In contrast to the gJRL, mJRL are not confined to the Moraceae family but are wide-spread among plants as is illustrated by the isolation and characterization of such lectins from jack fr
Trang 1from the black mulberry (Morus nigra) in complex with
mannose
Anja Rabijns1, Annick Barre2, Els J M Van Damme3, Willy J Peumans3, Camiel J De Ranter1 and Pierre Rouge´2
1 Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry and Medicinal Physicochemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, K U Leuven, Belgium
2 Surfaces Cellulaires et Signalisation chez les Ve´ge´taux, UMR-CNRS 5546, Poˆle de Biotechnologie ve´ge´tale, Castanet-Tolosan, France
3 Department of Molecular Biotechnology, Ghent University, Belgium
During the last decade numerous lectins that are
struc-turally related to jacalin, the Gal⁄ GalNAc-specific
lec-tin from jackfruit (Artocarpus integrifolia) seeds [1],
have been isolated and characterized from plants
belonging to taxonomically distant families [2–13] At
present, jacalin-related lectins are subdivided on the
basis of their apparent monosaccharide-binding
speci-ficity in Gal-specific (gJRL) and Man-specific
jacalin-related lectins (mJRL) Hitherto, gJRL have been
identified in only a few species of the family Moraceae
such as Osage orange (Maclura pomifera) (MPA), jack
fruit (Artocarpus integrefolia) (jacalin) and a few other
Artocarpus species, and in black mulberry (Morus nigra) (MornigaG) In contrast to the gJRL, mJRL are not confined to the Moraceae family but are wide-spread among plants as is illustrated by the isolation and characterization of such lectins from jack fruit (artocarpin) and mulberry (MornigaM), banana (Musa acuminata; Musaceae), hedge bindweed (Calystegia sepium; Convolvulaceae), bindweed (Convolvulus arven-sis; Convolvulaceae), Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus; Asteraceae), Parkia platycephala (Fabaceae: Mimosoideae subfamily), Japanese chestnut (Castanea crenata; Fagaceae), rice (Oryza sativa; Poaceae) and
Keywords
carbohydrate-binding site; jacalin-related
lectin; mannose; Morus nigra; quaternary
association
Correspondence
P Rouge´, Surfaces Cellulaires et
Signalisation chez les Ve´ge´taux, UMR-CNRS
5546, Poˆle de Biotechnologie ve´ge´tale, 24
Chemin de Borde Rouge, 31326
Castanet-Tolosan, France
Fax: +33 05 62 19 35 02
E-mail: rouge@scsv.ups-tlse.fr
(Received 22 March 2005, revised 25 April
2005, accepted 31 May 2005)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04801.x
The structures of MornigaM and the MornigaM–mannose complex have been determined at 1.8 A˚ and 2.0 A˚ resolution, respectively Both struc-tures adopt the typical b-prism motif found in other jacalin-related lectins and their tetrameric assembly closely resembles that of jacalin The carbo-hydrate-binding cavity of MornigaM readily binds mannose No major structural rearrangements can be observed in MornigaM upon binding of mannose These results allow corroboration of the structure–function rela-tionships within the small group of Moraceae lectins
Abbreviations
BanLec, banana (Musa acuminata) lectin; Calsepa, Calystegia sepium (hedge bindweed) agglutinin; Conarva, Convolvulus arvensis
(bindweed) agglutinin; Heltuba, Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke) agglutinin; JRL, jacalin-related lectin; gJRL, galactose-specific jacalin-related lectin; mJRL, mannose-specific jacalin-related lectin; MPA, Maclura pomifera (Osage orange) agglutinin; MornigaG, Gal-specific Morus nigra (black mulberry) agglutinin; MornigaM, Man-specific Morus nigra (black mulberry) agglutinin; Orysata, rice (Oryza sativa) agglutinin.
Trang 2the true fern Phlebodium aureum (Polypodiaceae) The
subdivision in gJRL and mJRL was initially proposed
on the basis of the nominal specificity towards
mono-saccharides but is also in perfect agreement with a
classification of the JRL according to the overall
struc-ture of their corresponding genes More recent
specific-ity studies indicated that at least within the family
Moraceae the differences in specificity are not so a
clear-cut It has been demonstrated, indeed, that the
presumed T-antigen⁄ GalNac-specific jacalin behaves as
a polyspecific lectin capable of interacting) albeit with
a (much) lower affinity) with many other sugars
including Man, Gluc, Neu5Ac or MurNAc [14,15] In
this respect, the mJRL isolated from other plants
families such as, e.g Calsepa from Calystegia sepium
(Convolvulaceae) and Heltuba from Helianthus
tubero-sus (Asteraceae), which exhibit an exclusive specificity
towards mannose and do not interact with unrelated
sugars like Gal or GalNAc [7,16] differ from jacalin
However, these available data on the specificity of JRL
offer no explanation for the dramatic differences in the
agglutination activity between the mJRL of different
origin All mJRL studied thus far are very weak
agglu-tinins as compared to the gJRL (more than three
orders of magnitude less potent) except MornigaM
which is nearly as potent as jacalin Because one can
reasonably assume that the exceptionally high
agglu-tinating activity of MornigaM is intimately linked to
its sugar binding properties the three-dimensional
structure of MornigaM in complex with a simple sugar
was determined to decipher the structural features
responsible for the unusual enhanced activity of this
Moraceae lectin
Results
Quality and overall view of the structure
The final model obtained for uncomplexed MornigaM
converged to an R-factor of 19.0% and an R-free
value of 21.0% (Table 1) It comprises four MornigaM
subunits with 154 out of the total 161 amino acid
resi-dues, 575 water molecules, three acetate molecules,
four glycerol molecules and one sulfate molecule The
first seven N-terminal residues are not seen in the
elec-tron density map and are not included in the model
The model has a good geometry and has r.m.s
devia-tions from ideal bond lengths and angles of 0.005 A˚
and 1.45, respectively All residues were found in the
most favoured (85.7%) and generously allowed regions
(14.3%) of the Ramachandran plot None of the
resi-dues was found in the disallowed regions The average
temperature factor for the main-chain and side-chain
atoms are 17.6 A˚2 and 19.9 A˚2, respectively In total
12 cis-peptide bonds were found in the structure (three per monomer: Leu21, Pro85 and Pro123) Further refinement statistics are given in Table 1 for both the uncomplexed and Man-complexed MornigaM
The MornigaM protomer exhibits the b-prism fold typically found in the JRL family (Fig 1) It consists
of three four-stranded b-sheets forming three Greek keys motifs: 1 (b1,b2,b11,b12), 2 (b3, b4, b5,b6) and
3 (b7,b8,b9b10) (Fig 2A,B) Although the single-chain MornigaM protomer definitely differs from jacalin by the lack of a proteolytic cleavage of its protomer into
an a and a b chain, it nicely superimposes on the simi-larly folded two-chain jacalin protomer and other single-chain Man-specific protomers of Heltuba or artocarpin
MornigaM adopts a homotetrameric quaternary arrangement very similar to that of many other JRL like jacalin [1], MPA [17] and artocarpin [18] (Fig 2C,D) All four monomers within the tetramer superimpose well with r.m.s differences ranging between 0.20 A˚ and 0.47 A˚ The largest structural dif-ference observed between the four protomers is the different conformation of loop 99–107 (L2) in the A protomer as compared to its conformation in the B, C and D protomers of the tetramer This loop forms the roof of the sugar binding pocket of MornigaM and hence its different orientation might be related
to the observed lack of binding of mannose in the A
Table 1 Crystallographic data for MornigaM and the MornigaM– Man complex.
