The adsorption of APP on the lipid monolayers displayed a significant head group dependency, suggesting that the changes in surface pressure produced by the protein were probably affected
Trang 1The amyloid precursor protein interacts with neutral lipids
Liposomes and monolayer studies
Raghda Lahdo1, Ste´phane Coillet-Matillon1, Jean-Paul Chauvet2and Laurence de La Fournie`re-Bessueille1
1
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie Biologique, Universite´ Claude Bernard, Lyon, France;2IFOS, Equipe Bioinge´nierie et Reconnaissance Ge´ne´tique, Ecully, France
The amyloid protein precursor (APP) was incorporated into
liposomes or phospholipid monolayers APP insertion into
liposomes required neutral lipids, such as L
-a-phospha-tidylcholine, in the target membrane It was prevented in
vesicles containing L-a-phosphatidylserine The insertion
was enhanced in acidic solutions, suggesting that it is
modulated by specific charge/charge interactions
Surface-active properties and behaviour of APP were characterized
during insertion of the protein in monomolecular films of
L-a-phosphatidylcholine,L-a-phosphatidylethanolamine or
L-a-phosphatidylserine The presence of the lipid film
enhanced the rate of adsorption of the protein at the
inter-face, and the increase in surface pressure was consistent with
APP penetrating the lipid film The adsorption of APP on
the lipid monolayers displayed a significant head group
dependency, suggesting that the changes in surface pressure
produced by the protein were probably affected by electro-static interactions with the lipid layers Our results indicate that the penetration of the protein into the lipid monolayer is also influenced by the hydrophobic interactions between APP and the lipid CD spectra showed that a large pro-portion of the a-helical secondary structure of APP remained preserved over the pH or ionic strength ranges used Our findings suggest that APP/membrane interactions are mediated by the lipid composition and depend on both electrostatic and hydrophobic effects, and that the variations observed are not due to major secondary structural changes
in APP These observations may be related to the parti-tioning of APP into membrane microdomains
Keywords: amyloid precursor protein; liposomes; monolayer; phospholipids; protein–lipid interactions
Limited proteolysis of the amyloid precursor protein (APP)
generates the amyloid-b-protein (Ab), which is a major
component of brain senile plaques in Alzheimer’s disease
(AD) [1,2] APP occurs in neural and non-neural tissues as
several membrane-associated glycoproteins of 110–135 kDa
[3] It is a N- and O-glycosylated single-chain molecule
consisting of 770 amino acid residues, with an isoelectric
point of 4–5 The APP gene is expressed in brain and in
several peripheral tissues, but the physiological functions of
APP and its role in the disease are still poorly understood A
recent report proposed that APP normally behaves in the
brain as a cell surface signalling molecule, and that an
alteration of this function is one of the possible causes of the
neurodegeneration and consequent dementia in AD [4] The
Ab peptide is produced in the endosomal compartment and
in the endoplasmic reticulum or Golgi complex [5,6]
through the sequential action of b- and c-secretases [7–12]
APP could also be cleaved by an a-secretase, within the Ab
sequence, thus preventing amyloidogenesis, and results in the secretion of the larger soluble amino-terminal product (sAPP; reviewed [13]) The molecular mechanism involved
in APP cleavage and Ab production has still to be resolved Minor changes of the membrane lipid composition could affect the stability of APP as well as its processing, or alter the function of secretases within the membrane and their activities towards APP For example, modifications of the cholesterol content result in the alteration of Ab secretion [14], or in the variation of sAPP release from neuronal cells [15] Recent papers suggest that cholesterol levels regulate
Ab production and Alzheimer’s disease pathology by acting
on the multiple enzymes which regulate the APP processing [16–18] X-ray diffraction studies show that membranes isolated from AD brains are thinner than those obtained from age-matched control brains [19] This alteration in membrane thickness may change the spatial relationship between membrane-associated proteases and APP, modify-ing the amyloidogenic cleavage of the protein
In vivo, monomeric Ab appears to be a normal constitu-ent of cerebrospinal fluid but during normal aging or as a result of a disease process, Ab self associates into fibres that precipitate as plaques in the brain In vitro, the toxicity of Ab
is clearly correlated with the aggregation into cross-b-pleated sheet fibrils This process is enhanced by increasing the concentration of Ab or by altering the pH or the ionic strength [20,21] The fibrillogenic properties of the Ab peptide are highly dependent on the membrane composition [22–25] A growing number of studies indicate that Ab may alter the physicochemical properties of neuronal mem-branes, including membrane fluidity, membrane permeab-ility to ions and lipid peroxidation [26–29] These studies
Correspondence to L de La Fournie`re – Bessueille, Laboratoire de
Physico-Chimie Biologique, UMR CNRS 5013, Baˆtiment
E Chevreul, Universite´ Claude Bernard, Lyon I, 43 bd du 11
novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne cedex, France.
Fax: + 33 4 72 43 15 43, Tel.: + 33 4 72 44 83 24,
E-mail: laurence.bessueille@univ-lyon1.fr
Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer’s disease; Ab, amyloid peptide; APP,
amyloid precursor protein; b-OG, n-octyl b- D -glucopyranoside; LUV,
large unilamellar vesicles; PtdCho, phosphatidylcholine; PtdEtn,
phosphatidylethanolamine; PtdSer, phosphatidylserine.
(Received 10 January 2002, revised 11 March 2002,
accepted 15 March 2002)
Trang 2different ionic strengths and pH, with respect to the
structure of the protein
M A T E R I A L S A N D M E T H O D S
APP was purified from porcine brains as described
previ-ously [30] The procedure yields homogeneous preparations
as judged by SDS/PAGE The protein concentration was
determined by the Bradford assay [31] using BSA as a
standard.L-a-phosphatidylcholine from egg yolk (PtdCho),
L-a-phosphatidylethanolamine from egg yolk (PtdEtn),
L-a-phosphatidylserine from bovine brain (PtdSer) and
n-octyl-b-D-glucopyranoside (b-OG) were from Sigma
125I-labeled APP was prepared by the chloramine T method
to obtain a final specific radioactivity of 79 MBqÆnmol)1
All other reagents were of analytical grade
Preparation of liposomes
Vesicles were obtained by dialysis as described by Angrand
et al [32] or by extrusion as follows: large unilamellar
vesicles (LUV) were prepared from a phospholipid stock
solution dissolved in chloroform/methanol (2 : 1) The
resulting solution was then evaporated to dryness under a
stream of nitrogen and the last traces of solvent
subse-quently removed by a further 3–6 h evaporation period
under vacuum The remaining lipid film was then hydrated
in 20 mM Tris/HCl, 150 mM NaCl pH 7.4 at a higher
temperature (room temperature) than the phase transition
temperature of the corresponding lipid and dispersed
vigorously by vortexing LUV were formed using six fast
freeze–thaw cycles They were subsequently extruded 19
times through two polycarbonate membranes (400 and
200 nm pore size), using a mini extruder (Avanti Polar) The
final phospholipid concentration was 20 mgÆmL)1
Preparation of phospholipid–protein complexes
The incorporation of APP into liposomes was performed
using the detergent-mediated procedure described by Le´vy
et al [33] Briefly, the complexes of phospholipid and
protein were prepared at a phospholipid/protein ratio of
500 : 1 (w/w) The lipid/protein mixture containing trace
amounts of125I-labeled APP was incubated with the desired
concentration of b-OG The excess of detergent was then
removed by extensive dialysis against 20 mM Tris/HCl,
150 m NaCl, pH 7.4 buffer The resulting solution was
ent conditions, at varying pH and salt concentrations Monolayer measurements
Measurements were recorded at 21C using a Teflon trough (Riegler and Kirstein, Germany) Adsorption of the protein was performed at a constant surface area either in a small Teflon dish (diameter, 1.6 cm) with a subphase volume of 4 mL or with a larger Teflon dish (diameter, 3.4 cm) with a subphase volume of 19 mL The surface pressure was measured as a function of time by the Wilhelmy plate method using plates cut from filter paper (Whatman no 1) and a computer-controlled transducer readout The surface activity of the protein was recorded at
a free water interface and characterized in the presence of a preformed lipid monolayer Lipid monolayers were spread
at the air–water interface from a chloroform solution to give
an initial surface pressure (pi) Ten minutes after the formation of the monolayer, a desired volume of APP in
20 mMTris/HCl, 150 mMNaCl pH 7.4 or in Tris/maleate
20 mM, 150 mMNaCl pH 7, was injected below the surface The subphase was stirred continuously with a Teflon-coated stirring bar and a magnetic stirrer In similar experiments,
we examined the effect of pH or NaCl concentrations in the subphase buffer on the adsorption characteristics of APP in the absence or in the presence of a phospholipid monolayer
CD spectroscopy Far-UV CD spectra of APP were recorded on a Jobin-Yvon CD6 spectropolarimeter All measurements were done at
25C in a 0.05-mm path length quartz cell with an APP concentration of 0.15 mgÆmL)1 in the appropriate buffer (10 mMNaH2PO4/Na2HPO4) Blanks (various buffers with
or without lipids) were routinely recorded and substracted from the original spectra
R E S U L T S
Incorporation of APP into liposomes
We studied the ability of the protein to insert into preformed liposomes, via a detergent-mediated procedure, to investi-gate the potential association of APP with a lipid mem-brane The complexes generated between the protein and lipids in the presence of b-OG were fractionated on a discontinuous sucrose density gradient and the amount of
Trang 3radiolabelled APP associated with liposomes was
deter-mined Control experiments showed that all the
radioactiv-ity associated with pure APP in the absence of liposomes
was recovered at the bottom of the gradient (25% sucrose),
while pure phospholipid liposomes were collected at a
sucrose concentration of 15% After a 20-h dialysis period
of the reconstitution mixture composed of APP, PtdCho
liposomes and b-OG, we observed a comigration of
phospholipid and protein over a relatively narrow density
range, at 15% sucrose A small fraction of the protein was
associated with the lipid, and 80% free protein was
recovered at the bottom of the gradient (Fig 1) The
presence of the free protein indicates a low incorporation
efficiency of APP during the reconstitution procedure The
influence of lipid/protein ratio on efficiency of protein
incorporation into liposomes during reconstitution was
examined Proteoliposomes samples containing APP and
PtdCho liposomes were incubated in the presence of b-OG
at initial phospholipid/protein ratios of 1000 : 1, 500 : 1 or
200 : 1 (w/w) Most of the protein migrated at the bottom
of the gradient (Fig 1), which indicated incomplete
incor-poration of APP into liposomes whatever the lipid/protein
ratio Therefore, the following experiments were carried out
with phospholipid/protein ratio of 500 : 1 Reconstitution
experiments performed with ionic or zwitterionic detergents
were less efficient and less reproducible The role of different
phospholipids in the insertion of APP into lipid bilayers was
examined (Fig 2) Vesicles containing PtdEtn/PtdCho
(molar ratio 62.5 : 37.5) did not change the incorporation
rate of APP into the membrane However,
PtdSer-contain-ing liposomes totally prevented the bindPtdSer-contain-ing of APP to the
phospholipid membrane These results suggest that charge–
charge interactions between phospholipids and APP are
involved in the protein insertion process to the membrane
We repeated these experiments at various pH or with higher
concentrations of NaCl in the buffer The APP
incorpor-ation was increased threefold to fourfold at acidic pH for
neutral phospholipids (PtdCho or PtdCho/PtdEtn vesicles)
as shown in Fig 2 These results indicate that APP insertion
in the lipid bilayer is enhanced at a pH close to the pIof the protein An increasing salt concentration lead to a decreased incorporation rate of APP into preformed LUVs to approximatively zero at 0.3M NaCl (data not shown) These data show that APP insertion in the lipid bilayer is inhibited by a high concentration of salt
Monolayer experiments Adsorption of APP at the air–water interface The surface pressure (p) was measured as a function of time for various subphase concentrations of APP in the absence of pre-formed lipid films (subphase: 20 mM Tris/HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) (Fig 3) When the subphase concentration
of APP was < 0.2 lgÆmL)1, no significant changes in the surface pressure were detected during 120 min (not shown) The effects of higher concentrations of APP on the surface pressure are shown in Fig 3A The results showed that the final surface pressure increased with APP concentration in the subphase, an indication that the interface was not saturated by the protein, for concentrations up to
1 lgÆmL)1 Moreover, the surface pressure increase does not occur immediately after the injection of the protein into the subphase (Fig 3A) For protein concentrations of 0.35, 0.5, 1 and 2 lgÆmL)1the surface pressure started to increase after 90, 50, 20 and 10 min, respectively For the lowest APP concentration used, the observed lag time reached several hours The sigmoidal shape of the p vs time curve suggests the occurrence of a co-operative process These results indicate that the adsorption of APP at the air–water interface is both concentration- and time-dependent The process of the protein adsorption can be analysed by a first order equation:
Fig 1 Density gradient centrifugation profiles for APP liposomes
reconstituted from b-OG Liposomes (1 mg) were incubated with b-OG
(16 m M ) and APP The detergent was removed by dialysis, the samples
were then submitted to a flotation on discontinuous sucrose gradients.
Fractions (0.5 mL) were collected from the bottom of the gradient and
APP content was measured by assaying for 125 I-labeled APP (- - -,
1 lg APP; –––, 2 lg APP; – ) –, 5 lg APP).
Fig 2 Effect of lipid composition and pH on the incorporation of APP into phospholipid vesicles Percentage of incorporation of APP into liposomes composed of 1 mg phospholipids (d, PtdCho; r, PtdCho/ PtdEtn; j, PtdSer) mixed with b-OG (16 m M , 20 m M and 14 m M , respectively) and APP (2 lg) at different pH After dialysis against the same buffer as that used for incubation, proteoliposomes were separ-ated on a discontinuous sucrose gradient The125I-labeled APP was measured in the collected fractions (0.5 mL) The percentage of incorporation was calculated as follows: [ 125 I-labeled APP radio-activity associated with liposomes/total125I-labeled APP radioactivity loaded on the gradient] · 100.
Trang 4ln pe p
pe p0
¼ t
where pe, p, p0, are the surface pressure values at
steady-state conditions, at time t and at time t¼ 0, respectively,
and s is the relaxation time
In order to evaluate the parameters that control the
successive steps of the adsorption of APP at the air/water
interface, the plots of ln(1–p/pe) vs time were obtained
according to Eqn 1 The curves (insert in Fig 3A) present at
least two linear parts According to Graham & Phillips’
work [34], the relaxation time s1, corresponding to the first
linear part, is corelated with the protein adsorption and
The presence of 5 mM NaCl in the subphase buffer decreased the surface activity to 4.5 mNÆm)1with a 2-h lag time (Fig 3B) The surface activity of the protein in the absence of lipids was also studied on subphase buffers of different pH (Fig 3C) Lowering the pH to 6 did not promote changes on the final surface pressure of the protein monolayer, but increased the lag time threefold At a pH below 6, longer lag times and lower surface activities for APP were observed (pe¼ 10 mNÆm)1 at pH 5, and
pe¼ 2 mNÆm)1 at pH 4) (Fig 3C) This result may be explained by the progressive reduction of the global charge
of the protein as the pH approaches the isoelectric point, giving a less hydrophilic character to the APP molecule Interactions of APP with phospholipid monolayers Increase in surface pressure (Dp) vs time curves (Fig 4A) observed for APP adsorption into films of PtdCho (initial
pi¼ 10 mNÆm)1), at different subphase concentrations, demonstrated that the rate of adsorption of the protein at the lipid–water interface increased considerably as com-pared with the surface activity of the protein at the air–water interface (i.e., the time to obtain the maximum Dp was decreased, even at low protein concentrations) The specific protein concentration used induced no change in surface tension of the buffer–air interface during 1 h, after which the protein was injected into the subphase in the absence of preformed phospholipid monolayer (Fig 3A) However, the increase of surface pressure of a preformed phospholipid monolayer occurred immediately after injection of the protein under the lipid layer These results suggested a very fast diffusion and incorporation process of APP into the lipid film The presence of the PtdCho monolayer slightly increased the final value of the surface pressure increase produced by the protein at this relatively low initial surface pressure (Fig 4A) The effect of the ionic strength was studied in order to understand the role of electrostatic shielding in the binding of APP to the phospholipid membrane Qualitatively, high ionic strength was found to increase the binding of APP to the lipid membrane (Fig 4B) The effect of pH on the APP surface activity was also analysed In contrast to the pH dependence observed with APP during the detergent-mediated recon-stitution, no changes in the surface pressure due to the incorporation of the protein was observed in a pH range of 4–8 (Fig 4C) Finally, the interactions of APP with spread monolayers of various phospholipids were studied at a low concentration of APP Fig 5A shows typical records of the
Fig 3 Kinetics recording the surface behaviour of APP at the air–water
interface (A) p–t curves corresponding to the penetration of APP into
the air–water interface under different bulk concentrations of the
protein (buffer: Tris/HCl 20 m M , NaCl 150 m M , pH 7; Teflon trough
19 mL, 9 cm 2 ) Insert: Ln (1-p/pe)) vs t plots for the adsorption of
APP into the air–water interface Protein concentrations in the bulk
are 0.35 lgÆmL)1(a) and 1 lgÆmL)1(b) (B) p–t curves corresponding
to the penetration of APP into the air–water interface in the presence
of various salt concentrations (buffer: Tris/maleate 20 m M , pH 7;
Teflon trough 4 mL, 2 cm 2 ) (C) p–t curves corresponding to the
penetration of APP into the air–water interface under various pH
(buffer: Tris/maleate 20 m M , NaCl 150 m M ; Teflon trough 4 mL,
2 cm2).
Trang 5surface pressure as a function of time corresponding to the
insertion of APP into PtdCho, PtdEtn or PtdSer
mono-layers spread at an initial surface pressure of pi¼
10 mNÆm)1± 1 mNÆm)1 PtdCho, PtdEtn and PtdSer
showed essentially identical surface pressure-area isotherms
and thus have an identical head group spacing at a given
surface pressure, despite some potential differences in acyl
group conformations [35] The adsorption of the protein to
the phospholipid monolayer produced a change in the
surface pressure (Dp) of 5 mNÆm)1for both PtdCho and
PtdEtn monolayers (Fig 5A) The same surface pressure
increase was observed when APP was diluted (final
concentration of 0.35 lgÆmL)1) in the buffer subphase
before the lipid monolayer was formed (data not shown)
Comparison of the results for pi¼ 5 mNÆm)1with those for
higher pi are illustrated in Fig 5B [Dp¼ f(pi)] The data
suggest that the increase in the surface pressure Dp due to
the adsorption of APP on the phospholipid monolayers is dependent on the initial surface pressure of the lipid film The similarity of the Dp vs time profiles for the phosphol-ipids PtdCho and PtdEtn (Fig 5A) confirmed the observa-tion that APP did preferentially interact with either one of the two phospholipids during adsorption at the air–water interface When APP was injected below monolayers of PtdCho, PtdEtn or PtdSer formed at piabove 23, 19 and
11 mNÆm)1, respectively, the protein was no longer able to induce any increase of the surface pressure (Fig 5B) These critical surface pressures for APP penetration (pc) corres-pond to the extrapolated initial surface pressures beyond which no increase in the surface pressure occurred
CD spectroscopy NaCl or pH effect on the secondary structure of APP As the interaction of APP with lipids is either pH or NaCl dependent, we have considered the possibility that these variations may lead to protein conformational changes The effect of NaCl on the secondary structure of APP was studied in the far UV region Fig 6A shows the CD spectra
Fig 5 Surface pressure increase after protein injection under different phospholipid monolayers (A) Penetration pressure (Dp) induced by the insertion of APP into the phospholipid monolayers (- - -, PtdCho; —–, PtdEtn; – ) –, PtdSer) Buffer: Tris/HCl 20 m M , NaCl 150 m M , pH 7 The initial surface pressure was 10 ± 1 mNÆm)1 (Teflon trough
19 mL, 9 cm2) (B) Surface pressure increase after protein injection with respect to the initial surface pressure of the phospholipid film (d, PtdCho; r, PtdEtn: j, PtdSer) Buffer: Tris/HCl 20 m M , NaCl
150 m M , pH 7 (Teflon trough 19 mL, 9 cm 2 ).
Fig 4 Kinetics recording the surface behaviour of APP at the
phos-phatidylcholine–water interface (A) p–t curves of APP inserted into the
PtdCho monolayer under different bulk concentrations of the protein
(buffer: Tris/HCl 20 m M , NaCl 150 m M , pH 7; Teflon trough 19 mL,
9 cm2) (B) p–t curves of APP inserted into the PtdCho monolayer
under different salt concentration (buffer: Tris/maleate 20 m M , pH 7;
Teflon trough 4 mL, 2 cm 2 ) (C) p–t curves of APP inserted into the
PtdCho monolayer under different pH (buffer: Tris/maleate 20 m M ,
NaCl 150 m M ; Teflon trough 4 mL, 2 cm2).
Trang 6of APP in 10 mM NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4 buffer pH 7 at
varying concentrations of NaCl The CD spectra were
smoothed, and an analysis of the CD spectrum of APP at
neutral pH and ionic strength (Fig 6A) yielded 40% a helix
and 20% b sheet structures as reported previously [30] No
significant variation was observed when the NaCl
concen-tration increased A slight increase (10%) of the a helix
content was observed for a NaCl concentration of 0.5M
Far-UV CD spectra indicated that APP remains mainly
a-helical at mildly acidic pH, reflecting no major change in
the secondary structure between pH 5 and 7 (Fig 6B) The
spectrum of APP at pH 4 is somewhat flatter than the
others, reflecting a possible aggregation of the protein as a
consequence of its denaturation in the acidic buffer
Effect of LUVs The protein conformation in the presence
of neutral vesicles was analysed by CD spectroscopy (data
not shown) A small decrease of the a helix content of the
protein was observed in the presence of 2 mM PtdCho
vesicles Neutral phospholipid vesicles had a very weak
influence on the protein conformation
D I S C U S S I O N
In order to get insight into the role of lipids in APP
processing we have characterized its association with
artificial lipid vesicles or lipid monolayers APP was able
to interact with the membranes of liposomes, although
tion of the carboxyl functions reduce significantly the repulsion between the negatively charged groups on the membrane and the negatively charged amino acids present
on APP This requirement for a low pH suggests that electrostatic repulsion prevents the protein–membrane association Furthermore, no incorporation was obtained
in the presence of negatively charged lipids in the mem-brane, whatever was the pH The protonation of the phospholipid may change at acidic pH: a pKa (COO–) of 5.5 and a pKa (PO2–) of 3–4 have been reported for PtdSer [37] As APP undergoes a charge change from anionic to zwitterionic, only a part of PtdSer is protonated and still presents negative charges Incorporation at pH lower than 4 was not analysed because these pH values do not corres-pond to physiological conditions
APP tends to adsorb on the air–water interface, and the increase in surface pressure was similar to that observed with other membrane or soluble proteins [38–40] As reported by Graham and Phillips [34], the rate of the surface pressure change is a function of the stability of the protein structure, and more flexible molecules give a more rapid increase of the surface pressure By analogy with other proteins [38,39], such a phenomenom suggests that APP may have a relatively flexible structure CD experiments supported this hypothesis as the APP structure contains at least 30% of random coil in its native form [30] Determin-ation of the parameters that control the adsorption of APP
at the air–water interface suggested that the molecular rearrangement at the interface of the monolayer bearing the absorbed protein depends on both the activation energy barrier of the insertion process and the bulk concentration
of the protein This observation is in agreement with protein adsorption models [38–40] Under the experimental condi-tions used in this study, the interaction of APP with a neutral lipid monolayer is not dependent on the bulk pH, as
it was observed for binding experiments into liposomes These results may be explained by an effect of local interfacial pH [41] Therefore, alteration of the charge of the protein could be induced at the vicinity of the monolayer A difference in the orientation of the protein moiety during the insertion process into the monolayer film or into the bilayer containing the surfactant is also possible The lower surface activity obtained with the PtdSer monolayers could be the result, as presented before, of an electrostatic repulsion effect between lipids and the protein at physiological pH Anionic lipids, which represent 20% of biological membrane lipids, provide either a source of electrostatic
Fig 6 CD of APP (A) CD spectra of APP in phosphate buffer 10 m M
pH 7 as a function of salt concentration (—–, No NaCl; – ) – 150 m M
NaCl; - - -, 500 m M NaCl) (B) CD spectra of APP in phosphate buffer
10 m M NaCl 150 m M as a function of pH (—–, pH 7; –– –– , pH 6,
– ) –, pH 5; - - -, pH 4).
Trang 7attractions for the binding of proteins to membranes or a
source of repulsive effects [42–44]
The results presented are consistent with the hypothesis
that the binding of APP to phospholipid monolayers is also
driven by hydrophobic interactions, as the increase of salt
concentration favoured the penetration process of the
protein into the monolayer The binding of APP to
phospholipid films could be linked to a decrease in solubility
of the protein in the bulk phase at high ionic strength,
leading to a greater amount of the protein present at the
interface In other words, increasing the ionic strength has
the same effect as an increase of the protein hydrophobicity
As the hydrophobic nature of the interaction is stimulated
by increasing the ionic strength of the subphase, the
insertion rate of APP should be facilitated when the
electrostatic repulsion between the lipid–protein molecules
at the interface occurs It may be the case for the interaction
of APP with PtdCho monolayers
We investigated whether the observed changes are due to
conformational changes of APP, associated with secondary,
tertiary or quaternary modifications Far-UV CD spectra of
APP showed that the protein conformation is slightly
affected by either the pH or the salt concentration, in the
absence or in the presence of PtdCho vesicles We concluded
that the protein remains essentially in a a-helical structure
under these conditions We could not exclude, however, that
local changes may occur and escape detection using CD,
given the fact that APP is a large protein These binding and
CD studies show that the binding is not directly related to
the secondary structure of the protein, as binding can be
modified when secondary structure is not However, it
should be pointed out that CD spectra of the APP recorded
at pH 4 suggested an aggregation and/or precipitation of
the protein The possibility that the lower surface activity of
APP observed at pH 4 could be due to a lower available
amount of the protein cannot be ruled out No loss of
tertiary structure, as measured by intrinsic fluorescence,
indicates that the protein does not undergo major unfolding
during acidification or upon variation of ionic strength
(data not shown) Whether minor conformational
modifi-cations of APP, such as local variations in secondary or
tertiary structures in defined regions of the protein, are
associated with its lipid binding ability remains to be
determined Finally, we have considered the possibility that
the pH-induced conformational transition may lead to
changes in the protein quaternary structure We have used
gel filtration chromatography to test this hypothesis, and
have obtained no evidence for a different structure at
pH 4–7 (data not shown) The APP is apparently organized
as a trimer in the conditions used for these studies It was
recently reported that cellular APP can form noncovalent
homodimers and tetramers [45]
The molecular events which guide protein interaction at
the membrane surface or insertion into lipid vesicles are
important in order to shed light on the toxicity mechanism
of Ab which may be based in part on perturbations of the
lipid–water interface In vivo, production of Ab is believed to
occur through sequential cleavage of APP by b- and
c-secretases [46] Cell biological studies suggest three
potential locations for intracellular b-secretase activity:
endosomal compartments at mildly acidic pH,
Golgi-derived vesicles and endoplasmic reticulum/intermediate
compartments b-secretase has an acidic pH optimum of
4.5 [7,9,10] The final step in the generation of Ab from the amyloid precursor protein is the proteolysis by the elusive c-secretase(s) [8,11,12] From a biological point of view, the c-secretase cleavage is intriguing and unusual because it is an intramembranous cleavage The predicted transmembrane domain of APP (from Gly625 to Leu648) ends just before the putative c-secretase cleavage site (Lys649–Lys651), which implies that the c-secretase clea-vage sites are located in the hydrophobic environment of the cell membrane The in vitro model where APP is incorpor-ated into lipid layers could support the precision of the mechanism of proteolysis, and emphasize the lipid param-eters that influence this process
At this point, it is interesting to note that numerous studies have detected extensive interactions between Ab and anionic lipids More recently, different studies have suggested that cholesterol, an important determinant of the physical state of biological membranes, plays a significant role in the development of AD Whether this particular lipid has an effect on the insertion or on the interaction of APP with lipid membranes is under investigation Although we have shown that the inter-action of the protein with neutral or anionic model membranes depends on electrostatic and hydrophobic effects, the participation of other factors should also be taken into consideration
R E F E R E N C E S
1 Kang, J., Lemaire, H.-G., Unterbeck, A., Salbaum, J.M., Masters, C.L., Grzeschik, K.H., Multhaup, G., Beyreuther, K & Mu¨ller-Hill, B (1987) The precursor of Alzheimer’s disease amyloid A4 protein resembles a cell-surface receptor Nature 325, 733–736.
2 Tanzi, R.E., Gusella, J.F., Watkins, P.C., Bruns, G.A., St George-Hyslop, P., Van Keuren, M.L., Patterson, D., Pagan, S., Kurnit, D.M & Neve, R.L (1987) Amyloid b protein gene: cDNA, mRNA distribution, and genetic linkage near the Alzheimer locus Science 235, 880–884.
3 Selkoe, D.J., Podlisny, M.B., Joachim, C.L., Vickers, E.A., Lee, G., Fritz, L.C & Oltersdorf, T (1988) b-Amyloid precursor protein of Alzheimer disease occurs as 110- to 135-kilodalton membrane-associated proteins in neural and nonneural tissues Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85, 7341–7345.
4 Neve, R.L., McPhie, D.L & Chen, Y (2000) Alzheimer’s disease:
a dysfunction of the amyloid precursor protein Brain Res 886, 54–66.
5 Perez, R.G., Squazzo, S.L & Koo, E.H (1996) Enhanced release
of amyloid b-protein from codon 670/671 Swedish mutant b-amyloid precursor protein occurs in both secretory and endo-cytic pathways J Biol Chem 271, 9100–9107.
6 Annaert, W.G., Levesque, L., Craessaerts, K., Dierinck, I., Snellings, G., Westaway, D., George-Hyslop, P.S., Cordell, B., Fraser, P & De Strooper, B (1999) Presenilin 1 controls c-secre-tase processing of amyloid precursor protein in pre-golgi com-partments of hippocampal neurons J Cell Biol 147, 277–294.
7 Hussain, I., Powell, D., Howlett, D.R., Tew, D.G., Meek, T.D., Chapman, C., Gloger, I.S., Murphy, K.E., Southan, C.D., Ryan, D.M., Smith, T.S., Simmons, D.L., Walsh, F.S., Dingwall, C & Christie, G (1999) Identification of a novel aspartic protease (Asp 2) as b-secretase Mol Cell Neurosci 14, 419–427.
8 Murphy, M.P., Hickman, L.J., Eckman, C.B., Uljon, S.N., Wang, R & Golde, T.E (1999) c-Secretase, evidence for multiple proteolytic activities and influence of membrane positioning of substrate on generation of amyloid b peptides of varying length.
J Biol Chem 274, 11914–11923.
Trang 8directed to the active site covalently label presenilin 1 Nature 405,
689–694.
13 De Strooper, B & Annaert, W (2000) Proteolytic processing and
cell biological functions of the amyloid precursor protein J Cell
Sci 113, 1857–1870.
14 Simons, M., Keller, P., De Strooper, B., Beyreuther, K., Dotti,
C.G & Simons, K (1998) Cholesterol depletion inhibits the
gen-eration of b-amyloid in hippocampal neurons Proc Natl Acad.
Sci USA 95, 6460–6464.
15 Galbete, J.L., Martin, T.R., Peressini, E., Modena, P., Bianchi, R.
& Forloni, G (2000) Cholesterol decreases secretion of the
secreted form of amyloid precursor protein by interfering with
glycosylation in the protein secretory pathway Biochem J 348,
2307–2313.
16 Refolo, L.M., Malester, B., La Francois, J., Bryant-Thomas, T.,
Wang, R., Tint, G.S., Sambamurti, K., Duff, K & Pappolla, M.A.
(2000) Hypercholesterolemia accelerates the Alzheimer’s amyloid
pathology in a transgenic mouse model Neurobiol Dis 7, 321–
331.
17 Fassbender, K., Simons, M., Bergmann, C., Stroick, M.,
Lutjohann, D., Keller, P., Runz, H., Kuhl, S., Bertsch, T., von
Bergmann, K., Hennerici, M., Beyreuther, K & Hartmann, T.
(2001) Simvastatin strongly reduces levels of Alzheimer’s disease
b-amyloid peptides Abeta 42 and Abeta 40 in vitro and in vivo.
Proc Natl Acad S ci US A 98, 5856–5861.
18 Kojro, E., Gimpl, G., Lammich, S., Marz, W & Fahrenholz, F.
(2001) Low cholesterol stimulates the nonamyloidogenic pathway
by its effect on the a-secretase ADAM 10 Proc Natl Acad Sci.
USA 98, 5815–5820.
19 Mason, R.P., Shoemaker, W.J., Shajenko, L & Herbette, L.G.
(1993) X-ray diffraction analysis of brain lipid membrane structure
in Alzheimer’s disease and b-amyloid peptide interactions Ann N.
Y Acad Sci 695, 54–58.
20 Simmons, L.K., May, P.C., Tomaselli, K.J., Rydel, R.E., Fuson,
K.S., Brigham, E.F., Wright, S., Lieberburg, I., Becker, G.W.,
Brems, D.N & Li, W.Y (1994) Secondary structure of amyloid
b-peptide correlates with neurotoxic activity in vitro Mol
Phar-macol 45, 373–379.
21 Buchet, R., Tavitian, E., Ristig, D., Swoboda, R., Stauss, U.,
Gremlich, H.U., de La Fournie`re, L., Staufenbiel, M., Frey, P &
Lowe, D (1996) Conformations of synthetic b peptides in solid
state and in aqueous solution: relation to toxicity in PC12 cells.
Biochim Biophys Acta 1315, 40–46.
22 Choo-Smith, L.-P., Garzon-Rodriguez, W., Glabe, C.G &
Surewicz, W.K (1997) Acceleration of amyloid fibril formation by
specific binding of Ab-(1–40) peptide to ganglioside-containing
membrane vesicles J Biol Chem 272, 22987–22990.
23 Terzi, E., Holzemann, G & Seelig, J (1997) Interaction of
alzheimer b-amyloid peptide (1–40) with lipid membranes.
Biochemistry 36, 14845–14852.
Biochemistry 39, 10309–10318.
29 Vargas, J., Alarcon, J.M & Rojas, E (2000) Displacement cur-rents associated with the insertion of Alzheimer disease amyloid b-peptide into planar bilayer membranes Biophys J 79, 934–944.
30 de La Fournie`re-Bessueille, L., Grange, D & Buchet, R (1997) Purification and spectroscopic characterisation of b-amyloid pre-cursor protein from porcine brains Eur J Biochem 250, 705–711.
31 Bradford, M.M (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding Anal Biochem 72, 248–254.
32 Angrand, M., Briolay, A., Ronzon, F & Roux, B (1997) Detergent-mediated reconstitution of a glycosyl-phosphatidylino-sitol-protein into liposomes Eur J Biochem 250, 168–176.
33 Le´vy, D., Gulik, A., Bluzat, A & Rigaud, J.L (1992) Recon-stitution of the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca 2+ -ATPase: mech-anisms of membrane protein insertion into liposomes during reconstitution procedures involving the use of detergents Biochim Biophys Acta 1107, 283–298.
34 Graham, D.G & Phillips, M.C (1979) Proteins at liquid interface.
J Colloid Interface Sci 70, 403–414.
35 Pascher, I., Lundmark, M., Nyholm, P.G & Sundell, S (1992) Crystal structures of membrane lipids Biochim Biophys Acta
1113, 339–373.
36 Parmar, M.M., Edwards, K & Madden, T.D (1999) Incorpora-tion of bacterial membrane proteins into liposomes: factors influencing protein reconstitution Biochim Biophys Acta 1421, 77–90.
37 van Dijck, P.W., de Kruijff, B., Verkleij, A.J., van Deenen, L.L &
de Gier, J (1978) Comparative studies on the effects of pH and
Ca 2+ on bilayers of various negatively charged phospholipids and their mixtures with phosphatidylcholine Biochim Biophys Acta
512, 84–96.
38 Maget-Dana, R (1999) The monolayer technique: a potent tool for studying the interfacial properties of antimicrobial and mem-brane-lytic peptides and their interactions with lipid membranes Biochim Biophys Acta 1462, 109–140.
39 Sun, Y., Wang, S & Sui, S (2000) Penetration of human apo-lipoprotein H into air/water interface with and without phospho-lipid monolayers Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochem Eng Aspects.
175, 105–112.
40 de La Fournie`re, L., I vanova, M.G., Blond, J.-P., Carrie`re, F & Verger, R (1994) Surface behavior of human pancreatic and gastric lipases Colloids Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 2, 585–593.
41 McLaughlin, S (1989) The electrostatic properties of membranes Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 18, 113–136.
42 Mel, S.F & Stroud, R.M (1993) Colicin Ia inserts into negatively charged membranes at low pH with a tertiary but little secondary structural change Biochemistry 32, 2082–2089.
43 Nalefski, E.A., McDonagh, T., Somers, W., Seehra, J., Falke, J.J.
& Clark, J.D (1998) Independent folding and ligand specificity of
Trang 9the C2 calcium-dependent lipid binding domain of cytosolic
phospholipase A2 J Biol Chem 273, 1365–1372.
44 Smith, E.R & Storch, J (1999) The adipocyte fatty acid-binding
protein binds to membranes by electrostatic interactions J Biol.
Chem 274, 35325–35330.
45 Scheuermann, S., Hambsch, B., Hesse, L., Stumm, J., Schmidt, C.,
Beher, D., Bayer, T.A., Beyreuther, K & Multhaup, G (2001)
Homodimerization of amyloid precursor protein and its implica-tion in the amyloidogenic pathway of Alzheimer’s disease J Biol Chem 276, 33923–33929.
46 Checler, F (1995) Processing of the b-amyloid precursor protein and its regulation in Alzheimer’s disease J Neurochem 65, 1431– 1444.