Computational analysis of glycan conformation with pro-longed simulation periods in vacuo and in a solvent box revealed two main effects: backfolding of the a1–6 arm and stacking of the b
Trang 1Determination of modulation of ligand properties of synthetic
complex-type biantennary N-glycans by introduction of bisecting GlcNAc in silico , in vitro and in vivo
Sabine Andre´1, Carlo Unverzagt2,*, Shuji Kojima3, Martin Frank4, Joachim Seifert2,†, Christian Fink5, Klaus Kayser6, Claus-Wilhelm von der Lieth4and Hans-Joachim Gabius1
1
Institut fu¨r Physiologische Chemie, Tiera¨rztliche Fakulta¨t, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universita¨t Mu¨nchen, Germany;2Institut fu¨r Organische Chemie und Biochemie, Technische Universita¨t Mu¨nchen, Garching, Germany;3Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tokyo University of Science, Japan;4Zentrale Spektroskopie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany;
5 Radiologische Diagnostik und Therapie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany; 6 Institut fu¨r Pathologie, Charite´, Humboldt Universita¨t, Berlin, Germany
We have investigated the consequences of introducing
a bisecting GlcNAc moiety into biantennary N-glycans
Computational analysis of glycan conformation with
pro-longed simulation periods in vacuo and in a solvent box
revealed two main effects: backfolding of the a1–6 arm and
stacking of the bisecting GlcNAc and the neighboring Man/
GlcNAc residues of both antennae.Chemoenzymatic
syn-thesis produced the bisecting biantennary decasaccharide
N-glycan and its a2–3(6)-sialylated variants.They were
conjugated to BSA to probe the ligand properties of
N-glycans with bisecting GlcNAc.To assess affinity
altera-tions in glycan binding to receptors, testing was performed
with purified lectins, cultured cells, tissue sections and
ani-mals.The panel of lectins, including an
adhesion/growth-regulatory galectin, revealed up to a sixfold difference in
affinity constants for these neoglycoproteins relative to data
on the unsubstituted glycans reported previously [Andre´, S ,
Unverzagt, C , Kojima, S , Dong, X , Fink, C , Kayser, K &
Gabius, H.-J (1997) Bioconjugate Chem 8, 845–855].The enhanced affinity for galectin-1 is in accord with the increased percentage of cell positivity in cytofluorimetric and histochemical analysis of carbohydrate-dependent binding
of labeled neoglycoproteins to cultured tumor cells and routinely processed lung cancer sections.Intravenous injec-tion of iodinated neoglycoproteins carrying galactose-ter-minated N-glycans into mice revealed the highest uptake in liver and spleen for the bisecting compound compared with the unsubstituted or core-fucosylated N-glycans.Thus, this substitution modulates ligand properties in interactions with lectins, a key finding of this report.Synthetic glycan tailoring provides a versatile approach to the preparation of newly substituted glycans with favorable ligand properties for medical applications
Keywords: bisecting GlcNAc; drug targeting; lectin; neo-glycoprotein; tumor imaging
A major challenge in the post-genomic era is the
functional analysis of post-translational protein
modifica-tions leading to medical applicamodifica-tions.With about two
thirds of eukaryotic protein sequences reported to harbor the N-glycosylation sequon, this type of modification is typical of membrane and secretory proteins [1].The complex enzymatic machinery located in the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi network, representing a notable investment in terms of genomic coding capacity, is known
to produce a large variety of N-glycans [2,3].These two aspects, i.e frequent protein glycosylation and large panel
of glycosyltransferases, suggest a nonrandom, albeit not template-driven, synthesis with a strong impact on cellular activities [3,4].The glycan chains produced, referred to as the glycomic profile, reflect cellular parameters such as differentiation and disease processes [3,5].Current efforts are directed to relating distinct glycan sequence motifs to key effector mechanisms at the cellular level.In this context our study focuses on defining the role of the bisecting GlcNAc residue
A key regulatory step in N-glycan processing is the addition of a b1–4-linked GlcNAc residue to the central b-mannose unit of the core pentasaccharide.This reaction
is catalyzed by N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (EC 2.4.1.144; GnT-III) placing this GlcNAc residue (Fig.1, bottom panel) between the a1–3 and a1–6 arms,
Correspondence to S.Andre´, Institut fu¨r Physiologische Chemie,
Tiera¨rztliche Fakulta¨t, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universita¨t Mu¨nchen,
Veterina¨rstr.13, 80539 Mu¨nchen, Germany.
Fax: + 49 89 2180 2508, Tel.: + 49 89 2180 2290,
E-mail: Sabine.Andre@lmu.de
Abbreviations: E-PHA, erythroagglutinating phytohemagglutinin;
GnT-III, N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III; MD, molecular
dynamics.
Enzymes: N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (EC 2.4.1.144;
GnT-III).
*Present address: Bioorganische Chemie, Geba¨ude NW1, Universita¨t
Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany.
Present address: 3 Hi-Tech Court, Brisbane Technology Park,
Eight Mile Plains, Brisbane, QLD 4113, Australia.
Dedication: dedicated to and in thankful commemoration of Professor
F.Cramer who died recently three months before his 80th birthday.
(Received 25 September 2003, revised 28 October 2003,
accepted 6 November 2003)
Trang 2which extend from the core pentasaccharide [2].The
introduction of a bisecting GlcNAc residue will probably
perturb conformational aspects proximal and also distal to
its position in the glycan chain.Evidence has been provided
for a shift of the conformational equilibrium of the torsional
angle x of the C5–C6 bond of the a1–6 linkage between the
two positions around 180 and)60 to the 180 position
for the biantennary complex-type N-glycan and to the)60
position for the hybrid-type N-glycan [6–11].Next, in the
presence of chain elongation beyond the core
pentasaccha-ride (but not in its absence), the a1–3 linkage becomes
considerably more restrained than in the N-glycan without a
bisecting GlcNAc unit [12–14].In summary, these reports of
NMR experiments and molecular modeling intimate that
the bisecting GlcNAc acts like a wedge with implications for
the shape of the N-glycan.The occurrence of distinct
alterations in shape induced by this substitution prompted
us to examine the ligand properties of the substituted
N-glycans in detail.Undoubtedly, this work would gain
substantial relevance and importance, if biological effects
were known associated with cellular expression of this
substitution
Indeed, the second premise for our study was provided
by respective reports.The applied methods included up-regulation of GnT-III activity, studies on normal or tumor cells with natural or increased GnT-III activity, ectopic GnT-III expression, and generation of GnT-III-deficient mice.In detail, the mutant phenotype of LEC10 CHO cells displaying resistance to ricin was attributed to induction of GnT-III activity [15,16].Transcriptional up-regulation of GnT-III gene expression by forskolin and thus increased production of N-glycans with bisecting GlcNAc led to the decreased cell surface presence of lysosomal-associated membrane glycoprotein-1 and c-glutamyltrans-peptidase [17].This exemplary result links the bisecting motif to intracellular routing.Regarding tumors, GnT-III was markedly increased in the preneoplastic stage of rat (but not mouse) liver carcinogenesis, the blast crisis of chronic myelogenous leukemia, and pediatric brain tumors [18].The bisecting GlcNAc then makes its presence felt in tumor progression.This process can apparently be influenced nonuniformly, as attested by analysis of different cell types GnT-III overexpression yielded suppression of lung meta-stasis for mouse B16 melanoma cells, increased adhesivity
Fig 1 Neoglycoproteins with BSA as carrier
for the test panel of six complex-type
bianten-nary N-glycans The upper part shows the
structures of the biantennary nonasaccharide
(Bi9) and its a2–6(3)-sialylated
undecasac-charides (Bi1126, Bi1123).The bottom panel
illustrates the corresponding decasaccharides
and dodecasaccharides with bisecting
Glc-NAc.For expample, the abbreviation
BiB1226-BSA stands for biantennary bisecting
N-glycan 12-mer a2–6-sialylated BSA
conju-gate.The linker arm and the attachment point
to an e-amino group of lysine of the carrier
protein are also shown.
Trang 3and decreased migration activity was observed for human
U373 glioma cells bearing mutual overexpression of
GnT-III relative to GnT-V (shift from biantennary N-glycans
with bisecting GlcNAc to highly branched N-glycans), and
GnT-III-overexpressing human K562 erythroleukemic cells
rather effectively colonized the spleen in athymic mice with
acquisition of resistance to NK cell cytotoxicity [19–21]
Moreover, hemopoiesis supported by bone marrow stroma
requires, in part, integrity of N-glycans, and hemopoietic
dysfunction with lowered production of nonadherent cells in
transgenic mice with GnT-III overexpression demonstrates
that respective changes in the N-glycan profile account for
suppression of proliferation and differentiation of
hemopoi-etic cells [22,23].Altered glycosylation appears to translate
into cellular responses via biochemical pathways.Apart
from having a bearing on the protein part’s folding or access
to binding partners, the capacity of protein-bound glycan
chains to impart a discrete recognitional role to the protein
[24] deserves attention in this respect.Explicitly, the bisecting
GlcNAc has potential either to be directly engaged in
intermolecular interactions with receptors, e.g endogenous
lectins [4,25–30], or to modulate binding processes at other
sites in the chain through the shape alterations induced by its
presence.That bisecting GlcNAc constitutes a docking point
for protein–carbohydrate interactions is known from the
plant lectin erythroagglutinating phytohemagglutinin
(E-PHA), whereas the presence of a bisecting GlcNAc in a
core-fucosylated biantennary N-glycan did not affect
bind-ing to the L-fucose-specific lectin from Aleuria aurantia
[31–35].Annexin V, a cell surface marker of apoptotic cells,
has recently been reported to share this property with the
plant lectin E-PHA [36]
To determine if and to what extent ligand properties are
conveyed and/or affected by this natural substitution, and
then to devise routes for potential medical application, we
combined synthetic, biochemical, cell biological,
histopatho-logical and in vivo procedures.The question of whether
introduction of the bisecting GlcNAc changes the ligand
properties (binding affinities) of biantennary N-glycans for
branch-end-specific lectins as well as for cells and organs has
so far not been tackled.To this end, it is desirable to obtain
pure test substances, i.e N-glycans free of natural
micro-heterogeneity, by a convenient preparative route.After
developing a chemoenzymatic synthesis for biantennary
N-glycans with this distinct substitution, the preparation of
the corresponding glycan-bearing neoglycoproteins made
the required tools available.In a previous study, we prepared
neoglycoproteins carrying unsubstituted biantennary
N-glycans [37].These compounds were examined for their
properties in enzyme-linked lectin and cell binding assays,
histopathological monitoring, and organ biodistribution
[37].The utility of our combined approach and the
validity of the concept were then tested by assessing the
properties of N-glycans modified with a1–6 core fucose
Changes in cell biological parameters could be attributed
to the N-glycan modification [38].Pursuing this line of
research, we report results obtained with neoglycoproteins
carrying biantennary N-glycans with the bisecting
Glc-NAc motif.The chemoenzymatic synthesis of bisecting
