1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Báo cáo khoa học: Atg8L/Apg8L is the fourth mammalian modifier of mammalian Atg8 conjugation mediated by human Atg4B, Atg7 and Atg3 docx

10 304 0
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 10
Dung lượng 417,54 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Results The C-terminus of Atg8L is cleaved in HEK293 cells, and the Gly116 of Atg8L is essential for cleavage The C-termini of yeast Atg8, mammalian LC3, GABA-RAP and GATE-16 are post-tr

Trang 1

mammalian Atg8 conjugation mediated by human Atg4B, Atg7 and Atg3

Isei Tanida, Yu-shin Sou, Naoko Minematsu-Ikeguchi, Takashi Ueno and Eiki Kominami

Molecular Cell Biology, Department of Biochemistry, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Ubiquitylation and ubiquitylation-like reactions are

post-translational modifications that play indispensable

roles in many cellular events Atg8⁄ Apg8 ⁄ Aut7 is a

ubiquitin-like (Ubl) protein essential for autophagy in

the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae [1] Genetic analyses

of yeast ATG gene mutants have suggested that the

C-terminus of Atg8 is cleaved by Atg4 or a protease

activated by Atg4⁄ Apg4 to expose the C-terminal Gly

of Atg8 [2–4] Subsequently, Atg8 is activated by

Atg7⁄ Apg7 ⁄ Gsa7 ⁄ Cvt2, an E1-like enzyme [5–8],

transferred to Atg3⁄ Apg3 ⁄ Aut1, an E2-like enzyme [3],

and finally conjugated to phosphatidylethanolamine

[3] This conjugation reaction is essential for

auto-phagy under conditions of starvation and in the

cyto-plasm for the vacuole-targeting (Cvt) pathway under

nutrient-rich conditions

To date, three Atg8 homologs have been

character-ized in mammals: LC3 (microtubule-associated protein 1

light chain 3, MAP1-LC3) [9,10], 4-aminobutyrateA -receptor associated protein (GABARAP) [11–13], and Golgi-associated ATPase enhancer of 16 kDa (GATE-16) [12–14] Following cleavage by human Atg4B⁄ autophagin 1, the C-terminal Gly of each of these Atg8 homologs is exposed, as is also observed for yeast Atg8 [13,15] Human Atg4A⁄ autophagin 2 also cleaves the C-terminus of GATE-16 [16] Following C-terminal cleavage, each Atg8 homolog is activated by human Atg7, an E1-like enzyme, to form a transient E1-sub-strate intermediate [12,17,18] Each Atg8 homolog is subsequently transferred to human Atg3, an E2-like enzyme, to form a transient E2-substrate intermediate, and modified to the membrane-bound forms, LC3-II, GABARAP-PL (GABARAP-II), and GATE-16-II [12,19] Recently, it has been shown that LC3-II and GABARAP-PL are protein–phospholipid conjugates [15], with phosphatidylethanolamine thought to be the

Keywords

autophagy; GABARAP; GATE-16; LC3;

ubiquitylation-like modification

Correspondence

E Kominami, Department of Biochemistry,

Juntendo University School of Medicine,

2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421,

Japan

Fax: +81 3 5802 5889

Tel: +81 3 5802 1031

E-mail: kominami@med.juntendo.ac.jp

(Received 23 December 2005, revised

4 April 2006, accepted 5 April 2006)

doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05260.x

Murine Atg8L⁄ Apg8L has significant homology with the other known mammalian Atg8 homologs, LC3, GABARAP and GATE-16 However, it

is unclear whether murine Atg8L modification is mediated by human Atg4B, Atg7 and Atg3 Expression of Atg8L in HEK293 cells led to clea-vage of its C-terminus In vitro, the C-terminus of Atg8L was cleaved by human Atg4B, but not human Atg4A or Atg4C Atg8L-I formed an E1-substrate intermediate with Atg7C572S, and an E2-substrate intermediate with Atg3C264S A modified form of Atg8L was detected in the pelletable fraction in the presence of lysosomal protease inhibitors under nutrient-rich conditions Cyan fluorescent protein (CFP)–Atg8L colocalized with yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)–LC3 in HeLa cells in the presence of the inhibi-tors However, little accumulation of the modified form of Atg8L was observed under conditions of starvation These results indicate that Atg8L

is the fourth modifier of mammalian Atg8 conjugation

Abbreviations

CFP, cyan fluorescent protein; GABARAP, 4-aminobutyrate A receptor-associated protein; GABARAP-PL, GABARAP–phospholipid conjugate; GFP, green fluorescent protein; LC3, human microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3; LC3-I, soluble unmodified form of LC3; LC3-II, LC3–phospholipid conjugate; PL, phospholipid; PVDF, poly(vinylidene difluoride); TRX, thioredoxin; YFP, yellow fluorescent protein.

