The compounds incorporating b-amino acid residues have found various applications in medicinal chemistry and biochemistry.The conformational pool of b-peptides com-prises several periodi
Trang 1R E V I E W A R T I C L E
Side-chain control of b-peptide secondary structures
Design principles
Tama´s A Martinek and Ferenc Fu¨lo¨p
Institute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Szeged, Hungary
As one of the most important families of non-natural
poly-mers with the propensity to form well-defined secondary
structures, the b-peptides are attracting increasing attention
The compounds incorporating b-amino acid residues have
found various applications in medicinal chemistry and
biochemistry.The conformational pool of b-peptides
com-prises several periodic folded conformations, which can be
classified as helices, and nonpolar and polar strands.The
latter two are prone to form pleated sheets.The numerous
studies that have been performed on the side-chain
dependence of the stability of the folded structures allow
certain conclusions concerning the principles of design of
the b-peptide foldamers.The folding propensity is influ-enced by local torsional, side-chain to backbone and long-range side-chain interactions.Although b-peptide foldamers are sensitive to solvent, the systematic choice of the side-chain pattern and spatiality allows the design of the desired specific secondary structure.The application of b-peptide foldamers may open up new directions in the synthesis of highly organized artificial tertiary structures with bio-chemical functions
Keywords: b-amino acids; foldamers; non-natural polymers; b-peptides; conformational control; stereochemistry
Introduction
The macromolecules and ligands responsible for the
func-tioning of living organisms are basically built up from a very
restricted number of building blocks (e.g a-amino acids and
nucleic acids).Proteins with a propensity to fold into
well-determined hierarchical 3D structures, such as enzymes and
receptors, have developed in nature in an evolutionary time
scale.However, thanks to the tremendous efforts that have
been devoted to the field, scientists now have a clearer
picture of the background to these developments [1,2].The
principles of protein design are not restricted to the realm of
the heteropolymers of a-amino acids, but can be generalized
and extended to any polymer with a tendency to fold into
the periodic and/or specific compact structures referred to as
foldamers [3,4].Such foldamers include synthetic oligomers
constructed from b-amino acids as monomers, designated
b-peptides, which are among the most thoroughly studied
and important models in foldamer chemistry
For the biopolymer community, there are a number
of reasons for the synthesis of b-amino acid-containing
compounds and analysis of their structures.As concerns the
aspects of foldamer design, b-peptides are very close
relatives of a-peptides, their structures containing amide
bonds that allow the formation of stabilizing H-bonds
Further, the b-amino acids are homologues of the a-amino
acids, the amide groups in the b-peptide backbone being
separated by two carbon atoms.This provides new options regarding the substituent pattern and the spatiality on C2 and C3with a view to control the secondary structure.The field of drug design can also benefit from the structural properties of b-amino acids.The incorporation of b-amino acids is a successful approach to the creation of peptidomi-metics with potent biological activity that are resistant to proteolysis [5–11]
It is interesting that the first b-amino acids were not produced in scientific laboratories.The conditions on primitive Earth were such as to lead to the formation of b-alanine [12] and b-amino acids originating presumably from comets or asteroids have also been found [13].Natural sources too produce b-amino acids [14–17], but reliable and efficient synthetic routes are indispensable; the relevant methods have recently been extensively reviewed [18–29] Despite the availability of reviews on b-peptide foldamers [30–32], there is increasing interest in the new results and conclusions, which justifies the present survey on the design principles
The conformational pool of b-peptides
It is clear from the general constitution of the b-amino acids (Fig.1) that the conformational space can be described in
a very similar way as for the a-residues.According to the convention of Banerjee and Balaram, the soft torsional degrees of freedom are defined as CO-N-C3-C2, C3-C2 -CO-N and N-C3-C2-CO designated /, w and h, respectively [33].It may be concluded from the presence of the additional torsion that the increased conformational space relative to the a-peptides significantly decreases the folding propensity of the b-peptides, in consequence of the higher entropy loss [34].The initial efforts in the laboratories of Seebach [35–38] and Gellman [39–41] and the increasing
Correspondence to F.Fu¨lo¨p, Institute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry,
University of Szeged, Eotvos u.6.Szeged, Hungary.
Fax: + 36 62 545705, Tel.: + 36 62 545564,
E-mail: fulop@pharma.szote.u-szeged.hu
(Received 14 April 2003, revised 24 June 2003,
accepted 16 July 2003)
Trang 2body of high-resolution structural data clearly demon-strated that b-peptides have an intrinsic propensity to fold into well-defined periodic structures.Soon after the first experimental observations, theoretical methods were deployed to explain the formation of such highly ordered structures [42–46].The main conclusion from the ab initio quantum chemical calculations carried out on blocked monomers and short oligomers is that the propensity to form periodic structures with helical symmetry is inherently encoded in the b-amino acid monomers.Obviously, these minimal models did not allow an exact quantitative estimation of the relative stabilities of the possible secondary structures as a function of the substituent pattern, but the results did facilitate an enumeration and classification of the periodic conformations in terms of the /,w,h map (Fig.2) The folded b-peptide structures can be classified on the basis
of the grouping of the a-peptide secondary structures [1] The periodic conformations include various types of helices and strand-like structures (Fig.3).The sheet nucleating turn segments are discussed later.Different designations are available in the literature for these ordered conformations
In the present review, we follow the nomenclature intro-duced by Gellman [31].In order to avoid ambiguity, it must
be stated that all the periodic structures possess helical symmetry, but strands will be distinguished from helices on the basis of the angle of the backbone H-bonds.The structures stabilized by H-bonds with an angle < 120 are classified as nonpolar strands, as these conformations may expose the amide bonds to participation in long-range interactions, with the formation of pleated sheets
The b-peptide foldamers have a number of interesting structural features.The H-bonds stabilizing the periodic conformations can attain parallel or antiparallel orienta-tions with respect to the directionality of the b-peptide chain.The orientation of the H-bonds is closely connected
to the number of atoms comprising the H-bonded ring Fig 1 General constitution, definition of the backbone torsions and
designation of the substitution pattern of b-amino acid residues.