N-glycans with terminal galactose or sialic acid residues is
presented followed by the generation of neoglycoproteins
To take advantage of the enormous strides made over
recent years in acquiring, storing and handling increasing quantities of data from molecular modeling calculations,
we devoted part of the study to scrutinizing the conformational properties of the substituted and unsub-stituted N-glycans.Their behavior patterns were compar-atively analyzed by refined computational protocols
in vacuo and, compared with previous calculations, in the presence of a defined solvent.The simulation periods were significantly extended.Experimentally, the ligand characteristics of the N-glycans as part of the neoglyco-proteins (Fig.1) were evaluated in biochemical, cell biological and histopathological assays including deter-mination of biodistribution in vivo relative to the control compounds (complex-type biantennary N-glycans lacking bisecting GlcNAc).It is shown that the bisecting substi-tution triggers alteration of ligand properties, implying functional significance of the bisecting GlcNAc as a modulator of N-glycan biorecognition
Materials and methods
Synthetic and analytical procedures NMR spectra were recorded with a Bruker AMX 500 spectrometer.HPLC separations were performed on a Pharmacia LKB gradient system 2249 equipped with a Pharmacia LKB Detector VWM 2141 (Freiburg, Germany) For size-exclusion chromatography, a Pharmacia Hi Load Superdex 30 column (600· 16 mm) was used.RP-HPLC was performed on a Macherey-Nagel Nucleogel RP 100-10 column (300· 25 mm).BSA, b1–4-galactosyltransferase, a2–6-sialyltransferase and nucleotide sugars were purchased from Sigma (Munich, Germany), and alkaline phosphatase (calf intestine, molecular biology grade; EC 3.1.3.1) from Roche Diagnostics (Heidelberg, Germany).We are grateful
to J.C.Paulson (Cytel Corp., San Diego, USA) for a sample
of recombinant a2–3-sialyltransferase.ESI mass spectra were recorded on a Finnigan TSQ 700 in methanol/water MALDI-TOF mass spectra were collected by D.Renauer at the Boehringer Mannheim research facility (Tutzing, Ger-many) on a Voyager Biospectrometry workstation (Vestec/ Perseptive) MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer, using 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid as a matrix.The structures of the synthetic N-glycans were invariably confirmed by the following 2D NMR experiments: TOCSY, NOESY, HMQC (heteronuclear multiple-quantum coherence), HMQC-COSY, HMQC-DEPT (distortionless enhance-ment by polarization transfer), HMQC-TOCSY.Signals of NMR spectra were assigned according to the following convention including the spacer
N1 -(6-Benzyloxycarbonyl-6-aminohexanoylamido)-2-ace-tamido-2-deoxy-b-D-glucopyranosyl)-(1fi 2)-a-D -mann-opyranosyl-(1fi 3)-[2-acetamido-2-deoxy-b-D -glucopy-ranosyl-(1fi 4)]-[2-acetamido-2-deoxy-b-
Trang 4-glucopyran-osyl-(1fi 2)-a-D-mannopyranosyl-(1fi 6)]-b-D
-mann-opyranosyl-(1fi
4)-2-acetamido-3,6-di-O-benzyl-2-de-oxy-b-D-glucopyranosyl-(1fi
4)-2-acetamido-3,6-di-O-benzyl-2-deoxy-b-D-glucopyranoside (3;
Bzl3-BiB8AH-Z).To a portion of 61.1 mg (32.1 lmol) glycosylazide (1)
dissolved in 2 mL methanol were added 65 lL
triethylam-ine.The flask was flushed with argon followed by addition
of 200 lL propane-1,3-dithiol [39].After completion of the
reaction (3.5 h; TLC: Rf amine¼ 0.22; propan-2-ol/1M
ammonium acetate, 4 : 1, v/v), the solution was evaporated
and dried in high vacuo for 15 min.The remainder was
allowed to react with a solution of activated
Z-aminohex-anoic acid (2) prepared as follows: 236 mg (0.89 mmol,
20 eq.) Z-aminohexanoic acid were dissolved in 3.5 mL
N-methylpyrrolidone Subsequently, 136.3 mg (0.89 mmol,
20 eq.) N-hydroxybenzotriazol (HOBT), 285.8 mg
(0.89 mmol, 20 eq.) TBTU
[(1H-benzotriazol-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium tetrafluoroborate] and 233 lL
(1.32 mmol) di-isopropylethylamine were added, following
a protocol for standard peptide chemistry activation [40]
The mixture was stirred until a clear solution was obtained
and adjusted to pH¼ 9 by adding 130 lL
di-isopropyl-ethylamine
The dried glycosylamine was dissolved in 2.5 mL of the
solution prepared as above, and the pH was adjusted to
9.0 with di-isopropylethylamine After 30 min at ambient
temperature (TLC: propan-2-ol/1M ammonium acetate,
4 : 1, v/v), 0.5 mL of the solution was added and stirring
was continued for 5 min.The reaction mixture was
evaporated and dried in high vacuo.Purification of the
remainder was performed by RP-HPLC [acetonitrile/water,
gradient of 35–45% acetonitrile run in 40 min; flow
rate¼ 8 mLÆmin)1, Macherey–Nagel Nucleogel RP
100-10 (300· 25 mm)] The yield was 36.8 mg (54.0%), and
analytical data were as follows: Rf(amine)¼ 0.22
(propan-2-ol/1M ammonium acetate, 2 : 1) and Rf (3)¼ 0.47
(propan-2-ol/1Mammonium acetate, 2 : 1);½a22D ¼) 2.3
(0.7, CH3CN/H2O, 1 : 1) and C100H139N7O43
(M¼ 2127.22) ESI-MS: Mcalcd¼ 2125.9, Mfound¼
1064.3 (M + 2 H)2+.(Complete set of1H/13C-NMR data
not shown.)
N1-(6-Aminohexanoylamido)-2-acetamido-2-deoxy-b-D
-glucopyranosyl)-(1fi 2)-a-D-mannopyranosyl-(1fi
3)-[2-acetamido-2-deoxy-b-D-glucopyranosyl-(1fi
4)]-[2-acetamido-2-deoxy-b-D-glucopyranosyl-(1fi 2)-a-D
-mannopyranosyl-(1fi 6)]-b-D-mannopyranosyl-(1fi
4)-2-acetamido-2-deoxy-b-D-glucopyranosyl-(1fi
4)-2-ace-tamido-2-deoxy-b-D-glucopyranoside (4; BiB8AH) A
35.8 mg (16.8 lmol) portion of the protected
octasaccha-ride (3) was dissolved in a mixture of 6.7 mL methanol and
330 lL acetic acid.After addition of 61 mg
palladium-(II)-oxide hydrate (84.6%; Pd), the suspension was stirred under
hydrogen at atmospheric pressure for 24 h (TLC:
propan-2-ol/1Mammonium acetate, 2 : 1, v/v).To drive the reaction
to completion, 50 mg palladium-(II)-oxide hydrate and
300 mL acetic acid were added, and hydrogenation was
continued for 6 h.The catalyst was removed by
centrifu-gation and washed three times with 10% (v/v) acetic acid in
methanol.The combined supernatants were concentrated,
and the remainder (36.0 mg) was purified by gel filtration
(column: Pharmacia Hi Load Superdex 30, 600· 16 mm;
mobile phase: 100 mMNH4HCO3; flow rate: 750 lLÆmin)1; detection: 220 and 260 nm) and lyophilized.The yield was 26.1 mg (95.0%) and analytical data were as follows:
Rf¼ 0.29 (propan-2-ol/1M ammonium acetate, 2 : 1, v/v), ½a22D ¼)1.0 (1.7, H2O) and C64H109N7O41 (M¼ 1632.59) ESI-MS: Mcalcd¼ 1631.68, Mfound¼ 816.9 (M + 2H)2+.(Complete set of 1H/13C-NMR data not shown.)
N1-(6-Aminohexanoylamido)-b-D-galactopyranosyl-(1fi 4)-2-acetamido-2-deoxy-b-D-glucopyranosyl-(1fi
2)-a-D-mannopyranosyl-(1fi 3)-[2-acetamido-2-deoxy-b-D -glucopyranosyl-(1fi 4)]-[b-D-galactopyranosyl-(1fi 4)-2-acetamido-2-deoxy-b-D-glucopyranosyl-(1fi 2)-a-D -mannopyranosyl-(1fi 6)]-b-D-mannopyranosyl-(1fi 4)-2-acetamido-2-deoxy-b-D-glucopyranosyl-(1fi 4)-2-ace-tamido-2-deoxy-b-D-glucopyranoside (5; BiB10AH) A 6.8 mg portion (4.17 lmol) octasaccharide (4) was dissolved
in 2.4 mL 20 mM sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 1.7 mg BSA, 4.34 lmol NaN3, 2 43 lmol MnCl2, 8 3 mg (12 5 lmol) UDP-galactose, 10.3 U alkaline phosphatase and 206 mU GlcNAc-b1–4-galactosyltrans-ferase (EC 2.4.1.22) The reaction mixture was incubated for
48 h at 37C.After complete reaction (TLC: propan-2-ol/
1M ammonium acetate, 2 : 1, v/v), the precipitate was removed by centrifugation.The supernatant was concen-trated to a volume of 450 lL, purified by gel filtration (column: Pharmacia Hi Load Superdex 30, 600· 16 mm; mobile phase: 100 mMNH4HCO3; flow rate: 750 lLÆmin)1; detection: 220 and 260 nm) and lyophilized.The yield was 7.3 mg (89.4%) and analytical data were as follows:
Rf¼ 0.15 (propan-2-ol/1Mammonium acetate, 2 : 1, v/v),
½a22D ¼ + 2 6 (0.46; H2O) and C76H129N7O51 (M¼ 1956.87) ESI-MS: Mcalcd¼ 1955.79, Mfound¼ 978.9 (M + 2H)2+.(Complete set of 1H/13C-NMR data not shown.)
N1 -(6-Aminohexanoylamido)-(5-acetamido-3,5-dideoxy-a-D-glycero-D-galacto-2-nonulopyranulosonic acid)-(2 fi 6)-b-D-galactopyranosyl-(1fi 4)-2-acetamido-2-deoxy-b-D-glucopyranosyl-(1fi 2)-a-D -mannopyranosyl-(1fi 3)-[2-acetamido-2-deoxy-b-D -glucopyranosyl-(1fi 4)]-[(5-acetamido-3,5-dideoxy-a-D-glycero-D -gal-acto-2-nonulopyranulosonic acid)-(2fi 6)b-D -galactopy-ranosyl-(1fi 4)-2-acetamido-2-deoxy-b-D -glucopyrano-syl-(1 fi 2)-a-D-mannopyranosyl-(1fi 6)]-b-D -man-nopyranosyl-(1fi 4)-2-acetamido-2-deoxy-b-D -glucopy-ranosyl-(1fi 4)-2-acetamido-2-deoxy-b-D -glucopyrano-side (6; BiB1226AH) A 6.8 mg portion (4.17 lmol) of octasaccharide (4) was dissolved in 2.4 mL 20 mMsodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 1.7 mg BSA, 4.34 lmol NaN3, 2 43 lmol MnCl2, 8.3 mg (12.5 lmol) UDP-galactose, 10.3 U alkaline phosphatase and 206 mU GlcNAc-b1–4-galactosyltransferase.The reaction mixture was incubated for 48 h at 37C.After complete reaction (TLC: propan-2-ol/1M ammonium acetate, 2 : 1, v/v), 7.0 mg (9.1 lmol) CMP-N-acetylneuraminic acid and
75 mU b-galactoside-a2–6-sialyltransferase (EC 2.4.99.1) were added.After the pH had been adjusted to 6.0, incubation at 37C was continued for 24 h.A second portion of 7.0 mg (9.1 lmol) CMP-N-acetylneuraminic acid and 75 mU b-galactoside-a2–6-sialyltransferase was
Trang 5added (pH 6.0) Incubation at 37C for 24 h was followed
by removal of the precipitate by centrifugation.The
supernatant was concentrated to a volume of 450 lL,
purified by gel filtration (column: Pharmacia Hi Load
Superdex 30, 600· 16 mm; mobile phase: 100 mM
NH4HCO3; flow rate: 750 lLÆmin)1; detection: 220 and
260 nm) and lyophilized The yield was 8.4 mg (79.5%),
and analytical data were as follows: Rf¼ 0.11 (propan-2-ol/
1Mammonium acetate, 2 : 1, v/v),½a22D ¼ + 8 1 (0.28;
H2O) and C98H163N9O67 (M¼ 2539.39) ESI-MS:
Mcalcd¼ 2537.96, Mfound¼ 1270.3 (M + 2H)2+
.(Com-plete set of1H/13C-NMR data not shown.)
N1
-(6-Aminohexanoylamido)-(5-acetamido-3,5-dideoxy-a-D-glycero-D-galacto-2-nonulopyranulosonic
acid)-(2fi 3)-b-D-galactopyranosyl-(1fi
4)-2-acetamido-2-deoxy-b-D-glucopyranosyl-(1fi 2)-a-D
-mannopyranosyl-(1fi 3)-[2-acetamido-2-deoxy-b-D
-glucopyranosyl-(1fi 4)]-[(5-acetamido-3,5-dideoxy-a-D-glycero-D
-gal-acto-2-nonulopyranulosonic acid)-(2fi 3)-b-D
-galacto-pyranosyl-(1fi 4)-2-acetamido-2-deoxy-b-D
-glucopyra-nosyl-(1fi 2)-a-D-mannopyranosyl-(1fi ]-b-D
-manno-pyranosyl-(1fi 4)-2-acetamido-2-deoxy-b-D
-glucopyran-osyl-(1fi 4)-2-acetamido-2-deoxy-b-D-glucopyranoside
(7; BiB1223AH) A 6.8 mg portion (4.17 lmol) of
octasaccharide (4) was dissolved in 2.4 mL 20 mMsodium
cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 1.7 mg BSA,
4.34 lmol NaN3, 2 43 lmol MnCl2, 8.3 mg (12.5 lmol)
UDP-galactose, 10.3 U alkaline phosphatase and 206 mU
GlcNAc-b1–4-galactosyltransferase.The reaction mixture
was incubated for 48 h at 37C.After complete reaction
(TLC: propan-2-ol/1M ammonium acetate, 2 : 1, v/v),
7.0 mg (9.1 lmol) CMP-N-acetylneuraminic acid and
103 mU b-galactoside-a2–3-sialyltransferase (EC 2.4.99.6)
were added.After the pH had been adjusted to 6.0,
incubation at 37C was continued for 24 h.A second
portion of 7.0 mg (9.1 lmol) CMP-N-acetylneuraminic
acid and 103 mU b-galactoside-a2–3-sialyltransferase were
added (pH 6.0) Incubation at 37C for 24 h was followed
by removal of the precipitate by centrifugation.The
supernatant was concentrated to a volume of 450 lL,
purified by gel filtration (column: Pharmacia Hi Load
Superdex 30, 600· 16 mm; mobile phase: 100 mM
NH4HCO3; flow rate: 750 lLÆmin)1; detection: 220 and
260 nm) and lyophilized The yield was 6.5 mg (61.4%) and
analytical data were as follows: Rf¼ 0.14 (propan-2-ol/1M
ammonium acetate, 2 : 1, v/v), ½a22D ¼ + 11 2 (0.1;
H2O) and C98H163N9O67 (M¼ 2539.39) ESI-MS:
Mcalcd¼ 2537.96, Mfound¼ 1270.3 (M + 2H)2+
.(Com-plete set of1H/13C-NMR data not shown.)
To obtain the neoglycoproteins from the spacered
N-gly-cans, the terminal amino group was converted into a reactive
isothiocyanate [41,42].In detail, a 0.34 lmol portion of each
6-aminohexanoyl-N-glycan (5–7) was dissolved in 200 lL
dilute NaHCO3(100 mg Na2CO3/10 mL H2O) in a 1.5 mL
plastic vessel.A solution of 1 lL (13 1 lmol) thiophosgene in
200 lL dichloromethane was added, and the biphasic
mixture was vigorously stirred.After the amine had been
consumed (1.5 h; TLC: 2-propanol/1Mammonium acetate
2 : 1, v/v; Rfof the decasaccharide derivative¼ 0.45; Rfof
the a2–3-disialylated derivative¼ 0.35; Rf of the
a2–6-disialylated derivative¼ 0.28), the phases were separated by
centrifugation, and the aqueous phase was collected.The organic phase was extracted twice with 100 mL dilute NaHCO3.To remove traces of thiophosgene, the combined aqueous phases were extracted twice with dichloromethane
A 2 mg portion of carbohydrate-free BSA was dissolved in the aqueous solution containing the isothiocyanate deriv-ative.The pH was adjusted to 9.0 by addition of 1MNaOH After 6 days at ambient temperature, the neoglycoprotein was purified by gel filtration (column: Pharmacia Hi Load Superdex 30, 600· 16 mm; mobile phase: 100 mM
NH4HCO3; flow rate: 750 lLÆmin)1; detection: 220 and
260 nm).The product-containing solution was lyophilized
To calculate the extent of oligosaccharide incorporation into the protein carrier, a colorimetric assay was employed [43] Gel electrophoretic analysis under denaturing conditions combined with silver staining of the neoglycoproteins was performed as described [37,38].In addition to these three neoglycoproteins, lactosylated albumin was produced as control by the diazonium and phenylisothiocyanate reac-tions with p-aminophenyl b-lactoside [41,42]
Molecular modeling The simulations were performed on an IBM-SP2 parallel machine using the program DISCOVER on four or eight processors in parallel.Typically, they took several days of CPU time until completed and produced history files with a size ranging from several hundred megabytes to about 2 GB
In detail, molecular dynamics calculations of the N-glycans using parametrization by the CFF91 force field and automatic procedures ofINSIGHT II(Molecular Simulations, San Diego, CA, USA) were run at 1000 K in vacuum using a dielectric constant of four and at 300 K, 400 K and 450 K in
a solvent box with explicit water molecules in the program frame DISCOVER version 2.98 (Accelrys Inc., San Diego, USA).An additional force was applied to the pyranose rings
at 1000 K to avoid ring inversions.After an equilibration period of 100 ps, simulations proceeded for 50–100 ns in the gas phase and for 1–25 ns in the solvent box.To be able to describe the conformational space, which is occupied during the simulation, several characteristic distances between pseudo atoms were evaluated.The pseudo atom co-ordinates
of each sugar moiety are defined by the arithmetic mean value of the co-ordinates of its heavy atoms.Conformational analysis of the data obtained used suitable software tools,
as described previously [44,45]
Lectin-binding assay Purification of galactoside-specific lectins from dried leaves
of mistletoe (Viscum album L) and bovine heart and of the b-galactoside-binding IgG fraction from human serum, the purity controls, biotinylation of the sugar receptors under activity-preserving conditions, and quantitation of carbo-hydrate-specific binding to surface-immobilized neoglyco-proteins have been described in detail previously [37,38,46] The experimental series with increasing concentrations of labeled markers and duplicates at each concentration step were performed at least four times up to saturation of binding, and each data set was algebraically transformed to obtain the Kd value and the number of bound sugar receptor molecules at saturation
Trang 6Flow cytofluorimetry
Automated flow cytofluorimetric analysis of
carbohydrate-dependent binding of biotinylated marker to the surface of
a panel of human tumor cells of different histogenetic
origin [BLIN-1, pre-B cell line; Croco II, B-lymphoblastoid
cell line; CCRF-CEM, T-lymphoblastoid cell line; K-562,
erythroleukemia cell line; KG-1, acute myelogenous
leukemia cell line; HL-60, promyelocytic cell line;
DU4475, mammary carcinoma cell line; NIH:OVCAR-3,
ovarian carcinoma cell line; C205, SW480, and SW620,
colon adenocarcinoma cell lines; Hs-294T, melanoma cell
line; HS-24, nonsmall cell (epidermoid) lung carcinoma cell
line] using the streptavidin–R-phycoerythrin conjugate as
fluorescent indicator (1 : 40 dilution; Sigma, Munich,
Germany) was performed on a FACScan instrument
(Becton-Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) equipped with
the softwareCONSORT30, as described previously [37,38]
To reduce nonspecific binding by protein–protein
interac-tions, cells were incubated with 100 lg ligand-free carrier
protein (BSA) per mL for 30 min at 4C before incubation
with the biotinylated neoglycoprotein in Dulbecco’s
phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% (w/v)
ligand-free BSA.The extent of noncarbohydrate-dependent
fluorescence intensity was subtracted in each case from
the total binding
Glycohistochemical processing
Following an optimized procedure for visualizing
carbohy-drate-ligand-dependent binding of the neoglycoproteins to
sections of bronchial tumour [small cell (18 cases) and the
three types of nonsmall cell lung cancer (total number of
cases 60; 20 for each type), mesothelioma (20 cases) and
carcinoid (20 cases)], the specimens were processed under
identical conditions with ABC kit reagents and the
substrates diaminobenzidine/H2O2for development of the
colored, water-insoluble product [42,47,48].A case was
considered to be positive when at least clusters of tumor cells
were specifically stained and the controls excluded binding
of the labeled neoglycoprotein via the protein, the spacer or
the biotin moieties [42,47,48].Also, control experiments
without the incubation step with the marker ruled out
staining by binding of kit reagents, i.e the glycoprotein
avidin or horseradish peroxidase [49]
Biodistribution of radioiodinated neoglycoproteins
Incorporation of125I into the neoglycoproteins to a specific
activity of 11.5 MBqÆ(mg protein))1 was achieved by the
chloramine-T method using limiting amounts of reagents
[50].The retention of radioactivity in organs of
Ehrlich-solid-tumor-bearing ddY mice (7 weeks old; Nihon Clea
Co., Tokyo, Japan) after injection of 28.75 kBq per animal
into the tail vein was determined by a c-counter (Aloka
ARC 300, Tokyo, Japan) and expressed as percentage of the
injected dose per gram of wet tissue or per milliliter of blood
for a group of four mice for each type of neoglycoprotein
and for each time point, as described [37,51,52].The mice
were treated and/or handled according to the Guide
Principles for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of
the Japanese Pharmacological Society and with the
approval of Tokyo University of Science’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
Results
Synthetic chemistry
A synthetic biantennary heptasaccharide N-glycan with a single unprotected hydroxy group at the 4¢ position of the b-linked mannose moiety was used to introduce the bisecting GlcNAc residue in a yield of 56%.This reaction pathway was planned as an extension of the basic chemo-enzymatic strategy of N-glycan synthesis and required no change in protecting group manipulations [53,54].After completion of the synthesis of the bisecting octasaccharide, the removal of the base-labile protective groups was straightforward and led to compound 1 (Fig.2).Selective reduction of the azido function at the anomeric center was achieved by the propanedithiol method.After removal of the volatile compounds in high vacuo, the intermediate glycosylamine was coupled to the 6-aminohexanoic acid derivative 2 using standard peptide chemistry activation with TBTU/HOBt which generates the intermediate active ester of 2 (Fig.2).An excess of the activated spacer 2 was required in the coupling step, suggesting that the remaining traces of propane-1,3-dithiol were scavenging the active ester.The purified octasaccharide spacer conjugate 3 was obtained in 54% yield after preparative HPLC.In the final deprotection step, catalytic hydrogenation was used to simultaneously remove the four permanent benzyl groups from the chitobiosyl core and liberate the primary amino function in the spacer part.Compound 4 was easily purified
by gel filtration and processed further to the final carbo-hydrate derivatives 5–7 by enzymatic elongation of the carbohydrate chain using glycosyltransferases.The presence
of alkaline phosphatase ensured removal of inhibitors [55]
In the first enzymatic step, bovine milk b1–4-galactosyl-transferase attached galactosyl moieties to each of the terminal GlcNAc residues of the a1–3 and a1–6 arms.As expected, the bisecting GlcNAc residue was not a substrate, presumably because of sterically blocked access for the enzyme exerted by the two antennae [56].The resulting digalactosylated dodecasaccharide 5 (Fig.2) was purified (89% yield after gel filtration), and portions were subse-quently incubated in a one-pot reaction with CMP-sialic acid and either a2–6 or a2–3-sialyltransferase.After puri-fication, the desired sialylated dodecasaccharides 6 and 7 were obtained in a yield of 80% and 61%, respectively.To ensure the structural identity of all reaction products shown
in Fig.2, compounds 1–7 were routinely analyzed by electrospray ionization MS (detailed in Materials and methods) and by complete assignment of the ring carbons and hydrogens by state-of-the-art 2D NMR techniques (not shown).TOCSY, NOESY, HMQC, HMQC-COSY, HMQC-DEPT and HMQC-TOCSY experiments were employed.Conjugation of the three N-glycans 5–7 to BSA as cytochemically and histochemically inert carrier was acomplished by selective activation of the terminal amino group, as illustrated in Fig.3 The free amines were converted into isothiocyanates by thiophosgene in a bipha-sic reaction, which was followed conveniently by TLC.The isothiocyanates [10 eq.Æ(mol BSA))1] were added directly to
Trang 7carbohydrate-free BSA and allowed to react for 6 days at
pH 9.0 After purification of the neoglycoproteins,
success-ful conjugation was first visualized by the shift in
electro-phoretic mobility in standard SDS/PAGE (Fig.4) The
mean N-glycan incorporation into the carriers (measured by
a colorimetric assay) for decasaccharide (5) was 3.6
N-glycan molecules per BSA molecule.The reactions with
the sialylated dodecasaccharides 6 and 7 resulted in 4.9 and
3.1 carrier-conjugated glycan chains, respectively Two main
effects of the bisecting GlcNAc unit on the conformation of
the biantennary glycan were pinpointed graphically by
molecular modeling.In comparison with previous work
[6–11], we (a) extended the simulation periods considerably,
(b) added calculations in a solvent box, and (c) assessed
probabilities of population density in the conformational
space with improved statistical reliability and without the
strict dependence on time-averaged distance constraints
Computational chemistry
Computational methods were used to analyze the dynamic
behavior of the a1–3/a1–6 branches in the absence and
presence of the bisecting GlcNAc residue.The calculated
xyz population densities of all monosaccharide building blocks were translated into a strict free-energy grading using the Boltzmann equation.Isocontour plots at a constant free energy level of 1.5 kcalÆmol)1were drawn to visualize the inherent flexibility at each point of the branches and the relation of individual flexibility to structural changes (Fig.5).Interestingly, the molecular dynamics (MD) calcu-lations set to vacuum or a solvent box with water mole-cules gave very similar results.A prevailing influence of van der Waals dispersive and repulsive forces on the conformational properties of this system is consistent with this outcome.Relative to the absence of solvent, the simulated presence of water molecules had a dampening effect on the extent of conformational fluctuations and dynamics of intramolecular mobility.The way in which the bisecting substituent shapes the population density of the biantennary nonasaccharide and decasaccharide is shown in Fig.5B,C.As part of the sugar chain, the bisecting GlcNAc induced separation of the accessed space of the a1–6 arm into two sections (Fig.5C) In comparison with the behavior of the unsubstituted N-glycan, the vicinity of the core trisaccharide becomes fairly accessible for terminal residues of the a1–6 arm, a process referred to as
backfold-Fig 2 Chemical and enzymatic steps to pro-duce galactosylated and sialylated N-glycans substituted with bisecting GlcNAc (a) 1, pro-panedithiol, Et 3 N, MeOH; 2, N-benzyloxy-carbonyl-6-aminohexanoic acid, TBTU, 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBT) (1–2: 54%) (b) Pd-H 2 , AcOH, MeOH (95%).(c) b1–4-galactosyltransferase, UDP-Gal, alkaline phosphatase (89%).(d) a2–6-sialyltransferase, CMP-NeuNAc, alkaline phosphatase (c + d: 80%).(e) a2–3-sialyltransferase, CMP-Neu-NAc, alkaline phosphatase (c + e: 61%).
Trang 8ing.The wedge-like central GlcNAc moiety accounts for
other changes presented in Fig.5.The inherent flexibility of
the a1–3 arm is clearly restricted in the bisecting compound
(Fig.5B,C).Backfolding and restrained fluctuations have
been confirmed by experimental NMR analysis with model
oligosaccharides [6–11].The contribution of carbohydrate
stacking to chain flexibility becomes apparent when two
energetically favored conformations are scrutinized (Fig.6)
Regions I and II in Fig.6A,B comprise conformations from
the MD trajectories, with distances between pseudo atoms
characteristic of stacking.Examples of the topological
arrangements of the chain constituents from these regions
are illustrated in Fig.6C,D.To compare major aspects of the conformational ensembles of the N-glycans, including the sialylated compounds without/with bisecting GlcNAc, representative snapshots from the MD trajectories are presented in Fig.7 A topological constellation showing how the pronounced flexibility of the a1–6 branch can lead
to a dramatic reduction in intramolecular contact with the bisecting GlcNAc, a situation especially encountered in region III, is depicted in Fig.7C,D
At this point, the frequent occurrence of N-glycosylation should be recalled.It is still difficult to gauge the influence of the protein backbone on glycan flexibility in individual instances.In this context, it is reassuring to note that oligosaccharides from N-glycoproteins, for example the Man5)8 N-glycans from RNase B [57,58], can exhibit conformational behavior similar to that when attached to the protein.Therefore, it can be assumed that constant dynamics or only slightly changed level of mobility will also
be encountered in other cases, especially for neoglycopro-teins with spacer-bound glycans, where spatial constraints exerted by the protein are reduced by adding a linker However, emerging evidence for the varying influence of a bisecting GlcNAc on the processing of branch ends for several glycoproteins precludes general a priori deductions being drawn [59].Nonetheless, Figs 5–7, combined with the experimental evidence reviewed in the Introduction, show how the addition of the bisecting GlcNAc modifies the conformational behavior of the N-glycan.To determine whether binding of sugar receptors to the branches is affected by the bisecting modification, we performed solid-phase assays with the same set of lectins and antibodies, as described previously [37].With galectin-1 as a test substance,
we selected an endogenous lectin that mediates tumor cell adhesion to extracellular matrix glycoproteins, a key step in the metastatic process, invasion of the parenchyma, and growth regulation after ligand cross-linking [27,28,60–67] Solid-phase assay
The incorporation of 3.1–4.9 N-glycan chains per albumin molecule was comparable to the yields in our previous studies [37,38].The neoglycoproteins obtained were thus
Fig 3 Activation of the amino group of the
spacer at the reducing end of the synthetic
N-glycans represented by dodecasaccharide (6)
and the coupling to BSA (a) Thiophosgene,
CH 2 Cl 2 /H 2 O, NaHCO 3 , pH 8.5 (quant.); (b)
BSA, H 2 O, NaHCO 3 , pH 9 0.
Fig 4 Visualization of the gel electrophoretic mobility under denaturing
conditions of carbohydrate-free BSA (A) and the neoglycoproteins
car-rying the decasaccharide with bisecting GlcNAc (5) (B) and the
a2–3-sialylated (C) and a2–6-sialylated (D) derivatives (substances 6 and 7 in
Fig 2) Positions of marker proteins for molecular mass designation
are indicated by arrowheads.
Trang 9expected to have sufficient ligand density for interaction.In
contrast with natural glycoproteins, the problem of
micro-heterogeneity of the N-glycans is not encountered with these
synthetic products.To monitor the ligand properties
comparatively, we maintained the test profile with a dimeric
plant lectin, mammalian homodimeric galectin-1 and
b-galactoside-specific IgG fraction from human serum
Similar to the interaction of a lectin with a cell surface and
following the protocol of our two previous studies, the
neoglycoproteins were first bound to the surface and the glycan-binding proteins assayed in solution.Thereby, any distortion of the lectin/antibody structures by adsorption to plastic was avoided.In the solid-phase assay, saturable and carbohydrate-dependent binding was measured, and the resulting Scatchard plots gave straight lines indicating the presence of a single class of binding sites in each case (not shown).To allow convenient comparisons, we summarize our data together with previous results on unsubstituted
Fig 5 Illustration of the nomenclature system for the N-glycan constituents (A) and of their inherent flexibility by isocontour plots (derived from analysis of xyz population densities of each monosaccharide unit) at a constant energy level of 1.5 kcalÆmol-1for the biantennary nonasaccharide (B; first structure in Fig 1) and the decasaccharide containing the bisecting GlcNAc (C; structure 4in Fig 1 and substance 5 in Fig 2) For convenient comparison, the conformations were positioned in space in the same way by superimposing the ring atoms of mannose units of the pentasaccharide core.Access to the conformational space in the vicinity of the linear part of the core for the terminal galactose moiety of the a1–6 arm is emphasized
by introducing the term backfolded into the figure (C; also Fig.7C,D).
Fig 6 Analysis of the involvement of the bisecting GlcNAc unit in stacking interactions by measuring pseudo atom distances between this residue (Fig 5A, 9) and spatially neighbouring residues 4, 5 and 4¢, 5¢ of the two branches, respectively, in MD simulations The pseudo atom co-ordinates of each sugar moiety are defined by the arithmetic mean of the co-ordinates of its heavy atoms.Two energetically favored conformational families with glycosidic torsion angle sets of the GlcNAcb1–4Man linkage of F ¼ 50 /Y ¼ 20 (A; global minimum) or F ¼ )30 /Y ¼ )30 (B; side minimum) were separately analyzed.The two illustrated conformations representing examples from regions I and II were taken from the MD trajectories in explicit solvent (for clarity, water molecules are not shown).Distance values between residues 9 and 5 (5¢) located in region I (A) are characteristic of occurrence of stacking indicated by arrows (C).Spatial proximity to the 4 (4¢) residues can still be maintained for the bisecting GlcNAc in region II (A, B, D).In region III, populated by the flexible a1–6 branch, the intramolecular contact with the bisecting GlcNAc is clearly diminished.
Trang 10N-glycans [37] in Table 1.The general conclusion is that the
presence of a bisecting GlcNAc affects lectin affinity
In the case of mistletoe lectin, the introduction of a
bisecting GlcNAc into the glycan was unfavorable for
binding.The affinity of the galactose-dependent interaction
was about sixfold lower (Bi9-BSA vs.BiB10-BSA, Table 1)
A similar result was obtained for the a2–6-sialylated
derivative, which is a ligand with even greater binding affinity than the sialic-acid-free N-glycan (Bi1126-BSA vs BiB1226-BSA, Table 1) a2–3-Sialylation produced an un-favorable docking site.The introduction of the glycan substituent at a distance from the actual contact site for the lectin can thus indeed modulate ligand properties, without being directly involved in binding.Remarkably, the plant
Fig 7 Illustration of major aspects of the conformational ensembles of sialylated derivatives of the biantennary nonasaccharide Bi9 (A) and of the decasaccharide BiB10 (for nomenclature, see Fig 1) with the bisecting GlcNAc (B–D) The conformations presented were taken from the MD trajectories in explicit solvent (for clarity, water molecules are not shown).The terminal sialic acid moieties of the branches are designated as N and N¢ to allow easy visualization in the extended (A, B) and backfolded structures (C, D).A description of the populated conformational space has been given in Fig.5B,C and that the conformations shown in Fig.6C,D complement the illustration of the extended structure of the biantennary N-glycan with bisecting GlcNAc.Stacking interactions with this moiety (indicated by an arrow between residue 4 in the a1–3 branch as the main contact point and the bisecting GlcNAc) are also possible in backfolded structures (D).
Table 1 Apparent dissociation constants (K d ) for the interaction of (neo)glycoproteins with sugar receptors and the number of bound probe molecules at saturation for Viscum album agglutinin (VAA), bovine galectin-1 and the human b-galactoside-binding IgG subfraction from human serum in a solid-phase assay K d is given in n M ; B max is expressed as bound probe molecules per well.The assays with VAA and the neoglycoprotein BiB1226-BSA were performed with 0.25 lg as matrix.For Lac-BSA (diazo) and Lac-BSA (thio) BSA was glycosylated by covalent attachment of either the diazophenyl derivative (diazo) or the p-isothiocyanatophenyl derivative (thio) of p-aminophenyl b- D -lactoside.Each value is the mean ± SD from
at least four independent experimental series, the quantity of (neo)glycoprotein for coating in lg/well being given for each type of substance.
Matrix
BiB10-BSA (0.5 lg) 163.3 ± 79.4 1.9 ± 0.4 · 10 10
518.6 ± 118 2.1 ± 0.6 · 10 10
73.9 ± 31.6 2.3 ± 1.9 · 10 10 BiB1223-BSA (0.5 lg) 1063 ± 347 1.4 ± 0.6 · 10 10
817.9 ± 493 1.6 ± 0.6 · 10 10
36.1 ± 26.5 2.9 ± 1.1 · 10 10 BiB1226-BSA (0.5 lg) 49.8 ± 19.9 4.2 ± 2.3 · 10 10 829.6 ± 50.6 2.2 ± 0.6 · 10 10 71.8 ± 48.9 2.5 ± 1.1 · 10 10 Bi9-BSA (0.5 lg)a 26.7 ± 11.6 4.6 ± 1.9 · 10 10
900.1 ± 176 42.8 ± 12.5 · 10 10
32.9 ± 19.6 0.35 ± 0.1 · 10 10 Bi1123-BSA (0.5 lg)a 938.4 ± 661 8.2 ± 4.4 · 10 10
829.5 ± 501 42.0 ± 16.5 · 10 10
87.3 ± 62.7 0.38 ± 0.1 · 10 10 Bi1126-BSA (0.5 lg) a 8.7 ± 4.5 6.1 ± 1.4 · 10 10 1025.5 ± 619 48.7 ± 18.4 · 10 10 33.9 ± 4.6 0.46 ± 0.1 · 10 10 Lac-BSA (diazo) (3 lg) 312.4 ± 190 4.7 ± 2.3 · 10 10 1127.2 ± 53.3 34.6 ± 17.6 · 10 10 139.0 ± 87.6 0.70 ± 0.1 · 10 10 Lac-BSA (thio) (0.5 lg) 13.4 ± 7.3 5.1 ± 0.2 · 10 10
516.0 ± 20.3 83.3 ± 6.5 · 10 10
7.6 ± 5.2 0.65 ± 0.1 · 10 10 Asialofetuin (1 lg) 7.4 ± 2.6 4.9 ± 0.5 · 10 10 819.0 ± 268 37.5 ± 10.7 · 10 10 69.2 ± 40.2 0.43 ± 0.1 · 10 10 a
From [37].