Trang 2

phospholipid bound to LC3 [13,20] LC3-II and

GABARAP-PL are both deconjugated by human

Atg4B [15] It is unclear whether the target of

GATE-16 is a phospholipid

Recently, a fourth mammalian Atg8 homolog has

been reported, mouse Atg8L⁄ Apg8L [21] The amino

acid sequence of mouse Atg8L⁄ Apg8L shows 100%

and 54% identity to those of human Atg8L and yeast

Atg8, respectively, and 33%, 60% and 86% identity to

the amino acid sequences of LC3, GATE-16 and

GABARAP, respectively In addition, Atg8L shares a

conserved Gly at its C-terminus Following chemical

modification of Atg8L with a C-terminal vinyl sulfone,

mouse Atg8L–vinyl sulfone was shown to react with

Atg4B, suggesting that mouse Atg8L is a substrate of

Atg4B [21] However, no direct evidence that mouse

Atg8L is cleaved by Atg4B has yet been reported

Fur-thermore, both the homology between Atg8L and the

three other mammalian Atg8 homologs and the

con-served C-terminal Gly in all four proteins suggest that

Atg8L may also be a substrate of mammalian Atg7

and Atg3 Therefore, we examined whether Atg8L is a

substrate of these three enzymes involved in

mamma-lian Atg8 conjugation

Results

The C-terminus of Atg8L is cleaved in HEK293

cells, and the Gly116 of Atg8L is essential for

cleavage

The C-termini of yeast Atg8, mammalian LC3,

GABA-RAP and GATE-16 are post-translationally cleaved to

expose a Gly residue, which is essential for ubiquitin-like

modification [3,10,12] This consensus Gly116 is

con-served in Atg8 and its mammalian homologs [21], and is

present in Atg8L To determine whether the C-terminus

of Atg8L is post-translationally cleaved, we constructed

an Atg8L expression vector tagged with a Myc epitope

at its N-terminus and a 3xFLAG epitope at its

C-termi-nus (Fig 1A, Myc–Atg8Lwt)3xFLAG) Following

transfection of HEK293 cells with this construct, the

lysates were analyzed by SDS⁄ PAGE A protein of

18 kDa corresponding to Myc–Atg8L, a C-terminal

cleaved form of Myc–Atg8Lwt)3xFLAG, was

recog-nized by immunoblotting with anti-Myc, but not with

anti-FLAG (Fig 1B)

We next investigated whether the Gly116 residue of

Atg8L is essential for cleavage of its C-terminus by

changing Gly116 of Myc–Atg8Lwt)3xFLAG to Ala

by site-directed mutagenesis (Fig 1A,

Myc–Atg8L-GA)3xFLAG), and expressing the mutant protein in

HEK293 cells (Fig 1B, GA) The mobility of mutant

Myc–Atg8LGA)3xFLAG on SDS ⁄ PAGE was slower than that of wild-type Myc–Atg8Lwt)3xFLAG More-over, the mutant protein was recognized by immuno-blotting with both anti-Myc and anti-FLAG (Fig 1B) Similar results were obtained when the Gly116 residue was deleted by site-directed mutagenesis (Fig 1A, Myc–Atg8LDG)3xFLAG; Fig 1B, DG) These results suggest that the C-terminus of Atg8L is post-transla-tionally cleaved in HEK293 cells, and that Gly116 of Atg8L is essential for the cleavage of its C-terminus The cleaved form of Atg8L was designated Atg8L-I

Atg4B cleaves the C-terminus of Atg8L in vitro The three previously identified mammalian Atg8 homo-logs, LC3, GABARAP, and GATE-16, were shown to

be cleaved by human Atg4B (hAtg4B) in vitro [13,15] Although we showed that the C-terminus of Atg8L was cleaved soon after its translation in HEK293 cells, the enzyme responsible for this activity could not be identi-fied Therefore, we examined whether Atg4B has pro-teolytic activity on the C-terminus of Atg8L FLAG– hAtg4B was expressed in HEK293 cells, the cells were lysed, and the lysate was fractionated by ultracentrifuga-tion, with the resulting supernatant used as the enzyme mixture FLAG–hAtg4B in the supernatant was recog-nized by immunoblotting with anti-FLAG (Fig 1C, FLAG–hAtg4B) The substrate, wild-type thioredoxin (TRX)–Atg8L)3xFLAG, consisting of Atg8L with TRX at its N-terminus and the 3xFLAG epitope at its C-terminus, was expressed in Escherichia coli, and the supernatant of this cell lysate was used as the substrate solution When we incubated the two supernatants con-taining FLAG–hAtg4B with TRX–Atg8L)3xFLAG,

we found that the C-terminus of Atg8L was cleaved, as shown by immunoblotting with anti-FLAG (Fig 1C) Using anti-TRX, we confirmed that the N-terminal TRX tag within each substrate remains unchanged, indicating that the C-terminal FLAG tag was cleaved

by hAtg4B (Fig 1C) When an active site mutant of hAtg4B, hAtg4BC74A[15], was used instead of wild-type hAtg4B, little cleavage occurred (Fig 1D, lane 2 versus lane 1) When a mutant in which the Gly116 residue of Atg8L had been deleted, TRX–Atg8LDG)3xFLAG, was employed instead of the wild type, little C-terminal cleavage occurred (Fig 1D, lane 5 versus lane 1)

In addition to hAtg4B, hAtg4A⁄ hApg4A ⁄ autophag-in-2, hAtg4C⁄ hAutl1 ⁄ autophagin-3 and hAtg4D⁄ autophagin-4 have also been reported [16,22] Of these three Atg4 homologs, hAtg4A has been shown to cleave the C-terminus of GATE-16 [16], and autophag-in-3⁄ hAtg4C ⁄ hAutl1, but not hAtg4D, has been shown

to exert N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive proteolytic activity

Trang 3

on the synthetic substrate

Mca-Thr-Phe-Gly-Met-Dpa-NH2 [22] Therefore, hAtg4A and hAtg4C may also

cleave the C-terminus of Atg8L When hAtg4A or

hAtg4C was used instead of hAtg4B for in vitro

diges-tion, little cleavage of the C-terminal 3xFLAG tag of

TRX–Atg8L)3xFLAG occurred (Fig 1, lanes 3 and 4

versus lane 1) These results indicate that Atg4B

cleaves the C-terminus of Atg8L in vitro

Atg8L-I forms an E1-substrate intermediate with

human Atg7C572S

In the ubiquitlyation-like modification steps, an active

site Cys within an E1 enzyme temporally conjugates to

a substrate to form an E1-substrate intermediate via a

thiol–ester bond Owing to the rapid turnover of an

E1 reaction, it is difficult to recognize such an interme-diate in sufficient quantity When an active site Cys residue of human Atg7 is changed to Ser, a stable O-ester bond instead of a thiol–ester bond will be formed between the enzyme and substrate(s) Previ-ously, we showed that the mammalian Atg8 homologs LC3, GATE-16 and GABARAP form E1-substrate intermediates with an active site mutant human Atg7C572S, in which the active site Cys572 of human Atg7 was changed to Ser12 If Atg8L-I is a substrate

of human Atg7, Atg8L-I will form an E1-substrate intermediate with human Atg7C572S Therefore, we investigated whether Atg8L-I also forms an intermedi-ate with human Atg7C572S When Myc–Atg8Lwt )3x-FLAG and Atg7C572S were expressed together, an Atg7C572S–Myc–Atg8L (E1-substrate) intermediate was observed (Fig 2) This intermediate was also detected

by immunoblotting with Myc, but not with

anti-Fig 1 The C-terminus of Atg8L is cleaved in vivo and in vitro (A)

Schematic representation of mutant proteins of Myc–Atg8L

)3x-FLAG The arrowhead indicates a Gly residue predicted to be

essential for ubiquitylation-like reactions Myc–Atg8Lwt )3xFLAG

represents wild-type Atg8L protein tagged with the Myc epitope at

its N-terminus and with the 3xFLAG epitope at the C-terminus.

Myc–Atg8LGA )3xFLAG represents a mutant protein in which the

Gly116 of Atg8L was changed to Ala, and Myc–Atg8LDG )3xFLAG

represents a mutant protein in which the Gly116 of Atg8L was

deleted (B) Cleavage of the C-terminus of Atg8L Wild-type or

mutant Myc–Atg8L )3xFLAG proteins were transiently expressed in

HEK293 cells The cells were lysed, total proteins were separated

by SDS⁄ PAGE, and wild-type and mutant Myc–Atg8L )3xFLAG

were recognized by immunoblotting with Myc (a-Myc) and

anti-FLAG (a-anti-FLAG) wt, GA, and DG were the same as in (A) (C) In

vit-ro assay for Atg4B cleavage of the C-terminus of Atg8L Wild-type

TRX–Atg8L )3xFLAG was expressed in Escherichia coli; the cells

were lysed and centrifuged, and the supernatants were used as

the substrate The supernatants of HEK293 cells transfected with

pTag2B–hATG4B (hAtg4B wild) were used as enzymes; the

negat-ive control consisted of the supernatants of HEK293 cells

transfect-ed with pCMV–Tag2B (control) Following incubation of 1 lg of

enzyme solution with 10 lg of substrate solution for the indicated

times (incubation time), the reactions were stopped, and the total

proteins in each mixture were separated by SDS ⁄ PAGE TRX–

Atg8L )3xFLAG was recognized by immunoblotting with

anti-thiore-doxin (TRX), and FLAG–hAtg4B and the C-terminal 3-FLAG tag of

TRX–Atg8L )3xFLAG were recognized with anti-FLAG TRX–

Atg8L )3xFLAG, uncleaved form of TRX–Atg8L)3xFLAG; TRX–

Atg8L-I, cleaved form of TRX–Atg8L )3xFLAG; FLAG–hAtg4B,

FLAG-tagged Atg4B cysteine protease (D) In vitro assay for the

cleavage of the C-terminus of Atg8L by an active site mutant

hAtg4 C74A or other Atg4 homologs As an enzyme solution,

supern-atants of HEK293 cells expressing an active site mutant

hAtg4B C74A (hAtg4B C74A), wild-type hAtg4A (hAtg4A wild) or

wild-type hAtg4C (hAtg4C) were employed instead of wild-type

hAtg4B (hAtg4B wild) Supernatant containing mutant TRX–

Atg8LDG )3xFLAG (DG), in which the Gly116 of Atg8L was deleted,

was used as the substrate The enzyme solution and the substrate

solution were mixed and incubated for 30 min.

A

B

C

D

Trang 4

FLAG These results indicate that, like the other Atg8

homologs, Atg8L-I forms an E1-substrate intermediate

with human Atg7C572S

Atg8L-I forms an E2-substrate intermediate with

green fluorescent protein (GFP)–Atg3C264S; this is

dependent on Atg7

Owing to the rapid turnover of the E2 reaction, it is

difficult to recognize such an E2-substrate intermediate

with an E2-like enzyme When the active site Cys

resi-due of the E2-like enzyme is replaced by Ser, a stable

O-ester bond instead of a thiol–ester bond will be

formed between the enzyme and substrate(s); this is

dependent on an E1-like enzyme Previously, we

showed that LC3, GABARAP and GATE-16 form

E2-substrate intermediates with an active site mutant human Atg3C264S and that this activity was dependent

on human Atg7 [19] If Atg8-L is a substrate of Atg3, Atg8L-I will form an E2-substrate intermediate with human Atg3C264S that is dependent on Atg7 There-fore, we investigated whether Atg8L-I also forms an Atg7-dependent E2-substrate intermediate with human Atg3 and whether formation of this intermediate occurs via the Gly116 in Atg8L When wild-type Myc–Atg8Lwt)3xFLAG, GFP–Atg3C264S and wild-type Atg7 were expressed in HEK293 cells, a GFP– Atg3C264S–Myc–Atg8L (E2-substrate) intermediate was formed (Fig 3, lane 2) When mutant Myc– Atg8LDG)3xFLAG was substituted for wild-type Atg8L (Fig 3, lane 3), no intermediate was observed,

as demonstrated by immunoblotting with anti-GFP When Atg7 was not overexpressed (endogenous Atg7 alone), no intermediate was observed, while endo-genous Atg7 was detected by anti-Atg7 (Fig 3, lane

Fig 2 Atg8L-I forms an E1-substrate intermediate with human

Atg7C572S Myc-tagged Atg8L )3xFLAG (Myc–Atg8L)3xFLAG) was

transiently expressed with wild-type (Atg7 wt) or mutant human

Atg7 (Atg7 C572S) The cells were lysed, the proteins were

separ-ated by SDS ⁄ PAGE, and human Atg7 was recognized by

immuno-blotting with anti-human Atg7 (WB:a-Atg7), while Myc–Atg8L-I was

recognized by immunoblotting with anti-Myc (WB:a-Myc) Atg7–

Atg8L-I intermediate, E1-substrate intermediate between human

Atg7C572Sand Atg8L; Atg7, human Atg7; Myc–Atg8L-I, Myc-tagged

Atg8L-I.

Fig 3 Atg8L-I forms an E2-substrate intermediate with human Atg3 C264S , which is dependent on human Atg7 Myc–Atg8Lwt )3x-FLAG (wt) was transiently expressed together with green fluores-cent protein (GFP)–Atg3C264S in the presence (Atg7+) or absence (Atg7–) of human Atg7 DG represents mutant Myc–Atg8LDG )3x-FLAG lacking the Gly116 of Atg8L (see Fig 1A) After lysing the cells, total proteins were separated by SDS ⁄ PAGE Atg7 was recognized by immunoblotting with anti-human Atg7 (WB:a-Atg7), GFP–Atg3 C264S and its E2-substrate intermediate were recognized with anti-GFP (WB:a-GFP), and Myc-tagged Atg8L proteins were recognized by immunoblotting with anti-Myc (WB:a-Myc) The faint band in lane 3 (DG) of the middle panel (WB:a-GFP) is GFP– Atg3 C264S -endogenous Atg8 homolog intermediate(s).

Trang 5

1) These results indicate that Atg8L-I forms an

Atg7-dependent E2-substrate intermediate with human Atg3

via its Gly116

Atg8L-II is increased in the presence of E64d and

pepstatin A, inhibitors of lysosomal proteases,

in HeLa cells

LC3-I and GABARAP-I have been shown to be

modi-fied by Atg7 and Atg3 to form the respective protein–

phospholipid conjugates, LC3-II and GABARAP-PL

[15] We have reported the accumulation of LC3-II

and GABARAP-PL in HeLa cells incubated with

E64d [23], a membrane-permeable inhibitor of

cathep-sins B, H, and L, and pepstatin A [24], an inhibitor of

cathepsins D and E, for 24 h under nutrient-rich

con-ditions [15,25] These results suggest that a modified

form of Atg8L-I may accumulate under the same

con-ditions When HeLa cells expressing Myc–Atg8L were

incubated with E64d and pepstatin A for 24 h under

nutrient-rich conditions, LC3-II and GABARAP-PL

accumulated (Fig 4A, WB:a-LC3 and a-GABARAP)

Under these conditions, we observed two bands by

immunoblotting with anti-Myc (Fig 4A, WB:a-Myc)

One band corresponded to Myc–Atg8L-I, while the

other showed faster mobility This second band,

repre-senting a modified form of Atg8L, was designated

Atg8L-II

We have also shown that the modified forms of

LC3 and GABARAP, LC3-II and GABARAP-PL,

are present in the pellet after subcellular

fraction-ation [15] Therefore, we hypothesized that, if

Atg8L-II is a modified form and not a degradation

product of Atg8L-I, it would be present in the pellet

of inhibitor-treated HeLa cells Therefore, we

centri-fuged cell lysates at 100 000 g for 1 h and examined

the subcellular localization of Myc–Atg8L-I and

Myc–Atg8L-II by immunoblotting with anti-Myc

Our results indicated that Myc–Atg8L-II was present

in the pellet, whereas Myc–Atg8L-I was present in

the supernatant (Fig 4B), suggesting that Myc–

Atg8L-II is a modified form of Myc–Atg8L-I, and

not a degradation product

We next investigated the intracellular localization of

Atg8L-II under these conditions using cyan fluorescent

protein (CFP)–Atg8L HeLa cells expressing both

CFP–Atg8L and yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)–

LC3 were cultured under nutrient-rich conditions in

the presence of E64d and pepstatin A for 24 h, and

punctate signals of both CFP–Atg8L (Fig 4C,e,h,k)

and YFP–LC3 (Fig 4C,d,g,j) were observed by

fluor-escent microscopy Like Myc–Atg8L, CFP–Atg8L can

form E1-substrate and E2-substrate intermediates with

human Atg7C572S and human Atg3C264S, respectively (Fig 4D,E), and little degradation of CFP–Atg8L was observed even in the presence of these inhibitors for

24 h under nutrient-rich conditions (Fig 4F), indica-ting that the fluorescence signal reflects intact tagged protein Merging of the images indicated that most of the puncta of CFP–Atg8L were colocalized with those

of YFP–LC3 (Fig 4,f,I,l) In the absence of inhibitors, only a few puncta of either type were observed (Fig 4C,a–c)

Little Atg8L-II accumulates under conditions of starvation even in the presence of E64d and pepstatin A in HeLa cells

LC3-I is significantly lipidated to form LC3-II under conditions of starvation [10], and LC3-II is degraded

in the lysosome [25] Therefore, in the presence of E64d and pepstatin A, LC3-II shows significant accu-mulation under conditions of starvation [25] It is poss-ible that, like LC3, Atg8L is modified to Atg8L-II under conditions of starvation Therefore, we investi-gated whether Atg8L-II accumulates in HeLa cells expressing Myc–Atg8L)3xFLAG incubated in Krebs– Ringer buffered medium for 4 h under conditions of starvation in the presence of E64d and pepstatin A, conditions under which LC3-II has been reported to accumulate [25] (Fig 5, LC3-II) However, little Atg8L-II accumulation was observed (Fig 5, lane 4 versus lane 3) Even when cells were incubated with the inhibitors under nutrient-rich conditions for a short time—4 h compared with 24 h (Fig 4A)—little accumulation of Atg8L-II occurred (Fig 5, lane 2)

Discussion

Here, we have shown that Atg8L is a substrate of reac-tions mediated by human Atg4B, Atg7, and Atg3 We found that the C-terminus of Atg8L is post-transla-tionally cleaved and that the Gly116 in Atg8L is essen-tial for this reaction, which is mediated by human Atg4B, a cysteine protease, in vitro We also found that Atg8L forms an E1-substrate intermediate with an E1-like enzyme, the active site mutant Atg7C572S, and

an E2-substrate intermediate with an E2-like enzyme, the active site mutant Atg3C264S, with the latter reac-tion dependent on Atg7 All these reacreac-tions are similar

to a series of reactions of three other mammalian Atg8 homologs: LC3, GABARAP, and GATE-16 In addi-tion, we showed that a modified form of Atg8L, Atg8L-II, accumulates in HeLa cells in the presence of lysosomal protease inhibitors under nutrient-rich con-ditions, comparable to the accumulation of LC3-II

Trang 6

B

C

Fig 4 Atg8L-II, a modified form of Atg8L, accumulates in HeLa cells in the presence of inhibitors of lysosomal proteases, E64d and pepstatin A (A) Accumulation of Atg8L-II in the presence of E64d and pepstatin A Myc–Atg8L )3xFLAG was transiently expressed in HeLa cells, and the transfectants were incubated for 24 h in the presence (+) or absence (–) of E64d and pepstatin A The cells were lysed, and total proteins were separated by SDS ⁄ PAGE Endogenous LC3 and GABARAP were recognized by immunoblotting with anti-LC3 and 4-aminobutyrate A -receptor associated protein (GABARAP), respectively (WB:a-LC3 and a-GABARAP) Myc–Atg8L was recognized with anti-Myc (WB:a-Myc) (B) Subcellular localization of Myc–Atg8L-II Cell lysates of inhibitor-treated HeLa cells (A, E64d and pepstatin A+) were fractionated into pellet (Ppt) and soluble (Sup) fractions by ultracentrifugation at 100 000 g for 1 h [12,15] LC3-I, soluble unlip-idated form of LC3; LC3-II, lipunlip-idated membrane-bound form of LC3; GABARAP-I, unlipunlip-idated form of GABARAP; GABARAP-PL, lipunlip-idated form of GABARAP; Myc–Atg8L-I, soluble form of Myc–Atg8L; Myc–Atg8L-II, membrane-bound form of Myc–Atg8L (C) Intracellular local-ization of cyan fluorescent protein (CFP)–Atg8L HeLa cells expressing both CFP–Atg8L and yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)–LC3 were cultured in the absence (dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)) or presence of E64d and pepstatin A (E64d and pepstatin A) for 24 h After fixing, cyan and yellow fluorescence in HeLa cells were observed with a Zeiss Axioplan2 fluorescence microscope with filters XF114-2 and XF104-2 The deconvoluted images are shown in (C) In a, d, g, and j, yellow fluorescent images correspond to YFP–LC3 In b, e, h, and

k, cyan fluorescent images correspond to CFP–Atg8L Merged images (Merge) are shown in e, f, i, and l Arrowheads indicate colocaliz-ation of YFP–LC3 and CFP–Atg8L (D) Formcolocaliz-ation of an E1-substrate intermediate with Atg7C572Sand CFP–Atg8L CFP–Atg8L was trans-iently expressed with wild-type (Atg7 wt) or mutant human Atg7 (Atg7 C572S) The cells were lysed, the proteins were separated by SDS ⁄ PAGE, and human Atg7 was recognized by immunoblotting with anti-human Atg7 (WB:a-Atg7), and CFP–Atg8L was recognized by immunoblotting with anti-GFP (WB:a-GFP) Atg7–Atg8L intermediate, E1-substrate intermediate between human Atg7C572S and Atg8L; Atg7, human Atg7; CFP–Atg8L, CFP-tagged Atg8L (E) Formation of an E2-substrate intermediate with Atg3 C264S S and CFP–Atg8L CFP– Atg8L was transiently expressed together with GFP–Atg3 C264S in the presence of human Atg7 (Atg7+) After lysing the cells, total pro-teins were separated by SDS ⁄ PAGE Atg7 was recognized by immunoblotting with anti-human Atg7 (WB:a-Atg7), GFP–Atg3 C264S and its E2-substrate intermediate were recognized with anti-Atg3 (WB:a-Atg3), and CFP–Atg8L was recognized by immunoblotting with anti-Atg8L (WB:a-Atg8L) (F) There was little degradation of CFP–Atg8L in the presence of E64d and pepstatin A for 24 h under nutrient-rich condit-ions CFP–Atg8L and YFP–LC3 were transiently expressed in HeLa cells, and the transfectant was incubated for 24 h in the presence (+)

or absence (–) of E64d and pepstatin A The cells were lysed, and total proteins were separated by SDS ⁄ PAGE YFP–LC3 and CFP–Atg8L were recognized by immunoblotting with anti-GFP (WB:a-GFP) CFP–Atg8L was recognized with anti-Atg8L (WB:a-Atg8L) Positions of molecular weight markers for SDS ⁄ PAGE are indicated on the right of the panel.

Trang 7

and GABARAP-PL under identical conditions

More-over, we found that Atg8L-II was fractionated in the

pellet These results indicate that Atg8L is a substrate

of Atg4B, Atg7, and Atg3, and that Atg8L is the

authentic fourth modifier in the mammalian Atg8

con-jugation system Previously, we showed that LC3-II

and GABARAP-PL are protein–phospholipid

conju-gates in vivo [15], and that these two conjuconju-gates, as

well as GATE-16-II, are localized to a membrane

compartment [10,12] Like LC3-II and

GABARAP-PL, Atg8L-II was fractionated in the pelletable

fraction, suggesting that Atg8L-II may be a

protein–phospholipid conjugate that is localized to a membrane compartment

The modified form, Myc–Atg8L-II, was observed only in the presence of E64d and pepstatin A for 24 h under nutrient-rich conditions (Fig 4A), whereas little Myc–Atg8L was observed for a shorter period (4 h) even in the presence of these inhibitors In contrast, LC3-II accumulates in the presence of E64 and pepstatin

A within only 4 h under both nutrient-rich and starva-tion condistarva-tions There are two possible reasons for the low level of Myc–Atg8L-II accumulation for 4 h in the presence of these inhibitors The first is that

F

Fig 4 (Continued).

Trang 8

tion of Atg8L-I to Atg8L-II may occur much more

slowly than that of LC3-I to LC3-II Therefore, Myc–

Atg8L-II was observed only after a longer incubation

time (24 h) in the presence of E64d and pepstatin A

The other possibility is that Myc–Atg8L-II may be very

unstable compared with LC3-II We have reported that

Atg4B is a delipidating enzyme for LC3-II and

GABA-RAP-PL in addition to being a cysteine protease that

cleaves the C-termini of mammalian Atg8 homologs

Therefore, if Atg4B delipidates Myc–Atg8L-II more

effectively than LC3-II, there will be less accumulation

of Myc–Atg8L-II compared with LC3-II These points

will be clarified in future studies by in vitro assays of

lipidation and delipidation of Atg8L

Experimental procedures

Materials, and biochemical and molecular

biological techniques

Molecular biological and biochemical techniques were

per-formed as described [25] To clone mouse Atg8L cDNA by

PCR, we used high-fidelity KOD plus DNA polymerase (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) A plasmid containing mouse Atg8L cDNA was transfected into HEK293 cells with Lipofectamine 2000 reagent according to the manufac-turer’s protocol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) E coli strain DH5a cells, the hosts for plasmids and protein expression, were grown in Luria broth medium in the presence of anti-biotics as required Restriction enzymes were purchased from Toyobo and New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA) Oligonucleotides were synthesized by Invitrogen pGEM-T was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI), and p3xFLAG–CMV14 was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO)

Cloning of mouse Atg8L cDNA and site-directed mutagenesis

A DNA fragment encoding the entire open reading frame

of ATG8L, according to a cDNA sequence in GenBank (accession number: BG244294) [21], was amplified by high-fidelity PCR from a Marathon ready mouse brain cDNA library (BD Biosciences Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) and inserted into pGEM-T The resulting plasmid was designa-ted pGEM–mATG8L

Using the Gene-Editor in vitro site-directed mutagenesis system (Promega) and the plasmid pGEM–mATG8L, Gly116 in mouse Atg8L was replaced by Ala in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol, and the resulting plasmid was designated pGEM–mATG8LG116A Gly116 in mouse Atg8L of pGEM–mATG8L was deleted by site-directed mutagenesis, and the resulting plasmid was designated pGEM–mATG8LDG Mammalian expression vectors for N-terminal Myc-tagged and C-terminal 3xFLAG-tagged versions of Atg8L, Myc–Atg8Lwt)3xFLAG,

Myc–Atg8L-GA)3xFLAG and Myc–Atg8LDG)3xFLAG were con-structed from pGEM–mATG8L and p3xFLAG–CMV14 by high-fidelity PCR, and designated pMyc–mATG8L) 3xFLAG, pMyc–mATG8LGA)3xFLAG, and pMyc– mATG8LDG)3xFLAG, respectively An expression vector for N-terminal TRX-tagged and C-terminal 3xFLAG-tagged Atg8L in E coli, TRX–Atg8L)3xFLAG, was con-structed based on pThioHisA (Invitrogen) and designated pTRX–ATG8L)3xFLAG A mammalian expression vector for N-terminal CFP-tagged Atg8L designated pCFP– ATG8L was generated by inserting the open reading frame

of mAtg8L excised from pGEM–mATG8L into pCFP-C1 (BD Biosciences Clontech) The DNA sequences of new constructs were confirmed using a ABI PRISMTM310 Gen-etic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) The expression vectors pCMV–hAPG7, pCMV–hAPG7CS, pGFP–hAPG3, pGFP–hAPG3CS, pTag2B–HsATG4B, pTag2B–HsATG4BC74A, pTag2B–HsATG4A and pTag2B– HsAUTL1 for human Atg7, mutant Atg7C572S, GFP–Atg3, mutant GFP–Atg3C264S, wild-type FLAG–hAtg4B, mutant FLAG–hAtg4BC74A, type FLAG–hAtg4A and

wild-Fig 5 There was little modification of Atg8L under conditions of

starvation, even in the presence of inhibitors of lysosomal proteases.

Myc–Atg8L )3xFLAG was transiently expressed in HeLa cells The

transfectant was transferred to Krebs–Ringer buffered medium

(KRB, 4 h, starvation) or Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium

(DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (DMEM, 10% fetal

bovine serum, nutrient-rich), and incubated for 4 h in the presence

(+) or absence (–) of inhibitors Little Myc–Atg8L-II was detected by

immunoblotting with anti-Myc under either condition Endogenous

LC3 was recognized by immunoblotting with antibodies to LC3 As a

control, the membrane was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue.

LC3-II, LC3–phospholipid conjugate.

Trang 9

type FLAG–hAtg4C⁄ AutL1, respectively, were as described

[15,17,19]

Cell culture

The HEK293 and HeLa cell lines were purchased from the

ATCC (Manassas, VA) and cultured in 60-mm dishes in

Dulbeccos’s modified Eagles’s medium (DMEM,

Invitro-gen) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (InvitroInvitro-gen) in a

humidified 5% CO2atmosphere at 37C

Antibodies

For preparation of antiserum against mouse Atg8L, rabbits

were immunized with a TRX–Atg8L fusion protein

Anti-human GABARAP, LC3, Atg7 and Atg3 were prepared

and purified as described [12,17,19,26] Anti-Myc was

pur-chased from Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA), anti-FLAG

M2 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, anti-TRX was

pur-chased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA),

and anti-GFP was purchased from BD Biosciences Clontech

Immunoblotting analyses

Protein concentrations were determined using the

bicincho-ninic acid protein assay reagent (Pierce, Rockford, IL)

Immunoblotting analyses were carried out according to

standard protocols using a chemiluminescent method with

SuperSignal West Dura Extended Duration Substrate or

SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce)

In vitro assay for cleavage of the C-terminus of

TRX–Atg8L)3xFLAG by Atg4B

The in vitro assay for cleavage of the C-terminus of mouse

Atg8L was performed as previously described [15]

Fluorescence microscopy

HeLa cells expressing YFP–hLC3 and CFP–mAtg8L were

fixed according to the manufacturer’s protocol (BD

Bio-sciences Clontech) Briefly, after transfection of pYFP–LC3

and pCFP–ATG8L into HeLa cells using

Lipofecta-mine2000 (Invitrogen), cells were incubated for 24 h under

nutrient-rich conditions in the presence or absence of E64d

and pepstatin A Thereafter, cells were washed twice with

NaCl⁄ Pi, and fixed in NaCl⁄ Pi containing 4%

paraformal-dehyde for 10 min at room temperature Fixed cells were

washed three times with NaCl⁄ Pi, and then mounted on

slide-glasses with SlowFade Light antifade reagent (50%

glycerol solution) (Invitrogen) Fluorescence of YFP and

CFP in the cells was monitored with a Zeiss Axioplan2

fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY)

equipped with an ORCA-ER CCD camera (Hamamatsu

Photonics, Tokyo, Japan) For deconvolution of the ima-ges, a Zeiss Axioplan2 fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss) and an Aqua C-imaging system (Hamamatsu Photonics) were employed

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by grants-in-aid

15590254 (to IT), 09680629 (to TU) and 12470040 (to EK) for Scientific Research, and grant-in-aid 12146205 (to EK) for Scientific Research on Priority Areas from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Cul-ture of Japan, and The Science Research Promotion Fund from the Japan Private School Promotion Foun-dation (to EK)

References

1 Ohsumi Y (2001) Molecular dissection of autophagy: two ubiquitin-like systems Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2, 211–216

2 Tsukada M & Ohsumi Y (1993) Isolation and character-ization of autophagy-defective mutants of Saccharo-myces cerevisiae FEBS Lett 333, 169–174

3 Ichimura Y, Kirisako T, Takao T, Satomi Y, Shimonishi

Y, Ishihara N, Mizushima N, Tanida I, Kominami E, Ohsumi M, et al (2000) A ubiquitin-like system mediates protein lipidation Nature 408, 488–492

4 Kirisako T, Ichimura Y, Okada H, Kabeya Y,

Mizushi-ma N, Yoshimori T, Ohsumi M, Takao T, Noda T & Ohsumi Y (2000) The reversible modification regulates the membrane-binding state of Apg8⁄ Aut7 essential for autophagy and the cytoplasm to vacuole targeting path-way J Cell Biol 151, 263–276

5 Mizushima N, Noda T, Yoshimori T, Tanaka Y, Ishii T, George MD, Klionsky DJ, Ohsumi M & Ohsumi Y (1998) A protein conjugation system essential for auto-phagy Nature 395, 395–398

6 Kim J, Dalton VM, Eggerton KP, Scott SV & Klionsky

DJ (1999) Apg7p⁄ Cvt2p is required for the cytoplasm-to-vacuole targeting, macroautophagy, and peroxisome degradation pathways Mol Biol Cell 10, 1337–1351

7 Yuan W, Stromhaug PE & Dunn WA Jr (1999) Glu-cose-induced autophagy of peroxisomes in Pichia pas-torisrequires a unique E1-like protein Mol Biol Cell 10, 1353–1366

8 Tanida I, Mizushima N, Kiyooka M, Ohsumi M, Ueno

T, Ohsumi Y & Kominami E (1999) Apg7p⁄ Cvt2p: a novel protein-activating enzyme essential for autophagy Mol Biol Cell 10, 1367–1379

9 Mann SS & Hammarback JA (1994) Molecular characterization of light chain 3 A microtubule binding subunit of MAP1A and MAP1B J Biol Chem 269, 11492–11497

Trang 10

10 Kabeya Y, Mizushima N, Ueno T, Yamamoto A,

Kiri-sako T, Noda T, Kominami E, Ohsumi Y & Yoshimori T

(2000) LC3, a mammalian homologue of yeast Apg8p, is

localized in autophagosome membranes after processing

EMBO J 19, 5720–5728

11 Wang H, Bedford FK, Brandon NJ, Moss SJ & Olsen

RW (1999) GABAA-receptor-associated protein links

GABAAreceptors and the cytoskeleton Nature 397,

69–72

12 Tanida I, Komatsu M, Ueno T & Kominami E (2003)

GATE-16 and GABARAP are authentic modifiers

mediated by Apg7 and Apg3 Biochem Biophys Res

Commun 300, 637–644

13 Kabeya Y, Mizushima N, Yamamoto A,

Oshitani-Okamoto S, Ohsumi Y & Yoshimori T (2004) LC3,

GABARAP and GATE16 localize to autophagosomal

membrane depending on form-II formation J Cell Sci

117, 2805–2812

14 Sagiv Y, Legesse-Miller A, Porat A & Elazar Z (2000)

GATE-16, a membrane transport modulator, interacts

with NSF and the Golgi v-SNARE GOS-28 EMBO J

19, 1494–1504

15 Tanida I, Sou YS, Ezaki J, Minematsu-Ikeguchi N,

Ueno T & Kominami E (2004) HsAtg4B⁄ HsApg4B ⁄

autophagin-1 cleaves the carboxyl termini of three

human Atg8 homologues and delipidates

microtubule-associated protein light chain 3- and GABAA

receptor-associated protein–phospholipid conjugates J Biol

Chem 279, 36268–36276

16 Scherz-Shouval R, Sagiv Y, Shorer H & Elazar Z (2003)

The COOH terminus of GATE-16, an intra-Golgi

trans-port modulator, is cleaved by the human cysteine

pro-tease HsApg4A J Biol Chem 278, 14053–14058

17 Tanida I, Tanida-Miyake E, Ueno T & Kominami E

(2001) The human homolog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Apg7p is a protein-activating enzyme for multiple

sub-strates including human Apg12p, GATE-16, GABARAP,

and MAP-LC3 J Biol Chem 276, 1701–1706

18 Tanida I, Tanida-Miyake E, Nishitani T, Komatsu M,

Yamazaki H, Ueno T & Kominami E (2002) Murine

Apg12p has a substrate preference for murine Apg7p over three Apg8p homologs Biochem Biophys Res Commun 292, 256–262

19 Tanida I, Tanida-Miyake E, Komatsu M, Ueno T & Kominami E (2002) Human Apg3p⁄ Aut1p homologue

is an authentic E2 enzyme for multiple substrates, GATE-16, GABARAP, and MAP-LC3, and facilitates the conjugation of hApg12p to hApg5p J Biol Chem

277, 13739–13744

20 Bampton E, Goemans C, Dhevahi Niranjan D, Mizu-shima N & Tolkovsky A (2005) The dynamics of auto-phagy visualised in live cells: from autophagosome formation to fusion with endo⁄ lysosomes Autophagy 1, 23–36

21 Hemelaar J, Lelyveld VS, Kessler BM & Ploegh HL (2003) A single protease, Apg4B, is specific for the autophagy-related ubiquitin-like proteins GATE-16, MAP1-LC3, GABARAP, and Apg8L J Biol Chem 278, 51841–51850

22 Marino G, Uria JA, Puente XS, Quesada V, Bordallo J

& Lopez-Otin C (2003) Human autophagins, a family

of cysteine proteinases potentially implicated in cell degradation by autophagy J Biol Chem 278, 3671–3678

23 Ueno T, Ishidoh K, Mineki R, Tanida I, Murayama K, Kadowaki M & Kominami E (1999) Autolysosomal membrane-associated betaine homocysteine methyltrans-ferase Limited degradation fragment of a sequestered cytosolic enzyme monitoring autophagy J Biol Chem

274, 15222–15229

24 Dean RT (1977) Lysosomes and protein degradation Acta Biol Med Ger 36, 1815–1820

25 Tanida I, Minematsu-Ikeguchi N, Ueno T & Kominami

E (2005) Lysosomal turnover, but not a cellular level, of endogenous LC3 is a marker for autophagy Autophagy

1, 84–91

26 Asanuma K, Tanida I, Shirato I, Ueno T, Takahara H, Nishitani T, Kominami E & Tomino Y (2003) MAP-LC3, a promising autophagosomal marker, is processed during the differentiation and recovery of podocytes from PAN nephrosis FASEB J 17, 1165–1167

Ngày đăng: 30/03/2014, 11:20

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm