Our results suggest that hemolin has two binding sites for LPS, one that interacts with the phosphate groups of lipid A and one that interacts with the O-specific antigen and the outer-c
Trang 1Binding of hemolin to bacterial lipopolysaccharide and lipoteichoic acid
An immunoglobulin superfamily member from insects as a pattern-recognition
receptor
Xiao-Qiang Yu and Michael R Kanost
Department of Biochemistry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA
Hemolin, a plasma protein from lepidopteran insects, is
composed of four immunoglobulin domains Its synthesis is
induced by microbial challenge We investigated the
biological functions of hemolin in Manduca sexta It was
found to bind to the surface of bacteria and yeast, and
caused these micro-organisms to aggregate Hemolin was
demonstrated to bind to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from
negative bacteria and to lipoteichoic acid from
Gram-positive bacteria Binding of hemolin to smooth-type forms
of LPS was competed for efficiently by lipoteichoic acid and
by rough mutant (Ra and Rc) forms of LPS, which differ in
polysaccharide length Binding of hemolin to LPS was
partially inhibited by calcium and phosphate Hemolin
bound to the lipid A component of LPS, and this binding was completely blocked by free phosphate Our results suggest that hemolin has two binding sites for LPS, one that interacts with the phosphate groups of lipid A and one that interacts with the O-specific antigen and the outer-core carbohydrates of LPS The binding properties of M sexta hemolin suggest that it functions as a pattern-recognition protein with broad specificity in the defense against micro-organisms
Keywords: hemolin; insect immunity; lipopolysaccharide; lipoteichoic acid; pattern recognition receptor
Upon microbial infection, insects synthesize defensive
plasma proteins, which include antimicrobial peptides and
proteins, lectins, and cell adhesion molecules [1–3] One such
protein is hemolin, a member of the immunoglobulin (Ig)
superfamily Hemolin contains four Ig domains of the I-set
type which are most similar to those in neural cell adhesion
molecules [4–6] Hemolin has been isolated from
hemo-lymph of two immune-challenged lepidopteran insects,
Hyalophora cecropiaand Manduca sexta [7,8] A
hemolin-like cDNA was also cloned from the fall webworm,
Hyphantria cunea[9] Hemolin is synthesized mainly in fat
body in response to microbial challenge [4,8], but it is also
synthesized in the absence of infection in embryos [10] and
in fat body and midgut during metamorphosis [3,11,12]
Hemolin expressed at different developmental stages of
M sextadiffers in carbohydrate content Hemolin isolated
from adult moths and from bacteria-induced larvae
con-tains noncovalently bound carbohydrates, whereas hemolin
from wandering stage (prepupal) larvae lacks carbohydrates
[11]
Available data suggest that hemolin functions in immune
responses by interacting with insect hemocytes and with
bacteria It binds to hemocytes and bacteria, and its binding
to hemocytes inhibits hemocyte aggregation [5,13–15] Hemolin from H cecropia interacts with bacterial lipopoly-saccharide (LPS) and its lipid A component [15,16] and binds to hemocytes in a calcium-dependent manner [17] A membrane-bound form of hemolin has also been reported [18] It has been suggested that hemolin may modulate hemocytic activities in development and during immune responses [12], and may function as an opsonin or as a pathogen-recognition molecule in the defense against infec-tion [14–16] The horseshoe-shape arrangement of the Ig domains in the structure of H cecropia hemolin suggested a mechanism for homophilic binding of hemolin to molecules
on the surface of hemocytes or micro-organisms [6] However, the biological functions of hemolin in insects are still not well understood
Recognition of nonself plays an essential role in initiating immune responses The vertebrate innate immune system and invertebrate immune responses rely on a set of proteins known as pathogen-recognition receptors These proteins bind to conserved features of microbial surfaces such as LPS, lipoteichoic acid (LTA) and peptidoglycan from bacterial cell walls, and b-1,3-glucan from fungal cell walls [19,20] Such recognition may initiate a variety of immune responses in insects, including prophenoloxidase activation, phagocytosis, nodule formation, and encapsu-lation
In this paper, we focus on the biological functions of hemolin in defense against microbial infection We investi-gated its binding to Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, yeast, and bacterial LPS and LTA Our results indicate that hemolin functions as a pattern-recognition receptor with a broad specificity for diverse pathogens in the defense against micro-organisms
Correspondence to M R Kanost, Department of Biochemistry,
Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Fax: + 785 532 7278, Tel.: + 785 532 6964,
E-mail: kanost@ksu.edu
Abbreviations: KDO, 2-oxo-3-deoxyoctanoate; LPS,
lipopolysac-charide; LTA, lipoteichoic acid.
(Received 22 October 2001, revised 6 February 2002, accepted 8
February 2002)
Trang 2Hemolin from hemolymph of naive wandering stage
larvae (hemolin form W1 which lacks bound
carbohy-drate) was purified as described previously [11], and
used for all experiments Smooth LPS (S-LPS) from
Escherichia coli strains 026:B6 and 0111:B4, LPS rough
mutants Ra (E coli EH100), Rc (E coli J5) and Rd2
(E coli F583), diphosphoryl lipid A (E coli F583), LTA
from Staphylococcus aureus, 2-oxo-3-deoxyoctanoate
(KDO), laminarin, curdlan, zymosan, chitosan, mannan,
glucose, galactose, mannose, xylose, N-acetylglucosamine
(GlcNAc), and N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) were
purchased from Sigma The Re mutant of LPS (E coli
D31m4) was from List Biological Laboratory Inc
(Campbell, CA, USA) Peptidoglycan (from S aureus)
was purchased from Fluka
Agglutination of bacteria and yeast by hemolin
Fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled S aureus, E coli, or
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Molecular Probes) were
sus-pended in Tris-buffered saline (Tris/NaCl; 25 mM Tris/
HCl, 137 mM NaCl and 3 mM KCl, pH 7.0) and used
for the agglutination assay Hemolin at 0.5 mgÆmL)1 or
BSA at 1.0 mgÆmL)1 (as a control) was used in
agglutination of micro-organisms as described previously
[21]
Binding of125I-labeled hemolin to bacteria and yeast
Hemolin was labeled with125I using Iodobead (Piece) as
an iodination reagent One Iodobead was washed with
500 lL iodination buffer (100 mM sodium phosphate
buffer, pH 7.0) The washed bead was added to 1 mCi
Na125I (Dupont NEN) in 434 lL iodination buffer, and
incubated for 5 min at room temperature Then 250 lg
purified hemolin in 66 lL deionized water was mixed
with the solution containing the Iodobead, followed by
incubation for 3 min at room temperature The
Iodo-bead was removed, and 125I-labeled hemolin was
sepa-rated from free 125I by applying the solution to an
equilibrated Sephadex G-25 desalting column (PD10,
Pharmacia) The column was eluted with NaCl/Pi
(25 mM sodium phosphate buffer, 137 mM NaCl and
3 mMKCl, pH 7.0), and 0.6 mL fractions were collected
Samples of 5 lL were removed from each fraction
and counted in a c counter Fractions containing
125I-labeled hemolin were pooled and stored at )20 °C
The specific activity of the labeled hemolin was
3.9· 105c.p.m.Ælg)1
125I-Labeled hemolin at a concentration of 1.0 lM was
incubated with formalin-killed E coli strain XL1-blue,
Micrococcus lysodeikticus, or S cerevisiae (yeast) (each at
3· 105 cells) in 50 lL Tris/NaCl containing 1 mgÆmL)1
BSA, in the absence or presence of 50 lM unlabeled
hemolin The mixture was incubated for 30 min at room
temperature, then centrifuged for 5 min at 10 000 g The
supernatant was removed by aspiration, and the cells were
washed four times with Tris/NaCl, then counted in a
c counter for bound hemolin
diphosphoryl lipid A as described previously [22] Hemolin
at different concentrations prepared in binding buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl, 50 mM NaCl, pH 8.0, 0.1 mgÆmL)1 BSA) containing 0 or 10 mMCaCl2, or in phosphate buffer (50 mM sodium phosphate, 50 mM NaCl, pH 8.0, 0.1 mgÆmL)1 BSA) was added at 50 lL per well, and binding was allowed to occur for 6 h at room temperature, before washing as described by Yu & Kanost [22] Bound hemolin was measured by first incubating wells with rabbit anti-hemolin serum (diluted 1000-fold with binding buffer), then with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-(rabbit IgG) Ig (Bio-Rad) (diluted 3000-fold with binding buffer), and bound alkaline phosphatase activity was determined by hydrolysis of p-nitrophenyl phosphate, all as described previously [22] The A405value of each well was determined using a microtiter plate reader (Bio-Tek Instrument, Inc.)
Binding of hemolin to immobilized LPS in the presence
of competitors The wells of a 96-well plate were coated with LPS from
E coli026:B6 (2 lg per well) Hemolin at a concentration of
30 lgÆmL)1 was preincubated with S-LPS (E coli strains 026:B6 and 0111:B4), LPS from rough mutants (Ra, Rc, Rd2 and Re), diphosphoryl lipid A, LTA, peptidoglycan, zymosan, laminarin, KDO (each at 0.8 mgÆmL)1), glucose, galactose, mannose, GlcNAc, GalNAc, or xylose (each at 0.4 mM) in 50 lL binding buffer for 3 h at room temper-ature The mixture was then added to S-LPS (E coli 026:B6)-coated wells, and the binding was allowed to occur
at room temperature for 6 h before washing and detection
of bound hemolin as described above
R E S U L T S
Agglutination of bacteria and yeast by hemolin
To investigate whether hemolin can bind to bacteria or yeast and cause aggregation of these micro-organisms, we performed an agglutination assay When E coli, S aureus,
or S cerevisiae cells were incubated with hemolin at a concentration of 0.5 mgÆmL)1, aggregates of bacteria and yeast were observed (Fig 1) The size of the aggregates correlated with hemolin concentration, with higher hemolin concentration resulting in larger aggregates (data not shown) When these micro-organisms were incubated with
a control protein, BSA, no obvious aggregates were observed (Fig 1) Agglutination of bacteria by hemolin was not affected by addition of EDTA (data not shown), indicating that hemolin does not require bivalent cations for its agglutination activity The observed agglutination of bacteria and yeast by hemolin may be due to binding and crossing-linking of these micro-organisms by hemolin Binding of hemolin to bacteria and yeast cells
M sextahemolin was reported to bind to E coli [23] and to enhance the association of E coli with hemocytes [14]
To assess the binding of hemolin to different types of
Trang 3micro-organisms, we performed a binding assay using
125I-labeled hemolin Radioactively labeled hemolin bound
to a Gram-negative bacterium, E coli, a Gram-positive
bacterium, M lysodeikticus, and to a yeast (S cerevisiae)
(Fig 2) Specific binding (demonstrated by competition
with unlabeled hemolin) accounted for 70% of the hemolin
binding to M lysodeikticus, 46% of the binding to E coli,
and 25% of the binding to S cerevisiae Thus, binding of
hemolin to Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria as
well as yeast appears to involve specific binding sites, with a
lower degree of specific binding to yeast cells than to
bacteria
Binding of hemolin to immobilized LPS
Daffre & Faye [16] reported that H cecropia hemolin
interacts with bacterial LPS We performed an
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure binding of
M sextahemolin to immobilized LPS Hemolin at different
concentrations was added to wells of a microtiter plate
coated with S-LPS from E coli (strain 026:B6) After an
incubation period and washing, the bound hemolin was
detected using antiserum to hemolin Binding of hemolin to LPS was concentration-dependent and saturable, reaching a maximum at 80 lgÆmL)1 hemolin (Fig 3) Nonlinear regression analysis of the binding data showed that binding
of hemolin to LPS fits a two-site binding model (R2 ¼ 0.92), with a high-affinity site (Kd1 ¼ 0.041 ± 0.065 lgÆmL)1) and a low-affinity site (Kd2 ¼ 53.2 ± 20.1 lgÆmL)1) As these binding studies were performed under nonequilibrium conditions, the calculated binding constants should be considered rough estimates Binding of hemolin to LPS in buffer containing 10 mM CaCl2 was approximately half of that observed in the absence of calcium (Fig 4) When the binding assay was performed in phosphate buffer instead of Tris buffer, we also observed an
50% decrease in binding of hemolin to LPS (Fig 4)
Hemolin binds to the O-specific antigen, outer-core, and lipid-A moieties of LPS
Bacterial LPS consists of three moieties: lipid A, the core carbohydrate, and the O-specific antigen (Fig 5) [24]
Lip-id A is composed of a b-glucosaminyl-(1,6)-a-D-glucosamine
Fig 1 Agglutination of bacteria and yeast by
hemolin BSA (1 mgÆmL)1) or hemolin
(0.5 mgÆmL)1) was incubated with fluorescein
isothiocyanate-labeled E coli (1.0 · 10 9
cellsÆmL)1), S aureus (1.0 · 10 9 cellsÆmL)1) or
S cerevisiae (yeast) (1.0 · 10 8
cellsÆmL)1) in Tris/NaCl After incubation for 45 min at
room temperature, cells were observed by
fluorescence microscopy.
Fig 2 Binding of 125I-labeled hemolin to bacteria and yeast.
125 I-hemolin (1.0 l M ) was incubated with formalin-killed E coli,
M lysodeikticus or S cerevisiae (each at 3 · 10 5 cells) in Tris/NaCl in
the presence or absence of 50 l M unlabeled hemolin The cells were
washed four times and counted in a c counter to detect bound hemolin.
Total binding represents the amount of hemolin bound in the absence
of unlabeled hemolin Specific binding was calculated by subtracting
the amount of hemolin bound in the presence of a 50-fold excess of
unlabeled hemolin (nonspecific binding) from total binding.
Fig 3 Binding of hemolin to immobilized LPS Hemolin at different concentrations prepared in binding buffer was added to LPS-coated microtiter plates and incubated for 6 h at room temperature The binding assay was performed as described in Experimental Procedures Each point represents the mean ± SD from four individual mea-surements The solid line represents a nonlinear regression calculation
of a two-site binding curve (R 2
¼ 0.92), and the dotted line represents the curve calculated for one-site binding (R 2
¼ 0.85).
Trang 4disaccharide backbone which carries up to seven fatty
acids The core carbohydrate is further divided into an
inner-core and an outer-core subdomain The inner core is
composed of KDO and heptoses, while the outer core
contains hexoses, primarily glucose, galactose, and
GlcNAc The O-specific antigen consists of a distinct
repeating oligosaccharide of up to 40 units [24] O-specific
antigen structures are highly variable compared with other
moieties of LPS LPS from smooth colony forms of
Gram-negative bacteria (S-LPS) contains all of these components,
whereas LPS from rough mutants (R-LPS) lack the
O-antigen and may also lack parts of the outer and inner
core polysaccharide
We performed competitive binding assays to test binding
of different moieties of LPS to M sexta hemolin Binding of
hemolin to immobilized LPS from a smooth strain of E coli
(026:B6) was measured in the presence of a 20-fold excess of
different forms of LPS or lipid A as competitors S-LPS
from E coli strain 0111:B4 competed more efficiently (82%)
for hemolin binding than did S-LPS from strain 026:B6
(64%) (Fig 6) Because these two types of LPS differ in
O-specific antigen structure [25,26], this result suggests that
hemolin can bind to the O-specific antigen of 0111:B4
Ra-LPS, which lacks an O-specific antigen, and Rc-LPS,
which also lacks part of the outer core, competed for
hemolin binding (59%) about as well as did S-LPS from strain 026:B6 (Fig 6), indicating that the O-specific antigen
of 026:B6 may not contribute significantly to hemolin binding However, Rd2-LPS, which lacks the entire outer core and two heptose residues from the inner core, was significantly less efficient as a competitor (30%), suggesting that hemolin may bind to galactose, glucose, or GlcNAc residues in the outer core or to heptose residues in the inner core The finding that glucose and galactose inhibited binding of hemolin to LPS (Fig 7) is consistent with this idea However, KDO, a component of the inner core of LPS, did not inhibit binding of hemolin to LPS (Fig 7) Re-LPS and lipid A alone were approximately equivalent to
Fig 6 Binding of hemolin to LPS in the presence of different forms of LPS as competitors Hemolin (30 lgÆmL)1) was preincubated with S-LPS (from E coli strains 026:B6 and 0111:B4), Ra-LPS, Rc-LPS, Rd2-LPS, Re-LPS, or diphosphoryl lipid A (each at a final concen-tration of 0.8 mgÆmL)1) in 50 lL binding buffer for 3 h at room tem-perature The mixture was then added to wells of LPS-coated microtiter plate and incubated for 6 h at room temperature The binding assay was performed as described in Experimental procedures The bars represent the mean ± SD from four individual measurements.
Fig 7 Binding of hemolin to LPS in the presence of saccharides as competitors Hemolin (30 lgÆmL)1) was preincubated with glucose, galactose, mannose, GlcNAc, GalNAc, xylose (each at final 400 m M ), KDO, or LPS (E coli 026:B6) (each at 800 lgÆmL)1) in 50 lL binding buffer for 3 h at room temperature The mixture was then added to wells of LPS-coated microtiter plate and incubated for 6 h at room temperature The binding assay was performed as in Fig 6 The bars represent the mean ± SD from four individual measurements Fig 5 Schematic diagram of bacterial LPS (modified from [24]).
Fig 4 Binding of hemolin to LPS in the presence of calcium or
phos-phate Hemolin at different concentrations was prepared in binding
buffer without calcium (solid line) or with 10 m M calcium (dotted line),
or in phosphate buffer (dashed line) The binding assay was performed
the same as in Fig 3 Each point represents the mean ± SD from four
individual measurements.
Trang 5Rd2-LPS as competitors for hemolin binding (Fig 6) These
results are consistent with a hypothesis that the binding of
hemolin to Rd2-LPS and Re-LPS is a result of interaction
with their lipid A moiety To further investigate the
interaction of M sexta hemolin with lipid A, we assayed
direct binding of hemolin to immobilized lipid A (Fig 8)
Hemolin binding to lipid A in Tris buffer was
concentra-tion-dependent, but was not saturated at 80 lgÆmL)1
hemolin When the assay was carried out in phosphate
buffer, binding of hemolin to lipid A was nearly eliminated
(Fig 8)
Hemolin binds to LTA on Gram-positive bacteria
To investigate to which components on the surface of
Gram-positive bacteria and yeast hemolin binds, we
performed a competitive binding assay, using microbial
components as competitors for binding of hemolin to S-LPS
(Fig 9) LTA and peptidoglycan, both cell-wall
compo-nents of Gram-positive bacteria, decreased binding of
hemolin to LPS by 86% and 26%, respectively, suggesting
that they bind to hemolin at the same site as LPS The
observation that LTA was a more efficient competitor than
was LPS itself suggests that hemolin has a higher affinity for
LTA than for LPS This is consistent with the finding that
more hemolin bound to Gram-positive bacteria than to
Gram-negative bacteria (Fig 2) Hemolin bound directly to
immobilized LTA (Fig 10) The binding was
concentra-tion-dependent and was not saturated at 50 lgÆmL)1
hemolin Nonlinear regression analysis of the binding data
showed that binding of hemolin to LTA also fits a two-site
binding model (R2 ¼ 0.89), with a Kd1 ¼ 0.12 ±
0.11 lgÆmL)1and Kd2 ¼ 110.1 ± 125.3 lgÆmL)1
Yeast cell walls are composed primarily of b-1,3-glucans
and mannans [27] Zymosan, a yeast cell-wall preparation
that contains glucan, mannan and chitin, decreased binding
of hemolin to LPS by 61% (Fig 9) But laminarin, a soluble
form of b-1,3-glucan, did not inhibit hemolin binding to
LPS (Fig 9), and hemolin did not bind to curdlan, an
insoluble form of b-1,3-glucan (data not shown), indicating
that hemolin does not bind to b-1,3-glucans Mannan and chitosan (deacetylated chitin) also did not inhibit hemolin binding to LPS (data not shown) However, mannose inhibited binding of hemolin to LPS by 28% (Fig 7), which suggests that hemolin may bind to the mannan on the surface of yeast
D I S C U S S I O N
Hemolin synthesis is induced by negative and Gram-positive bacteria, and it is the major protein produced in response to microbial infection in lepidopteran insects such
as H cecropia and M sexta [7,8,28], suggesting that it
Fig 9 Binding of hemolin to LPS in the presence of microbial compo-nents as competitors Hemolin (30 lgÆmL)1) was preincubated with LPS (E coli 026:B6), LTA, peptidoglycan, zymosan, or laminarin (each at 800 lgÆmL)1) in 50 lL binding buffer for 3 h at room temperature The mixture was then added to wells of a LPS-coated microtiter plate and incubated for 6 h at room temperature The binding assay was performed as in Fig 6 The bars represent the mean ± SD form four individual measurements.
Fig 8 Binding of hemolin to lipid A Hemolin at different
concentra-tions prepared in binding buffer or phosphate buffer was added to
diphosphoryl lipid A-coated microtiter plates and incubated for 6 h at
room temperature The binding was performed as described in
Experimental procedures Each point represents the mean ± SD from
four individual measurements.
Fig 10 Binding of hemolin to immobilized LTA Hemolin at different concentrations prepared in binding buffer was added to LTA-coated microtiter plates and incubated for 6 h at room temperature The binding assay was performed as described in Experimental procedures Each point represents the mean ± SD from four individual mea-surements The solid line represents a nonlinear regression calculation
of a two-site binding curve (R2 ¼ 0.89), and the dotted line represents the curve calculated for one-site binding (R 2
¼ 0.78).
Trang 6been shown to bind to E coli [4,23] and to increase the
association of E coli with hemocytes [14] We have found
that hemolin also binds to Gram-positive bacteria and to a
lesser degree to yeast In these studies we have investigated
the binding of hemolin to LPS and LTA, molecules that are
present on the surface of Gram-negative and Gram-positive
bacteria, respectively
LPS on the surface of Gram-negative bacteria is a
potential target for binding of pattern-recognition
recep-tors The availability of E coli mutants expressing
differ-ently truncated forms of LPS makes it possible to identify
the part of the LPS molecule to which a protein binds
H cecropiahemolin binds to wild-type E coli and also to
mutants lacking the core carbohydrate [29] We found that
M sexta hemolin bound to immobilized LPS and to its
isolated lipid A component in a concentration-dependent,
saturable manner Competitive binding experiments
indi-cated that hemolin binds smooth forms of LPS most
efficiently, but rough forms of LPS, lacking the O-antigen
and parts of the inner-core and outer-core polysaccharide,
and lipid A alone could also partially compete for hemolin
binding to smooth LPS Rough mutants Rd and Re,
containing only the lipid A moiety and part of the inner
core, competed no better than lipid A alone, suggesting
that hemolin does not bind to KDO in the inner core This
is consistent with the observation that KDO did not
compete for hemolin binding to LPS and with the results
of Daffre & Faye [16], who showed by photoaffinity
labeling that hemolin from H cecropia bound to S-LPS
and that the binding could be competed for by lipid A but
not KDO Approximately 30 ng hemolin specifically
bound to the surface of 3· 105 E coli cells (Fig 2),
indicating that 106molecules of hemolin bound to each
E colicell Because Gram-negative bacteria contain 106
molecules of LPS per cell [30], this result suggests that, on
average, each LPS molecule was occupied by one molecule
of hemolin
Results of binding curves and competition experiments
suggest that hemolin contains two binding sites for LPS
One site appears to bind to the carbohydrate components
in the O-antigen and outer core, and the other site binds to
lipid A Even though isolated lipid A binds to hemolin, it
could only partially compete for LPS binding to S-LPS
Similarly, Daffre & Faye [16] found that a large excess of
lipid A decreased hemolin binding to S-LPS by only 42%
The binding of hemolin to lipid A may involve an
interaction with the phosphate groups on lipid A Free
phosphate decreased hemolin binding to S-LPS by
approximately half and nearly eliminated hemolin binding
to lipid A An interpretation of these results is that
phosphate disrupts binding of lipid A by competing for a
site that interacts with phosphate groups, and that a
separate binding site that interacts with carbohydrate
components of LPS is not affected by phosphate In the
crystal structure of H cecropia hemolin, a phosphate ion
was found in the interface of Ig domains 2 and 3 [6]
Perhaps this region of the molecule is part of a binding site
for lipid A
hemolin binding to LPS by about half, very similar to the effect of phosphate Electrostatic interactions of Ca2+with phosphate groups of lipid A may mask these groups and interfere with the lipid A-binding site but not the carbohy-drate-binding site The opposing effects of Ca2+on hemolin binding to LPS and other hemolin molecules suggest that homophilic binding occurs at a site distinct from LPS binding
More hemolin bound to the Gram-positive bacterium
M lysodeikticus, which does not contain LPS, than to
E coli (Fig 2) When we tested whether cell surface components of Gram-positive bacteria can compete with LPS for hemolin binding, we found that peptidoglycan, the major cell-wall component of Gram-positive bacteria, inhibited binding of hemolin to LPS by 26%, whereas LTA, another surface component of Gram-positive bacteria, inhibited hemolin binding to LPS by 86% LTA was more effective than LPS itself as an inhibitor
of hemolin binding to LPS, suggesting that LPS and LTA bind to the same sites on hemolin and that hemolin may have a higher affinity for LTA Hemolin was also observed to bind directly to immobilized LTA (Fig 10) LPS and LTA are similar in containing both polysac-charide components and lipid components associated with phosphate groups [31], and these may occupy the same binding sites in hemolin Another insect plasma protein that has been shown to interact with LTA is apolipophorin-III of Galleria mellonella, which presum-ably binds to the hydrophobic components of LTA [32]
To function as a pattern-recognition receptor, a protein must bind to the surface of invading micro-organisms
We showed that hemolin binds to the surface of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and yeast, and caused aggregation of these micro-organisms Binding
of hemolin to the surface of bacteria appears to be due
to specific interactions with LPS on Gram-negative bacteria and to LTA and perhaps also peptidoglycan from Gram-positive bacteria Binding of hemolin to yeast was less efficient, and it is not clear from our experiments what part of the yeast cell wall is the hemolin-binding site Aggregation of micro-organisms by hemolin and the ability of hemolin to bind to hemocytes may promote phagocytosis and the formation of hemo-cyte nodules to clear micro-organisms from the insect hemolymph
Recognition of micro-organisms by pattern-recognition receptors is a crucial function of the innate immune system of vertebrates and invertebrates [19,20] Pattern-recognition receptors identified in M sexta and other insect species include C-type lectins [9,21,22,33–35], b-1,3-glucan-binding proteins [36,37], and peptidoglycan-binding proteins [38–41] The rapid induction of hemolin to high concentration in hemolymph (1.5 mgÆmL)1 in M sexta larvae) [5,8] and its broad specificity for binding to different types of micro-organisms suggests that it func-tions as a pattern-recognition receptor that participates in detection and elimination of a variety of pathogens in lepidopteran insects
Trang 7A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T S
We thank Maureen Gorman and Neal Dittmer for helpful comments
on the manuscript This work was supported by National Institutes of
Health Grants AI31084 and GM41247 This is contribution 00-320-J
from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.
R E F E R E N C E S
1 Gillespie, J.P., Kanost, M.R & Trenczek, T (1997) Biological
mediators of insect immunity Annu Rev Entomol 42, 611–643.
2 Bulet, P., Hetru, C., Dimarcq, J.L & Hoffmann, D (1999)
Antimicrobial peptides in insects: structure and function Dev.
Comp Immunol 23, 329–344.
3 Trenczek, T (1998) Endogenous defense mechanisms of insects.
Zoology 101, 298–315.
4 Sun, S.-C., Lindstrom, I., Boman, H.G., Faye, I & Schmidt, O.
(1990) Hemolin: an insect-immune protein belonging to the
immunoglobulin superfamily Science 250, 1729–1732.
5 Ladendorff, N.E & Kanost, M.R (1991) Bacteria-induced
protein P4 (Hemolin) from Manduca sexta: a member of the
immunoglobulin superfamily which can inhibit hemocyte
aggregation Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 18, 285–300.
6 Su, X.-D., Gastinel, L.N., Vaughn, D.E., Faye, I., Poon, P &
Bjorkman, P.J (1998) Crystal structure of hemolin: a horseshoe
shape with implications for homophilic adhesion Science 281,
991–995.
7 Rasmuson, T & Boman, H.G (1979) Insect immunity V
Pur-ification and some properties of immune protein P4 from
hemolymph of Hyalophora cecropia pupae Insect Biochem 9,
259–264.
8 Ladendorff, N.E & Kanost, M.R (1990) Isolation and
char-acterization of bacteria-induced protein P4 from hemolymph of
Manduca sexta Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 15, 33–41.
9 Shin, S.W., Park, S.-S., Park, D.-S., Kim, M.G., Kim, S.C., Brey,
P.T & Park, H.-Y (1998) Isolation and characterization of
immune-related genes from the fall webworm, Hyphantria cunea,
using PCR-based differential display and subtractive cloning.
Insect Biochem Mol Biol 28, 827–837.
10 Bettencourt, R., Assefaw-Redda, Y & Faye, I (2000) The insect
immune protein hemolin is expressed during oogenesis and
embryogenesis Mech Dev 95, 301–304.
11 Yu, X.-Q & Kanost, M.R (1999) Developmental expression
of Manduca sexta hemolin Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 42,
198–212.
12 Lanz-Mendoza, H.L & Faye, I (1999) Physiological aspects of
the immunoglobulin superfamily in invertebrates Dev Comp.
Immunol 23, 359–374.
13 Faye, I & Kanost, M.R (1998) Function and regulation of
hemolin In Molecular Mechanisms of Immune Responses in Insects
(Brey, P.T & Hultmark, D., eds), pp 173–188 Chapman & Hall,
New York.
14 Kanost, M.R & Zhao, L (1996) Insect hemolymph proteins from
the immunoglobulin superfamily Adv Comp Environ Physiol 23,
185–197.
15 Lanz-Mendoza, H., Bettencourt, R., Fabbri, M & Faye, I (1996)
Regulation of the insect immune response: the effect of hemolin on
cellular immune mechanisms Cell Immunol 169, 47–54.
16 Daffre, S & Faye, I (1997) Lipopolysaccharide interaction with
hemolin, an insect member of the Ig-superfamily FEBS Lett 408,
127–130.
17 Bettencourt, R., Gunne, H., Gastinel, L., Steiner, H & Faye, I.
(1999) Implications of hemolin glycosylation and Ca2+-binding
on homophilic and cellular interactions Eur J Biochem 266, 964–
976.
18 Bettencourt, R., Lanz-Mendoza, H., Lindquist, K.R & Faye,
I (1997) Cell adhesion properties of hemolin, an insect
immune protein in the Ig superfamily Eur J Biochem 250, 630–637.
19 Janeway, C.A (1989) Approaching the asymptote? Evolution and revolution in immunology Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol.
54, 1–13.
20 Janeway, C.A (1992) The immune system evolved to discriminate infectious nonself from noninfectious self Immunol Today 13, 11–16.
21 Yu, X.-Q., Gan, H & Kanost, M.R (1999) Immulectin, an inducible C-type lectin from an insect, Manduca sexta, stimulates activation of plasma prophenol oxidase Insect Biochem Mol Biol 29, 584–597.
22 Yu, X.-Q & Kanost, M.R (2000) Immulectin-2, a lipopoly-saccharide-specific lectin from an insect, Manduca sexta, is induced in response to Gram-negative bacteria J Biol Chem 275, 37373–37381.
23 Zhao, L & Kanost, M.R (1996) In search of a function for hemolin, a hemolymph protein from the immunoglobulin super-family J Insect Physiol 42, 73–79.
24 Raetz, C.R.H (1990) Biochemistry of endotoxins Annu Rev Biochem 59, 129–170.
25 Manca, M.C., Weintraub, A & Widmalm, G (1996) Structural studies of the Escherichia coli 026 O-antigen polysaccharide Carbohydr Res 281, 155–160.
26 Gupta, R.K., Egan, W., Bryla, D.A., Robbins, J.B & Szu, S.C (1995) Escherichia coli 0111 O-specific polysaccharide, prepared by treatment with acetic acid or hydrazine, bound
to tetanus toxoid by two synthetic schemes Infect Immun 63, 2805–2810.
27 Stratford, M (1994) Another brick in the wall? Recent developments concerning the yeast cell envelope Yeast 10, 1741– 1752.
28 Andersson, K & Steiner, H (1987) Structure and properties of protein P4, the major bacteria-inducible protein in pupae of Hyalophora cecropia Insect Biochem 17, 133–140.
29 Schmidt, O., Faye, I., Lindstrom-Dinnetz, I & Sun, S.C (1993) Specific immune recognition of insect hemolin Dev Comp Immunol 17, 195–200.
30 Inouye, M (1979) What is the outer membrane? In Bacterial Outer Membranes (Inouye, M., ed.), pp 1–12 John Wiley & Sons, New York.
31 Fischer, W., Mannsfeld, T & Hagen, G (1990) On the basic structure of poly (glycerophosphate) lipoteichoic acids Biochem Cell Biol 68, 33–43.
32 Halwani, A.E., Niven, D.F & Dunphy, G.B (2000) Apolipo-phorin-III and the interactions of lipoteichoic acids with the immediate immune responses of Galleria mellonella J Invertebr Pathol 76, 233–241.
33 Jomori, T & Natori, S (1992) Function of the lipopolysaccharide-binding protein of Periplaneta americana as an opsonin FEBS Lett 296, 283–286.
34 Koizumi, N., Imamura, M., Kadotani, T., Yaoi, K., Iwahana, H.
& Sato, R (1999) The lipopolysaccharide-binding protein parti-cipating in hemocyte nodule formation in the silkworm Bombyx mori is a novel member of the C-type lectin superfamily with two different tandem carbohydrate-recognition domains FEBS Lett.
443, 139–143.
35 Shin, S.W., Park, D.S., Kim, S.C & Park, H.Y (2000) Two car-bohydrate recognition domains of Hyphantria cunea lectin bind to bacterial lipopolysaccharides through O-specific chain FEBS Lett 467, 70–74.
36 Ochiai, M & Ashida, M (2000) A pattern recognition protein for b-1,3-glucan J Biol Chem 275, 4995–5002.
37 Ma, C & Kanost, M.R (2000) A b-1,3-glucan-recognition protein from an insect, Manduca sexta, agglutinates microorganisms and activates the phenoloxidase cascade J Biol Chem 275, 7505– 7514.
Trang 8Hultmark, D (2000) A family of peptidoglycan recognition
pro-teins in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster Proc Natl Acad Sci.
USA 97, 13772–13777.
A peptidoglycan recognition protein in innate immunity conserved from insects to humans Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95, 10078– 10082.