MornigaM– Man complex Data collection:
Resolution limit (A ˚ ) 1.8 (1.83–1.80) 2.0 (2.03–2.00)
Unique reflections 100939 (5072) 74409 (3763) Completeness of all data (%) 98.4 (99.7) 99.1 (100.0) Completeness of
data (%) (I > 2 r)
90.6 (70.4) 89.8 (71.7)
Refinement:
Atoms in protein ⁄ solvent 4640 ⁄ 616 4640 ⁄ 583 Mean B in protein⁄ solvent (A˚ 2 ) 18.7 ⁄ 27.6 20.4⁄ 29.0 r.m.s.d bond lengths (A ˚ ) 0.005 0.005
Trang 3protomer (see below) Furthermore, a minor structural
heterogeneity can be observed in the N-terminal region
of the different protomers Like jacalin, the MornigaM
homotetramer exhibits a strong electronegative surface
(Fig 2E,F) The carbohydrate-binding cavities are
electronegatively charged due to the Asp153 residue
that occupies the centre of the cavity
The carbohydrate-binding site
Comparison of the backbone atoms of the
uncom-plexed and Man-complexed MornigaM structures
shows that no significant structural rearrangements
occur upon mannose binding The r.m.s deviation
between both structures is only 0.11 A˚, based on the
superposition of the Ca atoms Except for protomer
A, a clear density is seen for the bound mannose
mole-cule in the carbohydrate-binding site of protomers B,
C and D which is composed of three convergent loops
connecting strands b1 to b1 (loop 1), b7 to b8 (loop 2)
and b11 to b12 (loop 3), located at the top of the
pro-tomers (Fig 3A) Man is specifically anchored to
resi-dues Gly27 (loop 1), Phe150-Val151-Asp153 (loop 3)
by a network of 8 hydrogen bonds (Table 2) with
oxy-gens O3, O4, O5 and O6, respectively (Fig 3B)
Depending on the protomer, Gly27N interacts
(pro-tomers C and D) or does not interact (protomer B)
with O4 of Man An additional stacking between the
aromatic ring of Phe150 and the pyranose ring of Man
reinforces the interaction of MornigaM with the sugar
A very similar H-bond network was observed in the
previously X-ray solved MeMan–artocarpin [18] and
Man–Heltuba [19] complexes Superposing the Ca of
the amino acid residues forming the monosaccharide-binding site of MornigaM with those of Heltuba and artocarpin yielded r.m.s values of 0.263 A˚ and 0.142 A˚, respectively, thus indicating that all these resi-dues occupy very similar positions in all the mJRL In fact, rather close r.m.s of 0.432 A˚ and 0.362 A˚ were measured with the corresponding amino acid residues forming the Gal⁄ GalNAc-binding site of jacalin (PDB code 1JAC) and MPA (PDB code 1JOT), suggesting a similar topology for the monosaccharide-binding site
of the gJRL that apparently accounts for the promis-cuous character of this gJRL
The size and shape of the carbohydrate-binding site
of MornigaM and other JRL essentially depends on both the conformation of the three loops that delineate the binding cavity and the presence therein of amino acid residues with bulky side chains The carbohy-drate-binding cavity of MornigaM is largely widened between loops 2 and 3 but its opening on the other side, between loops 1 and 2, is strongly restricted by the side chain of Lys106 which protrudes from loop 2
to close up the cavity These structural discrepancies
of the carbohydrate-binding cavity should have a pro-found influence on the type of oligosaccharides that fit
in the site of the JRL
Discussion
Resolution of the three-dimensional structure of apo MornigM X-ray at 1.8 A˚ revealed a homotetrameric organization similar to those found for jacalin and all Moraceae JRL studied thus far but not for any other JRL Resolution of the structure of a MornigaM⁄ Man
Fig 1 Sequence and structure comparison of MornigaM to other jacalin-related lectins (A) Sequence alignment of MornigaM with jacalin as
a member of the gJRL group and Heltuba and artocarpin as members of the mJRL group Identical residues are coloured white with a black background and similar residues are coloured black and open boxed The amino acid residues forming the monosaccharide-binding site are indicated by stars b-Strands forming the Greek keys 1 (b1,b2,b11,b12), 2 (b3-b6) and 3 (b7-b10) of jacalin (upper arrows) and MornigaM (lower arrows) protomers are indicated.
Trang 4complex at 2.0 A˚ further demonstrated that a network
of seven or eight hydrogen bonds anchors O3, O4, O5
and O6 of Man to residues Gly27, Phe150, Val151 and
Asp153 (all of which protrude from loops 1 and 2 that
delineate the carbohydrate-binding cavity of the lectin
protomer) A closer examination of the structure of
the binding sites indicates that specificity of the Mora-ceae lectins is primarily determined by the orientation
of the side chains of the four amino acid residues resi-dues that form the monosaccharide-binding site of the lectins An r.m.s of only 0.2–0.4 A˚ was measured when superimposing the Ca of these four residues from different Moraceae JRL, which implies that there
is very little structural tolerance at the level of their respective monosaccharide-binding sites This holds true particularly for the Gly residue, which is either free at the N-terminus of the large polypeptide of the two-chain gJRL (in casu jacalin, MPA and MornigaG)
or located around position 10–20 in the uncleaved pro-tomer of the mJRL (in casu MornigaM and artocar-pin) Due to this strictly conserved orientation the Gly residue of both types of Moraceae JRL can interact with both the equatorial (Gal⁄ GalNAc) and axial (Man⁄ Glc) O4 of monosaccharides It should be emphasized, however, that in spite of this particular structural feature jacalin exhibits a preferential specific-ity for Gal, GalNAc and the T antigen, and binds other sugars with a much lower affinity
As with most other plant lectins the reactivity of MornigaM and other JRL is not limited to simple sugars but also extends to disaccharides and more complex oligosaccharides [20–22] Structural analyses indicated that the carbohydrate-binding cavity of MornigaM is sufficiently extended to accommodate more bulky saccharides and that the atomic structure
of this cavity accounts for the oligosaccharide-bind-ing specificity of each of these lectins It is worth mentioning in this context that loop 2, which forms the roof of the carbohydrate-binding cavity in all the
N N
β5
β4 β2 β12
β11 β8 β3 β6
β9 β7 β10 β1
Fig 2 Structure and surface analysis of MornigaM and jacalin (A,
B) Ribbon diagrams showing the arrangement of the 12 b-strands
of the MornigaM protomer in three Greek keys 1, 2 and 3 coloured
orange (strands b1, b2, b11, b12), blue (strands b3-b6) and pink
(strands b7-b10), respectively N and C indicate the N- and
C-ter-mini of the MornigaM polypeptide, respectively, and the stars
indi-cate the location of the monosaccharide-binding site (C, D)
Tetrameric arrangement of the protomers of MornigaM (C) and
jac-alin (D) The b-chains of the jacjac-alin protomers are coloured cyan.
The carbohydrate-binding sites are indicated by stars (E, F)
Mole-cular surface of the MornigaM (E) and jacalin (F) tetramers showing
the distribution of the electrostatic potentials The negative
poten-tial is coloured red and displayed at )5 kT level, the positive
poten-tial is colored blue and displayed at +5 kT level (1 kT ¼ 0.6 kcals).
Neutral surfaces are white The electrostatic potentials were
calcu-lated and displayed with GRASP [37].
Fig 3 The carbohydrate-binding site of MornigaM and other jac-alin-related lectins (A) Ribbon diagram of the carbohydrate-binding site of MornigaM showing the three loops L1 (grey), L2 (pale grey) and L3 (mid grey) forming the carbohydrate-binding cavity Man-nose (in grey ball-and-sticks) occupies the monosaccharide-binding site (B) Network of hydrogen bonds (dashes) anchoring Man to the amino acid residues of the monosaccharide-binding site of MornigaM.
Trang 5Moraceae JRL plays a key role in the delineation of
the size and shape of the binding site The presence
in loop 2 of bulky amino acid residues has
appar-ently no effect on the accessibility of
monosaccha-rides but could dramatically reduce the accessibility
of the carbohydrate-binding cavity for
oligosaccha-rides This observation is in good agreement with
the recent suggestion (based on a database analysis
of jacalin-like lectins) that loop 2 is a very important
structural feature in determining the
oligosaccharide-binding specificity of JRL [23]
Experimental procedures
Isolation of the lectin
MornigaM was isolated from mulberry (Morus nigra) bark
by affinity chromatography on Man-Sepharose 4B, as
pre-viously described [11] Three successive rounds of affinity
chromatography were performed to ensure the purity of the
Man-specific lectin The lectin preparation gave a single
protein band when checked by SDS⁄ PAGE
Crystallization and structure resolution
Crystals suitable for diffraction analysis were grown from a
55% saturated ammonium sulfate solution containing 0.1 m
imidazole buffer pH 7.0 as described elsewhere [24]
Subse-quently, crystals of the complex between MornigaM and
Man were prepared by soaking an uncomplexed MornigaM
crystal with a 50 mm Man solution for approximately 48 h
Both the uncomplexed and complexed crystals could be
cryoprotected by soaking the crystals in the original
crystal-lization condition with 25% glycerol for 30 s Soaking
experiments performed under similar conditions with Gal
remained unsuccessful
Data collection with cryo-cooling at 100 K was carried
out on the native and soaked crystals at the X11 beam line
of the DESY synchrotron in Hamburg All data processing
was done using denzo and scalepack [25] The space group was assigned to be P65 with a¼ b ¼ 110.7, c ¼ 159.2 A˚ Checking of the diffraction data at the twin server [26] showed that all measured crystals were partially mero-hedrally twinned with variable twin fractions ranging from 11% to 35% The twin fractions for the data sets used for final structure determination of MornigaM and of MornigaM–Man were 14.5% and 18.7%, respectively Both data sets were detwinned using the algorithm described by Yeates [26], yielding data sets in which all reflections had their twin component removed Data collection statistics for both data sets are given in Table 1
The phase problem for the MornigaM structure was solved by the molecular replacement technique in x-plor [27] using the detwinned data The coordinates of half a jacalin molecule (chains A and C, PDB code 1JAC) were used as a search model for the uncomplexed MornigaM structure Two dimers were easily found and combining them into a tetramer gave an R factor of 46% (R-free 47%) after initial rigid body refinement to 3 A˚ Based on a calculated Matthews coefficient of 2.35 A˚3ÆDa)1[28], it was assumed that the asymmetric unit consisted of eight mono-mers However, in the molecular replacement search only a single tetramer was found The corresponding solvent con-tent for the crystals is 73%
Refinement was performed by the cns package [29] using torsional angle dynamics and individual B-factor refine-ment A randomly selected 10% of the data sets were set aside for cross-validation using the R-free value Bulk sol-vent correction was used Solsol-vent molecules were progres-sively added when they met the following requirements: (a)
a minimum 3 r peak had to be present in the |Fobs|-|Fcalc| difference map; (b) a peak had to be visible in the 2|Fobs
|-|Fcalc| map; (c) during refinement the B-value for the water molecule should not exceed 60 A˚2; and (d) the water mole-cule had to be stabilized by hydrogen bonding Refinement was always performed against detwinned data; different twin fractions were tested and used to optimize the refine-ment Eventually twin fractions of 11.60% and 14.74%
Table 2 List of hydrogen bonds connecting the mannose to the different residues of the MornigaM tetramer.
Trang 6gave the best result for the MornigaM and the MornigaM–
Man structure refinement, respectively Visual inspection
and model building were done in O [30] Electron and
dif-ference density maps were used to confirm the presence of
the mannose molecule in the structure of the MornigaM–
Man complex To accurately fit the electron density map
several amino acids in primary sequence deposited in the
SWISS-PROT database (accession number Q8LGR3) had
to be changed These changes include V17I, P100A and
V157F The observed differences are probably due to the
(documented) heterogeneity of MornigaM The presence of
the replaced amino acid residues, the water molecules and
the ions were all checked in simulated annealing omit maps
Assessment of the quality of the coordinates was done with
the programs procheck [31] and moleman [32] The
coordinates and structure factors of the MornigaM and
the MornigaM–Man structure have been deposited in the
Protein Data Bank [33] with the codes 1XXQ and 1XXR,
respectively Ribbon diagrams of MornigaM and other
JRL were drawn with molscript [34] and rendered with
bobscript[35] and raster3d [36]
Molecular surface analysis
Molecular surface and electrostatic potentials were
calcula-ted and displayed with grasp using the parse3 parameters
[37] The solvent probe radius used for molecular surfaces
was 1.4 A˚ and a standard 2.0 A˚ Stern layer was used to
exclude ions from the molecular surface [38] The inner and
outer dielectric constants applied to the protein and the
sol-vent were, respectively, fixed at 4.0 and 80.0, and the
cal-culations were performed keeping a salt concentration of
0.145 m No even distribution of the net negative charge of
the carboxylic group of negatively charged residues was
performed between their two oxygen atoms prior to the
cal-culations Surface topology of the carbohydrate-binding
sites was rendered and analysed with pymol (W.L DeLano,
http://www.pymol.org)
Sequence comparison and alignment
The program espript [39] was used to compare the amino
acid sequence of MornigaM to other JRL sequences
(Fig 1A) Multiple amino acid sequence alignments were
based on clustal x [40]
Acknowledgements
A.R is a Postdoctoral Research Fellows of the Fund
for Scientific Research-Flanders (Belgium) The
finan-cial support of CNRS is gratefully acknowledged (A.B
and P.R.) We thank the beam line scientists at DESY
for technical support and the European Union for
sup-port of the work at EMBL Hamburg through the
HCMP to Large Installations Project, contract no CHGE-CT93-0040
References
1 Sankaranarayanan R, Sekar K, Banerjee R, Sharma V, Surolia A & Vijayan M (1996) A novel mode of carbo-hydrate recognition in jacalin, a Moraceae plant lectin with a b-prism fold Nat Struct Biol 3, 596–603
2 Bausch JN & Poretz RD (1977) Purification and proper-ties of the hemagglutinin from Maclura pomifera seeds Biochemistry 16, 5790–5794
3 Moreira RA & Ainouz IL (1981) Lectins from seeds of jack fruit (Artocarpus integrifolia L.): isolation and puri-fication of two isolectins from the albumin fraction Biol Plant (Praha) 23, 186–192
4 Van Damme EJM, Barre A, Verhaert P, Rouge´ P & Peumans WJ (1996) Molecular cloning of the mitogenic mannose⁄ maltose-specific rhizome lectin from Calyste-gia sepium FEBS Lett 397, 352–356
5 Peumans WJ, Zhang W, Barre A, Houles-Astoul C, Balint-Kurti P, Rovira P, Rouge´ P, May GD, Van Leuven F, Truffa-Bachi P & Van Damme EJM (2000) Fruit-specific lectins from banana and plantain Planta
211, 546–554
6 Geshi N & Brandt A (1998) Two jasmonate-inducible myrosinase-binding proteins from Brassica napus L seedlings with homology to jacalin Planta 204, 295–304
7 Van Damme EJM, Barre A, Mazard A-M, Verhaert P, Horman A, Debray H, Rouge´ P & Peumans WJ (1999) Characterization and molecular cloning of the lectin from Helianthus tuberosus Eur J Biochem 259, 135–142
8 Zhang W, Peumans WJ, Barre A, Houles-Astoul C, Rovira P, Rouge´ P, Proost P, Truffa-Bachi P, Jalali HA
& Van Damme EJM (2000) Isolation and characteri-zation of a jacalin-related mannose-binding lectin from salt-stressed rice (Oryza sativa) Plants Planta 210, 970– 978
9 Nomura K, Nakamura S, Fujitake M & Nakanishi T (2000) Complete amino acid sequence of Japanese chest-nut agglutinin Biochem Biophys Res Commun 276, 23– 28
10 Mann K, Farias CMSA, Gallego Del Sol F, Santos CF, Grangeiro TB, Nagano CS, Cavada BS & Calvete JJ (2001) The amino-acid sequence of the glucose⁄ man-nose-specific lectin isolated from Parkia platycephala seeds reveals three tandemly arranged jacalin-related domains Eur J Biochem 268, 4414–4422
11 Van Damme EJM, Hu J, Barre A, Houle`s-Astoul C, Rouge´ P, Proost P & Peumans WJ (2002) Two distinct jacalin-related lectins with a different specificity and subcellular location are major vegetative storage pro-teins in the bark of the mulberry tree Plant Physiol
130, 757–769
Trang 712 Yagi F, Iwaya T, Haraguchi T & Goldstein IJ (2002)
The lectin from leaves of Japanese cycad, Cycas revoluta
Thunb (gymnosperm) is a member of the jacalin-related
family Eur J Biochem 269, 4335–4341
13 Tateno H, Winter HC, Petryniak J & Goldstein IJ (2003)
Purification, characterization, molecular cloning, and
expression of novel members of jacalin-related lectins
from rhizomes of the true fern Phlebodium aureum (L)
J Smith (Polypodiaceae) J Biol Chem 278, 10891–10899
14 Bourne Y, Houle`s Astoul C, Zamboni V, Peumans WJ,
Menu-Bouaouiche L, Van Damme EJM, Barre A &
Rouge´ P (2002) Structural basis for the unusual
carbo-hydrate-binding specificity of jacalin towards galactose
and mannose Biochem J 364, 173–179
15 Jeyaprakash AA, Jayashree G, Mahanta SK,
Swami-nathan CP, Sekar K, Surolia A & Vijayan M (2005)
Structural basis for the energetics of jacalin–sugar
interactions: promiscuity versus specificity J Mol Biol
347, 181–188
16 Peumans WJ, Winter HC, Bemer V, Van Leuven F,
Goldstein IJ, Truffa-Bachi P & Van Damme EJM
(1997) Isolation of a novel plant lectin with an unusual
specificity from Calystegia sepium Glycoconjugate J 14,
259–265
17 Lee X, Thompson A, Zhang Z, Ton-That H,
Biester-feldt J, Ogata C, Xu L, Johnston AZ & Young NM
(1998) Structure of the complex of Maclura pomifera
agglutinin and the T-antigen disaccharide,
Galb1,3Gal-NAc J Biol Chem 273, 6312–6318
18 Pratap JV, Arockia Jeyaprakash A, Geetha Rani P,
Se-kar K, Surolia A & Vijayan M (2002) Crystal structures
of artocarpin, a Moraceae lectin with mannose
specifi-city, and its complex with methyl-a-d-mannose:
implica-tions to the generation of carbohydrate specificity
J Mol Biol 317, 237–247
19 Bourne Y, Zamboni V, Barre A, Peumans WJ, Van
Damme EJM & Rouge´ P (1999) Helianthus tuberosus
lectin, the crystal structure reveals a widespread scaffold
for mannose-binding lectins Structure Fold Des 7,
1473–1482
20 Rani PG, Bachhawat K, Misquith S & Surolia A (1999)
Thermodynamic studies of saccharide binding to
arto-carpin, a B-cell mitogen, reveals the extended nature of
its interaction with mannotriose
[3,6-Di-O-(a-d-manno-pyranosyl)-d-mannose] J Biol Chem 274, 29694–29698
21 Rani PG, Bachhawat K, Reddy GB, Oscarson S &
Surolia A (2000) Isothermal titration calorimetric
studies on the binding of deoxytrimannose derivatives
with artocarpin: implications for a deep-seated
combining site in lectins Biochemistry 39, 10755–
10760
22 Wu AM, Wu JH, Singh T, Chu K-C, Peumans WJ,
Rouge´ P & Van Damme EJM (2004) A novel lectin
(MornigaM) from mulberry (Morus nigra) bark
recog-nizes oligomannosyl residues N-glycans J Biomed Sci
11, 874–885
23 Raval S, Gowda SB, Singh DD & Chandra NR (2004)
A database analysis of¢jacalin-like¢ lectins: sequence-structure-function relationships Glycobiology 14, 1247– 1263
24 Rabijns A, Verboven C, Novoa de Armas H, Van Damme EJM, Peumans WJ & De Ranter CJ (2001) The crystals of a mannose-specific jacalin-related lectin from Morus nigraare merohedrally twinned Acta Crystallogr D57, 609–611
25 Otwinowski Z & Minor W (1997) Processing of x-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode Methods Enzymol 276, 307–326
26 Yeates TO (1997) Detecting and overcoming crystal twinning Methods Enzymol 276, 344–358
27 Bru¨nger AT (1992) X-PLOR, Version 3.1 A Systemn for X-Ray Crystallography and NMR Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
28 Matthews BW (1974) Determination of molecular weight from protein crystals J Mol Biol 82, 513–526
29 Bru¨nger AT, Adams PD, Clore GM, Delano WL, Gros
P, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Jiang JS, Kuszewski J, Nilges
M, Pannu NS, Read RJ, Rice LM, Simonson T & Warren GL (1998) Crystallography & NMR system: a new software suite for macromolecular structure deter-mination Acta Crystallogr D54, 905–921
30 Jones TA, Zhou JY, Cowtan S & Kjelgaard M (1991) Improved methods for building protein models in elec-tron density maps and the location of errors in these models Acta Crystallogr A47, 110–119
31 Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS & Thornton
JM (1993) PROCHECK: a program to check the stereo-chemical quality of protein structures J Appl Crystal-logr 26, 283–291
32 Kleywegt GJ & Jones TA (1997) Model building and refinement practice Methods Enzymol 277, 208–230
33 Bernstein FC, Koetzel TF, Williams GJB, Meyer EF, Brice MD, Rodgers JR, Kennard O, Shimanouchi T & Tasumi M (1977) The protein data bank: a computer based archival file for macromolecular structures J Mol Biol 112, 535–542
34 Kraulis PJ (1991) MolScript: a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures
J Appl Crystallogr 24, 946–950
35 Esnouf RM (1997) An extensively modified version of Molscript that includes greatly enhanced coloring capa-bilities J Mol Graphics 15, 132–134
36 Merrit EA & Bacon DJ (1997) Raster3D photorealistic molecular graphics Methods Enzymol 277, 505–524
37 Nicholls A, Sharp KA & Honig B (1991) Protein fold-ing and association: Insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons Proteins Struc Func Genet 11, 281–296
Trang 838 Gilson MK & Honing BH (1987) Calculation of
electro-static potential in an enzyme active site Nature 330, 84–
86
39 Gouet P, Courcelle E, Stuart DI & Metoz F (1999)
ESPript: analysis of multiple sequence alignments in
PostScript Bioinformatics 15, 305–308
40 Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F
& Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL–X windows inter-face: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tool Nucleic Acids Res 15, 4876–4882