Compton 395 Materials 396 Specimen Preparation for Test 397 Laboratory Testing 399 Data Analysis and Test Results 400 Discussion of Results 403 Conclusions 407 Interlaminar Shear Fatigu
Trang 2COMPOSITE MATERIALS:
TESTING AND DESIGN
(THIRD CONFERENCE)
A conference sponsored by the AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS Williamsburg, Va., 21-22 March 1973
ASTM SPECIAL TECHNICAL PUBLICATION 546
C A Berg, F J McGarry, and S Y Elliott, coordinators
List price $39.75 04-546000-33
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS
1916 Race Street, Philadelphia, Pa 19103
Trang 3Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 70-185534
NOTE The Society is not responsible, as a body, for the statements and opinions advanced in this publication
Printed in Baltimore, Md
June 1974
Trang 4Foreword
The Third Conference on Composite Materials: Testing and Design was held 21-22 March 1973 in Williamsburg, Va Committee D-30 on High Modulus Fibers and Their Composites of the American Society for Testing and Materials sponsored the conference in conjunction with the Metallurgical Society of the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers C A Berg, University of Pittsburgh,
F J McGarry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and S Y EUiott, Douglas Aircraft Company, served as coordinators Most of the papers presented at the eight sessions are included in the volume which complements the first and
second conference publications, ASTMSTP 460 and ASTMSTP 497, Composite Materials: Testing and Design
Trang 6Analysis of the Flexure Test for Laminated Composite Materials—/ M
Whitney, C E Browning, and A Mair 30
Methods for Determining the Elastic and Viscoelastic Response of
Com-posite Materials—Z) F Sims and J C Hatpin 46
Validity of ±45 deg Laminate Test and Rail Shear Test 48
Experimental Results 56
Conclusions 60
Analysis, Testing, and Design of Filament Wound, Carbon-Carbon Burst
Tubes-i? C Renter, Jr and T R Guess 67
Analysis 69
Numerical Results and Discussion 75
Conclusions 82
Elastic Torsional Buckling of Thin-Walled Composite Cylinders—Z) E
Marlowe, G F Sushinsky, and H B Dexter 84
A Correlation Study of Finite-Element Modeling for Vibrations of
Com-posite Material Panels—£ A Thornton and R R Clary 111
Description of Correlation Study 112
Discussion of Results 118
Concluding Remarks 128
Trang 7Bundles and Unidirectional Fiber/Matrix Composites—5 L
Phoenix 130
Single-Fiber Tensile Strength Model 131
Generalized Fiber Bundle Strength Analysis 136
Probabilistic Tensile Failure Theories for Unidirectional Composites 143
Summary 149
Debonding of Rigid Inclusions in Plane Elastostatics—G P Sendeckyf 152
Basic Equations 154
Partially Bonded Elliptic Inclusion 155
Analysis and Discussion of Results 159
On the Determination of Physical Properties of Composite Materials by a
Three-Dimensional Finite-Element Procedure—S / Kang and
G M Rentzepis 166
The Finite-Element Method 167
Computation of the Elastic Constants 172
Applications 174
The Unidirectional Fiber Composite 174
The Lamellar Composite 180
The Short-Fiber Composite 180
Discussion 186
Laminate Strength—A Direct Characterization Procedure—£" M Wu and
J K Scheublein 188
Basic Procedures for Establishing Laminate Failure Criterion 189
Experimental Results and Discussion 202
Summary and Conclusion 206
Experimental Studies
Stress-Rupture Behavior of Strands of an Organic Fiber/Epoxy Matrix—
T T Chiao, J E Wells, R L Moore, and M A Hamstad 209
Experimental 210
Results 213
Analysis and Discussion 214
Conclusions 223
Effect of Temperature and Strain Rate on the Tensile Properties of
Boron-Aluminum and Boron-Epoxy Composites—Z) A Meyn 225
Methods of Fiber and Void Measurement in Graphite/Epoxy
Com-posites—£" alley, D Roylance, and N Schneider 237
Materials 238
Trang 8Experimental Methods 239
Discussion of Results 244
Conclusions 248
Evaluation of Experimental Methods for Determining Dynamic Stiffness
and Damping of Composite Materials—C W Bert and R R Clary 250
Experimental Techniques 251
Free Vibration 252 Pulse Propagation 254 Forced Vibration Response 257
Application to Composite-Material Structures 260
Conclusions 263
Environmental Effects
Effect of Salt Water and High-Temperature Exposure on Boron-Aluminum
Composites—// E Dardi and K G Kreider 269
Salt Exposure 271 High-Temperature Exposure 275
Conclusions 280
Effects of Moisture on the Properties of High-Performance Structural
Resins and Composites—C E Browning and J T Hartness 284
Materials and Experimental Procedures 285
Results and Discussion 288
Conclusions 302
Materials Parameters that Govern the Erosion Behavior of Polymeric
Composites in Subsonic Rain Environments—G F Schmitt, Jr 303
Apparatus Description 304
Polymeric Composites Erosion Behavior 306
Discussion and Conclusions 322
Lightning Protection for Composites—// T Clark 324
Evaluation of Candidate Coatings 325
Evaluation of Coatings on Boron/Epoxy Substrates 328
Evaluation of Coating Schemes on an F-4 Rudder 330
Evaluation of Coatings on a Simulated Boron/Epoxy Empennage
Structure 330 Conclusions 339
Fatigue and Fracture Behavior
Torsional Fatigue Behavior of Unidirectional Resin Matrix Composites—
R C Novak 345
Experimental Procedure 346
Results and Discussion 349
Conclusions 358
Trang 9Cutouts-iJ E Rowlands, I M Daniel, and J B Whiteside 361
Orthotropic Stress Analysis 362
Laminates 363 Geometric and Loading Effects 364
Summary and Conclusions 373
Crack-Tip Deformation Measurements Accompanying Fracture in Fibrous
and Laminar Composites—/ H Underwood 376
Procedures 377 Discussion of Results 380
Summary 391
Uniaxial, Biaxial, and Fatigue Properties of Polyester Fiber Glass—L H
Irwin, R A Dunlap, and P V Compton 395
Materials 396 Specimen Preparation for Test 397
Laboratory Testing 399
Data Analysis and Test Results 400
Discussion of Results 403
Conclusions 407
Interlaminar Shear Fatigue Characteristics of Fiber-Reinforced Composite
}A2Atx\a\s—R Byron Pipes 419
Interlaminar Shear Fatigue Results 423
Fiber Tension and Interlaminar Shear Fatigue 427
Conclusions 430
Wear Properties
Mechanical and Physical Properties of Advanced Composites—PV T
Freeman and G C Kuebeler 435
Evaluation of Graphite Fiber Reinforced Plastic Composites for Use in
Unlubricated Sliding Bearings—7? D Brown and W R Blackstone 457
Test Equipment 459 Bearing Specimens 460
Test Results 461 Discussion 468 Conclusions 474
Wear of Glass Fiber Reinforced Composite Material—^ L Ward 477
Experimental Procedure 478
Experimental Results 480
Discussion 492
Trang 10Metallic Composites
Effect of Filament-Matrix Interdiffusion on the Fatigue Resistance of
Boron-Aluminum Composites—/ R Hancock and G G Shaw 497
Materials 498 Experimental 498 Results 500 Discussion 504 Conclusions 505
The Notched Tensile Behavior of Metal Matrix Composites—Ậ M Prewo 507
Experimental 508 Results and Discussion 509
Conclusions 520
Reinforcement of Metals with Advanced Filamentary Composites—C T
Herakovich, J G Davis, and H B Dexter 523
Applications of Composite Reinforced Metals 524
Tensile Behavior of Boron/Epoxy Reinforced Metals 528
Concluding Remarks 541
Comparison of the Mechanical Behavior of Filamentary Reinforced
Aluminum and Titanium Alloys—/ / Toth 542
Experimental Procedures 544
Results and Discussion 546
Summary and Conclusions 558
Plastic Deformation Processing and Compressive Failure Mechanism in
Aluminum Composite Materials—il/ Chang and Ẹ Scala 561
Analytical Studies 563
Analytical Models and Calculated Results 564
Comparison with Experiments 571
' Test Results 587 Analytical Investigation 593
Trang 11Yielding of Bladder 616
Totally Plastic Bladder 619
Short-Term Failure Predictions 620
Numerical Evaluation 623
Conclusions 630
Development of a Unique Graphite/Epoxy Antenna Subreflector—£ Y
Robinson, R A Stonier, and C L Lofgren 632
Low-Weight, Impact-Resistant Helicopter Drive Shafts-/ E Figge,
J Henshaw, P A Roy, and E F Olster 651
Background and Philosophy 652
Drive Shaft Design Criteria 653
Drive Shaft Design 654
Fabrication 657
BalUstic and Mechanical Tests 657
Conclusions 660
Experimental Stress Intensity Factor Measurements in Orthotropic
Com-posites—/ Tirosh and C A Berg 663
Path Independent Integral 664
Numerical and Experimental Evaluations 666
Evaluation of the Method 668
Conclusions 672
Trang 12STP546-EB/Jun 1974
Introduction
The American Society For Testing and Materials in conjunction with the
Metallurgical Society of the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and
Petroleum Engineers and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, held
the Third Conference on Composite Materials: Testing and Design on 21-22
March 1973 in Williamsburg, Va The objectives of this conference were the
same as those of its organizing group (ASTM Committee D-30), that is, to
stimulate research and promote the understanding of the behavior of fibers and
their composites, including reexamination of conventional tests in the light of
structural design data requirements and composite properties Because the field
of advanced composites is so rapidly growing and changing, it is possible to meet
such broad objectives only insofar as the progress to date is concerned—and this
the Third Conference has done successfully The previous two similar
confer-ences were held in New Orleans in 1969 (STP 460) and Anaheim in 1971 (STP
497), and succeeding conferences will continue to be held as long as
encouragement of new developments continues to be needed This volume
includes most of the papers given at the conference—and because its eight
sessions (on testing methods, analytical treatments, experimental studies,
environmental effects, fatigue and fracture behavior, wear properties, metallic
composites, and aircraft applications) covered the total subject adequately in
both depth and breadth, it will make a valuable addition to the library of the
scientist, analyst, designer, or testing engineer who is seeking a better
understanding of the mechanical behavior of composites
The papers in this volume provide a focus on the design of engineering
applications of composite materials in industrial, military, and consumer uses;
the testing of such materials and products; and the service behavior and
performance of the products Contributions dealing with design and test
methods, fatigue and fracture phenomena, effects of environmental conditions,
friction and wear behavior, impact response, manufacturing technology, and
related topics are emphasized Both theoretical and experimental approaches are
described, and useful data are presented It is hoped that the dissemination of
the results of recent advancements and successes will encourage similar fallouts
to other commercial and military areas
Special thanks for the preliminary organization and scheduling of the
conference papers are due to the original chairmen Professor C A Berg,
University of Pittsburgh and Professor F J McGarry, of the Massachusetts
Trang 14L B Greszczuk ^
Microbuckling of Lamina-Reinforced
Composites
REFERENCE: Greszczuk, L B., "Microbuckling of Lamina-Reinforced
Com-posites," Composite Materials: Testing and Design (Third Conference), ASTM
STP546, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1974, pp 5-29
ABSTRACT: Compressive strength and failure modes of unidirectionally
lamina-reinforced composites were studied both theoretically and
experi-mentally The failure modes investigated included microbuckling and
com-pressive strength failure of the reinforcement The influence of the following
parameters on compressive strength was investigated experimentally: lamina
volume fraction, lamina end fixity, lamina thickness, specimen geometry, and
matrix properties The two-dimensional microbuckling theory showed good
correlation with test data from specimens designed to fail by microbuckling
As the Young's modulus of the matrix increased, the failure mode changed
from microbuckUng to compressive failure of the reinforcement
KEY WORDS: Composite materials, compression, microbuckling, reinforced
plastics, theories, microinstability, composite structures, failure, stresses
Nomenclature
2c Thickness of matrix between laminas (see Fig 1)
Ef Young's modulus of the reinforcement or laminas
Er Young's modulus of the matrix
Gr Shear modulus of the matrix
h Thickness of the reinforcement or laminas
k Volume fraction of reinforcement
L Length of composite specimen
m Number of buckle waves
P Compressive load
R Radius on the end of the laminas
T Thickness of composite specimen
' Staff engineer Advance Structures and Mechanical Department, McDonnell Douglas
Astronautics Company, Huntington Beach, Calif 92647
Trang 15W Width of composite specimen
X Parameter defining end fixity of reinforcement
acE Critical composite stress for microbuckling in the extension mode
acs Critical composite stress for microbuckling in the shear mode
Oe Euler column buckUng stress
Vf Poisson's ratio of the matrix
Reinforcement microbuckling as a plausible failure mechanism for
lamina-reinforced and fiber-lamina-reinforced composites subjected to compressive loading has
been studied by several investigators, including Biot[i],^ Rosen[2],
Schuerch[J], Hayashi[4], Chung and Testa [5], and others Most of the studies
are theoretical and are based on a mathematical model consisting of alternate
layers or laminas of reinforcement and matrix material, loaded in compression
parallel to the reinforcement direction A review of the theoretical work on the
problem is presented by Greszczuk[6,7]
To verify the validity and limitations of the microbuckling theory, extensive
experimental studies have been conducted on nearly perfect lamina-reinforced
model composites, the results of which are presented herein
Theoretical Considerations
For a two-dimensional composite model consisting of alternate layers of
laminar reinforcement and resin, two types of microbuckling failure can take
place if such a model is subjected to compressive loading parallel to the direction
of the reinforcement: microbuckling in the extension mode and microbuckling
in the shear mode The two failure modes are illustrated in Fig 1 Microbuckling
in the extension mode is governed by the following equation [2]:
•n^Efh^k 12L'
whereas microbuckling in the shear mode is predicted by
The various terms appearing in Eqs 1 and 2 are defined in the Nomenclature
and in Fig 1 For a composite made of a given combination of materials, the
composite stresses OCE and acs have to be minimized with respect to the
number of buckle waves, m, to give the minimum values of acs and acs- Por
^ The italic numbers in brackets refer to the list of references appended to this paper
Trang 16any given k, the smaller of the two values, OCE or (^CS> is the governing stress In
general, Eq 1 gives a lower microbuckling stress for A: < 0.10, whereas for
k > 0.10 the minimum stress is given by Eq 2 Inasmuch as in actual composites
the fiber volume fractions are usually greater than «0.10, only Eq 2 is of
practical interest
In deriving Eqs 1 and 2, it was assumed that the ends of the individual
laminas are simply supported If the laminas are not simply supported, then Eq 2
will be of the form [8]:
Gr , Ti^Efk /mh\
where X is dependent on the end fixity of the individual laminas Table 1 gives
the values of X as a function of LjTR, where L is the specimen length andR is
the radius of the end of the lamina For a lamina with square ends, R =°° and
therefore X = 4, which corresponds to a fixed-end condition For laminas with
rounded ends, 1 < X < 4, depending on the value of JR Fori? = 0, X = 1, which
corresponds to laminas with simply supported ends
50 1.04
CXI
1
Trang 17It can be readily seen that if the composite is long {L ^^h), the second term
in Eq 3 has a negligible influence on 0^5, and therefore the influence of lamina
end restraints is unimportant If, however, the composite test specimen is of
such geometry that the second term in Eq 2 is not negligible, then end
conditions of the laminas will influence ffc5 and have to be taken into account
Most of the specimens tested were of such geometry that the second term in
Eq 2 was not negligible, and end conditions of the laminas did influence
acs-Experimental Studies on Microbuckling of Lamina-Reinforced Composites
To establish the validity of the microbuckling theory, the influence of the
following parameters on the compressive microbuckling strength of
lamina-reinforced composites was investigated; lamina end fixity, lamina volume
fraction, specimen geometry, lamina thickness, and matrix properties In all
models the lamina reinforcement was 6061-T6 aluminum strips The matrix
materials used were a urethane resin with a Young's modulus of ~2.5 ksi and
two different epoxy resin formulations with Young's moduli of approximately
23 and 62 ksi, respectively
The dimensions of the test specimens were selected such that the specimens
would fail by microbuckling rather than by Euler column buckling With the
lamina-reinforced composites that were tested, the relationship between the
critical Euler buckling stress, a^, and the critical microbuckling stress, acs, for
microbucking in the shear mode is [8]:
id
\k(l -k)n^Ef — (-)
2
For a typical specimen with L = 2.5 in., h =0.0195 in., Ef= 10.1 X 10* psi,
Gf = 904 p&i,k = 0.50, and T = 1.0 in., evaluation of Eq 4 gives
ffe = 322acs Even for composites with a low-volume fraction of laminas (k = 0.16), the term
in front of acs was greater than 100 Further discussion of the design of test
specimens is presented in [8]
Influence of Lamina End Restraints
To verify experimentally the influence of lamina end restraints on the
compressive strength of composites, four composites were fabricated and tested
Two contained laminas with square ends, and two contained laminas with
rounded ends Figure 2 shows the two types of composites The laminas were
Trang 18GRESZCZUK ON MICROBUCKLING
FIG 2-Lamina-reinforced composites with lamina ends corresponding to fixed and
simply supported conditions
made of 0.040-in.-thick 6061-T6 aluminum strips, while the matrix was a
urethane resin with average Young's modulus of «*2385 psi The laminas were
spaced to give a reinforcement volume fraction of «>0.50 The rounded ends of
the laminas had a radius of 0.025 in., and the specimen length, L, was 2.5 in
Consequently, for composites reinforced with round-ended laminas, X= 1.04,
which is close to the condition of simply supported ends (See Table 1.)
The test results as well as the test-theory comparison are given in Table 2 It is
seen that excellent agreement exists between test and theory Moreover, the
results show that, for the models used, the influence of lamina end restraint is
not negligible and has to be taken into account
Influence of Reinforcement Volume Fraction
To estabUsh the influence of reinforcement volume fraction on compressive
strength, lamina-reinforced composites with the following average reinforcement
volume fractions were fabricated and tested in compression: k = 16.2, 24.6,
32.1, 48.4, 65.0, and 75.3 percent The reinforcing material consisted of
»'0.0195-in.-thick 6061-T6 aluminum strips; the matrix material was urethane
Trang 19TABLE 1-Influence of end restraint on microbuckling of
Square Round Square Round
Lamina Thickness,
in
0.0399 0.0399 0.0422 0.0420
Reinforcement Volume, % 48.7 48.7 51.4 50.0
Composite Stress at Failure Test, psi
2490
2490
2280
2280
" Specimens consisted of a!0.040-in,-thick aluminum laminas embedded in soft urethane
resin The nominal dimensions of composite specimens IR and IF were: 0.465 in
(thickness) by 2.00 in (width) by 2.50 in (length); the corresponding dimensions for
composite specimens 2F and 2R were: 1.00 in by 2.05 in by 2.50 in Specimens were
tested in the direction of a 2.50-in dimension
* The theoretical values were calculated from Eq 3 For composites made with round-ended
laminas, X was taken as 1.04; for composites made with square-ended laminas, \ was taken
as 4
resin Figure 3 shows several lamina-reinforced composites with various
reinforcement volume fractions The nominal dimensions of the test specimens
were 1.0 by 2.0 by 2.5 in Typical failures of the specimens are shown in Figs 4
and 5 Figure 4a shows the failure of a composite containing 24.4 percent
reinforcement by volume, while Fig Ab shows the failure of a composite with
64.7 percent of reinforcement by volume The dimensions of the specimens
shown in Fig 4a were, approximately, 2.5-in height by 2.0-in width by 1.0-in
thickness To ensure that the failure modes of the specimens tested were
representative of composites, a wide specimen (3.71 in wide, 0.10 in thick, and
2.50 in long) was also fabricated and tested The failure mode of this specimen
(Fig 5) was similar to those shown in Fig 4 Typical load-deflection curves for
composites with various volume fractions of laminas are shown in Fig 6
The comparison of measured compressive strength values with the results
predicted by the two-dimensional microbuckling theory is shown in Fig 7
Inasmuch as the composites shown in Fig 3 were made with square-ended
laminas, it was assumed that X = 4, which corresponds to the fixed-end condition
of individual laminas With this value of \ Eq 3 for the critical composite stress
for microbuckling in the shear mode becomes
,a^^'JMl
"«-i^*^(|-) <«
The curve segment for microbuckling in the extension mode was calculated
from Eq 1 The curve segment corresponding to microbuckling in the shear
Trang 22mode was calculated from Eq 5 using the average properties (E,- and v^) of the
matrix The average properties of the matrix were obtained from the same resin
batches as those used to make the various composites The resin castings were
co-cured with the various composite models and were tested for mechanical
properties at approximately the same time as the various composites Resin
properties shown in Fig 7 are an average from all the resin castings that were
prepared and tested The average values for Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio
were Ef = 2650 psi and Vf = 0.466
The fact that theory (which assumes microbuckling failure) and test results
show good agreement leads to the conclusion that the failure of the specimens
for which data are presented in Fig 7 was by microbuckling Moreover, the
results shown in Fig 7 verify the accuracy of the two-dimensional microbuckling
theory for predicting the microbuckling compressive strength of
lamina-rein-forced composites As demonstrated in[S], the test-theory correlation can be
improved from that shown in Fig 7 by normalizing the test data with respect to
the average properties of the matrix By normalizing the test data, the variations
of matrix properties from specimen to specimen can be accounted for
That numerous buckle waves were not observed in the specimens described
here (Figs 4 and 5) is apparent from Eqs 1 and 2 Numerous buckle waves will
Trang 23% T - 0 3 9 9 IN
h - 0J)19S IN
0.03 DEFLECTION (IN.I
( s ) MACHINE STOPPED AND
^ LOAD REVERSED
0.02 DEFLECTION (IN.I
DEFLECTIONS WERE OBTAINED FROM MACHINE HEAD TRAVEL
LOAD RATE WAS 0.0S IN./MIN
FIG 6-Load-deflection curves for lamina-reinforced composites containing various
volume fractions of reinforcement
Trang 24MICROBUCKLING IN THE SHEAR MODE, (EQUATION (5) IN TEXT)
•MICROBUCKLING IN EXTENSION MODE (EQUATION (1) )
form in the specimen only if microbuckling is in the extension mode, which
requires that the reinforcement volume fraction be less than ^sS percent[J,5] ^
All the specimens tested here contained reinforcement volume fraction equal to
or greater than k= \6 percent Thus these specimens buckled in one buckle
wave, m = \, which minimizes acs given by Eq 2 and 5 By making
lamina-reinforced composites wdth k<\0 percent, several buckle waves were
here
^ For composites with E^lEy ratio of «>4000, which applies to the specimens discussed
Trang 25observed in Ref J, as one would expect from examination of Eq 1 To make
ocE given by Eq 1 a minimum requires that m> \ Because composites with
low fiber volume fraction are of little practical interest, no experiments for
microbuckling in the extension mode were performed
Influence of Reinforcement Thickness
Compression tests were performed on composites made with urethane resin
and reinforced with lamina of three different nominal thicknesses: 0.0118,
0.0195, and 0.0415 in The specimens contained approximately 49 percent
reinforcement by volume and were similar to those shown in Fig 3 The
specimen dimensions were selected so that the length-to-lamina thickness ratio
remained approximately constant A detailed description of the test specimens
as well as the test data is presented in [8] The effects of lamina thickness on
compressive strength of composites are summarized in Table 3
Inasmuch as there were variations in Young's moduli of the resins used in
various specimens, as well as variations in L/h and k, the test data have been
normalized with respect to average properties, as shown in Table 3 The results
given in Table 3 do not show any apparent influence of the absolute lamina
thickness on the compressive strength of lamina-reinforced composites This
conclusion can also be drawn from the results presented in the following section
The failure modes of composites made with laminas of various thicknesses were
simOar to those shown in Figs 4 and 5
Influence of Specimen Geometry
To establish the relative influence of the first and second terms in Eq 5 on the
microbuckling compressive strength of lamina-reinforced composites, the
TABLE 3-^Effect of lamina thickness on compressive strength of composites
Trang 26GRESZCZUK ON MICROBUCKLING 17
geometry of the test specimens was varied The primary variables were specimen
length and lamina thickness (while specunen width and thickness remained
constant) Several tests were also performed on specimens in which the specimen
length and width remained constant and the specimen thickness varied Figure 8
shows several of the test specimens, while the compressive failure of one of the
specimens is shown in Fig 9
The test data on the influence of specimen geometry on compressive strength
of composites are presented in Figs 10, 11, and 12 Figure 10 shows the effect
of specimen length on the compressive strength of composites made with
urethane resin and reinforced with «s0.0193-in.-thick aluminum strips, while
Fig 11 shows similar data for composites made with '*'0.0411-in.-thick
aluminum laminas The test data shown in the latter two figures were normaUzed
for average resin properties and a reinforcement content of 50 percent [8] The
solid curves in Figs 10 and 11 were calculated from Eq 5 using average resin
properties and a reinforcement content of 50 percent By plotting the
compressive stress in composites as a function of (-7-) , the theoretical curves in
Figs 10 and 11 can be made to converge Figure 12 shows such a plot It also
contains test data from previous sections for composites with various L/h ratios
As shown in Figs 10, 11, and 12, as Z, and L/h increase, the compressive
stress, Oc, of the composite asymptotically approaches a constant value given by
the first term of Eq 5, that is, by
r-V (6)
which is only a function of the shear modulus of the matrix and the volume
fraction of the reinforcement Conversely, as L and L/h decrease, the second
term in Eq 5 becomes dominant For the latter case (L/h,L-> O), the
compres-sive microbuckling strength is governed by the properties of the reinforcement
and is relatively insensitive to the properties of the matrix For composites with
anall values of Z,, the compressive microbuckling strength is also strongly
affected by the lamina end restraints, as discussed previously
As shown in Fig 12, the test data show a good correlation with the
theoretical values predicted from Eq 5 These results further confirm the vaUdity
of the two-dimensional microbuckling theory for lamina-reinforced composites
It is shown that, by varying L and h but keeping L/h approximately constant,
the test data for composites made with laminas of various thicknesses fall close
together This behavior further shows the insensitivity of the compressive
microbuckling strength of lamina-reinforced composites to the absolute
thick-ness of the laminas
Trang 28GRESZC2UK ON MICROBUCKLING 19
•;ili:\;i'rlTli
nil-•• " • • i » • • : ; - i l - k ! - 1 '-Ill - 1- nil-••nil-•• 111
* • » • • ii' ' i'.i
FIG 9-Compressive failure of lamina-reinforced composite made with urethane resin
and 0.0195-in.-thick aluminum laminas in the amount ofk = 48.8 percent (L = 4.75 in.)
Trang 29THEORY BASED ON THE FOLLOWING AVERAGE PROPERTIES:
MICROBUCKLING FAILURE PREDICTED FROM EQ (5)
837 PSI 0.0193 IN
0 5 0
1 0 1 X 10^ PSI
-o-J 2"
SPECIMEN LENGTH, L , inches
FIG lO-Effect of specimen length on compressive microbuckling strength of
composites made with 0.0193-in.-thick Utminas
Influence of Resin Properties
To establish the influence of resin properties on the microbuckling
compressive strength of lamina-reinforced composites, additional composites
made with epoxy resin formulations, denoted here as Resins B and C, v/ere
prepared The average Young's modulus of Resin B was approximately 23 ksi,
while for Resin C the Young's modulus was ~62 ksi The reinforcement for
these composites consisted of 0.0195 in.-thick 6061-T6 aluminum strips
Composites with three different reinforcement volume fractions were fabricated
and tested A complete description of the test specimens and the test data is
Trang 30r'
• THEORY BASED ON THE FOLLOWING AVERAGE PROPERTIES:
837 PSI O.Olill IN
0.50 10.1 X 10" PSI
It 6 8 SPECIMEN LENGTH, L, inches
10
FIG 11—Effect of specimen length on compressive microbuckling strength of oosites made with 0.041 l-in.-thick laminas
com-^resented in [5] Figure 13 shows the compressive strength of lamina-reinforced
:omposites as a function of reinforcement volume fraction and Young's modulus
'or the resin For comparison, previously discussed results on composites made
vith urethane resin are also shovm therein
The composites made with urethane resin (E «* 2500 psi), failed by
micro-juckling The composites made with Resin B (Ef ~ 22 990 psi) failed by
nicrobuckling; however, the buckle wavelength was shorter than that in
;omposites made with urethane resin, as can be seen by comparing Figs 4 and
14 Composites made with Resin C (Er «* 62 380 psi) failed in a complex maimer,
IS shown in Fig 15 The failure was by transverse tension, resin shear, overall
Trang 32FIG 13-Test results on effect of matrix properties on compressive microbuckling strength of lamina-reinforced composites
Trang 35composite shear, reinforcement yielding, and possibly by inelastic
micro-buckling The reinforcement stresses at failure ranged from 50 100 to 57 700
psi, depending on the volume fraction of the reinforcement These stresses are
significantly higher than the compressive yield strength or the compressive
ultimate strength of 6061-T6 aluminum sheet, which are 35 000 and '^=45 000
psi, respectively (Ref/O) A comparison of experimental results for
lamina-reinforced composites made with different resins with theoretical results
predicted from E q 5 is shown in Figs 16 and 17 Figure 16 shows the
compressive failure stress in the composite as a function of shear modulus of the
resin The horizontal portion of the curve was calculated assuming compressive
failure of the reinforcement given by the following approximate equation"*
[^^|(1-^)]
(Oc)u = Ofu\k+-^(l-k)\ (7)
where (0^)1/ is the ultimate compressive strength of the composite, and Ofi/ is
the ultimate compressive strength of the reinforcement Figure 17 shows the
test-theory comparison for the reinforcement stress in the composite at failure
of the composite as a function of the shear modulus of the resin By plotting
reinforcement stress, Of, rather than composite stress Oc, test data for
composites with ^ « 32 percent and k^ 65 percent can be plotted on the same
graph, inasmuch as the term k(l — k) is approximately the same for the two
cases
Conclusions
On the basis of results presented herein, it can be concluded that the
two-dimensional theory, corrected for the influence of end restraints, accurately
predicts microbuckling compressive failure of lamina-reinforced composites It
can be further concluded that the mode of failure is influenced by the properties
of the reinforcement, the properties of the matrix, and the volume fraction of
the reinforcement For composites made with low-modulus resins, failure is by
microbuckling, but, as the modulus of the resin increases, the composite failure
stresses are governed by the compressive strength of the reinforcement
' A better approximation for (CTc)f/is
where, in addition to the terms defined in the text, Oy* is the stress in the resin
corresponding to the strain in the reinforcement at ofi/ This equation was not used because
complete compressive stress-strain curves were not available for laminas The assumptions
made in using Eq 7 are obvious
Trang 37isd j o T X aamivJ xv ssaats wiawaoacwKiaH aAissaH<)woo
Trang 38GRES2CZUK ON MICROBUCKLING 29
Acknowledgment
The work described herein was sponsored by the Air Force Materials
Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, Wright
Patterson AFB, Ohio, under contract F33615-71-C-1399
References
[1] Biot, M A., Mechanics of Incremental Deformation, Wiley, New York, 1965
[2\ Rosen, B W in Fiber Composite Materials, American Society for Metals, Metals Park,
Ohio, 1965, Chapter 3
[3] Schuerch, H., Journal, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Vol 4,
No 1, Jan 1966, pp 102-106
[4] Hayashi, T., "On the Shear Instability of Structures Caused by Compressive Loads,"
AIAA Paper No 65-770, presented at the Joint Meeting of The American Institute of
Aeronautics and Astronautics, the Royal Aeronautical Society, and The Japan Society
for Aeronautics and Space Science, Aircraft Design and Technology Meeting, Los
Angeles, CaUf., Nov 1965
[5\ Chung, Wen-Yi and Testa, R B., Journal of Composite Materials, Vol 3, Jan 1969,
pp 58-80
[6] Greszczuk, L B in Analysis of the Test Methods for High-Modulus Fibers and
Composites, ASTM STP 521, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1973,
pp 192-217
[7] Greszczuk, L B., "Microbuckling of Unidirectional Composites," Air Force Materials
Laboratory Report AFML-TR-71-231, Jan 1972
[8] Greszczuk, L B., "Failure Mechanics of Composites Subjected to Compressive
Loading," Air Force Materials Laboratory Report AFML-TR-72-107, Aug 1973
[9] Timoshenko, S P and Gere, J M., Theory of Elastic Stability, McGraw-Hill, New
York, 1961
[10] "Metallic Materials and Elements for Aerospace Vehicle Structures," MIL-HDBK-5A,
Department of Defense, Waslyngton, D C , Feb 1966
Trang 39Analysis of the Flexure Test for
Laminated Composite Materials*
REFERENCE: Whitney, J M., Browning, C E., and Mair, A., "Analysis of the
Flexure Test for Laminated Composite Materials," Composite Materials:
Testing and Design (Third Conference), ASTMSTP546, American Society for
Testing and Materials, 1974, pp 30-45
ABSTRACT: Equations applicable to a general class of symmetrically
lami-nated beams ate derived by considering a beam as a special case of a lamilami-nated
plate The beam bending stiffness thus becomes a function of all the bending
stiffness coefficients of a laminated plate The validity of this approach is
verified by comparing theoretical results to flexure data on graphite/epoxy
angle-ply and quasi-isotropic laminates In addition, it is shown that flex
strength on general composite laminates is extremely difficult to interpret,
even though the stresses can be calculated from the modified beam theory
Discontinuities in the in-plane stresses at layer interfaces lead to a state of
stress which is difficult to compare to standard laminate tensile coupons
KEY WORDS: composite materials, laminates, beam theory, bend tests,
anisotropy, angle ply composites
Bending properties of composite materials are often characterized by using
simply supported beams under concentrated loads at the center or
quarter-points Results from such tests are commonly based on homogeneous isotropic
beam equations For laminated materials these formulas must be modified to
account for the stacking sequence of the individual plies It has been shown by
Hoff[7]^ and Pagano[2] that layered beams in which the plies are oriented
symmetrically about the mid-plane and the orthotropic axes of material
symmetry in each ply are parallel to the beam edges can be analyzed by classical
* This work is based on both an in-house research project sponsored by the Mechanics
and Surface Interactions Branch, Nonmetallic Materials Division, Air Force Materials
Laboratory and a thesis submitted to the Air Force Institute of Technology by A Mair for
the Master of Science degree
' Materials research engineer, research chemist, and graduate student, respectively, Air
Force Materials Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 45433
^The italic numbers in brackets refer to the list of references appended to this paper
Trang 40WHITNEY ETAL ON THE FLEXURE TEST 31
beam theory if the bending stiffness EI is replaced by the equivalent stiffness
El 1 ^/ defined in the following manner:
^ 1 1 / = £ Ei^kik (1)
where £"11 ^^ is the effective bending modulus of the beam, £"11^ is the modulus
of the kt\\ layer relative to the beam axis, / is the moment of inertia of the beam
relative to the midplane, I^ is the moment of inertia of the kih layer relative to
the midplane, and n is the number of layers in the laminate
In addition to being used as a quality control and materials acceptance test on
unidirectional materials, the flexure specimen has been used to characterize the
modulus and strength of laminates constructed of angle-ply orientations [5,¥,5]
Equations which are applicable to beams constructed of angle-ply layers are
nonexistent
In the present paper equations which are applicable to a general class of
symmetric laminates are derived by considering a beam as a special case of a
laminated plate In light of the actual specimen dimensions employed in
composite flexure experiments, such an assumption seems justified The validity
of this approach is verified by comparing theoretical results to flexure data on
graphite/epoxy angle-ply and quasi-isotropic laminates Results show that flex
strength on general composite laminates is extremely difficult to interpret, even
though the stresses can be calculated from a modified beam theory
Disconti-nuities in the in-plane stresses at layer interfaces lead to a state of stress which is
difficult to compare to standard laminate tensile coupons
Analysis
The constitutive relations for the bending of a laminated anisotropic plate of
thickness h are of the form [6]
(2)
where Mx, My, Mxy are the resultant bending and twisting moments per unit
length, Kx, Ky, Kxy are the bending and twisting curvatures of the plate, and Djf
are the plate bending stiffnesses In terms of the anisotrojjic reduced stiffnesses
for plane stress, Qij, the bending stiffnesses are of the form
•h/2
•>-h/2
(3)