Fig 2 /,w,h representation of the left-handed uniform periodic conformations of b-peptides The selected torsional data were taken from [22,33–37,43].
Trang 3formed between the donor and acceptor atoms.For the
structures with 6-, 10- and 14-membered rings, the donor to
acceptor orientation is parallel to the chain directionality on
going from the N-terminal to the C-terminal, while in the
8- and 12-helices and in the 8-strand the orientation is
antiparallel.Besides the novel H-bonding patterns, the sense
of the helix twist can also vary, leading to right-handed or
left-handed helices.Figures 2 and 3 depict only the periodic
conformations with left-handed helicity, but the
right-handed ones can easily be obtained via a mirror operation
that results in /, w- and h-values of opposite sign and
inverted configuration in the event of chiral substitution at
C2 and C3.Apart from the handedness, the size of the
H-bonded ring does not uniquely describe the theoretically
possible periodic structures within the conformational
families of 6-strands and 8-helices.For the left-handed
6-strands, there are three obvious combinations of
back-bone dihedral angles, which can produce periodic structures
designated 6I, 6II and 6III following the classification
of Hofmann [47].The left-handed 8-helices can also be
clustered into two subfamilies: 8I and 8II.It must be
emphasized that the conformational pool of b-peptide helical structures is not complete without the experimentally observed and theoretically studied alternating 10/12 helix (Fig.3) [36,37,48].This conformation has two sets of /,w angles: /1)90, w1 100, /2 100, w2)90, and
a uniform h)60.These torsions result in an alternating orientation of the amide groups and thereby a reduced dipole moment
Not only the helical conformations are encoded in the b-amino acid monomers.It has been shown that the torsion
h can occupy an antiperiplanar local conformation that leads to a strand structure with a tendency to form parallel and antiparallel pleated sheets [40].As the amide carbonyls
in this strand point in the same direction, the structure has a net dipole moment that is fundamentally different from the situation for the b-sheets formed by the a-peptides, where the amide bonds point in alternating directions, so that there
is no net dipole
Following this survey of the conformational pool of b-peptides, it should be noted that the torsion h cannot
be considered a very flexible conformational degree of
Fig 3 Backbone geometryof the
experiment-allyobserved b-peptide helices and strands with
left-handed helicity The structures were
modelled by using the representative dihedral
angles depicted in Fig.2.
Trang 4freedom.With a few exceptions, its angle is in most cases
restricted to synclinal (h ± 60) or antiperiplanar
(h 180).Accordingly, steps have been taken towards
handling the conformational pool of b-peptides in terms of
the reduced /,w space which is achievable in special cases
[47,49].However, the reduced representation does not in
general allow a unique description of the various periodic
conformations.For example, the 6II-strand and 14-helix
heavily overlap in the /, w map and h is necessary to
distinguish the conformations unambiguously.When the
folded structures with different modes of handedness and
various nonfolded structures are considered [50], the
problems with the reduced representation become even
more severe
Substituent effects on local geometry
The two carbon atoms in the b-peptide backbone provide
and efficient means with which to influence the intrinsic
secondary structural propensity of b-amino acid residues
It has been demonstrated persuasively that the secondary
structure motif can be efficiently controlled by altering the
substituent pattern [51,52].In the approach of Wu and
Wang, the effects exerted by the substituents can be
separated into two groups of components [45].One
involves the impact on the local conformational stability
at the residue level, referred to as the torsional effect.The
other group comprises the medium- and long-range effects
due to steric and electrostatic interresidue interactions
The torsional effect of methyl substitution on various
model fragments has been analysed thoroughly by
employing ab initio MO quantum chemical calculations
The local effect on / of monomethyl substitution at C3
with the S-configuration [(S)-b3-substitution] was studied
in the cases of N-isopropylformamide and
N-s-butyl-formamide, while the influence of (S)-b2 substitution on
w was modelled with isobutyramide [45] and
2-methyl-butyramide (Fig.4) [43] The potential energy profile of
/ indicates that its allowed values are restricted to the
region between 60 and 180.There is also a narrow
minimum around )60, with a relatively high rotational
barrier.The potential energy surface for w was found to
be rather flat, with two minima, in the range 60–180
and at around )60.The results can be transferred to
(R)-b3 and (R)-b2 substitutions by changing the signs of
the dihedral angles.These analyses reveal that a
side-chain in the b3 position has a significant structuring
effect on the local geometry exerted through the steric
interactions along /; indeed, the first stable periodic
conformation, the 14-helix, was constructed by using
homochiral b3-amino acids.It is interesting to note that
all the H-bond-stabilized periodic structures can be found
within the range /¼ 60–180 or / ¼)180–60 that are
in fact the preference regions of the (R)-b3 or (S)-b3,
substituted b-amino acid monomers
As concerns the nature of the b3 side-chain, a further
relationship was recognized recently by Raguse et al.[53];
the incorporation of side-chain branching adjacent to the
b-carbon atom stabilizes the 14-helix [54,55].This effect
may also be explained in terms of the local torsional
effects.Force field calculations suggest (Fig.5) that, as
the steric demand of the b3 substituent in the proximity
of the adjacent amide group increases, the conforma-tional space decreases for the torsion / (T.A.Martinek and F.Fu¨lo¨p, unpublished observation).The isopropyl side-chain corresponding to the (S)-b3-hVal residue significantly increases the energy minimum at )60, possibly making this local geometry inaccessible for the backbone, and narrows the flat minimum at around 120.For the (S)-b3-hLeu model, only the narrowing can
be observed, which is in good accord with the pro-nounced structuring effect of the b3-hVal residues.The b2 substitution provides a less efficient tool with which to affect the local flexibility of the torsion w; nevertheless, it can not be completely neglected
As was seen above, the appropriate conformation along the torsion h may be crucial for a certain periodic structure
to be obtained.X-ray and NMR spectroscopic methods have demonstrated the intrinsic feature of b-amino acids that the local geometry of h is confined to staggered conformations (synclinal or antiperiplanar) [46,56,57].The local, intraresidue interactions stemming from b2 or b3
substitution cannot bring about a prevailing h in solution, but by means of b2,3 disubstitution the conformational preference along the C2-C3 bond can be modulated successfully.A thorough comparative experimental study has suggested that the (R,S)-b2,3 or (S,R)-b2,3 relative configuration (Fig.1) stabilizes the antiperiplanar confor-mation for h via intraresidue interactions [40], which is a prerequisite of the polar-strand conformation found in hairpins as a model of the polar pleated sheet.These findings were supported by ab initio calculations [58]
Fig 4 Relative torsional energyprofiles for / and w, calculated for (S)-b3-Me- and (S)-b2-Me-substituted model systems [48] The reduced conformational space for both b 3 and b 2 substitution explains their significant structuring effect.
Trang 5A noteworthy example of the conformationally constrained
systems is the family of cyclic b-amino acids, where control
of the torsion h is achieved by covalent linkage between C2
and C3[31,39,52].For these b residues, the antiperiplanar
arrangement (h¼ 180) is inaccessible, and the folded
structures with helical symmetry are therefore promoted
The cyclic b-amino acids may be considered too constrained
to exhibit a real folding reaction [34]; nevertheless, a great
majority of the b-peptide foldamer structures and the
unordered conformations are also accessible with synclinal
conformation at h, and therefore the conformational
plas-ticity is sufficient to allow the folding process.This is
supported by the fact that the cyclic b-residue
2-aminocyclo-pentane-carboxylic acid (ACPC) can adopt torsion angles
from ± 13 up to ± 90, which facilitates the fine tuning
of the helix type adopted by b-peptide oligomers
construc-ted from cyclic monomers.The homo-oligomer of
trans-2-aminocyclohexanecarboxylic acid (trans-ACHC) forms a
14-helix, while trans-ACPC adopts a 12-helix, requiring
a larger h to accommodate the increased pitch height
[51]
The covalent restriction of h by employing a cyclic
b-peptide residue combined with the stereochemical tuning
of the preference regions of / and w produces efficient
control over the secondary structure formation [52].If
cis-(1R,2S)-ACPC is used, the C2-C3bond can be retained in a
synclinal position in spite of the (R,S)-b2,3disubstitution,
which would otherwise lead to an antiperiplanar
confor-mation promoting a polar strand.The (S)-b3substitution
forces / into the region 60–180, while the (R)-b2
configur-ation prefers w¼) 60–180.This set of torsions allows only
an alternating orientation of the amide bonds, which is present only in the 10/12-helix and in the nonpolar strands
As the configuration is unfavourable in the 10/12-helix for steric reasons (see later), the resulting structure is a nonpolar strand stabilized by weak six-membered H-bonds
Controlling the backbone to side-chain interactions
The regions of preference of the local torsion angles may be perturbed by changing the substituent pattern, but oriented synthesis of a specific secondary structure can not be achieved without considering the medium-range backbone
to side-chain interactions, which can override the local effects.The impact of the side-chain pattern on the secondary structure preference of b-peptides can be addressed to a first approximation within the framework
of the ÔfittingÕ theory established by Seebach et al.[37].The principle behind this is that any substituent in an axial orientation relative to the helix axis destabilizes the helical conformation because of the steric clash between the substituent and the b-peptide backbone.Thus, the side-chains occupying axial positions in the helical conforma-tions push the system to nonpolar strand or polar strand conformational states.For the left handed 10- and 12-heli-ces, the substituents R1 and R4 are axial, while for the 14-helix, R2and R3are axial (Fig.6); thus, any bulky side-chain in these positions disrupts the formation of the given periodic conformation.Analysis of the steric interactions, together with the local torsional effects, allows a finer-grained analysis of the effects of substituents on the folded
Fig 5 Relative torsional energyprofile for /,
calculated for model systems involving
(S)-b 3 -hAla (S)-b 3 -hVal and (S)-b 3 -hLeu residues
[48] The calculations show that the strong
structuring effect of the side chains with
branching adjacent to the b-carbon atom
stems from the altered local geometry
preference.
Trang 6structures.For example, the 10-helix secondary structure
has not been detected for b-peptide oligomers with
noncyclic side-chains, but only for b-oligopeptides with
strained oxetane side-chains [59], that, in general, suggests
a lower stability for this specific conformation.It is clear
that only substituent R2 and/or R3 [(S)-b3 and/or (S)-b2
substitution, respectively] is allowed sterically for the
left-handed 10-helix, but at the same time the geometry of the
structure requires / to be in the range)60 to )110, which
is in the higher energy region of the local torsion energy
profile calculated for (S)-b3 substitution (see above).The
10-membered, H-bonded pseudocycle, however, can be
found in the 10/12 helix that is preferentially formed by
oligopeptides containing an alternating sequence (S)-b2
/(S)-b3.These side-chains can occupy the preferred lateral
(equatorial) position in the left-handed 10- and 12-helices
and in the right-handed 14-helix as well, and therefore the
local torsional effect should also be considered.The
unsubstituted C3in the first residue allows /1to adopt a
dihedral angle of)90, while the (S)-b2side-chain provides a
slight local conformational preference for w1that promotes
a dihedral angle of 100.The second residue with the (S)-b3
substituent constitutes a strongly preferential configuration
for a torsion /2of 100.Overall, these torsional effects and
side-chain to backbone interactions may contribute to the
observed stability of the 10/12-helix for (S)-b2/(S)-b3
sequences
The role of long-range side-chain interactions
In folded a-peptide helix design, control of the interactions between the side-chains separated by a turn of the helix is a facet of major importance [60,61].The organizing forces may comprise the van der Waals and electrostatic inter-actions.As the circle of synthesizable enantiomerically pure b-amino acid building blocks widens, a variety of possible side-chains are available for participation in such stabiliza-tion [18–29].Inspecstabiliza-tion of the 14- and 12-helices (Fig.6) reveals that the juxtapositions necessary for the design of these energy terms are present, while the 10/12-helix lacks such directly adjacent lateral side-chains (Fig.7).For the 14-helix, all the b2 and b3 substituents with appropriate stereochemistry are proximal, at positions i and (i + 3) The adjacent side-chains in the 12-helix are (i)b3– (i + 2)b2 and (i)b2– (i + 3)b3
When the number of possible side-chain interactions and the pitch height are considered, the conformation most sensitive to the hydrophobic van der Waals forces is the 14-helix.This suggests that the stability of the 14-helix is augmented by the solvent-driven attractive forces between the hydrophobic side-chains.On systematic increase of the number of possible juxtapositions, extra stabilization can be observed for the 14-helix at the expense of the 10/12-helix, but b2,3-peptides with all the possible juxtapositions are destabilized by steric crowding [37].Unfortunately, it is
Fig 6 Steric axial side-chain to backbone interactions and the equatorial juxtapositions for left-handed 10-, 12- and 14-helices According to Seebach’s ÔfittingÕ theory, the structures display the unfavourable steric repulsions between the backbone and the side-chains in axial positions preventing helix formation.The juxtapositions of the equatorial side-chains separated by a turn of the helix allow stabilization by non-bonded interactions.
Fig 7 Steric axial side-chain to backbone interactions and the equatorial juxtapositions for the left-handed 10/12-helix As this type of helix possesses 10-membered and 12-mem-bered hydrogen-bonded rings in an alternating manner involving different interaction pat-terns, the Figure depicts the 10/12 and 12/10 structural motifs separately.
Trang 7difficult to confirm this trend by conducting experiments in
different solvents with increasing polarity, because the
higher dielectric value and specific interactions scale down
the stabilizing electrostatic forces of mainly H-bonding
origin, which overall counteracts the hydrophobic
stabiliza-tion [55,62,63].Sensitivity to an aqueous medium is also a
characteristic of the 12-helix [64].It might be speculated that
H-bond stabilization plays a more important role in
b-peptides than in a-peptides, and this might be the price
for the enlarged conformational space relative to the
number of possible H-bonds [65].As pointed out by Wu
et al the dipole–dipole interactions due to the uniform
amide orientation along the backbone are not only a
stabilizing factor, but additionally a source of cooperativity
in the formation of the 12- and 14-helices [66]
As regards the electrostatic interactions between the
side-chains, a useful tool has been developed with which
to increase the stability of the 14-helix even in aqueous
medium.With the choice of a negatively charged and a
positively charged side-chain in the relative positions
i – (i + 3), a salt-bridge can be formed at an appropriate
proton concentration [67,68].The side-chains of choice
are deprotonated b3-hGlu and protonated b3-hLys or
protonated b3-hOrn, whereby the most effective
stabi-lization can be tailored.A very similar stabistabi-lization
strategy of a disulfide lock between the helix side-chains
may be mentioned as an instrument with which to
promote formation of the 14-helix [69].Although this
establishes a covalent constraint to prevent unfolding and
therefore provides strong stabilization, it could lack the
controlling flexibility of the non-bonded interactions
discussed above
Nucleation
Certain b-residues or structural motifs have tailored local
conformational characteristics that allow the overall folding
propensity of a given b-peptide to be influenced.This
method of control of the secondary structure formation is
well known in the field of folded a-peptide design and is
referred to as nucleation [1].An efficient way to improve the
stability of a 14-helix is to incorporate the conformationally
constrained trans-ACHC in the b-peptidic sequence.Even a
single trans-ACHC residue in the central position of the
chain can significantly increase the stability of the 14-helix
[53,70].A similar 14-helix nucleation effect can be observed
for central (R,S)-b2,3or (S,R)-b2,3residues [37].A systematic
study by LePlae et al.revealed that a 12-helix nucleation
effect can be detected on the use of ACPC and
trans-APC (trans-3-aminopyrrolidine-4-carboxylic acid) as
con-formationally constrained residues, and other b3-acyclic
side-chains [64].The 12-helix is still retained in a
b-heptapeptide with only three cyclically restrained residues
in methanol, whereas five constrained residues are necessary
in water
Interestingly, nucleation of the alternating 10/12-helix
does not require constrained residues; it can be achieved by
using a b2/b3 or b3/b2dipeptidic sequence [37,48].Besides
the local torsional preferences (see above), the reason for
this may be that intrinsically the most stable b-peptide
helical structure is the 10/12-helix, because of the
advanta-geous H-bonding geometry [66]
Although the conformational pool of b-peptides allows polar and nonpolar strand geometries, the propensity to sheet formation in solution can be studied only by the construction of simple hairpin (strand-turn-strand) models
as a result of the complexity of the long-range interactions encountered in sheets.The crucial point here is the synthesis
of the stable turn motif that finally nucleates the pleated sheet structure.One strategy for sheet nucleation is the application of conformationally restricted residues in the centre of the b-peptide chain.An antiparallel sheet-nucle-ating 10-membered ring was synthesized by employing a central L-proline-glycolic acid segment (Fig.8A) [40].The incorporation of a stabilizing 12-membered ring also resulted in an antiparallel polar pleated sheet model that was achieved by using a dinipecotic acid moiety (Fig.8B) [71,72].Another way to nucleate a b-peptide sheet is to take advantage of the 10-membered, H-bond-stabilized turn-forming propensity of the b2/b3or b3/b2dipeptidic sequence known from the 10/12-helix.Seebach et al.demonstrated the feasibility of this approach by using (S)-b2/(S)-b3 residues in the centre of an (R,S)-b2,3peptide chain, thereby creating an antiparallel polar pleated sheet model (Fig.8C) [73,74]
Effect of protecting groups
The studies on b-peptide secondary structures mostly cover chain lengths in the oligomeric region.These relatively short sequences are rather sensitive to the presence or absence of terminating protecting groups.It might be considered an empirical rule in b-peptide foldamer design that removal of the protecting groups from the C and N termini destabilizes the 10/12-helix [48], while the absence of the protection acts
as a stabilizing factor for the 14-helix [37].The best available explanation is that the protonated N-terminus is in an advantageous charge–dipole interaction with the relatively high dipole observed for the 14-helix.This reasoning is supported by experimental observations on the stabilizing effect of the helix macrodipole in water [75]
Conclusions and outlook
The peptide sequences constructed from b-amino acid residues have proved their ability to fold into well-defined secondary structures.These foldamers cover a wide variety
of periodic conformations comprising various helices, polar and nonpolar strands and sheets.The b-peptide backbone with an additional carbon atom provides a well-equipped toolbox with which to fine-tune the folding propensities of the sequences, which includes control of the local torsional interactions, side-chain to backbone interactions, side-chain
to side-chain interactions, and nucleation
As stated in the Introduction, there are a number of reasons why b-amino acid-containing compounds can be of interest to the biochemistry community.We would empha-size the construction of amphiphilic b-peptide helices with antimicrobial activity [7].These foldamers, which have the propensity to form helical bundles [76,77], have opened up a new direction towards artificial tertiary structures.The incorporation of other secondary structural elements will also hopefully result in new complex structures with useful functions [78]
Trang 8The authors’ thanks are due to the Hungarian Research Foundation
(OTKA F-038320, TS-04888) for financial support.
References
1 Venkatraman, J., Shankaramma, S.C & Balaram, P (2001)
Design of folded peptides Chem Rev 101, 3131–3152.
2 Baltzer, L., Nilsson, H.& Nilsson, J.(2001) De novo design of
proteins – What are the rules? Chem Rev 101, 3153–3163.
3 Chan, H.S & Dill, K.A (1996) Comparing folding codes for
proteins and polymers Proteins 24, 335–344.
4.Gellman, S H.(1998) Foldamers: a manifesto.Acc Chem Res 31,
173–180.
5 Steer, D.L., Lew, R.A., Perlmutter, P., Smith, A.I & Aguilar, M.I.
(2002) b-Amino acids: versatile peptidomimetics Curr Med.
Chem 9, 811–822.
6 Frackenpohl, J., Arvidson, P.I., Schreiber, J.V & Seebach, D.
(2001) The outstanding biological stability of b- and c-peptides
toward proteolytic enzymes: An in vitro investigation with fifteen
peptidases Chembiochem 2, 445–455.
7 Porter, E.A., Wang, X., Lee, H., Weisblum, B & Gellman, S.H.
(2000) Non-haemolytic b-amino-acid oligomers Nature 404,
565–565.
8 Steer, D.L., Lew, R.A., Perlmutter, P., Smith, A.I & Aguilar, M.I.
(2002) The use of b-amino acids in the design of protease and
peptidase inhibitors Lett Pept Sci 8, 241–246.
9.Rueping, M , Majahan, Y , Sauer, M.& Seebach, D.(2002)
Cellular uptake studies with b-peptides Chembiochem 3, 257–259.
10.Mu¨ller, A , Schumann, F , Koksch, M.& Sewald, N.(1997)
Synthesis of cyclic RGD-peptides containing b-amino acids Lett.
Pept Sci 4, 275–281.
11 Umezawa, N., Gelman, M.A., Haigis, M.C., Raines, R.T &
Gellman, S.H (2002) Translocation of a b-peptide across cell
membranes J Am Chem Soc 124, 368–369.
12.Miller, S L.(1955) Production of some organic compounds under possible primitive earth conditions J Am Chem Soc 77, 2351–2361.
13 Ehrenfreund, P., Glavin, D.P., Botta, O., Cooper, G & Bada, J.L (2001) Extraterrestrial amino acids in Orgueil and Ivuna: tracing the parent body of Cl type carbonaceous chondrites Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 2138–2141.
14 Konishi, M., Nishio, M., Saitoh, K., Miyaki, T., Oki, T & Kawaguchi, H.(1989) Cispentacin, a new antifungal antibiotic 1.Production, isolation, physicochemical properties and structure.
J Antibiot 42, 1749–1755.
15 Kawabata, K , Inamoto, Y , Sakane, K , Iwamoto, T & Hashimoto, S.(1990) Synthesis and structure determination of FR109615, a new antifungal antibiotic J Antibiot 43, 513–518 16.Fu¨lo¨p, F.(2000) The chemistry of 2-aminocyclopentanecarboxylic acid.In Studies in Natural Product Chemistry (Atta-ur-Rahman., ed.) Vol.22, pp.273–306, Elsevier Science Publishers, New York 17.Knapp, S.(1995) Synthesis of complex nucleoside antibiotics Chem Rev 95, 1859–1876.
18.Cole, D C.(1994) Recent stereoselective synthetic approaches to b-amino acids Tetrahedron 50, 9517–9582.
19.Cardillo, G.& Tomasini, C.(1996) Asymmetric synthesis of b-amino acids and a-substituted b-amino acids Chem Soc Rev.
25, 117–128.
20.Fu¨lo¨p, F.(2001) The chemistry of 2-aminocycloalkanecarboxylic acids Chem Rev 101, 2181–2204.
21 Juaristi, E., (ed.) (1994) Enantioselective synthesis of b-amino acids.Wiley-VCH, New York.
22.Sewald, N.(1996) Stereoselective synthesis of b-amino acids via conjugate addition of nitrogen nucleophiles to a, b-unsaturated esters – Recent advances Amino Acids 11, 397–408.
23.Abele, S.& Seebach, D.(2000) Preparation of achiral and of enantiopure geminally disubstituted b-amino acids for b-peptide synthesis Eur J Org Chem 1–15.
24 Gademann, K., Hintermann, T & Schreiber, J.V (1999) b-pep-tides: Twisting and turning Curr Med Chem 6, 905–925.
Fig 8 b-Peptidic hairpin models (A and B) 10-Membered turns nucleating antiparallel polar sheets taken from [31,64,65]; (C) 12-membered turn nucleating antiparallel polar sheet taken from [62,63].
Trang 925 Marastoni, M., Guerrini, R., Balboni, G., Salvadori, S., Fantin,
G., Fogagnolo, M., Lazarus, L.H & Tomatis, R (1999) Opioid
deltorphin C analogues containing cis- or trans-2- or 3- or
4-aminocyclohexanecarboxylic acid residues Arzneimittel.-Forsch.
49, 6–12.
26.Ojima, I , Lin, S.& Wang, T.(1999) Recent advances in the
medicinal chemistry of taxoids with novel b-amino acid side
chains Curr Med Chem 6, 927–954.
27 Abdel-Magid, A.F., Cohen, J.H & Maryanoff, C.A (1999)
Chemical process synthesis of b-amino acids and esters Curr.
Med Chem 6, 955–970.
28.Scarborough, R M.(1999) Structure-activity relationships of
b-amino acid-containing integrin antagonists Curr Med Chem 6,
971–981.
29.Juaristi, E.& Lopez-Ruiz, H.(1999) Recent advances in the
enantioselective synthesis of b-amino acids Curr Med Chem 6,
983–1004.
30 DeGrado, W.F., Schneider, J.P & Hamuro, Y (1999) The twists
and turns of b-peptides J Pept Res 54, 206–217.
31 Cheng, R.P., Gellman, S.H & DeGrado, W.F (2001) b-Peptides:
from structure to function Chem Rev 101, 3219–3232.
32 Seebach, D.& Matthews, J.L.(1997) B-Peptides: a surprise at
every turn Chem Commun 2015–2225.
33.Banerjee, A.& Balaram, P.(1997) Stereochemistry of peptides and
polypeptides containing omega amino acids Curr Sci India 73,
1067–1077.
34 Hill, D.J., Mio, M.J., Prince, R.B., Hughes, T.S & Moore, J.S.
(2001) A field guide to foldamers Chem Rev 101, 3893–4011.
35 Seebach, D., Overhand, M., Kuhnle, F.N.M., Martinini, B.,
Oberer, L., Hommel, U.& Widmer, H.(1996) b-peptides:
Syn-thesis by Arndt-Eistert homologation with concomitant peptide
coupling.Structure determination by NMR and CD spectroscopy
and by X-ray crystallography.Helical secondary structure of a
b-hexapeptide in solution and its stability towards pepsin Helv.
Chim Acta 79, 913–941.
36 Seebach, D , Gademann, K , Schreiber, J V , Matthews, J L ,
Hintermann, T., Jaun, B., Oberer, L., Hommel, U & Widmer, H.
(1997) ÔMixedÕ b-peptides: a unique helical secondary structure in
solution Helv Chim Acta 80, 2033–2038.
37 Seebach, D , Abele, S , Gademann, K , Guchard, G ,
Hintermann, T , Jaun, B , Matthews, J L & Schreiber, J V.
(1998) b 2 - and b 3 -peptides with proteinaceous side chains:
Syn-thesis and solution structures of constitutional isomers, a novel
helical secondary structure and the influence of solvation and
hydrophobic interactions on folding Helv Chim Acta 81,
932–982.
38 Seebach, D , Schreiber, J V , Abele, S , Daura, X & Gunsteren,
W.F (2000) Structure and conformation of b-oligopeptide
deri-vatives with simple proteinogenic side chains: circular dichroism
and molecular dynamics investigations Helv Chim Acta 83,
34–57.
39 Appella, D H , Christianson, L A , Karle, I L , Powell, D R &
Gellman, S.H (1996) b-Peptide foldamers: robust helix formation
in a new family of b-amino acid oligomers J Am Chem Soc 118,
13071–13072.
40.Krautha¨user, S , Christianson, L A , Powell, D R & Gellman,
S.H (1997) Antiparallel sheet formation in b-peptide foldamers:
effects of b-amino acid substitution on conformational preference.
J Am Chem Soc 119, 11719–11720.
41 Barchi, J J , Huang, X L , Appella, D H , Christianson, L A ,
Durell, A.R & Gellman, S.H (2000) Solution conformations of
helix-forming b-amino acid homooligomers J Am Chem Soc.
122, 2711–2718.
42.Mo¨hle, K., Gu¨nther, R., Thormann, M., Sewald, N & Hofmann,
H.J (1999) Basic conformers in beta-peptides Biopolymers 50,
167–184.
43.Gu¨nther, R.& Hofmann, H.J.(2002) Theoretical prediction of substituent effects on the intrinsic folding properties of b-peptides Helv Chim Acta 85, 2149–2168.
44 Wu, Y.-D & Wang, D.P (1998) Theoretical studies on b-peptide models J Am Chem Soc 120, 13485–13493.
45 Wu, Y.-D & Wang, D.P (1999) Theoretical study on side-chain control of the 14-helix and the 10/12-helix of b-peptides J Am Chem Soc 121, 9352–9362.
46.Alema´n, C.& Leon, S.(2000) Effects of electron correlation and the environment on the conformational preferences of the b-alanine dipeptide J Mol Struct (THEOCHEM) 505, 211–219.
47.Gu¨nther, R.& Hoffman, H -J.(2001) Searching for periodic structures in b-peptides J Phys Chem B 105, 5559–5567.
48 Rueping, M., Schreiber, J.V., Lelais, G., Jaun, B & Seebach, D (2002) Mixed b(2)/b(3)-hexapeptides and b2/b3-nonapeptides folding to (P)-helices with alternating twelve- and ten-membered hydrogen-bonded rings Helv Chim Acta 85, 2577–2593 49.Beke, T , Csizmadia, G.& Perczel, A.(2003) Are b-peptides indeed flexible? J Comp Chem in press.
50 Baron, R., Bakowies, D., Gunsteren, W.F & Daura, X (2002) b-Peptides with different secondary-structure preferences: how different are their conformational spaces? Helv Chim Acta 85, 3872–3882.
51 Appella, D.H., Christianson, L.A., Klein, D.A., Powell, D.R., Hu-ang, X., Barchi, J.J Jr & Gellman, S.H (1997) Residue-based con-trol of helix shape in b-peptide oligomers Nature 387, 381–384.
52 Martinek, T A , To´th, G , Vass, E , Hollo´si, M & Fu¨lo¨p, F.(2002) cis-2-Aminocyclopentanecarboxylic acid oligomers adopt a sheet-like structure: switch from helix to a nonpolar strand Angew Chem Int Ed 41, 1718–1721.
53 Raguse, T.L., Lai, J.R & Gellman, S.H (2002) Evidence that the b-peptide 14-helix is stabilized by b3-residues with side-chain branching adjacent to the b-carbon atom Helv Chim Acta 85, 4154–4164.
54 Hamuro, Y , Schneider, J P & DeGrado, W F (1999) De novo design of antibacterial b-peptides J Am Chem Soc 121, 12200– 12201.
55 Gung, B.W., Zou, D., Stalcup, A.M & Cottrell, C.E (1999) Characterization of a water-soluble, helical b-peptide J Org Chem 64, 2176–2177.
56 Gregorie, F , Wei, S H , Streed, E W , Brameld, K A , Fort, D , Hanely, L.J., Walls, J.D., Goddard, W.A & Roberts, J.D (1998) Conformational equilibria of b-alanine and related compounds as studied by NMR spectroscopy J Am Chem Soc 120, 7537– 7543.
57 Gopi, H N , Roy, R S , Raghothama, S R , Karle, I L &
Balar-am, P.(2002) b-Jairpins generated from hybrid peptide sequences containing both a- and b-amino acids Helv Chim Acta 85, 3313– 3330.
58 Lin, J.-Q., Luo, S.-W & Wu, Y.-D (2002) Theoretical study of sheets formed by b-peptides J Comp Chem 23, 1551–1558.
59 Claridge, T D W , Goodman, J M , Moreno, A , Angus, D , Barker, S.F., Taillefumier, C., Watterson, M.P & Fleet, G.W.J (2001) 10-Helical conformations in oxetane b-amino acid hexa-mers Tetrahedron Lett 42, 4251–4255.
60.Padmanabhan, S & Baldwin, R L (1994) Helix–stabilizing interaction between tyrosine and leucine or valine when the spa-cing is i, i+4 J Mol Biol 241, 706–713.
61.Padmanabhan, S.& Baldwin, R L.(1994) Tests for helix–stabi-lizing interactions between various nonpolar side-chains in alanine-based peptides Protein Sci 3, 1992–97.
62.Guichard, G , Abele, S.& Seebach, D.(1998) Preparation of N-Fmoc-protected b(2)- and b(3)-amino acids and their use as building blocks for the solid-phase synthesis of b-peptides Helv Chim Acta 81, 187–206.
Trang 1063 Etezady-Esfarjani, T., Hilty, C., Wu¨thrich, K., Rueping, M.,
Schreiber, J.& Seebach, D.(2002) NMR-structural
investiga-tions of a b(3)-dodecapeptide with proteinogenic side chains
in methanol and in aqueous solutions Helv Chim Acta 85,
1197–1209.
64 LePlae, P.R., Fisk, J.D., Porter, E.A., Weisblum, B & Gellman,
S.H (2001) Tolerance of acyclic residues in the b-peptide 12-helix:
access to diverse side-chain arrays for biological applications.
J Am Chem Soc 124, 6820–6821.
65 Seebach, D , Mahajan, Y R , Senthilkumar, R , Rueping, M &
Jaun, B (2002) b-Depsipeptides – the effect of a missing and a
weakened hydrogen bond on the stability of the b-peptidic 3 14
-helix Chem Commun 1598–1599.
66 Wu, Y.-D., Lin, J.-Q & Zhao, Y.-L (2002) Theoretical study of
b-peptide models: intrinsic preferences of helical structures Helv.
Chim Acta 85, 3144–3160.
67 Arvidsson, P.I., Rueping, M & Seebach, D (2001) Design,
machine synthesis, and NMR-solution structure of a
b-hepta-peptide forming a salt-bridge stabilised 3(14)-helix in methanol
and in water Chem Commun 649–650.
68 Cheng, R.P & DeGrado, W.F (2001) De novo design of a
monomeric helical b-peptide stabilized by electrostatic
inter-actions J Am Chem Soc 123, 5162–5163.
69 Rueping, M., Jaun, B.& Seebach, D.(2000) NMR structure in
methanol of a b-hexapeptide with a disulfide clamp Chem.
Commun 2267–2268.
70 Seebach, D , Jacobi, A , Rueping, M , Gademann, K , Ernst, M.
& Jaun, B.(2000) Synthesis of b-hexa- and b-heptapeptides
con-taining novel b 2,3 -amino acids with two serine or two cysteine side
chains – CD- and NMR-spectroscopic evidence for 3(14)-helical
secondary structures in water Helv Chim Acta 83, 2115–2140.
71 Chung, Y J , Christianson, L A , Stanger, H E , Powell, D R & Gellman, S.H (1998) A b-peptide reverse turn that promotes hairpin formation J Am Chem Soc 120, 10555–10556.
72 Chung, Y J , Huck, B R , Christianson, L A , Stanger, H E , Krautha¨user, S., Powell, D.R & Gellman, S.H (2000) Stereo-chemical control of hairpin formation in b-peptides containing dinipecotic acid reverse turn segments J Am Chem Soc 122, 3995–4004.
73 Seebach, D., Abele, S., Gademann, K.& Jaun, B.(1999) Pleated sheets and turns of b-peptides with proteinogenic side chains Angew Chem Int Edit 38, 1595–1597.
74 Daura, X., Gademann, K., Scha¨fer, H , Jaun, B , Seebach, D & Gunsteren, W.F (2001) The b-peptide hairpin in solution: con-formational study of a b-hexapeptide in methanol by NMR spectroscopy and MD simulation J Am Chem Soc 123, 2393– 2404.
75 Hart, S A , Bahadoor, A B F , Matthews, E E , Qiu, X J & Schepartz, A.(2003) Helix macrodipole control of b3-peptide 14-helix stability in water J Am Chem Soc 125, 4022–4053.
76 Raguse, T.L., Lai, J.R., LePlae, P.R & Gellman, S.H (2001) Toward b-peptide tertiary structure: self association of
an amphiphilic 14-helix in aqueous solution Org Lett 3, 3963– 3966.
77.Cheng, R P.& DeGrado, W.(2002) Long–range interactions stabilize the fold of a non-natural oligomer J Am Chem Soc.
124, 11564–11565.
78 Arnold, U., Hinderaker, M.P., Nilsson, B.L., Huck, B.R., Gell-man, S.H & Raines, R.T (2002) Protein prosthesis: a semisyn-thetic enzyme with a b-peptide reverse turn J Am Chem Soc.
124, 8522–8523.