1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Báo cáo khoa học: It’s cheap to be colorful Anthozoans show a slow turnover of GFP-like proteins potx

10 487 0
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 10
Dung lượng 625,48 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

GFP-like proteins contribute a surprisingly high fraction to the overall soluble protein content of FP-expressing tissues in anthozoans, ranging from 4.5% in the coral Montastrea caverno

Trang 1

Anthozoans show a slow turnover of GFP-like proteins

Alexandra Leutenegger1,*, Cecilia D’Angelo1,*, Mikhail V Matz2, Andrea Denzel1, Franz Oswald3, Anya Salih4, G Ulrich Nienhaus5,6and Jo¨rg Wiedenmann1

1 Institute of General Zoology and Endocrinology, University of Ulm, Germany

2 Integrative Biology, University of Texas in Austin, TX, USA

3 Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Ulm, Germany

4 Electronic Microscopy Unit, University of Sydney, Australia

5 Institute of Biophysics, University of Ulm, Germany

6 Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA

The vivid blue, green, pink, orange or red hues of

anthozoans are mainly due to fluorescent proteins

(FPs) and nonfluorescent chromoproteins (CPs) [1–14]

These pigments are homologs of green fluorescent

protein (GFP), which acts as secondary emitter in the

bioluminescence reaction in Aequorea victoria [15] For

GFP-like proteins in nonbioluminescent anthozoans, a

photoprotective function has been suggested [2,16–19];

the underlying mechanism, however, remains

con-troversial [20,21] Whereas some FPs have spectral

properties that appear to be inappropriate for

photo-protecting tissue by modulating the intracellular light

climate [20], other FPs are spectrally well suited to

fluorescence energy transfer and dissipation of light energy via radiative and nonradiative pathways [19,21–23] Alternatively, an antioxidant function has recently been suggested [24] The distinct tissue-specific expression of FPs, the occurrence in anthozoans from habitats without light stress, and the separate evolutionary histories of differently colored FPs and CPs tend to support multiple specific functions for these proteins [3,5,12,19,25–27]

GFP-like proteins contribute a surprisingly high fraction to the overall soluble protein content of FP-expressing tissues in anthozoans, ranging from 4.5% in the coral Montastrea cavernosa to over 7% in

Keywords

coral pigments; green fluorescent protein;

photoconversion; protein half-life; protein

metabolism

Correspondence

J Wiedenmann, Institute of General

Zoology and Endocrinology, University of

Ulm, Albert Einstein-Allee 11, 89069 Ulm,

Germany

Fax: +49 731 502 2581

Tel: +49 731 502 2591 ⁄ 2584

E-mail: joerg.wiedenmann@uni-ulm.de

*These authors contributed equally to this

work

(Received 17 February 2007, revised 10

March 2007, accepted 12 March 2007)

doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05785.x

Pigments homologous to the green fluorescent protein (GFP) contribute up

to 14% of the soluble protein content of many anthozoans Maintenance

of such high tissue levels poses a severe energetic penalty to the animals if protein turnover is fast To address this as yet unexplored issue, we estab-lished that the irreversible green-to-red conversion of the GFP-like pig-ments from the reef corals Montastrea cavernosa (mcavRFP) and Lobophyllia hemprichii (EosFP) is driven by violet–blue radiation in vivo and in situ In the absence of photoconverting light, we subsequently tracked degradation of the red-converted forms of the two proteins in coral tissue using in vivo spectroscopy and immunochemical detection of the post-translational peptide backbone modification The pigments displayed surprisingly slow decay rates, characterized by half-lives of 20 days The slow turnover of GFP-like proteins implies that the associated energetic costs for being colorful are comparatively low Moreover, high in vivo stability makes GFP-like proteins suitable for functions requiring high pigment concentrations, such as photoprotection

Abbreviations

chl., chlorophyll; CP, chromoprotein; FP, fluorescent protein; GFP, green fluorescent protein.

Trang 2

Lobophyllia hemprichii and up to 14% in Acropora

nobilis (Wiedenmann, unpublished data) [27] These

results suggest that the animals face considerable

energy costs maintaining such high expression levels,

at least, if protein turnover is fast To date, no kinetic

data are available on the degradation of GFP-like

pro-teins in anthozoans In vitro, GFP and its homologs

are known to be extraordinarily resistant to heat,

detergents, chaotropes, reducing agents, extremes of

pH and protease activity [3,15] This stability results

from the rigid b-can fold conserved among different

members of this protein family, which comprises

11 antiparallel b-sheets surrounding a central helix

[6,28–36] The chromophore resides near the geometric

center of the molecule and is stabilized by the

sur-rounding protein scaffold In contrast to GFP, which

forms dimers only at concentrations > 1 mgÆmL)1

[15,37], its anthozoan homologs are most often seen to

form tightly packed tetramers, which might further

sta-bilize the molecular structures Degradation of

recom-binant GFP in cultured mouse cells follows first-order

kinetics with a half-life of  26 h [38] In dividing

human embryonic kidney cells, we found that the red

fluorescence of the anthozoan EosFP was detectable

for more than 9 days, whereas in Xenopus laevis

embryos the protein could be tracked for more than

14 days [6,39,40]

EosFP from L hemprichii and Kaede from

Trachy-phyllia geoffroyiibelong to the green-to-red

photocon-vertible FPs [41,42] They exhibit similar green

fluorescence emission spectra, peaking at 516 and

518 nm, respectively, and following irradiation with

 400 nm light, the proteins can be irreversibly

switched to emit red fluorescence, with peak emissions

at 581 and 582 nm, respectively Light-driven

photo-conversion involves cleavage of the polypeptide chain

into two fragments of  20 and  8 kDa [6,29,40,42]

Therefore, the amount of both fragments is indicative

of the amount of the red form Cleavage occurs on a

submillisecond time scale, as shown for single EosFP

molecules [6] Analysis of the crystal structure of

EosFP showed that the b-can fold and the tetrameric

protein assembly remain unperturbed by internal

frag-mentation [29] Proteins belonging to the green-to-red

photoconverting GFP-like proteins have also been

found as major colorants in the scleractinian corals

M cavernosa, Scolymia cubensis, Catalaphyllia jardinei,

the corallimorpharian Ricordia florida and the

alcyo-narian Dendronepthya sp [10,12,27] An unusual,

green-to-orange variant was recently described from an

orange color morph of L hemprichii [27]

Photoconversion offers a strategy to precisely and

noninvasively monitor protein degradation in the cell

Cells expressing one of these photoactivatable proteins are irradiated with activating light at a specific time, and subsequently, the red form can be monitored inde-pendently of the cellular pool of newly synthesized, green fluorescent pigment Consequently, degradation

of the photoconverted molecules can be followed via the decay in red fluorescence Obviously, light expo-sure has to be such that photoconversion is avoided and photobleaching is minimized In this study, we used this approach to measure the half-lives of green-to-red photoconvertible proteins in corals in order to obtain insights into GFP-like protein turnover in anthozoans To this end, we first had to verify that green-to-red conversion of mcavRFP and EosFP occurs only via photoinduction and not in any other way in the tissues of the corals they originate from,

M cavernosaand L hemprichii

Results and Discussion

Photoconversion in vivo and in situ

To measure protein degradation in red-converted forms

of mcavRFP and EosFP by monitoring the decay in red fluorescence in the tissues of red morphs of M caver-nosa and L hemprichii, we first had to ensure that green-to-red conversion is solely light-driven in the ani-mals and cannot be mediated by any other mechanism

To this end, colonies of both species were exposed

to a photon flux of 100 lmolÆm)2Æs)1 or kept in the dark for 30 days In light-exposed M cavernosa colon-ies, the green fluorescence of the contracted tentacles shines through the overlaid red-fluorescent tissue, resulting in a yellowish fluorescence of the polyp cen-ters, whereas the polyps and the coenosarc show a bright red fluorescence (Fig 1A) In contrast, the coe-nosarc of colonies kept in the dark fluoresce only in green (Fig 1A) This difference in the fluorescence images correlates with the different shapes of the emis-sion spectra In light-exposed animals, the red fluores-cence at 582 nm is more than three times as intense as the green emission at 516 nm (Fig 1C) In contrast, colonies incubated in the dark display a slightly higher green than red fluorescence (Fig 1C)

A similar color change was observable for L hem-prichii Animals exposed to light showed red fluores-cence after excitation with blue light (Fig 1B) In dark-treated corals, the red fluorescence intensity at

581 nm was reduced compared with the green fluores-cence at 516 nm and, consequently, the fluoresfluores-cence of the animals appears yellowish (Fig 1B,D)

Tissue extracts of M cavernosa and L hemprichii from light and dark treatments were subjected to

Trang 3

A B

E

G

F

J

M

Trang 4

immunoblot analysis using a polyclonal antiserum

raised against mcavRFP⁄ EosFP [27] In light-exposed

M cavernosa, a strong band corresponding to the

 20 kDa fragment of the photoconverted, red form is

clearly visible The nonconverted, green fluorescent

form appears only as a comparatively weak band

cor-responding to a molecular mass of 25 kDa (Fig 1E)

Conversely, the  25 kDa band is more pronounced

than the 20 kDa fragment for specimens kept in the

dark, suggesting that reduction of the red-converted

form is accompanied by an accumulation of the

non-converted green form of mcavRFP This observation is

in good agreement with the color change seen in the

animals (Fig 1A) Similarily, in L hemprichii, the

reduction in red tissue fluorescence is correlated with a

decrease in the intensity of the  20 kDa fragment

(Fig 1F) However, no accumulation of nonconverted

protein was observed for this species

Following dark treatment, a colony of M cavernosa

was exposed to 400 nm light Within 3 h, the

fluores-cence of the coenosarc and polyps changed from green

to red (Fig 1G–I) and, accordingly, the fluorescence

spectra show a relative increase in the 582 nm peak

compared with the 516 nm maximum (Fig 1J) The

majority of eggs and, subsequently, embryos of

M cavernosa show predominantly green fluorescence

peaking at 516 nm when kept in the dark following

their release from the mother colony (Fig 1K)

Irradi-ation with violet–blue light on the fluorescence

micro-scope induces photoconversion and gives rise to red

fluorescence with a maximal emission at 582 nm

(Fig 1K–M) It is interesting to note that the ratio of

green-to-red fluorescence in M cavernosa eggs is a

faithful indicator of the exposure of the mother colony

to violet light around 400 nm

In L hemprichii, no photoconversion was noticed in

the dark-treated animals upon irradiation with violet

light, which is in good agreement with the lack of a

visible accumulation of the nonconverted green form

of EosFP However, a small amount of green-to-red photoconversion was seen when irradiating macerated samples of ectodermal tissue with 366 nm light on the fluorescence microscope (data not shown)

To examine whether light intensity affects the level

of FP photoconversion in M cavernosa tissues, we compared animals kept in either weak or strong light for 4 weeks Whereas the tissue content of zooxanthel-lae pigments from the different light climates shows considerable changes [27], the photograph of the red fluorescence of colonies in Fig 2A reveals that the red tissue fluorescence remains identical Both

(Fig 2B), and the overall emission from both peaks and thus the pigment content of strong- and weak-light treated animals are also identical (Fig 2C) In accord with these results, immunoblot analysis revealed identical amounts of mcavRFP, as judged by the intensity of the diagnostic  20 kDa fragment (Fig 2D) From the identical results obtained with animals exposed to weak and strong light, we con-clude that the pool of green-to-red photoconverting proteins in M cavernosa is completely converted at a photon flux of 100 lmolÆm)2Æs)1 Therefore, emission

at 516 nm may arise from the presence of another

FP, the so-called long-wave GFP described previously for M cavernosa [12,27] We note that, under our experimental conditions, light intensity does not regu-late FP expression levels This is in good agreement with our finding that mcavRFP mRNA can be detec-ted in tissue even after 4 weeks of dark treatment (data not shown) Also, the tissue content of GFP in

M cavernosa and M faveolata is not significantly altered in a depth-dependent light gradient [20] Taken together, our results provide clear evidence that green-to-red conversion of mcavRFP and EosFP is a light-driven process in vivo and in situ

Fig 1 Effect of prolonged darkness on the presence of GFP-like proteins in M cavernosa and L hemprichii (A–F) Fluorescence images of (A) M cavernosa and (B) L hemprichii after 30 days with and without light Fluorescence was excited with blue light and photographed through a yellow long-pass filter Average fluorescence spectra of the coenosarcs of (C) M cavernosa and (D) L hemprichii after light and dark treatment Spectra were normalized to 1 at the maximum of the green form at 516 nm Error bars indicate standard deviations calcula-ted from six independent measurements Immunoblot analyses of tissue extracts isolacalcula-ted from (E) M cavernosa and (F) L hemprichii after light and dark treatment For each treatment, four replicate samples are shown Dark-treated animals show a reduced content of the

 20 kDa fragment indicative of the red form of green-to-red converting proteins Only M cavernosa shows an increase in the intensity of the 25 kDa band in the dark Photoconversion of mcavRFP in situ (G–M) A colony of M cavernosa was kept in the dark for 30 days and then continuously irradiated with  400 nm light Fluorescence images were taken (G) at the start of the experiment, after (H) 1 and (I)

3 hours Fluorescence emission spectra of the coenosarc were measured at the same time intervals (J) Six independent spectra were aver-aged and normalized to 1 at 516 nm Error bars indicate the standard deviations (K) Fluorescence micrograph of M cavernosa embryos The two yellowish embryos were previously photoconverted on the fluorescence microscope and mixed with unconverted embryos The yel-low color derives from an increased amount of red fluorescence, as is apparent from (L), where the image was taken in the red channel of the fluorescence microscope (M) Fluorescence spectra of the embryos recorded during photoconversion Over time, the red fluorescence

at 582 nm increases relative to the green fluorescence at 516 nm.

Trang 5

Kinetic analysis of protein degradation

To determine the half-lives of the red forms of

GFP-like proteins mcavRFP and EosFP in situ, colonies of

M cavernosa and L hemprichii were kept in the dark

for 30 days so as to prevent light-induced

photocon-version of newly synthesized green fluorescent proteins

During this time, red tissue fluorescence, and thus pro-tein content, was monitored spectrometrically We found that red-converted mcavRFP and EosFP decay very slowly, with half-lives of 20 ± 2 days (Fig 3A,B)

By contrast, control animals, which were exposed to light for the same time interval, displayed constant overall red fluorescence of the tissue

Prolonged darkness is stressful for the corals because the light-deprived symbiont reduces the transfer of photosynthetic products to the host Indeed, we observed a partial loss of zooxanthellae during this time (data not shown) To assess the influence of this stressful condition on the protein degradation kinetics,

we investigated the response of different colonies of

M cavernosa to different light colors (red, green and blue) at a constant photon flux of 200 lmolÆm)2Æs)1

A

B

D C

Fig 2 Independence of red tissue fluorescence emission from the

treatment with different light intensities For 4 weeks, different

col-onies of M cavernosa were exposed to weak (WL) or strong (SL)

light (A) Red tissue fluorescence of representative colonies kept

under weak and strong light photographed through a Schott filter

glass (550 nm long-pass) Fluorescence was excited by irradiation

with 530 nm light (B) Emission spectra of the tissue fluorescence

after weak and strong light treatment with excitation at 460 nm.

The graphs show averages of 12 independent measurements, error

bars indicate standard deviations (C) Comparison of the

fluores-cence intensity of the coral tissue recorded at the green (516 nm)

and red (582 nm) emission peaks (D) Mean optical density for the

 20 kDa band corresponding to the red-emitting form of mcavRFP

as deduced from immunoblotting analysis The immunoblot is

shown as an inset The error bars show the standard deviations of

four independent tissue extracts from colonies incubated under

weak and strong light, respectively.

Fig 3 Kinetics of red fluorescence emission determined in situ on (A) M cavernosa (mcavRFP) and (B) L hemprichii (EosFP) The dia-grams show the decay in tissue fluorescence at 582 nm (mcavRFP) and 581 nm (EosFP) over 25 days The diagrams show the medians

of 12 measurements per time point; error bars display the first and third quartiles Data from dark-treated animals were fitted to expo-nential decays No significant changes in fluorescence intensity were detected for light-treated animals By contrast, significant dif-ferences (P < 0.01) between animals from dark and light treat-ments were determined at day 25.

Trang 6

for 5 weeks Blue light (kmax ¼ 450 nm) is effective for

both photosynthesis of zooxanthellae and

photocon-version of GFP-like proteins Green (kmax¼ 512 nm)

and red (kmax > 580 nm) light can be utilized for

pho-tosynthesis of zooxanthellae due to absorption by

either the carotenoid peridinin (green light) or

chloro-phyll (red light), but both colors are essentially ineffec-tive for photoconversion of mcavRFP

During the 5-week experiment, tissue fluorescence in corals exposed to different light colors was measured using a fiber-optic probe coupled to the fluorescence spectrometer At the end of the experiment, coral

A

B

Fig 4 Effects of blue, green and red light treatment on red fluorescence of mcavRFP determined on M cavernosa (A) Fluorescence ima-ges with blue light excitation, and photographed through a yellow long-pass filter (Nightsea) after 37 days (B) Emission spectra of the coe-nosarc (kex¼ 460 nm), measured for animals maintained under experimental light conditions for 37 days The graphs show the average spectra and standard deviations for 12 independent measurements (C) Immunoblot analysis of the red-emitting form of mcavRFP Average optical density and standard deviations were calculated for the  20 kDa band of the red form, taking measurements from four independent, zooxanthellae-free tissue extracts per light treatment at the end of the experiment The inset shows the corresponding immunoblot results (D) Time dependence of the red tissue fluorescence intensity, determined over 37 days at 582 nm for colonies treated with red, green or blue light Symbols represent the median values and error bars the first and third quartile for every time point, calculated from 12 independ-ent measuremindepend-ents per light treatmindepend-ent Fluorescence of colonies irradiated with blue light remained constant during the experimindepend-ent (P < 0.01) The data for colonies irradiated with red and green were fitted with single-exponential decay functions (red and green curves, respectively) At day 37, significant differences indicated by asterisks were determined compared with the initial fluorescence (P < 0.01) Also, the red fluorescence of animals treated with green light is significantly lower (P < 0.01) than that of animals exposed to red light.

Trang 7

fluorescence was photographed and tissue samples

were removed for immunoblot analysis Colonies

exposed to blue light revealed bright orange

fluores-cence (Fig 4A) In contrast, colonies illuminated with

red light fluoresced greenish-yellow, whereas red

fluor-escence was essentially absent in animals kept under

green light As expected, these differences are due to

varying mcavRFP content, as deduced from decreased

tissue fluorescence at 582 nm and the lower amounts

of the 20 kDa fragment which represents the

photo-converted protein in tissue extracts (Fig 4B,C) The

tissue content of chlorophyll a (chl a) from

zooxant-hellae was identical for blue- and green-light-treated

colonies ( 7.0 ng chl aÆlg)1 total protein), the amount

of algal pigment, however, was reduced under red light

( 3.0 ng chl aÆlg)1 total protein), indicating less

fav-orable light conditions Overall, red tissue fluorescence

remained unaltered during 5-week exposure to blue

light (Fig 4D)

In contrast, we observed mcavRFP degradation in

animals kept under green and red light The half-lives

of mcavRFP for the respective light conditions were

calculated by fitting the tissue fluorescence emission

data collected at 582 nm to exponential decay

func-tions The variability in half-life values was estimated

from the maximal deviation of the individual time

points We obtained half-lives of mcavRFP of 13 ± 2

days in green light and 19 ± 2 days in red light The

latter is most similar to the value obtained for

dark-treated animals, indicating only a minor, if any, effect

of red light on mcavRFP degradation Upon exposure

to green light, however, the half-life was shortened

Green light excites the chromophores efficiently, and

thus, the observed shortened half-life may indicate that

photobleaching of the chromophores also destabilizes

the overall protein However, an influence by other

pigments completely disconnected from the FPs may

also play a role Indeed, it is well known that light of

shorter wavelengths induces photodamage in living

cells [44,45] Nevertheless, the GFP-like proteins

proved to be extraordinarily stable in the coral tissue

even under damaging light conditions Therefore,

the stability of the tetrameric proteins observed in vitro

is indicative of stability in vivo and in situ This

stability is very beneficial for maintaining high

concen-trations of protein with minimal metabolic effort,

which is a requirement for functional roles such as

photoprotection

Conclusions

Green-to-red conversion of GFP-like proteins is a

photoinduced process driven by violet–blue light in

scleractinian corals Red pigments are retained in the tissues for many days, with half-lives of up to

 20 days The slow turnover of GFP-like proteins in anthozoans implies that the energetic cost of maintain-ing a high pigment concentration in the tissue is com-paratively low The exceptionally high stability of GFP-like proteins in vivo and in situ makes them well suited to fulfill functions that require a high protein concentration, for example, protection from potentially damaging light intensities

Experimental procedures

Collection and maintenance of coral colonies Specimens of M cavernosa were collected in Key West, Florida under Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary permit number 2003-053-A1 and adapted to aquarium con-ditions at the Whitney Laboratory (St Augustine, FL)

L hemprichii was purchased via the German aquarium trade Colonies for experimentation were kept in artificial seawater at 25 ± 1C under a 12 h light ⁄ dark cycle in the Sea Water Facility of the Department of General Zoology and Endocrinology at the University of Ulm Experiments involving varying light environments were always per-formed within one tank, exposing all animals under study

to identical water conditions

Spectroscopy and photoconversion of coral pigments in situ

Coral colonies growing in a photon flux of 100 lmolÆ

m)2Æs)1 were split into two groups, one of which (the con-trol group) remained illuminated, while the other was kept

in complete darkness After 4 weeks, fluorescence of the colonies was excited by using a hand-held blue light lamp (Nightsea, Andover, MA) or a metal halide lamp (Osram, Danvers, MA) equipped with a 530 nm bandpass filter glass (Schott, Mainz, Germany), and photographs were taken with a Camedia C-730 Ultra Zoom Digital Compact Camera (Olympus, Hamburg, Germany) through a yellow long-pass filter (Nightsea) or a 550 nm long-pass glass filter (Schott) Fluorescence spectra were measured in the coenosarc regions of the polyps by using a Varian Cary Eclipse fluorometer (Varian, Palo Alto, CA), equipped with

a fiber-optic probe A constant spacing between the head of the optical fiber and the tissue was ensured by means of a

4 mm spacer tip

After the spectroscopic measurements, tissue samples were collected for immunoblot analysis Photoconversion in live corals was induced by irradiation with a blacklight blue fluorescent light source Sylvania 18 W (Osram) for 3 h at a photon flux of < 30 lmolÆm)2Æs)1 During the course of irradiation, the change in fluorescence was documented

Trang 8

photographically and spectrometrically Alternatively, tissue

samples were frozen to kill the cells Subsequently, they

were thawed on an object slide and photoconverted on the

fluorescence microscope as described [6] Also, embryos of

M cavernosa were photoconverted on a fluorescent

micro-scope (MZ FL III, Leica Microsystems Inc., Wetzlar,

Ger-many) by using a blue filter, while spectra of the embryos

were collected using a USB2000 spectrometer (Ocean

Optics, Dunedin, FL) equipped with a fiber optic probe

that was coupled to the eyepiece of the microscope To

assess the influence of the light intensity on

photoconver-sion, different colonies of M cavernosa growing under

weak light conditions (photon flux 100 lmolÆm)2Æs)1) were

divided into two groups, one of which continued with weak

light exposure, while the other group was gradually adapted

to a photon flux of 400 lmolÆm)2Æs)1 (strong light) After

4 weeks’ exposure to strong light, tissue fluorescence was

measured and protein extracts were prepared for

immuno-blot analysis

Protein extraction, immunoblot analysis and

determination of chlorophyll content

Preparation of tissue extracts and immunoblot analysis was

performed as described previously [27] Protein

concentra-tion was determined by the BCATM protein assay (Pierce,

Rockford, IL) Zooxanthellae pigments were extracted and

quantified as outlined previously [27]

Determination of FP half-lives

To measure the kinetics of degradation of the red-fluorescent

proteins, colonies of M cavernosa and L hemprichii were

either kept under weak light or transferred to total darkness

Changes in the intensity of red tissue fluorescence were

deter-mined spectrometrically, as describe above, at intervals of

3–5 days For M cavernosa, a total of 18 replicate colonies

derived from three different mother colonies was studied In

the case of L hemprichii, we examined six replicate colonies

For each time-point, 12–24 independent measurements were

taken and averaged from different colonies

In parallel, colonies of M cavernosa were exposed for a

total of 5 weeks to blue, green and red light, each with a

photon flux of 200 lmolÆm)2Æs)1 The different colors were

produced by filtering light from metal halide lamps with

lighting filters (Lee Filters, Andover, UK) The filters

allowed maximal light transmission at  450 ± 40

(FWHM) nm (band pass, ‘Zenith Blue’),  512 ± 40

(FWHM) nm (band pass, ‘Dark Green’) and > 580 nm

(long pass, Primary Red) During the experimental period,

24 fluorescence spectra were collected from the tissues of

the colonies at five different time points At the end of the

experiment, tissue extracts were prepared and subjected to

immunoblot analysis

Statistical analysis The software analyse it for Microsoft Excel, Version 1.73 (Microsoft, Redmond, CA), was used for statistical analy-ses P-values of < 0.01 obtained from t-test (two dependent groups) and Mann–Whitney U-test (two independent groups) were considered statistically significant

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungs-gemeinschaft (SFB 497⁄ B9 to FO, SFB 497 ⁄ D2 to GUN, and Wi1990⁄ 2-1 to JW), Landesforschungsschwerpunkt

ARC⁄ NHMRC Network FABLS Australia (collaborat-ive grant to AS et al.), and IDP Education Australia (Australia–Europe Scholarship to AL) The authors acknowledge technical help of Florian Schmitt (Univer-sity of Ulm) during the dark treatment experiment

References

1 Wiedenmann J (1997) Die Anwendung eines orange flu-oreszierenden Proteins und weiterer farbiger Proteine und der zugeho¨renden Gene aus der Artengruppe Anemonia sp (sulcata) Pennant, (Cnidaria, Anthozoa, Actinaria) in Gentechnologie und Molekularbiologie Offenlegungsschrift DE 197(18), 640 [Deutsches Patent– und Markenamt, 1–18.]

2 Wiedenmann J, Ro¨cker C & Funke W (1999) The morphs of Anemonia aff sulcata (Cnidaria, Anthozoa)

in particular consideration of the ectodermal pigments

In Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft fu¨r O¨kologie (Pfaden-hauer J, ed.), pp 497–503 Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany

3 Wiedenmann J, Elke C, Spindler K-D & Funke W (2000) Cracks in the b-can: fluorescent proteins from Anemonia sulcata Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97, 14091–14096

4 Wiedenmann J, Schenk A, Ro¨cker C, Girod A, Spindler K-D & Nienhaus GU (2002) A far-red fluorescent pro-tein with fast maturation and reduced oligomerization tendency from Entacmaea quadricolor (Anthozoa, Actinaria) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 11646–11651

5 Wiedenmann J, Ivanchenko S, Oswald F & Nienhaus

GU (2004) Identification of GFP-like proteins in non-bio-luminescent, azooxanthellate Anthozoa opens new per-spectives for bioprospecting Mar Biotechnol 6, 270–277

6 Wiedenmann J, Ivanchenko S, Oswald F, Schmitt F, Ro¨cker C, Salih A, Spindler K-D & Nienhaus GU (2004) EosFP, a fluorescent marker protein with UV-inducible green-to-red fluorescence conversion Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 15905–15910

Trang 9

7 Matz MV, Fradkov AF, Labas YA, Savitsky AP,

Zaraisky AG, Markelov ML & Lukyanov SA (1999)

Fluorescent proteins from nonbioluminescent Anthozoa

species Nat Biotechnol 17, 969–973

8 Fradkov AF, Verkhusha VV, Staroverov DB, Bulina

ME, Yanushevich YG, Martynov VI, Lukyanov S &

Lukyanov KA (2002) Far-red fluorescent tag for protein

labelling Biochem J 368, 17–21

9 Miyawaki A (2002) Green fluorescent protein-like

pro-teins in reef Anthozoa animals Cell Struct Funct 27,

343–347

10 Labas YA, Gurskaya NG, Yanushevich YG, Fradkov

AF, Lukyanov KA, Lukyanov SA & Matz MV (2002)

Diversity and evolution of the green fluorescent protein

family Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 4256–4261

11 Dove SG, Hoegh-Guldberg O & Ranganathan S (2001)

Major colour patterns of reef-building are due to a

family of GFP-like protein Coral Reefs 19, 197–204

12 Kelmanson IV & Matz MV (2003) Molecular basis and

evolutionary origins of color diversity in great star coral

Montastraea cavernosa(Scleractinia: Faviida) Mol Biol

Evol 20, 1125–1133

13 Shagin DA, Barsova EV, Yanushevich YG, Fradkov

AF, Lukyanov KA, Labas YA, Semenova TN, Ugalde

JA, Meyers A, Nunez JM et al (2004) GFP-like

pro-teins as ubiquitous metazoan superfamily: evolution of

functional features and structural complexity Mol Biol

Evol 5, 841–850

14 Lukyanov KA, Fradkov AF, Gurskaya NG, Matz MV,

Labas YA, Savitsky AP, Markelov ML, Zaraisky XZ,

Fang Y, Tan W et al (2000) Natural animal coloration

can be determined by a nonfluorescent green fluorescent

protein homolog J Biol Chem 275, 25879–25882

15 Ward WW (1998) Biochemical and physical properties

of green fluorescent protein In Green Fluorescent

Pro-tein: Properties, Applications, and Protocols(Chalfie M

& Kain S, eds), pp 45–75 Wiley-Liss, New York, NY

16 Kawaguti S (1944) On the physiology of reef corals VI

Study on the pigments Palao Trop Biol Stn Stud 2,

617–674

17 Kawaguti S (1969) Effect of the green fluorescent

pig-ment on the productivity of reef corals Micronesia 5,

313

18 Salih A, Hoegh-Guldberg O & Cox G (1998)

Photopro-tection of symbiotic dinoflagellates by fluorescent

pig-ments in reef corals In Proceedings of the Australian

Coral Reef Society(Greenwood JG & Hall NJ, eds),

pp 217–230 University of Queensland, Brisbane

19 Salih A, Larkum A, Cox G, Ku¨hl M &

Hoegh-Guldberg O (2000) Fluorescent pigments in corals are

photoprotective Nature 408, 850–853

20 Mazel CH, Lesser MP, Gorbunov MY, Barry TM,

Farrell JH, Wyman KD & Falkowski PG (2003)

Green-fluorescent proteins in Caribbean corals Limnol

Ocea-nogr 48, 402–411

21 Gilmore AM, Larkum AWD, Salih A, Itoh S, Shibata

Y, Bena C, Yamasaki H, Papina M & van Woesik R (2003) Simultaneous time resolution of the emission spectra of fluorescent proteins and zooxanthellar chloro-phyll in reef-building corals Photochem Photobiol 77, 515–523

22 Salih A, Larkum A, Cronin T, Wiedenmann J, Szymczak R & Cox G (2004) Biological properties of coral GFP-type proteins provide clues for engineering novel optical probes and biosensors SPIE: Genetically Engineered Probes for Biomedical Applications 5329, 61–72

23 Cox G & Salih A (2006) Fluorescent characteristics of fluorochromatophores in corals In Focus on Multidi-mensional Microscopy(Cheng PC, Hwang PP, Wu JL, Wang G & Kim H, eds), Vol 3 World Scientific, Hackensack, NJ

24 Bou-Abdallah F, Chasteen ND & Lesser MP (2006) Quenching of superoxide radicals by green fluorescent protein Biochim Biophys Acta 1760, 1690–1695

25 Salih A, Wiedenmann J, Matz M, Larkum AW & Cox

G (2006) Photoinduced activation of GFP-like proteins

in tissues of reef corals SPIE: Genetically Engineered Probes for Biomedical Applications 6098, 64–75

26 Matz MV, Marshall NJ & Vorobyev M (2006) Are corals colorful? Photochem Photobiol 82, 345–350

27 Oswald F, Schmitt F, Leutenegger A, Ivanchenko S, D’Angelo C, Salih A, Maslakova S, Bulina M, Schirmbeck R, Nienhaus GU et al (2007) Contributions

of host and symbiont pigments to the coloration of reef corals FEBS J 274, 1102–1122

28 Yang F, Moss LG & Phillips GN Jr (1996) The molecu-lar structure of green fluorescent protein Nat Biotechnol

14, 1246–1251

29 Tsien RY (1998) The green fluorescent protein Annu Rev Biochem 67, 509–544

30 Nienhaus K, Nienhaus GU, Wiedenmann J & Nar H (2005) Structural basis for photo-induced protein clea-vage and green-to-red conversion of fluorescent protein EosFP Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 9156–9159

31 Nienhaus K, Renzi F, Vallone B, Wiedenmann J & Nienhaus GU (2006) Exploring chromophore–protein interactions in fluorescent protein cmFP512 from Cerianthus membranaceus– X-ray structure analysis and optical spectroscopy Biochemistry 45, 12942–12953

32 Nienhaus K, Renzi F, Vallone B, Wiedenmann J & Nienhaus GU (2006) Chromophore–protein interactions

in the Anthozoan green fluorescent protein asFP499 Biophys J 91, 4210–4220

33 Prescott M, Ling M, Beddoe T, Oakley AJ, Dove S, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Devenish RJ & Rossjohn J (2003) The 2.2 A˚ crystal structure of a pocilloporin pigment reveals a nonplanar chromophore conformation Struc-ture (Camb) 11, 275–284

Trang 10

34 Remington SJ, Wachter RM, Yarbrough DK,

Branchaud B, Anderson DC, Kallio K & Lukyanov KA

(2005) zFP538, a yellow-fluorescent protein from

Zoanthus, contains a novel three-ring chromophore

Bio-chemistry 44, 202–212

35 Yarbrough D, Wachter RM, Kallio K, Matz MV &

Remington SJ (2001) Refined crystal structure of

DsRed, a red fluorescent protein from coral, at 2.0 A˚

resolution Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 462–467

36 Petersen J, Wilmann PG, Beddoe T, Oakley AJ,

Devenish RJ, Prescott M & Rossjohn J (2003) The 2.0

A˚ crystal structure of eqFP611, a far red fluorescent

protein from the sea anemone Entacmaea quadricolor

J Biol Chem 278, 44626–44631

37 Zacharias DA, Baird GS & Tsien RY (2000) Recent

advances in technology for measuring and manipulating

cell signals Curr Opin Neurobiol 10, 416–421

38 Corish P & Tyler-Smith C (1999) Attenuation of green

fluorescent protein half-life in mammalian cells Protein

Eng 12, 1035–1040

39 Wacker S, Oswald F, Wiedenmann J & Kno¨chel W

(2006) A green to red photoconvertible protein as

ana-lyzing tool for early vertebrate development Dev Dyn,

236, 473–480

40 Nienhaus GU, Nienhaus K, Ho¨lzle A, Ivanchenko S, Renzi F, Oswald F, Wolff M, Schmitt F, Ro¨cker C, Vallone B et al (2006) Photoconvertible fluorescent pro-tein EosFP: biophysical properties and cell biology applications Photochem Photobiol 82, 351–358

41 Ando R, Hama H, Yamamoto-Hino M, Mizuno H & Miyawaki A (2002) An optical marker based on the UV-induced green-to-red photoconversion of a fluores-cent protein Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 12651–12656

42 Wiedenmann J & Nienhaus GU (2006) Live-cell ima-ging with EosFP and other photoactivatable marker proteins of the GFP family Expert Rev Proteomics 3, 361–374

43 Mizuno H, Mal TK, Tong KI, Ando R, Furuta T, Ikura M & Miyawaki A (2003) Photo-induced peptide cleavage in the green-to-red conversion of a fluorescence protein Mol Cell 12, 1051–1058

44 Young RW (1988) Solar radiation and age-related macular degeneration Surv Ophthalmol 32, 252–269

45 Gorgidze LA, Oshemkova SA & Vorobjev IA (1998) Blue light inhibits mitosis in tissue culture cells Biosci Rep 18, 215–224

Ngày đăng: 30/03/2014, 09:20

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm