Petroleum Engineering 405 Drilling Engineering 1 Well Drilling Engineering Lifting Capacity of Drilling Fluids & Particle Slip Velocity Dr DO QUANG KHANH 2 Fluid Velocity in Annulus Particle Slip[.]
Trang 1Well Drilling Engineering
Lifting Capacity of Drilling Fluids
& Particle Slip Velocity
Dr DO QUANG KHANH
Trang 22
Fluid Velocity in Annulus
Particle Slip Velocity
Particle Reynolds Number
Friction Coefficient
Example
Iterative Solution Method
Alternative Solution Method
API RP 13D Method
Trang 3Read:
Applied Drilling Engineering, Ch 4
HW # ADE 4.55, 4.56
Trang 44
Lifting Capacity of Drilling Fluids
Historically, when an operator felt that
the hole was not being cleared of cuttings
at a satisfactory rate, he would:
Increase the circulation rate
Thicken the mud
(increase YP/PV)
Trang 5Lifting Capacity of Drilling Fluids
More recent analysis shows that:
Turbulent flow cleans the hole better
Pipe rotation aids cuttings removal
With water as drilling fluid, annular
velocities of 100-125 ft/min are generally adequate (vertical wells)
Trang 66
Lifting Capacity of Drilling Fluids
A relatively “flat” velocity
profile is better than a highly pointed one
Mud properties can be
modified to obtain a flatter profile in laminar flow
e.g., decrease n
Trang 7Drilled cuttings typically
have a density of about 21 lb/gal
Since the fluid density is
less than 21 lb/gal the cuttings will tend to settle, or ‘slip’ relative
to the drilling mud
VV
V
Trang 88
Velocity Profile
The slip velocity can be reduced by
modifying the mud properties such that the velocity profile is flattened:
Increase the ratio (YP/PV)
(yield point/plastic viscosity) or
Decrease the value of n
Trang 9Plug Flow
Plug Flow is good for hole
cleaning Plug flow refers
to a “completely” flat velocity profile
The shear rate is zero
where the velocity profile
is flat
Trang 1010
Participle Slip Velocity
Newtonian Fluids:
The terminal velocity of a small
spherical particle settling
(slipping) through a Newtonian
fluid under Laminar flow
conditions is given by STOKE’S
s s
d ) (
138 v
Trang 11Particle Slip Velocity - small particles
Where
cp viscosity,
fluid
in particle, of
diameter d
lbm/gal fluid,
of density
lbm/gal particle,
solid of
density
ft/s velocity,
slip v
s
f s s
= µ
=
= ρ
= ρ
s s
d ) (
138 v
Trang 1212
Particle Slip Velocity
Stokes’ Law gives acceptable accuracy for a particle Reynolds number < 0.1
For Nre > 0.1 an empirical friction factor
N
Trang 13What forces act
Trang 1414
Sphericities for Various Particle Shapes
Shape Sphericity
0.58
20r h
0.87
2r h
0.83
r h
0.59
r/3 h
0.25
r/15 h
Cylinders
0.73
3
* 2
*
0.77
2
*
*
Prism
0.81
Cube
0.85 Octahedron
1.00
particle
Trang 16Particle Reynolds Number, fig 4.46
) d 104
4 (
Eq
1 f
d 89 1
v
f
s s
Trang 17Slip Velocity Calculation using Moore’s graph (Fig 4.46)
1 Calculate the flow velocity
2 Determine the fluid n and K values
3 Calculate the appropriate viscosity
(apparent viscosity)
4 Assume a value for the slip velocity
5 Calculate the corresponding
Particle Reynolds number
Trang 1818
Slip Velocity Calculation (using Moore’s graph)
6 Obtain the corresponding drag coeff., f,
from the plot of f vs Nre
7 Calculate the slip velocity and compare
with the value assumed in step 4 above
8 If the two values are not close enough,
repeat steps 4 through 7 using the calculated Vs as the assumed slip velocity
in step 4
Trang 19Example
Use (the modified) Moore’s method to
calculate the slip velocity and the net particle velocity under the following assumptions:
Well depth: 8,000 ft Yield point: 4 lbf/100ft2
Drill pipe: 4.5”, 16.6 #/ft Density of Particle: 21 lbm/gal Mud Weight: 9.1 #/gal Particle diameter: 5,000 µm Plastic viscosity: 7 cp Circulation rate: 340 gal/min
Hole size: 7-7/8”
Trang 2020
Solution - Slip Velociy Problem
1 Calculate the flow velocity
2 Determine the fluid n and K values
11 7
4
300 300
τ
1811
7300
600 300
600
p =θ −θ ⇒ θ = µ +θ = + =
ft/sec 3.325
) 5 4 875
7 ( 448
2
340 )
d d
( 448
2
q v
1
2 2 _
Trang 21(18/11) log
3.32 log
32
θ
=
7101
0
n =
2 Determine the fluid n and K values - cont’d
Solution - Slip Velociy Problem - cont’d
cp
eq 94
66 K
511
11 )
510 (
511
) 510
Trang 2222
7101
0 7101
0 1 a
n n
1
_
1 2
a
0208
0
) 7101
0
1 2
( 325
3
5 4 875
7 144
94 66
(4.107) Eq.
0208
0
) n
1 2
( v
d d
144 K
−
−
3 Calculate the appropriate viscosity
Solution - Slip Velociy Problem - cont’d
94.66
7
94
K
cp cp
a
µ µ
Trang 23663
12
325
32
VV
_
4 Assume a value for the slip velocity
Solution - Slip Velociy Problem - cont’d
5 Calculate the corresponding Particle Reynolds No
17.94
cm 2.54
in m
10
cm m
5000 663)
928(9.1)(1
d v
928 N
4
a
s s f Re
μ ρ
[ ]
Trang 2424
From graph, f = 2.0
Solution - Slip Velociy Problem - cont’d
6 Obtain the drag coeff., f , from the plot of f vs Nre
1.663
ft/s 0.678
v
f
0.959
1 9.1
21.0 2.0
0.1969 1.89
(4.104d) Eq.
1 f
d 1.89
v
s
f
s s
Trang 25vs =
9 62 678
0
* 7 92
7 2
f =
etc
s / ft 58
0 7
2
959
0
Solution - Slip Velocity Problem - cont’d
Trang 26f
s s
_ Re
Re
d 82.87 v
; N
40 f
: 3 N
Trang 272 Intermediate;
; N
22
f
: 300 N
s
s s
_
)(
)(
d
2.90v
μρ
Trang 2828
3 Fully Turbulent:
f
f s
s s
Re
ρ
)ρ(ρ
d1.54
v
1.5;
f
:300N
Trang 29For the above calculations:
d) q.(4.104
E
1 f
d 1.89
v
d v
928 N
f
s
s s
a
s s f Re
μ ρ
Slip Velocity - Alternate Method
NOTE: Check NRe
Trang 3030
Slip Velocity - Alternate Method_2
If the flow is fully laminar, cuttings transport is not likely to be a problem
Trang 31(i) Intermediate:
ft/sec 545
.
0 17.94)
* (9.1
9.1) (21
* 0.1969
*
2.90 v
) (
) (
2.90d v
1/3 2/3 s _ 1/3 a f 2/3 f s s s _ = − = − = μ ρ ρ ρ (ii) Fully Turbulent: ft/sec 0.781 9.1) (21 0.1969 1.54 v ρ ) ρ ( ρ d 1.54 v
_
f
f s
s s
_
=
−
=
−
=
Example
Trang 3232
Example - cont’d
Intermediate: Vs = 0.545 ft/sec
Fully Turbulent: Vs = 0.781 ft/sec
The correct slip velocity is 0.545 ft/sec
{ agrees reasonably well with iterative method on p.12 }
51 94 17 1969 0 * 545 0 * 1 9 * 928 N :
Range OK
Trang 33Slip Velocity - API RP 13D
Iterative Procedure
Calculate Fluid Properties, n & K
Calculate Shear Rate
Calculate Apparent Viscosity
Calculate Slip Velocity
Example
Trang 35Calculation Procedure
1 Calculate n s for the settling particle
2 Calculate K s for the particle
3 Assume a value for the slip velocity, V s
4 Calculate the shear rate, γs
5 Calculate the corresponding apparent viscosity, µes
6 Calculate the slip velocity, V s
7 Use this value of V s and repeat steps 4-6 until the
assumed and calculated slip velocities ~“agree”
Trang 37Slip Velocity - Example
1 Calculate ns for the settling particle
2 Calculate Ks for the particle
2
n 5413
0 S
cm
sec
dyne 336
.
6 2
170
20
* 11
5
5413
0 3
20 log
657
R
R log
657
2 170
R 11 5
Trang 3838
Slip Velocity - Example
3 Assume a value for the slip velocity, Vs
Assume Vs = 1 ft/sec
4 Calculate the shear rate, γs
p
S S
D
V 12
=
5 0
Trang 39Slip Velocity - Example
5 Calculate the corresp apparent viscosity:
6 Calculate the slip velocity, Vs
1 n s s
.14724
*336
ρ +
D e
790 ,
920 (
1 D
e 0002403
.
0
V
2 p
p p
03 5 es
03 5 s
Trang 4040
Slip Velocity - Example
6 Calculate the slip velocity, Vs
ρ +
0 V
2
es
p p
p p
es s
5 12
* 5 0 1 5 12
5 22 5
0
* 465 ,
16
1 5
12
* 5 0
48 147 01344
.
0
V
2 s
Trang 41Slip Velocity - Example
V s = 0.8078 ft/sec
4 Shear rate: γs = 19.386 sec -1
5 Apparent viscosity: µes = 162.65 cp
6 Slip velocity: V s = 0.7854 ft/sec
Second Iteration - using
4 Shear rate: γs = 18.849 sec -1
5 Apparent viscosity: µes = 164.75 cp
Third Iteration - using V s = 0.7854 ft/sec
Trang 426 Slip velocity: V s = 0.7819 ft/sec
Fourth Iteration - using
Slip Velocity, V s = 0.7819 ft/sec
{ V s = 1.0, 0.808, 0.782, 0.782 ft/sec }
Trang 43Transport Ratio
? Efficiency
Transport
ft/min 120
velocity
Fluid
ft/min 90
velocity
Particle
: Example
100%
* velocity
fluid
velocity
particle Efficiency
Transport
velocity fluid
velocity
particle
Ratio Transport
Trang 4444
Transport Ratio
%75
%100
*)120/
90(
=
=
efficiency Transport
A transport efficiency of 50% or higher is desirable!
Note: Net particle velocity = fluid velocity - slip velocity
In example, particle slip velocity = 120 - 90 = 30 ft/min
With a fluid velocity of 120 ft/min a minimum particle
velocity of 60 ft/min is required to attain a transport
efficiency of 50%
Trang 45Potential Hole-Cleaning Problems
1 Hole is enlarged This may result in
reduced fluid velocity which is lower than the slip velocity
2 High downhole temperatures may
adversely affect mud properties downhole
[ We measured these at the surface.]
Trang 4646
Potential Hole-Cleaning Problems
3 Lost circulation problems may preclude
using thick mud or high circulating
velocity Thick slugs may be the
answer
4 Slow rate of mud thickening - after it has
been sheared (and thinned) through the
bit nozzles, where the shear rate is very
high
Trang 47The End