1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Báo cáo khoa học: Specific TSC22 domain transcripts are hypertonically induced and alternatively spliced to protect mouse kidney cells during osmotic stress pptx

16 295 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề Specific TSC22 Domain Transcripts Are Hypertonically Induced And Alternatively Spliced To Protect Mouse Kidney Cells During Osmotic Stress
Tác giả Diego F. Fiol, Sally K. Mak, Dietmar Kültz
Trường học University of California, Davis
Chuyên ngành Animal Science
Thể loại báo cáo khoa học
Năm xuất bản 2006
Thành phố Davis
Định dạng
Số trang 16
Dung lượng 0,94 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Expression of TSC22D family members in kidney mouse and mIMCD3 cells We analyzed the expression of the six mouse TSC22D transcripts in kidney to learn whether any of them functionally re

Trang 1

induced and alternatively spliced to protect mouse kidney cells during osmotic stress

Diego F Fiol, Sally K Mak* and Dietmar Ku¨ltz

Physiological Genomics Group, Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA, USA

In the mammalian kidney, the papilla is routinely

exposed to severe hyperosmolality and to large changes

in interstitial osmolality These stressful conditions are

a prerequisite for operation of the urinary

concentra-ting mechanism and maintenance of systemic salt

and water balance Thus, renal papillary (and outer

medullary) cells have special mechanisms to adapt to variable and severe hyperosmolality Cellular adapta-tion to hyperosmotic stress is controlled via a complex array of cellular signaling mechanisms that modify gene and protein expression and protein function

to promote osmoprotection [1] Such signaling

Keywords

aldosterone; hyperosmotic stress;

hypertonicity; kidney; mIMCD3 cells

Correspondence

D Ku¨ltz, Physiological Genomics Group,

Department of Animal Science, University of

California, Davis, One Shields Avenue,

Davis, CA 95616, USA

Fax: +1 530 752 0175

Tel: +1 530 752 2991

E-mail: dkueltz@ucdavis.edu

*Present address

The Parkinson’s Institute, Sunnyvale, CA,

USA

(Received 28 July 2006, revised 23 October

2006, accepted 3 November 2006)

doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05569.x

We recently cloned a novel osmotic stress transcription factor 1 (OSTF1) from gills of euryhaline tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) and demonstra-ted that acute hyperosmotic stress transiently increases OSTF1 mRNA and protein abundance [Fiol DF, Ku¨ltz D (2005) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

102, 927–932] In this study, a genome-wide search was conducted to iden-tify nine distinct mouse transforming growth factor (TGF)-b-stimulated clone 22 domain (TSC22D) transcripts, including glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper (GILZ), that are orthologs of OSTF1 These nine TSC22D transcripts are encoded at four loci on chromosomes 14 (TSC22D1, two splice variants), 3 (TSC22D2, four splice variants), X (TSC22D3, two splice variants), and 5 (TSC22D4) All nine mouse TSC22D transcripts are expressed in renal cortex, medulla and papilla, and in the mIMCD3 cell line The two TSC22D3 transcripts (including GILZ) are upregulated by aldosterone but not by hyperosmolality in mIMCD3 cells In contrast, TSC22D4 is stably upregulated by hyperosmolality in mIMCD3 cells and increased in renal papilla compared with cortex Moreover, all four TSC22D2 transcripts are transiently upregulated by hyperosmolality and resemble tilapia OSTF1 in this regard All TSC22D2 transcripts depend

on hypertonicity as the signal for their upregulation and are unresponsive

to increases in cell-permeable osmolytes mRNA stabilization is the mech-anism for TSC22D2 upregulation by hyperosmolality Overexpression of TSC22D2–4 in mIMCD3 cells confers protection towards osmotic stress,

as evidenced by a 2.7-fold increase in cell survival after 3 days at

600 mOsmolÆkg)1 Based on variable responsiveness to aldosterone and hyperosmolality in kidney cells we conclude that mouse TSC22D genes have diverse physiological functions TSC22D2 and TSC22D4 are involved

in adaptation of renal cells to hypertonicity suggesting that they represent important elements of osmosensory signal transduction in mouse kidney cells

Abbreviations

GILZ, glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper; OSTF1, osmotic stress transcription factor 1; TGF, transforming growth factor; TonEBP, tonicity-response element binding protein.

Trang 2

mechanisms stimulate accumulation of the compatible

organic osmolytes glycine-betaine, myo-inositol,

tau-rine, sorbitol, and glycerophosphorylcholine [2–4]

Accumulation of glycine-betaine, inositol, and sorbitol

is transcriptionally regulated and depends, at least in

part, on the transcription factor tonicity-response

ele-ment binding protein (TonEBP) [5] TonEBP also

acti-vates additional genes that are important for osmotic

stress adaptation, including HSP70 and UT-A urea

transporter [6,7] In addition to the TonEBP pathway,

hyperosmolality activates a very complex network of

intracellular signaling pathways in renal medullary

cells, including MAP kinase pathways [8], the p53

pathway [9], DNA-dependent protein kinases [10], and

protein kinase A-dependent pathways [11] Thus, the

response of mammalian kidney cells to hyperosmotic

stress is highly complex and involves many different

pathways and elements Proper understanding of the

cellular hyperosmotic stress response enabling

compu-tational modeling of this response is highly desirable

because it would open avenues for manipulating

stress-resistance networks of cells in states of renal disease

and disorders of water and electrolyte balance

How-ever, better knowledge about key elements of

osmo-sensory signal transduction pathways and their

interactions within osmotic stress signaling networks is

required before in silico models that correctly reflect

and predict cellular responses to osmotic stress can be

devised

We recently cloned a novel immediate early gene

osmotic stress transcription factor 1 (OSTF1) that is

involved in the cellular osmotic stress response of gill

cells of euryhaline tilapia [12] In this fish, OSTF1

mRNA and protein levels rapidly and transiently

increase in response to hyperosmotic stress, peaking at

2 and 4 h, respectively The rapid and transient

activa-tion kinetics is characteristic of immediate early genes

OSTF1 belongs to the TSC22D family of leucine

zip-per proteins that are thought to be transcription

fac-tors in mammalian cells In mouse tissues, TSC22D

genes are regulated by glucocorticoids and

transform-ing growth factor b (TGF-b) [13,14] However, nothtransform-ing

is known about the osmotic regulation of any mouse TSC22D isoform In addition, a systematic genome-wide analysis of mouse TSC22D gene products, identi-fying all family members, is lacking

In this study, we identified nine murine TSC22D transcripts and investigated their regulation by hyper-osmolality and aldosterone, which is a mineralocorti-coid hormone important for modulation of the urinary concentrating mechanism Moreover, TSC22D2 was identified as the closest functional mouse ortholog of tilapia OSTF1 and the mechanism and physiological significance of hyperosmotic upregulation of this gene was analyzed

Results

Identification of TSC22D family members in the mouse genome

We recently cloned tilapia OSTF1 and showed that it

is a rapidly induced osmotic stress transcription factor [12] To identify possible functional homologs of tila-pia OSTF1 in mammals, we carried out an exhaustive search of the complete annotated mouse genome using the ENSEMBL database (http://www.ensembl.org) [15] This search yielded six gene products with expec-tation values ranging from 6.1e-69 to 3.2e-21 These proteins are the products of transcripts encoded at four different loci (Table 1) In order to avoid ambi-guity, we follow the recently updated and unified MGD nomenclature guidelines for TSC22D proteins

in this study (Mouse Genome Informatics) [16] TSC22D1-1 and TSC22D1-2 are splice variants that are located on chromosome 14, TSC22D2 is located

on chromosome 3, TSC22D3-1 and TSC22D3-2 are splice variants that are located on chromosome X, and TSC22D4 is located on chromosome 5 (Table 1) Although two of these proteins have been previously described as TSC-22 (TSC22D1-2) and glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper (GILZ) (TSC22D3-2), the other four have not been characterized or only referred to as TSC22-like or GILZ-like proteins Multiple sequence Table 1 Mouse OSTF1-like predicted transcripts aa, amino acid; nt, nucleotide.

Transcript Name

Chromosome location Accession EMBL ENSEMBL

Length (aa) (nt)

OSTF1 homology

Trang 3

alignment shows that the six mouse proteins and

tilapia OSTF1 share a conserved region of 70 amino

acids, which comprises the TSC22D family signature

motif and a leucine-zipper domain The N- and

C-ter-mini are least conserved in all proteins In particular,

N-termini are highly heterogeneous, accounting for

variability in total protein lengths ranging from 124 to

1057 amino acids (Table 1, Fig 1) The protein with

the highest overall sequence similarity to tilapia

OSTF1 is TSC22D3-1, based on highest degree of

con-servation of the N-terminus (Fig 1)

Expression of TSC22D family members in kidney

mouse and mIMCD3 cells

We analyzed the expression of the six mouse TSC22D

transcripts in kidney to learn whether any of them

functionally resembles tilapia OSTF1 Levels of

expres-sion of the six transcripts were determined by

quantita-tive PCR in three regions of the kidney that are

characterized by increasing interstitial osmolality in the

order from cortex (lowest) to medulla (intermediate) to

papilla (highest) All six transcripts are expressed in all

three regions of the kidney Renal TSC22D2 is most

abundant being expressed at levels that are between

one and two orders of magnitude lower than that of

the highly abundant ribosomal protein L32 (Fig 2)

The level of expression of TSC22D1-2 and TSC22D2

is similar in cortex, medulla, and papilla (Fig 2)

However, TSC22D3-1, TSC22D3-2, and TSC22D4 are

significantly more abundant in papilla, whereas

TSC22D1-1 is more abundant in cortex The data

suggest that hyperosmolality could potentially be responsible for altering the expression of four TSC22D transcripts The level of expression of all six transcripts was also determined in mIMCD3 cells All six tran-scripts are expressed in mIMCD3 cells and expression levels are similar to those in mouse kidney medulla

in vivo(data not shown) Therefore, mIMCD3 cells are

a good model for evaluating mechanisms of regulation

of the mouse TSC22D transcripts

B

A

Fig 1 Schematic structure (A) and multiple sequence alignment of the TSC22D motif (B) of tilapia OSTF1 and mouse TSC22D family mem-bers identified by a genome-wide search Large gray cylinders correspond to the conserved TSC22 ⁄ leucine zipper motif Smaller white cylin-ders represent local regions of high homology Residues shaded in darker tones correspond to higher level of homology in the alignment.

Fig 2 Relative expression levels of mouse TSC22D transcripts in kidney papilla, medulla and cortex Expression levels of TSC22D transcripts were determined by quantitative PCR C, cortex; M, medulla; P, papilla Results are depicted as means ± SEM of three independent experiments Significant differences between kidney regions are indicated by asterisks (P < 0.05).

Trang 4

Regulation of TSC22D transcripts in mIMCD3

cells by hyperosmotic stress and aldosterone

The responsiveness of TSC22D transcripts to

hyper-osmotic stress and⁄ or aldosterone treatment was

determined in mIMCD3 cells in 24-h time course

experiments Acute hypertonicity increases the

expres-sion of TSC22D2, TSC22D4 and TSC22D3-2 Of

interest, TSC22D2 is elevated early and transiently,

showing increases of 2.6- and 3.1-fold at 4 and 6 h of treatment, respectively, and returning to baseline levels within 12 h In contrast, TSC22D3-2 and TSC22D4 show a slower but more stable upregulation, increasing three- and sixfold, respectively, after 24 h of treatment (Fig 3) These results are in agreement with higher levels of TSC22D3-2 and TSC22D4 in renal papilla

in vivo (see previous paragraph, Fig 2) Aldosterone induces a rapid increase in TSC22D3-2 (4-fold at 1 h,

Fig 3 Response of TSC22D transcripts to hyperosmotic stress and aldosterone in mIMCD3 cells Cells were exposed to hyperosmolality by increasing medium osmolality from 300 to 550 mOsm by addition of NaCl (filled circles), to 1 l M aldosterone (triangles), or to both hyper-osmolality and aldosterone simultaneously (open circles) Each panel shows the time course response for a particular transcript determined

by quantitative PCR Results are depicted as means ± SEM for three independent experiments Asterisks indicate significantly differences with respect to the value at time zero (P < 0.05).

Trang 5

33-fold at 12 h, 10-fold at 24 h) and TSC22D3-1

(five-fold at 4–6 h hours) (Fig 3) Of interest, a

combina-tion of hyperosmotic stress and aldosterone does

not potentiate the transient increase in TSC22D3-2

(Fig 3) By contrast, hyperosmotic stress and

aldoster-one in combination prevent transient short-term effects

and offset each other Taken together, the data on

osmotic regulation of TSC22D transcripts implicate

TSC22D2 as the closest functional homolog of tilapia

OSTF1

Identification of alternative TSC22D2 transcripts

Because of its similar osmotic regulation compared

with tilapia OSTF1 we investigated mouse TSC22D2

in more depth Two additional alternative transcripts

encoding splice variants of TSC22D2 protein were

identified that differed from the original cDNA

ENSMUST00000029383 (TSC22D2-1; Fig 1, Table 1)

These two additional cDNAs (GENSCAN000000732

55¼ TSC22D2-2 and ENSMUSESTG00000010047 ¼

TSC22D2-3) were predicted using the Ensembl

data-base and gene prediction software genscan and

genomewise⁄ genewise genscan is a bioinformatic

tool that predicts gene loci and their exon⁄ intron

composition based on the genomic DNA sequence

[17] genomewise⁄ genewise gene-prediction software

assembles cDNA sequences based on the analysis and

integration of EST data [18] Taking advantage of

information provided by these two complementary

approaches we thoroughly examined the TSC22D2

gene for alternative splicing events Alignment of the

three identified TSC22D2 splice variants against the

genomic TSC22D2 sequence revealed differences in

exon composition Two splice variants (TSC22D2-1⁄ 2)

consist of three exons, whereas the third splice variant

(TSC22D2-3) has four exons as a result of inclusion of

an extra 72 bp exon in the second position (Fig 4A)

The length of the first and last exons is also variable in

the three splice variants of TSC22D2 (Fig 4A)

We then tested for expression of the newly predicted

TSC22D2 transcripts (TSC22D2-2⁄ 3) in mouse kidney

cells Specific PCR primer pairs were designed to

amplify TSC22D2-2 (primer pair E–F), TSC22D2-3

(primer pair A–C), and all splice variants (primer pairs

A–B and A–D) We had already used primer pair A–B

for previous quantification of overall TSC22D2

tran-script abundance as it amplifies all possible splice

vari-ants (Fig 4A, Table S1) Expression of TSC22D2-2

and TSC22D2-3 was confirmed based on the presence

of RT-PCR products having the expected sizes

(Fig 4B, lanes A–C and E–F, respectively) In

addi-tion, using the primer pair A–D we detected three

different PCR products of 493, 406 and 334 bp instead

of the two products that we expected based on the pri-mer design shown in Fig 4A (amplicon ± exon 2) Therefore, the three PCR products obtained with primers A–D were purified, sequenced, and aligned to each other (Fig 4C) The sequence of two of these PCR products matched the predicted sequence for TSC22D2-1⁄ 2 and TSC22D2-3 (Fig 4C) These sequences differed by the presence of the 72-bp exon 2

in TSC22D2-3 as predicted

Surprisingly, however, an additional unpredicted fragment was discovered by PCR analysis

(TSC22D2-4, Fig 4) Sequencing of the corresponding PCR prod-uct confirmed that TSC22D2-4 represents an entirely novel splice variant that was not predicted by any of the bioinformatics methods used in our study nor reported to exist previously TSC22D2-4 included an alternative second exon of 159 bp but lacked the 72 bp exon 2 Schematic exon⁄ intron structures of all four TSC22D2 splice variants are compared in Fig 4D with emphasis on the two alternative exons 2A (72 bp) and 2B (159 bp), which are not present simultaneously in any TSC22D2 transcript in mIMCD3 cells (Fig 4B) Next, we analyzed the exon⁄ intron regions flanking TSC22D2 exons 2A and 2B All of these sequences match splice donor and acceptor consensus sites very well (5¢-AG ⁄ GT AG ⁄ G-3¢) (Table 2) In addition, the homologous intron⁄ exon regions that flank exons 2A and 2B in human TSC22D2 are 95% identical to mouse sequences indicating a high degree of conserva-tion of these critical areas compared with the overall much lower homology of TSC22D2 genomic sequence (< 50%; data not shown) Taken together, these observations strongly support alternative splicing events that give rise to TSC22D2 transcripts with dif-ferent exon 2 sequences

Protein products for TSC22D2-1 and TSC22D2-2 differ only by variable length of the first and last exons from each other (Fig 4A) In contrast, TSC22D2-3 and TSC22D2-4 differ more substantially from the other TSC22D2 variants because of the presence of an additional exon (exon 2A⁄ 2B) (Fig 4E) In particular, TSC22D2-4 differs greatly from the other variants because it lacks a large portion of the N-terminus due

to the presence of four in-frame stop codons in exon 2B (Fig 4C,E) An ATG codon following imme-diately after the last of these four stop codons may represent the transcription initiation site for a protein with a much shorter N-terminus (Fig 4E) Each of the four possible TSC22D2 protein products also differs with respect to the presence of consensus phosphoryla-tion sites for a number of stress-responsive protein kinases (Fig 4E)

Trang 6

Response of the four TSC22D2 variants to

hyperosmolality and aldosterone

We quantified abundances of individual TSC22D2

transcripts by quantitative PCR using the PCR primers

depicted in Fig 4A and Table 1 All four TSC22D2 variants are expressed at comparable levels in mouse kidney papilla, medulla, and cortex (data not shown)

To analyze the regulation of the four TSC22D2 vari-ants in response to hyperosmolality and aldosterone

C

D

E

A

B

Fig 4 Detection and characterization of alternative TSC22D2 transcripts (A) Align-ment of TSC22D2 (ENSMUST00000029383) with TSC22D2 transcripts predicted by

GENSCAN and GENOMEWISE ⁄ GENEWISE and genomic DNA (chromosome 3) Positions of PCR primers designed to differentiate between splice variants are indicated by arrows below the schematic representation

of genomic DNA (B) Products of PCR amplification using splice variant-specific TSC22D2 PCR primers (C) Nucleotide sequence of the PCR products amplified by the A–D primer pair In-frame stop and start codons are over-lined in gray and black, respectively (D) Schematic representation

of the exon–intron structure of all identified TSC22D2 transcripts Positions of PCR prim-ers designed to amplify individual splice vari-ants are indicated by arrowheads (E) Partial deduced amino acid sequence of the exon 2 region of all identified TSC22D2 transcripts The TSC22D domain is boxed Regions encoded by exon 2A and exon 2B are prin-ted in bold Splice variant-specific potential phosphorylation sites are underlined Aster-isk indicates the presence of an in-frame stop codon in the corresponding mRNA.

Trang 7

we exposed mIMCD3 cells to either of those stimuli

alone and to a combination of both All four

TSC22D2 variants are transiently upregulated by

hyperosmotic stress (Fig 5) The highest degree

of hyperosmotic upregulation was observed for

TSC22D2-4 Aldosterone with or without

hyperosmol-ality did not significantly affect the abundance of any

individual TSC22D2 variant, consistent with the results

obtained when all TSC22D2 variants were quantified together (Figs 3, 5)

Regulation of TSC22D2 variants by hyperosmolality

To identify the signal responsible for hyperosmotic upregulation of TSC22D2 we exposed mIMCD3 cells for 5 h to hyperosmotic media (550 mOsmolÆkg)1) pre-pared by addition of NaCl, choline chloride, sodium gluconate, mannitol, urea or glycerol TSC22D2-4 was always upregulated by hypertonic media (choline chlor-ide, sodium gluconate, mannitol, NaCl) independent of the presence of Na+ or Cl– in such media (Fig 6) In contrast, hyperosmolality due to nonhypertonic gly-cerol or urea did not alter TSC22D2-4 levels (Fig 6) Similar results were obtained for the other three TSC22D2 variants (data not shown) These data dem-onstrate that neither Na+nor Cl–nor hyperosmolality per se represent the signal for upregulation of

Table 2 Sequences corresponding to 3¢ acceptor and 5¢ donor

exon ⁄ intron boundaries in TSC22D2 transcripts.

5¢-Donor

EXON ⁄ intron

3¢-Acceptor intron⁄ EXON Exon 1 AGACAG ⁄ gtatgtaca gtctcacag ⁄ GAATCC Exon 2 A

Exon 1 AGACAG ⁄ gtatgtaca .ctttgctag ⁄ AATTTT Exon 2B

Exon 1 AGACAG ⁄ gtatgtaca .tttttccag⁄ TGCATC Exon 3

Exon 2 A GGATAG ⁄ gtatgatta .tttttccag ⁄ TGCATC Exon 3

Exon 2B AAATTG ⁄ gtaagactt .tttttccag ⁄ TGCATC Exon 3

Exon 3 GCAATG ⁄ gtaagtagg .tcttcacag ⁄ GATCTG Exon 4

Fig 5 Response of TSC22D2 alternative transcripts to hyperosmotic stress in mIMCD3 cells Cells were exposed to hyperosmolality by increasing medium osmolality from 300 to 550 mOsm by addition of NaCl (filled circles), to 1 l M aldosterone (triangles), or to both hyper-osmolality and aldosterone simultaneously (open circles) Each panel shows the time course response for a particular TSC22D2 alternative transcript as determined by quantitative PCR Results are depicted as means ± SEM for three independent experiments Asterisks indicate significantly differences with respect to the value at time zero (P < 0.05).

Trang 8

TSC22D2 Instead, hypertonicity is the stimulus that

triggers TSC22D2 upregulation

mRNA stabilization of TSC22D2 during

hyperosmotic stress

Next, we analyzed the mechanism of TSC22D2

upreg-ulation in response to hyperosmotic stress

Transcrip-tion in mIMCD3 cells was completely blocked by a

1 h preincubation in 10 lm actinomycin D Even 5 lm actinomycin was sufficient to effectively block tran-scription in mIMCD3 cells (Fig S2) Cells were then exposed to hyperosmotic stress, aldosterone, and control conditions (isosmotic medium) The half-life

of TSC22D2-4 was 2.8 ± 0.2 h for controls and aldosterone treatment but increased to > 20 h as a consequence of hyperosmolality (Fig 7) TSC22D2-1⁄ 2 and TSC22D2-3 responded similarly, with half-lives increasing from 2.8 ± 0.3 to > 10 h and 2.3 ± 0.3 to

> 15 h, respectively, in response to hyperosmolality (data not shown) These results indicate that mRNA stabilization is the mechanism responsible for hyper-osmotic upregulation of TSC22D2 transcripts

Osmoprotection of mIMCD3 cells by overexpression of TSC22D2-4

To evaluate whether TSC22D2 upregulation protects cells from hyperosmotic stress we generated stably transfected mIMCD3 cells that overexpress

TSC22D2-4 We first generated a mIMCD3 cell line with a Flp recombinase target site stably integrated into the genome (mIMCD3FRT cells; Fig S1) to generate a good control for future experiments with stably selec-ted cells We then cotransfecselec-ted V5-epitope-tagged TSC22D2-4 in pcDNA5FRT vector together with a Flp recombinase expression vector to insert

TSC22D2-4 into the FRT site in exchange for the LacZ gene The transgenic TSC22D2-4 cell line expressed  100-fold higher levels of TSC22D2-4 compared with mIMCD3FRT control cells (Fig 8A) A single protein with the expected molecular mass (17 kDa) was detec-ted in TSC22D2-4 cells using V5 antibody (Fig 8B) The transgenic TSC22D2-4 cells showed signifi-cantly greater hyperosmotic stress tolerance than mIMCD3FRT control cells We incubated these two cell lines for 24 h under hyperosmotic stress conditions that lead to a high frequency of apoptosis in wild-type mIMC3 cells (600–650 mOsmÆkg)1) [19] Under these conditions, TSC22D2-4 cells had a significantly improved phenotype (Fig 9A) and cell numbers were significantly higher compared with mIMCD3FRT con-trol cells (Fig 9B), indicating that high levels of TSC22D2-4 protect cells during hyperosmotic stress

Discussion

Mammals have four loci encoding at least nine TSC22D transcripts

We have identified four loci in the mouse genome that encode nine homalogs of the tilapia osmotic stress

Fig 6 Response of TSC22D2-4 to different hyperosmotic media in

mIMCD3 cells Osmolarity was increased from 300 to 550 mOsm

with the addition of the indicated compounds After 5 h, cells were

collected and TSC22D2-4 mRNA levels were determined by

quanti-tative PCR Results represent means ± SEM for three independent

experiments Asterisks indicate significant differences with respect

to isosmotic controls (P < 0.05).

Fig 7 Stability of TSC22D2-4 transcript mIMCD3 cells were

prein-cubated for 1 h with 10 lgÆmL)1actinomycin D in isosmotic

med-ium (300 mOsmolÆkg)1) Treatments were initiated at time zero

when cells were exposed to hyperosmolality by increasing medium

osmolality to 550 mOsmÆkg)1by addition of NaCl (black circles), to

1 l M aldosterone (black triangles), or isosmotic control conditions

(open circles) mRNA levels were determined by quantitative

real-time PCR and normalized to L32 mRNA Results are depicted as

means ± SEM for three independent experiments Asterisks

indi-cate significantly different values with respect to the value at time

zero (P < 0.05).

Trang 9

transcription factor OSTF1 All four genes belong to

the TSC22D family of leucine zipper proteins that

form homo- and heterodimers with other family

mem-bers Four TSC22D isoforms have previously been

des-cribed: TSC22D1-2 (TSC-22), TSC22D3-2 (GILZ),

TSC22D3-1 and TSC22D4

TSC22D1-2 was first isolated based on rapid and

transient transcriptional induction by TGF-b1 [13] It

also increases in response to anticancer drugs,

prog-esterone, and growth inhibitors [20] and has been

implied in mechanisms of tumorigensis

TSC22D3-2 was identified as a protein that is

induced following the treatment of thymocytes with

dexamethasone [14] Its mRNA increases threefold as

early as 30 min and by more than 10-fold within 4 h

of aldosterone exposure in principal cells of the renal

cortical collecting duct [21] In contrast, it is

downreg-ulated by estrogen in MCF-7 human breast cancer

cells [22] GILZ interacts with NF-jB and Raf and

inhibits AP-1, FoxO3, and Raf-mediated apoptotic

pathways [23–25] This protein mediates aldosterone

actions by stimulation of epithelial sodium

trans-port in kidney [26]

TSC22D3-1 was identified in porcine brain as a

77 kDa protein that shares immunoreactivity with the sequence-unrelated nonamer neuropeptide DSIP [27]

It was later found to be the most highly glucocorti-coid-induced cDNA among over 9000 tested in a cDNA gene chip array in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells [28]

TSC22D4 was identified in humans as a protein cap-able of forming heterodimers with TSC-22 [20] Its mouse homolog is involved in pituitary organogenesis [29]

In this study we identified five additional TSC22D transcripts that are encoded by genes located on chro-mosomes 3 (TSC22D2-1, TSC22D2-2, TSC22D2-3, TSC22D2-4) and 14 (TSC22D1-1) Although some of these novel transcripts have been previously described

in the context of high-throughput cDNA sequencing projects [30,31] their functions are unknown However, based on their sequence similarity to known TSC22D proteins they may be transcription factors that are involved in the regulation of cell proliferation, apop-tosis, and stress response pathways

A

B

Fig 9 TSC22D2-4 confers increased tolerance to hyperosmotic stress in mIMCD3 cells (A) Representative images of transfected and control (FRT) cells after exposure to 600 and 650 mOsm for

24 h (B) Count of viable transfected and control (FRT) cells after exposure to isoosmotic (300 mOsm) or hyperosmotic (600 mOsm) media for 72 h Asterisks indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) Results represent means ± SEM for three independent experiments.

A

B

Fig 8 Overexpression of TSC22D2-4 in mIMCD3 cells (A)

Deter-mination of expression levels of endogenous and transfected

TSC22D2-4 by quantitative real-time PCR Abundance is expressed

relative to L32 content Error bars are too small to be visible on the

logarithmic scale that is depicted Asterisks indicate significant

dif-ferences (P < 0.05) Results represent means ± SEM for three

independent experiments (B) Identification of transfected

TSC22D2-4 ⁄ V5-His-tagged fusion protein expression by western

blot using V5 antibody.

Trang 10

All nine TSC22D transcripts are expressed in

mouse kidney cells

Expression of all nine TSC22D transcripts was

con-firmed in mouse kidney and in the mIMCD3 cell line

The levels of expression of all nine TSC22D transcripts

in mIMCD3 cells in vitro were comparable with renal

tissue in vivo suggesting that mIMCD3 cells are a useful

model for studying mechanisms of regulation and

func-tions of TSC22D isoforms in mammalian kidney cells

The lack of previous evidence for expression of

sev-eral TSC22D transcripts identified in this study

sug-gests that they may be particularly important for

specific biological functions that are prevalent in renal

cells The multitude of alternatively spliced TSC22D2

gene products could be important for generating

func-tional variability in response to different environmental

cues However, in the case of hyperosmolality all four

splice variants of TSC22D2 are significantly

upregulat-ed even though the magnitude and kinetics of this

up-regulation was somewhat splice variant specific (see

Discussion below) and the structures of the respective

protein products are also different Variable exon 2

usage produces proteins with different N-termini

adja-cent to the conserved TSC22D motif This region is

responsible for transactivation suggesting that TSC22D

variants with truncated N-termini (in particular the

novel TSC22D2-4 variant) may be transcriptional

repressors that sequester other TSC22D family

members [20]

TSC22D2 and TSC22D4 are regulated by

hyperosmolality in kidney cells

In mIMCD3 cells exposed to hyperosmolality

TSC22D2 and TSC22D4 transcripts increase

signifi-cantly but with different kinetics The increase in

TSC22D2 transcripts is transient and closely resembles

that observed previously for tilapia OSTF1 [12] Thus,

despite the higher degree of structural homology of

tilapia OSTF1 with murine TSC22D3-1, the novel

murine TSC22D2 transcripts represent the closest

functional homologs of tilapia OSTF1 The magnitude

and kinetics of hyperosmotic upregulation of TSC22D2

splice variants shows some differences TSC22D2-1 and

TSC22D2-4 responded earlier and more robustly than

TSC22D2-2 and TSC22D2-3

Splice variants of other genes that respond

differen-tially to osmotic stress have been reported before, e.g

for cyclooxygenase 1 in human intestinal epithelial

cells [32] In addition such regulation has been

observed for other types of stress For instance,

Dro-sophila heat shock transcription factor is regulated by

alternative splicing in response to heat⁄ cold stress [33] The splicing factor hSlu7 was reported to alter its sub-cellular distribution and thus modulate alternative spli-cing after UV stress [34] In fact, alternative splispli-cing of pre-mRNA encoding transcription factors represents a common mechanism for generating the complexity and diversity of gene regulation patterns [35–38] This mechanism produces a variety of functionally distinct isoforms from a single gene by use of different combi-nations of splice junctions For example, alternative splicing within the DNA-binding domain of Pax-6 alters DNA-binding specificity of the resulting proteins [39] Alternative splicing of the transactivation domains in Pax-8 [40], the POU homeodomain family protein Pit-1 [41] and the zinc finger transcription fac-tor GATA-5 [42] also results in protein isoforms with different transactivation properties Deletion by spli-cing of the transactivation domain in AML1a [43] and CREB [44] produces proteins with dominant negative activity This may also be the case for TSC22D2 splice variants with a truncated transactivation domain, in particular TSC22D2-4 Thus, alternative splicing of TSC22D2 may confer increased complexity of gene regulation in response to hyperosmotic stress Our data indicate that TSC22D2-4 represents a survival factor for renal cells exposed to hyperosmolality suggesting that it promotes osmotic adaptation programs, poss-ibly by acting as a transcriptional repressor of pro-apoptotic genes

The time course of hyperosmotic induction of the murine TSC22D4 transcript is slower than TSC22D2, more stable, and more closely resembles that observed previously for TonEBP [45], although more transient hyperosmotic activation of TonEBP similar

to that of TSC22D2 has also been reported recently [46] Moreover, significantly higher levels of TSC22D4

in renal papilla vs cortex raise the possibility that this gene is stably upregulated by hyperosmolality not only in vitro but also in vivo Of interest, AP1 (jun, fos) and NF-jB are transcription factors that are regulated by osmotic stress [47–52] and, intriguingly, they are known to interact with TSC22D3-2 (GILZ) [23–25]

TSC22D3 is regulated by aldosterone

in kidney cells Aldosterone is the major corticosteroid hormone regu-lating electrolyte and fluid homeostasis in all verte-brates [53,54] The major action of the hormone on renal Na+transport is localized to the collecting duct Our results show that both TSC22D3 transcripts increase transiently in response to aldosterone

Ngày đăng: 30/03/2014, 10:20

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm