Abbreviations AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; Cdk, cyclin-dependent kinase; CK2, casein kinase 2; CSB, Cockayne syndrome group B protein; DNMT, DNA methyltransferase; ERK, extracellu
Trang 1Wisely chosen paths – regulation of rRNA synthesis
Delivered on 30 June 2010 at the 35th FEBS Congress in
Gothenburg, Sweden
Ingrid Grummt
Division of Molecular Biology of the Cell II, German Cancer Research Center, DKFZ-ZMBH-Alliance, Heidelberg, Germany
Introduction
Growing cells require continuous ribosome synthesis
to ensure that subsequent generations are provided
with the ribosomes necessary to support protein
syn-thesis The more rapidly cells proliferate, the more
rap-idly ribosomes must be synthesized The synthesis of
rRNA, the first event in ribosome synthesis, is a
fun-damental determinant of a cell’s capacity to grow and
proliferate rRNA genes (rDNAs) are transcribed with
high efficiency, and rRNA synthesis is regulated in a
sophisticated way to be responsive to both general
metabolism and specific environmental challenges [1–3] Indeed, almost any perturbation that slows cell growth or protein synthesis, such as nutrient and growth factor starvation, senescence, toxic lesion or viral infection, leads to a decrease in rDNA transcrip-tion Conversely, rDNA transcription is upregulated upon reversal of such conditions and by agents that stimulate growth The number of rRNA genes varies greatly among organisms, covering a vast range from fewer than 100 to more than 10 000 Each rRNA gene
Keywords
chromatin; epigenetics; noncoding RNA;
rRNA genes; signaling; transcription
Correspondence
I Grummt, Molecular Biology of the Cell II,
DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, German Cancer
Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld
581, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Fax: +49 6221 423404
Tel: +49 6221 423412
E-mail: i.grummt@dkfz.de
(Received 19 July 2010, revised 16 September
2010, accepted 22 September 2010)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07892.x
All cells, from prokaryotes to vertebrates, synthesize enormous amounts of rRNA to produce 1–2 million ribosomes per cell cycle, which are required
to maintain the protein synthesis capacity of the daughter cells In recent years, considerable progress has been made in the elucidation of the basic principles of transcriptional regulation and the pathways that adapt cellular rRNA synthesis to metabolic activity, a process that is essential for under-standing the link between nucleolar activity, cell growth, proliferation, and apoptosis I will survey our present knowledge of the highly coordinated networks that regulate transcription by RNA polymerase I, coordinating rRNA gene transcription and ribosome production with environmental cues Moreover, I will discuss the epigenetic mechanisms that control the chromatin structure and transcriptional activity of rRNA genes, in particu-lar the role of noncoding RNA in DNA methylation and transcriptional silencing
Abbreviations
AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; Cdk, cyclin-dependent kinase; CK2, casein kinase 2; CSB, Cockayne syndrome group B protein; DNMT, DNA methyltransferase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase; GSK, glycogen synthase kinase; HMG, high-mobility group; H3K4me3, histone H3 trimethylated at Lys4; H3K9, histone H3 Lys9; H3K9me1, histone H3 methylated at Lys9; H3K9me2,
histone H3 dimethylated at Lys9; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; NoRC, nucleolar remodeling complex; NPM, nucleophosmin; nsRNA, noncoding RNA; rDNA, gene encoding rRNA; PCAF, p300/ CBP-associated factor; PFH8, PHD finger protein 8; PIC, preinitiation complex; pre-rRNA, ribosomal precursor RNA; Pol I, DNA-dependent RNA polymerase I; pRNA, promoter-associated RNA; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10; RSK, ribosomal S6 kinase, 90 kDa; S6K, ribosomal S6 kinase, 60 kDa; TAF I , Pol I-specific TBP-associated factor; TBP, TATA-binding protein; TFIIH,
transcription factor IIH; TTF-I, transcription termination factor I; UBF, upstream binding factor; UCE, upstream control element.
Trang 2encodes a long precursor RNA (45S pre-rRNA) that is
processed and post-transcriptionally modified to
gener-ate one molecule each of 18S, 5.8S and 28S rRNA
Actually, almost all signaling pathways that affect cell
growth and proliferation directly regulate rRNA
synthesis, their downstream effectors converging at the
DNA-dependent RNA polymerase I (Pol I)
transcrip-tion machinery
Given the repetitive nature of rRNA genes, two
strategies for regulating rRNA synthesis are
conceiv-able Pol I transcription may be controlled either by
changing the rate of transcription from active genes or
by adjusting the number of genes that are involved in
transcription (Fig 1) There is evidence for both
options In most cases, short-term regulation is
brought about by reversible modification of Pol I
tran-scription factors that affect the efficiency of
transcrip-tion initiatranscrip-tion and⁄ or the rate of transcription from
active rRNA genes, whereas long-term regulation
dur-ing development and differentiation is achieved by
epi-genetic mechanisms that alter the ratio of active to
silent copies of rRNA genes, thereby regulating the
number of genes transcribed
This article discusses and summarizes work on the
mechanisms that mammalian cells use to regulate
rRNA synthesis, and hence ribosome production, in
response to external signals Although the emerging
picture of transcriptional regulation is one of
unex-pected variety and complexity, we are beginning to
understand the functions of individual components of
the Pol I transcription apparatus, the pathways that
link rDNA transcription to cell growth, and the role
of epigenetic mechanisms that establish the active and
inactive states of rRNA genes As both transcription
of rDNA and maturation of rRNA play central roles
in the complex network that controls cell growth and proliferation, the elucidation of the molecular path-ways that transmit information on the growth state of
a cell population to the Pol I transcription apparatus represents a challenging and rewarding subject of research
The Pol I transcription machinery Ribosome biogenesis is a major cellular process that occurs in distinct nuclear compartments, the nucleoli Nucleoli form around the multiple tandem arrayed copies of rRNA genes, known as nucleolus organizer regions, which are located at one or several acrocentric chromosomes Nucleoli disappear if rRNA synthesis is curtailed, indicating that the nucleolar structure is dependent on rDNA transcription Actually, nucleolar morphology is diagnostic for the general metabolism
of the cell, and morphological changes in the number and size of nucleoli constitute a reliable marker of the proliferative state of cancer cells Mammalian rDNA clusters are characterized by multiple alternating mod-ules of a long intergenic spacer of approximately 30 kb and a pre-rRNA coding region of approximately
14 kb Each active rRNA gene is transcribed by Pol I
to generate 45S pre-rRNA After synthesis, pre-rRNA
is processed and modified to generate one molecule each of mature 18S, 5.8S and 28S rRNA, which, together with 5S rRNA, which is transcribed by DNA-dependent RNA polymerase III, form the RNA back-bone of the ribosome
Altered ratio of Altered rate of
active versus silent genes transcription initiation
Active copies
Silent copies
Fig 1 Two methods of rDNA transcription regulation Cells regulate rRNA synthesis by modulating the rate of transcription initiation, thereby controlling the number of nascent pre-rRNA molecules (green lines) that are generated from active genes (left panel) Alternatively,
as there are hundreds of rRNA genes, subsets of rDNA repeats are turned either ‘on’ or ‘off’ as required The gray ellipses indicate the more compact, heterochromatic conformation of silent rRNA genes; the red boxes represent transcription terminator elements located upstream and downstream of the rDNA transcription units.
Trang 3Transcription initiation is a complex process that
requires the assembly of a specific multiprotein
com-plex at the rDNA promoter, containing Pol I and a
surprising number of associated proteins that promote
Pol I transcription (Fig 2) In mammals, the assembly
of the preinitiation complex (PIC) is mediated by the
synergistic action of two basal Pol I-specific
transcrip-tion factors that bind to the rDNA promoter, i.e the
upstream binding factor (UBF) and the promoter
selectivity factor, termed SL1 in humans and TIF-IB
in mice [4,5] UBF is a member of the high-mobility
group (HMG) protein family, which contains five
HMG boxes The multiple HMG boxes enable UBF
to loop approximately 140 bp of DNA into a single
turn, thereby inducing a nucleosome-like structure [6]
UBF activates rRNA gene transcription by recruiting
Pol I to the rDNA promoter [7] and through
displace-ment of nonspecific DNA-binding proteins, such as
histone H1, from rDNA [8] Depletion of UBF leads
to stable and reversible repression of rDNA
transcrip-tion by promoting histone H1-induced assembly of
compact, transcriptionally inactive chromatin [9]
Addi-tionally, UBF regulates promoter escape of Pol I [10] and transcription elongation [11] UBF expression is reduced in differentiated cells, indicating that UBF levels regulate rDNA transcription during growth and differ-entiation [9]
UBF acts synergistically with SL1, a complex contain-ing the TATA-bindcontain-ing protein (TBP) and four Pol I-specific TBP-associated factors (TAFIs), which nucleates transcription complex assembly and confers promoter selectivity on Pol I [12,13] The TAFI subunits mediate specific interactions between the rDNA promoter and Pol I, thus playing an important role in recruiting Pol I – together with a collection of Pol I-associated factors – to the rDNA promoter In addition, the asso-ciation of Pol I with the preinitiation complex involves interactions with UBF and PAF53 (53 kDa Pol I-asso-ciated factor) [14], and with a Pol I-assoI-asso-ciated factor, termed PAF49 PAF49 is a homolog of the yeast Pol I subunit A34.5, previously identified as a subunit of the T-cell receptor complex (CAST) [15]
Pol I exists in two distinct forms, Pol Ia and Pol Ib, the latter being capable of assembling into productive
18S RNA
Topo I SIRT7 CK2
AcƟn
Pol I
NM1 28S RNA
UBF
TIF-IA
T0
Fig 2 Cartoon depicting the structural organization of mammalian rDNA repeats and the basal factors required for transcription initiation The sites of transcription initiation of 47S pre-rRNA (black arrow) and transcripts from the spacer promoter (red arrow) are indicated Binding sites for the transcription termination factors located downstream of the transcription unit (T 1–10 ) and upstream of the gene promoter (T o ) are indicated by red boxes Repetitive enhancer elements located between the spacer promoter and major gene promoter are indicated by blue boxes The factors that are associated with the rDNA promoter and Pol I, respectively, are depicted by ellipsoids Synergistic binding of UBF and SL1 to the rDNA promoter is required for the recruitment of Pol I and multiple Pol I-associated factors to the transcription start site
to initiate pre-rRNA synthesis An electron microscopic image visualizing active amphibian rRNA genes is shown above It reveals the tan-dem head-to-tail arrangement of rRNA genes that are separated by ‘nontranscribed spacers’ and the characteristic Christmas tree appear-ance of active transcription units (from Miller and Beatty [75]).
Trang 4transcription initiation complexes [16] Pol Ib is
associ-ated with numerous proteins, including the basal
tran-scription factors, protein kinase CK2, nuclear actin,
nuclear myosin 1 (NM1), chromatin modifiers, such as
G9a and SIRT7, and proteins involved in replication
and DNA repair, such as topoisomerases I and IIa,
Ku70⁄ 80, proliferating cell nuclear antigen,
transcrip-tion factor IIH (TFIIH) and CSB [17] These findings
are compatible with a mechanism in which a Pol I
‘holoenzyme’ is recruited to the rDNA promoter to
coordinate rRNA synthesis and maturation as well as
chromatin modification and DNA repair However,
the concept of the Pol I transcription machinery as a
massive multiprotein complex that assembles in a
sto-chastic manner from freely diffusible subunits has been
eclipsed by measurements of the movement of
fluores-cently tagged subunits of Pol I and basal transcription
factors These studies revealed that the Pol I
transcrip-tion machinery is highly dynamic, assembling in a
sto-chastic fashion, sometimes individually and sometimes
in subcomplexes [18] Quantitative single-cell imaging
combined with computational modeling and
biochemi-cal analysis revealed that upregulation of transcription
is accompanied by prolonged retention of Pol I factors
at the rDNA promoter [19], demonstrating that
modulation of the efficiency of transcription initiation
complex assembly is a decisive step in the regulation of
rDNA transcription
Basal Pol I transcription factors are
targeted by multiple signaling pathways
Transcription of rRNA genes is efficiently regulated to
be responsive to both general metabolism and specific
environmental challenges Conditions that impair
cellu-lar metabolism, such as nutrient starvation, oxidative
stress, inhibition of protein synthesis and cell
conflu-ence, will downregulate rDNA transcription, whereas
growth factors and agents that stimulate growth and
proliferation will upregulate Pol I transcription
(Fig 3) There is evidence that almost all proteins
required for Pol I transcription can serve as targets for
regulatory pathways For example, Cdk
(cyclin-depen-dent kinase)1–cyclin B-depen(cyclin-depen-dent phosphorylation of
TAFI110, a subunit of SL1 that nucleates PIC
assem-bly, causes shutdown of rDNA transcription during
mitosis Mitotic phosphorylation of TAFI110 at
Thr852 impairs the ability of SL1 to interact with
UBF, thereby abrogating transcription complex
forma-tion [20,21] Thus, reversible phosphorylaforma-tion of SL1 is
used as a molecular switch to shut down rDNA
scription during mitosis Resetting of the Pol I
tran-scription machinery at the end of mitosis is brought
about by Cdc14B, a phosphatase that is sequestered within the nucleolus during interphase and activated upon release from rDNA at prometaphase [22] hCdc14B dephosphorylates Thr852 at the exit from mitosis [23], thereby allowing transcription complex assembly and resumption of rRNA synthesis in early
G1-phase (Fig 4)
In early G1-phase, rDNA transcription remains low, although the activity of SL1 has been fully recovered
To achieve optimal transcriptional activity, UBF has
to be phosphorylated at Ser484 by Cdk4–cyclin D1 and at Ser388 by Cdk2–cyclin E⁄ A [23,24] Mutations that prevent phosphorylation of Ser388 impair the interaction of UBF with Pol I and abrogate rDNA transcription The finding that specific Cdk–cyclin complexes modulate the activity of SL1 and UBF in a cell cycle-dependent manner links the control of cell cycle progression with regulation of Pol I transcrip-tion In quiescent cells, UBF is hypophosphorylated [25,26], and phosphorylation of the two N-terminal HMG boxes of UBF by extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK) is essential for activation of rDNA transcription by growth factors [27] Moreover, the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a key regulator of cell growth and proliferation, stimulates Pol I transcription in part through phosphorylation of the C-terminal activation domain of UBF [28], under-scoring the importance of UBF phosphorylation in the control of rRNA synthesis In addition to transcription initiation, phosphorylation of UBF plays an important role in transcription elongation UBF is bound along the pre-rRNA coding region through which Pol I must pass [29] UBF phosphorylated by ERK permits Pol I elongation, whereas hypophosphorylated UBF inhibits elongation, demonstrating that transcription elongation
Growth factors
Starvation
Viral infection Metabolic stress
Fig 3 Extracellular signals impinge on transcription of rRNA genes The cartoon illustrates the signaling pathways that upregu-late (green arrows) or downreguupregu-late (red arrows) nucleolar tran-scription, converging at Pol I transcription.
Trang 5is a major rate-limiting step for growth
factor-depen-dent regulation of rDNA transcription [11]
Acetylation is another post-translational
modifica-tion that regulates the activity of UBF and SL1
Acet-ylation of TAFI68 by the the histone acetyltransferase
PCAF augments SL1 activity and stimulates
transcrip-tion initiatranscrip-tion [30,31] PCAF-dependent acetylatranscrip-tion of
TAFI68 is counteracted by SIRT1, the founding
mem-ber of a family of highly conserved NAD+-dependent
histone deacetylases, termed sirtuins SIRT1 is
con-served from bacteria to humans, and regulates a wide
range of biological processes, such as gene silencing,
aging, differentiation, and cell metabolism [32] SIRT1
deacetylates TAFI68, leading to impaired binding of
SL1 to the rDNA promoter and inhibition of
transcrip-tion initiatranscrip-tion In contrast, SIRT7, another member of
the sirtuin family, exerts a positive effect on Pol I
tran-scription SIRT7 localizes to nucleoli, is associated with
active rDNA repeats, interacts with Pol I, and
stimu-lates rDNA transcription by enhancing Pol I
occu-pancy at rDNA [33] Knockdown of SIRT7 leads to
cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, underscoring the
piv-otal role of SIRT7 in cell survival As the activity of
sirtuins depends on the level of cellular NAD+,
changes in the cellular energy status are translated into
changes in rRNA synthesis and ribosome production
Thus, sirtuins are central players in the regulation of
rDNA transcription, SIRT1 repressing and SIRT7 activating rRNA genes, thereby linking Pol I transcrip-tion to the metabolic activity of the cell
In a recent study, Murayama et al uncovered an additional interrelationship between the cellular energy status and rDNA transcription [34] They identified a novel protein complex, termed energy-dependent nucle-olar silencing complex, which contains the NAD+ -dependent histone deacetylase SIRT1, the histone methyltransferase SUV39H1, and a nucleolar protein, termed nucleomethylin, which binds to histone H3 dimethylated at Lys9 (H3K9me2) If the intracellular energy supply is limited, the deacetylase activity of SIRT1 is enhanced, leading to elevated levels of his-tone H3 Lys9 (H3K9) methylation and an increased number of silent rDNA repeats These results suggest the existence of a mechanism that links cell physiology
to rDNA silencing, which in turn is a prerequisite for nucleolar integrity and cell survival
TIF-IA – a transcription factor that is targeted by multiple signaling
pathways Conditions that negatively affect cell growth, including stress, nutrient starvation, and toxic lesions, down-regulate transcription of rDNA, whereas agents that
Cdk2–cyclin E
Cdk2–cyclin A ERK
Cdk1–cyclin B
P P P
TIF-IA
UBF
P P
UBF
P P
UBF
P P
P
TIF-IA
P P
SL1
P
S
G1
G2 M
Fig 4 Regulation of Pol I transcription during the cell cycle During progression through the G1-phase and S-phase, UBF is activated by phosphorylation of Ser484 by Cdk4–cyclin D and Ser388 and Cdk2–cyclin E ⁄ A, respectively In addition, mTOR-dependent and ERK-depen-dent pathways activate TIF-IA by phosphorylation of Ser44, Ser633 and Ser649 At entry into mitosis, Cdk1–cyclin B phosphorylates TAF I 110,
a subunit of the TAFI–TBP complex SL1, at Thr852 Phosphorylation at Thr852 inactivates SL1, leading to repression of Pol I transcription during mitosis At the exit from mitosis, Cdc14B dephosphorylates Thr852, leading to recovery of SL1–TIF-IB activity Activating phosphoryla-tions are marked in green, and inhibiting ones in red Transcription is low in resting cells (G 0 ), and resumption of full transcriptional activity
on re-entry into the cell cycle requires phosphorylation of TIF-IA by ERK ⁄ RSK and phosphorylation of UBF by ERK, Cdk4–cyclin D and S6K See text for details.
Trang 6stimulate growth and proliferation upregulate rRNA
synthesis [35–38] A key player in growth-dependent
regulation of rDNA transcription is TIF-IA, the
mam-malian homolog of yeast RRN3 [39], an essential
tran-scription initiation factor that is associated with the
initiation-competent form of Pol I [40–42] TIF-IA
interacts with Pol I, and with two Pol I-specific TAFIs,
thereby connecting Pol I with the preinitiation complex
[16,43] The activity of TIF-IA is regulated by diverse
signals that affect cell growth and proliferation, thus
adapting Pol I transcription to different growth
condi-tions and environmental cues TIF-IA is
phosphory-lated at multiple sites by various signaling cascades,
and changes in the phosphorylation pattern of TIF-IA
correlate with upegulation or downregulation of rRNA
synthesis in response to external signals (Fig 5)
Specific phosphorylation of TIF-IA either facilitates or
impairs the interaction with Pol I and⁄ or SL1,
indicat-ing that reversible phosphorylation of TIF-IA is an
effective way to rapidly and efficiently modulate rDNA
transcription in response to growth factors, nutrient
availability, or external stress Conditions that support
growth and proliferation, such as nutrients and growth
factors, activate TIF-IA by mTOR-dependent and
ERK-dependent phosphorylation at Ser44, Ser633, and
Ser649 Conversely, stress-induced activation of c-Jun
N-terminal kinase (JNK)2 triggers phosphorylation of
TIF-IA at Thr200, and this phosphorylation impairs
the interaction of TIF-IA with both Pol I and SL1
Thus, JNK2-dependent, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-dependent and mTOR-dependent phosphorylation of TIF-IA affects the formation of productive transcription complexes and adapts rRNA synthesis to cell growth and proliferation Moreover, rDNA transcription and ribosome biogenesis are regu-lated by the intracellular ATP levels [44] The key enzyme that translates changes in energy levels into adaptive cellular responses is the AMP-activated pro-tein kinase (AMPK) If energy levels are low and the intracellular AMP⁄ ATP ratio is elevated, AMPK switches on energy-producing processes and switches off energy-consuming pathways to restore cellular ATP levels Activation of AMPK triggers phosphory-lation of TIF-IA at Ser635, which in turn inactivates TIF-IA and inhibits rRNA synthesis [38] This finding reveals another level of regulation of Pol I transcrip-tion, at which TIF-IA not only senses external signals but also translates changes in intracellular energy supply into upregulation or downregulation of rRNA synthesis
Oncogenes and tumor suppressors affect rRNA synthesis
Consistent with rDNA transcription being tightly linked to cell growth and proliferation, Pol I trans-cription is regulated by a balanced interplay between oncogene products and tumor suppressors (Fig 6) In healthy cells, Pol I transcription is restrained by tumor suppressors, such as pRb, p53, ARF and PTEN (phos-phatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromo-some 10 Such restraints are compromised during cell transformation and are accentuated by oncogene products, such as c-Myc and nucleophosmin (NPM), which stimulate Pol I transcription Several oncogene products have been demonstrated to directly regulate rRNA biogenesis, whereas others affect signaling path-ways that control Pol I transcription It is therefore plausible that cells might achieve a proliferative advan-tage by elevating the level of specific oncogene prod-ucts to increase the production of rRNA For example, the proto-oncogene product c-Myc was shown to localize in nucleoli at sites of rRNA synthe-sis, to interact with specific consensus elements at rRNA genes, to associate with SL1, and to activate rDNA transcription [45,46] c-Myc appears to promote cell growth, at least in part through facilitating recruit-ment of the Pol I machinery to rDNA, thereby enhancing production of components required for ribosome biogenesis Consistent with elevated levels of specific oncogene products increasing the production
of rRNA, the nucleolar endoribonuclease NPM (also
Cell cycle
44
Cdk2
635
649
RSK
JNK
200
633 Growth
factors
ERK2
172
CK2
170
AMPK
Nutrients
Stress
Energy deprivation
Fig 5 The transcription factor TIF-IA is targeted by multiple
signal-ing pathways Growth-dependent control of rDNA transcription is
exerted by TIF-IA, a basal transcription factor that mediates the
interaction of Pol I with the PIC TIF-IA is phosphorylated at
multi-ple sites by the indicated protein kinases (boxed) Specific
phos-phorylation enhances (green) or inhibits (red) the interaction with
Pol I and ⁄ or SL1 A two-dimensional tryptic phosphopeptide map of
in vivo labeled TIF-IA is shown The encircled numbers indicate the
positions of the phosphorylated serines or threonines contained in
the respective tryptic peptides.
Trang 7known as B23), was shown to increase the level of
TAFI48 and to stimulate proliferation of transformed
cells NPM shuttles between the nucleolus,
nucleo-plasm, and cytonucleo-plasm, and its overexpression or
muta-tion has been associated with a broad range of human
cancers [47] NPM is required for rRNA maturation,
and has been implicated in multiple cellular processes,
including genome stability, cell cycle progression,
response to genotoxic stress, DNA repair, maintenance
of chromatin structure, and regulation of the activity
and⁄ or stability of the tumor suppressors p53 and
ARF
The tumor suppressors pRb, p53 and ARF (p19ARF
in mouse and p14ARF in human) are central players in
pathways that arrest cell cycle progression and induce
cell death in response to DNA damage and oncogenic
stress These tumor suppressors restrain cell growth by
repressing Pol I transcription pRb, the product of the
retinoblastoma susceptibility (Rb) gene, accumulates in
nucleoli of differentiated or cell cycle-arrested cells
[48], and downregulates rRNA synthesis [49] In
healthy cells, pRb restrains Pol I transcription by
interacting with UBF, leading to dissociation of UBF
from rDNA and to impaired transcription complex
formation [50,51] The tumor suppressor p53, on the
other hand, represses Pol I transcription by association
with TBP and TAFI110, abrogating the formation of
PICs consisting of SL1 and UBF [52] Under normal
conditions, p53 is a short-lived protein present at a
barely detectable level On exposure to stress or after
inhibition of rDNA transcription, p53 levels increase,
triggering a cascade of events that finally lead to cell
cycle arrest or apoptosis Actually, any agent that inhibits ribosome biogenesis also disturbs the nucleolar structure, and this, in turn, is translated into enhanced p53 activity [53] In support of nucleolar transcription regulating p53, disruption of the TIF-IA gene by Cre-dependent homologous recombination leads to inhibi-tion of Pol I transcripinhibi-tion, perturbainhibi-tion of the nucleo-lar structure, and p53-dependent apoptosis [54] Upregulation of p53 in response to TIF-IA deficiency
is caused by inhibition of MDM2⁄ HDM2, a specific E3 ubiquitin ligase that controls p53 abundance by proteasome-mediated degradation of p53 in the cyto-plasm After TIF-IA depletion, the p53–MDM2 com-plex is disrupted and p53 levels are elevated The increase of p53 level in response to inhibition of rRNA synthesis is caused by release of ribosomal proteins, which bind to MDM2⁄ HDM2 and thereby inhibit its E3 ligase activity, resulting in p53 being stabilized [55] Thus, ongoing pre-rRNA synthesis is required for nucleolar retention of proteins that control p53 activ-ity, reinforcing the idea that the nucleolus is a major cellular stress sensor that integrates and transmits sig-nals for regulation of p53 activity (Fig 7)
A key upstream controller of p53 is the tumor sup-pressor ARF, which provides a first line of defense against hyperproliferative signals that are provoked by oncogenic stimuli ARF is sequestered in the nucleoli
of unstressed cells Nucleolar sequestration of ARF depends on continuous transcription, and release of ARF from the nucleolus is a plausible mechanism for transmission of the stress signal ARF activity is induced upon nucleolar stress, which increases p53
Tumor suppressors
Disrupts SL1 Prevents
TTF-I binding
Inhibits
UBF/SL1
interaction
Increases TAF I 48 expression Increases UBF
expression
Stabilizes SL1–UBF
Oncogenes
NPM Myc
PTEN p53
GSK3β pRb
ARF
TIF-IA SL1
UBF
Inhibits SL1–UBF interaction
Induces UBF degradation
Fig 6 Oncogene products and tumor sup-pressors control Pol I transcription Onco-gene products activate rRNA synthesis by upregulating the level of transcription factors and ⁄ or stabilizing protein–protein or protein– DNA interactions (marked by green arrows), whereas tumor suppressors inhibit rRNA synthesis by interfering with macromolecu-lar interactions required for transcription initiation complex assembly (marked by red lollypops).
Trang 8concentrations by binding to MDM2⁄ HDM2 and
inhibiting its ability to trigger p53 degradation ARF
has been reported to downregulate Pol I transcription
through interaction with UBF and inhibition of
pre-rRNA processing, possibly by lowering the level
and⁄ or activity of the endonuclease NPM, thereby
blocking a specific step in the maturation of rRNA
[56] Thus, ARF not only triggers a p53 response that
represses Pol I transcription, but also blocks the
pro-duction of mature rRNA by inhibiting the processing
of pre-rRNA Presumably, the primordial role of ARF
is to slow ribosome production in response to
hyper-proliferative stress provoked by oncogenic stimuli Its
subsequent linkage to p53 may have then evolved to
improve its efficiency and provide a more adequate
checkpoint for coupling ribosome production with
p53-dependent inhibitors of cell cycle progression
Moreover, a recent study demonstrated that ARF
inhibits the nucleolar import of transcription
termina-tion factor I (TTF-I), causing the accumulatermina-tion of
TTF-I in the nucleoplasm [57]
The tumor suppressor PTEN is a phosphatase that
regulates cell growth by its ability to regulate Pol I
transcription Overexpression of PTEN represses RNA
Pol I transcription, whereas decreased levels of PTEN
correlate with enhanced rRNA synthetic activity
PTEN-mediated repression requires its lipid
phospha-tase activity, and is independent of the p53 status of
the cell PTEN inhibits phosphoinositide 3-kinase
sig-naling and triggers disruption of the TBP–TAFI
com-plex SL1, thereby preventing the assembly of
transcription initiation complexes [52] In
Ras-trans-formed cells, PTEN was found at the rDNA promoter
in a complex with another potential tumor suppressor, glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)3b Inhibition of GSK3b upregulates rRNA synthesis, whereas a consti-tutively active GSK3b mutant inhibits rDNA tran-scription by interaction with SL1 Thus, the interplay between PTEN and GSK3b represents a powerful mechanism the cell uses to ensure that ribosome bio-genesis is coupled to growth control
Chromatin modifications and epigenetic control of rDNA transcription Transcription of rDNA is also modulated by epige-netic mechanisms Approximately half of the several hundred copies of rRNA genes exhibit a heterochro-matic chromatin structure and are transcriptionally silent (Fig 8) The fact that, even in proliferating cells with a high demand for ribosome biogenesis, a signifi-cant fraction of rRNA genes are epigenetically silent provides a unique possibility to decipher the mecha-nisms that establish a given epigenetic state of rDNA, and to study the functional impact of balancing the ratio of active and silent rDNA repeats on cell surveil-lance and genomic stability Specific epigenetic charac-teristics distinguish active rDNA repeats from inactive ones Generally, transcriptionally active genes are char-acterized by an ‘open’ euchromatic structure, whereas silent ones exhibit a more compact heterochromatic structure Specific histone modifications are associated with transcriptionally active and silent rDNA repeats, acetylation of histone H4 and methylation of
Intact nucleolus
Perturbed nucleolus
MDM2
p53
rP rP rP
p53
rP MDM2
rP rP
Fig 7 Ablation of TIF-IA leads to cell cycle
arrest and apoptosis In TIF-IA-containing
cells, the nucleolus is transcriptionally
active, and p53 is maintained at low levels
through ubiquitination by MDM2 and
degra-dation by proteasomes In TIF-IA-deficient
cells, the nucleolar structure is perturbed
and ribosomal proteins (rP) are released into
the nucleoplasm, where they associate with
MDM2 to inhibit its activity As a
conse-quence, the amount and activity of p53 are
enhanced, leading to cell cycle arrest and
apoptosis.
Trang 9tone H3 Lys 4 correlating with transcriptional activity,
whereas histone H4 hypoacetylation and methylation
of H3K9, histone H3 Lys27 and histone H4 Lys20
cor-relate with transcriptional silencing [58,59] Regarding
the functional relevance of heterochromatin formation
and rDNA silencing, hypomethylation of rRNA genes
decreases genomic stability, suggesting that silencing
entails the assembly of a generally repressive
chroma-tin domain that is less accessible to the cellular
recom-bination machinery
NoRC – a chromatin remodeling
complex that mediates transcriptional
silencing
Switching between the active and silent state of rRNA
genes is mediated by a chromatin remodeling
complex, termed NoRC, a member of ATP-dependent
chromatin remodeling machines comprising the
ATPase SNF2h and a large subunit, TIP5
(TTF-I-interacting protein 5 [60]) NoRC interacts with DNA
methyltransferase(s), histone deacetylase(s), and
his-tone methyltransferase(s), thereby recruiting the
enzymes required for heterochromatin formation and
rDNA silencing In the mouse, NoRC-dependent
transcriptional silencing involves methylation of a critical CpG residue in the upstream control element (UCE) of the rDNA promoter Methylation prevents binding of the Pol I-specific transcription factor UBF
to nucleolar chromatin, and impairs the formation of transcription initation complexes [61] Thus, targeting NoRC to rDNA leads to rewriting of the histone code, changes in DNA methylation, and, ultimately, hetero-chromatization and transcriptional silencing of rRNA genes [62,63] In addition, NoRC shifts the promoter-bound nucleosome downstream of the transcription start site into a translational position that is unfavorable for transcription complex formation [64] Thus, NoRC serves at least two functions: first, as a remodeling complex that alters the position of the nucleosome at the rDNA promoter; and second, as a scaffold coordi-nating the activities of macromolecular complexes that modify histones, methylate DNA, and establish a
‘closed’ heterochromatic state
A noncoding RNA is required for NoRC function
Evidence from several experimental systems demon-strates the profound and complex role that noncoding
Active copies
TIP5 UBF
Silent copies
NoRC
Chromatin remodeling Heterochromatin formation DNA methylation
CH 3 CH 3 CH 3
TIP5 SNF2h H4ac H3ac H3K4me2
H3K9me H4K20me HP1
Fig 8 NoRC triggers the establishment of the silent, heterochromatic state of rRNA genes Potentially active rRNA genes exhibit an ‘open’ chromatin structure, are associated with Pol I and nascent pre-rRNA (green lines), and are characterized by DNA hypomethylation, acetyla-tion of histone H4 (H4ac), and dimethylaacetyla-tion of histone H3 Lys4 (H3K4me2) Epigenetically silenced rRNA genes are demarcated by histone H4 hypoacetylation, methylation of H3K9 (H3K9me) and histone H4 Lys20 (H4K20me), association with heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) and CpG methylation (CH3) Methylation prevents UBF binding and impairs transcription complex formation The silent state of rRNA genes is mediated by the NoRC, a complex comprising SNF2h and TIP5, which interacts with pRNA and histone-modifying enzymes A de-convolution micrograph of interphase nuclei in U2OS cells, showing the nucleolar localization of TIP5 (red) and UBF (green) combined with 4¢,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole-stained chromatin, is shown at the right.
Trang 10RNAs play in regulating gene expression [65,66].
Noncoding RNAs are integral components of
chroma-tin, acting as key regulators of gene expression and
genome stability Although the mechanistic details of
how RNA and chromatin are connected remain
unclear, there is increasing evidence that epigenetic
reg-ulation probably represents an intimate and balanced
interplay of both RNA and chromatin fields [67,68] In
support of this notion, NoRC function requires
bind-ing of TIP5, the large subunit of NoRC, to 150–
250 nucleotide RNA, termed pRNA, because it is
com-plementary in sequence to the rDNA promoter [63]
pRNA originates from a Pol I promoter located within
the intergenic spacer 2 kb upstream of the 45S
pre-rRNA coding region (Fig 9) Intergenic transcripts are
of low abundance and usually do not accumulate
in vivo, because they are rapidly degraded, unless they
are shielded from degradation by binding to NoRC
Antisense-mediated depletion of pRNA leads to
dis-placement of NoRC from nucleoli, hypomethylation of
rDNA, and activation of Pol I transcription pRNA
folds into a stem–loop structure, and this specific
structure is conserved in several mammals Mutations
that prevent formation of the stem–loop structure
impair binding of pRNA to TIP5 and abolish
nucleo-lar targeting of NoRC [69]
Analysis of the silencing capacity of wild-type or
mutant forms of pRNA revealed that the specific
stem–loop structure of pRNA is indispensable for
NoRC function [69] Although pRNA sequences that
fold into the specific stem–loop structure are required
for NoRC binding and recruitment to rDNA, this part
of pRNA is not sufficient for NoRC-directed DNA
methylation and transcriptional silencing Current
results show that pRNA sequences upstream of the
stem–loop structure interact with T0, the
promoter-proximal binding site of the transcription factor
TTF-I Truncated pRNA derivatives lacking the T0 sequence fail to trigger de novo methylation and rDNA silencing Strikingly, the upstream part of pRNA that
is complementary to T0 is itself able to direct DNA methylation and transcriptional silencing We postulate that this region of pRNA may form a specific RNA– DNA structure, such as Watson–Crick base pairing or Hoogsteen or reversed Hoogsteen base pairing, that serves as an anchor module guiding DNA methyltrans-ferase (DNMT)3b to the promoter of specific rDNA repeats (Fig 10)
G U G
G A U
U U G
–126G –49
G
A U U U U
–1997
Spacer promoter pre rRNA promoter
T0
A C G
U U
G C A C
G C C U C U C
UCE CORE
U
U
A G G
C U U
G C G A U G
G C
(promoter-associated RNA)
150–250 nucleotides
‘pRNA’
C U U
G G
U
TIP5
SNF2h
Fig 9 Model depicting the origin of pRNA
that is associated with NoRC Intergenic
transcripts (dotted line) are synthesized
from a Pol I promoter located 2 kb
upstream of the pre-RNA promoter The
pri-mary intergenic transcripts are degraded by
the exosome, except for 150–250
nucleo-tide transcripts that match the rDNA
pro-moter (pRNA), which are stabilized by
binding to NoRC pRNA folds into a specific
stem–loop structure (shown at the right),
and this secondary structure is recognized
by TIP5 The association of pRNA with the
TAM domain of TIP5 is required for NoRC
binding to rDNA and NoRC-dependent
het-erochromatin formation.
HDAC
HMT
T 0
CH 3
TIP5
DNMT
Fig 10 Model illustrating the role of NoRC and pRNA in rDNA methylation and silencing NoRC is recuited to the rDNA promoter
by interaction with TTF-I bound to its target site T0 pRNA base pairs with T 0 , leading to displacement of TTF-I and recruitment of DNMT3b, which mediates methylation of the rDNA promoter Methylation of CpG-133 impairs transcription complex assembly Triplex formation allows the neighboring hairpin structure of pRNA
to bring NoRC close to the rDNA promoter and to consolidate rDNA repression by recruiting histone-modifying enzymes HDAC, histone deacetylase; HMT, histone methyltransferase.