JOURNAL OF MILITARY PHARMACO MEDICINE N03 2022 204 MAJOR OUTCOMES OF LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY FOR RECTAL CANCER BY THE USE OF A CIRCULAR STAPLING TECHNIQUE Cao Minh Tiep1,3, Bui Tuan Anh1, Pham Van Binh2[.]
Trang 1MAJOR OUTCOMES OF LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY FOR RECTAL CANCER BY THE USE OF A CIRCULAR STAPLING TECHNIQUE
Summary
Objectives: To evaluate the major outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for rectal
cancer by the use of a circular side stapling technique at Military Hospital 103,
Military Medical University from 1/2016 to 4/2019 Subjects and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 88 patients with rectal cancer Results
and conclusion: Time for post-surgical pain-relief was 3.49 ± 0.66 days; time to
passage of first flatus following surgery was 3.52 ± 0.64 days; time to passage of first stool was 4.51 ± 1.08 Early complications included anastomosis leak (2.3%); surgical site infection (4.5%); early intestinal obstruction (1.3%); bladder dysfunction (11.4%) Late complications consisted of anastomotic stenosis (1.1%), inflammation at the anastomosis (4.5%), defecation disorders (5.7%), semi-intestinal obstruction (2.3%), protrusion of the abdominal wall (1.1%) 75%
of patients recovered well after 3 months of surgery No recurrence was found in 79.5%, recurrence and distal metastasis accounted for 20.5%
* Keywords: Complication; Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer; Circular
side stapling technique
INTRODUCTION
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common
malignant disease of digestive tract and
the third most deadly cancer in the
world [1] Among these digestive
cancers, rectal cancer (RC) is the third
most common cancer and is responsible
for almost 40,000 new cases per year
in USA [2] According to GLOBOCAN
2018 data, RC is the eighth most incident cancer in the world The incidence of colorectal malignancy is higher in males than in females and the male/female ratio is 1.5/1, and RC predominantly affects persons over the age of 65 years [1] In Vietnam,
3 Vietnamese-Czechoslovak Friendship Hospital, Hai Phong
Corresponding author: Cao Minh Tiep (caominhtiepbsn9@gmail.com)
Date received: 17/4/2022
Date accepted: 27/4/2022
Trang 2in terms of incidence, RC ranks fourth
in among males and second among
females, and is a leading cause of
cancer-related deaths According to
recent statistcs, each year, Vietnam has
recorded about 15,000 new cases,
corresponding to 13.4/100.000 population
and 7,000 deaths It is predicted by
2025 to be the second most common
cause of cancer deaths when numbers
for men and women are combined [3]
The first endoscopic surgery on
colorectal cancer was performed in
1990 This technique showed the
prominent advantages compared to
open surgery in terms of short- and
long-term outcomes, and it is gradually
replacing open surgery [4] There
have been a number of reports on
better short-term outcomes following
laparoscopic surgery including
reduction of morbidity, reduction of
blood loss, pain relief, and faster
recovery Some reports showed that
the endoscopic surgery must be
considered “the golden standard” in the
treatment of rectal cancer, but its
surgical application is not high because
its potential treatment, particularly in
lymph node removal is still doubtful
Thus, many studies were conducted to
evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic
surgery for rectal cancer [5]
Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer by the use of a circular side stapling technique has been extensively used in clinics To date, there have been some domestic researches on the feasibility as well as the benefit of this technique, but few studies have been done to evaluate its outcomes From the clinical practice together with great demand for improvement of the treatment quality, we did this research
with the following objectives: To
evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer by the use of
a circular side stapling technique in the Gastroenterology Department, Military Hospital 103, and Abdominal Surgery Department, K Tan Trieu Hospital from 1/2016 to 4/2019
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
1 Subjects, location, and study time
88 patients with rectal cancer were treated at Gastroenterology Department, Military Hospital 103, and Abdominal Surgery Department, K Tan Trieu Hospital from 1/2016 to 4/2019
* Inclusion criteria:
+ Patients with RC were treated by laparoscopic surgery using a circular stapling technique;
Trang 3+ Having pathologic results
showing RC;
+ Agree to participate in the study;
+ Patients’ medical records included
adequately necessary information and
were followed post-operation
* Exclusion criteria:
+ RC combined with other cancer in
the different parts of the colon
+ Patients previously underwent
surgical treatment of rectal cancer
+ Patients with recurrent RC
2 Methods
* Study design:
This was a cross-sectional study
using prospective data
* Sample size/sampling process:
All patients with RC fulfilled adequate
inclusion criteria; using a convenient
sampling process
* Indices and variables according to
study content:
- Patients’ general characteristics:
+ Common features: age, gender,
BMI
+ Laboratory features: Patient
classification according to the
macroscopic image of colorectal
cancer results of rectal biopsy
- Surgical outcomes:
+ Surgical outcomes: operating time,
kind of circular side stapling technique,
postoperative follow-up, and care, early complications, early outcomes, late complications, sequelea, recovery outcomes at three postoperative months + Oncologic outcomes: cancer cell, postoperative TNM classification, survival rate
* Data collection:
+ Evaluating the early outcomes by pre/post operative examination
+ Collecting fully clinical/laboratory information during the treatment, postoperative follow-up according to the well-designed medical record
+ Listing patients according to their number of medical record
+ Inviting patients to be directly reexamined or sending them questionnaires so that the patients can evaluate themselves or interviewing them by phone
* Technique process:
- Indication for laparoscopic surgery for RC by using a circular side stapling technique:
+ In case rectal tumors are in the upper 2/3 and 6 cm or above from the anal margin, conservative surgery of the sphincter can be used that included:
High Anterior Resection: HAR:
anastomosis above peritoneal reflection
Trang 4Low Anterior resection: LAR:
anastomosis is located under the
rectovesical pouch or 2 cm above the
dentate line
+ In case rectal tumors are in the
lower third and located up to 4 cm or
above and less than 6cm from the anal
margin, those which do not yet invade
the anal sphincter and tumors in the
early stage, Super Low Anterior resection can be performed: SLRA: the anastomosis
is located 0-2 cm from the dentate line
* Data analysis:
Data were entered and analysed
by using software STATA 14 and the analysis process was at the
Mathematics and Informatics Departure, Military Medical University
RESULTS
1 Patients characteristics
* Age and gender:
Patients’ mean age was 58.88 ± 12.2 years (min: 23-max: 81); 51.1% were
male and 48.9% were female male/female ratio was proximately 1:1
* Clinical features:
There were 10.2% underweight, 63.3% normal weight, 9.1% overweight and
obese patients, class 1 obesity was found in 17%
* Laboratory features of studied subjects:
Figure 1: Macroscopy of rectal cancer
Damage morphology was mainly wart (64.9%) and wart-ulcer (23.7%)
Trang 52 Features of cancer cells and postoperative TNM stage
Table 1: Type of cancer cell
In terms of pathological anatomy, glandular epithelial carcinoma represented 86.4%, and there was one case of the cancerous polyp
Table 2: Postoperative TNM stage
The majority of patients belonged to the stage II-III constituting 78.4% 19.3%
of patients were in stage I, and 2.3% of them were in stage IV
3 Surgical outcomes
Mean operating time: 151.99 ± 41.967 minutes with a minimum of 100 minutes and a maximum of 270 minutes
Table 3: Type of circular staplers
Type of circular staplers Number (n) Percentage (%)
The circular stapler most frequently used was CDH 29 and CDH 31
Trang 6Table 4: Treatment follow-up and postoperative care
Mean time for taking pain relief medication after the operation was 3.49 ± 0.66 days Mean time for passage of flatus after the operation was 3.52 ± 0.64, and mean time for passage of first stool after the operation was 4.51 ± 1.08 days Table 5: Early complications
In the study, there were 15 cases with postoperative complications representing 17% which is primarily associated with bladder dysfunction (10 cases, representing 11.4%)
Figure 2: Early outcome evaluation
Among 88 cases, 83% achieved good results, and no postoperative complications occurred There were 15.9% of patients with early complications who had fairly
Trang 7good results These patients received internal treatment without surgical intervention Poor result was observed in 1.1% that needed to be re-operated
Table 6: Late complication and sequelae
Upon re-examining patients, 13 patients had late complications in which one case suffered from anastomotic stenosis, 4 cases had inflammation at the anastomosis detected by rectal endoscopy, 5 cases had defecation disorder, and 2 cases had semi-intestinal obstruction requiring internal therapy There was one case with the protrusion of the abdominal wall that was successfully operated Table 7: Recovery outcomes at 3 months after surgery
Postoperative recovery was achieved by 75% of the patients, they could integrate into social life in the third month There were only 14.8% of patients who could do it by themselves, and 10.2% needed the support from others after the operation