1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Báo cáo khoa học: The antibiotic activity of cationic linear amphipathic peptides: lessons from the action of leucine/lysine copolymers on bacteria of the class Mollicutes doc

11 331 0
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 11
Dung lượng 285,81 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

The antibacterial activity of the amphipathic a-helical peptides varied with their size, 15 residues beingthe optimal length, independent of the membrane hydrophobic core thickness and t

Trang 1

The antibiotic activity of cationic linear amphipathic peptides:

lessons from the action of leucine/lysine copolymers on bacteria

Laure Be´ven1, Sabine Castano2, Jean Dufourcq2, A˚ke Wieslander3and Henri Wro´blewski1

1

UMR CNRS 6026, Universite´ de Rennes 1, France;2Centre de Recherche Paul Pascal, CNRS, Pessac, France;

3

Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Sweden

Peptides composed of leucyl and lysyl residues (LK

pep-tides) with different compositions and sequences were

compared for their antibacterial activities usingcell wall-less

bacteria of the class Mollicutes (acholeplasmas,

mycoplas-mas and spiroplasmycoplas-mas) as targets The antibacterial activity

of the amphipathic a-helical peptides varied with their size,

15 residues beingthe optimal length, independent of the

membrane hydrophobic core thickness and the amount of

cholesterol The 15-residue ideally amphipathic a helix with

a +5 positive net charge (KLLKLLLKLLLKLLK) had the

strongest antibacterial activity, similar to that of melittin In

contrast, scrambled peptides devoid of amphipathy and the

less hydrophobic b-sheeted peptides [(LK)nK], even those

15-residue long, were far less potent than the helical ones

Furthermore, the growth inhibitory activity of the peptides

was correlated with their ability to abolish membrane

potential These data are fully consistent with a

predominantly flat orientation of LK peptides at the lipid/ water interface and strongly supports that these peptides and probably the linear polycationic amphipathic defence pep-tides act on bacterial membranes in four main steps accordingto the carpet model: (a) interfacial partitioning with accumulation of monomers on the target membrane (limitingstep); (b) peptide structural changes (conformation, aggregation, and orientation) induced by interactions with the lipid bilayer (as already shown with liposomes and erythrocytes); (c) plasma membrane permeabilization/ depolarization via a detergent-like effect; and (d) rapid bacterial cell death if the extent of depolarization is main-tained above a critical threshold

Keywords: amphipathic peptides; antibacterial activity; bacterial cell death; membrane depolarization; mollicutes

The amphipathic a helix concept helps in understandingthe

behaviour of very different classes of proteins and peptides,

especially those actingon membranes [1–4] This concept,

which has been useful in the field of peptidic cytotoxins to

develop new analogues, and to better understand their

mode of action [5–7], is still the basis for the rational design

of new antimicrobial compounds, i.e analogues or chimeras

of natural products [8], or radically new molecules [9,10]

The need to understand their mode of action and improve

their efficacy and/or selectivity towards microorganisms led

to the synthesis of new active peptides, made possible largely

by the progress in solid state synthesis As a result, a large

wealth of information was obtained on many natural

peptides endowed with cytotoxic (includingantimicrobial)

activity However, answers are still missing regarding: (a) the

requirements for optimized activity and selectivity; and (b) the mechanisms of action, especially in bacterial cells In

an effort of rationalization, a minimalistic approach was initiated by the pioneeringwork of De Grado and Lear [11] usingresidue substitutions or designingsimplified sequences [2,12–14] Usingthe very minimal requirement of an amphipathic structure able to associate properly with either hydrophilic or hydrophobic side chains, several families of peptides were designed including those composed of only leucines and lysines (LK peptides) [11,14–17] Ideally secon-dary amphipathic structures (helices or b sheets) can thus be obtained by playingonly with the composition (i.e the L/K molar ratio) and charge periodicity [11,18–21] The lytic activities of these peptides vary accordingto the L/K ratio [22,23] and a specific sequence is not required to get an adequate polar/apolar topology and a strong membranolytic activity, matchingthose of the stronger natural toxins [20,24]

In homologous series of such LK peptides, the observed lytic activities on zwitterionic liposomes and erythrocytes are similar havingan optimum at a length of 15 residues, i.e there is a delicate balance between hydrophobicity and charge repulsion (two antagonistic forces) [14,22,25] Due to the lipid affinity of such peptides, there is an increase of lytic activity with chain length Moreover, in contrast with earlier studies [26], neither a threshold in length nor a matching between peptide length and membrane thickness was observed [21,24,25] This strongly supports a mechanism

Correspondence to H Wro´blewski, UMR CNRS 6026,

Universite´ de Rennes 1, Campus de Beaulieu,

35042 Rennes Cedex, France Fax: + 33 2 23 23 50 52,

E-mail: wroblews@univ-rennes1.fr

Abbreviations: CFU, colony forming unit; Dns, dansyl; MIC, minimal

inhibitory concentration; MDC, minimal deformingconcentration;

DpH, transmembrane pH gradient (DpH ¼ pH in ) pH out );

DY, membrane electrical potential (DY ¼ Y in –Y out ).

(Received 12 December 2002, revised 19 March 2003,

accepted 24 March 2003)

Trang 2

of action based upon the invasion of the outer membrane

leaflet by the peptides and their insertion in a flat orientation

to form rafts or carpets [21,24,25,27,28]

In this work, we studied the antibacterial activities of a

homologous series of 8–22-residue LK peptides having

different sequences, hydrophobicities and secondary

struc-tures Our goal was to assess whether or not the rules drawn

from the studies with model membranes and erythrocytes

[21,25] are also valid for bacteria Mollicutes were chosen as

targets because these bacteria are devoid of both a cell wall

and an outer membrane [29] makingthem sensitive to many

natural membrane-active peptides Peptide activities were

monitored at different physiological levels: growth

inhibi-tion, plasma membrane depolarizainhibi-tion, and cell shape

modification [30] Furthermore, to get a better insight into

the mechanism of action, we compared the activities of a

series of peptides differingin length on Acholeplasma

laidlawiicells whose membrane thickness can be tuned via

the lipid diet [31,32]

