Production of transgenic deepwater indica rice plants expressingresistance to yellow stem borer Mohammad Firoz Alam, Karabi Datta, Editha Abrigo, Alelie Vasquez, Dharmawansa Senadhira, S
Trang 1Production of transgenic deepwater indica rice plants expressing
resistance to yellow stem borer
Mohammad Firoz Alam, Karabi Datta, Editha Abrigo, Alelie Vasquez,
Dharmawansa Senadhira, Swapan K Datta *
Plant Breeding, Genetics and Biochemistry Di 6ision, International Rice Research Institute, P.O Box933, Manila,1099, Philippines
Received 14 October 1997; received in revised form 17 December 1997; accepted 23 February 1998
Abstract
Yellow stem borer has been identified as a major insect pest of deepwater rice, causing severe yield losses Bt gene(s) from Bacillus thuringiensis have been proven very effective in pest resistance program The use of transgenic plants expressing Bt gene(s) is now occupied effective approach to control insect infestation We have successfully introduced
a synthetic cryIA(b) gene into embryogenic calli of a deepwater indica rice variety, Vaidehi, by using the biolistic method of transformation The presence and expression of the Bt gene in regenerated plants were confirmed by
Southern and Western blot analyses Inheritance of the transgene was confirmed in the T1generation Insect bioassays showed an enhancement of resistance against the yellow stem borer This is the first report of lowland rice, engineered
with Bt gene © 1998 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd All rights reserved.
Keywords : Transgenic deepwater rice; cryIA(b) gene; Yellow stem borer resistance
1 Introduction
Deepwater rice (DWR) is grown on about 9
million hectares of flooded lands in Asia (the river
basins of Ganges – Brahmaputra of India and Bangladesh, the Irrawaddy of Myanmar, the Mekong of Vietnam and Cambodia, and the Chao Phraya of Thailand) and West Africa (up-per and middle basins of the Niger River) [1] Farmers in these areas are very poor and follow the traditional system of rice cultivation [2] DWR
is grown in areas usually flooded deeper than 50
cm (sometimes up to 400 cm) for 1 month or longer during the growing season [3]
Conse-Abbre 6iations: 2,4-D, 2,4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid;
NAA, 1- a Napthalene acetic acid.
* Corresponding author Tel.: + 63 2 8450563, 8450569;
fax: + 63 2 7612406; 8450606; e-mail: sdatta@irri.cgnet.com
0168-9452/98/$19.00 © 1998 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd All rights reserved.
PII S0168-9452(98)00053-3
Trang 2quently, only traditional tall and elongating rice
cultivars can be grown in these areas The yield of
these cultivars is generally low (1 – 2 t ha− 1) and
very often, reduced further by insect attack
Stem borers are important pests of rice because
symptoms of injury can be found from sowing to
harvest in all rice ecosystems At the vegetative
stage, stem borer feeding inside the stem can
result in the death of the youngest leaf whorl,
causing ‘deadhearts’ During the reproductive
stage, stem borer feeding inside the panicle stalk
can lead to grain remaining unfilled, a condition
called ‘whiteheads’ [4] Several species of stem
borer attack DWR, but the major one is
undoubt-edly the yellow stem borer (YSB) It is dominant
in the flood season, and no other species is well
adapted to aquatic conditions It seriously
dam-ages DWR, causing yield losses estimated at 15 –
20% (on the average) and reaching up to 60%
during severe outbreaks [5] No DWR germplasm
has been found to possess acquired resistance to
YSB [6] Additionally, no feasible biological or
cultivation method has been devised to control
this key pest in DWR field [5]
The application of insecticides to DWR possess
many problems Ordinary ground applications are
limited to the pre – flood period and spraying is
not possible when the water is deeper than 50 cm
Moreover, pesticides could affect beneficial
natu-ral predator and cause fish mortality [6] Fish
harvested from DWR fields is a major source of
protein for people living in these areas The
devel-opment of YSB-resistant varieties of DWR will
help farmers in flood-prone ecosystems
significantly
The crystal protein ord-endotoxin from
Bacil-lus thuringiensis has been found very effective in
controlling lepidopteran insects including YSB [7]
Several crop species including rice have been
transformed with cryIA(b)/cryIAc gene from B.
thuringiensis and were shown to be very effective
against stem borers including the YSB [8 – 19]
The development of transformation techniques
presented an opportunity to incorporate this
novel bacterial gene into the rice genome, which is
not possible by conventional breeding methods
Earlier literature dealing with Bt-rice on
japon-ica [10,19] and indjapon-ica [16,18] cultivars for irrigated
ecosystem are not suitable for Bt-management in DWR Hence, the selected transgenic Bt-rice for deep water conditions with enhanced resistance against yellow stem borer will provide a unique opportunity of environmentally friendly pest con-trol avoiding use of insecticides and other chemi-cals in aquatic conditions Therefore, this study was undertaken to develop transgenic rice with YSB resistance for deepwater rice conditions
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Genotype and plasmids
A popular deepwater indica rice cultivar, Vaidehi (TCA48) of Bihar State, India, was used
It is a traditional, tall, photoperiod-sensitive vari-ety with a yield potential of more than 3 t ha− 1 [20] Plasmid pCIBBt1 (Fig 1) carrying the
syn-thetic cryIA(b)Bt gene with the CaMV 35SP was
cotransformed with plasmid pGL2 [21] carrying
the hph gene also driven by the 35SP.
2.2 Transformation
Embryogenic callus (EC) was induced from scutellar tissues of mature seeds on MS medium [22] supplemented with 2 mg 2,4-D l− 1, 30 g maltose l− 1solidified with 8 g agar l− 1(pH 5.8) The EC were bombarded using the biolistic PDS-1000/He (Bio-Rad, USA) at 1300 or 1500 psi, following the manufacturer’s instructions and the protocol published earlier for cereals [11,23 – 26] Selection pressure was applied 16 – 20 h after bom-bardment on fresh callus induction medium con-taining 50 mg hygromycin B l− 1 as described earlier [24] Selection was maintained for 10 – 12 weeks with a change of medium every 2 weeks Surviving callus (embryogenic portion) was placed
Fig 1 Physical map of plasmid pCIBBt1 carrying the
syn-thetic cryIA(b) gene driven by the CaMV35S constitutive promoter.
Trang 3on MS plant preregeneration medium containing
2 mg kinetin l− 1, 0.1 NAA l− 1, 30 g maltose l− 1,
50 mg hygromycin B l− 1 and 8 g agar l− 1, pH
5.8 Cultures were kept in the dark for 1 – 2 weeks
The rest of the steps for plant regeneration of T0
plants were carried out as described by Alam et
al [27]
2.3 DNA extraction and Southern blot analysis
Genomic DNA was extracted by an improved
CTAB method based on the procedure described
by Murray and Thompson [28] Fivemg/l DNA of
each sample, estimated by fluorometry and
treated with RNaseA, was digested with BamHI
and BstEII restriction endonucleases in a final
volume of 50 ml The digested DNA was then
electrophoresed on 1% (w/v) agarose gel and
transferred to hybond N+ nylon membrane
(Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) according to
manufacturer’s instructions DNA fragment of
the Bt endotoxin coding sequence from plasmid
digested with the same enzyme and labeled with
a-32P dCTp using the rediprime labeling kit
(Amersham Arlington Heights, IL) was used as
hybridization probe
2.4 Protein extraction and immunoblot analysis
About 0.5 – 0.8 g fresh leaf or stem tissues of
both transgenic and nontransgenic control plants
were ground in the presence of 1.0 – 1.5 ml 0.05 M
Tris – HCl (pH 7.0) and 10% (v/v) glycerol mixed
with 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulphonylfluoride
(PMSF) at 4°C Centrifugation at 13000 rpm for
10 min followed by 5 min was carried out two
times and supernatants were collected After
de-termining the concentration of total soluble
protein using the Bicinchoninic acid (BCA)
protein assay reagent (PIERCE), each protein
extract was boiled together with sample buffer
(12.5 mM Tris pH 6.8, 20% (v/v) glycerol, 2%
(w/v) SDS, 0.001% (w/v) bromophenol blue, 2%
(v/v) or 0.3 M 2-ME) for 5 min A total of 50mg
soluble protein was loaded per lane in 10% (w/v)
SDS-Polyacrylamide gels Separated polypeptides
were blotted onto nitrocellulose membrane [29] in
the semi-dry transblot SN transfer cell (Bio-Rad,
Hercules, CA, USA) After overnight blocking with 5% (w/v) TBST-milk, Bt proteins were
probed with rabbit anti-BtK protein serum at
room temperature for 20 – 24 h and detected using the procedure described by Lin et al [30]
2.5 Insect bioassay
Plants (T0 and T1) positive in Southern or Western blot analysis were tested for resistance against the YSB A single stem cutting (about 8
cm long) with at least one node (YSB prefer nodes for sucking food) from a plant at the booting stage was placed on a moistened filter paper in a petri dish (100 × 20 mm) Six neonate
larvae of YSB (Scirpophaga incertulas) were
placed on the stem, and the petri dish was sealed using masking tape Incubation was performed for 96 h at 25°C After 96 h, the number of larvae was determined Similar infestation was carried out for control plants Each treatment was repli-cated three times Mortality rates were expressed
as the proportion of dead larvae to applied larvae (%) Missing larvae were grouped within the mor-tality category (i.e as dead larvae)
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Assessment of T0 transformants
From three experiments, out of the small num-ber of T0 transgenic plants (30) produced, two independently transformed lines, VA6 and VA10, were recovered and presented in this study South-ern blot analysis (Fig 2) showed both transfor-mants had the 1.8 kb coding sequence of the
cryIA(b)gene (plasmid pCIBBt1; Fig 1) Multiple bands in VA6 indicated that recombination and rearrangement of the transgene had occurred Re-arrangements of the transgene in T0 transgenic plants were also observed in different crops [11,13,14,16,31,32] Both higher and low molecu-lar weight bands than the expected 1.8 kb size were observed On the other hand, in VA10, several rearrangement of transforming DNA were observed However, both transformants were fer-tile and produced sufficient seeds Expression of
Trang 4Fig 2 Southern blot analysis of T0 plants and some of
selected T1 progeny derived from them From banding
pat-terns two independent transformation events (VA10 and VA6)
were identified Both events showed on 1.8 kb coding sequence
of cryIA(b) gene Nontransformed (NT) plant showed no
bands Except for VA10 – 8, all progenies showed banding
similar to that of their respective T0mother plants.
served in control nontransformed (NT) plants In addition to the expected 65 kDa band, two addi-tional bands (between 46 and 30 kDa) were also observed This could be due to post-transcrip-tional and post-translapost-transcrip-tional changes of the gene
Plants transformed with cryIA(b)/cryIAc gene
showed multiple banding patterns in Western blot analysis [10,13,14,16] About 0.01 – 0.1% of Bt protein was estimated in both transformants, de-termined by comparing the intensity of the band with known 60 kDa pure 10 ng cryIA(b) protein (Fig 3) Bioassay showed correlation with both Southern and Western blot analysis No larvae were found alive on either transformants Consid-ering the bioassay data, it was clear both transfor-mants produced a sufficient amount of Bt protein for complete protection from YSB infestation Low levels of protein expression may help insects
to develop resistance against Bt toxin, which will eventually destroy the utility of Bt transgenic plants In addition, proper managements will be required to prevent the YSB to become resistant
to Bt-positive plants Transgenic plants with high levels of Bt-protein expression could be poten-tially effective when grown in conjunction with untransformed plants to serve as refuges
3.2 E6aluation of T1 progeny
Bt positive T1progeny from both transformants were identified by Southern or western blot analy-ses Results of Southern blot analyses of selected progeny from both transformation events are shown in Fig 4 Except in plant (VA10-8), progeny plants showed Southern banding patterns similar to T0plants The different banding pattern
in VA10-8 indicate that a rearrangement of the transgene may occur in successive generations This may be due to deletion, addition, or translo-cation of the transgene However, further study
on this aspect is needed Multiple generations and additional progeny analysis may provide useful information regarding such rearrangements Goto
et al [33] showed differences in banding patterns among T2 progenies of transgenic rice plants Nayak et al [18] also reported different Southern patterns among progenies of specific transforma-tion event they analyzed
the cryIA(b) gene in both transformants was
confirmed by Western blot analysis (Fig 3) In
both transformants, the expected 65 kDa Bt
protein was detected No such bands were
ob-Fig 3 Immunoblot analysis of protein from T0plants (VA10
and VA6) and one T 1 progeny (VA6-4) of VA6 All three
plants show bands expressed from cryIA(b)Bt gene Besides
the expected 65 kDa, two additional bands between 46 and 30
kDa were also observed The amount of Bt protein (1 – 0.1%)
over total soluble protein was estimated by comparing the
intensity of the band with known 60 kDa pure 10 ng CryIA(b)
protein.
Trang 5Fig 4 Immunoblot analysis of protein from some selected T1progenies of VA10 and VA6 All progenies show banding pattern similar to that of T 0 plants The nontransformed (NT) control plant does not show any band.
Similarly like the case of T0 plants, no larvae
were alive on T1progeny when subjected to insect
bioassays
Transgenic DWR will help farmers in lowland
rice growing areas Field testing of these
trans-genic lines in near future will allow the
under-standing of Bt-gene deployment in lowland rice
This is the first report using transgenic breeding
approach for improving deepwater rice
Acknowledgements
We thank the Rockefeller Foundation and the
BMZ/GTZ for their support Thanks are due to
CIBA-GEIGY for providing the Bt construct
pCIBBt1 We also thank Entomology and Plant
Pathology Divsion, IRRI for helping in the insect
bioassays, Reynaldo Garcia, Jumin Tu and
Nor-man Oliva for their help in the laboratory Drs
Stewart C Neal Jr and R Frutos for the cry
antibody We are also grateful to Michelle Viray
for her help in preparing the manuscript
References
[1] H.D Catling, Rice in deepwater, International Rice
Re-search Institute, Manila, 1992, p 7.
[2] S Saran, K.C John, A Kumar, S Ahmad, M.M Singh,
P Mishra, Incremental method for developing integrated
farming systems in high ecological risk zones, in:
Proceed-ings of the 1990 Asian Farming Systems Research and Extension Symposium on Sustainable Farming Systems in the 21 st century, Asia AIT, Bangkok, 1990.
[3] H.D Catling, D.W Puckridge, D Hillerislambers, The environment of Asian deepwater rice, in: Proceedings of the 1987 International Deepwater Rice Workshop, Bangkok, Thailand, International Rice Research Insti-tute, Manila, Philippines, 1988, pp 11 – 34.
[4] E.G Rubia, K.L Heong, M Zaluchi, B Gonzales, G.A Nortoin, Rice crop compensation stem borer injury, in: Fragile Lives in Fragile Ecosystems Proceedings of the International Rice Research Conference, 13 – 17 February
1995, Manila, Philippines, 1995, pp 817 – 824.
[5] H.D Catling, Z Islam, R Pattrasuhi, Assessing yield
losses in deepwater rice due to yellow stem borer
Scir-pophaga incertulas (Walker) in Bangladesh and Thailand,
Crop Prot 6 (1987) 20 – 27.
[6] Z Islam, H.D Catling, S Pojananuwong, Attempts to control yellow stem borer in deepwater rice with insecti-cides, in: Proceedings of the 1987 International Deepwa-ter Rice Workshop Bangkok, Thailand InDeepwa-ternational Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines, 1988, pp.
551 – 558.
[7] H Ho¨fte, H.R Whiteley, Insecticidal crystal proteis of
Bacillus thuringiensis, Microbial Rev 53 (1989) 242 – 255.
[8] K.A Barton, H.R Whiteley, N.S Yang, Bacillus
thuringiensis d-endotoxin expressed in transgenic
Nico-tiana tabacum provides resistance to lepidopteran insects,
Plant Physiol 85 (1987) 1103 – 1109.
[9] X Delannay, B.J LaValle, R.K Proksch, R.L Fuchs, S.R Sims, J.T Greenplate, P.G Marrone, R.B Dodson, J.J Augustine, J.G Layton, D.A Fischhoff, Field
perfor-mance of transgenic tomato plants expressing the Bacillus
thuringiensis 6ar kurstaki insect control protein, Bio/
Technology 7 (1989) 1265 – 1269.
[10] H Fujimoto, K Itoh, M Yamamoto, J Kyozuka, Ko Shimamoto, Insect resistant rice generated by introduc-tion of a modified d-endotoxin gene of Bacillus
thuringiensis, Bio/Technology 11 (1993) 1151 – 1155.
Trang 6[11] M.G Koziel, G.L Beland, C Bowman, N.B Carozzi, R.
Crenshaw, L Crossland, J Dawsonn, N Desai, M Hill,
S Kadwell, K Lauris, K Lewis, D Maddox, K.
McPherson, M.R Meghji, E Merlin, R Rhodes, G.W.
Warren, M Wrights, S.V Evola, Field performance of
elite transgenic maize plants expressing an insecticidal
protein derived from Bacillus thuringiensis,
Bio/Technol-ogy 11 (1993) 194 – 200.
[12] F.J Perlak, R.W Deaton, T.A Armstrong, R.L Fuchs,
S.R Sims, J.T Greenplate, D.A Fischhoff, Insect
resis-tant cotton plants, Bio/Technology 8 (1990) 939 – 943.
[13] C.N Stewart Jr., M.J Adang, J.N All, H.R Boerma, G.
Cardineau, D Tucker, W.A Parrott, Genetic
transforma-tion, recovery and characterization of fertile soybean
transgenic for a synthetic Bacillus thuringiensis cryIAc
gene, Plant Physiol 112 (1996) 121 – 129.
[14] K Datta, A Vasquez, J Tu, L Torrizo, M.F Alam, N.
Oliva, E Abrigo, M Cohen, G.S Khush, S.K Datta,
Constitutive and tissue-specific differential expression of
cryIA(b) gene in transgenic rice plants conferring
resis-tance to rice insect pest Theor Appl Genet (1997) in
press.
[15] M Vaeck, A Reynaerts, H Ho¨fte, S Jansens, M De
Beuckeleer, C Dean, M Zabeau, M.V Montagu, J.
Leemans, Transgenic plants protected from insect attack,
Nature 328 (1987) 33 – 37.
[16] J Wu¨nn, A Klo¨ti, P.K Burkhardt, G.C Ghosh Biswas,
K Launis, V.A Iglesia, I Potrykus, Transgenic indica
rice breeding line IR58 expressing a synthetic cryIA(b)
gene from Bacilllus thuringiensis provides effective insect
pest control, Bio/Technology 14 (1996) 171 – 176.
[17] C Singsit, M.J Adang, R.E Lynch, W.F Anderson, A.
Wang, G Cardineau, P Ozias-akins, Expressing of a
Bacillus thuringiensis cryIA(c) gene in transgenic peanut
plants and its efficiency against lesser corn stalk borer,
Transgenic Res 6 (1997) 169 – 176.
[18] P Nayak, D Basu, S Das, A Basu, D Ghosh, N.A.
Ramakrishna, M Ghosh, S.K Sen, Transgenic elite
in-dica rice plants expressing CryIAc d-endotoxin of Bacillus
thuringiensis are resistant against yellow stem borer
(Scir-pophaga incertulas), Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A 94
(1997) 2111 – 2116.
[19] C Wu, Y Fan, C Zhang, N Oliva, S.K Datta,
Trans-genic fertile japonica rice plants expressing a modified
cryIA(b) gene resistant to yellow stem borer Plant Cell
Rep., 16 (1997) in press.
[20] R Thakur, Prioritization and development of breeding
strategies for rainfed lowlands: a critical appraisal, in:
Fragile Lives in Fragile Ecosystems Proceedings of the
International Rice Research Conference, 13 – 17 February
1995, Manila, Philippines, 1995, pp 587 – 591.
[21] S.K Datta, A Peterhans, K Datta, I Potrykus, Geneti-cally engineered fertile Indica-rice plants recovered from protoplasts, Bio/Technology 8 (1990) 736 – 740.
[22] T Murashige, F Skoog, A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures, Phys-iol Plant 15 (1962) 473 – 497.
[23] P Christou, T.L Ford, M Kofron, Production of
trans-genic rice (Oryza sati 6a) plants from agronomically
im-portant indica and japonica varieties via electric discharge particle acceleration of exogenous DNA into immature zygotic embryos, Bio/Technology 9 (1991) 957 – 962 [24] L Li, R Qu, A Kochko de, C Fauquet, R.N Beachy,
An improved rice transformation system using the biolis-tic method, Plant Cell Rep 12 (1993) 250 – 255 [25] V Vasil, V Srivastava, A.M Castillo, M.E Fromm, I.K Vasil, Rapid production of transgenic wheat plants by direct bombardment of cultured immature embryos, Bio/ Technology 11 (1993) 1553 – 1558.
[26] D Becker, R Brettschneider, H Lo¨rz, Fertile transgenic wheat from microprojectile bombardment of scuteller tis-sue, Plant J 5 (2) (1994) 299 – 307.
[27] M.F Alam, N.P Oliva, F.J Zapata, S.K Datta, Fertile transgenic indica rice plants by PEG-mediated protoplast transformation, J Genet Breed 49 (1995) 303 – 308 [28] M.G Murray, W.F Thompson, Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA, Nucleic Acids Res 8 (1980)
4321 – 4325.
[29] H.T Towbin, T Staelhelin, J Gordon, Electrophoretic transfers of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocel-lulose sheets, Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A 76 (1979)
4350 – 4354.
[30] W Lin, C.S Anuratha, K Datta, I Potrykus, S Muthukrishnan, S.K Datta, Genetic engineering of rice for resistance to sheath blight, Bio/Technology 13 (1995)
686 – 691.
[31] P Christou, W.F Swain, N.S Yang, D.E McCabe, Inheritance and expression of foreign genes in transgenic soybean plants, Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A 86 (1989)
7500 – 7504.
[32] J Cooley, T Ford, P Christou, Molecular and genetic characterization of elite transgenic rice plants produced
by electric-discharge particle acceleration, Theor Appl Genet 90 (1995) 97 – 104.
[33] F Goto, S Toki, H Uchimiya, Inheritance of a co-trans-ferred foreign gene in the progenies of transgenic rice plants, Transgenic Res 2 (1993) 300 – 305.