1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Báo cáo Y học: Secretion of a peripheral membrane protein, MFG-E8, as a complex with membrane vesicles A possible role in membrane secretion pptx

10 523 0
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 10
Dung lượng 319,91 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Secretion of a peripheral membrane protein, MFG-E8,as a complex with membrane vesicles A possible role in membrane secretion Kenji Oshima1, Naohito Aoki1, Takeo Kato2, Ken Kitajima1and T

Trang 1

Secretion of a peripheral membrane protein, MFG-E8,

as a complex with membrane vesicles

A possible role in membrane secretion

Kenji Oshima1, Naohito Aoki1, Takeo Kato2, Ken Kitajima1and Tsukasa Matsuda1

1 Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan; 2 Food Research Institute, Aichi Prefectural Government, Nagoya, Japan

MFG-E8 (milk fat globule-EGF factor 8) is a peripheral

membrane glycoprotein, which is expressed abundantly in

lactating mammary glands and is secreted in association with

fat globules This protein consists of two-repeated EGF-like

domains, a mucin-like domain and two-repeated

discoidin-like domains (C-domains), and contains an integrin-binding

motif (RGD sequence) in the EGF-like domain To clarify

the role of each domain on the peripheral association with

the cell membrane, several domain-deletion mutants of

MFG-E8 were expressed in COS-7 cells The

immunofluo-rescent staining of intracellular and cell-surface proteins and

biochemical analyses of cell-surface-biotinylated and

secre-ted proteins demonstrasecre-ted that both of the two C-domains

were required for the membrane association During the

course of these studies for domain functions, MFG-E8, but

not C-domain deletion mutants, was shown to be secreted as

membrane vesicle complexes By size-exclusion

chromato-graphy and ultracentrifugation analyses, the complexes were

characterized to have a high-molecular mass, low density and higher sedimentation velocity and to be detergent-sensitive Not only such a exogenously expressed MFG-E8 but also that endogenously expressed in a mammary epi-thelial cell line, COMMA-1D, was secreted as the membrane vesicle-like complex Scanning electron microscopic analyses revealed that MFG-E8 was secreted into the culture medium

in association with small membrane vesicles with a size from

100 to 200 nm in diameter Furthermore, the expression of MFG-E8 increased the number of these membrane vesicle secreted into the culture medium These results suggest a possible role of MFG-E8 in the membrane vesicle secretion, such as budding or shedding of plasma membrane (micro-vesicles) and exocytosis of endocytic multivesicular bodies (exosomes)

Keywords: MFG-E8; membrane secretion; exosome; per-ipheral membrane protein; milk fat globule membrane

MFG-E8 (milk fat globule-EGF factor 8) was cloned and

characterized as mouse milk 53- and 66-kDa glycoproteins

peripherally associated with the membrane surrounding the

lipid droplets and being referred to as milk fat globule

membrane (MFGM) [1] MFG-E8 consists of two repeated

EGF-like domains on the N-terminal side and of two

repeated C (discoidin-like) domains homologous to the C1

and C2 domains of blood coagulation factors V and VIII

Orthologous proteins have been isolated in bovine

(MGP57/53 or PAS-6/7) [2,3], human (BA46 or

lacta-dherin) [4,5] and rat (rAGS) [6]

Though the expression of MFG-E8 is upregulated in

lactating mammary gland, MFG-E8 has also been detected

in various other tissues, including brain, lung, heart, kidney

and spleen in some mammals such as mouse, human and

bovine [7–9] The mouse and bovine MFG-E8 proteins expressed in mammary gland were shown to be composed

of two isoforms [3,9] In mouse, a Pro/Thr-rich domain is inserted possibly by a mammary gland-specific alternative splicing between EGF-like and C-domains, resulting in the production of a long form of MFG-E8 (MFG-E8-L) in the lactating mammary gland In contrast, a short form (MFG-E8-S) lacking the Pro/Thr-rich domain is ubiquitously expressed in various tissues [9]

The second EGF-like domain of MFG-E8 contains an integrin-binding Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) sequence motif [10], which is conserved in all known MFG-E8 sequences of several species and binds to some integrins The avb5 integrin was affinity-purified from lactating bovine udder extracts by using its specific binding to bovine milk MFG-E8 [7], and human and bovine MFG-E8 proteins promoted cell adhesion through avb3 and avb5 integrins [11, 12] Although MFG-E8 contains no apparent hydro-phobic transmembrane regions, MFG-E8 has been shown

to be a peripheral membrane protein and bind directly to the MFGM and cell membrane [7,13–15] Both the native and recombinant MFG-E8 proteins bind in vitro to anionic phospholipids, especially phosphatidylserine (PtdSer) [7,12,16] This PtdSer-binding of MFG-E8 has been reported to depend only on the second C-domain (C2-domain), but not the first C-domain (C1-domain),

in the same manner as that of blood coagulation factors

V and VIII [17–19]

Correspondence to T Matsuda, Department of Applied Molecular

Biosciences, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya

University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.

Fax: + 81 52 789 4128, Tel.: + 81 52 789 4129,

E-mail: tmatsuda@agr.nagoya-u.ac.jp

Abbreviations: MFGM, milk fat globule membrane; DMEM,

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s serum; DAPI,

4¢,6-diamidine-2-phenyl-indole-dihydrochloride; ECL, enhanced chemiluminescence; MVBs,

endocytic multivesicular bodies; GST, glutathione S-transferase.

(Received 19 September 2001, revised 17 December 2001, accepted 2

January 2002)

Trang 2

Recently, MFG-E8 was detected as the major component

of the secretory membrane vesicle (exosome) secreted by a

murine dendritic cell line (D1) [20] Furthermore, a glioma

cell line (C6) has also been shown to secrete MFG-E8 into

the culture media [21] MFG-E8 is also detected

extracell-ularly in embryonic gonad [22] and in sera of patients with

breast tumor metastasis [23] Thus, the results reported so

far suggest that MFG-E8 secreted extracellularly, at least in

some occasions, despite the membrane associated nature of

MFG-E8 Aims of the present study are to elucidate cellular

and extracellular distribution of MFG-E8 expressed in

cultured mammalian cells and to identify domain(s)

responsible for the membrane association and/or secretion

By using transformed COS-7 cells as well as a mammary

epithelial cell line, COMMA-1D expressing MFG-E8, we

have found that MFG-E8 exists not only on the cell surface

but also in association with uncharacterized membrane

vesicles secreted into culture medium The expression of

several domain-deletion mutants of MFG-E8 suggests

contribution of the C2 domain to the association with

PtdSer and plasma membrane and subcontribution of the

C1 domain to the association with plasma membrane

A possible role of MFG-E8 in the vesicular secretion is also

discussed

E X P E R I M E N T A L P R O C E D U R E S

Cell culture

A mouse mammary epithelial cell line, COMMA-1D, and a

monkey kidney cell line, COS-7 were cultured in Dulbecco’s

modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Sigma) containing

10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, penicillin at

100 UÆmL)1, streptomycin at 100 lgÆmL)1at 37°C under

humidified 5% CO2and 95% air

Construction of expression plasmids

and gene transfection

MFG-E8-L and -S expression plasmids were generated as

described previously [9] A truncated MFG-E8-L cDNA

that lacks a region encoding the C1 domain (amino acids

147–306) was constructed as follows The cDNA fragments

upstream and downstream of the C1 domain were amplified

by PCR using the MFG-E8-L expression plasmid as a

template with primer sets containing an XbaI site as follows:

5¢-ATGCAGGTCTCCCGTGTGC-3¢, 5¢-ATTCTAGAG

GCTAGGTTGTTGGAAAG-3¢, 5¢-ATTCTAGAGGAT

GTCTTGAGCCCCTG-3¢ and 5¢-TTCTCGAGCAGGA

CTGAGCATTAACAG-3¢ The two DNA fragments were

ligated at the XbaI site and inserted into a cloning vector

pBluescript KS(+) (Stratagene) As a result of the ligation,

the domain to be deleted was replaced by two amino acids,

serine and arginine, which were translated from the

XbaI-site sequence TCTAGA The cDNA lacking the C1 domain

was then amplified by PCR from the cloned plasmid

with primers containing an EcoRI site at the 5¢ end

(5¢-TAGAATTCCACCATGCAGGTCTCCCGT-3¢) and

an EcoRV site at the 3¢ end (5¢-CAGATATCTTAACAGC

CCAGCAGCTC-3¢) The cDNA lacking the C2 domain

(amino acids 307–463) was created by PCR directly from

the MFG-E8-L expression plasmid with primers containing

an EcoRI site at the 5¢ end as same above and an EcoRV

site at the 3¢ end (5¢-CAGATATCTTAGTGCAACTCAC AGCC-3¢) The two PCR products were cloned into a mammalian expression vector, pEF1/Myc-His C (Invitro-gen), at EcoRI and EcoRV sites, respectively, and were checked by sequencing for PCR errors

COS-7 cells were seeded at a density of 2.5· 105cells per 60-mm dish, and grown overnight in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum The cells were transfected with the plasmid DNA by the calcium phosphate-DNA precipita-tion method [24] After incubaprecipita-tion under 3% CO2and 97% air for 18 h, the transfected cells were washed with NaCl/Pi and cultured under humidified 5% CO2and 95% air Immunofluorescence staining

COS-7 cells were cultured on cover glasses and transfected with MFG-E8s expression plasmids as described above After being cultured in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum for 24 h, cells were washed three times with NaCl/Piand fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde in NaCl/Pi for 8 min for extracellular staining or with methanol chilled

at)20 °C for 5 min for intracellular staining After blocking with NaCl/Picontaining 2% BSA (blocking solution) for

30 min, the specimens were incubated for 60 min with the rabbit antiserum raised against the recombinant glutathione S-transferase (GST)–MFG-E8 fusion protein [8] diluted

1 : 150 in blocking solution and then incubated for 30 min with the secondary antibody, FITC-labeled goat anti-(rabbit IgG) Ig (ICN/Cappel) Samples were then incubated for 15 min with 4¢,6-diamidine-2-phenylindole-dihydrochlo-ride (DAPI) (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) (1 lgÆmL)1 NaCl/Pi) and washed three times with NaCl/Pi Images were acquired by using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus) SDS/PAGE and Western blotting

The transfected cells were cultured in serum-free DMEM for 24 h and then lysed with Ôlysis bufferÕ containing 50 mM Hepes (pH 7.5), 150 mMNaCl, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 5 mMEDTA, 1 mMphenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride and 10 lgÆmL)1leupeptin The culture supernatant of the transfected COS-7 cells was concentrated to one-sixtieth of its original volume by centrifugal filtration through the Mr

10 000 cut-off membrane (Amicon) Proteins in the cell lysate and the culture medium were separated by SDS/ PAGE (10% acrylamide gel) and electrophoretically trans-ferred to the membrane Immobilon-P (Millipore) The membrane was blocked and then sequentially incubated with the rabbit anti-(GST–MFG-E8) serum and peroxi-dase-conjugated goat anti-(rabbit IgG) Ig The protein bands probed with the peroxidase-labeled antibody were visualized with an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech)

Cell surface biotinylation COS-7 cells were plated onto six-well polystyrene plates at a density of 1· 105 cells per well and transfected with the MFG-E8 expression plasmids as described above After incubation in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum for 48 h, the cells were washed three times with cold NaCl/Pi and incubated at 4°C for 30 min in the presence of 0.5 mgÆmL)1

Trang 3

Sulfo-N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide-Biotin (Pierce) After nonreacted biotin was quenched with

serum-free DMEM at 4°C for 5 min, cells were washed

three times with NaCl/Piand then lysed with the lysis buffer

Streptavidin–Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech)

was added to the cell lysate and incubated overnight at

4°C Proteins bound to the Sepharose were precipitated

by centrifugation and washed extensively with a buffer

containing 50 mM Hepes (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl,

10% glycerol, 0.1% Triton X100 and then subjected to

SDS/PAGE followed by Western blotting

Size-exclusion chromatography of the secreted MFG-E8

Culture supernatants from the transfected COS-7 cells

(8· 106cells) grown in serum-free DMEM for 24 h were

concentrated as described above The concentrated

super-natants (500 lL) were subjected to the size-exclusion

chromatography using a Sephacryl S-300 column

(0.9· 60 cm), equilibrated with NaCl/Pi The elution

profiles of MFG-E8 and its mutants were monitored by

ELISA ELISA plate was coated directly with each fraction,

and the antigens were detected by using the rabbit

anti-(GST–MFG-E8) serum and peroxidase-conjugated goat

anti-(rabbit IgG) Ig as described previously [25]

Ultracentrifugation

Culture supernatants from COMMA-1D cells (8· 106

cells) and the transfected COS-7 cells (4· 106cells) were

prepared and concentrated as described above Aliquots

(500 lL) of the concentrated samples were clarified by

sequential centrifugation at 1200 g (10 min) and 10 000 g

(30 min) to eliminate cells and debris In the experiment to

examine the effect of detergent, 50 lL of 10% Triton X-100

was then added to the supernatants of the centrifugation,

followed by the incubation on ice for 10 min These samples

with or without Triton X-100 were ultracentrifuged at

100 000 g for 1 h at 4°C The resulting supernatants were

recovered, while the pellets were resuspended in 100 lL of

NaCl/Picontaining 0.01% sodium azide and 10 lgÆmL)1

leupeptin The presence of MFG-E8 was determined by

Western blotting for both of the supernatants and pellets

Sucrose density-gradient ultracentrifugation

Culture supernatants from the transfected COS-7 cells

(8· 106cells) were prepared and concentrated as described

above Concentrated samples (500 lL) were mixed with

2.5 vol of buffer A [85% (w/v) sucrose in 10 mMTris/HCl

(pH 7.5) containing 150 mMNaCl and 5 mMEDTA], and

placed in centrifuge tubes The mixtures were layered

successively with 4 mL of 60% (w/v), 3 mL of 30% (w/v)

and 1 mL of 5% (w/v) sucrose in buffer A, and centrifuged

at 200 000 g for 18 h at 4°C (Beckman L-70K centrifuge,

SW41 Ti rotor) The fractions with different densities were

collected with 1 mL portions from the top to the bottom of

the tube Each fraction was directly subjected to SDS/

PAGE followed by Western blotting

Phospholipid-binding assay by ELISA

The ELISA for MFG-E8 binding to solid-phase

phospho-lipid was performed as described previously [7]

L-a-phosphatidyl-L-serine (Sigma) in methanol (10 lgÆmL)1) was added to a micro well plate (Nunc) (30 lLÆwell)1) followed by drying at 37°C The plate was washed three times between all subsequent steps with NaCl/ Tris containing 0.05% Tween-20 The plate was blocked with 200 lL of NaCl/Tris containing 0.05% (w/v) gelatine (blocking buffer) Culture supernatants of the transfected COS-7 cells were concentrated to one-fourth of its original volume Appropriate amounts of total proteins in the supernatants were then diluted in 50 lL of blocking buffer, and were added per well, followed by incubation at 4°C overnight The plate was then incubated with anti-(GST– MFG-E8) serum and peroxidase-labeled goat anti-(rabbit IgG) Ig as the secondary antibody, and peroxidase activity was measured

Scanning electron microscopy Samples for scanning electron microscopy analysis were prepared essentially as previously described for microvesi-cles [26] Culture supernatants of the transfected COS-7 cells (2· 106cells) cultured in serum-free DMEM for 48 h were centrifuged at 10 000 g for 30 min to eliminate cells and debris The supernatants were then centrifuged at 200 000 g for 1.5 h at 4°C The pellets were resuspended in 100 lL of NaCl/Tris with 0.01% sodium azide and 10 lgÆmL)1 leupeptin The suspended samples were placed onto micro-scope glass slides, previously treated with poly L-lysine (Sigma) for 30 min, and then fixed with 1% OsO4 for

2 h The samples were dehydrated in a series of ethanol (50–100%), critical-point dried in a CO2system After being platinum/palladium-coated in a spattering devise, the speci-mens were observed with a scanning electron microscope (JSM-820, Japan Electron Optics Laboratory)

R E S U L T S

Cellular and extracellular distribution of MFG-E8 and its domain deletion mutants expressed in COS-7 cells

To investigate cell surface distribution of MFG-E8 and contribution of each domain to the cellular localization, several domain-deletion mutant genes for MFG-E8 was constructed (Fig 1) and transiently expressed in COS-7 cells The transfected cells were fixed, and the cell surface and intracellular MFG-E8 proteins were detected by indirect immunofluorescence staining using the antibody specific for MFG-E8 As shown in Fig 2, under a nonpermeable condition the two wild-type MFG-E8 proteins (MFG-E8-L and -S) were detected as many dots

on the surface of transfected cells, whereas no signal was detected for the two C-domain deletion mutants (DC1 and DC2) Under permeable conditions, however, all of MFG-E8 and deletion mutants were clearly detected in cyto-plasm No signal was detected under permeable or nonpermeable conditions for an empty-vector (mock) transfectant Thus, MFG-E8, expressed in COS-7 cells, localized on the cell surface and both of the two C-domains were indispensable for such a cell surface localization of MFG-E8 A possibility that cytosolic MFG-E8 was stained under the nonpermeable condition could be excluded because DC1 and DC2 were not detected under the same condition

Trang 4

As the expression and localization of MFG-E8 and its

deletion mutants in COS-7 cells was revealed

immunocyto-chemically, biochemical analyses including cell surface

biotinylation were done subsequently for both of the

transfected cells and their culture supernatants As shown

in Fig 3, MFG-E8-L and -S were clearly labeled by the cell

surface biotinylation, confirming their existence on the cell

surface In contrast, only weak or almost no bands were

detected for the C-domain deletion mutants, indicating that

they did not retain on the cell surface When the culture

supernatants were analyzed, considerable amounts of the

C-domain deletion mutants were found to be secreted into

the culture medium Furthermore, MFG-E8-L and -S were

detected in culture supernatant, indicating that they were

not only plasma-membrane-associated but also secreted

While three size-variants (66, 56 and 51 kDa) for MFG-E8-L

were detected in the total cell lysate and cell-surface

biotinylated proteins, secreted MFG-E8-L was only a single

band of 66 kDa On the other hand, the molecular mass of

MFG-E8-S was 51 kDa regardless its secretory or cellular

form Both of DC1 (47 kDa) and DC2 (43 kDa) in the

culture media were markedly larger in size than those of

cellular forms in the cell lysate (38 and 34 kDa)

The MFG-E8, but not the C-domain deletion mutants,

is secreted as a constituent of high-molecular mass

complex and binds to phosphatidylserine

Molecular sizes of the MFG-E8-L, -S and its C-domain

deletion mutants secreted in the culture medium were

estimated by size exclusion chromatography using a

Sephacryl S-300 column (Fig 4) Both of the ELISA and

immunoblot analysis revealed that the wild-type proteins,

MFG-E8-L and -S, were eluted in the void volume fractions

(fraction numbers 16–18) much earlier than expected

Therefore, the secreted MFG-E8 was found to behave as

high molecular mass complex(es) On the other hand, the

C-domain deletion mutants were eluted in fractions 26–28,

which corresponded to the elution volume for a 43-kDa

protein (ovalbumin) The molecular masses estimated for

the C-domain deletion mutants by this size exclusion chromatography agreed well with those by SDS/PAGE (Fig 3), indicating that the secreted DC1 and DC2 proteins were monomeric When the elution profiles of the two C-domain deletion mutants were compared, the peak of DC1 was obviously broader than that of DC2

In some previous reports, the C2 domain of MFG-E8 as well as that of blood clotting factors V and VIII has been shown to be a binding-domain to PtdSer or PtdSer-rich

Fig 2 Cell surface localization of MFG-E8 depending on the C-domains COS-7 cells were transfected with plasmids containing MFG-E8-L (A and B), MFG-E8-S (C and D), DC1 (E and F) and DC2 (G and H) or empty plasmid (I and J) Transfectants were fixed and stained with the antiserum specific for MFG-E8 followed by FITC-labeled secondary antibodies The immunostaining was done with permeabilization (B, D, F, H and J) or without (A, C, E, G and I) The cells were also stained with DAPI to visualize nuclei Note that only two wild-type MFG-E8s containing both of two C-domains (A and C) were stained on cell surface, whereas intracellular MFG-E8 was stained for all of the transfectants (B, D, F and H).

Fig 1 A schematic representation of MFG-E8 and its mutant proteins.

MFG-E8-L, a long form (a lactation mammary grand specific form) of

MFG-E8; MFG-E8-S, a short form (an ubiquitous form) of MFG-E8;

DC1, MFG-E8-L lacking C1 domain; DC2, MFG-E8-L lacking C2

domain Signal sequence (SS), tandem EGF-like repeat (EGF1,

EGF2) and Pro/Thr-rich domain followed by two C-domains (C1, C2)

are shown.

Trang 5

membrane [8,12,16] Therefore, the PtdSer-binding ability

of the secreted MFG-E8 and its C-domain deletion mutants was examined by ELISA using polystylene microtiter plate coated with PtdSer MFG-E8-L and -S as well as DC1 showed the PtdSer-binding in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig 5) The DC2 protein, however, did not bind to the PtdSer-coated plates even at higher concentrations

The high molecular mass complexes containing MFG-E8 are membrane-derived vesicles

The high molecular mass of secreted forms of MFG–E8 suggested certain interaction of an MFG-E8 molecule with some other molecule(s) including MFG-E8 itself in a case of homophilic association To determine whether the secreted MFG-E8 associates with proteins or other components such as lipid, phospholipid and membrane vesicle, the culture supernatant was ultracentrifuged at 100 000 g in the presence or absence of a nonionic detergent, Triton X-100, and then both of the precipitate and supernatant were subjected to Western blotting analysis for MFG-E8 As shown in Fig 6, in the absence of the detergent, about a half

of the secreted MFG-E8 or more was precipitated under this centrifugation condition, whereas DC2 was not The sizes of MFG-E8-L, -S and DC2 bands seen in the precipitates or supernatants were consistent with those of the concentrated culture media Fig 3, lanes 6–10

Interest-Fig 4 Size-exclusion chromatography of the secreted MFG-E8 Culture supernatants of MFG-E8-L (A), MFG-E8-S (B), DC1 (C) and DC2 (D) transfectants were concentrated and applied to a Sephacryl S-300 column Each fraction was monitored by ELISA using the antiserum specific for MFG-E8 The peak positions of blue dextran (V 0 ) and ovalbumin (43 kDa) are indicated with arrowheads Each fraction was analyzed by Western blotting with the antiserum specific for MFG-E8 (lower panels).

Fig 3 Western blot analyses for cell surface and secreted MFG-E8.

COS-7 cells were transfected with plasmids containing MFG-E8-L

(lanes 2, 7 and 12), MFG-E8-S (lanes 3, 8 and 13), DC1 (lanes 4, 9 and

14) and DC2 (lanes 5, 10 and 15) or empty plasmid (lanes 1, 6 and 11).

Transfected COS-7 cells were cultured in serum-free medium

(DMEM) for 24 h The cells were subjected to cell surface labeling with

sulfo-NHS-biotin and then lysed with the lysis buffer containing 1%

Triton X-100 Biotinylated proteins were precipitated with

Streptavi-din–Sepharose The media were collected and concentrated by

centri-fugal filtration Streptavidin-precipitates (lanes 1–5), the concentrated

media (lanes 6–10) and the total cell lysates (lanes 11–15) were analyzed

by SDS/PAGE followed by Western blotting with the antiserum

spe-cific for MFG-E8 Note that only MFG-E8-L (lane 2) and MFG-E8-S

(lane 3) were biotinylated, whereas all of the MFG-E8 and its mutants

were expressed and secreted (lanes 6–15) Positions of molecular-mass

standards are indicated on the right.

Trang 6

ingly, MFG-E8 was no longer precipitated when the

detergent was added to the culture supernatant prior to

the ultracentrifugation We previously reported that

COMMA-1D cells endogenously expressed MFG-E8-S

and a small amount of MFG-E8-L mRNAs [9] To clarify

whether MFG-E8 expressed in COMMA-1D cells was

secreted with membrane vesicles, the culture supernatant of

COMMA-1D cells was ultracentrifuged By the Western

blotting analysis, two bands (66 and 51 kDa) of MFG-E8

were detected in the precipitate, but not in the supernatant

(Fig 6), indicating that both of the MFG-E8 proteins

secreted by COMMA-ID cells were completely precipitated

under the ultracentrifugation condition used

The precipitation by ultracentrifugation at 100 000 g and

solubilization by Triton X-100 strongly suggested that the

secreted MFG-E8 was present in the culture medium as a

constituent of membrane vesicles, possibly in association

with membrane phospholipid To confirm the assumption

that MFG-E8 was secreted as a component of membrane

vesicles, the culture supernatant containing secreted

MFG-E8 was subjected to the sucrose density-gradient

ultracentrifugation analysis Figure 7 shows typical

distri-bution profiles with the density gradient for wild-type

MFG-E8 and the C-domain deletion mutants Both of

MFG-E8-L and -S were detected in the fractions of lower

equilibrium-densities from 1.08 to 1.24 The two C-domain

deletion mutants, in contrast, were not at all detected in such

low-density fractions

Thus, the MFG-E8 complex secreted in the culture

supernatant exhibited some characteristic properties, such

as higher sedimentation velocity, detergent sensitivity and

lower specific gravity, which were just like those of the

microsome fraction of cell homogenates To identify the

MFG-E8 complex as membrane vesicle, the MFG-E8

complex fraction recovered from the culture supernatant by the ultracentrifugation was observed under scanning elec-tron microscopy Some typical elecelec-tron micrograms are shown in Fig 8, in which small vesicles with diameter in a range of 100–200 nm and aggregations of the vesicles were observed The number of vesicles per microscopic field (11.9· 9.2 lm) was counted for randomly selected five fields, and the average value for each transfectant is shown

in Fig 8 The numbers of vesicles counted for MFG-E8-L and -S were about 3–4 times that of DC2 or mock The counting for two independent transfectants gave similar results

D I S C U S S I O N

MFG-E8 was originally identified as one of the major MFGM glycoproteins [1,15,27] Cloning of the MFG-E8 cDNA and structural analysis of the predicted peptide sequence has revealed that MFG-E8 lacks the transmem-brane regions and is a peripheral memtransmem-brane protein [1] Many tissues besides the lactating mammary gland in some mammals are reported to express MFG-E8 [7–9] Previous reports have also shown that MFG-E8 is secreted into sera

of patients with breast tumor metastasis and the culture supernatant of some cell lines [20,21,23], and that MFG-E8 purified from MFGM binds to avb5 and avb3 integrins and promotes cell adhesion [7,11,12] Therefore, MFG-E8 is considered to contribute to cell–cell and/or cell–matrix interactions in various tissues Nevertheless, in spite of the cell adhesive ability, the localization of MFG-E8 in vivo remains obscure, and it is not known even whether MFG-E8 is a membrane bound protein or secretory Here,

Fig 5 In vitro PtdSer-binding of MFG-E8 Wells were coated with

PtdSer and blocked with 0.05% gelatine Then various amounts of the

culture supernatants of MFG-E8-L (closed squares), MFG-E8-S

(open squares), DC1 (open triangles), DC2 (closed triangles) and mock

(open circles) transfectants were added After incubation, biding of

MFG-E8 to the PtdSer-coated plate was monitored with the antiserum

specific for MFG-E8.

Fig 6 Detection of MFG-E8 in the membrane vesicle fraction COS-7 cells were transfected with plasmids containing MFG-E8-L (lanes 1 and 2), MFG-E8-S (lanes 3–6) and DC2 (lanes 7 and 8) and were also cultured in a serum-free medium (DMEM) for 24 h COMMA-1D cells (lanes 9 and 10) were cultured in DMEM for 72 h The culture supernatants were concentrated and sequentially centrifuged at 1200 g and 10 000 g to eliminate cells and debris Then, the membrane vesi-cles were pelleted at 100 000 g In some experiments, the media were added 1% Triton X-100 before the ultracentrifugation (lanes 5 and 6) The resultant pellets (P) and supernatants (S) were analyzed by SDS/ PAGE followed by Western blotting with the antiserum specific for MFG-E8 Note that Triton X-100 treatment abrogated the recovery

of secreted MFG-E8 in the membrane vesicle fraction Positions of molecular-mass standards are indicated on the right.

Trang 7

we investigated the cellular localization of MFG-E8

expressed in COS-7 cells The results of

immunocyto-chemistry (Fig 2) and the cell-surface biotinylation study

(Fig 3) clearly demonstrated that MFG-E8 was present

peripherally as small dots on the cell surface On the contrary, a transmembrane-type MFGM glycoprotein, butyrophilin [27,28], expressed in COS-7 cells was detected evenly the whole surface of the cells (Oshima, K., Fukushiro, A., Aoki, N., Kitajima, K & Matsuda, T., unpublished data) Thus, MFG-E8 appeared to be unique

in such an uneven localization on plasma membrane In spite of the cell-surface localization, MFG-E8-L and -S were also found to be secreted to the culture supernatants (Fig 3) Secreted MFG-E8-L and -S were identified as 66 and 51 kDa by SDS/PAGE, respectively However, they were recovered only in the void volume fractions where molecules with sizes higher than 150 kDa were eluted (Fig 4) Furthermore, the results of the ultracentrifugation

at 100 000 g (Fig 6) and the sucrose density-gradient ultracentrifugation (Fig 7) suggested that secreted MFG-E8 was associated with membrane vesicles This was strongly supported by solubilization of the MFG-E8 complex with Triton X-100 (Fig 6) Recently, Thery et al reported that MFG-E8 is secreted from dendritic cell line, D1, as a major constituent of the exosome [20] Indeed, scanning electron microscopy revealed the existence of small particles with a size ranging between 100 and 200 nm in the culture supernatants from COS-7 cells (Fig 8) Therefore, it was suggested that COS-7 cells secreted exosome-like membrane vesicles and that MFG-E8 was secreted as a complex with the exosome-like membrane vesicles It was also observed that MFG-E8 expressed endogenously in COMMA-1D cells was secreted and precipitated in the membrane vesicle fraction (Fig 6) Because COMMA-1D cells was shown to express both of MFG-E8-L and -S [9], the 66 and 51 kDa bands secreted by COMMA-1D cells are regarded as their translational products, MFG-E8-L and -S, respectively Therefore, this membrane vesicle association of

Fig 7 Fractionation of secreted MFG-E8 by floatation on sucrose

density-gradient COS-7 cells transfected with plasmids containing

MFG-E8-L, MFG-E8-S, DC1 and DC2 were cultured in serum-free

medium for 24 h Culture supernatants were collected and

concen-trated by centrifugal filtration After elimination of cells and debris by

centrifugation, the supernatants were loaded on continuous sucrose

density-gradient (0.15–2.5 M sucrose, resulting ranging 1.02–

1.32 gÆmL)1) followed by ultracentrifugation The fractions were

recovered and analyzed by SDS/PAGE followed by Western blotting

with the antiserum specific for MFG-E8.

Fig 8 Scanning electron micrographs of membrane particles derived from COS-7 cells transfected with MFG-E8 The precipitates at 100 000 g obtained from the culture supernatants of MFG-E8-L (A), MFG-E8-S (B), DC2 (C) and mock (D) transfectants were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy as described in Experimental procedures Aggregates obtained from MFG-E8-L (A) and mock (D) transfectants were shown in the insets Original magnification, 10 000 · ; Scale bar ¼ 1 lm The number of the vesicles from each transfectant was counted for five different microscopic fields and represented by an average ± SD (E).

Trang 8

MFG-E8 would not be due to artifacts resulted from the

overexpression in transformed heterologous cells We also

tested whether butyrophilin expressed in COS-7 cells

associates with this exosome-like membrane vesicles

How-ever, butyrophilin was recovered neither from the culture

supernatant nor the membrane vesicle fraction (Oshima, K.,

Aoki, N., Kitajima, K., & Matsuda, T., unpublished data)

Therefore, the membrane vesicles derived from COS-7 cells

would accumulate MFG-E8 selectively

The C2 domain of the blood clotting factor V and factor

VIII is essential for binding to PtdSer-rich membrane and

thus for procoagulant activity [17,29,30] In agreement with

this, some investigators have shown that the C2 domain of

MFG-E8 is necessary for binding to PtdSer and the surface

of the MFGM and cells [12,14,16] Therefore, MFG-E8 is

thought to bind to the membrane surface through the C2

domain In the present study, however, not only DC2 but

also DC1 were shown to be monomeric (Fig 4) and absent

on the cell surface (Figs 2 and 3) and in the membrane

vesicle fraction (Fig 7) These results indicate that both of

C1 and C2 domains of MFG-E8 are indispensable for the

association with the cell surface and the membrane vesicles

In the in vitro assay system, on the other hand, DC1 lacking

the ability to associate with the cell surface and the

exosome-like membrane vesicles showed the PtdSer binding ability

(Fig 5), indicating that only C2 domain was required and

enough for binding to PtdSer coated on the plate This

binding by C2 domain alone might be due to a high density

of PtdSer on polystylene surface compared with cell

membrane Thus, the C1 domain would also contribute as

a sub binding-domain to the MFG–E8 association with the

cell surface and the membrane vesicles in vivo The failure of

the DC1 and DC2 proteins to associate with the COS-7 cell

surface, form high molecular mass complexes and bind cell

membrane vesicles is not simply explained by a loss of

overall hydrophobicity, because the deletion of C1 domain

did not change the overall hydrophobicity In fact, the DC1

protein had the PtdSer-binding ability probably through the

remaining C2 domain regarded as a phospholipid-binding

domain Consequently, the membrane association of

MFG-E8-L and -S is supposed to be specific for the both

of C1 and C2 domain structures

Some types of cells are known to release lipid bilayer

vesicles by unique mechanisms including apocrine, shedding

and budding-off The secretion of various membrane

vesicles into the extracellular space is a frequent

phenom-enon described in normal and tumoral cells [31]

Hemato-poietic cells, adhesive cells and tumor cells release two types

of membrane vesicles, exosomes and microvesicles, from

different mechanisms In the present study, scanning

electron microscopy showed that COS-7 cells secreted small

particles with sizes ranging from 100 to 200 nm (Fig 8)

This size range of the particles observed agrees well with this

exosomes and microvesicles Exosomes have been measured

40–100 nm in diameter Exosomes originate from endocytic

multivesicular bodies (MVBs) and are released in an

exocytic manner [32] Although functions of exosomes

remain largely to be resolved, they are thought to play

immunoregulatory and antitumoral roles [20,32–34]

Micro-vesicles have been measured from 100 nm to 1 lm in

diameter Microvesicles originate from the cell surface

membrane and are directly shedded into the extracellular

space [31,35–37] Although they derive from the plasma

membrane, the shedded microvesicles have different lipid and protein compositions [34,37–41] Membrane shedding

is important for the membrane turn over and tumor ganglioside metabolism [41] Nevertheless, the processes of exosome secretion and membrane shedding are scarcely understood

Two mechanisms for the secretion the exosome-like membrane vesicles containing MFG-E8 have been hypoth-esised from our present data and those of some other investigators [20,31,32] One hypothesis is that MFG-E8 is secreted as exosomes in an exocytic manner COS-7 cells expressed three size-variants (66, 56 and 51 kDa) for MFG-E8-L on the cell surface but secreted only the 66-kDa form (Fig 3) Therefore, MFG-E8 may be secreted as exosomes through a pathway different from one transporting the cell surface types of MFG-E8 Exosomes secreted by B lympho-cytes were recovered in the fractions corresponding to densities of 1.08–1.22 gÆmL)1[42], similar to the densities where MFG-E8-L and -S were detected (1.08–1.24 gÆmL)1) (Fig 7) This also suggests an exosome-like secretion mechanism Another possible mechanism is membrane shedding The size of the small vesicles in COS-7 culture medium resembles that of shedded microvesicles more closely than that of exosomes previously reported [36,37, 40, 43], supporting the second mechanism MFG-E8-L and -S were detected as dot-like staining, but butyrophilin was not

It might be possible that MFG-E8 molecules are clustered

on the cell surface by binding to the particular regions or molecules and then released by membrane shedding to the culture supernatant as a component of the membrane vesicles Approximately half of the MFG-E8, however, remained in the high density fractions (Fig 7), and MFG-E8 was not completely precipitated by the ultracen-trifugation (Fig 6) These results imply that MFG-E8 was also secreted as a complex with micelles The exosome-like membrane vesicles secreted by COS-7 cells would differ from apoptotic vesicles, because DC2, which present in cytoplasm, was precipitated at 10 000 g but not at

100 000 g (data not shown) [44]

We found that the DC2 and mock transfectants of COS-7 cells also secreted the exosome-like membrane vesicles to the culture supernatant However, the vesicles and aggregates were detected more in the culture supernatants of

MFG-E8-L and -S transfectants than in those of the DC2 and mock transfectants (Fig 8) These results strongly suggest that MFG-E8, membrane-associated through the C2 domain, plays a certain positive role in the membrane secretion by some mammalian cells

Milk lipids are synthesized in differentiated mammary epithelial cells and secreted from the apical side of the cells as a droplet surrounded by plasma membrane referred to as MFGM [45–47], in which considerable amounts of MFG-E8 exist The milk fat globules range in size from under 0.2 to over 10 lm in diameter, and 80%

or more of the total number of globules are below 1 lm Formation of the complex of butyrophilin, xanthine oxidase and surface molecules of cytoplasmic lipid drop-lets is speculated to be essential for expulsion of milk fat droplets [15,47] The MFG-E8 secretion as membrane vesicles observed in the present study suggests that MFG-E8 expressed in the lactating mammary gland plays specific roles in secretion of the milk lipid, especially of the small lipid globules

Trang 9

A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T

This research was supported in part by Grants-in Aid for Scientific

Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture

of Japan (to T M., K K., N A and K O.).

R E F E R E N C E S

1 Stubbs, J.D., Lekutis, C., Singer, K.L., Bui, A., Yuzuki, D.,

Srinivasan, U & Parry, G (1990) cDNA cloning of a mouse

mammary epithelial cell surface protein reveals the existence of

epidermal growth factor-like domains linked to factor VIII-like

sequences Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87, 8417–8421.

2 Aoki, N., Kishi, M., Taniguchi, Y., Adachi, T., Nakamura, R &

Matsuda, T (1995) Molecular cloning of glycoprotein antigens

MGP57/53 recognized by monoclonal antibodies raised against

bovine milk fat globule membrane Biochim Biophys Acta 1245,

385–391.

3 Hvarregaard, J., Andersen, M.H., Berglund, L., Rasmussen, J.T.

& Petersen, T.E (1996) Characterization of glycoprotein PAS-6/7

from membranes of bovine milk fat globules Eur J Biochem 240,

628–636.

4 Larocca, D., Peterson, J.A., Urrea, R., Kuniyoshi, J., Bistrain,

A.M & Ceriani, R.L (1991) A M r 46 000 human milk fat globule

protein that is highly expressed in human breast tumors contains

factor VIII-like domains Cancer Res 51, 4994–4998.

5 Couto, J.R., Taylor, M.R., Godwin, S.G., Ceriani, R.L &

Peterson, J.A (1996) Cloning and sequence analysis of human

breast epithelial antigen BA46 reveals an RGD cell adhesion

sequence presented on an epidermal growth factor-like domain.

DNA Cell Biol 15, 281–286.

6 Ogura, K., Nara, K., Watanabe, Y., Kohno, K., Tai, T & Sanai, Y.

(1996) Cloning and expression of cDNA for O-acetylation of GD3

ganglioside Biochem Biophys Res Commun 225, 932–938.

7 Andersen, M.H., Berglund, L., Rasmussen, J.T & Petersen,

T.E (1997) Bovine PAS-6/7 binds alpha v beta 5 integrins and

anionic phospholipids through two domains Biochemistry 36,

5441–5446.

8 Aoki, N., Ishii, T., Ohira, S., Yamaguchi, Y., Negi, M., Adachi,

T., Nakamura, R & Matsuda, T (1997) Stage specific expression

of milk fat globule membrane glycoproteins in mouse mammary

gland: comparison of MFG-E8, butyrophilin, and CD36 with

a major milk protein, beta-casein Biochim Biophys Acta 1334,

182–190.

9 Oshima, K., Aoki, N., Negi, M., Kishi, M., Kitajima, K &

Matsuda, T (1999) Lactation-dependent expression of an mRNA

splice variant with an exon for a multiply O-glycosylated domain

of mouse milk fat globule glycoprotein MFG-E8 Biochem

Bio-phys Res Commun 254, 522–528.

10 Hynes, R.O (1992) Integrins: versatility, modulation, and

signa-ling in cell adhesion Cell 69, 11–25.

11 Taylor, M.R., Couto, J.R., Scallan, C.D., Ceriani, R.L &

Peterson, J.A (1997) Lactadherin (formerly BA46), a

membrane-associated glycoprotein expressed in human milk and breast

carcinomas, promotes Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD)-dependent cell

adhesion DNA Cell Biol 16, 861–869.

12 Andersen, M.H., Graversen, H., Fedosov, S.N., Petersen, T.E &

Rasmussen, J.T (2000) Functional analyses of two cellular

binding domains of bovine lactadherin Biochemistry 39, 6200–

6206.

13 Basch, J.J., Farrell, H.M & Greenberg, R (1976) Identification of

the milk fat globule membrane proteins I Isolation and partial

characterization of glycoprotein B Biochim Biophys Acta 448,

589–598.

14 Peterson, J.A., Couto, J.R., Taylor, M.R & Ceriani, R.L (1995)

Selection of tumor-specific epitopes on target antigens for

radio-immunotherapy of breast cancer Cancer Res 55, 5847–5851.

15 Mather, I.H (2000) A review and proposed nomenclature for major proteins of the milk-fat globule membrane J Dairy Sci 83, 203–247.

16 Peterson, J.A., Patton, S & Hamosh, M (1998) Glycoproteins of the human milk fat globule in the protection of the breast-fed infant against infections Biol Neonate 74, 143–162.

17 Pellequer, J.L., Gale, A.J., Griffin, J.H & Getzoff, E.D (1998) Homology models of the C domains of blood coagulation factors

V and VIII: a proposed membrane binding mode for FV and FVIII C2 domains Blood Cells Mol Dis 24, 448–461.

18 Macedo-Ribeiro, S., Bode, W., Huber, R., Quinn-Allen, M.A., Kim, S.W., Ortel, T.L., Bourenkov, G.P., Bartunik, H.D., Stubbs, M.T., Kane, W.H & Fuentes-Prior, P (1999) Crystal structures of the membrane-binding C2 domain of human coagulation factor

V Nature 402, 434–439.

19 Pratt, K.P., Shen, B.W., Takeshima, K., Davie, E.W., Fujikawa,

K & Stoddard, B.L (1999) Structure of the C2 domain of human factor VIII at 1.5 A˚ resolution Nature 402, 439–442.

20 Thery, C., Regnault, A., Garin, J., Wolfers, J., Zitvogel, L., Ricciardi-Castagnoli, P., Raposo, G & Amigorena, S (1999) Molecular characterization of dendritic cell-derived exosomes Selective accumulation of the heat shock protein hsc73 J Cell Biol 147, 599–610.

21 Goldberg, G.S., Bechberger, J.F., Tajima, Y., Merritt, M., Omori, Y., Gawinowicz, M.A., Narayanan, R., Tan, Y., Sanai, Y., Yamasaki, H., Naus, C.C., Tsuda, H & Nicholson, B.J (2000) Connexin43 suppresses MFG-E8 while inducing contact growth inhibition of glioma cells Cancer Res 60, 6018–6026.

22 Kanai, Y., Kanai-Azuma, M., Tajima, Y., Birk, O.S., Hayashi, Y.

& Sanai, Y (2000) Identification of a stromal cell type char-acterized by the secretion of a soluble integrin-binding protein, MFG-E8, in mouse early gonadogenesis Mech Dev 96, 223–227.

23 Salinas, F.A., Wee, K.H & Ceriani, R.L (1987) Significance of breast carcinoma-associated antigens as a monitor of tumor bur-den: characterization by monoclonal antibodies Cancer Res 47, 907–913.

24 Chen, C & Okayama, H (1987) High-efficiency transformation of mammalian cells by plasmid DNA Mol Cell Biol 7, 2745–2752.

25 Aoki, N., Kuroda, H., Urabe, M., Taniguchi, Y., Adachi, T., Nakamura, R & Matsuda, T (1994) Production and char-acterization of monoclonal antibodies directed against bovine milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) Biochim Biophys Acta

1199, 87–95.

26 Martinez-Lorenzo, M.J., Anel, A., Gamen, S., Monle, N.I., Lasierra, P., Larrad, L., Pineiro, A., Alava, M.A & Naval, J (1999) Activated human T cells release bioactive Fas ligand and APO2 ligand in microvesicles J Immunol 163, 1274–1281.

27 Mather, I.H., Tamplin, C.B & Irving, M.G (1980) Separation of the proteins of bovine milk-fat-globule membrane by electro-focusing with retention of enzymatic and immunological activity Eur J Biochem 110, 327–336.

28 Mather, I.H & Jack, L.J (1993) A review of the molecular and cellular biology of butyrophilin, the major protein of bovine milk fat globule membrane J Dairy Sci 76, 3832–3850.

29 Isaacs, B.S., Husten, E.J., Esmon, C.T & Johnson, A.E (1986)

A domain of membrane-bound blood coagulation factor Va is located far from the phospholipid surface A fluorescence energy transfer measurement Biochemistry 25, 4958–4969.

30 Kalafatis, M., Jenny, R.J & Mann, K.G (1990) Identification and characterization of a phospholipid-binding site of bovine factor

Va J Biol Chem 265, 21580–21589.

31 Dainiak, N (1991) Surface membrane-associated regulation of cell assembly, differentiation, and growth Blood 78, 264–276.

32 Denzer, K., Kleijmeer, M.J., Heijnen, H.F., Stoorvogel, W & Geuze, H.J (2000) Exosome: from internal vesicle of the multi-vesicular body to intercellular signaling device J Cell Sci 113 Part 19, 3365–3374.

Trang 10

33 Zitvogel, L., Regnault, A., Lozier, A., Wolfers, J., Flament, C.,

Tenza, D., Ricciardi-Castagnoli, P., Raposo, G & Amigorena, S.

(1998) Eradication of established murine tumors using a novel

cell-free vaccine: dendritic cell-derived exosomes Nat Med 4, 594–

600.

34 Wolfers, J., Lozier, A., Raposo, G., Regnault, A., Thery, C.,

Masurier, C., Flament, C., Pouzieux, S., Faure, F., Tursz, T.,

Angevin, E., Amigorena, S & Zitvogel, L (2001) Tumor-derived

exosomes are a source of shared tumor rejection antigens for CTL

cross-priming Nat Med 7, 297–303.

35 Dolo, V., Ginestra, A., Cassara, D., Violini, S., Lucania, G.,

Torrisi, M.R., Nagase, H., Canevari, S., Pavan, A & Vittorelli,

M.L (1998) Selective localization of matrix metalloproteinase 9,

beta1 integrins, and human lymphocyte antigen class I molecules

on membrane vesicles shed by 8701-BC breast carcinoma cells.

Cancer Res 58, 4468–4474.

36 Heijnen, H.F., Schiel, A.E., Fijnheer, R., Geuze, H.J & Sixma,

J.J (1999) Activated platelets release two types of membrane

vesicles: microvesicles by surface shedding and exosomes derived

from exocytosis of multivesicular bodies and alpha-granules.

Blood 94, 3791–3799.

37 Dolo, V., Li, R., Dillinger, M., Flati, S., Manela, J., Taylor, B.J.,

Pavan, A & Ladisch, S (2000) Enrichment and localization of

ganglioside G (D3) and caveolin-1 in shed tumor cell membrane

vesicles Biochim Biophys Acta 1486, 265–274.

38 Van Blitterswijk, W.J., De Veer, G., Krol, J.H & Emmelot, P.

(1982) Comparative lipid analysis of purified plasma membranes

and shed extracellular membrane vesicles from normal murine

thymocytes and leukemic GRSL cells Biochim Biophys Acta.

688, 495–504.

39 Lerner, M.P., Lucid, S.W., Wen, G.J & Nordquist, R.E (1983) Selected area membrane shedding by tumor cells Cancer Lett 20, 125–130.

40 Ginestra, A., Monea, S., Seghezzi, G., Dolo, V., Nagase, H., Mignatti, P & Vittorelli, M.L (1997) Urokinase plasminogen activator and gelatinases are associated with membrane vesicles shed by human HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells J Biol Chem 272, 17216–17222.

41 Kong, Y., Li, R & Ladisch, S (1998) Natural forms of shed tumor gangliosides Biochim Biophys Acta 1394, 43–56.

42 Raposo, G., Nijman, H.W., Stoorvogel, W., Liejendekker, R., Harding, C.V., Melief, C.J & Geuze, H.J (1996) B lymphocytes secrete antigen-presenting vesicles J Exp Med 183, 1161–1172.

43 Clayton, A., Court, J., Navabi, H., Adams, M., Mason, M.D., Hobot, J.A., Newman, G.R & Jasani, B (2001) Analysis of antigen presenting cell derived exosomes, based on immuno-magnetic isolation and flow cytometry J Immunol Methods 247, 163–174.

44 Thery, C., Boussac, M., Veron, P., Ricciardi-Castagnoli, P., Rap-oso, G., Garin, J & Amigorena, S (2001) Proteomic analysis of dendritic cell-derived exosomes: a secreted subcellular compart-ment distinct from apoptotic vesicles J Immunol 166, 7309–7818.

45 Mather, I.H (1987) The Mammary Grand, Development, Regula-tion, and Function (Neville, M.C & Daniel, C.W., eds), pp 217–

267 Plenum Publishing Corp, New York.

46 Deyrup-Olsen, I & Luchtel, D.L (1998) Secretion of mucous granules and other membrane-bound structures: a look beyond exocytosis Int Rev Cytol 183, 95–141.

47 Mather, I.H & Keenan, T.W (1998) Origin and secretion of milk lipids J Mamm Gland Biol Neoplasia 3, 259–273.

Ngày đăng: 24/03/2014, 03:21

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm