmco 5208 epoxy resin A total of 35
center-cracked tension specimens were tested All specimens were 2 in wide,
12 in long (9 in between end tabs), with crack lengths 0.2 to 1.0 in., in
increments of 0.2 in Cracks were produced by first drilling a small hole
in a specimen, followed by a final lengthening with a 5 mil diamond wire
No attempt was made to further sharpen the crack tips
The laminate orientations and number of specimens may be summarized
as
[0/90/±45]s: two specimens of each crack length [0/ ± 45],: two specimens of each crack length
[ 0 / ± 4 5 ] 2 J : three specimens of each crack length
The unnotched tensile strength was determined by testing six tensile
cou-pons of the [0/90/±45]s laminate and four coucou-pons of the [ 0 / ± 4 5 ] 2 J
laminate
All specimens were loaded by friction grips and tested in a closed loop
MTS machine at a constant cross-head rate of 0.04 in./min During each
test, the applied load and a pseudocrack opening displacement (COD)
were monitored and recorded continuously The COD was measured by a
double cantilever clip gage of the type used in fracture testing of metals
[5] The clip gage was attached to aluminum tabs which were bonded to
the specimen with epoxy cement 0.3 in apart
Trang 19MORRIS AND HAHN ON FRACTURE RESISTANCE 7
Results
A comparison of three test records of load versus COD where each
specimen has the same initial crack length is seen in Fig 1 The load-COD
Crack Opening Displacement
FIG 1—Comparison of toad-crack opening displacement records
records are initially linear, followed by rapid changes in COD similar to
the pop-in effect seen in metals The rapid changes in COD were
accom-panied by audible levels of acoustic emission; however, no attempt was
made to record acoustic emission or to correlate it with load-COD data
Figure 1 also indicates that the load-COD relationship remains linear
even between loads where there is a rapid increase in COD Using random
fiber composites, Gaggar and Broutman [2] found the load-COD records
to be initially Unear followed by a deviation in lineeirity that is practically
continuous
As previously mentioned, the composites tested did not exhibit any
visible self-similar crack growth such as occurs in metals Hence, in order
to construct resistance curves, an effective crack length may be defined by
matching the compliance based on the COD
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Sun Jan 3 20:09:22 EST 2016
Downloaded/printed by
University of Washington (University of Washington) pursuant to License Agreement No further reproductions authorized.
Trang 20Compliance calibration (based on COD), as a function of initial crack
length, was obtained from the initial straight portion of a load-COD
record Figure 2 shows calibration curves for the three laminates tested
These curves are used to determine the effective crack lengths
0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 OB 0.9 1.0
Initial Crack Length , 2 a ( I n )
FIG 2—Compliance curves for three laminates
Figure 3 illustrates the method of calculating the effective crack length
First, a straight line is drawn from the origin to the loading curve at
selected intervals of load or COD (shown as dashed Unes); the inverse of
the slope is the compliance This value of compUance, together with the
calibration curve shown in Fig 2, gives an effective crack length The
effective crack length is not a preexisting crack, but rather a crack-like
region developing prior to the commencement of uhimate failure [2,6\
Continuing in this manner, additional values of effective crack length are
found from Figs 2 and 3
Crack growth resistance, which is a function of crack length, is
cal-culated from
where
<T = nominal stress based on increasing load levels and unnotched area,
a = effective crack half-length at the corresponding load level, and
Y = finite width correction factor based on effective crack half-length
Trang 21MORRIS AND HAHN ON FRACTURE RESISTANCE 9
Crock Opening Displocemeni
FIG i—Schematic of compliance determination
The finite width correction factor for the [0/±45]2j and [0/±45]s
lam-inates is slightly different from the isotropic value However, the difference
is less than 4 percent in the entire range of crack sizes considered [7]
Therefore, Y is determined from the equation for isotropic materials [J]
Y = I + 0.1282 (2a/H^) - 0.2881 (2a/Wy + 1.5254 (2a/W^)' (2)
Figure 4 depicts the relationship between crack-growth resistance and
effective crack half-length for the quasi-isotropic laminate There is no
effective crack growth for a specimen with an initial crack length (2ao) of
0.2 in When 2oo = 0.4 in., three straight Unes are shown in Fig 4, the
dashed Unes are the results of two different tests, the solid line is an
"eye-ball" best fit of the two tests For the other two initial crack lengths, only
the soUd line is shown This figure illustrates that the ^g-effective
crack-length relationship is linear
The results shown in Figs 5 and 6 also indicate a linear relationship
between KR and effective crack length Superposition of the figures reveals
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Sun Jan 3 20:09:22 EST 2016
Downloaded/printed by
University of Washington (University of Washington) pursuant to License Agreement No further reproductions authorized.
Trang 22Effective Crack Half-length (in.)
FIG 4—Crack-growth resistance for [0/90/±45J s laminate
that the straight lines for the same 2ao almost are identical, indicating that
crack-growth resistance should be independent of laminate thickness
However, more data are needed to substantiate this statement
If the crack-growth resistance curve has a unique shape and is
inde-pendent of initial crack length, specimen geometry, and boundary loading
conditions, it can be considered a material property Figure 7 represents
the crack-growth resistance KR as a function of crack extension (Aa =
a - flo) for the [0/±45]2s laminate Due to data scatter, no conclusive
statement can be made as to whether KR is a material property
Once the A^R-curve is obtained, the ultimate failure stress can be
deter-mined by the point of tangency between KR, as found from Eq 1, and
^-curves defined by
Trang 23MORRIS AND HAHN ON FRACTURE RESISTANCE 11
FIG 5—Crack-growth resistance for [0/±45]2^ laminate
with (T as a parameter (Fig 8) The results indicate no point of tangency
Thus, the critical value of K is the maximum value on the KR effective
crack-length curve
Figure 5 shows that the maximum value of KR is practically constant
for the [ 0 / ± 4 5 ] 2 J laminate, where three specimens of each crack length
were tested However, such a statement cannot be made for the [0/ ± 45]^
and [0/90/±45]J laminates, where only two specimens of each crack
length were tested Another interesting feature of the results is that the
value of KR at initiation of crack growth is independent of initial crack
length except for the smallest cracks in the [0/±45]25 and [0/±45]s
lam-inates
In all the laminates tested, the amount of effective crack growth Ac at
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Sun Jan 3 20:09:22 EST 2016
Downloaded/printed by
University of Washington (University of Washington) pursuant to License Agreement No further reproductions authorized.
Trang 240 , 2 0.3 0,4 O.e
Effective Crock Half-length (in)
FIG 6—Crack-growth resistance for [0/±45Js laminate
fracture depends on initial crack length as seen in Fig 9 This dependence
is seen to be least for the [0/ ± 45] 2^ laminate and most for the [0/90/ + 45J,
laminate However, the average amount is almost the same for both
[0/±45]2s and [0/±45]j laminates, indicating negligible effect of
thick-ness Note that the straight lines represent the average values
Several models have been proposed in the literature [8.9] for the
pre-diction of fracture strength In the case of cracks, the average stress
model [9] becomes identical with the inherent flaw model [8] as discussed
in Ref 6 It should be noted that the inherent flaw model also follows
from the present resistance method if ^^ and Aa at fracture are independent
of initial crack size
According to the preceding models, the ratio of the (notched) fracture
strength (T„ to the (unnotched) ultimate strength ffui, is given by
Trang 25MORRIS AND HAHN ON FRACTURE RESISTANCE 13
Crack Extension, Aa (in.)
FIG 7—Crack-growth resistance as a function of crack extension for [0/±45]2s laminate
where Co is the dimension of the damage zone at crack tips Note that Y is
calculated for the original crack length 2ao The average strengths required
in the foregoing equation are listed in Table 1 together with the raw data
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Sun Jan 3 20:09:22 EST 2016
Downloaded/printed by
University of Washington (University of Washington) pursuant to License Agreement No further reproductions authorized.
Trang 260.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 CRACK - H A L F LENGTH (in.)
[0/±45]j
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 CRACK -HALF LENGTH (in.)
[O/90/t 45J5
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 CRACK-HALF LENGTH (in.)
FIG 9—Crack growth at fracture versus initial crack half-length
TABLE 1—Ultimate strengths
Laminate
[ 0 / ± 4 5 ] , ,
Avg
CV, % [0/90/±45],
Thickness,
in
0.065 0.065 0.065 0.065 0.065
0 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.044 0.043 0.044 0.044 0.86
Strength, 10' psi 80.06 82.40 67.50 83.78 78.44 9.50 65.66 64.54 68.25 66.26 65.02 65.59 65.89 1.97 NOTE—CV = Coefficient of variation
Trang 27MORRIS AND HAHN ON FRACTURE RESISTANCE 15
The Strengths of [0/±45]j and [0/90/±45]^ laminates are slightly lower
than those reported for a [0/±45]j laminate [7\ and for a [0/±45/90]2j
FIG 10—Prediction of fracture strength
each laminate, Co was taken to be the average amount of crack growth at
fracture The experimental data are shown in Fig 10, and specimen
dimensions are listed in Table 2 Thickness does not seem to affect the
fracture strength, as can be seen from the data for the [0/±45]2s and
[0/±45]j laminates
For the [0/±45]2i and [0/±45]j laminates, the values of Co obtained by
using the present method of compliance matching yield results higher than
the experimental data These values of Co are higher than the one (0.075
in.) for the [0/±45]j laminate reported [70], where Co was determined
from the best fit of the data This latter value was found to result in lower
than actual strengths for the [0/90±45]2^ laminate [9] However, the
present value of Co, which is higher than 0.075 in., for the [0/90/±45]^
laminate leads to a good agreement between the theory and data
Conclusions
The resistance method has been applied to graphite/epoxy composites
The method is based on the assumption that damage growth at the crack
tip can be modeled as a self-similar crack extension through compliance
matching The ^^-curve thus obtained provides full information on the
fracture resistance of the material up to final fracture In the case of
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Sun Jan 3 20:09:22 EST 2016
Downloaded/printed by
University of Washington (University of Washington) pursuant to License Agreement No further reproductions authorized.
Trang 28TABLE 2—Fracture strengths
[0/±45]j
[0/±45]2, [0/±45]j
[0/±45]2, [0/±45]j
[0/±45]
[0/±45L [0/±45]
[0/±45L [0/±45]
[0/±45]
[0/±45]
[0/±45L [0/±45], [0/±45L [0/±451, [0/±45]
[0/90/±45]
[0/90/±45]
[0/90/±45], [0/90/±45]
[0/90/±45], [0/90/±45], [0/90/±45], [0/90/±45], [0/90/±45], [0/90/±45],
W, in
2.00 2.00 1.99 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.99 2.00 2.00 1.99 2.00 1.99 2.00 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 2.00 1.99 2.01 2.00 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.99 2.00 2.00
t, in
0.0679 0.0677 0.0670 0.0683 0.0674 0.0675 0.0682 0.0676 0.0674 0.0654 0.0676 0.0666 0.0676 0.0667 0.0677 0.0345 0.0346 0.0350 0.0346 0.0345 0.0345 0.0349 0.0340 0.0329 0.0347 0.0333 0.0331 0.0462 0.0460 0.0469 0.0447 0.0466 0.0466 0.0470 0.0471 0.0466 0.0470
2ao in
0.20 0.19 0.19 0.40 0.40 0.39 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.78 0.81 0.79 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.20 0.19 0.40 0.40 0.59 0.60 0.80 0.79 1.00 0.99 1.18 1.19 0.20 0.20 0.39 0.40 0.60 0.60 0.79 0.79 0.99 0.99
0.332 0.257 0.700 0.607 0.765 0.810 1.057 1.062
0.762 0.508 0.683 0.707 1.035 1.043
NOTE—I-c02-l,2; linear to fracture
graphite/epwxy composites studied, the relationship between KR and
effec-tive crack length is linear The value of KR at initiation of crack growth
is fairly independent of initial crack length In addition, the effective
increment of crack length at fracture and the corresponding KR essentially
are independent of initial crack length, at least for one of the laminates
tested For the [0/±45]2j and [0/±45]j laminates, the effective increment
of crack length at fracture determined by the compliance matching is
higher than the values resulting from a best fit of experimental strength
data [70] However, the present method leads to an improved prediction
of fracture strength for the [0/90/±45]^ laminate
Trang 29MORRIS AND HAHN ON FRACTURE RESISTANCE 17
Acknowledgments
The first author would Uke to acknowledge the support of the Air Force
Office of Scientific Research for providing a fellowship through the
United States Air Force—American Society for Engineering Education
Summer Faculty Research Program The second author's work was
spon-sored by the Nonmetallic Materials Division of the Air Force Materials
Laboratory under Contract No F33615-75-C-5093 The authors would
also Uke to thank Dr R Kim for performing the tests
References
[/] Fracture Toughness Evaluation by R-Curve Methods, ASTM STP 527, American
Society for Testing and Materials, 1973
[2] Gaggar, S and Broutman, L J., Journal of Composite Materials, Vol 9, 1975, pp
216-227
[JJ Eftis, J., Jones, D L and Liebowitz, H., Fracture Mechanics of Aircraft Structures,
H Liebowitz, Ed., AGARD-AG-176, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 1974, pp
32-73
[4\ Chang, F H., Couchman, J C , Eisenmann, J R., and Yee, B G W., in
Com-posite Reliability, ASTM STP 580, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1975,
pp 176-190
[5] Brown, W F and Srawley, J E., Plane Strain Crack Toughness Testing of High
Strength Metallic Materials, ASTM STP 410, American Society for Testing and
Mate-rials, 1966
[6] Tsai, S W and Hahn, H T in Inelastic Behavior of Composite Materials, AMD Vol
13, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1975, pp 73-96
[7\ Cruse, T A and Osias, J R., "Exploratory Development on Fracture Mechanics of
Composite Materials," AFML-TR-74-111, Air Force Materials Laboratory, April 1974
[8] Waddoiips, M E., Eisenmann, J R., and Kaminski, B E., Journal of Composite
Materials, Vol 5, 1971, pp 446-454
[P] Nuismer, R J and Whitney, J M in Fracture Mechanics of Composites, ASTM STP
593, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1975, pp 117-142
[70] Whitney, J M and Nuismer, R J., Journal of Composite Materials, Vol 8, 1974, pp
Trang 30An Experimental Study of the
Fracture Behavior of Laminated
Graphite/Epoxy Composites
REFERENCE: Brinson, H F and Yeow, Y T., "An Experimental Study of the
Fracture Behavior of Laminated Graphite/Epoxy Composites," Composite Materials:
Testing and Design (Fourth Conference), ASTM STP 617, American Society for
Testing and Materials, 1977, pp 18-38
ABSTRACT: Tlie results of an experimental investigation on the fracture behavior of
unidirectional and multidirectional laminated graphite/epoxy composites is reported
Critical tensile fracture stresses for constant head rate uniaxial specimens containing
single-edge notches, double-edge notches, and centrally located circular holes are
presented Results are reported for loads and notches at various angles to the fiber
direction(s) Evidence of notch sensitivity and stable crack growth is presented
Self-similar crack growth is shown to occur for only a limited set of circumstances
Critical stresses are compared to the theories of Waddoups et al and Whitney et al
These comparisons are presented using isotropic and orthotropic stress concentration
factors together with a finite width correction factor The results tend to show that
use of only isotropic correction factors allow good correlation between theory and
experiment
KEY WORDS: composite materials, fracturing, graphite composites, epoxy laminates
The mathematical theory of Hnear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) is
well established for homogeneous isotropic and anisotropic materials
[1,2\} However, there remain many fundamental questions in regard to
the experimental determination of stress intensity factors {K) or strain
energy release rates (G) for particular crack geometries For example,
LEFM assumes a perfect crack of zero width and zero crack root radius
Obviously, such perfection is not possible in the laboratory As a result,
there is still some concern for isotropic materials as to what effects finite
crack tip radii have on G or A" and, especially, how close to the finite
' Professor and research associate, respectively Department of Engineering Science and
Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Va 24061
^The italic numbers in brackets refer to the list of references appended to this paper
Trang 31BRINSON AND YEOW ON GRAPHITE/EPOXY COMPOSITES 19
crack tip data can be collected and still be correlated to LEFM Even if
near perfect crack tip geometries are generated using fatigue to grow or
enlarge a small crack, a small region near the crack tip cannot be modeled
well by LEFM because of finite deformation and plasticity effects Thus,
for isotropic as well as anisotropic but homogeneous materials, a core
region adjacent to the crack tip, on the order of the size of the crack root
radius, must be excluded in any analysis using LEFM
In composite materials, the picture is much more complex These
materials are nonhomogeneous as well as anisotropic, and various
frac-ture mechanisms with separate but perhaps coupled fracfrac-ture energies must
be accounted for However, perhaps the single most complicating feature
of composite fracture is that self-similar crack growth is not likely to
occur even for unidirectional or symmetric angle-ply laminates In general,
without self-similar growth the usual methods of LEFM are not
appli-cable to any material
The early fracture theories of Waddoups et al [3], Cruse [4], and
Whit-ney et al [5,6] consider only self-similar crack growth Each of these
in-vestigators found that in order to use various fracture solutions for either
holes or cracks the crack length had to be adjusted to include an intense
energy region at each crack tip The size of the intense energy region had
to be found from experimental data
The more recent theories of Wu [7,8] and Sih [9,10] not only can be
used to predict critical load levels for crack growth, but they will predict
also the direction of crack propagation Wu's technique performs this
function by locating the intersection of the stress vector surface and the
failure surface (determined from unnotched biaxial tests) This calculation
must be made at some distance away from the crack tip to avoid singular
stress fields Sih's technique employs a strain energy density concept The
strain energy density and its derivative also must be found at some
dis-tance away from the crack tip to avoid singular stress fields Thus, while
each of these theories give non-self-similar crack growth predictions, the
size of an intense region must be known a priori or found from
experi-mental data
An approach due to Kulkarni and Rosen [11] uses a material science
approach to model crack growth normal to the crack plane Such crack
growth has been observed for both unidirectional and general laminates
[12] Without going into details, the size of a critical intense energy region
in the direction of the crack must be assumed In addition, the damage
zone normal to the crack is found from the analysis The approach does
attempt to incorporate material heterogenity into the analysis
Currently, other numerical approaches are being developed to include
material heterogenity One such example is that of Kanninen et al [73]
which is included in this publication
It is worth noting that each of the fracture theories mentioned require
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Sun Jan 3 20:09:22 EST 2016
Downloaded/printed by
University of Washington (University of Washington) pursuant to License Agreement No further reproductions authorized.
Trang 32experimentally determined moduli, failure stresses or strains, or fracture
information Thus, additional test programs are required to utilize the
various theories over and above those which are required normally for
LEFM This is due to the fact that current fracture approaches to
com-posites represent models containing at least two arbitrary parameters as
opposed to the usual one arbitrary parameter model of LEFM
Obviously, all the questions regarding the size of actual crack tip
geometries as opposed to assumed ideal crack tip geometries used in
frac-ture analyses are even more important for composite materials than for
other engineering materials This is reinforced by the fact that it is not
clear if laminated composite materials are notch sensitive as are metallic
and polymeric materials
From the preceding comments, it is clear that test programs must be
conducted to determine accurate properties and fracture information for
composite materials This investigation represents an effort to obtain
some of the required information The specific objective of this
investiga-tion was to measure critical fracture loads for both unidirecinvestiga-tional and
multidirectional notched composites with the load and the notch at various
orientations to the principal fiber direction In the process, it was
antici-pated that information would be obtained regarding notch sensitivity,
self-similar crack growth, stable crack growth, and fracture mechanisms
Further, comparison between experimental results and some fracture
theories was desired For this reason and for later reference, the theories
of Waddoups, Eisenmann, and Kaminski [3] and Whitney and Nuismer
[5,6] will be outlined briefly
In Ref 3, Waddoups et al modeled a circular flaw in a composite as
having two slits or cracks emanating symmetrically from either side of
the hole perpendicular to the load direction Even though the slits were
defined only as intense energy regions, they were modeled mathematically
as cracks using the Bowie crack solution [14] The latter can be written as
Kic = <r, sfl^fia/f) (1)
where
/Tic = opening mode critical stress intensity factor,
(T^ = critical remote load,
a = length of the intense energy region (or crack adjacent to the
hole), and
f(a/f) = function of the hole radius r
A table for f{a/f) values for an infinite plate for different hole sizes is
given in Ref 14 For a specimen with no hole,/(o/r) = 1.0 Therefore
- = Ka/r) (2)
Trang 33BRINSON AND YEOW ON GRAPHITE/EPOXY COMPOSITES 21
where ffo is the critical remote load for an unnotched tension specimen
Thus, given ao and tr,, for one size hole, critical stress intensity factors
can be calculated for other size holes using Eq 1 provided a/r values can
be found The a/r values were found using the elliptical hole analysis of
Griffith [75] which essentially determines the size of the intense energy
region or the value a
The fundamental idea is that using the results from one unnotched
tension test and one notched tension test, critical stresses for other size
holes can be calculated assuming K\<, and o remain constant An identical
procedure was used for slits For the case of holes, the size of the intense
energy region was found to be ^ 0 0 4 in.)
Whitney and Nuismer \5,6\ used quite a different technique to explain
the hole size effect in composites Their argument was that, while
dif-ferent size holes in an infinite plate have the same stress concentration
factor, the stress gradient is quite different for each That is, large stresses
are localized more closely to the edge of a small hole than a large hole As
a result, a critical defect is more likely to occur in a region of high stress
for a large hole Both a point stress and an average stress technique were
used The point stress criterion was given by
The quantity/(A^r°° /?) is a function of the hole size and the orthotropic
stress concentration factor for an infinite sheet, KT" The average stress
criterion was given by
<T 2(1 - R)
— = (4)
[2 - R' - R* + fiKr'',R)]
where R = r/r + Oo, Oo is the size of the damage zone and tr,., ao, and
fiKT°°,R) are as defined previously
The same technique was used identically for cracks except the stress
state in front of a crack was used instead of the stress state in front of a
hole Good correlation between theory and experiment was shown for a
variety of quasi-isotropic laminates [5,6]
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Sun Jan 3 20:09:22 EST 2016
Downloaded/printed by
University of Washington (University of Washington) pursuant to License Agreement No further reproductions authorized.
Trang 34Materials and Test Procedures
The materials studied in this investigation were manufactured by
Lock-heed (Sunnyvale, Calif.) from prepreg tapes composed of Hercules
(Magna, Utah) graphite AS fibers and epoxy resin 3501 The fundamental
properties of the fibers were 380 to 400 ksi tensile strength, 30 to 40 x
10' ksi elastic modulus, and 10 000 fibers/tow The resin was a hot-melt
1(X) percent soHds epoxy No properties of the resin were available The
resulting [0]ss and [0/±30/0]25 laminates were medium strength and
medium modulus composite materials Large 0.80-in thick plates were
received from which individual specimens were machined
Some effort was made to determine the best procedures for machining
specimens Diamond saws, tungsten carbide cutting tools, and ultrasonic
machining techniques were attempted Diamond saws were selected to
give the best surface for the amount of machine time required Surfaces
machined by the various techniques were examined with a scanning
elec-tron microscope (SEM) and various inherent flaws were found Figures la
and b are SEM photographs of a diamond and an ultrasonically machined
surface, respectively Also shown in Fig 1 are examples of typical flaws
which were found Figure la shows a near cyhndrical void, while Fig lb
shows a flaw which appears to be in a single ply and extending at an angle
to the interface between laminae
Uniaxial tension tests were performed on specimens with and without
flaws using an Instron testing machine After machining, all specimens
were stored in a desiccator until tested Specimens were allowed to sit and
stabilize to the test environment for at least 1 h prior to testing Test
temperatures were generally at a room temperature of approximately
75 °F, and the relative humidity was generally less than 60 percent
Specimens (1 in wide with ^^4.5 in between grips) with single-edge
notches, double-edge notches, and circular cutouts were tested Notched
specimens were tested generally at a head rate of 0.01 in./min Edge
notches were used as opposed to center notches, because notch widths
and notch tip geometries could be made much smaller using diamond
saws as opposed to end mills The notches were made with a 0.006-in
diamond saw with the resulting notch width of 0.0075 in The tip of the
notch was reasonably flat but with rounded corners One corner
consis-tently appeared to have a smaller radius than the other
All tests were conducted without tabs, using sandpaper between
epoxy-coated wedge grips, to minimize penetration of grip serrations into the
graphite/epoxy materials Unnotched data collected in this manner
corre-lated well with data collected by NASA-Ames using tabs [76]
Experimental Results
Uniaxial tension tests were performed on specimens containing
Trang 35single-BRINSON AND YEOW ON GRAPHITE/EPOXY COMPOSITES 23
(o) [OJs material—diamond machined surface at ^^5 deg to fibers, x 950
(b) [0/ ± 30/0]i, material—ultrasonically machined at >^^ to 0-deg fibers, x 200
(Arrows denote flaw tips and laminae interfaces.)
FIG 1—Inherent flaws in graphite/epoxy laminates
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Sun Jan 3 20:09:22 EST 2016
Downloaded/printed by
University of Washington (University of Washington) pursuant to License Agreement No further reproductions authorized.
Trang 36edge notches (SEN), inclined single-edge notches (ISEN), double-edge
notches (DEN), and centrally located holes Various aspect ratios, that is,
crack length or hole radius to plate width ratio, were used In the SEN
and DEN tests, the load was at various angles to the fiber direction(s)
with the notches at right angles to the load direction In the ISEN tests,
the load was similarly at various angles to the fiber direction(s), and the
notches were also at various angles to the applied load (All angle
designa-tions, henceforth, are measured from the load direction.)
Fracture planes for all tests on unidirectional laminates were in the
fiber direction In other words, fracture was primarily in the matrix
Figure 2 shows failure planes for two ISEN specimens Thus, in general
FIG 2—ISEN fracture planes for [45]2s specimens
non-self-similar fracture occurred for unidirectional laminates unless the
crack was machined to be in the fiber direction It might be noted that
longitudinal splitting was the fracture mode for all [0\is tests That is,
when the load was in the fiber direction of the zero fiber with the crack
normal to the fiber direction, fracture occurred parallel to the load in
every case This was due most likely to thickness variations and gripping
conditions The fracture loads are not thought, at this time, to represent
realistic material values
Fracture planes for all notched multidirectional laminates were generally
in the principal fiber direction except for the [0/ ± 30/0] tests For example,
in Fig 3 the fracture plane for a [90/± 60/90]2s specimen is shown to be
at right angles to the load and in the direction of the principal fibers
Fracture planes for the [0/ ± 30/0]2s specimen are shown in Fig 4, and it
can be seen that in these cases crack propagation was erratic but generally
normal to the load and principal fiber direction
In most cases, fracture appeared to occur at the smaller notch tip radii
Also, in nearly all general laminate tests, audible noise could be heard
substantially before fracture Also, in these cases, and in some
Trang 37unidirec-BRINSON AND YEOW ON GRAPHITE/EPOXY COMPOSITES 25
FIG i—Stable crock growth for [90/±60/90]2^ specimen
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Sun Jan 3 20:09:22 EST 2016
Downloaded/printed by
University of Washington (University of Washington) pursuant to License Agreement No further reproductions authorized.
Trang 38FIG A—Fracture planes for [0/ ±30/0)2^ DEN specimens
tional tests, visible and stable crack growth was observed That stable
growth was observed is evident from examination of successive 35-mm
photographs taken during fracture and shown in Figs 3 and 5 for a
[90/ ± 60/9O]2J S E N and DEN test, respectively Similar observations were
made in other tests Note that the stable growth shown by the
photomi-crograph of Fig 5 can be seen only in the outer ply Further note the
additional cracks somewhat above and below the notch tip and the jagged
appearance of the fracture surface Apparently, fracture occurred in inner
and outer plies at different times and directions While the general
ap-pearance of fracture is self-similar in a gross sense, and especially for the
outer plies, self-similar behavior was not the fracture mode on a local
level for the inner plies
The audible noise mentioned for the general-ply tests appeared to occur
in many cases in conjunction with a load reduction That is, at some point
prior to complete separation, load reduction would occur instantaneously
After a delay time, the load would again increase to its previous or a
higher value Repeated load reductions were observed in some cases as
typified by Fig 6
Trang 39BRINSON AND YEOW ON GRAPHITE/EPOXY COMPOSITES 27
The [90/±60/90]2 DEN specimen containing a 0.05-in length notch
on one side is shown in Fig 7 As may be observed, fracture occurred
at a considerable distance from the site of the machined notch In this
particular case, the specimen thickness at the crack tip was ^^.085 in.,
while its minimum value was 0.075 in at the fracture site Thus, the
aver-age areas at each location were about the same, that is, ^^.075 in.^ Thus,
it would appear that an inherent flaw existed at the minimum section
which was more critical than the machined notch One might infer from
this case that the material is not notch insensitive Obviously this is not
necessarily the case as the material is not a continuum and, as such, the
converse is likely to be true The real question is only the size of a critical
inherent flaw if one existed
Tests were performed on both types of laminated specimens
contain-ing circular holes of varycontain-ing sizes For unidirectional laminates, fracture
originated at the edge of the hole and propagated in the direction of the
fibers in each case For general laminates, fracture originated (in most
cases) at the edge of the hole and propagated in various directions
de-pending on the layup Figure 8 gives typical examples of fracture planes
for various [0/±30/0]2„ [45/15/75/45]2„ and [90/±60/90]2 specimens
Also note the [90/±60/90]!, specimen which separated at a location other
than the hole In this case, the thickness at the edge of the hole was
0.079 in and 0.074 in at one location where fracture occurred Thus,
even though the net area was smallest at the minimum section, fracture
occurred at the point where the specimen was the thinnest Again,
pre-sumably an inherent flaw at the fracture site was more critical than the
machined hole
The gross fracture stresses obtained in the various tests are shown in
Figs 9 through 12 and plotted as a function of aspect ratio The data
appear to be quite consistent except for the [OJss SEN and ISEN fracture
strengths Likely errors for the latter cases were discussed previously
From an examination of these results, it is apparent that the graphite/
epoxy laminates tested were notch sensitive Further, it is not unreasonable
to infer that some type of singular stress field (or extreme stress gradient)
does exist at the notch tip Critical gross stresses found for the [0]8s and
[0/±30/0]2s specimens containing holes are quite similar to those found
for double-edge notches Less similarities exist for the other cases
The ISEN data shown in Fig 10 indicate only a small variation of gross
failure stress with the angle of incHnation of the crack All the inclined
cracks were machined such that their horizontal projection was half the
plate width Thus, the results of Fig 10 tend to indicate that only the
horizontal projection of the inclined crack is of importance when
con-sidering angle cracks That is, the length and inclination of the crack is
relatively unimportant, and the length of the horizontal projection of the
crack tends to govern the fracture behavior
Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Sun Jan 3 20:09:22 EST 2016
Downloaded/printed by
University of Washington (University of Washington) pursuant to License Agreement No further reproductions authorized.