Materials and methods

Chemicals

Ultrapure mellitin was from Sigma Dansylated (Dns)

peptides were synthesized by Fournier Pharma (Heidelberg,

Germany) and all the other peptides were from Neosystem

(Strasbourg, France) [24,25] The purity of the peptides was

 97% as estimated by HPLC and their mass was consistent

with that expected from the sequence They were stored as dry powders at )20 C and dissolved just before use in methanol to give 1 or 10 mMstock solutions The peptides were named accordingto their length and K-residue periodicity (2.0, 3.0 or 3.6 indicatingwhether they were designed as amphipathic b strands, 3.10helices or a helices, respectively; Table 1) A scrambled 15-residue peptide [scr-LK15(W14)] was used as a nonamphipathic control peptide,

in which the K residues are distributed to achieve a hydrophobic moment close to zero [25] This peptide has free N and C termini, and leucine 14 is substituted by a tryptophan residue

HPLC Retention times of the peptides were measured by reversed-phase HPLC on a C18 Purospher RP-18 end-capped semipreparative column (125· 4 mm, 5-lm particle size) in conjunction with a Waters Millenium HPLC system, as described previously [25]

Antimicrobial assays The mollicutes Acholeplasma laidlawii A-EF22, Myco-plasma gallisepticum S6, M mycoides ssp mycoides SC KH3J, Spiroplasma citri R8A2, S floricola BNR1, and

S melliferum BC3 were cultured as described previously [30] The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined in 96-well microtitre plates by growing the

Table 1 Listing of the peptides used in this work Dansylation of peptides is indicated by Dns and D L, length of the peptide (residuesÆmol)1);

S, membrane-bound peptide conformation (note that although peptides LK8(3.6), LK9(3.6) and DnsLK9(3.6) were designed to form ideally amphipathic a helices, they adopt an extended conformation when interactingwith lipid bilayers; similarly, peptide LK16(W15)(3.0) which was designed to form an ideally amphipathic 3 10 helix is in fact a-helical when interactingwith spiroplasma lipids; C, Charge Lysine periodicity (2.0, 3.0

or 3.6) is indicated in parentheses to help peptide identification in the text.

Alpha-amphi series

3 10 -amphi

Beta-amphi series

Scrambled

Natural

Trang 3

bacteria in the presence of twofold serial dilutions of

peptide The startingcell concentration in each well was 106

colony-formingunits (CFU)ÆmL)1 All assays were

per-formed in triplicate Bactericidal activities were assessed by

spreadingon agar plates cells treated for 2 h with different

peptide concentrations The minimal lethal concentration

was defined as the lowest peptide concentration capable of

killing99% of the cells in a suspension containing

106CFUÆmL)1 In addition, to determine the influence of

the hydrophobic core thickness of the cell membrane on

peptide antibiotic activity, A laidlawii A-EF22 was adapted

to grow in a lipid-free medium supplemented with

appro-priate fatty acids, as described previously [32,33]

Light microscopy

All of the experiments were performed on spiroplasma cell

suspensions containing1010CFUÆml)1 (A600¼ 1.0) in

50 mMsodium phosphate buffer pH 7.0, 50 mM D-glucose

and 549 mM D-sorbitol Dark-field optics were used to

analyse the effects of the peptides on spiroplasma motility

and cell morphology, as described previously [30,33–35]

Microphotographs were taken using Kodak T-Max 35-mm

film (ISO 400 or 3200)

Membrane potential measurement

Alterations of membrane potential by peptides in A

laid-lawiiand S melliferum were probed spectrofluorometrically

usingthe fluorescent dye

3,3¢-dipropyl-2,2¢-thiadicarbocya-nine iodide [36] A detailed description of the experimental

conditions and of the calibration method of fluorescence

signal vs membrane potential is given in previous reports

[33,34]

Determination of intracellular pH The intracellular pH of A laidlawii and S melliferum cells was determined by spectrofluorometry usingthe internally conjugated fluorescent probe 5(6-)-carboxyfluorescein suc-cinimidyl ester [37] as described previously [33]

Protein and cholesterol determination Protein was determined with the bicinchoninic acid method [38] usingBSA as standard Peptide concentrations were estimated from absorbance measurements using

e340¼ 4640M )1Æcm)1 for dansylated peptides and

e280¼ 5600M )1Æcm)1for tryptophan-containingpeptides Total cholesterol was determined in the chloroform/meth-anol membrane lipid fraction with the Sigma Diagnostics Cholesterol reagent kit

Results

Antibacterial activity of the peptides as a function

of length and structure The first step of our work was to screen the growth inhibition activities of 15 LK peptides towards six different species of mollicutes Melittin was used as a reference because it is a well known cytotoxic peptide which is lethal for mollicutes [30,33] The diversity of the LK peptides used

in this study (Table 1) allowed us to assess the importance

of both peptide length and structure for antibacterial activity

Table 2 shows that the susceptibility of mollicutes to melittin and the LK peptides was independent of the amount of cholesterol in the membranes of these bacteria

Table 2 Antibacterial activities of LK peptides and melittin against several species of mollicutes.

Cholesterol (%) a

MICs (l M )

Alb (2.1)

Mg (7.2)

Mm (3.5)

Sc (25.2)

Sf (16.8)

Sm (22.2) Peptides

a

The percentage (by mass) of cholesterol in the whole membrane lipid fraction of the different bacteria (% chol.) is indicated below the abbreviation of their name b Bacterial targets: A laidlawii (Al), M gallisepticum (Mg), M mycoides ssp mycoides SC (Mm), S citri (Sc),

S floricola (Sf), and S melliferum (Sm) R, No activity at concentrations £ 100 l

Trang 4

The most potent of the LK peptides was, overall,

LK15(3.6), i.e the peptide designed to adopt an ideal

amphipathic a-helical conformation (KLLKLLLKLLLK

LLK) With MICs ranging from 1.56 to 6.25 lM, this

molecule exhibited a growth inhibition activity similar to

that of melittin (MIC, 0.39–12.5 lM) In this series, the

12-residue peptide was much less potent but, interestingly,

dansylation increased its activity whilst the same

modifi-cation decreased the activity of the 15-residue peptide

Shorter peptides (8 or 9 residues) displayinga b

confor-mation in the membrane-bound state [24] were poorly

effective or harmless, even at concentrations up to 100 lM

Longer peptides [DnsLK19(3.6) and DnsLK22(3.6)] were

also less active, but the relationship between length and

activity was less clear than in the case of the shorter

peptides In addition, the L14W substitution in LK15(3.6)

had no effect on activity Collectively, these observations

indicate that for ideally amphipathic a helices composed of

only leucine and lysine, a sequence of 15 residues

constitutes the optimal length to inhibit the growth of

mollicutes

Table 2 also shows that with MICs ranging from 0.78 to

12.5 lM, LK16(W15)(3.0), the peptide designed to form

ideally amphipathic 3.10 helices but which, in fact, is

a-helical in membranes (data not shown), was as effective

as LK15(3.6) (L/K¼ 2) In comparison, peptides of the

beta-amphi series designed to form ideally amphipathic b

strands, were significantly less effective The MICs of

Dns-LK15(2.0) (L/K¼ 1) were similar to those of DnsLK9(3.6)

So, here again a decrease of the length in the same series

below 15 residues resulted in a loss of activity Finally,

scramblingthe sequence of LK15(W14)(3.6) [peptide

scr-LK15(W14)] strongly decreased its activity, notably

against M mycoides ssp mycoides SC and the three

spiroplasmas This second set of data pinpoints the

import-ance of peptide charge topology, showing this time that

provided they have the optimum length (i.e 15 residues),

ideally amphipathic helices are significantly more potent in

inhibiting the growth of mollicutes than irregular sequences

with the same composition and than ideally amphipathic

b sheets

It should also be noted that platingpeptide-treated

mollicutes on agar broth revealed that the most active

peptides (MICs < 50 lM) were bactericidal as no surviving

cells could be detected by this method after a 2 h peptide

treatment

Spiroplasma cell deformation by the peptides

In contrast with other mollicutes (e.g acholeplasmas and

mycoplasmas), spiroplasmas exhibit a helical shape and

motility which are altered by membranotropic peptides, a

phenomenon easy to observe by dark-field light microscopy

[30,33–35] In the second step of this work, we have thus

assessed, using S melliferum as a target, the cell deforming

activity of LK15(3.6) compared with melittin Upon

treatment with the latter, the cells lost their motility and

helical shape Deformation of 100% of the cells could be

achieved within seconds with 1 lM melittin, which

ham-pered a reliable microphotographic recording However, as

the effects were both concentration- and time-dependent, it

was possible to find conditions compatible with the

technique Hence, 100% of the cells (1010CFUÆmL)1) were deformed with 0.1 lM melittin within 5 min whilst only 50% were deformed within the same time with 0.01 lM melittin At this latter concentration, a limit of 55–60% was reached after 10 min (Fig 1) In the same conditions, LK15(W14)(3.6) was less efficient than melittin at the lowest concentration (20% cells deformed after 10 min) but equally active at the highest one

As the spiroplasma cell deformation test proved to be relevant and reliable to investigate the membranotropic activity of antibacterial peptides, this technique was used to assess the importance of the structure of the LK peptides Table 3 [columns MDC (minimal deformingconcentra-tion)50and MDC100] reveals that, consistent with the results

of growth inhibition tests, the activity of melittin was matched by LK15(3.6), LK15(W14)(3.6), and to a lesser extent by LK16(W15)(3.0) In contrast, scr-LK15(W14) exhibited a deformingactivity about two orders of magni-tude weaker and the Dns(LK)n-series peptides were harm-less independently of their length

Hence, the secondary structure and amphiphilicity of model peptides composed of L and K residues were also critical parameters in the spiroplasma cell deformation test

Fig 1 Time-course of S melliferum cell deformation by melittin and LK15(3.6) Spiroplasma cells (1010CFUÆmL)1) energ ized with 50 m M

D -glucose in 50 m M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0, 32 C) con-taining549 m M D -sorbitol as osmoprotectant were treated with different peptide concentrations and pictures were recorded with a light microscope equipped with dark-field optics The cells were considered deformed as soon as they lost their helicity Points on the curves are the average of three determinations (SD £ 4.5%).

Trang 5

The 15-residue ideally amphipathic helix LK15(3.6) proved

again to be the optimal structure in contrast with b-sheeted

structures or a scrambled sequence

Membrane depolarization by the peptides

We have previously shown that there is a correlation

between the ability of peptides to inhibit the growth of

mollicutes, to abolish the membrane potential, and to

deform spiroplasma cells [30,33–35] The next step of this

work was to investigate the depolarizing activity of the LK

peptides Fig 2 shows that the relative efficacy of LK15(3.6)

compared with melittin was the same in A laidlawii and

S melliferum with respect to the extent of membrane

depolarization and the delay necessary to reach a

steady-state level of depolarization Actually, 0.1 lM melittin

totally depolarized the A laidlawii membrane within

5 min and that of S melliferum by 41% Under the same

conditions (109CFUÆmL)1), 0.1 lMLK15(3.6) depolarized

the A laidlawii membrane by 64% and that of S melliferum

by 16%

S melliferum beingmore robust than A laidlawii was

then used to compare the depolarizingactivities of 15- and

16-residue LK peptides havingdifferent structures Table 3

(DDY columns) shows that the depolarization of the

S melliferum membrane mirrored the spiroplasma cell

deformation phenomenon described above Indeed, here

again melittin, LK15(3.6), LK15(W14)(3.6), and LK16

(W15)(3.0) proved to be more effective than scr-LK15(W14)

whilst the three Dns(LK)n peptides produced a negligible

effect at best

Abolition of the transmembrane pH gradient

by the peptides

After havinganalysed the effects of melittin and LK15(3.6)

on the membrane potential of A laidlawii and S

melli-ferum, we have investigated the ability of these peptides to

alter (RT/F)· DpH, i.e the second component of the

protonmotive force The transmembrane pH gradient

(DpH¼ pHin) pHout) was thus measured at 37C for

A laidlawiiand 32C for S melliferum vs extracellular pH (pHout) (Fig 3) When energized with 50 mM D-glucose,

A laidlawiiand S melliferum cells (109CFUÆmL)1) gener-ated in slightly buffered solutions a D

to be stable for at least 20 min This transmembrane gradient increased linearly from 0.23 to 1.31 in A laidlawii (Fig 3A) and from 0 to 1.34 in S melliferum (Fig 3B) when pHoutdecreased from 7.5 to 5.0 Immediately after the addition of 0.1 lMmelittin or LK15(3.6), the DpH increased transiently for about 2 min and then dropped within 2 min

to reach a steady value, always lower than that observed in the absence of peptide As expected from DY measurements (see above), 0.1 lMLK15(3.6) diminished the DpH in both mollicutes almost as efficiently as melittin The linear relationship of DpH vs pHoutindicates that the activity of both peptides was independent of the extracellular pH within the explored range (5.0–7.5) which largely covers the conditions found by bacteria either in their animal hosts or

in culture media

Table 3 Effect of melittin and LK peptides on Spiroplasma melliferum

cell shape and membrane potential MDC 50 and MDC 100 are the

min-imal concentrations (l M ) required for the deformation of 50% and

100% of the cells, respectively, upon 5 min of action No stands for no

observed effect DDY is the percentage of membrane depolarization

induced by 0.1 and 1 l M peptide concentrations (unperturbed

poten-tial: 68 ± 5 mV, inside negative; SD, 4%) upon 10 min of action.

Peptides MDC 50 MDC 100

DDY 0.1 l M 1 l M

LK15(W14)(3.6) 0.05 0.1 17 65

LK16(W15)(3.6) 0.1 0.2 16 65

Fig 2 Time-course of A laidlawii and S melliferum plasma mem-branes depolarization by melittin and LK15(3.6) The cells (109 CFUÆmL)1) were energized with 50 m M D -glucose in 5 m M Hepes buffer (pH 7.0) containingeither 150 m M NaCl (A laidlawii) or

128 m M NaCl (S melliferum) Measurements were performed at 37 C for A laidlawii and 32 C for S melliferum The arrows indicate the time at which the peptides were injected into the cell suspensions The curves are the means of three determinations (SD £ 4%) A laidlawii (- -) and S melliferum (—).

Trang 6

Influence of membrane thickness on the antibacterial

activity of the peptides

The possibility of modifyingthe A laidlawii membrane

lipid bilayer via the fatty acids incorporated into the

growth medium [29,31,32] was exploited to study the

influence of membrane thickness on the antibacterial

activity of LiKj a-helical amphipathic peptides (i¼ 2j)

A laidlawii was thus grown under conditions allowing

23, 25, 26.3 or 28-A˚ membrane hydrophobic core

thick-ness to be obtained (Table 4) As previously shown [33],

the MIC of honey bee melittin increased from 0.78 to

3.12 lM when increasingthe hydrophobic thickness from

23 to 28 A˚ However, even with the thickest cell

membrane, the activity of melittin was still very high

With activities similar to those of mellitin, LK15(3.6) and

Dns-LK15(3.6) were the most efficient of the LK

peptides for the four types of membranes, i.e

independ-ent of the membrane thickness Their inhibitory activities

decayed as peptide length was either decreased or

increased but, similar to the results obtained in the

growth inhibition experiments (Table 2), the loss of

activity due to peptide lengthening was less sharp than

that due to peptide shortening It should also be stressed

that the 25-A˚ hydrophobic core membrane which

contained exclusively 16 : 1c fatty acyl chains and no

cholesterol was overall more sensitive to the peptides

than the three other membranes

Fig 3 Effect of melittin and LK15(3.6) on the transmembrane pH gradient of A laidlawii (A) and S melliferum (B) DpH ¼ pH in ) pH out Measurements were performed at 37 C for A laidlawii and 32 C for S melliferum Each point on the curves is the mean of three independent determinations (SD £ 3%).

Table 4 Influence of Acholeplasma laidlawii membrane thickness on the antibacterial activity of melittin and LK peptides of the alpha-amphi series Data are expressed as l M MIC R, No growth inhibition for concentrations £ 100 l M A laidlawii (strain A-EF22) was grown in lipid-free medium supplemented with: (a) 75 l M tetradecanoic acid (14 : 0) + 75 l M Dcis-9-tetradecanoic acid (14 : 1c); (b) 150 l M Dcis-9-hexadecanoic acid (16 : 1c); (c) 150 l M Dcis-9-octadecanoic acid (18 : 1c); and (d) 150 l M Dcis-9-octadecanoic acid (18 : 1c) + 20 l M

cholesterol These conditions give the following compositions in membrane lipids: (a) 14 : 0 + 14 : 1, molar ratio, 50/50; (b) 100%

16 : 1c; (c) 100% 18 : 1c; and (d) 18 : 1c + cholesterol, molar ratio, 75/25 The average thickness of the A laidlawii A-EF22 membrane hydrophobic core, in these conditions, was previously determined to be

23 A˚, 25 A˚, 26.3 A˚ and 28 A˚ [32].

Peptide

Membrane thickness

23 A˚ 25 A˚ 26.3 A˚ 28 A˚

DnsLK9(3.6) 3.12 0.78 12.5 50

LK15(3.6) 0.39 0.78 1.56 0.78 DnsLK15(3.6) 0.78 0.78 3.12 1.56

DnsLK22(3.6) 6.25 6.25 12.5 12.5 Melittin 0.78 0.78 1.56 3.12

Trang 7

Previous studies based on the action of minimalist LK

peptides on model membranes and erythrocytes showed

that the critical parameters governing activity are peptide

length, total hydrophobicity, amphipathy, and secondary

structure, which collectively determine peptide membrane

affinity [21,24,25] However, due to the complexity of

bacterial cells compared to liposomes and erythrocytes, it

was necessary to check whether these rules hold also for the

antimicrobial activity of these peptides In this work, we

have taken advantage of the fact that bacteria of the class

Mollicutesare devoid of an outer membrane and of a cell

wall, to avoid possible interferences of these structures in the

interactions between peptides and the bacterial plasma

membrane

Most of the LK peptides studied here exhibited an

antibacterial activity in agreement with previous studies on

closely related compounds [15,23] The activity varied with

peptide length, the optimum occurring for the 15-residue

ideally amphipathic a-helical structure [LK15(3.6)] the

activity of which was similar to that of melittin, a bee

venom peptide known as one of the most efficient natural

peptides in killingbacteria [8,39–41]

Lengthening peptides of the alpha-amphi series (generic

composition LiKjwith i¼ 2j) over 15 residues did not result

in a parallel increase in activity This was previously found

for their efficacy to induce leakage in lipid vesicles and

erythrocytes, and was shown to be due to the

self-association of such a helices in solution [25] However,

unlike haemolysis the bactericidal activity dropped more

severely from 18- to 21-residue length before a slight

increase for the 22-residue peptide (Fig 4) Thus, two

competingprocesses probably occur in bacteria and

eryth-rocytes as in the case of artificial membranes [25,42,43]: (a) a

progressive increase of the membrane affinity with peptide

length; and (b) a drop of activity due to decreased free

energy in solution upon oligomer formation The opposite

effects produced by dansylatingshort or longpeptides are

consistent with this interpretation Indeed, for short

pep-tides the dansyl group promotes activity by increasing

hydrophobicity, and thus membrane affinity, whilst for

peptides longer than 15 residues, already too hydrophobic

to remain in the monomeric state in buffer, dansylation

favours oligomerization at the expense of lipid affinity The

total lack of activity of LK18(3.6) and LK21(3.6) compared

to LK22(3.6) does not contradict this interpretation because

these peptides have no K at the N terminus but, instead,

several L residues increasinghydrophobicity and thus

oligomerization tendency

The beta-amphi series peptides [i.e (LK)nK peptides] are

much less hydrophobic and have a larger charge repulsion

They are thus monomeric in water and have a lower affinity

for lipids than the alpha-amphi series peptides (i.e LiKj

peptides with i¼ 2j) of same length [21] This explains why

these peptides are less active against bacteria (as observed in

this work) and also less haemolytic [21,25]

In addition to total charge and hydrophobicity, the

topology of the distribution of L and K residues proved to

be important: the more the peptides were amphipathic, the

more they were active against mollicutes This is clearly

shown for L10K5 peptides by comparingthe MICs of the

ideally amphipathic peptide L10K5(3.6) and of the scrambled one [scr-LK15(W14)], although LK16W15(3.0) which folds into a nonamphipathic a helix, keeps also quite

a high activity These secondary amphipathic peptides proved to be more active than previously studied primary amphipathic ones in which the positive charges were clustered at the C termini of the molecules (see e.g [33]) Hence, contrary to haemolysis, the antibacterial activity seems to be more sensitive to peptide aggregation and less sensitive to amphipathy

LK peptides have different secondary structures when bound to lipids: the LiKjpeptides (with i¼ 2j and n > 12) are a-helical [24] whilst the shorter and/or alternated ones [(KL)nK] fold into antiparallel b sheets [25] It is also noteworthy that the scrambled peptide scr-LK15(W14) is b-sheeted when bound to dimyristoyl phosphatidyl choline [24] but a-helical in the presence of spiroplasma lipids [44] This might be due to the fact that dimyristoyl phospha-tidylcholine is zwitterionic whilst the spiroplasma mem-brane contains anionic lipids The beta-amphi series peptides were less active against mollicutes than their more hydrophobic ideally amphipathic a-helical homologues However, both a-helical and b-sheeted peptides acted on

Fig 4 Comparison of the effects of alpha-amphi series peptide length on antibacterial and haemolytic activities Antibacterial activities (black curve) are expressed as MIC)1 The data were normalized in such a way that the highest activity, corresponding to a MIC of 0.78 l M , was given a value of 100 Haemolytic activities (grey curve) were taken from [25] and expressed as the inverse of the concentration inducing 50% of lysis (LC150).

Trang 8

different species of mollicutes with the same rankingwithin

their respective series: A laidlawii> M

gallisepti-cum> S citri S floricola  S melliferum  M

myco-mycoides ssp mycoides SC, while for melittin S citri and

S floricolawere much more sensitive Such a rankingseems

therefore more relevant to peculiarities of these bacteria

whose lipid composition varies accordingto the species,

than to properties of the peptides Despite the fact they are

less efficient than their a-helical homologues, peptides of the

beta-amphi series are also intrinsically capable of killing

mollicutes This suggests that within this series, longer

peptides should prove more efficient in growth inhibition

tests than those used in this work

Measurements of DY and DpH in A laidlawii and

S melliferum revealed that the antibacterial activities of

the peptides were correlated with their ability to depolarize

the plasma membrane (Tables 2 and 3, and Figs 2 and 3) In

the case of S melliferum, the loss of cell motility and helicity

induced by the action of LK peptides was also correlated

with membrane depolarization as previously observed with

several natural antibacterial peptides [30] However, MICs

were about one order of magnitude higher than depolarizing

concentrations This difference is probably due to

lipopro-teins present in the culture medium used for growth

inhibition assays As serum components compete with

membranes for the bindingof membrane-active peptides

[45–47], they should indeed increase their apparent MICs

Our data indicate that the bactericidal activity of LK

peptides towards mollicutes is due to their ability to

permeabilize the plasma membrane; this raises the question

of the molecular mechanism governing their action In the

case of hydrophobic peptides such as alamethicin,

experi-mental data indicate that permeabilization occurs through

the formation of ion-conductingtransmembrane channels

in accordance with the barrel-stave model [35,48]

How-ever, such a mechanism hardly fits LK peptides, even the

a-helical ones, because of their polycationic nature and

charge periodicity (+1 per a-helix turn) Indeed, the

transfer of five or more positive charges per molecule from

water into the hydrophobic core of the lipid bilayer is

energetically extremely unfavourable unless they are

pro-perly counterbalanced by a set of negative charges in register

with them Hence, if transient transmembrane bundles of

LK peptide helices were to exist, such bundles would be very

unstable because of K+/K+electrostatic repulsions [49,50]

It should also be stressed that the a helix LK15(3.6) is

anyway too short to span the membrane bilayer

hydropho-bic core, even in the case of the thinnest A laidlawii

membrane (see Table 4) A 15-residue helix would be

22.5 A˚ long, i.e very close to the thickness of the membrane

hydrophobic core (23 A˚), but polarity of the N and C

termini should hamper their localization within an apolar

environment In contrast, with a length of  50 A˚, the

b strand DnsLK15(2.0) is too longfor a correct

transmem-brane fit In fact, PM-IRRAS spectra show unambiguously

that both a and b ideally amphipathic LK peptides are

layingflat on the interface between water and lipids

includingthose of S melliferum [44] In the same conditions,

scr-LK15(W14) and LK16W15(3.0) exhibited a mainly

a-helical folding, without amphipathy, and a slightly tilted

orientation with respect to the lipid/water interface plane

[44] Such a flat orientation should thus be considered the

most stable one for LK peptides, even if other orientations are possible (see below) As suggested by the carpet model, aggregation on the membrane surface should enhance peptide dynamic reorientations and the subsequent forma-tion of transient transmembrane pores [51]

Amongthe different mechanisms proposed to explain peptide action on membranes, the interfacial models such as

rafts or carpets [28,52,53] thus seem to be more relevant to polycationic amphipathic molecules than the barrel-stave model This view is strongly supported by the data of Table 4 and Fig 5 showing that the activity of the LK peptides is essentially independent of membrane thickness Indeed, the helical 15-residue peptides are the most active ones independent of the mollicute species and, for the same peptide, independent of the membrane thickness, whilst the formation of transmembrane bundles of helices would require longer molecules for a better match between membrane thickness and peptide length Hence, the anti-bacterial action of these peptides comprises four main steps: step 1, interfacial partitioningand exofacial accumulation of

Fig 5 Graphical illustration of the effects on antibacterial activity of the length of alpha-amphi series peptides vs A laidlawii membrane thick-ness Antibacterial activities are expressed as MIC)1 The data were normalized in such a way that the highest activity, corresponding to a MIC of 0.78 l , was given a value of 100.

Trang 9

monomers on the target membrane (limiting step); step 2,

peptide structural changes (conformation, aggregation, and

orientation) induced by interactions with the lipid bilayer, as

indicated by previous studies with liposomes and

erythro-cytes [17,25]; step 3, plasma membrane permeabilization/

depolarization via detergent-like effects; step 4, rapid

bacterial cell death if the extent of depolarization is

maintained above a critical threshold At step 3, bound

peptides can modifiy the membrane curvature stress above a

certain peptide/lipid ratio which should also contribute to

their toxicity (see for example [54]) Steps 3 and 4

(permeabilization and physiological consequences,

respect-ively) are identical to those induced by ion-channel forming

peptides such as alamethicin although the molecular

mechanisms of permeabilization (step 3) differ Whilst for

alamethicin and analogues there is strong evidence that

membrane permeabilization is due to the formation of

dynamic barrel-staves [35,48], carpet-formingpeptides

behave rather like detergents disrupting the lipid bilayer

when a threshold concentration of peptide monomer is

reached; at this stage, transient transmembrane pores might

be formed [53] Some cationic peptides such as magainin are

also capable of formingtransient toroidal pores composed

of dynamic, peptid/lipid supramolecular complexes [55]

Whatever the permeabilization mechanism, a sudden

membrane depolarization should prevent bacteria from

settingup appropriate countermeasures and lead to a rapid

cell death if the peptide concentration is maintained above a

critical threshold In the case of bacteria like mollicutes

which are devoid of a cell wall (murein), cell death can occur

still faster upon the action of the most efficient peptides

since in this case massive entry of water into the cytoplasm

can lead to cell burst

Mechanisms other than membrane permeabilization have

also been proposed to explain the antimicrobial activity of

some cationic peptides In some cases, the inhibition of

intracellular proteins might indeed be responsible for

bacterial cell death (see for example [56,57] for brief

discussions) We believe that these different views are not

contradictory but rather reflect, even for a same peptide,

differences in the context of its action, the variables (notably

the properties of the target cell) being probably too many to

allow for a single and general mechanism of action

Acknowledgements

We are pleased to thank Dr K Bu¨tner, now at Neosystem, for kindly

providingpeptides and W Ne´ri for peptide purification.

This work was supported by the GDR CNRS 790 (Peptides et

Prote´ines Membranotropes) and the Ministe`re de lEnseignement

Supe´rieur et de la Recherche’ (ACC Physico-Chimie des Membranes

Biologiques and the Programme de Recherche Fondamentale en

Microbiologie et Maladies Infectieuses et Parasitaires).

References

1 Segrest, J.P (1977) Amphipathic helixes and plasma lipoproteins:

thermodynamic and geometric considerations Chem Phys Lipids

18, 7–22.

2 De Grado, W.F., Ke´zdy, F.J & Kaiser, E.T (1981) Design,

synthesis and characterization of a cytotoxic peptide with

melittin-like activity J Am Chem Soc 103, 679–681.

3 Eisenberg, D (1984) Three-dimensional structure of membrane and surface proteins Annu Rev Biochem 53, 595–623.

4 Segrest, J.P., de Loof, H., Dohlman, J.G., Brouillette, C.G & Anantharamaiah, G.M (1990) Amphipathic helix motif: classes and properties Proteins 8, 103–117.

5 De Grado, W.F., Musso, G.F., Lieber, M., Kaiser, E.T & Ke´zdy, F.J (1982) Kinetics and mechanism of hemolysis induced by melittin and by a synthetic melittin analogue Biophys J 37, 329–338.

6 Cornut, I., Thiaudie`re, E & Dufourcq, J (1993) The amphipathic helix in cytotoxic peptides In The Amphipathic Helix (Epand R.M., ed.), pp 173–219 CRC Press, Boca Raton.

7 Saberwal, G & Nagaraj, R (1994) Cell-lytic and antibacterial peptides that act by perturbingthe barrier function of membranes: facets of their conformational features, structure-function corre-lations and membrane-perturbingabilities Biochim Biophys Acta

1197, 109–131.

8 Merrifield, R.B., Boman, H.G., Andreu, D., Li, Z.Q., Fink, J & Wade, D (1990) The cecropins: an exemple of the use of peptide synthesis to study a biochemical problem In Peptides (Giralt, E & Andreu, D., eds), p.3 ESCOM, Leiden.

9 De Grado, W.F (1999) De novo design of antibacterial beta-peptides J Am Chem Soc 121, 122000–122201.

10 Porter, E.A., Wang, X., Lee, H.-S., Weisblum, B & Gellman, S.H (2000) Non-haemolytic beta-amino-acid oligomers Nature 404, 565.

11 De Grado, W.F & Lear, J.D (1985) Induction of peptide conformation at a polar/water interfaces A study with model peptides of defined hydrophobic periodicity J Am Chem Soc.

107, 7684–7689.

12 Lee, S., Mihara, H., Aoyagi, H., Kato, T., Izumiya, N & Yamasaki, N (1986) Relationship between antimicrobial activity and amphiphilic property of basic model peptides Biochim Bio-phys Acta 862, 211–219.

13 Alouf, J.E., Dufourcq, J., Siffert, O., Thiaudie`re, E & Geoffroy,

C (1989) Interaction of staphylococcal delta-toxin and synthetic analogues with erythrocytes and phospholipid vesicles Biological and physical properties of the amphipathic peptides Eur J Bio-chem 183, 381–390.

14 Dathe, M., Schumann, M., Wieprecht, T., Winkler, A., Beyer-mann, M., Krause, E., Matsuzaki, K., Murase, O & Bienert,

M (1996) Peptide helicity and membrane surface charge mod-ulate the balance of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions with lipid bilayers and biological membranes Biochemistry 35, 12612–12622.

15 Blondelle, S.E & Houghten, R.A (1992) Design of model amphipathic peptides havingpotent antimicrobial activities Biochemistry 31, 12688–12694.

16 Reynaud, J.A., Grivet, J.P., Sy, D & Trudelle, Y (1993) Inter-actions of basic amphiphilic peptides with dimyristoylphos-phatidylcholine small unilamellar vesicles: optical, NMR, and electron microscopy studies and conformational calculations Biochemistry 32, 4997–5008.

17 Cornut, I., Bu¨ttner, K., Dasseux, J.L & Dufourcq, J (1994) The amphipathic a-helix concept Application to the de novo design of ideally amphipathic Leu, Lys peptides with hemolytic activity higher than that of melittin FEBS Lett 349, 29–33.

18 Brack, A & Spach, G (1981) Multiconformational synthetic polypeptides J Am Chem Soc 103, 6319–6323.

19 Blondelle, S.E., Ostrech, J.M., Houghten, R.A & Pe´rez-Paya, E (1995) Induced conformational states of amphipathic peptides in aqueous/lipid environments Biophys J 68, 351–359.

20 Cornut, I., Bu¨ttner, K., Be´ven, L., Duclohier, H & Dufourcq, J (1994) Minimal requirements for the design of highly cytotoxic alpha-helical amphipathic peptides In Peptides 1994 – Proceedings

Trang 10

of the 23 European Peptide Symposium (Maia, H.L.S., ed.), pp.

666–667 ESCOM, Leiden.

21 Castano, S., Desbat, B & Dufourcq, J (2000) Ideally amphipathic

b-sheeted peptides at interfaces: structure, orientation, affinities for

lipids and hemolytic activity of (KL) m K peptides Biochim

Bio-phys Acta 1463, 65–80.

22 Kiyota, T., Lee, S & Sugihara, G.V (1996) Design and

synthesis of amphiphilic alpha-helical model peptides with

systematically varied hydrophobic-hydrophilic balance and their

interaction with lipid- and bio-membranes Biochemistry 35,

13196–13204.

23 Dathe, M., Wieprecht, T., Nikolenko, H., Handel, L., Maloy,

M.L., McDonald, D.L., Beyermann, M & Bienert, M (1997)

Hydrophobicity, hydrophobic moment and angle subtended by

charged residues modulate antibacterial and haemolytic activity of

amphipathic helical peptides FEBS Lett 403, 208–212.

24 Castano, S., Desbat, B., Laguerre, M & Dufourcq, J (1999)

Structure, orientation and affinity for interfaces and lipids of

ideally amphipathic lytic L i K j (i ¼ 2j) peptides Biochim Biophys.

Acta 1416, 176–194.

25 Castano, S., Cornut, I., Bu¨ttner, K., Dasseux, J.L & Dufourcq, J.

(1999) The amphipathic helix concept: length effects on ideally

L i K j (i ¼ 2j) peptides to acquire optimal hemolytic activity

Bio-chim Biophys Acta 1416, 161–175.

26 McLean, L.R., Haganan, K.A., Owen, T.J & Krstenansky, J.L.

(1991) Minimal peptide length for interaction of amphipathic

alpha-helical peptides with phosphatidylcholine liposomes

Bio-chemistry 30, 31–37.

27 Bechinger, B (1997) Structure and functions of channel-forming

peptides: magainins, cecropins, melittin and alamethicin.

J Membr Biol 156, 197–211.

28 Shai, Y (1999) Mechanism of binding, insertion and

destabiliza-tion of phospholipid bilayer membranes by alpha-helical

anti-microbial and cell non-selective membrane-lytic peptides Biochim.

Biophys Acta 1462, 55–70.

29 Razin, S (1992) Peculiar properties of mycoplasmas: the smallest

self-replicatingprocaryotes FEMS Microbiol Lett 100, 423–

432.36.

30 Be´ven, L & Wro´blewski, H (1997) Effect of natural amphipathic

peptides on viability, membrane potential, cell shape, and motility

of mollicutes Res Microbiol 148, 163–175.

31 Silvius, J.R & McElhaney, R.N (1978) Lipid compositional

manipulation in Acholeplasma laidlawii B Effect of exogenous

fatty acids on fatty acid composition and cell growth when

endogenous fatty acid production is inhibited Can J Biochem.

56, 462–469.

32 Thurmond, R.L., Niemi, A.R., Lindblom, G., Wieslander, A˚ &

Rilfors, L (1994) Membrane thickness and molecular orderingin

Acholeplasma laidlawii strain A studied by 2H NMR

spectro-scopy Biochemistry 33, 13178–13188.

33 Be´ven, L., Chaloin, L., Vidal, P., Heitz, F & Wro´blewski, H.

(1997) Effects on mollicutes (wall-less bacteria) of synthetic

pep-tides comprisinga signal peptide or a membrane fusion peptide,

and a nuclear localization sequence (NLS): a comparison with

melittin Biochim Biophys Acta 1329, 357–369.

34 Be´ven, L., Duval, D., Rebuffat, S., Riddell, F.G., Bodo, B &

Wro´blewski, H (1998) Membrane permeabilisation and

anti-mycoplasmic activity of the 18-residue peptaibols, trichorzins PA.

Biochim Biophys Acta 1372, 78–90.

35 Be´ven, L., Helluin, O., Molle, G., Duclohier, H & Wro´blewski, H.

(1999) Correlation between anti-bacterial activity and pore sizes

of two classes of voltage-dependent channel-forming peptides.

Biochim Biophys Acta 1421, 53–63.

36 Waggoner, A.S (1979) Dye indicators of membrane potential.

Ann Rev Biophys Bioeng 8, 47–68.

37 Chitarra, L.G., Breeuwer, P., Van den Bulk, R.W & Abee, T (2000) Rapid fluorescence assessment of intracellular pH as a viability indicator of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp Michiga-nensis J Appl Microbiol 88, 809–816.

38 Smith, P.K., Krohn, R.I., Hermanson, G.T., Mallia, A.K., Gartner, F.H., Provenzano, M.D., Fujimuto, E.K., Goeke, N.M.

& Klenk, D.C (1985) Measurement of protein usingbicinchoninic acid Anal Biochem 150, 76–85.

39 Wade, D., Andreu, D., Mitchell, S.A., Silveira, A.M., Boman, A., Boman, H.G & Merrifield, R.B (1992) Antibacterial peptides designed as analogs or hybrids of cecropins and melittin Int J Pept Protein Res 40, 429–436.

40 Juvvadi, P., Vunnam, S., Merrifield, E.L., Boman, H.G & Mer-rifield, R.B (1996) Hydrophobic effects on antibacterial and channel-formingproperties of cecropin A-melittin hybrids J Pept Sci 2, 223–232.

41 Dathe, M & Wieprecht, T (1999) Structural features of helical antimicrobial peptides: their potential to modulate activity on model membranes and biological cells Biochim Biophys Acta

1462, 71–87.

42 Oren, Z & Shai, Y (2000) Cyclization of a cytolytic amphipathic alpha-helical peptide and its diastereomer: effect on structure, interaction with model membranes, and biological function Biochemistry 39, 6103–6114.

43 Feder, R., Dagan, A & Mor, A (2000) Structure-activity relationship study of antimicrobial dermaseptin S4 showingthe consequences of peptide oligomerization on selective cytotoxicity.

J Biol Chem 275, 4230–4238.

44 Castano, S., Desbat, B., Wro´blewski, H & Dufourcq, J (2002) Hemolytic and antibacterial activities of LK peptides of various topologies: a monolayer and PM-IRRAS approach In Mem-branes and Proteins (Templer, R.H & Leatherbarrow, R., eds), pp 191–198 Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference of Biophysical Chemistry, London, 2001.

45 Wang, Y., Agerberth, B., Lothgren, A., Almstedt, A & Johansson, J (1998) Apolipoprotein A-I binds and inhibits the human antibacterial/cytotoxic peptide LL-37 J Biol Chem 293, 33115–33118.

46 Sorensen, O., Bratt, T., Johnsen, A.H., Madsen, M.T & Borre-gaard, N (1999) The human antibacterial cathelicidin, hCAP-18

is bound to lipoproteins in plasma J Biol Chem 294, 22445– 22451.

47 Nir-Paz, R., Pre´vost, M.-C., Nicolas, P., Blanchard, A & Wro´blewski, H (2002) Susceptibility of Mycoplasma fermentans and Mycoplasma hyorhinis to membrane-active peptides and enrofloxacin in human tissue cell cultures Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46, 1218–1225.

48 Duclohier, H & Wro´blewski, H (2001) Voltage-dependent pore formation and antimicrobial activity by alamethicin and ana-logues J Membr Biol 184, 1–12.

49 Vog t, B., Ducarme, P., Schinzel, S., Brasseur, R & Beching er, B (2000) The topology of lysine-containing amphipathic peptides in bilayers by circular dichroism, solid-state NMR, and molecular modeling Biophys J 79, 2644–2656.

50 Escrive, C & Laguerre, M (2001) Molecular dynamics simula-tions of the insertion of two ideally amphipathic lytic peptides LK(15) and LK(9) in a 1,2-dimyristoylphosphatidyl-choline monolayer Biochim Biophys Acta 1513, 63–74.

51 Raghunathan, G., Seetharamulu, P., Brooks, B.R & Guy, H.R (1990) Models of d-hemolysin membrane channels and crystal structures Proteins 8, 213–225.

52 Bechinger, B (1999) The structure, dynamics and orientation of antimicrobial peptides in membranes by multidimensional solid-state NMR spectroscopy Biochim Biophys Acta 1462, 157–183.

Ngày đăng: 23/03/2014, 17:21

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm