1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Báo cáo Y học: The function of methyl-menaquinone-6 and polysul®de reductase membrane anchor (PsrC) in polysul®de respiration ofWolinella succinogenes doc

10 491 0
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề The function of methyl-menaquinone-6 and polysul®de reductase membrane anchor (PsrC) in polysul®de respiration of Wolinella succinogenes
Tác giả Wiebke Dietrich, Oliver Klimmek
Trường học Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität
Chuyên ngành Biochemistry
Thể loại thesis
Năm xuất bản 2002
Thành phố Frankfurt am Main
Định dạng
Số trang 10
Dung lượng 477,99 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

The function of methyl-menaquinone-6 and polysul®de reductase membrane anchor PsrC in polysul®de respiration Wiebke Dietrich and Oliver Klimmek Institut fuÈr Mikrobiologie, Johann Wolfga

Trang 1

The function of methyl-menaquinone-6 and polysul®de reductase membrane anchor (PsrC) in polysul®de respiration

Wiebke Dietrich and Oliver Klimmek

Institut fuÈr Mikrobiologie, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-UniversitaÈt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Wolinella succinogenes grows by oxidative phosphorylation

with polysul®de as terminal electron acceptor and either H2

or formate as electron donor (polysul®de respiration) The

function of the respiratory chains catalyzing these reactions

was investigated Proteoliposomes containing polysul®de

reductase (Psr) and either hydrogenase or formate

dehy-drogenase isolated from the membrane fraction of Wolinella

succinogenes catalyzed polysul®de respiration, provided that

methyl-menaquinone-6 isolated from W succinogenes was

also present The speci®c activities of electron transport were

commensurate with those of the bacterial membrane

frac-tion Using site-directed mutagenesis, certain residues were

substituted in PsrC, the membrane anchor of polysul®de

reductase Replacement of Y23, D76, Y159, D218, E225 or R305 caused nearly full inhibition of polysul®de respiration without a€ecting the activity of Psr, which was still bound to the membrane These residues are predicted to be located in hydrophobic helices of PsrC, or next to them Substitution of

13 other residues of PsrC either caused partial inhibition

of polysul®de respiration or had no e€ect The function of methyl-menaquinone-6, which is thought to be bound to PsrC, is discussed

Keywords: methyl-menaquinone; polysul®de respiration; sulfur respiration; hydrogenase; formate dehydrogenase

Wolinella succinogenes grows at the expense of polysul®de

([S]) respiration with H2[reaction (a)] or formate [reaction

(b)] as electron donor [1±3] Reactions (a) (DGo¢ ˆ )31

kJámol Hÿ 1

2 ) and (b) (DGo¢ ˆ ) 30 kJ mol)1formate) are

coupled to the generation of an electrochemical proton

potential (Dp ˆ 0.17 V) across the bacterial membrane

which drives ATP synthesis [3±6]

H2+ [S] ® HS±+ H+ (a)

HCO2 + [S] ® CO2+ HS± (b)

It was proposed that the electron transport chain

catalyz-ing reactions (a) or (b) consisted of the membrane bound

components polysul®de reductase (Psr) and either

hydro-genase or formate dehydrohydro-genase [3,6±10] The catalytic

subunits of the three enzymes are oriented to the periplasmic

side of the membrane [4,6,10,11] The three enzymes were

isolated from the membrane fraction of W succinogenes

[3,6±8,12,13], and the corresponding genes were sequenced [9,12,14] Hydrogenase (Hyd) and formate dehydrogenase (Fdh) are identical with the enzymes involved in fumarate respiration with H2and formate in W succinogenes [7,8,15] The cytochrome b subunits of the two enzymes (HydC and FdhC) which carry the sites of quinone reduction are similar Their four histidine residues coordinating the two heme B groups are predicted to be located at similar places on three homologous membrane helices

Proteoliposomes containingPsr and either hydrogenase or formatedehydrogenasewerereportedtocatalyzereaction(a)

or (b) [4,6±8] The electron transport activities amounted to maximally 5% of those measured in the bacterial membrane fraction The activities were not higher in proteoliposomes additionally containing vitamin K1 which is known to substitute for menaquinone in fumarate respiration The isolated Psr was found to consist of the three subunits predicted by the psrABC operon [3,6,8] It contained molybdenum (1 mol per mol enzyme), molybdopterine guanine dinucleotide, free iron and sul®de, and menaqui-none Heme, ¯avin and other heavy metals were absent The enzyme catalyzed the reduction of polysul®de by BH4 [reaction (c)] and the oxidation of sul®de by 2,3-dimethyl-1,4-naphthoquinone (DMN) [reaction (d)]

BH4 + [S] ® BH3+ HS± (c)

HS±+ DMN + H+ ® [S] + DMNH2 (d) PsrA is similar to the catalytic subunits of several molybdo-oxidoreductases and is probably the catalytic subunit of Psr, which carries molybdenum coordinated by molybdopterin guanine dinucleotide PsrA and PsrB are predicted to carry one and four iron-sulfur-centers, respec-tively PsrC is a hydrophobic protein which anchors the enzyme in the membrane [10]

Correspondence to O Klimmek, Institut fuÈr Mikrobiologie, Johann

Wolfgang Goethe-UniversitaÈt, Marie-Curie-Str 9, D-60439 Frankfurt

am Main, Germany Fax: + 49 69 79829527,

Tel + 49 69 79829509, E-mail: klimmek@em.uni-frankfurt.de

Abbreviations: DMN, 2,3-dimethyl-1,4-naphthoquinone; Hyd,

hydrogenase; Fdh, formate dehydrogenase; MK, menaquinone; MK 6 ,

menaquinone with a side chain of six isoprene units; MM, 5- or

8-methyl-MK 6 ; MM b , MM bound to PsrC; MM b H ± , quinol anion of

MM bound to PsrC; Psr, polysul®de reductase; [S], sulfur atom in

polysul®de; TTFB,

4,5,6,7-tetrachloro-2-tri¯uoromethyl-benzimidazol;

Dp, electrochemical proton potential across a membrane; Dw, electric

term of Dp; Ttr, tetrathionate reductase.

(Received 25 June 2001, revised 1 November 2001, accepted

7 November 2001)

Trang 2

When the membrane fraction of W succinogenes was

fused to liposomes containing menaquinone isolated from

W succinogenes, the electron transport activities [reactions

(a) and (b)] decreased as a function of the degree of dilution

of the membrane proteins by phospholipid [6,16] This

effect was interpreted to indicate that the electron transfer

from the dehydrogenases to Psr requires diffusion and

collision of the enzyme molecules within the membrane

Consistent with this interpretation, the electron transport

activity with fumarate was not decreased upon dilution of

the membrane proteins In this case the electron transfer

from the dehydrogenases to fumarate reductase is

accom-plished by menaquinone (MK) whose diffusion velocity is

two orders of magnitude higher than that of the much

larger enzymes

When the membrane fraction was fused to liposomes

containing either no quinone or vitamin K1 instead of

menaquinone from W succinogenes, the activities of

poly-sul®de respiration decreased more markedly as the

phos-pholipid content increased [6,16] This suggested that one of

the two menaquinones of W succinogenes was speci®cally

required for polysul®de respiration and could not be

substituted by vitamin K1

Here we report on our attempts to restore polysul®de

respiration in liposomes using one of the menaquinones of

W succinogenes To elucidate the function of PsrC, which is

thought to bind quinone, certain amino-acid residues of this

subunit were replaced using site-directed mutagenesis The

resulting mutants were characterized by measuring their

speci®c activities of polysul®de respiration [reactions (a) and

(b)] and of Psr [reactions (c) and (d)] The mechanism of

polysul®de respiration is discussed in the light of the

experimental results

M A T E R I A L S A N D M E T H O D S

Growth ofW succinogenes

W succinogenes was grown with formate as electron donor

and either fumarate or nitrate as electron acceptor as

described previously [17,18] The medium containing nitrate

was supplemented with brain±heart infusion (1,3% w/v;

Gibco BRL) Kanamycin (25 mgáL)1) and chloramphenicol

(12,5 mgáL)1) were added to the medium when indicated

Cell fractionation

Cells of W succinogenes grown with fumarate were

sus-pended (10 g proteináL)1) in 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0 at

0 °C The suspension was passed through a French press at

130 Mpa and 10 mLámin)1¯ow The resulting cell

homo-genate was centrifuged for 40 min at 100 000 g to yield the

soluble cell fraction (supernatant) and the membrane

fraction The membrane fraction was resuspended in the

same buffer (10 g proteináL)1)

SDS/PAGE, Western blotting and ELISA

SDS/PAGE was carried out according to [19] Protein was

transferred to nitrocellulose sheets by electroblotting in a

discontinuous buffer system [20] PsrA was visualized by

indirect ELISA using the corresponding antiserum and goat

anti-(rabbit IgG) Ig conjugated to peroxidase [9]

Fusion particles and proteoliposomes Sonic liposomes containing quinone were prepared from a mixture of egg phospholipid (95%, w/w) [21] and phospha-tidylethanolamine (5%, Fluka; cat no 60650) as described previously [13,22] Fusion particles (see below) were pre-pared by freeze±thawing a mixture of sonic liposomes containing 5- or 8-methyl-MK6(MM) and bacterial mem-brane fraction [16] The fusion particles contained equal amounts of phospholipid from the liposomes and from the membrane fraction

Proteoliposomes were prepared by freeze-thawing sonic liposomes containing the quinone indicated (Table 1;

10 lmolág phospholipid)1) with Psr (or fumarate reductase) and either hydrogenase or formate dehydrogenase [8,13,22] Per g phospholipid, a total of 26 nmol Psr, 31 nmol fumarate reductase, 178 nmol hydrogenase and 89 nmol formate dehydrogenase were applied

Quinones

MK6and MM were extracted from the membrane fraction

of W succinogenes grown with fumarate using a mixture of petrol ether and methanol The quinones in the extract were separated by HPLC according to [23] The quinones were quanti®ed by HPLC using vitamin K1as the standard MK4 (Sigma; cat no V-9378) and vitamin K1 (Fluka; cat no 95271) are commercially available

Activities of Psr and of polysul®de respiration The activity of Psr was measured at 37 °C by photometric recording of polysul®de reduction with BH4 [24] or by photometric recording of DMN reduction with sul®de [2] Polysul®de respiration with H2or formate (electron trans-port) was recorded photometrically at 37 °C as described previously [2,8,16] The unit of activity (U) corresponded to consumption of 1 lmol substrate per min

Protein Protein was determined after precipitation with trichloro-acetic acid using the Biuret method with KCN [25]

Table 1 Activities of polysul®de respiration of proteoliposomes con-taining di€erent naphthoquinones Polysul®de respiration with H 2

(H 2 ® [S]) or with formate (HCO 2 ® [S]) was measured in prote-oliposomes containing Psr and either hydrogenase or formate dehydrogenase isolated from W succinogenes Fumarate respiration with formate (HCO 2 ® fumarate) was measured in proteoliposomes containing fumarate reductase and formate dehydrogenase as described previously [22] The activities are given as substrate turnovers

of Psr or fumarate reductase at 37 °C All values are in units of s )1 Quinone H 2 ® [S] HCO 2 ® [S] HCO 2 ® fumarate

Methyl-MK 6 (MM) 370 175 35

VitK 1 25 5 1180

Trang 3

Genetic techniques

Standard genetic procedures were used essentially

according to [26] DNA was isolated from W

succino-genes with the DNeasy Tissue Kit from Qiagen PCR

was carried out using the Expand High Fidelity

PCR System (Roche) or the Expand Long Template

PCR System (Roche) with standard ampli®cation

proto-cols and a Hybaid Omnigene Thermocycler (MWG

Biotech) Southern blotting to nylon membranes was

performed as described previously [27] DNA probes

were generated with the PCR DIG Probe Synthesis Kit

(Roche), and hybrids were visualized using the DIG/

Luminescent Detection Kit (Roche)

Construction ofW succinogenes KpsrC

Mutant KpsrC was constructed by integrating plasmid

pKpsrC into the genome of mutant DpsrC [10] (Fig 1)

Plasmid pKpsrC was constructed from pT7-6 [28] by

inserting the catGC gene excised from pDF4a [29] using

BamHI restriction The orientation of catGCwas con®rmed

by restriction analysis Subsequently, a fragment comprising

most of psrB (521 bp), psrC, and 60 bp of the 3¢ end of rhpR

was inserted using HindIII and XbaI This fragment was

synthesized from genomic DNA by PCR with primers

carrying at their 5¢ ends suitable restriction sites for cloning

The identity of the cloned PCR fragment was con®rmed by

sequencing

Cells of W succinogenes DpsrC were transformed with

the plasmid as described previously [30] Transformants

were selected on agar plates containing the nitrate

medium, 2.6% (w/v) brain-heart-infusion agar (Gibco

BRL) and chloramphenicol (12.5 mgáL)1) The genome

of several transformants was checked for the presence of

the catGCand the psrC gene by means of Southern blot

analysis using BglII restriction (Fig 1) As expected, only

one BglII fragment (9.7 kbp) of mutant KpsrC

hybridized to the catGC and the psrC probe The

in-frame integration of the plasmid was con®rmed by

sequencing

Construction ofW succinogenes psrC mutants The psrC mutants of W succinogenes (see Table 2) were constructed by transforming W succinogenes DpsrC with derivatives of pKpsrC The derivatives were synthesized using the Quick Change site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) with pKpsrC as template and speci®cally synthesized oligonucleotides carrying the desired nucleotide mismatches Modi®ed pKpsrC plasmids were sequenced to con®rm the mutations Transformation of W succinogenes DpsrC with modi®ed plasmids and selection of transfor-mants was performed as described above

Computer analysis Database searches made use of the program BLAST [31] Search for membrane-spanning helices was performed using theTMPREDprogram [32] Multiple sequences were aligned using the programCLUSTALW[33]

R E S U L T S

Reconstitution of polysul®de respiration

W succinogenes grown with polysul®de or with fumarate catalyzes polysul®de respiration [reactions (a) and (b)] as well as fumarate respiration with H2or formate [16] These bacteria contain equal amounts (approximately 3 lmol per

g phospholipid) of MK6and of MM [34] The methyl group

in the aromatic ring of MM is at position 5 or 8 Like MK,

MM appears to be dissolved in the lipid phase of the membrane and is not tightly bound to membrane proteins Both quinones can be extracted from the membrane with a mixture of petrol ether and methanol

In the experiment shown in Table 1, Psr and either hydrogenase or formate dehydrogenase were incorporated into liposomes containing one of the quinones indicated (10 lmolág phospholipid)1) The activities of polysul®de respiration of proteoliposomes containing MM were more than an order of magnitude greater than of those prepared with MK6, MK4, vitamin K1, or without quinone These

Fig 1 Physical map of the psr locus of W succinogenes DpsrC and KpsrC Mutant KpsrC was obtained by integration of pKpsrC into the genome

of the DpsrC mutant.

Trang 4

Table 2 Properties of psrC mutants grown with formate and fumarate The presence of PsrA was tested by Western blot and ELISA The speci®c activities of Psr (BH 4 ® [S] and HS ± ® DMN) and of polysul®de respiration (H 2 ® [S] and HCO 2 ® [S]) refer to total cellular protein (cells)

or to the protein of the membrane fraction (MF).

Strain Preparation PsrApresent

Uámg protein )1

BH 4 ® [S] HS ± ® DMN H 2 ® [S] HCO 2 ® [S]

a The cell homogenate was used.

Trang 5

low activities were probably due to the low level of MM

present in the enzyme preparations used for preparing the

proteoliposomes Proteoliposomes prepared with fumarate

reductase and formate dehydrogenase catalyzed fumarate

respiration with formate at high activities, if MK6, MK4or

vitamin K1were also incorporated However, if MM was

incorporated instead, the activity was as low as that of

proteoliposomes prepared without added quinone In

liposomes containing fumarate reductase and hydrogenase,

fumarate respiration with H2was restored by MK6, MK4or

vitamin K1but not by MM (data not shown)

The turnover number of Psr in polysul®de respiration

with formate in the proteoliposomes is close to that

measured in the membrane fraction of wild-type W

suc-cinogenes (see Table 2) which contains approximately

0.1 lmol Psr per g membrane protein [3,8] The turnover

number with H2is 50% higher in the proteoliposomes than

in the membrane fraction This higher activity is probably

due to the higher amount of hydrogenase relative to Psr in

the proteoliposomes In summary, functional electron

transport chains catalyzing reactions (a) or (b) at the

expected activities can be restored from the isolated enzymes

and MM Hence no further components appear to be

required for the electron transport MM is speci®cally

involved in polysul®de respiration and cannot be substituted

by MK6although this is also present in the membrane of

W succinogenes

In the experiment shown in Fig 2, the membrane fraction

of W succinogenes was fused with sonic liposomes

contain-ing increascontain-ing amounts of MM The six different

prepara-tions so obtained contained equal amounts of phospholipids

from the membrane fraction and from the liposomes The

activity of polysul®de respiration with H2increased

hyper-bolically with the amount of MM The activity was 50 and

80% of the maximum activity with 2.5 and 10 lmol MM

per g phospholipid, respectively Thus the activity is

considerably enhanced by the incorporation of additional

MM into the membrane fraction which normally contains

approximately 3 lmol MM per g phospholipid As noted

in the Discussion section, the titration curve (Fig 2)

may re¯ect binding of reduced MM to PsrC If this

assumption is valid, the dissociation constant would be 2.5 lmol MMág phospholipid)1

The effect of Dp on the electron transport activity The speci®c activities of Psr in the membrane fraction are about twice those found in cells of W succinogenes (see Table 2) This is consistent with the location of Psr in the membrane which contains half of the total cellular protein

In contrast, the speci®c activities of polysul®de respiration are higher in cells than in the membrane fraction (see Table 2) This is probably due to the Dp generated across the membrane of cells by polysul®de respiration [5] The Dp

is lost upon cell disruption The addition of a protonophore

to cells also caused inhibition of polysul®de respiration (Fig 3) The protonophore 4,5,6,7-tetrachloro-2-tri¯uoro-methylbenzimidazol (TTFB) which is known to dissipate the Dp [5,35] was found to cause up to 70% inhibition of polysul®de respiration in cells Polysul®de respiration in the membrane fraction or fumarate respiration in cells or in the membrane fraction were not inhibited by TTFB (not shown) Thus, the activity of polysul®de respiration appears

to be stimulated by Dp

Characterization of psrC mutants PsrC is predicted to form eight membrane-spanning helices and to be similar to four hydrophobic subunits of other electron transport enzymes which are likely to react with quinones (Fig 4) The nrfD genes of E coli and Haemophilus in¯uenzae are constituents of gene clusters encoding Ôcytochrome c nitrite reductaseÕ NrfA of E coli is known to be the catalytic subunit of this enzyme [37] The gene product of nrfD was proposed to encode the membrane anchor of the enzyme and to carry the site of quinol oxidation Tetrathionate reductase (Ttr) of Salmonella typhimurium is thought to catalyze the reduction of

Fig 2 Activity of polysul®de respiration with H 2 as a function of the

MM content of fusion particles The maximum activity was assumed to

be measured with 57 lmol MMág phospholipid -1

Fig 3 The e€ect of the protonophore TTFB on the activities of poly-sul®de respiration in cells of W succinogenes TTFB dissolved in demethylsulfoxide was added 3 min before the electron transport was started The speci®c activity of polysul®de respiration with H 2 and formate was 3.6 and 0.72 Uámg )1 cell protein, respectively at 37°C.

Trang 6

tetrathionate to thiosulfate by a quinol [39] The catalytic

subunit (TtrA) is predicted to carry molybdenum and an

iron±sulfur center TtrB is predicted to harbour four iron±

sulfur centers TtrC was proposed to anchor the enzyme in

the membrane and to carry the quinol site TtrC is larger

than PsrC and probably contains an additional

hydropho-bic helix at its C-terminus A molybdo-iron±sulfur enzyme

which is similar to Psr and tetrathionate reductase is possibly

encoded by a gene cluster of Archaeoglobus fulgidus This

cluster includes orf 2386 which is predicted to code for a

hydrophobic protein resembling PsrC The majority of

residues conserved among the ®ve proteins are located in the

hydrophobic stretches or close to them Conserved residues

that may be essential for electron or proton transfer are

presented in highlighted letters in Fig 4 The corresponding

residues of PsrC were replaced by other residues, and the

resulting mutants were characterized (Table 2)

The psrC mutants were constructed from a mutant

(DpsrC) of W succinogenes carrying the kan gene instead of

psrC (Fig 1) Cells of this mutant grown with fumarate did

not catalyze polysul®de respiration with H2or formate, in

contrast to the wild-type strain (Table 2) PsrA and the

enzymic activities of Psr [reactions (c) and (d)] were found in

cells of the mutant, but were missing in the membrane

fraction PsrA and the activity of reaction (d) were

previously found to be located in the periplasmic cell

fraction of mutant DpsrC [10] Integration of plasmid

pKpsrC into the genome of DpsrC resulted in strain KpsrC

which carried the intact psrABC operon including psrC

(Fig 1) This strain had wild-type activities of polysul®de

respiration with H2and with formate As with the wild-type

strain, PsrA and the activities of Psr were found in the

membrane fraction of strain KpsrC These results show that

PsrC anchors Psr in the membrane and is required for

polysul®de respiration, but not for the Psr activities

The other psrC mutants listed in Table 2 were construc-ted by integrating derivatives of pKpsrC with altered codons into the genome of the DpsrC mutant All the mutants so obtained had PsrA bound to the membrane, and the speci®c activities of Psr were similar to those of the wild-type strain Hence, the integration of Psr into the membrane and its enzymic activities were not affected by the mutations The mutants differ in their speci®c activities of polysul®de respiration Eight of the 23 mutants either did not catalyze polysul®de respiration or their speci®c activities were less than 5% of those of the wild-type strain In these mutants a residue was altered which is presumably located in one of the eight hydrophobic segments of PsrC (Y23F, Y159F, E225Q, R305F and R305K) or next to their ends (D76N, D76L, and D218N) The replacement of another three residues located in hydrophobic stretches of PsrC had less drastic effects; the activities of T160V, S185A and S188A amounted to approximately 10, 50 and 25%, respectively, of those of the wild-type strain Substitution of Y106, E146, S192 and of W261 which are located in hydrophobic stretches had no effect on the electron transport activities Wild-type activities were also measured with mutants W16F, H82A, S94A, N174D, E209Q, and Y310F These residues are predicted to be located in the hydrophilic loops

of PsrC In summary, the properties of the mutants (Table 2) suggest that certain residues of PsrC are essential for electron transfer from the dehydrogenases to polysul®de, indicating that PsrC serves speci®c functions in addition to that of the membrane anchor of Psr

The activity of polysul®de respiration in the membrane fraction of the wild-type strain was found to be considerably enhanced by increasing the amount of MM (Fig 2) Therefore, it was feasible that higher amounts of MM would restore the electron transport in the mutants lacking this activity To test this possibility, the membrane fraction

Fig 4 Sequence alignment of PsrC of W succinogenes (W s.) to four proteins predicted from DNA sequences Residues which were replaced in PsrC

by site-directed mutagenesis are highlighted These residues are shown in white on black background, if the corresponding mutants showed 5% or less of the wild-type activities of polysul®de respiration (Table 2) Putative membrane spanning segments are boxed A f., Archaeoglobus fulgidus [36]; E c., Escherichia coli [37]; H i., Haemophilus in¯uenzae [38]; S t., Salmonella typhimurium [39].

Trang 7

of these mutants (Y23F, Y159F, D218N, E225Q, R305F

and R305K) was fused to liposomes containing high

concentrations of MM as in the experiment shown in

Fig 2 Electron transport activity was not restored in these

fusion particles which contained 20-fold the amount of MM

present in the membrane fraction (not shown) This suggests

that the lack of electron transport activity was not caused by

a decreased af®nity of the putative MM binding site for

MM However, a stimulation would not be seen if this

af®nity in the mutants was decreased by more than two

orders of magnitude With mutants showing partial

inhibi-tion of the electron transport, this activity was either

stimulated (E225D) or was not signi®cantly altered (S185A,

S188A) by the increased quinone content

D I S C U S S I O N

The function of MM

The standard redox potential of MK in organic solution at

pH 7 (Eo¢) was determined to be )74 mV [40,41] A methyl

group in the aromatic ring of napthoquinones was found to

lower the Eo¢ by approximately 16 mV [41] Therefore, the

Eo¢ of MM in organic solution is assumed to be )90 mV

[reaction (2) in Table 3] The same value is likely to apply for

MM in the bacterial membrane, as the Eo¢ of MK in a

bacterial membrane was determined to be close to that in

organic solution [43] It will be shown below that MMH2

dissolved in the membrane is not suf®ciently

electro-negative to serve as donor for polysul®de reduction

Tetrasul®de (S2ÿ

4 ) and pentasul®de (S2ÿ

5 ) are the only polysul®de species occurring at signi®cant concentrations in

the solutions (10)2 M HS±, pH 8) used for measuring

polysul®de respiration [44] The concentration of

pentasul-®de is about half that of tetrasulpentasul-®de The redox potential of

tetrasul®de [reaction (4) in Table 3] was evaluated from that

of elemental sulfur [reaction (3) in Table 3] using the

equilibrium constant of reaction (e) (3.6 ´ 10)9 M; [2,44])

3/8 S8+ HS± ® S2ÿ

4 + H+ (e) The standard potential of tetrasul®de at pH 8 [reaction

(4) in Table 3] turns out to be nearly equal to that of

elemental sulfur; this also holds true for pentasul®de These

potentials are approximately 150 mV more negative than

that of MM [reaction (2) in Table 3]

As a consequence, the reduction of polysul®de by MMH2

[reaction (f)] is extremely endergonic From the equilibrium

constant at pH 8 of reaction (f) [5 ´ 10)16 M3, from

reactions (2) and (4) in Table 3] it is calculated that the

reaction becomes exergonic when the ratio MM : MMH2

exceeds 2 ´ 10)4with the concentrations of tetrasul®de and sul®de at 10)4 Mand 10)2 M, respectively

3MMH2+ S2ÿ

4 ® 3MM + 4HS±+ 2H+ (f) The ratio corresponds to a concentration of MM within the membrane (0.6 ´ 10)6 M) which is more than an order

of magnitude below the Km of hydrogenase for DMN (15 ´ 10)6 M) The Kmfor this water soluble menaquinone analogue is thought to re¯ect those for the quinones within the membrane on the basis that the content of 3 lmol qui-noneág phospholipid)1corresponds to 3 ´ 10)3 Mquinone concentration If MM/MMH2 was a component of the electron transport chain catalyzing polysul®de reduction

by H2, the steady state concentration of MM would be below 0.6 ´ 10)6 M The corresponding velocity of MM reduction by H2 would be much lower than that of the overall electron transport from H2 to polysul®de There-fore, the species of MM involved in polysul®de respiration should have a much lower redox potential than that of

MM dissolved in the membrane The redox potential at

pH 8 of the species involved in polysul®de respiration can

be estimated assuming its equilibrium ratio oxidized/ reduced to be 1 (instead of 2 ´ 10)4) and the equilibrium concentrations of S2ÿ

4 (10)4 M) and HS± (10)2 M) used above The value so obtained [EpH8

o ˆ )260 mV, reaction (5) in Table 3] is regarded as the upper limit of redox potential of the quinol suited as donor of polysul®de reduction

Hypothetical mechanism of polysul®de respiration

It is envisaged that the species of MM serving in polysul®de respiration is bound to PsrC in its oxidized (MMb) and its reduced form (MMbH±) which is the quinol anion MMbis thought to be reduced to MMbH± by accepting electrons from the cytochrome b subunit (HydC) of hydrogenase (or FdhC of formate dehydrogenase) upon collision with PsrC (Fig 5) MMbreduction is assumed to be coupled to proton uptake from the cytoplasmic side of the membrane, and

MMbH±oxidation to be coupled to proton release at the periplasmic side MMb and MMbH± are thought to be located in the hydrophobic part of PsrC Therefore, the uptake and release of protons is expected to be guided by proton channels The channel for proton release should be

in PsrC and that for proton uptake in HydC The H+/e ratio of 0.5 predicted by the mechanism is half that determined for fumarate respiration of W succinogenes, in agreement with the growth yields of polysul®de and fumarate respiration [2,3,6]

The EpH8

o of MMb/MMbH±is assumed to be )260 mV [reaction (5) in Table 3] Using this value, the free energy (DGpH8

o ) of MMbreduction by H2and of MMbH±oxidation

by polysul®de is calculated (Table 4, Dw ˆ 0) The free energy values are expected to be altered by the

Dw ˆ 170 mV across the membrane of growing cells Assuming MMband MMbH± to be located in the center

of the membrane, each electron derived from H2 would become 85 mV more electropositive on its way from the periplasmic side to MMb(Fig 5) The simultaneous transfer

of a proton from the cytoplasmic side to MMbshould affect the free energy of MMbreduction by H2in the same way Thus MMb reduction by H2 should become 24 kJámol)1 more endergonic, as two electrons (derived from H2) from

Table 3 Redox potentials of compounds involved in polysul®de

respi-ration with H 2 E o ¢ of reaction (3) was taken from [42] The values of

reactions (2), (4), and (5) are derived as described in the text.

E o ¢ (mV) E pH8

o

(1) H 2 ® 2H + + 2e ± )420 )480

(2) MMH 2 ® MM + 2H + + 2e ± )90 )150

(3) HS ± ® 1/8 S 8 + H + + 2e ± )275 )305

(4) 4HS ± ® S + 4H + + 6e ± )260 -300

(5) MM b H ± ® MM b + H + + 2e ± )230 )260

Trang 8

the periplasmic (positive) side and one proton from the

cytoplasmic side are transferred to MMb MMbH±

oxida-tion should become 8 kJámol)1 more exergonic, as it is

coupled to the transfer of two electrons and one proton

from the center of the membrane to the periplasmic side

The free energy conserved in the Dp generated by polysul®de

respiration is given by the difference in DGpH8

o of polysul®de reduction by H2in the absence and in the presence of the Dw (16 kJámol Hÿ1

2 ), and is exclusively conserved from MMb reduction by H2(Table 4) This value is consistent with the formation of 0.33 mol ATP per mol H2at a phosphoryla-tion potential of 44 kJámol ATP)1 [45] This ATP yield would be half that of fumarate respiration, in agreement with the growth yields [2,3,6]

The effect of Dp on electron transport activity The effect of Dp on the activity of electron transport (Fig 3) can be explained if it is assumed that the activity of polysul®de respiration in the membrane fraction is limited

by the amount of MMbH±in the absence of a Dp, and that

MMbH±dissociates from PsrC (C) according to reaction (g), where H‡

i designates a proton taken up from or released to the cytoplasmic side of the membrane

MMbH±+ H‡

i ® MMH2+ C (g) Assuming that MMbH± is located in the center of the membrane, its amount should be increased by a Dp across the membrane according to reaction (g), whose velocity could be lower than the activity of polysul®de respiration The view that polysul®de respiration is limited by the amount of MMbH±in the membrane fraction in the absence

of a Dp is supported by the experiment shown in Fig 2

In this experiment, polysul®de respiration was stimulated

Fig 5 Hypothetical mechanism of polysul®de respiration with H 2

MM b , MM bound to PsrC; MM b H ± , hydroquinone anion of MM

bound to PsrC The dotted and the striped areas designate Hyd and

Psr, respectively Hyd catalyses the reduction of MM b by H 2 , probably

at one of the hemes This reaction is coupled to the uptake of a proton

from the cytoplasm Psr catalyses the oxidation of MM b H ± by [S]

which is coupled to the release of a proton to the periplasm.

Table 4 Standard free energies at pH 8 of the reactions thought to make

up polysul®de respiration with H 2 MM b and MM b H ± designate MM bound to PsrC in the oxidized and reduced state (Fig 4) [S] designates polysul®de sulfur DG pH8

o values were calculated from the E pH8

o of reactions 1, 4, and 5 given in Table 3 Dw Designates the electrical potential across the membrane which is generated by polysul®de respiration [3,5].

DG pH8

o (kJá mol )1 )

Dw ˆ 0 mV Dw ˆ 170 mV

H 2 + MM b ® MM b H ± + H + )43 )19

MM b H ± + [S] ® MM b + HS ± +8 0 Total: H 2 + [S] ® HS ) + H + )35 )19

Fig 6 Hypothetical topology of PsrC

Resi-dues replaced in PsrC by site-directed

muta-genesis are indicated Residues in bold letters

correspond to mutants with 5% or less of the

wild-type speci®c activities of polysul®de

res-piration.

Trang 9

nearly two-fold upon the incorporation of additional MM.

As the MM dissolved in the membrane is likely to be fully

reduced in the steady state of polysul®de respiration, the

amount of MMbH±should increase according to reaction

(g) as increasing amounts of MM are incorporated into the

membrane On the basis of these considerations, the

titration curve (Fig 2) re¯ects the formation of MMbH±

according to reaction (g)

The function of PsrC

Like the iron-sulfur subunit of fumarate reductase [46], PsrB

is thought to serve as mediator of electron transfer between

the prosthetic group (MMb) of the membrane anchor

(PsrC) and the catalytic subunit (PsrA) of Psr Therefore,

PsrA is probably bound to PsrB which in turn is bound to

PsrC on the periplasmic side of the membrane Dissociation

of PsrA from the membrane was not observed in any of the

psrC mutants listed in Table 2 (mutant DpsrC excepted)

The activities of Psr are not impaired in the mutants listed

in Table 2 This also refers to the mutants lacking at least

95% of the activities of polysul®de respiration The residues

substituted in these mutants (in bold type in Fig 6) are

either charged at neutral pH or are tyrosines, the phenolic

hydroxyl groups of which appear to be essential for

polysul®de respiration The function of these residues may

be explained on the basis of the hypothetical mechanism

depicted in Fig 5 R305 is well suited for binding and

stabilizing the postulated quinol anion of MM (MMbH±)

which is thought to be bound to PsrC in a hydrophobic

environment The mere positive charge of R305 is

appar-ently not suf®cient for its function, as the smaller lysine

residue did not substitute for R305 D218 and E225 may

serve in guiding the proton formed by the oxidation of

MMbH±to the periplasmic side of the membrane

Consis-tent with this function, the negative charge of E225 appears

to be essential, as mutant E225Q was nearly inactive, while

E225D showed more than 25% of the wild-type activity

D76 as well as Y23 and Y159 may possibly involved in the

proton transfer to and from the cytoplasmic side according

to reaction (g) which describes the binding of reduced MM

to PsrC and its dissociation Consistent with this function,

substitution of D76 by asparagine or leucine resulted in

nearly inactive mutants, whereas D76H exhibited about

10% of the wild-type activity of polysul®de respiration The

hydroxyl groups of Y23 and Y159 may form hydrogen

bounds to MMband MMbH±

W succinogenes mutants with one of the four heme

ligands of HydC replaced were found to lack the activities of

electron transport form H2to polysul®de and to fumarate

[15] The heme groups appear to be required for the

reduction of MMband of MK However, it is not known

whether the two quinones are reduced at the same site of

Hyd C Assuming that there is only one site for quinone

reduction on HydC (or FdhC), it has to be postulated that

MMbprotrudes from its binding site on PsrC into the lipid

phase of the membrane to accept electrons form the heme

group(s) together with a proton as depicted in Fig 5

Alternatively, MMH2 transiently bound to the

cyto-chrome b might transfer a hydride to MMb Consistent

with the latter mechanism, hydrogenase was found to

catalyze MM reduction by H2 which is coupled to the

generation of a Dw across the membrane of liposomes

containing hydrogenase (S Biel, J Simon & R Gross, Institut fuÈr Mikrobiologie, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-UniversitaÈt Frankfurt-am-Main, personal communication)

In fumarate respiration, MK may be reduced at the same site on HydC In this case, the resulting MKH2would be free to diffuse to fumarate reductase

A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T S The authors are indebted to A KroÈger for helpful discussion and to O SchuÈrmann for skilful technical assistance The work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 472).

R E F E R E N C E S

1 Macy, J.M., SchroÈder, I., Thauer, R.K., KroÈger, A (1986) Growth of Wolinella succinogenes on H 2 S plus fumarate and

on formate plus sulfur as energy sources Arch Microbiol 144, 147±150.

2 Klimmek, O., KroÈger, A., Steudel, R., Holdt, G (1991) Growth of Wolinella succinogenes with polysul®de as terminal acceptor of phosphorylative electron transport Arch Microbiol 155, 177±182.

3 Klimmek, O (1996) Aufbau und Funktion der Polysul®d-Reduktase von Wolinella succinogenes PhD Thesis, University of Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

4 Schauder, R & KroÈger, A (1993) Bacterial sulphur respiration Arch Microbiol 159, 491±497.

5 Wloczyk, C., KroÈger, A., GoÈbel, T., Holdt, G., Steudel, R (1989) The electrochemical proton potential generated by the sulphur respiration of Wolinella succinogenes Arch Microbiol 152, 600±605.

6 Hedderich, R., Klimmek, O., KroÈger, A., Dirmeier, R., Keller, M., Stetter, K.O (1999) Anaerobic respiration with sulfur and with organic disul®des FEMS Microbiol Rev 22, 353±381.

7 SchroÈder, I., KroÈger, A., Macy, J.M (1988) Isolation of the sul-phur reductase and reconstitution of the sulsul-phur respiration of Wolinella succinogenes Arch Microbiol 149, 572±579.

8 Fauque, G., Klimmek, O., KroÈger, A (1994) Sulfur reductases from mesophilic sulfur-reducing eubacteria Methods Enzymol.

243, 367±383.

9 Kra€t, T., Bokranz, M., Klimmek, O., SchroÈder, I., Fahrenholz, F., Kojro, E., KroÈger, A (1992) Cloning and nucleotide sequence

of the psrA gene of Wolinella succinogenes polysulphide reductase Eur J Biochem 206, 503±510.

10 Kra€t, T., Grỏ, R., KroÈger, A (1995) The function of Wolinella succinogenes psr genes in electron transport with polysulphide as the terminal acceptor Eur J Biochem 230, 601±606.

11 Gross, R., Simon, J., Theis, F., KroÈger, A (1998) Two membrane anchors of Wolinella succinogenes hydrogenase and their function

in fumarate and polysul®de respiration Arch Microbiol 170, 50±58.

12 Dross, F., Geisler, V., Lenger, R., Theis, F., Kra€t, T., Fahrenholz, F., Kojro, E., DucheÃne, A., Tripier, D., Juvenal, K., KroÈger, A (1992) The quinone-reactive Ni/Fe-hydrogenase of Wolinella succinogenes Eur J Biochem 206, 93±102.

13 Unden, G & KroÈger, A (1982) Reconstitution in liposomes of the electron transport chain catalyzing fumarate reduction by for-mate Biochim Biophys Acta 682, 258±263.

14 Bokranz, M., Gutmann, M., KoÈrtner, C., Kojro, E., Fahrenholz, F., Lauterbach, F., KroÈger, A (1991) Cloning and nucleotide sequence of the structural genes encoding the formate dehydro-genase of Wolinella succinogenes Arch Microbiol 156, 119±128.

15 Gross, R., Simon, J., Lancaster, C.R.D., KroÈger, A (1998) Identi®cation of histidine residues in Wolinella succinogenes hydrogenase that are essential for menaquinone reduction by H 2 Mol Microbiol 30, 639±646.

Trang 10

16 Jankielewicz, A., Klimmek, O., KroÈger, A (1995) The electron

transfer from hydrogenase and formate dehydrogenase to

poly-sul®de reductase in the membrane of Wolinella succinogenes.

Biochim Biophys Acta 1231, 157±162.

17 KroÈger, A., Geisler, V., DucheÃne, A (1994) Isolation of Wolinella

succinogenes hydrogenase, chromatofocusing In A Practical Guide

to Membrane Protein Puri®cation (von Jagow, G & SchaÈgger, H.,

eds), pp 141±147 Academic Press, London.

18 Lorenzen, J.P., KroÈger, A., Unden, G (1993) Regulation of

anaerobic respiratory pathways in Wolinella succinogenes by the

presence of electron acceptors Arch Microbiol 159, 477±483.

19 Laemmli, U.K (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the

assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4 Nature 227, 680±685.

20 Kyhse-Andersen, J (1984) Electroblotting of multiple gels: a

simple apparatus without bu€er tank for rapid transfer of proteins

form polyacrylamide to nitrocellulose J Biochem Biophys.

Methods 10, 203±209.

21 Singleton, W.S., Gray, M.S., Brown, M.L., White, J.L (1965)

Chromato-graphically homogeneous lecithin from egg

phospho-lipids J Am Oil Chem Soc 42, 53±56.

22 Unden, G & KroÈger, A (1986) Reconstitution of a functional

electron transport chain form puri®ed formate dehydrogenase and

fumarate reductase complexes Methods Enzymol 126, 387±399.

23 Unden, G (1988) Di€erential roles for menaquinone and

dem-ethyl-menaquinone in anaerobic electron transport of E coli and

their fnr-dependent expression Arch Microbiol 150, 499±503.

24 Klimmek, O., Kreis, V., Klein, C., Simon, J., Wittershagen, A.,

KroÈger, A (1998) The function of the periplasmic Sud protein in

polysul®de respiration of Wolinella succinogenes Eur J Biochem.

253, 263±269.

25 Bode, Ch, Goebell, H., StaÈhler, E (1968) Zur Eliminierung von

TruÈbungsfehlern bei der Eiweiûbestimmung mit der

Biuretmeth-ode Z Klin Chem U Klin Biochem 6, 418±422.

26 Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F., Maniatis, T (1989) Molecular

Clon-ing A Laboratory Manual Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press,

Cold Spring Harbor, New York.

27 Lenger, R., Herrmann, U., Gross, R., Simon, J., KroÈger, A (1997)

Structure and function of a second gene cluster encoding the

formate dehydrogenase of Wolinella succinogenes Eur J

Bio-chem 246, 646±651.

28 Tabor, S (1990) Expression using the T7 RNA

polymerase/pro-moter system In Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Ausubel,

F.A., Brent, R., Kingston, R.E., Moore, D.D., Seidman, J.G.,

Smith, J.A & Struhl, K., eds), pp 16.2.1±16.2.11 Greene

Pub-lishing and Wiley Interscience, New York.

29 Haas, R., Kahrs, A.F., Facius, D., Allmeier, H., Schmitt, R.,

Meyer, T.F (1993) TnMax ± a versatile mini-transposon for the

analysis of cloned genes and shuttle mutagenesis Gene 130, 23±31.

30 Simon, J., Gross, R., Ringel, M., Schmidt, E., KroÈger, A (1998)

Deletion and site-directed mutagenesis of the Wolinella

succino-genes fumarate reductase operon Eur J Biochem 251, 418±426.

31 Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W., Lipman,

D.J (1990) Basic local alignment search tool J Mol Biol 215,

403±410.

32 Hofmann, K & Sto€el, W (1993) Tmbase ± a database of membrane-spanning protein segments Biol Chem Hoppe-Seyler

374, 166.

33 Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., Gibson, T.J (1994) CLU-STALW: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-speci®c gap penalties and weight matrix choice Nucleic Acids Res 22, 4673±4680.

34 Collins, M.D & Fernandez, F (1984) Menaquinone-6 and thermoplasma-quinone-6 in Wolinella succinogenes FEMS Microbiol Lett 22, 273±276.

35 Mell, H., Wellnitz, C., KroÈger, A (1986) The electrochemical proton potential and the proton/electron ratio of the electron transport with fumarate in Wolinella succinogenes Biochim Bio-phys Acta 852, 212±221.

36 Klenk, H.-P., Clayton, R.A., Tomb, J.-F., White, O., Nelson, K.E., Ketchum, K.A., Dodson, R.J., Gwinn, M., Hickey, E.K., Peterson, J.D et al (1997) The complete genome sequence of the hyperthermophilic, sulphate-reducing archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus Nature 390, 364±370.

37 Hussain, H., Grove, J., Griths, L., Busby, S., Cole, J (1994)

A seven-gene operon essential for formate-dependent nitrite reduction to ammonia by enteric bacteria Mol Microbiol 12, 153±163.

38 Fleischmann, R.D., Adams, M.D., White, O., Clayton, R.A., Kirkness, E.F., Kerlavage, A.R., Bult, C.J., Tomb, J.F., Dougherty, B.A., Merrick, J.M (1995) Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus in¯uenzae Rd Science

269, 496±512.

39 Hensel, M., Hinsley, A.P., Nikolaus, T., Sawers, G., Berks, B.C (1999) The genetic basis of tetrathionate respiration in Salmonella typhimurium Mol Microbiol 32, 275±287.

40 Schnorf, U (1966) Der Ein¯uû von Substituenten auf Redox-potential und Wuchseigenschaften von Chinonen PhD Disserta-tion no 3871, ETH, ZuÈrich.

41 Clark, W.M (1960) Oxidation±Reduction Potentials of Organic Systems Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.

42 Thauer, R., Jungermann, K., Decker, K (1977) Energy conser-vation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria Bacteriol Rev 41, 100±180.

43 Liebl, U., Pezennec, S., Riedel, A., Kellner, E., Nitschke, W (1992) The Rieske FeS center from the gram-positive bacterium PS3 and its interaction with the menaquinone pool studied by EPR J Biol Chem 20, 14068±14072.

44 Giggenbach, W (1972) Optical spectra and equilibrium distribu-tion of polysul®de ions in aqueous soludistribu-tion at 20° Inorg Chem.

11, 1201±1207.

45 KroÈger, A & Winkler, E (1981) Phosphorylative fumarate reduction in Vibrio succinogenes: stoichiometry of ATP synthesis Arch Microbiol 129, 100±104.

46 Lancaster, C.R.D., KroÈger, A., Auer, M., Michel, H (1999) Structure of fumarate reductase from Wolinella succinogenes at 2.2 AÊ resolution Nature 402, 377±387.

Ngày đăng: 24/03/2014, 03:21

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm