The Case for Free Trade Jagdish Bhagwati Copyright 1993 Scientific American, Inc... One unanswered ques-tion is whether the particles themselves 26 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN November 1993 PART
Trang 1NOVEMBER 1993
$3.95
Silicon switch provides deft control over electrical power ßow, enhancing grid eÛciency and reliability.
Reading the genes of extinct species.
Observing cannibal stars.
Can the environment survive free trade?
Copyright 1993 Scientific American, Inc
Trang 2November 1993 Volume 269 Number 5
environmen-Unless all producers and consumers are directly liable for the cost of mental damage, free trade can seriously endanger the ecosystem Manufacturerscan move capital to regions unprotected by strong environmental laws JobsÑand degradation of air, water and the biosphereÑwill rapidly be exported there
environ-Every thought, every voluntary action, begins when a neurotransmitter, releasedinto a synapse, locks with its corresponding receptor The receptor changesshape, causing the neuron to become permeable to ions As the ions move, theychange the electrical potential of the cell, causing a wave of current to run down
it How binding to a receptor can induce ionic ßow is now becoming clear
Most of the stars that pierce the night sky glow because of the fusion of atomicnuclei But some double stars produce outpourings of x-rays through an evenmore eÛcient process These systems often contain a tiny neutron star and amuch larger companion The neutron starÕs powerful gravitational Þeld pulls gasfrom the other star As the material gathers, it grows so hot that it emits x-rays
4
72
X-ray Binaries
Edward P J van den Heuvel and Jan van Paradijs
A half century ago this ŽmigrŽ from Ukraine began to fashion his vision of century civilization, in which humans and machines grew to resemble each oth-
20th-er as the agents of war and peace shaped their mast20th-ersÕ lives
S CIENCE IN PICTURES
The Art of Boris ArtzybasheÝ
Domenic J Iacono
D EBATE: DOES FREE TRADE HARM THE ENVIRONMENT?
The Case for Free Trade
Jagdish Bhagwati
Copyright 1993 Scientific American, Inc.
Trang 3After decades of sincere, earnest eÝort to engage women in science, the sion resists their admission into its informal clubs and networks more com-pletely than does almost any other The reasons range from sexism and the tra-ditions of mentoring to the expectations that teachers and other adults harborfor girls and boys in the earliest years of school.
profes-D E PARTM E N T S
50 and 100 Years Ago
1893: The Edison inventionthat didnÕt get oÝ the ground
Letters to the Editor
Gnashings over nature versusnurture Normal abnormals
Science and the Citizen
Science and Business
Book Reviews
A cultivated look at the ical roots of mental illness
biolog-Essay :Bruce Russett
Rxfor global peace: a world
Research chemists seek kinder lysts Hardening airliners Soft-ware skipper A one-horse race for
cata-an AIDS vaccine Regenerate thedentin and pass the Godiva THEANALYTICAL ECONOMIST: Ivy Leaguebonus babies
T RENDS IN THE SOCIOLOGY OF SCIENCE
A Lab of Her Own
Marguerite Holloway, staÝ writer
High-Power Electronics
Narain G Hingorani and Karl E Stahlkopf
Consumers of electrical power demand both quality and quantity The existingtechnology for controlling the ßow of power through the nationÕs grid presents
a choice between economy and spotty performance or waste and reliability Tothe rescue come semiconductor switching devices
rights reserved No part of this issue may be reproduced by any mechanical, photographic or electronic process, or in the form of a phonographic recording, nor may it be stored in a retrieval system, transmitted or otherwise copied for public or private use without written permission of the publisher Second-class postage paid at New York, N.Y., and at additional mailing offices Authorized as second-class mail by the Post Office Department, Ottawa, Canada, and for payment of postage in cash Canadian GST No R 127387652 Subscription rates: one year
$36 (outside U.S and possessions add $11 per year for postage) Subscription inquiries: U.S and Canada 800-333-1199; other 515-247-7631 Postmaster : Send address changes to Scientific American, Box 3187, Harlan, Iowa 51537 Reprints available: write Reprint Department, Scientific American, Inc., 415 Madison Avenue, New York, N.Y 10017-1111, or fax : (212) 355-0408.
Copyright 1993 Scientific American, Inc.
Trang 460 Jean-Louis Dubois/ Jacana
60FÐ62 Dimitry Schidlovsky
65 Alfred T Kamajian
66Ð70 Jared Schneidman
72Ð73 Courtesy of the University
Art Collection, Syracuse
University
74Ð75 Courtesy of Dodd, Mead
& Company, © 1954
(top center ), Syracuse
University (left and right)
92 Thomas Stephan/Black Star
94Ð95 The MIT Museum (left),
Jessica Boyatt (right)
96Ð97 top: Courtesy of Cheryl
Ann Butman; Chris Smith/
U.S Department of Healthand Human Services; JimStarford/Black Star ; Mar-guerite Holloway ; GeorgiaLitwack ; courtesy of Deb-
orah Gordon; bottom:
Bett-mann Archive; courtesy
of …Ýentliche lung Kupferstichkabinett,Basel ; Steve Murez/BlackStar ; painting by HermioneDassel (1851), courtesy
Kunstamm-of Vassar College Archives;
Bettmann Archive; Caroline
L Hunt, The Life of Ellen H
Richards, Boston (1912)
98Ð99 top: Georgia Litwack ;
Georgia Litwack ; GeorgiaLitwack ; Ricardo Azoury/
SABA; John Reader, SciencePhoto Library/Photo Re-searchers, Inc.; Sam Mc-Naughton, courtesy ofNYZS The Wildlife Con-
servation Society; bottom:
Bettmann Archive; mann Archive; UPI /Bett-mann; UPI /Bettmann;
Bett-Bettmann Archive; courtesy
of Marine Biology tory, Woods Hole, Mass
Labora-100Ð101 top: AP World Wide Photos;
Schurlock Studio; KatherineLambert ; Per Breiehagen/
Black Star ; Georgia wack; courtesy of Carol
Lit-Wood ; bottom: Joseph ner from Nobel Prize Women
Lar-in Science, by Sharon Bertsch
McGrayne, Birch Lane Press,1993; UPI /Bettmann; UPI /Bettmann; UPI /Bettmann;
UPI /Bettmann; Donald L D
Caspar from Nobel Prize
Women in Science
112 Patricia J Wynne114Ð115 Johnny Johnson
THE ILLUSTRATIONS
Cover image by Michael Goodman
EDITOR: Jonathan Piel
BOARD OF EDITORS: Michelle Press, Managing
Editor ; John Rennie, Russell Ruthen, Associate Editors; Timothy M Beardsley ; W Wayt Gibbs;
Marguerite Holloway ; John Horgan , Senior
Writ-er ; Philip Morrison, Book Editor ; Corey S Powell;
Philip E Ross; Ricki L Rusting ; Gary Stix ; Paul Wallich ; Philip M Yam
ART: Joan Starwood, Art Director ; Edward Bell,
Art Director , Graphics Systems ; Jessie Nathans, Associate Art Director ; Johnny Johnson, Assistant Art Director, Graphics Systems; Nisa Geller, Pho- tography Editor ; Lisa Burnett, Production Editor
COPY: Maria-Christina Keller, Copy Chief; Nancy
L Freireich; Molly K Frances; Daniel C SchlenoÝ
PRODUCTION: Richard Sasso, Vice President,
Production ; William Sherman, Production ager ; Managers: Carol Albert, Print Production ;
Man-Janet Cermak , Quality Control ; Tanya DeSilva ,
Prepress; Carol Hansen , Composition ; Madelyn
Keyes, Systems; Eric Marquard, Special Projects; Leo J Petruzzi , Manufacturing & Makeup; Ad
TraÛc: Carl Cherebin
CIRCULATION: Lorraine Leib Terlecki, Circulation
Director ; Joanne Guralnick , Circulation tion Manager ; Rosa Davis, FulÞllment Manager ;
Promo-Katherine Robold , Newsstand Manager ADVERTISING: Robert F Gregory, Advertising
Director OFFICES: NEW YORK: Meryle
Lowen-thal, New York Advertising Manager ; William Buchanan, Manager, Corporate Advertising ; Pe-
ter Fisch, Randy James, Elizabeth Ryan Michelle
Larsen, Director, New Business Development.
CHICAGO: 333 N Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL
60601; Patrick Bachler, Advertising Manager.
DETROIT: 3000 Town Center, Suite 1435,
South-Þeld, MI 48075; Edward A Bartley, Detroit
Man-ager WEST COAST: 1554 S Sepulveda Blvd., Suite 212, Los Angeles, CA 90025; Kate Dobson,
Advertising Manager ; Tonia Wendt Lisa K
Car-den, Lianne Bloomer, San Francisco CANADA: Fenn Company, Inc DALLAS: GriÛth Group
MARKETING SERVICES: Laura Salant, Marketing
Director ; Diane Schube, Promotion Manager ;
Mary Sadlier, Research Manager ; Ethel D Little,
Advertising Coordinator
INTERNATIONAL: EUROPE: Roy Edwards,
Inter-national Advertising Manager, London; Vivienne
Davidson, Linda Kaufman, Intermedia Ltd., is; Karin OhÝ, Groupe Expansion, Frankfurt ;
Par-Barth David Schwartz, Director, Special
Proj-ects, Amsterdam SEOUL: Biscom, Inc TOKYO: Nikkei International Ltd.; Hoo Siew Sai , Major Media Singapore Pte Ltd.
ADMINISTRATION: John J Moeling, Jr., Publisher ; Marie M Beaumonte, Business Manager
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC
415 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10017 (212) 754-0550 PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER: John J Hanley
CHAIRMEN OF THE BOARD: Dr Pierre Gerckens, John J Hanley
CHAIRMAN EMERITUS: Gerard Piel
CORPORATE OFFICERS: Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Ỏcer, R Vincent
Bar-ger ; Vice Presidents: Jonathan Piel , John J.
Moeling, Jr.
PRINTED IN U.S.A
THE COVER image depicts an trolled thyristor, a device for handling high-voltage electricity Current entering andleaving the device is represented by thebright, glowing regions Thyristors combinehigh-power electronics with the same kinds
MOS-con-of silicon fabrication techniques used tomake integrated circuits By increasing thecapacity of high-voltage transmission lines,utilities could defer up to $50 billion inspending over the next 30 years (see Ị High-Power Electronics,Ĩ by Narain G Hingoraniand Karl E Stahlkopf, page 78)
Trang 5LETTERS TO THE EDITORS
Genes and Behavior
John HorganÕs article ỊEugenics
Re-visitedĨ [SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, June], as
its title suggests, would rather try to
embarrass behavioral geneticists and
impugn their motives as politically
sus-pect than enlighten the reader about a
long-standing controversy
The two boxes and the captions of
the Þve illustrations betray HorganÕs
in-tent: claims of genetic inßuence on
psy-chological characteristics are alleged to
be overblown or doubtful and to have
been recently retracted or deemed
un-publishable One half-page box reminds
the reader that Hitler was an
enthusias-tic eugenicist and thus, presumably,
had much in common with the modern
behavioral genetics researcher But as
those who are familiar with
contempo-rary behavioral genetics literature will
know, these baseless accusations are
merely an attempt to win with scare
tactics that which has not been won in
the research laboratory
Apart from direct assessments, the
status of an individualÕs identical twin
is the single best predictor of risk for
schizophrenia, manic-depressive illness,
alcoholism, IQ and personality
More-over, evidence from twin studies is
consistent with both adoption studies,
which show that adoptees resemble
psychologically their biological parents
more than their adoptive parents, and
family studies, which demonstrate that
the psychological similarity among
rel-atives is directly related to their degree
of genetic relatedness
Explanations for behavioral genetics
Þndings summarized in HorganÕs
arti-cle are either laughable (as when he
says the similarity in sexual orientation
between twins owes to having been
dressed alike as children), disingenuous
(as when twins reared apart are said to
owe their similarity to contact between
the twins even though both the
Min-nesota and the Karolinska groups have
tested and rejected that possibility), or
misleading (as when Horgan features
the only study of alcoholism in male
twins that failed to report signiÞcantly
greater concordance between identical
than nonidentical twinsĐeven though
that study involved a far smaller
sam-ple than any of the Þve other studies)
Ironically, a case for behavioral
ge-netics is made in the article on
ỊAu-tism,Ĩ by Uta Frith, in the same issue A
generation ago behavioral scientists cribed autism to, among other things,the inadequacies of Ịrefrigerator moth-ers.Ĩ As Frith points out, twin studieshave shown that Ịautism can have a ge-netic basis,Ĩ and biobehavioral models
as-of autism are now favored Horgan, andthe select group of critics he promotes,may long for the bygone days of radi-cal environmentalism, but thankfullythose days are past
MATT MCGUEDepartment of PsychologyUniversity of Minnesota
Co-signers include 16 scientists from eight institutions in the U.S., Australia, Sweden and the Netherlands; list avail- able from McGue.
Horgan replies:
IÕll respond to just three points made
by McGue et al First, nowhere did I pugn their motives as politically sus-pect But since they raise the issue, let
im-me note that the major sponsor of theMinnesota twin studies is the PioneerFund, a private foundation that has alsosupported William Shockley and otherproponents of racial theories of intelli-gence Second, the chief critics of theMinnesota twin studies are not ỊradicalenvironmentalistsĨ but other behavior-
al geneticists, who believe the methods
of the Minnesota group are biased ward high heritability Finally, a grow-ing number of investigators suspectthat viral infections or physical trau-mas occurring during pregnancy mightcause autismĐpossibilities that do notfall neatly into either the nature or nur-ture category
to-Cochlear Implants
I commend John Rennie on ỊWho IsNormal?Ĩ [ỊScience and the Citizen,Ĩ
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, August] As one
of a few audiologists who respect andactively elicit the view of the Americandeaf community, I am thrilled to see atlast such an unbiased article about thiscontroversial topic of cochlear implants
I would have to agree with RobertShannon, who stated so assuredly, ỊIdonÕt think that deaf people are wellintegrated into society at large.Ĩ Iwould have to add that this is true forAfrican-Americans, Hispanic-Americans,
female Americans, gay Americans, poorAmericans, handicapped Americans andother oppressed minorities ỊSociety atlargeĨ in this country means white, up-per middle class, Protestant, well edu-cated and male We, as a country, shape,coerce and even demand our inhabi-tants to conform to this mold or be clas-siÞed as a second-class citizen How un-fortunate How sad
We should no more be trying to makedeaf children hearing or Little Peopletaller than we should try to make Afri-can-Americans white or women intomen If we can stop making assump-tions long enough to listen to thosewho are deaf, listen to those who areLittle People, listen to those who areAfrican-American then we can hear
the truth.
HOLLY M GEESLINIndianapolis, Ind
CanÕt Get There from Here
In ỊAustraliaÕs Polar DinosaursĨ [SENTIFIC AMERICAN, July], Patricia Vick-ers-Rich and Thomas Hewitt Rich spec-ulate that the tendency toward dwarf-ism shown by populations on islandsmay be a response to selective pressure
CI-to increase the number of individuals
so as to ensure a diverse gene pool Yetselective pressure can reduce the aver-age size of a population only if a smallindividual achieves greater reproduc-tive Þtness than its larger cousins Theprospect of retaining a diverse genepool many generations into the futurecannot have the eÝect of increasing thefrequency of a gene for small size
ANDREW PAGELangport, England
Vickers-Rich and Rich reply:
You are correct Space considerationsforced us to abbreviate our presenta-tion of the mechnisms causing dwarf-ism in island populations Page 196 of
our book Wildlife of Gondwana ( Reed
Books, Sydney, 1993) has a more ough treatment of this topic
thor-8 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN November 1993
Because of the volume of mail, letters
to the editor cannot be acknowledged Letters selected for publication may be edited for length and clarity.
Copyright 1993 Scientific American, Inc.
Trang 650 AND 100 YEARS AGO
0NOVEMBER 1943
ỊAir-conditioning of submarines is
now possible through use of a
non-tox-ic, non-explosive ßuid, called ƠFreon-12,Õ
ßuorine refrigerant, which is
non-poi-sonous, has no odor, and will not
sup-port ßame It does not explode should
it come into contact with the electric
stoves of a subÕs galley, nor does it
in-terfere with the chemicals which purify
the air The men aboard the underseas
vessels so equipped can even smoke.Ĩ
ỊGlass with non-reßecting surfaces,
developed for military uses by
Ameri-can Optical and RCA, Ameri-can be applied,
with desirable results, to post-war
man-ufacture of many useful items Among
the new products are windshields sans
dangerous reßections, less conspicuous
spectacle lenses, more easily read
in-struments, faster camera lenses, shop
windows free from reßections, more
eÛcient microscopes and other
light-transmitting instruments.Ĩ
ỊNewspapers and magazines of
to-day frequently predict a post-war
fu-ture including a private airplane in
ev-ery garage General Aircraft
Corpora-tion has opened up a bit in regard to
its plans Here is a
prophet-ic quotation: ƠOur business
man leaves his home in the
morning in his Ơcar,Õ drives
to the airport While having
his ƠcarÕ Þlled with gas, the
attendants put on the wings,
a Þve-minute job After
ßy-ing to his destination, he has
the wings removed, drives
his ƠcarÕ downtown, makes
his necessary calls, drives
back to the airport, and,
don-ning his wings, goes on to
his next destination by air.Õ Ĩ
ỊRayon and other Þbers
are cutting deeply into
cot-tonÕs tire-cord monopoly and
are threatening other
strong-holds Science, however, is
starting to alter the situation
Designs for cotton goods are
being developed in many
forms; chemical treatments
are being worked out to
change the feel, the
appear-ance, and the quality of
cot-ton fabrics; cotcot-ton is being
made water-proof, rot-proof, Þre-proof,and spot-proof; agricultural experts aredeveloping plants which will producebetter grades of the Þber in largerquantities.Ĩ
NOVEMBER 1893ỊIf ordinary placental mammals haveevolved from pouched animals like themodern marsupials, rudiments of thepouch ought certainly to be recogniz-able in some of them Dr H Klaatschhas just made the interesting announce-ment that such rudiments can actually
be observed in most placentals thing of the kind has already beenfound in the lemurs, and one author hassupposed that rudiments of the pouchcan also be detected in the sheep.Ĩ
Some-Ị ƠOnce I placed an aerial motor on apair of Fairbanks scales and set it going,Õsays Thomas A Edison ƠIt lightened thescales, but it didnÕt ßy Another time Irigged up an umbrella-like disk of shut-ters and connected it with a rapid pis-ton in a perpendicular cylinder These
shutters would open and shut If I couldhave got suÛcient speed, say a mile asecond, the inertia or resistance of theair would have been as great as steel,and the quick operation of these shut-ters would have driven the machine, but
I couldnÕt get the speed I believe thatbefore the air ship men succeed theywill have to do away with the buoyancychamber.Õ Ĩ
ỊThe American Telephone and graph Company recently gave an exhi-bition of their long-distance telephonelines to a small party of guests who as-sembled at the Telephone building inCortlandt Street Among those assem-bled were Dr Von Helmholtz and Prof.Alexander Graham Bell A number ofreceivers were arranged so as to giveeach of the party a connection to theline Connection was made with Bos-ton, Chicago, and Washington in turn,and conversations were held with theoÛcers at those points A cornet wasalso played which was heard through
Tele-500 miles of wire as distinctly as though
it were in an adjoining room.ĨỊIt is indispensable for the sake ofeconomy, and especially for safety, toshut oÝ the gas at the meter for the
night in every house Themovable night lamp, whichoperates at an expense ofbut one cent a night, pre-sents the advantage of ac-companying those who go
up or down stairs after thegas has been put out It suf-Þces to grasp at the bottom
of the staircase a light terpoise Þxed to the lamp by
coun-a cord, coun-and the lcoun-amp thenascends with the person andaÝords him light progres-sively When the story atwhich one is to stop isreached, the lamp, upon theweight being released, de-scends of itself to the bot-tom of the stairway In order
to descend with a light, itsuÛces to raise the lampthrough the chain that sup-ports it (an operation thatrequires three seconds) and
to grasp the counterpoise.The lamp then follows theperson to the bottom of thestaircase.Ĩ
Movable lamp for stairway
Trang 7Grim Statistics
GunÞre may surpass auto
accidents as a cause of death
The European tourists who
were shot by highway
Òhun-tersÓ in Florida were
driv-ing cars that were legally required
to have seat belts and may even
have been equipped with airbags
Whereas nationwide concern
with automobile safety has led to
improved crash-worthiness and
tougher laws for drunken driving,
the number of deaths caused by
gunfire continues to increase Will
the declining curve of
auto-relat-ed mortality intersect with the rising
curve of deaths from firearm use?
The most authoritative statistics
in-dicate that the question is not Òwill?Ó
but Òwhen?Ó According to Garen mute of the University of California atDavis, guns may move into first placeduring the next decade
Winte-WintemuteÕs comparison of gunand automobile mortality statis-
tics (left) was published in the
Journal of the American Medical Association The date on which the
nation achieves the crossoverÑsome reports reveal that Louisi-ana and Texas have already donesoÑdepends on the stability ofcurrent trends Deaths from gun-shot wounds have increased rap-idly during the past Þve years (af-ter a decade of decline), whereasautomobile fatalities are fallingfaster than usual, as they tend to
do in bad economic times If thisnew pattern persists, more peo-ple will die from gunfire than inauto accidents during 1994 But
if long-term historical trends reassertthemselves, the crossover will wait un-til a few years after the turn of the
SCIENCE AND THE CITIZEN
14 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN November 1993
DotÕs Incredible
Controlling single electrons
in a quantum dot
Manipulating small numbers of
atomic particles seems to have
become a standard part of the
repertoire of physics So devotees of the
art are being dazzled by a supreme feat
of nanoscale sleight of hand, which has
been achieved by researchers at AT&T
Bell Laboratories
The Bell Labs workers, Raymond C
Ashoori, now at the Massachusetts
In-stitute of Technology, and
Horst L Stormer and their
col-leagues, report in Physical
Re-view Letters that they can
con-trol the behavior of as few
as one or two electrons in a
patch of semiconducting
ma-terial that is only a few tens
of nanometers square This
lev-el of resolution was
previous-ly thought to be unattainable
The success should enable
in-vestigators to explore
quan-tum phenomena that have
nev-er been obsnev-erved in an expnev-eri-
experi-mental setting and might serve
as a basis for signiÞcant
tech-nological advances
The semiconductor specks
are known as quantum dots,
or artiÞcial atoms Although many realatoms actually constitute a quantumdot, the electronic properties of a dotmake it the equivalent of an individualatom Like a real atom, a quantum dotharbors distinct numbers of electrons
But rather than being held in place bythe charge of a nucleus, the electrons
in an artiÞcial atom are conÞned byboundaries of a material Trapped insuch a box, the electrons occupy dis-crete energy levels, just as they dowhen bound by a real nucleus A quan-tum dot is constructed from a Þlm ofsemiconducting material, such as galli-
um arsenide, sandwiched between two
insulating layers The lithographic cesses used to etch circuit patterns canform the artiÞcial atoms [see ÒDimin-ishing Dimensions,Ó by Elizabeth Cor-coran; SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, November1990; and ÒQuantum Dots,Ó by Mark A.Reed, January]
pro-Detailed studies of the properties ofquantum dots have been diÛcult Thestandard method of examining theirelectronic characteristicsÑmeasuringthe charge ßowing through themÑwaslimited in resolution ÒThe current issmall, and you have to put 30 to 40 elec-trons into the artiÞcial atom before cur-rent ßows,Ó according to Marc A Kast-
ner, an M.I.T investigator whoalso explores artiÞcial atoms.But Ashoori had a dream oflooking at electrons one byone as they accumulate toform an artiÞcial atom Whileworking at Bell Labs, he andhis colleagues decided to trymeasuring changes in theamount of charge (that is, thecapacitance) caused by the dotrather than the amount of cur-rent ßowing though it Thetechnique, single-electron ca-pacitance spectroscopy, callsfor placing an artiÞcial atombetween two electrically con-ducting plates ÒWe then apply
a ÔticklingÕ voltage to induce anelectron from one of the plates
LONG-TERM MORTALITY TRENDS for motor cles and firearms (colors) converge in 2003, short- term ones (black ) in 1994.
vehi-QUANTUM DOTS are fabricated inside metal disks about one micron in diameter A contact loop collars the middle disk and transmits the signals from the tunneling elec- trons inside to measurement devices.
302520151050
Copyright 1993 Scientific American, Inc.
Trang 8to tunnel,Ó Ashoori explains The laws
of quantum physics give the electron,
which does not have enough energy to
move from the plate to the
semiconduc-tor, a temporary boost The particle can
then tunnel through the energy barrier
to make the trip When it does so, it
be-comes bound to the artiÞcial atom The
electron does not bond to a real atom,
because according to the quantum
me-chanics of solids it is a free electron
Free electrons do not feel the presence
of real atoms in the material
Ashoori knows when an electron has
tunneled to the artiÞcial atom, because
the particleÕs movement induces a nuscule but detectable charge to form
mi-in the other plate By changmi-ing the age across the plates, the investigatorscan make electrons tunnel one by one
volt-to the artiÞcial avolt-tom Only the perature of the sample, which must
tem-be kept near absolute zero, limits theresolution
The physicists grant that the tance technique may have some practi-cal use It might, for instance, act as afoundation for a photodetector thatcounts single electrons The device would
capaci-be superior in performance to existing
detectors by a factor of 10 The dotsthemselves might also be employed asthe ultimate tiny circuit element Ash-oori and Stormer point out, however,that the true strength of the work lies
in basic research ÒIt is a toy box, an credibly powerful microscope,Ó Ash-oori says
in-But why look at artiÞcial atoms whenthere are plenty of natural ones lyingaround? The answer is that an artiÞcialatom diÝers in promising ways fromthe real McCoy Quantum dots are sever-
al hundred times larger (a hydrogenatom is about 0.1 nanometer in diame-ter), and the ÒwallsÓ that trap electrons
in a dot are not as symmetric as thenuclear charge that holds electrons.Such diÝerences, the researchers say,open a new realm of physics
For example, tests of quantum fects that require temperatures, Þeldstrengths and other conditions well be-yond those achievable with todayÕsequipment become possible in artiÞcialatoms One is the inßuence a magneticÞeld exerts on conÞned electrons Ac-cording to the Pauli exclusion principle,
ef-no two electrons can occupy preciselythe same state The two electrons in ahelium atom, lying in their lowest ener-
gy state, distinguish themselves by enting their ÒspinsÓ in opposite direc-tions An external magnetic Þeld, how-ever, tends to force the spins to align,which would put the two electrons inthe same quantum state So, theory pre-dicts, one electron must jump to a high-
ori-er enori-ergy level
To conduct the experiment on real oms, workers would have to use a mag-net that would generate an external Þeld
at-of about 400,000 teslas Even the sundoes not produce such a mighty Þeld.The superconducting magnets used inmagnetic resonance imaging typicallycreate Þelds of about 0.5 to 1.5 teslas
In an artiÞcial atom, Ashoori notes, aÞeld of less than two teslas suÛces tomake an electron jump to a new energylevel Using quantum dots, physicistsmay also be able to probe much morerigorously such unusual phenomena asquantum chaos and the quantum HalleÝect
Customizing quantum dots is also apossibility ÒThe nice thing is,Ó Stormercomments, Òyou can make any kind ofartiÞcial atomÑlong, thin atoms and big,round atoms.Ó Then, one can string to-gether many of these quantum dots, cre-ating an artiÞcial molecule The artiÞcialmolecules can in turn be joined to makeartiÞcial solidsÑan intriguing prospect
to many physicists ÒWhat is drivingthe excitement,Ó Kastner explains, Òisthe hope that there is something there
we didnÕt expect.Ó ÑPhilip Yam
Were Four Corners Victims Biowar Casualties?
ould a mysterious disease that has taken at least 16 lives in the Four
Corners region of the Southwest since this past May be related to the
U.S biological warfare program? In June, federal and state investigators
blamed the outbreak on hantaviruses Although hantavirus-related illnesses
were unknown in the U.S before this year, they have been studied by
mili-tary and civilian researchers since the 1950s, when U.S troops fighting in
Korea became infected with a flulike disease that attacks the kidneys
The virus, named after Korea’s Hantaan River, is carried by rodents and is
transmitted by airborne particles of the feces or urine of infected animals
The Four Corners illnesses were almost certainly caused in this way, asserts
C Mack Sewell, an epidemiologist for the state of New Mexico, who notes
that the virus had previously been detected in deer mice in the area
Rumors have nonetheless persisted among Native Americans and others
in the Four Corners region that Fort Wingate, an army base near the
epicen-ter of the epidemic, was somehow involved In June, Senator Jeff Bingaman
of New Mexico queried the Pentagon about possible biological warfare
ac-tivities at the base The Pentagon acknowledged that the fort was once used
as a storage depot for chemical weapons but denied that biological weapons
were ever held or tested there
Yet Fort Wingate has served as a target site, or “impact zone,” for missiles
launched from other military bases, according to a former congressional
in-vestigator who requested anonymity One possible launch site is the
Dug-way Proving Grounds in Utah, several hundred miles to the north The army
has conducted experiments at Dugway with both chemical and biological
agents for decades Dugway earned notoriety in 1968 when a jet aircraft
from the site accidentally released nerve gas over a nearby ranch and killed
thousands of sheep
The investigator suggests that tests initiated at Dugway may have
infect-ed the Fort Wingate region with biological agents years ago The epidemic
may then have been triggered by demolition or other disturbances related to
the decommissioning of Fort Wingate early this year
There is also reason to doubt that all the Four Corners illnesses stemmed
from hantavirus, the investigator notes Fewer than half of the victims tested
positive for hantavirus Moreover, deaths were attributed not to kidney
fail-ure—the usual outcome of hantavirus infection—but from hemorrhaging of
the lungs Congress recently appropriated $6 million for a study of the Four
Corners outbreak
Whatever the conclusions of the study, the suspicion engendered by the
incident shows the need for greater openness within—and perhaps
demili-tarization of—the biological defense program, argues Leonard A Cole of
Rutgers University, an authority on the history of biological warfare “It
would be in the army’s interest to eliminate the conspiratorial attitude
to-ward these outbreaks,” he points out This year, Congress required the
De-partment of Health and Human Services to examine the feasibility of
shift-ing some biological defense research from the army to the National
C
Trang 9Insects Are Forever
Staying power, not flower
power, made bugs diverse
Anyone who has ever shared an
apartment with cockroaches has
suspected as much, but now it’s
o¤cial : insects almost never go away
After surveying the fossil literature, two
researchers have concluded that at the
family level, insects have shrugged o›
catastrophes that exterminated fragile,
dainty creatures—such as the dinosaurs
“Because of the low rate of extinction,
you have insect lineages that are very
long lived, approaching 100 million
years in some cases,” notes Conrad C
Labandeira, one of the new study’s
au-thors and a paleoentomologist at the
National Museum of Natural History of
the Smithsonian Institution That
fami-ly durability seems to explain why bugs
are so numerous and varied today
By almost any standard, insects are
phenomenally successful They were
the first animals to invade the land
and, later, the air They are the most
di-verse group, too: by some estimates,
about 876,000 insect species have been
identified, and entomologists believe a
full tally would be in the millions ( By
comparison, taxonomists know of only
about 4,000 mammal species.)
Accord-ing to Douglas Futuyma, an expert on
insect evolution at the State University
of New York at Stony Brook, insects’
success has often been attributed to
a presumably exceptional talent for becoming new species Agricultural sci-entists know, for example, that insects can readily evolve new traits, such as resistance to pesticides Some experi-ments also suggested that specific groups
of insects, such as the fruit flies in theHawaiian Islands, also diverged intoseparate species very quickly
But the report recently appearing in
Science indicates that adaptability may
have been less important for insectsthan sheer, stubborn endurance Sincethe mid-1980s, Labandeira and J JohnSepkoski, Jr., of the University of Chica-
go have been searching the fossil recordfor evolutionary patterns in insect diver-sity and survival They note that manyscientists have assumed that insects donot fossilize well “There’s been this received wisdom that because insectsaren’t durably calcified like mollusks orthe bones of vertebrates, there wouldn’t
be much of a fossil record,” Labandeiraremarks In fact, the literature from oldGerman, Russian and Chinese sourceswas rich enough for Labandeira andSepkoski to gather information about1,263 extinct and extant insect fami-lies Only about 825 families of four-legged animals (vertebrate tetrapods)have been documented as fossils
Those data demonstrated that
fami-lies of insects rarely disappeared, evenwhen other animal groups were perish-ing en masse The researchers found, forexample, that 84 percent of the insectfamilies living 100 million years ago,during the Cretaceous period, are alsopresent today In contrast, only 20 per-cent of the Cretaceous tetrapod familiesare still around The mass extinctions
at the end of the Cretaceous destroyedabout one quarter of the tetrapod fami-lies (including all the dinosaurs), but theeffect on insects was negligible Indeed,the only extinction event that had amajor impact on insect diversity wasthe huge one at the end of the Permianperiod, 250 million years ago It wipedout 65 percent of the insect familiesthen living, probably because nearly allvegetation died at the same time.Labandeira and Sepkoski’s findings
do not contradict the possibility of
rap-id speciation in insects Labandeira saysthat, if anything, long-term survivorship
of families and rapid turnover of speciesmay go hand in hand Because great-
er species diversity promotes the vival of a family and surviving groupshave more opportunities to diversify,the trend is self-perpetuating : nothingsucceeds like success
sur-To the surprise of some biologists, bandeira and Sepkoski also observedthat the appearance of flowering plants,
La-or angiosperms, 125 million years agodid not cause a burst of insect diversi-
ty “As a matter of fact, the rate of versification abated,” Labandeira em-phasizes That finding was unexpectedbecause insects and flowering plantsoften live in intimate, species-specificassociations
di-One explanation, the researchers
pos-it, is that the evolutionary effects of theangiosperms might have been invisible
to their study : the diversity they moted might have been at the speciesrather than the family level And Futuy-
pro-ma notes that the order Lepidoptera(butterflies and moths) is underrepre-sented in the fossil record Because lep-idopteran insects have some of the clos-est associations with flowering plants,
he thinks their absence might disguisesome diversification
Yet Labandeira and Sepkoski also fer the theory that for insects, the angio-sperms were not very novel challenges.They discovered that most types ofmouthparts found in modern insectswere present 100 million years beforeangiosperms evolved Insects that werealready dining on gymnosperms, coni-fers and other seed plants did not needradical adaptations to take advantage
of-of the new flora “We live in an sperm-dominated world,” Labandeirareflects “It’s hard for us to picture how
angio-18 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN November 1993
FOSSILS OF INSECTS suggest that their taxonomic families are highly resistant to
extinction, which may explain why insects are so diverse today This snake fly fossil
from a limestone deposit in Brazil is 120 million years old.
Trang 10Goldilocks Cosmology
Theorists toss another
ingredient into the cosmic recipe
At times, the story of modern
cos-mology sounds oddly like the
tale of Goldilocks and the three
bears Some theorists have proposed
that the mass of the universe is
domi-nated by fast-moving invisible particles
known as hot dark matter; others
fa-vor a universe dominated by sluggish
cold dark matter In either case, the
un-seen material helps to explain how large
structures (such as galaxies and clusters
of galaxies) emerged from the hot, panding mass that existed after the bigbang But neither kind of dark matterseems entirely able to account for theobserved organization of the cosmos
ex-A number of researchers are thereforeexploring a third scenario in which theuniverse contains a nearly even blend
of hot and cold dark matter And ingood Goldilocks fashion, they arguethat such a mix may work “just right.”
Cosmologists have tended to shyaway from mixed dark matter models,
in part because “the subject is oftenguided by aesthetic simplicity Most peo-ple thought mixed dark matter was veryugly,” reflects Nick Kaiser of the Insti-tute for Theoretical Astrophysics at theUniversity of Toronto Kaiser and his co-workers Robert A Malaney and Glenn
D Starkman think they have addressedsuch reservations by finding an attrac-tive way to create two kinds of darkmatter through a single mechanism
In a recent paper in Physical
Re-view Letters, the researchers envision a
universe that initially contained a ulation of massive neutrinos, neutralparticles that barely interact with nor-mal matter Physicists commonly as-sume that neutrinos have no mass, butmounting evidence suggests otherwise
pop-Kaiser and his collaborators proposethat the massive neutrinos could havedecayed in such a way as to stimu-late the formation of slow-moving (andhence “cold” in cosmological parlance)
dark matter particles The workers callthis mechanism “neutrino lasing,” byanalogy to the stimulated creation ofphotons of light in a conventionallaser The heavy neutrinos themselvesdecay into lighter, high-speed particles(possibly another form of neutrino) thatconstitute a component of hot darkmatter In this way, a single, fairly ele-gant set of events can account for theexistence of two separate components
of dark matter
Neutrino lasing occurs at such highenergies that “it could be very very dif-ficult indeed” to devise a laboratory test
to prove the existence of the enon, Kaiser admits “ What we are pre-senting here is a new piece of physics,”
phenom-he explains; now it is up to tphenom-he particlephysicists to find a place for it in thebroader context of their theories.Even if the idea does not pan out, neu-trino lasing is far from the only way tocreate mixed dark matter “There arelots of more mundane ways to do it,”says Robert K Schaefer of the BartolResearch Institute at the University ofDelaware Indeed, from a particle phys-ics point of view, “ it’s sort of natural”
to have both hot and cold dark matter,
he says Schaefer sees great promise intwo-component dark matter cosmologi-cal models New observations have com-peting models “scrambling after datapoints,” he claims, whereas the latestfindings are “settling more and moretoward mixed dark matter.”
Some cosmologists still object to thenotion of mixed dark matter on aesthet-
ic grounds “I’ve seen people get up ter talks and say, ‘This is the ugliestmodel I’ve ever seen’—there’s no scien-tific rationalization,” Schaefer reports.Jeremiah P Ostriker of Princeton Uni-versity agrees that the lack of simplicity
af-is a poor argument against mixed darkmatter models “Who’s to say that na-ture will be simple? Biological systemsare a mess,” he laughs
Ostriker objects to the simplest mixeddark matter models for a very di›er-ent reason: in his opinion, “they don’twork.” Astronomical observations re-veal that galaxies and quasars existedwithin a couple of billion years after thebig bang and large clusters of galaxiesnot long thereafter Mixed dark mattercosmologies cannot readily explain howsuch objects could have formed so soonafter the big bang
Kaiser readily concedes that di¤cultybut thinks the various bits of evidenceindicating at what era large galaxy clus-ters began to form remain equivocal
“ You pay your money, and you takeyour choice,” as he puts it Ostriker, incontrast, feels the inability of mixeddark matter to account for the appear-
well insects thrived in a world with
dif-ferent vegetation.”
He and Sepkoski end their paper with
a warning that humanity’s extensive
de-forestation e›orts might trigger a
calam-itous loss of insect diversity That
state-ment might seem paradoxical, given
in-sects’ historical resilience Labandeira
acknowledges that it was more of a
cau-tionary speculation than an analysis and
that “anything that’s happening today
may be mild compared with what
hap-pened during the late Permian.” Still,
some insect groups are highly
impor-tant to ecosystems, and deforestation
can eliminate them ruthlessly If hardy
insect clans are su›ering, other fauna
and flora may be even more
debilitat-ed Think about that the next time you
reach for a flyswatter —John Rennie
CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES, such as this one in the constellation Hercules, may have
assembled under the gravitational coercion of vast clumps of unseen dark matter.
But the simplest dark matter models do not match the observed cosmic structure.
Trang 11Sausage Factory
How Congress passes
the pork to Back-Home U.
Back in 16th-century England, when
livestock grazed on a common,
farmers would identify their swine
by special marks on the animals’ ears
In 20th-century America, earmarks of a
di›erent kind are increasingly being
used to distribute federal pork to
col-leges and universities
An investigation conducted by
Con-gressman George E Brown, Jr., of
Cali-fornia, chairman of the House
Commit-tee on Science, Space and Technology,
shows that during the 1980s the
prac-tice of cajoling Congress into
support-ing academic projects that had not
been requested by the executive branch,
subjected to competitive review or
scru-tinized by any congressional
authoriz-ing committee grew to majestic
propor-tions—at least by university standards
A select but expanding group of leges now routinely taps federal funds
col-by lobcol-bying influential members of gress to insert special provisions, ear-marked to fund specific projects, intothe appropriations bills and reports forfederal agencies More than $700 mil-lion so earmarked was appropriated in
Con-1992 In 1980 the total was $11 lion Brown points out that individualearmarked appropriations ranged invalue from a few hundred thousanddollars to more than $40 million thispast year
mil-In general, authorizing committees inCongress approve the overall direction
of agencies’ spending, and then priations committees vote the funds to
appro-be used But by sliding in an earmarkedprovision at a late stage in the appropri-ation process—often in the conferencecommittee, which reconciles House andSenate versions of a bill—a member cansecure funds for a project that mightnot survive a measured consideration
Brown complains that the practice
“destroys rational e›orts to set ties tied to national needs” and “fails
priori-to protect the taxpayers’ investment.”
Many unreviewed allocations, he notes,were forced onto unwilling federal agen-cies that consequently had little choicebut to spend the money or risk a con-frontation In this way, the Department
of Energy was pushed into buildinghospitals, for example, and the FederalAviation Administration was directed tospend $30 million this past year on an
“airway science” program that it wouldlike to terminate
Although less than 5 percent of
high-er education institutions receive marked funds, Brown’s “just say no”
ear-campaign faces an uphill battle Thenumber of universities retaining lob-byists in Washington—at fees of up to
$60,000 a month, according to Brown’ssta›—is escalating Brown found that
21 out of 50 academic institutions thatreceived allocated funds in fiscal 1993had employed registered lobbyists theprevious year Moreover, the sameschools keep showing up time and again
in the chow line Thus, eight of the top
10 recipients in 1992 were among thetop 20 between 1980 and 1992 IowaState University, the University of Alas-
ka, Oregon Health Sciences Universityand Louisiana State University head thelist of all-time winners
Martin C Jischke, president of IowaState, says the earmarked projects at hisuniversity, which include a center for ad-vanced technology development and anexperimental food irradiation facility, are
“important and defensible.” Moreover, heasserts, “there was no competitive fed-
eral program to which we could apply.”Other recipients of unreviewed tar-geted funds responded to Brown’s sur-vey by saying they as lesser lights in thescholastic firmament would be unable tocompete with better-established schools.But that plea does not stand up in mostcases Many of the institutions that re-ceive the largest of such allocations fall
in the top 25 percent of recipients ofpeer-reviewed research grants from theNational Science Foundation, according
to Brown’s sta›
Recipients insist on their right to
lob-by Congress and point out that cause some funds are “leveraged”—that
be-is, the institution itself provides funds
to match the federal dollars—they sent cost-e¤cient federal spending Butmany such funds are not leveraged Andthe contention that they send federal dol-lars to poor states is contradicted byanother of Brown’s findings What manyrecipients have in common, Brown’sstudy shows, is a senator or congress-man in an influential position on an ap-propriations subcommittee
repre-Some political tides may be flowing inBrown’s favor Congressman William H.Natcher of Kentucky, the new chairman
of the House Appropriations tee, has set his cap firmly against ear-marking funds for academic groups.And as budgets get tighter, members
Commit-of authorizing committees in the Houseare becoming increasingly sensitive tothe threat that such appropriationspose, observes Peter Smith of the Asso-ciation of American Universities.But universities themselves seem tofind it hard to speak with one voice
on the subject In 1987 members of the association, which represents ma-jor research institutions, voted 43 to
10 to observe a moratorium on ing earmarked funds Since then, sev-eral members who voted in favor of the moratorium have “slipped” andnow accept earmarked money, Smithsays —Tim Beardsley
seek-SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN November 1993 23
ance of the early universe means “it is
probably not correct.”
Mixed dark matter represents only
one of a number of theoretical tweaks
that cosmologists are using to
fine-tune their models to fit the
observa-tions Some workers posit that cosmic
strings—hypothetical, extremely dense
defects in the structure of space left
over from the first moments of
crea-tion—could have acted as seeds around
which galaxies formed Other theories
invoke alternative but equally
hypo-thetical mechanisms for creating dense
structures very early in the history of
the universe
Each time new data come in, Ostriker
notes, the easiest thing to do is “just add
another epicycle” to existing
cosmolog-ical theory Mixed dark matter adds one
layer of complexity to the previous
mod-els, most of which incorporated cold
dark matter alone “But nature could be
nasty ; there could be cold dark matter,
hot dark matter plus strings,” Ostriker
muses Or the universe could be far
simpler than most astronomers
imag-ine Despite many claims to the
con-trary, Ostriker maintains that there is
still no solid evidence for exotic dark
matter If such dark matter does not
ex-ist, then one could build a model “based
on hydrogen, tables and chairs—stu›
we know about,” he comments
The joy of speculating about the early
history of the universe—as well as the
frustration—is that the possibilities are
nearly endless Goldilocks had but three
bowls of porridge to sample Only the
human imagination limits the menu of
cosmology —Corey S Powell
“ Pollution, Pollution ”
Federal air standards permit dangerous particulate levels
It’s enough to make Tom Lehrer sit
down at the piano again Findingsfrom a recent study indicate thatloopholes in government standards havelet one of the most harmful forms ofair pollution become a dangerous fact
of everyday urban life
The study, presented at the annualmeeting of the American Lung Associa-tion by C Arden Pope, a visiting scientist
COPYRIGHT 1993 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC
Trang 12at the Harvard School of Public Health,measured the e›ects of air pollution onresidents in six U.S cities Pope found a
26 percent higher risk of prematuredeath in the city most polluted with am-bient particles as compared with theleast polluted city surveyed The work-ers also noted “robust associations” be-tween chronic exposure to airborne par-ticulate matter and increased mortality
As disturbing as the results is the factthat the air in all six cities carried parti-cles whose density per volume of atmo-sphere was well below legal thresholds.The current Environmental ProtectionAgency regulations mandate that densi-
ty of particles less than 10 microns indiameter shall not exceed 150 micro-grams per cubic meter of air during a24-hour period The Harvard data corre-late morbidity and mortality statisticswith the presence of particles one quar-ter the size specified in the EPA regula-tions The density of such particles didnot on average exceed one third thatspecified by the EPA benchmark.The Harvard team culled its statisticsfrom an analysis of 8,111 residents inthe six cities, whom it followed for 14
to 16 years Pope, who came fromBrigham Young University to partici-pate in the Six Cities Study, says theconclusions point toward fine particlesand particles from the combustion offossil fuels as the most pernicious airpollutants
Such pollutants include carbon, drocarbons, dust, acid aerosols and sul-fates Common respiratory problemsthat can develop from exposure to thesepollutants are chronic obstructive pul-monary disease, cardiovascular diseaseand asthma
hy-“If you ask the average layperson,these results would probably come as
no surprise, but it has taken a while for science to catch up with commonsense,” says Alfred Munzer, president ofthe American Lung Association ( ALA )
“This is the first time that we havehard data to show not just the morbid-ity caused by particle pollution but theincrease in mortality as well.”
A 1992 report by Joel Schwartz, anepidemiologist at the EPA, and Douglas
W Dockery of Harvard, who also uted to the Six Cities Study, estimatedthat respirable particles may cause some60,000 premature deaths in the U.S.every year Previous accounts compiled
contrib-by Pope, Schwartz and Dockery havelinked death rates and particulate pollu-tion levels around the country fordecades Critics argued that these stud-ies did not adequately control for indi-vidual risk factors, such as tobaccosmoking, and so did not warrant reme-dial legislation or regulatory action
Trang 13But the Six Cities Study directly dressed such factors The findings haveforced doubters out of that defensiveditch Indeed, the statistics have prompt-
ad-ed the ALA to announce that it intends
to file suit against the EPA to demand atimely review of policy regarding parti-cle pollution “It is imperative that werevise our standards, particularly when
it comes to particles,” Munzer says
The EPA has not reviewed its dards for particulate matter since 1987,even though the Clean Air Act of 1970requires it to do so every five years
stan-Schwartz, who was one of the first demiologists to document the dangers
epi-of particles, is frustrated with the lay He notes that EPA o¤cials have tar-geted 1999 as the earliest possible datefor a policy change regarding particulatematter “I think the di›erence betweenreviewing particle standards at Thanks-giving 1999 and Christmas 1999 is moreimportant than all the other regulationsthe EPA plans to put out between nowand then,” he emphasizes
de-EPA o¤cials say they are moving asfast as they can “We have planned toset up an expedited schedule to reviewparticle standards,” says Robert D Bren-
ner, chief of policy for the EPA’s O¤ce
of Air Pollution “Now we know thatthere is a serious particulate problem,but that doesn’t necessarily tell youhow to set the standards,” he cautions.Schwartz points out that to speed thereview process, funds and workerswould have to be reallocated from oth-
er projects
One problem for scientists, both inacademia and at the EPA, is that theseparticles, no more than 10 microns indiameter (less than half the width of
an average human hair), are
extreme-ly difficult to examine They come from
a variety of sources: construction work,cars driving over dirt and paved roads,wind erosion, tobacco smoke, fireplac-
es and even backyard barbecues over, chemical reactions catalyzed bysunlight create harmful particle concoc-tions that are di¤cult to isolate fromother forms of air pollution
More-Or so argue the investigators Theskeptics want more proof Some criticscontend that a biological explanation ofhow particles cause disease or deathmust be demonstrated before the policycan be changed One unanswered ques-tion is whether the particles themselves
26 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN November 1993
PARTICLE MONITOR , which neighbors a midtown Manhattan bus stop, was moved back from the curb in 1990 to meet site criteria of the Environmental Protection Agency In its previous position, the equipment consistently collected fine particle levels from diesel exhaust far exceeding federal standards.
COPYRIGHT 1993 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC
Trang 14Unraveling AlzheimerÕs
A major cause of the disease yields to researchers
Workers at the Duke University
Medical Center have identiÞedwhat seems to be a critical fac-tor in the development of AlzheimerÕsdisease, the degenerative brain disorderthat aÜicts four million people in theU.S The factor may be associated withabout 80 percent of the cases of the ill-ness IdentiÞcation of the factor, a form
of a gene responsible for the ture of a lipoprotein, has been con-Þrmed by 10 other laboratories.The Duke researchersÑMargaret A.Pericak-Vance, Ann M Saunders andAllen D Roses, among othersÑhavefound a strikingly clear association be-tween the onset of AlzheimerÕs and aparticular variant of a gene that codesfor a known blood protein, apolipopro-
manufac-tein E The suspect gene, APOE-ε4, can
be detected with a test that is alreadywidely used for diagnosing a seriouscholesterol-transport disorder
Investigators had previously ered in a few cases of the relatively rareearly-onset form of AlzheimerÕs a muta-tion in the gene responsible for the pro-duction of amyloid beta-protein, which
discov-is deposited in the brains of patients.Some other cases appeared to be linked
to a diÝerent unknown gene But theseÞndings had not seemed relevant tothe majority of patients
The Þrst clue that a variant of the lipoprotein E gene might be involvedfell to a group in RosesÕs laboratory led
apo-by Warren J Strittmatter They foundlast year that apolipoprotein E binds tothe beta-amyloid deposited in the brain
of patients suÝering from AlzheimerÕs.The gene for apolipoprotein E is onchromosome 19 Pericak-Vance had justidentiÞed some cases of AlzheimerÕs infamilies in which the disease was inher-ited along with the section of chromo-
cause damage or whether blame belongs
to the chemicals they carry deep intothe lungs
Many researchers feel policy sions cannot be left up in the air un-til the biological grounds for damageassociated with particles are pinneddown Munzer hopes the threat of anALA lawsuit will put pressure on the EPA
deci-to make a change soon ÒThese thingsusually work, but it shouldnÕt be nec-essary,Ó he laments ÒThe process forincluding scientiÞc progress in publicpolicy needs to be a much more rap-
id one.Ó ÑKristin Leutwyler
Trang 15some 19 that includes the
apolipopro-tein E gene
RosesÕs group immediately started
studying apolipoprotein E The payoÝ
was not long in coming Saunders
dis-covered that patients in families
aÜict-ed with AlzheimerÕs are more likely
than are other people to have the
par-ticular form of the apolipoprotein E
gene known as APOE-ε4
In August, Saunders published a
conÞrming report in Neurology that
the association holds in so-called
spo-radic cases, in which there are no other
affected family members Other
work-ers have found evidence of the
asso-ciation in autopsied patients, in living
patients and in pilot epidemiological
surveys ÒUntil this, there hadnÕt been
a lot of progress since Alois
Alzheim-er found plaques and tangles in the
brains of his patients in 1907,Ó Roses
comments
ÒThis is a major Þnding ItÕs not only
right, itÕs important, too,Ó remarks John
A Hardy of the University of South
Florida ÒAll the papers suggest that
having one APOE-ε4 gene increases
your risk of AlzheimerÕs threefold to
fourfold and that people with two
APOE-ε4 genes are very likely to
devel-op AlzheimerÕs.Ó About 15 percent of
the U.S population has one APOE-ε4
gene and are thus at elevated risk
Be-tween 1 and 1.5 percent of the elderly
has two such genes, and Roses has
found that they tend to acquire
Alz-heimerÕs earlier than do people with
one APOE-ε4 gene
Although nobody is sure exactly why
APOE-ε4 makes the development of
AlzheimerÕs more likely, Roses says he
has deÞnite ideas, whose therapeutic
potential he plans to pursue Dennis J
Selkoe, an AlzheimerÕs researcher at
Harvard University and founding
scien-tist of Athena Neurosciences, a South
San Francisco biotechnology company,
suggests an explanation He speculates
that the protein made by APOE-ε4
inter-feres with the removal of amyloid
beta-protein from the brain Or possibly,
Selkoe says, the apolipoprotein
encour-ages deposition of the material
A drug that inhibited the interaction
of the two proteins might slow down
or eliminate whatever goes wrong in
AlzheimerÕs, according to Ivan
Lieber-burg of Athena LieberLieber-burg has
dis-cussed a collaboration on a therapeutic
approach with RosesÕs group The need
for therapies is urgent The only
exist-ing drug for AlzheimerÕs,
Warner-Lam-bertÕs Cognex, which the Food and Drug
Administration approved in September,
beneÞts just a small proportion of
pa-tients, points out Mark J Alberts, a Duke
researcher Cognex inhibits an enzyme
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN November 1993 29
Copyright 1993 Scientific American, Inc.
Trang 16that, in turn, destroys acetylcholine, an
important neurotransmitter that is in
short supply in the brains of
Alzheim-erÕs patients But Cognex, whose
chem-ical name is tacrine hydrochloride,
does not slow the cell death that
caus-es the shortage Other approachcaus-es to
therapy now under investigation share
this limitation
Until the hope for a satisfactory
ther-apy is realized, the Þndings raise an
ethical problem that has previously
emerged only in the context of rarer
conditions, such as HuntingtonÕs
dis-ease To wit, should researchers tell
those who ask whether they have the
predisposing gene? The millions of
people in the U.S with two APOE-ε4
genes appear to have a risk for
Alz-heimerÕs of more than 80 percent,
ac-cording to RosesÕs and othersÕ data
Learning that such a fate was probably
in store could cause people great
an-guish, the Duke researchers
acknowl-edge Yet already the Duke team has
had ÒhundredsÓ of requests from
indi-viduals who want to be tested, mainly
relatives of AlzheimerÕs patients,
Saun-ders says The group has obliged some
of them
ÒWeÕre not encouraging people to
get tested,Ó Saunders cautions The
in-vestigators fear that insurance
compa-nies may want to use the test to
iden-tify individuals who have the APOE-ε4
gene Some insurers have already
ap-proached the Duke team, Saunders
states
Nobody is claiming that APOE-ε4
is the one true cause of AlzheimerÕs
Still, the Þnding could catalyze other
breakthroughs A worker at the
Nation-al Institute of NeurologicNation-al Disease and
Stroke, who is pursuing an entirely
dif-ferent line of research on the disease,
thinks his Þndings could be linked to
the Duke discovery Daniel L Alkon,
who studies mechanisms of memory,
has, together with RenŽ Etcheberrigaray
and others, proposed in a paper in the
Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences that skin-tissue cells from
Alz-heimerÕs suÝerers have defective
mo-lecular channels of a particular type
The channels in question move
potassi-um ions across cell walls, and Alkon
says he was able to identify accurately
as victims of AlzheimerÕs 70
individu-als by examining their Þbroblast
potas-sium channels
Alkon already has ideas about
how aberrations causing the defective
channels might be linked to unusual
processing of amyloid beta-protein
and, thus, indirectly to its binding
part-ner apolipoprotein E The mystery of
AlzheimerÕs may be slowly coming
unraveled ÑTim Beardsley
Trang 17Marvin MinskyÕs ideas about the
mind mayĐor may notĐoÝer
lasting insights But they
certain-ly reveal much about the mind of
Min-sky According to Minsky, the mind is
not a uniÞed entity but a ỊsocietyĨ of
el-ements that both complement and
com-pete with one another MinskyÕs
empha-sis on multiplicity seems to transcend
science; he views single-mindedness
with a kind of horror ỊIf thereÕs
some-thing you like very much,
then you should regard this
not as you feeling good but
as a kind of brain cancer,Ĩ
he explains, Ịbecause it means
that some small part of your
mind has Þgured out how
to turn oÝ all the other
things.Ĩ
Minsky even recoils at the
tendency of ordinary mortals,
once they have invested the
time in learning to do
some-thing, to keep doing it To
counter this trait, which he
calls the investment principle,
Minsky has trained himself
to Ịenjoy the feeling of
awk-wardnessĨ aroused by
con-fronting an entirely new
prob-lem ỊItÕs so thrilling not to
be able to do something,Ĩ he
remarks
This credo has served
Min-sky well in his role as a
founding father of artiÞcial
intelligence Called AI by
in-siders, the Þeld is dedicated
to the proposition that brains
are nothing more than
ma-chines, albeit extremely
com-plicated ones, whose abilities
will someday be duplicated
by computers In pursuit of
the goals of AI, Minsky, who
turned 66 in August, has
drawn on computer science, robotics,
mathematics, neuroscience, psychology,
philosophy and even science Þction His
ideas have in turn inßuenced all these
Þelds as well as AI itself Colleagues
were scheduled to honor him on
Octo-ber 18 at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, from which he has ruled
the AI roost for more than 30 years
But the same traits that made Minsky
a successful pioneer of AI have led him
to become increasingly alienated fromthe Þeld as it matures Before my meet-ing with Minsky, in fact, other AI work-ers warn me that he might be somewhatcranky; if I do not want the interviewcut short, I should not ask him too di-rectly about the current slump in AI orwhat some workers characterize as hisown waning inßuence in the Þeld Oneprominent theorist pleads with me not
to take advantage of MinskyÕs
pen-chant for hyperbole ỊAsk him if hemeans it, and if he doesnÕt say it threetimes, you shouldnÕt use it,Ĩ the theo-rist urges
Minsky is rather edgy when I meethim in his oÛce at the ArtiÞcial Intelli-gence Laboratory He Þdgets ceaseless-
ly, blinking, waggling his foot, pushingthings about his desk Unlike most sci-entiÞc celebrities, he gives the impres-sion of conceiving ideas and tropes from
scratch rather than retrieving them frommemory He is often but not always in-cisive ỊIÕm rambling here,Ĩ he saysglumly after a riÝ on the nature of veri-Þcation in AI collapses in a heap of sen-tence fragments Even his physical ap-pearance has an improvisational air Hislarge, round head seems entirely baldbut is actually fringed by hairs as trans-parent as optical Þbers He wears a cro-cheted belt that supports, in addition tohis pants, a belly pack and a holstercontaining pliers with retractable jaws.With his paunch and vaguely Asian fea-
tures, he resembles a tech Buddha
high-Minsky is unable, or ling, to inhabit any emotionfor long Early on, as predict-
unwil-ed, he plays the geon His only rival in grasp-ing the mindÕs complexity isdead: Ị Freud has the besttheories so far, next to mine,
curmud-of what it takes to make amind,Ĩ Minsky declares If AIhas not progressed as fast
as it should have, that is cause modern researchershave succumbed to ỊphysicsenvyĨĐthe desire to reducethe intricacies of the brain tosimple formulaeĐand to thedreaded investment principle.ỊThey are deÞning smallerand smaller subspecialtiesthat they examine in moredetail, but theyÕre not open todoing things in a diÝerentway.Ĩ Even M.I.T.Õs own AI lab,which he founded, is guilty
be-ỊI donÕt consider this to be aserious research institution
at the moment,Ĩ he sneers.But a metamorphosis oc-curs when, touring the AI lab,
we stop to chat with some searchers in a lounge Minskyengages in amiable shoptalkabout chess-playing comput-ers He then recounts how the sciencefictionist Isaac Asimov, who just died, al-ways refused MinskyÕs invitations tosee the robots being built at M.I.T out
re-of fear that his imagination Ịwould beweighed down by this boring realism.ĨOne lounger, noticing that he andMinsky have the same pliers, yanks hisinstrument from its holster and with aßick of his wrist snaps the retractablejaws into place ỊEn garde,Ĩ he says Min-
PROFILE : MARVIN L MINSKY
The Mastermind of ArtiÞcial Intelligence
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN November 1993 35
Trang 18sky, grinning, draws his weapon, and
he and his challenger whip their pliers
repeatedly at each other, like punks
practicing their switchblade technique
Minsky expounds on both the
versatili-ty andĐan important point for himĐ
the drawbacks of the pliers; his pair
pinches him during certain maneuvers
ỊCan you take it apart with itself ? Ĩ
someone asks Minsky and his
col-leagues share a laugh at this reference
to a fundamental problem in robotics
Returning to MinskyÕs oÛce, we
en-counter a young, extremely pregnant
graduate student She is scheduled for
an oral doctoral exam the next day
ỊAre you nervous? Ĩ Minsky inquires ỊA
little,Ĩ she replies ỊYou shouldnÕt be,Ĩ he
says and gently touches his forehead to
hers I realize, watching this scene, that
there are many Minskys
Too many, according to Minsky As a
child, the son of a New York City
sur-geon, he was a prodigy in both
mathe-matics and music Minsky still
occasion-ally Þnds himself composing ỊBach-like
thingsĨĐan electric organ crowds his
officeĐbut he tries to resist the impulse
by convincing himself that music
sup-presses thought ỊI had to kill the
musi-cian at some point,Ĩ he says ỊIt comes
back every now and then, and I hit it.Ĩ
Minsky started to think about
think-ingĐor, more speciÞcally, about
learn-ingĐin high school Although he
re-ceived undergraduate and graduate
de-grees in mathematics (from Harvard
and Princeton universities, respectively),
he scavenged in other disciplines for
ideas he felt could illuminate the mind
In 1951 he and a colleague built a
ma-chine, made of vacuum tubes, motors
and servomechanisms, that could ỊlearnĨ
how to navigate a maze It was the Þrst
neural network ever built Minsky
fol-lowed this engineering project with a
doctoral thesis on automated learning
In 1959 he and John McCarthyĐwho
is credited with having coined the term
ỊartiÞcial intelligenceĨĐfounded what
became the M.I.T ArtiÞcial Intelligence
Laboratory McCarthy left four years
later to found his own laboratory at
Stanford University, and since then, he
and Minsky have had an intellectual
parting of the ways McCarthy has
cham-pioned AI models based on logic,
where-as Minsky contends that logic requires
precise deÞnitions that the real world
fails to respect The deÞnition of a bird
as a feathered animal that ßies, he
points out, does not apply if the bird is
dead or caged or has had its feet
en-cased in concrete Ịor has been
meditat-ing and decided ßymeditat-ing is egotistical.Ĩ
He has been even harder on neural
networks, the technology he helped to
nurture In 1969 he and Seymour Papert
of M.I.T presented a detailed critique of
a then popular neural network in a
book entitled Perceptrons The book is
often said to have dealt neural works a nearly mortal blow; funding fell
net-oÝ rapidly, and the Þeld languished formore than a decade before it slowly be-gan regenerating MinskyÕs intentionwas not to destroy the Þeld, as someobservers have claimedĐỊThatÕs crazy,Ĩ
he snapsĐbut to outline the limits ofthe technology
Although Minsky applauds the cent resurrection of neural networks, hecharges that some ỊsemicommercialĨresearchers are not as forthcoming asthey should be ỊThey write a paper say-ing, ƠLook, it did this,Õ and they donÕtconsider it equally wonderful to say,ƠLook, it canÕt do that.Õ Most of them arenot doing good science, because theyÕrehiding the deÞciencies.Ĩ Minsky insiststhat no single approach can reproducethe intricacies of the mind, because themind itself employs many fallible meth-ods that back up and check one anoth-
re-er The mind, he muses, is a tractor-trailer,rolling on many wheels, but AI workersỊkeep designing unicycles.Ĩ
Some aspects of the mind have provedharder to understand or reproduce thanMinsky expected He conÞrms the often-told anecdote that in the early 1960s heassigned artiÞcial vision, now recognized
as a profoundly diÛcult problem, to astudent as a summer project But heexpects all the major questions in AI to
be solved as imaging and electrodetechniques reveal the brain in everÞner detail ỊEverything weÕve done up
to now I regard as like chemistry beforeLavoisier,Ĩ he remarks
Minsky poured his thoughts about
thinking into The Society of Mind,
pub-lished in 1985 The book consists of 270essays, most of them only one pagelong, which range from rather technicaldiscussions of neural wiring to philo-sophical excursions into the nature ofhuman identity In the bookÕs prologue,Minsky contended that the workÕs at-omized structure reßects its majortheme, that Ịyou can build a mind frommany little parts, each mindless by it-self.Ĩ ỊAs far as I know, nobody readthe book,Ĩ Minsky grumbles
Minsky has nothing but contempt forthose who believe that computers, whilethey may be able to mimic certain as-pects of human intelligence, can neverbecome truly conscious ỊTheyÕre idiots,Ĩ
he fumes (Minsky is kinder to me when
I make the mistake of suggesting thatthere might always be a qualitative dif-ference between humans and artiÞcialmachines; he calls me a Ịracist.Ĩ)The mystery of consciousness is Ịtriv-ial,Ĩ Minsky declares ỊIÕve solved it, and
I donÕt understand why people donÕt ten.Ĩ Consciousness, Minsky explains,involves one part of the mind monitor-ing the behavior of other parts Thisfunction requires little more than short-term memory, or a Ịlow-grade systemfor keeping records.Ĩ In fact, computerprograms such as LISP, which havememory features that allow their pro-cessing steps to be retraced, are Ịex-tremely conscious,Ĩ Minsky assertsĐmore so than humans, who have piti-fully shallow short-term memories.Like many AI practitioners, Minskypredicts that computers will somedayevolve far beyond humans, who arenothing but Ịdressed-up chimpanzees.ĨHumans may be able to ỊdownloadĨtheir personalities into computers andthereby become smarter and more reli-able This trick may yield inÞnite life,among other perks Minsky envisionsmaking copies of himself that could un-dergo experiences he would otherwiseshun ỊI regard religious experience asvery risky, because it can destroy yourbrain But if I had a backup copyĐĨ
lis-Meanwhile the Ur-Minsky remains
restless Hollywood may provide one let for his energies That becomes clearwhen Laurel, an administrator at the AIlab, sticks her head in the oÛce to askwhatÕs new Minsky replies that the Dis-ney corporation has hired him to design
out-a Ịmout-agic cout-arpet ride,Ĩ bout-ased on its hit
movie Aladdin, for one of its theme
parks Minsky has been working on a tual-reality scheme at a laboratory Disneyhas set up for special effects ỊI loveit,Ĩ Minsky says of the laboratory ỊItÕsjust like the AI lab used to be.ĨNoting that Stephen W Hawking, theEnglish cosmologist, recently appeared
vir-on ỊStar Trek,Ĩ Laurel suggests that sky is well suited for playing Ịan aliengeniusĨ on the television show Evil orbenign? I ask ỊOh, either,Ĩ Laurel replies.Minsky seems intrigued, but he worriesthat he may be unable to rehearsescenes properly ỊI canÕt say the samething twice,Ĩ he confesses
Min-Minsky is also working on a new
book, The Emotion Machine ỊThatÕs a
person,Ĩ Minsky says of the title Onegoal of the book, he notes, is to helppeople think constructively about think-ing ỊIÕm interested in people who aretrying to do some work but keep watch-ing television or going to baseballgames.Ĩ The book will advise such peo-ple to make Ịa little block diagramĨ oftheir minds, with diÝerent, competingagents labeled I try to imagine Minsky
as a self-help guru, propounding his oriented program on ỊDonahue.Ĩ Then,recalling the way he comforted thepregnant graduate student, I think,Why not? ĐJohn Horgan
Trang 19AI-SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN November 1993 41
econciling economic growth with environmental protection is one of the greatest challenges now facing policymakers Unfortunately, these twin goals are widely seen as antithetical: the prescriptions for promoting one often seem to discourage the other In the following pages, two economists
debate whether unrestricted international trade, as embodied in proposals for
the General Agreement on Trade and TariÝs ( GATT ) and the North American
Free Trade Agreement ( NAFTA ), will harm or help the environment Jagdish
Bhagwati of Columbia University argues that freeing trade from ineÛcient
re-strictions may be the best way to achieve environmental protection while also
safeguarding prosperity and liberty To the contrary, insists Herman E Daly of
the World Bank : free trade left to itself may harm both the environment and
human welfare The authors oÝer starkly diÝerent predictions about the
pos-sible consequences of the new trade agreements.
Debate: Does Free Trade Harm the Environment?
R
D EBATE
Copyright 1993 Scientific American, Inc.
Trang 20Economists are reconciled to the
conßict of absolutes: that is why
they invented the concept of
trade-oÝs It should not surprise them,
there-fore, that the objective of
environmen-tal protection should at times run afoul
of the goal of seeking maximum gains
from trade In fact, economists would be
suspicious of any claims, such as those
made by soothsaying politicians, that
both causes would be only mutually
beneÞcial They are rightly disconcerted,
however, by the passion and the
feroci-ty, and hence often the lack of logic or
facts, with which environmental groups
have recently assailed both free trade
and the General Agreement on TariÝs
and Trade ( GATT ), the institution that
oversees the world trading system
The environmentalistsÕ antipathy to
trade is perhaps inevitable Trade has
been central to economic thinking since
Adam Smith discovered the virtues of
specialization and of the markets that
naturally sustain it Because markets do
not normally exist for the pursuit of
en-vironmental protection, they must be
specially created Trade therefore
sug-gests abstention from governmental
in-tervention, whereas environmentalism
suggests its necessity Then again, trade
is exploited and its virtues extolled bycorporate and multinational interests,whereas environmental objectives areembraced typically by nonproÞt orga-nizations, which are generally wary ofthese interests Trade is an ancient occu-pation, and its nurture is the objective
of institutions crafted over many years
of experience and reßection Protection
of the environment, on the other hand,
is a recent preoccupation of nationaland international institutions that arenascent and still evolving
Last year the environmentalistsÕ tility to trade exploded in outrage when
hos-an impartial GATT Dispute SettlementPanel ruled in favor of Mexico and freetrade and against the U.S and the wel-fare of the dolphin The U.S had placed
an embargo on the import of Mexicantuna on the grounds that the Þsh hadbeen caught in purse-seine nets, whichkill dolphins cruelly and in greater num-bers than U.S law permits The GATTpanel ruled, in eÝect, that the U.S couldnot suspend MexicoÕs trading rights byproscribing unilaterally the methods bywhich that country harvested tuna
This decision spurred the tionistsÕ subsequent campaigns againstfree trade and GATT GATT has noshortage of detractors, of course In fact,some of its recent critics have feared its impotence and declared it Ịdead,Ĩ re-ferring to it as the General Agreement toTalk and Talk But the environmentalistattacks, which presume instead GATTÕsomnipotence, are something else again
conserva-An advertisement by a coalition of
environmental groups in the New York
Times on April 20, 1992, set a new
stan-dard for alarmist, even scurrilous, ing, calculated to appeal to oneÕs in-stincts rather than oneÕs intellect It talks
writ-of Ịfaceless GATT bureaucratsĨ ing a Ịsneak attack on democracy.Ĩ Thisveiled reference to Pearl Harbor pro-
mount-vides an example of a common tactic intrade controversy : Japan-bashing Theinnuendos have continued unabatedand are manifest in the endless battles
in Congress over the supplemental ronmental accords for the North Amer-ican Free Trade Agreement ( NAFTA ).The hostility is also intruding on theconclusion of the Uruguay Round ofGATT talks, now in their seventh year,with the environmentalists opposing theestablishment of the new MultilateralTrade Organization, which is meant toprovide eÝective discipline and a nec-essary institutional structure for GATT
envi-It is surely tragic that the proponents
of two of the great causes of the 1990s,trade and the environment, should be
JAGDISH BHAGWATI is Arthur Lehman
Professor of Economics and professor of
political science at Columbia University
and was Ford International Professor of
Economics at the Massachusetts Institute
of Technology He has served as the
eco-nomic policy adviser to the
director-gen-eral of the Gendirector-gen-eral Agreement on TariÝs
and Trade Five volumes of his
collect-ed essays have been publishcollect-ed by MIT
Press His most recent books are
Protec-tionism (MIT Press, 1988) and The World
Trading System at Risk (Princeton
Uni-versity Press, 1991) He also writes
fre-quently for the New York Times, the Wall
Street Journal and the New Republic.
The Case for Free Trade
Environmentalists are wrong to fear
the e›ects of free trade Both causes
can be advanced by imaginative solutions
by Jagdish Bhagwati
DOLPHIN VERSUS FREE TRADE : the U.S.outlaws Þshing methods that result inthe death of dolphins such as this one,
Trang 21locked in combat The conßict is
large-ly gratuitous There are at times
philo-sophical diÝerences between the two
that cannot be reconciled, as when some
environmentalists assert natureÕs
au-tonomy, whereas most economists see
nature as a handmaiden to humankind
For the most part, however, the
diÝer-ences derive from misconceptions It is
necessary to dissect and dismiss the
more egregious of these fallacies
be-fore addressing the genuine problems
The fear is widespread among
envi-ronmentalists that free trade increases
economic growth and that growth harms
the environment That fear is misplaced
Growth enables governments to tax and
to raise resources for a variety of
objec-tives, including the abatement of tion and the general protection of theenvironment Without such revenues, lit-tle can be achieved, no matter how pureoneÕs motives may be
pollu-How do societies actually spend theseadditional revenues? It depends on howgetting rich aÝects the desire for a bet-ter environment Rich countries todayhave more groups worrying about en-vironmental causes than do poor coun-tries EÛcient policies, such as freertrade, should generally help environ-mentalism, not harm it
If one wants to predict what growthwill do to the environment, however,one must also consider how it will aÝectthe production of pollution Growth af-
fects not only the demand for a goodenvironment but also the supply of thepollution associated with growth Thenet eÝect on the environment will there-fore depend on the kind of economicgrowth Gene M Grossman and Alan B.Krueger of Princeton University foundthat in cities around the world sulfur di-oxide pollution fell as per capita incomerose The only exception was in coun-tries whose per capita incomes fell be-low $5,000 In short, environmentalistsare in error when they fear that trade,through growth, will necessarily increasepollution
Economic eÝects besides those butable to rising incomes also help toprotect the environment For example,freer trade enables pollution-Þghtingtechnologies available elsewhere to beimported Thus, trade in low-sulfur-con-tent coal will enable the users of localhigh-sulfur-content coal to shift fromthe latter to the former
attri-Free trade can also lead to better
environmental outcomes from ashift in the composition of pro-duction An excellent example is provid-
ed by Robert C Feenstra of the
Universi-ty of California at Davis He has shownhow the imposition of restraints on Jap-anese automobile exports to the U.S.during the 1980s shifted the compo-sition of those exports from small tolarge cars, as the Japanese attempted
to increase their revenues without creasing the number of units they sold.Yet the large cars were fuel ineÛcient.Thus, protective eÝorts by the U.S ef-fectively increased the average amount
in-of pollution produced by imported cars,making it more likely that pollutionfrom cars would increase rather thandiminish in the U.S
Although these erroneous objections
to free trade are readily dismissed (butnot so easily eliminated from public dis-course), there are genuine conßicts be-tween trade and the environment Tounderstand and solve them, economistsdraw a distinction between two kinds
of environmental problems: those thatare intrinsically domestic and those thatare intrinsically transnational
Should Brazil pollute a lake lying
whol-ly within its borders, the problem would
be intrinsically domestic Should it lute a river that ßows into Argentina,the matter would take on an intrinsi-cally transnational character Perhapsthe most important examples of trans-national pollution are acid rain, createdwhen sulfur dioxide emissions in onecountry precipitate into rain in anoth-
pol-er, and greenhouse gases, such as bon dioxide, which contribute to globalwarming wherever they are emitted
car-SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN November 1993 43
ensnared oÝ the U.S Atlantic coast But when the U.S attempted to apply its
stan-dard to Mexico by imposing an embargo on tuna imported from that country, an
international tribunal rejected the policy last year as an illegal restriction of trade
Copyright 1993 Scientific American, Inc.
Trang 22Why do intrinsically domestic
envi-ronmental questions create
internation-al concern? The main reason is the belief
that diversity in environmental
stan-dards may aÝect competitiveness
Busi-nesses and labor unions worry that their
rivals in other countries may gain an
edge if their governments impose lower
standards of environmental protection
They decry such diÝerences as unfair
To level the playing Þeld, these
lob-bies insist that foreign countries raise
their standards up to domestic ones In
turn, environmental groups worry that
if such Òharmonization upÓ is not
un-dertaken prior to freeing trade,
pres-sures from uncompetitive businesses
at home will force down domestic
stan-dards, reversing their hard-won
victor-ies Finally, there is the fear,
drama-tized by H Ross Perot in his criticisms
of NAFTA, that factories will relocate
to the countries whose environmental
standards are lowest
But if the competitiveness issue makes
the environmentalists, the businesses
and the unions into allies, the
environ-mentalists are on their own in other
ways Two problem areas can be
distin-guished First, some environmentalists
are keen to impose their own ethical
preferences on others, using trade
sanc-tions to induce or coerce acceptance
of such preferences For instance, tunaÞshing with purse-seine nets that killdolphins is opposed by U.S environmen-tal groups, which consequently favorrestraints on the importation of suchtuna from Mexico and elsewhere Sec-ond, other environmentalists fear thatthe rules of free trade, as embodied inGATT and strengthened in the UruguayRound, will constrain their freedom topursue even purely domestic environ-mental objectives, with GATT tribunalsoutlawing disputed regulation
Environmentalists have cause for
concern Not all concerns are gitimate, however, and not all thesolutions to legitimate concerns are sen-sible Worry over competitiveness hasthus led to the illegitimate demand that environmental standards abroad betreated as Òsocial dumping.Ó OÝendingcountries are regarded as unfairly sub-sidizing their exporters through lax en-vironmental requirements Such implic-
le-it subsidies, the reasoning continues,ought to be oÝset by import duties
Yet international diÝerences in ronmental standards are perfectly nat-ural Even if two countries share the
envi-same environmental objectives, the
spe-ciÞc pollutions they would attack, and
hence the industries they would
hin-der, will generally not be identical ico has a greater social incentive thandoes the U.S to spend an extra dollarpreventing dysentery rather than re-ducing lead in gasoline
Mex-Equally, a certain environmental goodmight be valued more highly by a poorcountry than by a rich one Contrast, forinstance, the value assigned to a lakewith the cost of cleaning up eÜuentsdischarged into it by a pharmaceuticalcompany In India such a lakeÕs watermight be drunk by a malnourished pop-ulation whose mortality would increasesharply with the rise in pollution In theU.S the water might be consumed byfew people, all of whom have the means
to protect themselves with privately chased water Þlters In this example,India would be the more likely to pre-fer clean water to the pharmaceuticalcompanyÕs proÞts
pur-The consequences of diÝering dards are clear : each country will haveless of the industry whose pollution itfears relatively more than other coun-tries do Indeed, even if there were nointernational trade, we would be shrink-ing industries whose pollution we de-ter This result follows from the policy
stan-of forcing polluters stan-of all stripes to payfor the harm they cause To object, then,
to the eÝects our negative valuation ofpollution have on a given industry is to
be in contradiction: we would be ing to face the consequences of our en-vironmental preferences
refus-Nevertheless, there is sentiment forenacting legislation against social dump-ing Senator Davil L Boren of Oklaho-
ma, the proponent of the InternationalPollution Deterrence Act of 1991, de-manded import duties on the groundsthat Òsome U.S manufacturers, such asthe U.S carbon and steel alloy industry,spend as much as 250 percent more onenvironmental controls as a percentage
of gross domestic product than do
oth-er countries I see the unfair tage enjoyed by other nations exploit-ing the environment and public healthfor economic gain when I look at manyindustries important to my own state.ÓSimilarly, Vice President Al Gore wrote
advan-in Earth advan-in the Balance: Ecology and the
Human Spirit that Òjust as government
subsidies of a particular industry aresometimes considered unfair under thetrade laws, weak and ineÝectual enforce-ment of pollution control measuresshould also be included in the deÞni-tion of unfair trading practices.ÓThese demands betray lack of eco-nomic logic, and they ignore politicalreality as well Remember that the so-called subsidy to foreign producersthrough lower standards is not givenbut only implied According to Senator
PERVERSE CONSEQUENCES for the environment may result from trade restrictions
This graph shows Japanese car exports to the U.S before and after JapanÕs
acqui-escence in voluntary export restraints Sales of small , fuel-eÛcient models declined,
whereas those of the larger Ògas guzzlersÓ soared
HONDA CIVICMAZDA GLCDATSUN 310
MAZDA 626
SOURCE: Robert C Feenstra, University of California, Davis
Trang 23Boren, the subsidy would be calculated
as Ịthe cost that would have to be
in-curred by the manufacturer or
produc-er of the foreign articles of mproduc-erchandise
to comply with environmental standards
imposed on U.S producers of the same
class of merchandise.Ĩ Anyone familiar
with the way dumping calculations are
made knows that the Environmental
Protection Agency could come up with
virtually any estimates it cared to
pro-duce Cynical politics would inevitably
dictate the calculations
Still, there may be political good
sense in assuaging
environmen-talistsÕ concerns about the
relo-cation of factories to countries with
lower standards The governments of
higher-standards countries could do
so without encumbering free trade by
insisting that their businesses accede
to the higher standards when they go
abroad Such a policy lies entirely
with-in the jurisdictional powers of a
higher-standards country Moreover, the
gov-ernments of lower-standards countries
would be most unlikely to object to
such an act of good citizenship by theforeign investors
Environmentalists oppose free tradefor yet another reason: they wish to usetrade policy to impose their values onother communities and countries Manyenvironmentalists want to suspend thetrading rights of countries that sanc-tion the use of purse-seine nets in tunaÞshing and of leg-hold traps in trap-ping Such punishments seem an in-appropriate use of state power, howev-
er The values in question are not
wide-ly accepted, such as human rights, butidiosyncratic One wonders when theopponents of purse-seine nets put theinterests of the dolphin ahead of those
of MexicoÕs people, who could prosperthrough more productive Þshing Toborrow the campaign manifesto of Pres-ident Bill Clinton: Should we not putpeople Þrst?
Moreover, once such values intrude
on free trade, the way is opened for
an endless succession of demands vironmentalists favor dolphins; Indi-ans have their sacred cows Animal-rights activists, who do not prefer one
En-species over another, will object to ourslaughterhouses
The moral militancy of talists in the industrialized world hasbegun to disillusion their closest coun-terparts in the undeveloped countries.These local environmentalists accusethe rich countries of Ịeco-imperialism,Ĩand they deny that the Western nationshave a monopoly on virtue The mostradical of todayÕs proenvironment mag-
environmen-azines in India, Down to Earth,
editorial-ized recently : ỊIn the current world ality trade is used as an instrument en-tirely by Northern countries to disciplineenvironmentally errant nations Surely, ifIndia or Kenya were to threaten to stoptrade with the U.S., it would hardly af-fect the latter But the fact of the mat-ter is that it is the Northern countriesthat have the greatest [adverse] impact
re-on the worldÕs envirre-onment.Ĩ
If many countries were to play thisgame, then repeated suspensions oftrading rights would begin to underminethe openness of the trading system andthe predictability and stability of interna-tional markets Some environmentalists
46 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN November 1993
EMPLOYMENT IN MEXICAN TUNA FISHERY may oÝset the
sav-ing of dolphins that would result were the industry to forgo
purse-seine nets Countries should not be faulted for placinghuman welfare ahead of our culture-speciÞc concerns
Copyright 1993 Scientific American, Inc.
Trang 24assert that each country should be free
to insist on the production methods
of its trading partners Yet these
envi-ronmentalists ignore the certain
con-sequence of their policy: a PandoraÕs box
of protectionism would open up
Rare-ly are production methods in an
indus-try identical in diÝerent countries
There are certainly better ways to
in-dulge the environmentalistsÕ propensity
to export their ethical preferences The
U.S environmental organizations can
lobby in Mexico to persuade its
govern-ment to adopt their views Private
boy-cotts can also be undertaken In fact,
boycotts can carry much clout in rich
countries with big markets, on which
the targeted poor countries often
de-pend The frequent and enormously
ex-pensive advertisements by
environmen-tal groups against GATT show also that
their resources far exceed those of the
cash-strapped countries whose policies
they oppose
Cost-beneÞt analysis leads one to
con-clude that unilateral governmental
sus-pension of othersÕ trading rights is not
an appropriate way to promote oneÕslesser ethical preferences Such sanc-tions can, on the other hand, appropri-ately be invoked multilaterally to defenduniversal moral values In such casesĐ
as in the censure of apartheid, as ticed until recently in South AfricaĐit
prac-is possible to secure widespread ment for sanctions With a large major-ity converted to the cause, GATTÕs waiv-
agree-er procedure can be used to suspendthe oÝending countryÕs trading rights
Environmentalists are also worried
about the obstacles that the rent and prospective GATT rulespose for environmental regulationsaimed entirely at domestic productionand consumption In principle, GATTlets a country enforce any regulationthat does not discriminate against oramong foreign suppliers One can, forexample, require airbags in cars, provid-
cur-ed that the rule applies to all bile makers GATT even permits rulesthat discriminate against trade for thepurpose of safety and health
automo-GATT, however, recognizes threeways in which regulations may be set
in gratuitous restraint of trade; in lowing procedures aimed at avoidingsuch outcomes, GATT upsets the envi-ronmentalists First, the true intentionĐand eÝectĐof a regulation may be toprotect not the environment but localbusiness Second, a country may im-pose more restrictions than necessary
fol-to achieve its stated environmental jective Third, it may set standards thathave no scientiÞc basis
ob-The issue of intentions is illustrated
by the recently settled Ịbeer warĨ tween Ontario and the U.S Five yearsago the Canadian province imposed a10-cents-a-can tax on beer, ostensibly
be-to discourage littering The U.S arguedthat the law in fact intended to discrim-inate against its beer suppliers, whoused aluminum cans, whereas local beercompanies used bottles Ontario hadomitted to tax the use of cans for juic-
es and soups, a step that would haveaÝected Ontario producers
The second problem is generally
PURE DRINKING WATER is essential for Mexican villagers,
who wait in line to collect it rather than risk contracting
chol-era from local sources The relative value of environmental
beneÞts varies in diÝerent countries: Mexico can better prove public health by concentrating its resources on the puri-Þcation of water than by reducing the lead in gasoline
Trang 25im-tougher because it is impossible to Þnd
alternative restrictions that accomplish
exactly the same environmental results
as the original policy at lower cost An
adjudicating panel is then forced to
eval-uate, implicitly or explicitly, the
trade-oÝs between the cost in trade disruption
and the cost in lesser fulÞllment of the
environmental objective It is therefore
likely that environmentalists and trade
experts will diÝer on which weights the
panel should assign to these divergent
interests
Environmentalists tend to be fearful
about the use of scientiÞc tests to
de-termine whether trade in a product can
be proscribed The need to prove oneÕs
case is always an unwelcome burden to
those who have the political power to
take unilateral action Yet the trade
ex-perts have the better of the argument
Imagine that U.S growers sprayed
ap-ples with the pesticide Alar, whereas
Eu-ropean growers did not, and that
Euro-pean consumers began to agitate against
Alar as harmful Should the European
Community be allowed to end the
im-portation of the U.S apples without
meeting some scientiÞc test of its health
concerns? Admittedly, even hard science
is often not hard enoughÑdiÝerent
studies may reach diÝerent conclusions
But without the restraining hand of
sci-ence, the itch to indulge oneÕs fearsÑ
and to play on the fears of othersÑ
would be irresistible
In all cases, the moderate
environ-mentalists would like to see GATT adopt
more transparent procedures for
adjudi-cating disputes They also desire
great-er legal standing to Þle briefs when ronmental regulations are at issue Thesegoals seem both reasonable and feasible
envi-Not all environmental problems
are local ; some are truly global,such as the greenhouse eÝectand the depletion of the stratosphericozone They raise more issues that re-quire cooperative, multilateral solutions
Such solutions must be both eÛcientand equitable Still, it is easy to see thatrich countries might use their econom-
ic power to reach protocols that mize eÛciency at the expense of poor-
maxi-er countries
For instance, imagine that the ers of a protocol were to ask Brazil torefrain from cutting down its rain for-ests while allowing industrialized coun-tries to continue emitting carbon diox-ide They might justify this request onthe grounds that it costs Brazil less tokeep a tree alive, absorbing a unit ofcarbon dioxide every year, than it wouldcost the U.S or Germany to save a unit
draft-by burning less oil Such a trade-oÝwould indeed be economically eÛcient
Yet if Brazil, a poorer country, were thenleft with the bill, the solution would as-suredly be inequitable
Before any group of countries
impos-es trade sanctions on a country thathas not joined a multilateral protocol,
it would be important to judge whetherthe protocol is indeed fair Nonmemberstargeted for trade sanctions should havethe right to get an impartial hearing of
their objections, requiring the strong todefend their actions even when they ap-pear to be entirely virtuous
The simultaneous pursuit of the twocauses of free trade and a protectedenvironment often raises problems, to
be sure But none of these conßicts isbeyond resolution with goodwill and
by imaginative institutional innovation.The aversion to free trade and GATTthat many environmentalists display isunfounded, and it is time for them toshed it Their admirable moral passionand certain intellectual vigor are betterdevoted to building bridges between thecauses of trade and the environment
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN November 1993 49
FURTHER READING
AMERICAN RULES, MEXICAN JOBS Jagdish
Bhagwati in New York Times, Section A,
page 21, col 1; March 24, 1993
ÒCIRCUMVENTINGÓ DEMOCRACY: THE LITICAL MORALITY OF TRADE NEGOTIA-
PO-TIONS Robert E Hudec in New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol 25, No 2, pages 401Ð
412; September/October 1993
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF A NORTH
AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT.Gene M Grossman and Alan B Krueger
in The Mexico-U.S Free Trade ment Edited by Peter M Garber MIT
Agree-Press, 1993
TRADE AND ENVIRONMENT: DOES RONMENTAL DIVERSITY DETRACT FROMTHE CASE FOR FREE TRADE? JagdishBhagwati and T N Srinivasan Mimeo-graph Yale University, 1993
ENVI-BENEFITS OF TRADE ßow from the economies achieved when
countries specialize in enterprises in which they enjoy
compar-ative advantage Such specialization will proceed better whenall sides trust in the stability of the trading regime
Copyright 1993 Scientific American, Inc.
Trang 26No policy prescription commands
greater consensus among
econ-omists than that of free trade
based on international specialization
ac-cording to comparative advantage Free
trade has long been presumed good
un-less proved otherwise That
presump-tion is the cornerstone of the existing
General Agreement on TariÝs and Trade
( GATT ) and the proposed North
Amer-ican Free Trade Agreement ( NAFTA)
The proposals in the Uruguay Round of
negotiations strengthen GATTÕs basic
commitment to free trade and
econom-ic globalization
Yet that presumption should be
re-versed The default position should
fa-vor domestic production for domestic
markets When convenient, balanced
in-ternational trade should be used, but
it should not be allowed to govern a
countryÕs aÝairs at the risk of
environ-mental and social disaster The
domes-tic economy should be the dog and
in-ternational trade its tail GATT seeks to
tie all the dogsÕ tails together so tightly
that the international knot would wag
the separate national dogs
The wiser course was well expressed
in the overlooked words of John
May-nard Keynes: ÒI sympathize, therefore,with those who would minimize, ratherthan those who would maximize, eco-nomic entanglement between nations
Ideas, knowledge, art, hospitality, elÑthese are the things which should
trav-of their nature be international But letgoods be homespun whenever it is rea-sonably and conveniently possible; and,above all, let Þnance be primarily na-tional.Ó Contrary to Keynes, the defend-ers of the proposed Uruguay Round
of changes to GATT not only want todownplay Òhomespun goods,Ó they alsowant Þnance and all other services tobecome primarily international
Economists and environmentalistsare sometimes represented as being,respectively, for and against free trade,but that polarization does the argu-ment a disservice Rather the real de-bate is over what kinds of regulationsare to be instituted and what goals arelegitimate The free traders seek to max-imize proÞts and production withoutregard for considerations that repre-sent hidden social and environmentalcosts They argue that when growth hasmade people wealthy enough, they willhave the funds to clean up the damagedone by growth Conversely, environ-mentalists and some economists, my-self among them, suspect that growth
is increasing environmental costs fasterthan beneÞts from productionÑthere-
by making us poorer, not richer
A more accurate name than the suasive label Òfree tradeÓÑbecause whocan be opposed to freedom?Ñis Òdereg-ulated international commerce.Ó Dereg-ulation is not always a good policy: re-call the recent experience of the U.S
per-with the deregulation of the savings andloan institutions As one who formerlytaught the doctrine of free trade to col-lege students, I have some sympathy forthe free tradersÕ view Nevertheless, mymajor concern about my profession to-day is that our disciplinary preference
for logically beautiful results over tually grounded policies has reachedsuch fanatical proportions that we econ-omists have become dangerous to theearth and its inhabitants
fac-The free trade position is grounded inthe logic of comparative advantage, Þrstexplicitly formulated by the early 19th-century British economist David Ricar-
do He observed that countries with ferent technologies, customs and re-sources will incur diÝerent costs whenthey make the same products Onecountry may Þnd it comparatively lesscostly to mine coal than to grow wheat,but in another country the oppositemay be true If nations specialize in the
dif-The Perils
of Free Trade
Economists routinely ignore its hidden costs
to the environment and the community
by Herman E Daly
HERMAN E DALY is senior economist
in the environment department of the
World Bank in Washington, D.C Before
joining the bank in 1988, he was alumni
professor of economics at Louisiana State
University He holds a B.A from Rice
University and a Ph.D from Vanderbilt
University Daly has taught in Brazil as a
Ford Foundation Visiting Professor and
as a Senior Fulbright Scholar He has also
served as a research associate at Yale
University and as a visiting fellow at the
Australian National University
Co-found-er and associate editor of Ecological
Eco-nomics, Daly has written several books,
including Steady-State Economics The
views expressed here by Daly should not
be attributed to the World Bank
POLLUTING is one way in which tries can ÒexternalizeÓ some of the costsassociated with production Industrieshave proÞt incentives to produce goods
Trang 27indus-products for which they have a
com-parative advantage and trade freely to
obtain others, everyone beneÞts
The problem is not the logic of this
argument It is the relevance of
Ricar-doÕs critical but often forgotten
assump-tion that factors of producassump-tion
(espe-cially capital ) are internationally
immo-bile In todayÕs world, where billions
of dollars can be transferred between
nations at the speed of light, that
es-sential condition is not met Moreover,
free traders encourage such foreign
in-vestment as a development strategy In
short, the free traders are using an
ar-gument that hinges on the
impermabil-ity of national boundaries to capital to
support a policy aimed at making thosesame boundaries increasingly perme-able to both capital and goods!
That fact alone invalidates the sumption that international trade willinevitably beneÞt all its partners Fur-thermore, for trade to be mutually ben-eÞcial, the gains must not be oÝset byhigher liabilities After specialization,
as-nations are no longer free not to trade,
and that loss of independence can be aliability Also, the cost of transportinggoods internationally must not cancelout the proÞts Transport costs are en-ergy intensive Today, however, the cost
of energy is frequently subsidized bygovernments through investment tax
credits, federally subsidized researchand military expenditures that ensureaccess to petroleum The environmen-tal costs of fossil-fuel burning also donot factor into the price of gasoline Tothe extent that energy is subsidized,then, so too is trade The full cost of en-ergy, stripped of these obscuring subsi-dies, would therefore reduce the initialgains from long-distance trade, wheth-
er international or interregional
Free trade can also introduce new
ineÛciencies Contrary to the plications of comparative advan-tage, more than half of all internation-
al trade involves the simultaneous port and export of essentially the samegoods For example, Americans importDanish sugar cookies, and Danes importAmerican sugar cookies Exchangingrecipes would surely be more eÛcient
im-It would also be more in accord withKeynesÕs dictum that knowledge should
be international and goods homespun(or in this case, homebaked )
Another important but seldom tioned corollary of specialization is areduction in the range of occupation-
men-al choices Uruguay has a clear ative advantage in raising cattle andsheep If it adhered strictly to the rule ofspecialization and trade, it would aÝordits citizens only the choice of being ei-ther cowboys or shepherds Yet Uru-guayans feel a need for their own legal,Þnancial, medical, insurance and educa-tional services, in addition to basic agri-culture and industry That diversity en-tails some loss of eÛciency, but it is nec-essary for community and nationhood.Uruguay is enriched by having a sym-phony orchestra of its own, even though
compar-it would be cost-eÝective to import ter symphony concerts in exchange forwool, mutton, beef and leather Individ-uals, too, must count the broader range
bet-of choices as a welfare gain: even thosewho are cowboys and shepherds aresurely enriched by contact with coun-
trymen who are not vaqueros or
pas-tores My point is that the community
di-mension of welfare is completely looked in the simplistic argument that
over-if specialization and trade increase theper capita availability of commodities,they must be good
Let us assume that even after thoseliabilities are subtracted from the grossreturns on trade, positive net gains stillexist They must still oÝset deeper,more fundamental problems The argu-ments for free trade run afoul of thethree basic goals of all economic poli-
cies: the eÛcient allocation of
resourc-es, the fair distribution of resources and the maintenance of a sustainable scale
of resource use The Þrst two are
tradi-SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN November 1993 51
in countries with permissive pollution, health and labor standards and then to sell
the goods elsewhere Yet that competitive pressure can drive down higher
stan-dards TariÝs that eliminate these unfair advantages are therefore essential for
protecting the global eÛciency of resource use
Copyright 1993 Scientific American, Inc.
Trang 28tional goals of neoclassical economics.
The third has only recently been
recog-nized and is associated with the
view-point of ecological, or steady-state,
eco-nomics It means that the input of raw
materials and energy to an economy and
the output of waste materials and heat
must be within the regenerative and
ab-sorptive capacities of the ecosystem
In neoclassical economics the eÛcient
allocation of resources depends on the
counting and internalization of all costs
Costs are internalized if they are directly
paid by those entities responsible for
themÑas when, for example, a
manu-facturer pays for the disposal of its
fac-tory wastes and raises its prices to
cov-er that expense Costs are extcov-ernalized
if they are paid by someone elseÑas
when the public suÝers extra disease,
stench and nuisance from uncollected
wastes Counting all costs is the very
basis of eÛciency
Economists rightly urge nations to
follow a domestic program of
internal-izing costs into prices They also
wrong-ly urge nations to trade freewrong-ly with
oth-er countries that do not intoth-ernalize theircosts (and consequently have lower pric-es) If a nation tries to follow both thosepolicies, the conßict is clear: free com-petition between diÝerent cost-internal-izing regimes is utterly unfair
International trade increases tition, and competition reduces costs
compe-But competition can reduce costs in twoways: by increasing eÛciency or by low-ering standards A Þrm can save money
by lowering its standards for pollutioncontrol, worker safety, wages, healthcare and so onÑall choices that exter-nalize some of its costs ProÞt-maximiz-ing Þrms in competition always have anincentive to externalize their costs to thedegree that they can get away with it
For precisely that reason, nationsmaintain large legal, administrative andauditing structures that bar reductions
in the social and environmental dards of domestic industries There are
stan-no analogous international bodies oflaw and administration; there are only
national laws, which diÝer widely sequently, free international trade en-courages industries to shift their pro-duction activities to the countries thathave the lowest standards of cost inter-nalizationÑhardly a move toward glob-
Con-al eÛciency
Attaining cheapness by ignoring
real costs is a sin against ciency Even GATT recognizesthat requiring citizens of one country
eÛ-to compete against foreign prison bor would be carrying standards-low-ering competition too far GATT there-fore allows the imposition of restric-tions on such trade Yet it makes nosimilar exception for child labor, for un-insured risky labor or for subsistence-wage labor
la-The most practical solution is to mit nations that internalize costs tolevy compensating tariÝs on trade withnations that do not ÒProtectionismÓÑshielding an ineÛcient industry againstmore eÛcient foreign competitorsÑis
per-a dirty word per-among economists Thper-at isvery diÝerent, however, from protect-ing an eÛcient national policy of full-cost pricing from standards-loweringinternational competition
Such tariÝs are also not without cedent Free traders generally praise thefairness of ÒantidumpingÓ tariÝs thatdiscourage countries from trading ingoods at prices below their productioncosts The only real diÝerence is thedecision to include the costs of environ-mental damage and community welfare
pre-in that reckonpre-ing
This tariÝ policy does not imply theimposition of one countryÕs environ-mental preferences or moral judgments
on another country Each country shouldset the rules of cost internalization inits own market Whoever sells in a na-tionÕs market should play by that na-tionÕs rules or pay a tariÝ suÝicient toremove the competitive advantage oflower standards For instance, under theMarine Mammal Protection Act, all tunasold in the U.S (whether by U.S or Mex-ican Þshermen) must count the cost
of limiting the kill of dolphin
associat-ed with catching tuna Tuna sold in theMexican market (whether by U.S or Mex-ican Þshermen) need not include thatcost No standards are being imposedthrough Òenvironmental imperialismÓ;paying the costs of a nationÕs environ-mental standards is merely the price ofadmission to its market
Indeed, free trade could be accused
of reverse environmental imperialism.When Þrms produce under the mostpermissive standards and sell their prod-ucts elsewhere without penalty, theypress on countries with higher stan-
When there is no international trade, each country’s production is limited
en-tirely by its own capital and resources Some products are comparatively less
expensive to produce than others on a per unit basis
When there is free trade, countries can specialize based on comparative
ad-vantage All of a country’s capital can be invested in making one product
Ab-solute cost differences between the countries do not matter The hidden
as-sumption is that capital cannot cross borders
If capital is also mobile, capital can follow absolute advantage rather than
comparative advantage As in this example, one country may end up producing
everything if it has lower absolute costs
TRADE
PRODUCTIONCOSTS
TRADE
CAPITALPRODUCTSHow Comparative Advantage Works
Trang 29dards to lower them In eÝect,
unre-stricted trade imposes lower standards
Unrestricted international trade also
raises problems of resource
distribu-tion In the world of comparative
ad-vantage described by Ricardo, a nationÕs
capital stays at home, and only goods
are traded If Þrms are free to relocate
their capital internationally to
wherev-er their production costs would be
low-est, then the favored countries have not
merely a comparative advantage but an
absolute advantage Capital will drain
out of one country and into another,
perhaps making what H Ross Perot
called Òa giant sucking soundÓ as jobsand wealth move with it This special-ization will increase world production,but without any assurance that all theparticipating countries will beneÞt
When capital ßows abroad, the tunity for new domestic employmentdiminishes, which drives down the pricefor domestic labor Even if free tradeand capital mobility raise wages in low-wage countries (and that tendency isthwarted by overpopulation and rapidpopulation growth), they do so at theexpense of labor in the high-wage coun-tries They thereby increase income in-equality there Most citizens are wageearners In the U.S., 80 percent of thelabor force is classiÞed as Ònonsupervi-sory employees.Ó Their real wages havefallen 17 percent between 1973 and
oppor-1990, in signiÞcant part because oftrade liberalization
Nor does labor in low-wage countriesnecessarily gain from free trade It islikely that NAFTA will ruin Mexicanpeasants when ÒinexpensiveÓ U.S corn(subsidized by depleting topsoil, aqui-fers, oil wells and the federal treasury)can be freely imported Displaced peas-ants will bid down wages Their landwill be bought cheaply by agribusiness-
es to produce fancy vegetables and cutßowers for the U.S market Ironically,
Mexico helps to keep U.S corn siveÓ by exporting its own vanishing re-serves of oil and genetic crop variants,which the U.S needs to sustain its cornmonoculture
Òinexpen-Neoclassical economists admit thatoverpopulation can spill over from onecountry to another in the form of cheaplabor They acknowledge that fact as
an argument against free immigration.Yet capital can migrate toward abun-dant labor even more easily than laborcan move toward capital The legitimatecase for restrictions on labor immigra-tion is therefore easily extended to re-strictions on capital emigration
When confronted with such
problems, neoclassical mists often answer that growthwill solve them The allocation problem
econo-of standards-lowering competition, theysay, will be dealt with by universallyÒharmonizingÓ all standards upward.The distribution problem of falling wag-
es in high-wage countries would only
be temporary ; the economists believethat growth will eventually raise wagesworldwide to the former high-wage lev-
el and beyond
Yet the goal of a sustainable scale
of total resource use forces us to ask :What will happen if the entire popu-lation of the earth consumes resourc-
es at the rate of high-wage countries?Neoclassical economists generally ignorethis question or give the facile responsethat there are no limits
The steady-state economic paradigmsuggests a diÝerent answer The regen-erative and assimilative capacities ofthe biosphere cannot support even thecurrent levels of resource consumption,much less the manyfold increase re-quired to generalize the higher stan-
54 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN November 1993
GO ODS AND SERVICE S
DIFFERENT VIEWS OF ECONOMIES distinguish neoclassical
and steady-state economics Neoclassical economics pictures
the economy as an isolated system (left) in which exchange
value circulates between industries and households Neither
matter nor energy enters or leaves the system, so the
econ-omy can be of any size In the steady-state view (right) the
economy is only one component of a larger ecosystem inwhich materials are transformed and energy is converted toheat As the economy grows larger, its behavior must con-form more closely to that of the total ecosystem
RAISING THE INCOMES in the more ulous, less wealthy nations will be dif-Þcult Over the next 40 years, the pop-ulation will double To reach the higherlevel of per capita income, the low- andmiddle-income countries would have toincrease their use of resources by a factor of almost 36 (21× 2 × 0.85) To avoid augmenting the damage to the en-vironment, they would need to boost re-source-use eÛciency by the same factor
Copyright 1993 Scientific American, Inc.
Trang 30dards worldwide Still less can the
eco-system aÝord an ever growing
popu-lation that is striving to consume more
per capita As a species, we already
pre-empt about 40 percent of the
land-based primary product of
photosynthe-sis for human purposes What happens
to biodiversity if we double the human
population, as we are projected to do
over the next 30 to 50 years?
These limits put a brake on the
abil-ity of growth to wash away the
prob-lems of misallocation and
maldistri-bution In fact, free trade becomes a
rec-ipe for hastening the speed with which
competition lowers standards for
eÛ-ciency, distributive equity and
ecologi-cal sustainability
Notwithstanding those enormous
problems, the appeal of bigger free
trade blocs for corporations is obvious
The broader the free trade area, the less
answerable a large and footloose
cor-poration will be to any local or even
national community Spatial separation
of the places that suÝer the costs and
enjoy the beneÞts becomes more
fea-sible The corporation will be able to
buy labor in the low-wage markets and
sell its products in the remaining
high-wage, high-income markets The larger
the market, the longer a corporation
will be able to avoid the logic of Henry
Ford, who realized that he had to pay
his workers enough for them to buy his
cars That is why transnational rations like free trade and why workersand environmentalists do not
corpo-In the view of steady-state
econom-ics, the economy is one open system in a Þnite, nongrowing andmaterially closed ecosystem An opensystem takes matter and energy fromthe environment as raw materials andreturns them as waste A closed sys-tem is one in which matter constantlycirculates internally while only energyßows through Whatever enters a sys-tem as input and exits as output iscalled throughput Just as an organismsurvives by consuming nutrients andexcreting wastes, so too an economymust to some degree both deplete andpollute the environment A steady-stateeconomy is one whose throughput re-mains constant at a level that neitherdepletes the environment beyond itsregenerative capacity nor pollutes it be-yond its absorptive capacity
sub-Most neoclassical economic analysestoday rest on the assumption that theeconomy is the total system and na-ture is the subsystem The economy
is an isolated system involving only
a circular ßow of exchange value tween Þrms and households Neithermatter nor energy enters or exits thissystem The economyÕs growth is there-fore unconstrained Nature may be Þ-
be-nite, but it is seen as just one sector
of the economy, for which other sectorscan substitute without limiting over-all growth
Although this vision of circular ßow
is useful for analyzing exchanges tween producers and consumers, it isactively misleading for studying scaleÑthe size of the economy relative to theenvironment It is as if a biologistÕs vi-sion of an animal contained a circula-tory system but not a digestive tract orlungs Such a beast would be indepen-dent of its environment, and its sizewould not matter If it could move, itwould be a perpetual motion machine.Long ago the world was relativelyempty of human beings and their be-longings (man-made capital ) and rela-tively full of other species and theirhabitats (natural capital ) Years of eco-nomic growth have changed that basicpattern As a result, the limiting factor
be-on future ecbe-onomic growth has changed
If man-made and natural capital weregood substitutes for one another, thennatural capital could be totally replaced.The two are complementary, however,which means that the short supply ofone imposes limits What good are Þsh-ing boats without populations of Þsh?
Or sawmills without forests? Once thenumber of Þsh that could be sold atmarket was primarily limited by thenumber of boats that could be built and
MAQUILADORAS, or factories near the border between the
U.S and Mexico, have become a troublesome source of
pollu-tion for that area Some U.S manufacturers have built such
factories in Mexico to take advantage of that countryÕs lower
labor costs and pollution-control standards If commerce comes less regulated, such problems may become more com-mon Mexican environmentalists closed this plant after show-ing that it was contaminating its vicinity with lead
Trang 31be-manned; now it is limited by the
num-ber of Þsh in the sea
As long as the scale of the human
economy was very small relative to the
ecosystem, no apparent sacriÞce was
involved in increasing it The scale of
the economy is now such that painless
growth is no longer reasonable If we
see the economy as a subsystem of a
Þ-nite, nongrowing ecosystem, then there
must be a maximal scale for its
through-put of matter and energy More
impor-tant, there must also be an optimal
scale Economic growth beyond that
op-timum would increase the
environmen-tal costs faster than it would the
pro-duction beneÞts, thereby ushering in
an antieconomic phase that
impover-ished rather than enriched
One can Þnd disturbing evidence that
we have already passed that point and,
like Alice in Through the Looking Glass,
the faster we run the farther behind we
fall Thus, the correlation between gross
national product (GNP) and the index of
sustainable economic welfare (which is
based on personal consumption and
ad-justed for depletion of natural capital
and other factors) has taken a negative
turn in the U.S
Like our planet, the economy may
continue forever to develop
qualitative-ly, but it cannot grow indeÞnitely and
must eventually settle into a steady
state in its physical dimensions That
condition need not be miserable,
how-ever We economists need to make the
elementary distinction between growth
(a quantitative increase in size
result-ing from the accretion or assimilation
of materials) and development (the
qual-itative evolution to a fuller, better or
dif-ferent state) Quantitative and
qualita-tive changes follow diÝerent laws
Con-ßating the two, as we currently do in
the GNP, has led to much confusion
Development without growth is
sus-tainable development An economy that
is steady in scale may still continue to
develop a greater capacity to satisfy man wants by increasing the eÛciency
hu-of its resource use, by improving socialinstitutions and by clarifying its ethicalprioritiesÑbut not by increasing the re-source throughput
In the light of the growth versus
de-velopment distinction, let us return
to the issue of international tradeand consider two questions: What is thelikely eÝect of free trade on growth?
What is the likely eÝect of free trade ondevelopment?
Free trade is likely to stimulate thegrowth of throughput It allows a coun-try in eÝect to exceed its domestic re-generative and absorptive limits byÒimportingÓ those capacities from oth-
er countries True, a country ÒexportingÓsome of its carrying capacity in returnfor imported products might have in-creased its throughput even more if ithad made those products domestically
Overall, nevertheless, trade does pone the day when countries must face
post-up to living within their natural erative and absorptive capacities Thatsome countries still have excess carryingcapacity is more indicative of a shortfall
regen-in their desired domestic growth than ofany conscious decision to reserve thatcapacity for export
By spatially separating the costs andbeneÞts of environmental exploitation,international trade makes them harder
to compare It thereby increases the dency for economies to overshoot theiroptimal scale Furthermore, it forcescountries to face tightening environmen-tal constraints more simultaneously andless sequentially than would otherwise
ten-be the case They have less opportunity
to learn from one anotherÕs experienceswith controlling throughput and lesscontrol over their local environment
The standard arguments for free tradebased on comparative advantage alsodepend on static promotions of efÞcien-
cy In other words, free trade in
tox-ic wastes promotes stattox-ic eÛciency by allowing the disposal of wastes wher-ever it costs less according to todayÕsprices and technologies A more dynam-
ic eÛciency would be served by lawing the export of toxins That stepwould internalize the disposal costs oftoxins to their place of originÑto boththe Þrm that generated them and thenation under whose laws the Þrm oper-ated This policy creates an incentive toÞnd technically superior ways of deal-ing with the toxins or of redesigningprocesses to avoid their production inthe Þrst place
out-All these allocative, distributional andscale problems stemming from freetrade ought to reverse the traditionaldefault position favoring it Measures
to integrate national economies furthershould now be treated as a bad idea un-less proved otherwise in speciÞc cases
As Ronald Findley of Columbia sity characterized it, comparative ad-vantage may well be the Òdeepest andmost beautiful result in all of econom-ics.Ó Nevertheless, in a full world of in-ternationally mobile capital, our adher-ence to it for policy direction is a rec-ipe for national disintegration
Univer-SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN November 1993 57
FURTHER READING
FOR THE COMMON GOOD H E Daly and
J B Cobb, Jr Beacon Press, 1989
INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND THE RONMENT Edited by Patrick Low WorldBank, 1992
ENVI-POPULATION, TECHNOLOGY AND STYLE: THE TRANSITION TO SUSTAIN-ABILITY Edited by Robert Goodland et
LIFE-al Island Press, Washington, D.C., 1992.MYTHS AND MISCONCEPTIONS OF FREE
TRADE Ravi Batra ScribnerÕs, 1993.INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND ENVIRON-MENT Edited by Carl Folke et al Special
issue of Ecological Economics, Vol 9,
No 1; February 1994 (in press)
NATIONAL SELF-SUFFICIENCY is a good commonly overlooked
by free traders Just as nations are better oÝ having their own
symphony orchestras and other cultural oÝerings, they shouldalso keep their vital industries local
Copyright 1993 Scientific American, Inc.
Trang 32As long ago as 1904, the British
sci-entist T R Elliot proposed
cor-rectly that neurons (nerve cells)
often communicate with one another
and with other cell types not
electrical-ly but chemicalelectrical-ly He suggested that an
action potential, or electrical impulse,
propagating along an excited neuron
triggers the release of chemicals (now
called neurotransmitters) from the
ex-cited cell In turn, the liberated
chemi-cals may cause another cell to take in or
extrude selected ions By thus altering
the ßow of charge across the membrane
of this second cell, the
neurotransmit-ters can give rise to a new impulse
Since then, investigators have
identi-fied perhaps 50 neurotransmitters and
have learned that a single neuron may
secrete several of them Workers have
also struggled to explain just how
neu-rotransmitters, particularly those in the
brain, manage to regulate ionic
trans-port, and hence impulse production, in
the cells they inßuence
The solution to this last problem has
emerged slowly, but research in my
laboratory at the Pasteur Institute in
Paris and in other laboratories during
the past 25 years has made great
head-way We have ascertained that
recep-tors for neurotransmittersÑwhich
pro-trude from cell membranesÑplay a
piv-otal role in mediating the conversion of
chemical signals into electrical activity
And we have begun to clarify how
cer-tain major receptors carry out this
challenging task Those molecules have
been found to constitute a remarkablesuperfamily of neurotransmitter recep-tors that are known as neurotransmit-ter-gated ion channels
Much of this insight derives from tensive study in the 1970s and 1980s
in-of a receptor initially isolated from theelectricity-generating organ of an elec-tric Þsh Yet the story of how investiga-tors solved the mysteries of impulsetransmission by chemicals more prop-erly begins decades earlier, with the pi-oneering contributions of John New-port Langley of the University of Cam-bridge In 1906 he proposed that bodilytissues bear receptors for drugs In sodoing, he provided one of the Þrst sig-niÞcant clues to the means by whichneurotransmitters exert their eÝects
Langley based his proposal on ies he conducted into how the poisoncurare kills its victims When he under-took these investigations, he was awarethat curare causes asphyxiation: itblocks motor nerves from inducing con-traction of respiratory muscles Hewondered, though, whether it acted onthe nerves or on the muscles To Þndout, he placed large doses of nicotine, asubstance that normally induces con-traction, directly onto strips of skeletalmuscle from chicken (at a site wheremotor nerves are normally connected)
stud-A contraction followed Then he appliedcurare The drug blocked nicotineÕs ac-tion Langley concluded that curare in-teracts directly with muscle tissue,which displays on its surface an Òespe-cially excitable component,Ó or Òrecep-tive substance,Ó capable of combiningwith either nicotine or curare
Neurobiologists now understand thatnicotine and curare couple with the part
of the receptor molecule designed tobind to the neurotransmitter acetylcho-line Bound nicotine serves as an ago-nist : it mimics the stimulatory eÝect
of a naturally produced substance,
ace-tylcholine Bound curare, in contrast, is
a competitive antagonist: it issues nostimulatory signal and, at the sametime, prevents acetylcholine and nico-tine from doing so
Despite the brilliance of the
re-ceptor concept, its value eludedthe scientific community for de-cades Skepticism arose in part becausescientists lacked the tools for isolatingreceptors Moreover, they had troubleimagining how binding of a chemical to
a receptor molecule at the cell surfacecould inßuence the ßow of ions throughchannels in the cell membrane
I helped to ease these objections inthe mid-1960s, when, as a graduate stu-dent working on my doctoral disser-tation, I suggested a theoretical solu-tion to this conceptual diÛculty A fewyears earlier, structural studies of hemo-globin and various enzymes had indi-cated that these molecules includedseveral separate sites capable of associ-ating with other substances IÑtogeth-
er with my teachers Jacques Monod andFran•ois Jacob and their colleague JeÝ-ries WymanÑpostulated that certain en-zymes may be activated by allosteric,
or indirect, means, by which binding atone site inßuences behavior of anothersite without any assistance from an ad-ditional source of energy We assumed
Chemical Signaling
in the Brain
Studies of acetylcholine receptors in the electric organs
of fish have generated critical insights into how neurons in the human brain communicate with one another
by Jean-Pierre Changeux
JEAN-PIERRE CHANGEUX has been
di-rector of the molecular neurobiology
unit of the Pasteur Institute in Paris since
1972 He is also a professor at the
insti-tute and at the College of France
Chang-eux has won many awards for his
contri-butions to neuroscience
ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTOR, which
con-sists of five subunits (left), was the first
neurotransmitter receptor to be isolated.Later work showed it to include not onlyneurotransmitter binding sites but also
an ion-transporting channel (right) ( The
beta and delta subunits and part of onealpha subunit have been cut away forclarity.) The channel is closed when thereceptor is at rest, but it opens rapidlywhen the two alpha subunits both com-bine with acetylcholine
Trang 33that attachment of some substance to
a docking site on an enzyme could
prop-agate a conformational change
through-out the enzyme, thereby rendering a
dis-tant site able to act on a substrate (the
substance transformed by an enzyme)
In my dissertation I noted brießy that
receptors for neurotransmitters might
function similarly They might contain
both a neurotransmitter binding site
and a separate region that forms an ion
channel Attachment of the
neurotrans-mitter to the binding site could elicit a
conformational change in the molecule
that would culminate in the opening of
its channel component To evaluate the
merit of this idea, my co-workers and I
had to analyze the composition of some
kind of receptor in detail For this, we
needed a good supply Unfortunately,
no receptor had yet been isolated, and
so that task became our mission
Our choice of receptor was inspired
by discoveries made by David
Nachman-sohn after he ßed Nazi Germany In the
late 1930s, while at the University of
ParisÐSorbonne, Nachmansohn and his
colleagues showed that acetylcholine
not only induces muscle to contract, it
also causes electricity-generating organs
of electric Þsh to produce current
Fur-thermore, the organs oÝer two lar advantages for researchers The con-stituent cells, called electrocytes, arehuge and thus relatively easy to handle
particu-Additionally, they number in the billions,which means electric organs harbor anabundance of acetylcholine receptormolecules
With these advantages in mind,
we decided to isolate the tylcholine receptor in the elec-
ace-tric organ of the elecace-tric eel
(Electropho-rus electricus) First, we had to break up
the electrocytes in the organ to createpreparations that could be analyzedchemically Michiki Kasai, now at OsakaUniversity, and I therefore ground upelectric tissue Then we separated outmicron-sized fragments of membranesfrom the innervated regions of electro-cytes LangleyÕs studies of muscle tis-sue suggested we would Þnd a highconcentration of the receptor in the in-nervated areas These membrane frag-ments have a wonderfully useful prop-erty: they close up into microsacs, ortiny vesicles, that can be Þlled with ra-dioactively labeled sodium (Na+) andpotassium (K+) ions
As would be expected if functional
copies of the receptor were present inthese microsacs, addition of acetylcho-line to a suspension of the vesicles dra-matically altered the ßow of ions intoand out of the vesiclesÑjust as occurs
in intact electrocytes when they respond
to acetylcholine Moreover, in agreementwith early suggestions of an allostericmechanism, no additional energy sup-ply was required for the reaction to takeplace Hence, we felt reasonably surethat the receptor was present and func-tional in the microsac membranes.Still, we needed some way to distin-guish the receptor from the rest of thematerial in the membranes At that time,the only way to pinpoint a molecularspecies on a membrane was to radio-actively label a substance that homed
to it and bound tightly We were havingdiÛculty Þnding a suitable homing ma-terial when Chen-Yuan Lee of the Na-tional Taiwan University came to ourrescue
Lee happened to visit my
laborato-ry in the spring of 1970 to present hisresearch on the structure and action
of snake venom The bites of several
snakes, such as the banded krait
(Bun-garus multicinctus) and the cobra, are
fatal because their venom contains
BINDING SITE
CELL
POTASSIUM ION
ION CHANNEL
Trang 34ic molecules that, like curare, block
sig-nal transmission by motor neurons
Among these molecules are alpha
tox-ins Lee reported that even at low
con-centrations, alpha-bungarotoxin from
the banded krait almost irreversibly
blocks the eÝects of acetylcholine on
the muscles of evolutionarily advanced
vertebrates I realized then that
alpha-bungarotoxin might provide the
speci-Þcity we needed for identifying the
ace-tylcholine receptor on the microsacs
we derived from the electric eel To our
delight, toxin supplied by Lee did our
bidding perfectly
We could Þnally take up the
task of purifying the receptor,
which we soon found was a
protein By 1974 our group and several
others had succeeded My team reached
this goal by applying a technique called
aÛnity chromatography We created
in-soluble beads to which arms that
end-ed in a structural analogue of curare
had been attached Then we doused
the beads with microsac membranes
that had been dissolved in a detergent
solution to separate the constituent
molecules The free receptor molecules
bound to the analogue, and the rest of
the solution ßoated away Next we
poured copies of the curare analogue
over the beads Now the receptor
mole-cules bound preferentially to the added
analogue and came oÝ the beads By
passing the resulting complexes of
re-ceptor and analogue through a
mem-brane permeable only to the curare
sub-stitute, we eliminated the analogue andacquired a pure supply of the receptor
Eager to learn something about thestructure of our prize, we presentedJean Cartaud of the Jacques Monod In-stitute in Paris with samples to view in
an electron microscope He found thatwhen observed from above, the recep-tor resembled a rosette with a depres-sion in the center Other analyses, by Ar-thur Karlin of the Columbia UniversityCollege of Physicians and Surgeons and
by Michael Raftery of the California stitute of Technology, revealed that theoverall molecule is composed of Þveprotein chains, or subunits: two alphachains, which have an identical molecu-lar weight, and three chains called beta,gamma and delta, which vary in molec-ular weight Moreover, Karlin demon-strated that the alpha subunits bear theprimary responsibility for recognizingacetylcholine (Today it is clear that thebinding site on each of the two alphasubunits must be occupied in order forthe ion channel to open.)
In-These results intrigued us They gested that each subunit might formone ỊpetalĨ of the rosette and that thecentral depression might reßect the ex-tracellular entryway to a membrane-spanning ion channel We needed moredata in order to test that idea, but inthe interim we had to cope with anoth-
sug-er nagging problem Could we be surethat receptor molecules contained anion channel, not solely the site thatbound acetylcholine?
In 1974 my co-worker Gerald L
Ha-zelbauer and I tackled this question byincorporating proteins from puriÞedextracts of microsacs into lipid mem-branes that enclosed radioactively la-beled sodium or potassium ions Aswould be predicted if the channel werepresent, binding by acetylcholine trig-gered the ßow of ions, and binding byalpha-bungarotoxin and curare blockedchanges in ionic ßux Later we con-Þrmed the results with puriÞed recep-tors themselves Hence, by 1980 weand other groups had clearly shownthat the pure protein does indeed con-tain all the structural elements neededfor the chemical transmission of anelectrical signalĐnamely, an acetylcho-line binding site, an ion channel and amechanism for coupling their activity
To attack the deeper problem of howthe acetylcholine receptor worked, wehad to decipher the sequence of its con-stituent amino acid Such informationprovides clues to the shape adoptedwhen a protein, which is little more than
a string of amino acids, folds in on self And knowledge of the folded struc-ture oÝers clues to the functions of thevarious domains in that structure.Introduction of automated sequenc-ing and genetic engineering techniques
it-in the late 1970s facilitated this eÝort
In 1979 my colleague Anne ThiŽry, Donny Strosberg of the JacquesMonod Institute and I elucidated thesequence of the Þrst 20 amino acids atone end (called the amino terminal ) ofthe alpha subunit in the acetylcholinereceptor of the European, or marbled,
Devillers-electric ray (Torpedo marmorata)
Sub-sequently, Raftery and Leroy E Hoodand their colleagues at Caltech identi-Þed essentially the same sequence in
the Californian electric ray (T
californi-ca) and went further When they
char-acterized the 54 amino acids abuttingthe amino terminal of the alpha, beta,gamma and delta subunits, they unex-pectedly found striking similarity: 35 to
50 percent of the sequence was cal, or homologous, in all four subunits.Molecular biologists interpret suchidentity to mean that the genes specify-ing the amino acid sequences of thesubunits are descendants of some an-cestral gene that duplicated twice (andunderwent subsequent alteration) inthe course of evolution The homologyfurther implied that the complete sub-units were similar to one another andtherefore probably did arrange them-selves quasisymmetrically around acentral axis, forming the petals on therosette seen in the electron microscope
identi-By 1983 more complete informationhad emerged Shosaku Numa and histeam at Kyoto University had solvedthe full sequences of the alpha and then
ELECTRIC RAY from the Torpedo genus harbors an electricity-generating organ
that contains billions of copies of an acetylcholine receptor Identification of the
re-ceptorÕs amino acid sequence led to the discovery that acetylcholine receptors in
the muscle and brain of humans are structurally similar to the Torpedo receptor.
Trang 35SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN November 1993 60A
Major structural features of the
ace-tylcholine receptor have begun to
yield to scrutiny Its five subunits (inset
in top panel ), which can be depicted
schematically as cylinders (top, center ),
are each formed from a protein that has
folded in on itself (detail at top right ).
Every subunit includes a large
hydro-philic (water-loving) region abutting the
amino (NH2) terminal, as well as four
hydrophobic (water-hating)
membrane-spanning segments: M1, M2, M3 and
M4 The neurotransmitter binding sites,
viewed from above in the middle panel
(inset), consist primarily of amino acids
(yellow spheres in detail ) residing in the
large hydrophilic region of the alpha
subunits (Letters in the spheres
repre-sent specific amino acids.) Neighboring
subunits contribute as well (pink sphere).
The ion channel is composed of five M2
segments (inset in bottom panel ) and
contains several rings of amino acids that
affect the functioning of the receptor
Among these, three negatively charged
rings (blue in detail showing two M2
segments in a specific acetylcholine
re-ceptor ) draw positively charged ions
(not shown ) through the channel An
un-charged, leucine ring (green ) at the
cen-ter, where M2 segments probably bend,
participates in closing the ion channel
when the receptor becomes
desensi-tized to acetylcholine The electron
den-sity map (bottom left ), showing a slice
through the receptor, indicates the
prob-able orientation of two M2 segments
(dark bars ) Nigel Unwin of the Medical
Research Council in Cambridge,
En-gland, supplied that image
Anatomy of the Acetylcholine Receptor
M2
ATTACHED PROTEIN MEMBRANE
Y
Y
A
V V
V V
F F
E
S S
A E E
– –
–
– –
–
– –
– –
– –
–
– E
L L
L
L L
L L
L L
C C YY
δ δ
β β
α
α
δ γ
M2
M2
M4
M4 COOH
Copyright 1993 Scientific American, Inc.
Trang 36the beta, gamma and delta subunits of
the T californica receptor Three other
laboratories, including mine, had also
identiÞed the sequence of the T
cali-fornica gamma subunit and supplied
that of the T marmorata alpha subunit.
Then Numa published the sequences of
all the subunits in the acetylcholine
re-ceptor on human muscle The muscle
receptor turned out to differ little from
those of electrocytes
These studies put workers in an
excellent position to ascertain
something about the architecture
of the folded subunits and how they
might Þt together In trying to predict
the structure of a folded protein,
scien-tists often scan the linear amino acid
sequence for stretches that are rich in
either hydrophilic or hydrophobic
ami-no acids Hydrophilic substances are
attracted to water, such as that in
cyto-plasm or in the ßuids that bathe cells;
hydrophobic, or water-hating,
substanc-es prefer to associate with other
hy-drophobic entities, such as the lipids
that form cell membranes
Every subunit that had been
se-quenced began at the amino-terminal
side with a large hydrophilic region
and housed four separate hydrophobic
segments of about 20 amino acids The
hydrophobic areas are referred to,
be-ginning with the one closest to the
lengthy hydrophilic domain, as M1, M2,
M3 and M4 This arrangement
suggest-ed that every subunit chain snaksuggest-ed
through the thickness of the cell
mem-brane four times, so that all four of the
hydrophobic regions spanned the
mem-brane [see box on preceding page].
In one model, at least, the large
hy-drophilic domain protruded into the
extracellular space So situated, that
domain on the alpha subunits (the
sub-units primarily responsible for
grasp-ing acetylcholine) would be well
posi-tioned to serve as a neurotransmitter
binding site It further seemed
reason-able to guess that one
membrane-span-ning segment from each of the Þve
sub-units associated with its counterparts
in the other subunits to form the ion
channel The like segments could form
such a channel if together they
encir-cled the central axis of the rosette
Later research conÞrmed this
scenar-io and added important details More
immediately, though, the sequencing of
the subunit proteins enabled
research-ers to dispel confusion over the
opera-tion of acetylcholine receptors in the
brain The trouble derived from the
re-sponse of certain of these receptors to
snake venoms
By the early 1980s investigators knew
that nicotine-sensitive, or nicotinic,
ace-tylcholine receptors were present in thebrain of higher vertebrates Neurobiol-ogists were puzzled, however, when al-pha-bungarotoxin seemed to block thefunctioning of certain of the receptors
but not others What is more, a
Bungar-us toxin called neuronal bungarotoxin
apparently attached to some cerebralreceptors but, again, not to others (Thepicture is actually more complicated
The brain additionally includes a class
of acetylcholine receptors named carinic receptors that I shall not discusshere Those receptors are very diÝerentfrom the nicotinic types They areformed from a single protein chain and
mus-do not include an ion channel They ert their eÝects through such intracel-lular mediators as G proteins.)
ex-The smoke cleared when James
W Patrick and Stephen F mann and their colleagues at theSalk Institute for Biological Studies inSan Diego and Marc Ballivet of the Uni-versity of Geneva used their knowledge
Heine-of the structure Heine-of electrocyte and cle subunits to decipher the amino acidsequences of cerebral subunits The investigators guessed that the aminoacid sequences of the cerebral subunitsprobably resembled those of electro-cytes and muscle even though certaincerebral receptors behaved somewhatdiÝerently from their counterparts inelectrocytes and muscle If the proteinswere similar, then the genes specifyingtheir amino acid sequences would besimilar as well That being the case, aprocess called DNA hybridization could
mus-be expected to help isolate the cerebralsubunit genes and thereby uncover theamino acid sequences of the corre-sponding subunits
DNA hybridization techniques italize on a prominent characteristic
cap-of genes Genes consist cap-of two strands
of nucleotides (the building blocks ofDNA) One strand from a gene will read-ily combine, or hybridize, with the oth-
er strand from the same or a closely lated gene Aware of this propensity,the investigators hoped they could re-trieve the cerebral subunit genes from
re-a lre-arger pool of brre-ain-derived DNA byÒÞshingÓ for them with ÒhooksÓ made
of nucleotide sequences that actuallydirect the synthesis of electrocyte ormuscle subunits The procedure workedbeautifully Seven alpha-subunit types(each of which is numbered) were found
to be produced in the brains of brates, including humans Three nonal-pha types, often classiÞed as beta sub-units, were discovered as well This di-versity suggested that the variable re-sponses of cerebral receptors to snakevenoms derive from slight diÝerences
verte-in the amverte-ino acid sequences of one ormore subunits
Subsequent studies have
demonstrat-ed that the protein products of most ofthe subunit genes identiÞed to date canyield functional receptors in living cells
if the cells make at least one alpha andone nonalpha variant The experimentsyielding this conclusion often involvedinjecting the genes into the nucleus ofoocytes, or immature eggs, from the
frog Xenopus In response, the
protein-making machinery of the oocytes scribed the genes into messenger RNAand, after transporting the RNA to thecytoplasm, translated it into the speci-Þed proteins Then the proteins associ-ated with one another in groups of Þve
tran-to produce receptran-tors
Evaluations of many receptors
pro-duced by Xenopus oocytes also
demon-strated that substitution of one unit variant for another in a receptorcan indeed change some properties ofthe receptor As an example, neuronalbungarotoxin blocks the response toacetylcholine receptors composed ofbeta-2 and either alpha-3 or alpha-4subunits, but the toxin does not inter-fere with the activity of molecules com-posed of beta-2 and alpha-2 subunits
sub-At about the same time as the
het-erogeneity of nicotinic line receptors was emerging, re-searchers were busy attempting to de-cipher the structure and operation ofreceptors for other neurotransmitters.When that work began, few would haveguessed that the receptors for gamma-aminobutyric acid ( GABA ) and glycinewould have much in common with ace-tylcholine receptors After all, nicotinicacetylcholine receptors excite cells byopening a channel permeable to cations(positively charged ions) Receptors forGABA and glycine, in contrast, facili-tate transport of chloride anions ( ClÐ);the ßow of chloride anions into cellsinhibits generation of electrical impuls-
acetylcho-es and can thereby counteract the fects of excitatory receptors
ef-Nevertheless, studies conducted inthe 1980s revealed that glycine andGABA receptors consist of multiple sub-units That in itself was not remark-able More strikingly, however, HeinrichBetz of the University of Heidelbergand Eric A Barnard of the Medical Re-search Council in Cambridge, England,respectively determined the completesequences of the glycine and GABA re-ceptors and found that the distribution
of hydrophilic and hydrophobic mains strongly resembled that of nico-tinic acetylcholine receptors
do-In other words, it began to seem
like-ly that the subunits in the GABA and
Trang 37glycine receptors, in common with
those of nicotinic acetylcholine
recep-tors, weave through the cell membrane
four times Evidence also indicated that
the complete receptors for GABA and
glycine carry both a neurotransmitter
binding site and an ion channel More
recent work suggests that some
sero-tonin receptors have a similar
architec-ture as well These receptors, like
ace-tylcholine receptors, control the
cross-membrane transport of cations and are
thus excitatory
The architectural similarities among
the receptors explain why
neurobiolo-gists now consider acetylcholine, GABA,
glycine and serotonin receptors to
con-stitute the superfamily of genetically
and structurally related
neurotransmit-ter-gated ion channels ( Receptors for
the prevalent neurotransmitter
gluta-mate may be distantly related They
in-clude a neurotransmitter binding site
and an ion channel but differ in
struc-ture.) There is also evidence that
neu-rotransmitter-gated ion channels are
allosteric proteins As would be
expect-ed for allosteric molecules, the
estimat-ed distance between the
neurotransmit-ter binding site and the ion channel is
largeĐabout 30 angstroms
As was found for acetylcholine
recep-tors, the subunits of other members of
the superfamily come in multiple
vari-eties Hence, a GABA receptor in one
part of the brain might well have
some-what diÝerent properties than does a
variant elsewhere in that organ For
in-stance, benzodiazepines, which are so
abundantly consumed as tranquilizers
by industrialized populations, ate the inhibitory action of only certainGABA receptor species They do so bybinding to a site that is distinct fromthe GABA binding site
potenti-As the precise inßuence on behavior
of every subspecies of every subunit inneurotransmitter-gated ion channels isdeciphered, pharmacologists should beable to design drugs that will selectivelyimpede or enhance those eÝects Suchagents, in turn, might help ameliorateany number of debilitating conditions,including mood disorders, tissue dam-age associated with stroke and, perhaps,AlzheimerÕs disease
Of course, to devise such drugs,
researchers require a rather fullunderstanding of receptor struc-ture They need to know the speciÞcamino acids responsible for bindingneurotransmitters, for directing the ßow
of ions in and out of cells and for wise modulating receptor function Oneuseful way to gather such information
other-is known as aÛnity labeling Sometraceable version of a molecule that in-teracts with a receptor is allowed to bindirreversibly to that target; the boundsubstance thus highlights the aminoacids that constitute the binding site
Between 1988 and 1990, my leagues Michael Dennis, JŽr™me Girau-dat, Jean-Luc Galzi and I uncoveredmuch of the acetylcholine binding site
col-by identifying amino acids in a Torpedo
receptor that were labeled by the
com-pound pÐ(N,NÐ dimethyl)
aminoben-zenediazonium ßuoroborate, also called
DDF We learned that several aromaticamino acids (those carrying ring-shapedside chains) are critical to DDF binding,and we conÞrmed binding by a pair of
cysteine amino acids identiÞed in a
Tor-pedo receptor by Karlin The labeled
ami-no acids are distributed within threedistinct regions of the large hydrophil-
ic domain of the amino-terminal region
It became evident that they collectivelyform a kind of negatively charged cup
in which the positively charged part ofacetylcholine could lodge
What is even more exciting, we went
on to show that these amino acids tually do play a critical role in receptorfunction With Daniel Bertrand of theUniversity of Geneva Medical Center, weproved this point in a receptor that con-sists entirely of alpha-7 subunits fromthe chicken brain (This receptor is oneexception to the rule requiring the pres-ence of both alpha and beta subunitsfor receptor formation.) SpeciÞc muta-tion, by what is called site-directed mu-tagenesis, of the amino acids that DDF
ac-labeled in the Torpedo receptor
strik-ingly impeded the alpha-7 receptorÕsresponse to acetylcholine
Taken together, the aÛnity-labelingand mutagenesis studies conÞrm thatthe large hydrophilic region of the al-pha subunit is exposed to the extracel-lular environment There it sits, ready
to receive acetylcholine released fromnerve endings and to trigger the open-ing of the ion-transporting channel.Ảnity labeling also delineated the
structure of the ion channel in a
Torpe-do receptor DiÛcult analyses convinced
us by the end of 1985 that the drugchlorpromazine attaches to amino acids
on the membrane-crossing, M2 phobic segment of at least one sub-unitĐthe delta chain This work, and asimilar report by Ferdinand Hucho andhis co-workers at Berlin University, sug-gested that the channelÕs inner wall isformed by Þve M2 segments, one con-tributed by every subunit
hydro-Numa and Bert Sakmann, then at theMax Planck Institute for BiophysicalChemistry in Gšttingen, conÞrmed thispossibility By site-directed mutagene-sis, they determined that at least threerings of negatively charged amino acids(especially glutamate) participate intransporting ions through the channel.Each ring lies in a plane parallel to thesurface of the cell and consists of Þveamino acids, one supplied by the M2segment of every subunit A single ringresides at the extracellular surface ofthe membrane (at the top of the chan-nel) A second, termed the intermediatering, lies at the bottom of the channel,and the third ring lies directly belowthe second, in the cytoplasm proper.60F SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN November 1993
UNFOLDED PROTEIN CHAINS (multicolored bars) that constitute subunits in
re-ceptors for acetylcholine, GABA and glycine have much in common All harbor a
large, extracellular hydrophilic domain, a smaller, cytoplasmic hydrophilic domain
and four hydrophobic segments (M1, M2, M3 and M4) believed to span the cell
membrane These similarities suggest that the molecules all belong to one
super-family of structurally related neurotransmitter receptors
CYTOPLASMIC HYDROPHILIC DOMAIN
FROM GLYCINE RECEPTOR
Copyright 1993 Scientific American, Inc.
Trang 38Given that the distribution of
hy-drophobic subunits in the GABA,
gly-cine and serotonin receptors matches
that of acetylcholine receptors, we
won-dered if their M2 segments formed the
channel in those receptors as well They
do, even though those receptors
trans-port negatively, rather than positively,
charged ions The diÝerence in charge
preference apparently stems from
vari-ance in just a few amino acids When
BertrandÕs team and mine transferred
into the alpha-7 receptor three M2
ami-no acids from a GABA receptor
(includ-ing the one giv(includ-ing rise to the
intermedi-ate ring), those few changes converted
the alpha-7 receptor channel from a
cationic to an anionic transporter
Whether a receptor carries an
anion- or cation-transporting
channel, its main function is
to open that channel in response to
sig-nals from a neurotransmitter Yet
neu-rotransmitter receptors have another
fascinating skill as well By altering
their conformation, they can
apparent-ly increase or decrease their readiness
to respond to neurotransmitters In that
way, they can regulate the pool of
re-ceptors available to respond to
exter-nal sigexter-nals and can thus inßuence the
eÛciency of signal transmission
My associates and I realized that
re-ceptors could possess this regulatory
power when we began to consider a
phenomenon noted by several
investi-gators over the years Receptors react
diÝerently to discrete pulses of
high-ly concentrated acetylcholine (such as
those usually delivered by neurons)
than they do to the continuous
avail-ability of lower concentrations (such
as is provided in many experiments)
Excited neurons secrete large
concen-trations of acetylcholine in discrete
bursts at synapses, the specialized
junc-tions now known to connect neurons
The molecules freed during a single
pulse pour into the synaptic cleft (the
space separating communicating cells)
Many of them make their way from the
excited, presynaptic cell to receptors on
the surface of a postsynaptic cell Under
normal circumstances, the aÛnity of
most receptor molecules for the
neuro-transmitter is low Consequently,
imme-diately after acetylcholine binds to
re-ceptors and causes the channel to open,
the receptors release their hold on the
neurotransmitter, which is promptly
degraded Within milliseconds of being
bound, the receptors revert to their
closed, unbound state and are ready to
react once again
In contrast, when acetylcholine is
sup-plied continuously to receptors, the
receptor molecules begin to lose their
responsiveness After initially openingthe ion channel, they slowly take on aỊdesensitizedĨ conformation over thecourse of seconds or minutes That is,they bind avidly to acetylcholine butmaintain a closed channel and do nottransport ions Even small concentra-tions of acetylcholine will be held bythese closed-channel receptors for rela-tively long periods, during which thereceptors cannot react to new signals
So it seems that acetylcholine tors can adopt at least three intercon-vertible states that can diÝer in theiraÛnity for the neurotransmitter and
recep-in the eÛciency of signal transmission
In addition to the high-aÛnity, sitized state, in which the channel re-mains closed, there is a low-aÛnity,resting (but activable) state in whichthe channel is closed but easily opened
desen-if both alpha subunits are bound denly by acetylcholine The low-aÛni-
sud-ty, open-channel condition is the thirdstate All three states switch back andforth spontaneously but at diÝerentrates than occur when acetylcholine ispresent
Site-directed mutagenesis has helpedclarify the process by which desensi-tization occurs; it appears that leucineamino acids are involved In aÛnity-la-beling studies carried out by my group,chlorpromazine labeled a ring of un-charged leucine amino acids near thecenter of the ion channel When Ber-trandÕs team and mine replaced theleucines in this ring with a smaller un-charged amino acid, we created a recep-tor that resembled a normal desensi-tized receptor in that it bound tightly
to acetylcholine Yet its channel wasfixed in an open state This result im-plies that the leucine ring locks the ionchannel closed when the receptor is inthe desensitized conformation
My associates and I have long
pondered the beneÞts thatmight accrue to an organismfrom bearing receptors able to adoptmultiple states Of course, a desensiti-zation mechanism would protect recep-tor-bearing cells from becoming over-excited in response to dangerously highlevels of acetylcholine But I believe that
DYNAMIC NATURE of the acetylcholine receptor is evident in its ability to adopt
multiple conformations In the resting state (a), the receptor has low affinity for
acetylcholine, and its ion channel is closed If it is exposed briefly to a high centration of the neurotransmitter, it assumes the active, open-channel conforma-
con-tion for milliseconds (b) before releasing the acetylcholine and reverting to the
resting state If acetylcholine is supplied continuously, resting and activated
re-ceptors can slowly assume a desensitized state (c ) In this condition, the receptor
holds acetylcholine with high affinity for seconds or minutes, maintains a closedchannel and will not respond to new pulses of acetylcholine
ACETYLCHOLINE
CLOSED, RESTINGSTATE
c
OPEN, ACTIVESTATE
FASTTRANSITION
SLOWTRANSITION
CLOSED, DESENSITIZEDSTATE
Trang 39there is another explanation as well.
In 1982 my colleague Thierry
Heid-mann and I further proposed that the
ability of acetylcholine receptors to
alter their conformation slowly could
more routinely serve to increase or
de-crease the eÛciency of signal
transmis-sion at a synapse In so doing, such
re-ceptors could participate in learning
Many theorists, following the lead of
Donald O Hebb, postulate that
learn-ing depends on changes in the
eÛcien-cy of signal transmission across the
synapses linking two neurons that are
activated simultaneously
Our hypothesis is far from proved,
but it is plausible If the ability to adopt
many states were important to
regulat-ing signal transmission, this ßexibility
should appear in other
neurotransmit-ter receptors as well Research showsthat GABA, glycine and serotonin re-ceptors also are able to assume desen-sitized conformations
The demonstration of state changes
in other receptors is not the only port for the possibility that receptorsregulate synaptic eÛciency These mol-ecules sit in a particularly good posi-tion to control the degree of respon-siveness needed at any given moment
sup-Crossing the cell membrane as they do,they are exposed to chemical and elec-trical signals issued both from outsideand from within the cell If each ofthese signals pushed the receptor to-ward one conformation or another, theÞnal arrangement would reßect thesummed, or integrated, inßuence ofvarious, possibly contradictory, forces
Among the signals that impinge onreceptors are the intracellular concen-tration of calcium ions and changes inthe electrical potential across the cellmembrane Hyperpolarization of themembrane and elevation of the calci-
um concentration in muscle acceleratedesensitization of the acetylcholine re-ceptor Richard L Huganir and PaulGreengard of the Rockefeller Universityfurther established in 1986 that phos-phorylation of the receptor promotesdesensitization
If neurotransmitter receptors did infact control the eÛcacy of intercellularsignaling, we would anticipate that theywould be capable of increasing, notmerely decreasing, their sensitivity toneurotransmitters Such potentiationhas been observed Extracellular calci-
um enhances the stimulatory effect ofnicotinic acetylcholine receptors in thebrain, and glycine enhances the effect
of glutamate receptors
In general, then, we suspect that if areceptor is tottering between two con-formations, one of which is sensitiveand the other of which is refractory tostimulation, the balance can be shiftedtoward one of the two states by chemi-cal or electrical signals The resultingconformation, in turn, enhances or de-presses the ability of the receptor toconvey signals promptly
Clearly, our understanding of
chemical signaling in the brainhas advanced dramatically in thepast quarter century The decision toisolate the acetylcholine receptor from
a Þsh organ was risky: if the eÝortfailed or if that receptor was unrelated
to any others, we would have wastedtime and energy Fortunately, the gam-ble paid oÝ more than we could havehoped The acetylcholine receptor inelectric Þsh was identiÞed, and its se-quence was deciphered Then biotech-nology, especially recombinant DNAmethodology, enabled workers to char-acterize related receptors in humanmuscle and in the brain and to learnthat nicotinic acetylcholine receptorsare structurally related to, and form asuperfamily with, those responsive toGABA, glycine and serotonin
Meanwhile it became clear that thesubunits composing each type of recep-tor are themselves variable: a receptor
in one part of the brain may well sess properties that diÝer from those
pos-of their immediate kin elsewhere in rebral tissue This likelihood raises thetantalizing possibility that drugs tar-geted to speciÞc receptors on deÞnedcategories of neurons can be developedfor the highly selective treatment ofsignaling disorders in the brain
ce-62 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN November 1993
MANY FORCES can affect the conformation of a neurotransmitter receptor and
hence the efficiency with which it responds to signals received from a neuron
act-ing on it Aside from the concentration and delivery rate of the neurotransmitter
(a ), some influences include binding by additional neurotransmitters or other
ex-tracellular chemicals (b ), changes in the electrical potential across the cell
mem-brane (c ) and binding by intracellular signaling molecules (d ), such as ions.
NEURONAL MAN: THE BIOLOGY OF MIND
J P Changeux Translated by Laurence
Garey Pantheon Books, 1985
FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE AND
DYNAM-ICS OF THE NICOTINIC ACETYLCHOLINE
RECEPTOR: AN ALLOSTERIC
LIGAND-GAT-ED ION CHANNEL J P Changeux in
FIDIA Research Foundation Neuroscience
Award Lectures, Vol 4 Raven Press,
1990
EXPLORATIONS OF THE NICOTINIC
ACE-TYLCHOLINE RECEPTOR A Karlin in
Harvey Lectures: 1989Ð1990, Vol 85,
pages 71Ð107; 1991
THE FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE OF THEACETYLCHOLINE NICOTINIC RECEPTOR EX-PLORED BY AFFINITY LABELLING AND SITE-DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS J P Changeux,
J L Galzi, A Devillers-ThiŽry and D
Ber-trand in Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics,
Vol 25, No 4, pages 395Ð432; November1992
NICOTINIC ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTOR AT
9 A RESOLUTION N Unwin in Journal of
Molecular Biology, Vol 229, No 4, pages
NEUROTRANSMITTER
CHANGE
IN MEMBRANEPOTENTIAL
c
CELLMEMBRANE
INTRACELLULARSIGNALING MOLECULE
Copyright 1993 Scientific American, Inc.
Trang 40All the shimmering stars that pierce
the night sky shine because of
the same fundamental process:
nuclear fusion When two or more
atom-ic nuclei collide and fuse into one, they
release virtually unimaginable amounts
of energy The fusion of one gram of
hy-drogen, for example, liberates as much
energy as the combustion of 20,000
lit-ers of gasoline In stars such as the
sun, fusion reactions burn brilliantly
for billions of years They are not the
only source of stellar energy, however
In 1971 astronomers recognized a class
of bizarre, x-ray-emitting stars, known
as x-ray binaries, whose intense
emis-sions require an energy source far more
eÛcient than even fusion
Theorists have deduced that these
objects consist of a normal star
orbit-ing a collapsed stellar corpse, usually
a neutron star Neutron stars are so
dense that the entire mass of the star is
squeezed into what is essentially a
sin-gle atomic nucleus 20 kilometers across
The stars in these binaries lie so close
together that gas can ßow from the
nor-mal star to the neutron star That
cap-tured material forms a rapidly swirling
disk whose inner edge, just above the
neutron starÕs surface, races around at
nearly the speed of light Friction
with-in the disk eventually causes the gas to
fall inward, or accrete, onto the tron star In the process, violent colli-sions between particles heat the gas totemperatures of 10 million to 100 mil-lion kelvins Under such incredibly hotconditions, the gas emits torrents of en-ergetic x-rays Pound for pound, accre-tion unleashes 15 to 60 times as muchenergy as does hydrogen fusion
neu-Astronomers now recognize that cretion powers a rich diversity of astro-physical objects These range from in-fant stars to quasars, objects about thesize of the solar system that outshineentire galaxies, most likely as a result ofgas spiraling into a supermassive blackhole X-ray binaries serve as ideal show-cases for learning in detail how the ac-cretion process works They are brightand relatively nearby, residing well with-
ac-in our galaxy
The study of x-ray binaries also vides a glimpse into the life cycle ofsome of the most exotic and dynamicstellar systems in the sky In these stel-lar duos, one or both members spendssome time feeding oÝ its partner Thattransfer of material stunningly altersboth starsÕ development One star maypay for its gluttony by prematurely end-ing its life in a spectacular supernovaexplosion On the other hand, placid,
pro-elderly neutron stars may receive an fusion of rotational energy that causesthem to become a prominent source ofrapidly pulsed radio waves
in-Despite their prominence in the
x-ray sky, x-x-ray binaries escapedthe notice of researchers untilthe dawn of the space age in the 1960s.Celestial x-rays are absorbed high inthe upper atmosphere, precluding theirdetection from the ground The advent
of space technology opened up an tirely new Þeld of investigation by mak-ing it possible to loft telescopes abovethe obscuring layers of the earthÕs atmosphere
en-In 1962 Riccardo Giacconi, now thedirector of the European Southern Ob-servatory, and his associates at Ameri-can Science and Engineering in Cam-bridge, Mass., placed an x-ray detector
on board a rocket and discovered theÞrst known celestial x-ray source, Scor-pius X-1 The name indicates that it isthe brightest x-ray-emitting object inthe constellation Scorpius Scorpius X-1shines about 1,000 times brighter inx-rays than in visible light The identi-
ty of the object emitting this radiationwas a total mystery
In the following years, x-ray
detec-X-ray Binaries
In these systems, ultradense neutron stars feed on their more sedate companions Such stellar cannibalism produces brilliant outpourings
of x-rays and drastically alters the evolution of both stars
by Edward P J van den Heuvel and Jan van Paradijs
EDWARD P J VAN DEN HEUVEL and
JAN VAN PARADIJS have collaborated on
the study of celestial x-ray sources since
the late 1970s Van den Heuvel received
his Ph.D in mathematical and physical
science from the University of Utrecht
in 1968 In 1974 he joined the faculty of
the University of Amsterdam, where he is
now chairman of the astronomy
depart-ment He is also a co-founder and the
di-rector of the Center for High-Energy
As-trophysics, operated jointly by the
Uni-versity of Amsterdam and the UniUni-versity
of Utrecht Van Paradijs earned his Ph.D
in astronomy from the University of
Am-sterdam in 1975 He has been a professor
of astronomy at the university since 1988
X-RAY BINARIES comprise two very diÝerent classes of double-star systems Inboth cases, a neutron star lies at the heart of the x-ray source Most young x-ray bi-
naries, such as Centaurus X-3 (top right), contain a bright blue star having 10 to 40
times the mass of the sun The youthful neutron star emits pulses of x-rays as it
rotates (below, left) Low-mass x-ray binaries usually contain far older, sunlike stars.
In the tiny low-mass system 4U 1820Ð30 (bottom right), both stars must be
com-pact objects, presumably a neutron star and a larger but less massive white dwarf.Erratic bursts of x-rays occur when gas collects on the surface of an old neutron
star and undergoes a thermonuclear detonation (below, right).
X-RAY BURST(LOW-MASS X-RAY BINARY)
X-RAY PULSES(MASSIVE X-RAY BINARY)
TIME (SECONDS)TIME (SECONDS)
RELATIVE X-RAY INTENSITY