Surgical strategy for giant pituitary adenoma based on evaluation of fine feeding system and angioarchitecture Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery Advanced Techniques and Case Management 8 (2017) 1–3 Conte[.]
Trang 1Case report
feeding system and angioarchitecture
Yoshikazu Ogawa, M.D., Ph.D.a,⁎ , Kenichi Sato, M.D., Ph.D.b, Teiji Tominaga, M.D., Ph.D.c
a
Department of Neurosurgery, Kohnan Hospital, 4-20-1 Nagamachiminami, Taihaku-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 982-8523, Japan
b Department of Neuroendovascular Treatment, Kohnan Hospital, 4-20-1 Nagamachiminami, Taihaku-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 982-8523, Japan
c
Department of Neurosurgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8574, Japan
a b s t r a c t
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 9 December 2016
Accepted 1 January 2017
Available online xxxx
Background: Giant pituitary adenomas continue to carry higher surgical risks, and postoperative acute cata-strophic hemodynamic changes are associated with very poor outcome but remain difficult to predict Method: Surgical planning based on information about thefine angioarchitecture was achieved using C-arm cone-beam computed tomography Particular feeding systems and semi-quantitative evaluations for tumor staining were also investigated
Conclusion: Major blood supply was different from the normal supply to the anterior pituitary gland and did not necessarily correspond to tumor shape and extension Surgical strategy should be established based on the tumor feeding systems and hemodynamics in giant pituitary adenomas
© 2017 The Authors Published by Elsevier B.V This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Keywords:
Angioarchitecture
Feeding artery
Giant pituitary adenoma
Surgical strategy
1 Introduction
Modern imaging studies can identify adverse surgical factors
such as cavernous sinus invasion, encasement of major intracranial
vessels, and extensive destruction of the skull base, which are all
known to occur with giant pituitary adenomas However,
postoper-ative acute catastrophic changes without major vessel disturbance
are associated with very poor outcome but remain difficult to
pre-dict Retrospective analysis of a single center experience found
acute hemodynamic changes after surgery in 13 of 177 cases of
giant pituitary adenoma, resulting in 12 deaths[1] The probable
mechanisms of these changes include intratumoral primary
hemor-rhage, acute ischemia and resultant necrosis in the secondary
hem-orrhagic tissues, and increased intratumoral pressure resulting in
continuous hemorrhage[2,3] These mechanisms are associated
with injuries to the minute intratumoral feeders and/or drainers,
which frequently have diameters ofb300 μm, and the resultant
drastic changes in the hemodynamics We describe a case of
surgi-cal planning based on information about thefine angioarchitecture
and feeding systems, and semi-quantitative evaluations for tumor
staining using angiography specially modified for giant pituitary
adenomas
2 Case report
A 65-year-old man was referred to our hospital MR imaging disclosed a huge skull base tumor, consisting of two major compart-ments with a narrow connecting portion at the planum sphenoidale The anterior part of the tumor extended into the interhemispheric fis-sure and the left frontal lobe was significantly compressed upwards The postero-inferior part of the tumor had occupied the enlarged sella turcica with destruction from the sellarfloor to the upper part of the clivus, and protruded to the sphenoidal sinus (Fig 1a, b) After the intro-duction of general anesthesia, the angioarchitecture of the tumors was evaluated with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) using a C-arm cone-beam CT scanner with aflat-panel detector (GE Healthcare, Buc, France) and 50%-diluted contrast medium The three-dimensional vol-ume rendered images and CT-like reconstructions in the sagittal, coro-nal, and axial planes were developed with an Advantage Workstation 4.6 (GE Healthcare) Cone-beam CT angiography identified two inde-pendent feeding systems, from the branches of the left anterior cerebral artery to the anterior part, and arteriovenous shunt-like fastflow from the left meningohypophyseal trunk to the posterior part of the tumor (Fig 1c, d)
2.1 Tumor stain measurement Angiographical image sequence data were processed with Image J (NIH, Bethesda, MD) to measure optical density as the contrast medium passed through the tumor Because tumor staining is regarded as
⁎ Corresponding author.
E-mail address: yogawa@kohnan-sendai.or.jp (Y Ogawa).
Contents lists available atScienceDirect
Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and
Case Management
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e :w w w i n a t - j o u r n a l c o m
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.inat.2017.01.002
Trang 2contrast retention in the late phase of angiography, so we measured
dif-ferences in the optical density between the beginning of a run and a
pla-teau of the late phase in the time-density curve[4]
2.2 Tumor removal
Multi-stepped removals were thought to be possible, consisting of
initial surgery using the interhemispheric approach to the anterior
part, followed by removal using the extended transsphenoidal approach
of the infero-posterior part of the tumor Basic strategy was planned as
initial removal and coagulation of the tumor from the side of the main
feeding systems with greater optical density difference, and extending
gradually to the other side The tumor was subtotally (99.4%) removed
except for small remnants in the right cavernous portion (Fig 2) He
was discharged without neurological or endocrinological deficits
3 Discussion
Giant pituitary adenomas are extremely difficult to remove totally,
with the risk of postoperative pituitary apoplexy from the residual
tumors[1–3] The hemodynamics and feeding system of pituitary
adenomas are little understood, partly because these feeding arteries
generally have diameters ofb300 μm and are arranged in mesh-like pat-terns as shown in our case, so are extremely difficult to identify intraop-eratively even with careful exploration DSA cannot easily visualize such fine angioarchitecture Moreover, the present trend to reduction of in-vasiveness of medical procedures may restrain preoperative examina-tion, so only verification of major vessels with MR angiography or CT angiography is performed
The main feeding artery to the anterior lobe is the superior hypophy-seal artery based on accurate anatomical research[5] However, blood supply from the superior hypophyseal artery was barely present in our case originating from the pituitary anterior lobe Our preliminary in-vestigation for giant pituitary adenomas revealed the blood supply was much more extensive from the lower plane of the tumor, suggesting that giant pituitary adenomas may acquire different blood supply pat-terns from the normal anatomy during the process of enlargement[4] The surgical approach is usually decided based on the shape, volume, and extension of the tumor, usually the transsphenoidal or transcranial approach But this tumor is basically removed without intraoperative differentiation of the tumor from its feeding arteries, and these arteries passing through the tumor are cut and torn together with the tumor If total removal could not be achieved a cross section of the tumor with untreated feeding arteries inevitably remains just after the operation,
Fig 1 MR imaging disclosed a huge skull base tumor (a, b), and angiography identified two independent feeding systems (c, d).
Trang 3which may cause postoperative acute changes in the tumor
hemody-namics and consequent serious complications Detailed preoperative
examination of the feeding system and hemodynamics of this tumor is
not a priority at present, but we emphasize the need for case-by-case
operative strategy to prevent devastating outcomes after surgery for
this so-called benign but formidable tumor
4 Conclusion
Surgical planning was described based on information about thefine
angioarchitecture and feeding systems Case-by-case operative strategy
is essential for giant pituitary adenomas
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials
and methods used in this study or thefindings in this paper
References
[1] N.S Kurwale, F Ahmad, A Suri, S.S Kale, B.S Sharma, A.K Mahapatra, V Suri, M.C Sharma, Post operative pituitary apoplexy: preoperative considerations toward preventing nightmare, Br J Neurosurg 26 (2012) 59–63.
[2] M.Y Chong, S.M Quak, C.T Chong, Cerebral ischemia in pituitary disorders – more common than previously though: two case reports and literature review, Pituitary
17 (2014) 171–179.
[3] S.K Kurschel, K.A Leber, M Scarpatetti, P Roll, Rare fatal vascular complication of transsphenoidal surgery, Acta Neurochir 147 (2005) 321–325.
[4] Y Ogawa, K Sato, Y Matsumoto, T Tominaga, Evaluation of fine feeding system and angioarchitecture of giant pituitary adenoma – implications for establishment of surgical strategy, World Neurosurg 85 (2016) 244–251.
[5] J Lang, Clinical Anatomy of the Head Neurocranium, Orbit, Craniocervical Regions, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1983 200–201.