1. Trang chủ
  2. » Giáo án - Bài giảng

One pot green synthesis of m-aminophenol–urea–glyoxal resin as pipette tip solid-phase extraction adsorbent for simultaneous determination of four plant hormones in watermelon

8 10 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề One Pot Green Synthesis of m-Aminophenol–Urea–Glyoxal Resin as Pipette Tip Solid-Phase Extraction Adsorbent for Simultaneous Determination of Four Plant Hormones in Watermelon
Tác giả Yanke Lu, Pengfei Li, Chunliu Yang, Yehong Han, Hongyuan Yan
Trường học Hebei University
Chuyên ngành Analytical Chemistry
Thể loại research article
Năm xuất bản 2020
Thành phố Baoding
Định dạng
Số trang 8
Dung lượng 2,55 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Plant hormones (PHs) are a type of pesticide that can potentially affect human health. Therefore, their quantitative detection is particularly important. In this study, a green and economic method for the simultaneous extraction and determination of four PHs, namely thidiazuron, forchlorfenuron, 1-naphthylacetic acid, and 2-naphthoxyacetic acid.

Trang 1

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chroma

Yanke Lua, Pengfei Lia, Chunliu Yanga, ∗, Yehong Hanb, Hongyuan Yana, b, ∗

a Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Diagnosis of Ministry of Education, College of Public Health, Hebei University, Baoding 071002,

China

b Key Laboratory of Analytical Science and Technology of Hebei Province, College of pharmacy, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China

a r t i c l e i n f o

Article history:

Received 16 March 2020

Revised 3 May 2020

Accepted 5 May 2020

Available online 8 May 2020

Keywords:

One pot fabrication

Resin adsorbent

Pipette tip solid-phase extraction

Plant hormones

Watermelon juice

a b s t r a c t

Plant hormones (PHs) are a type of pesticide that can potentially affect human health Therefore, their quantitative detection is particularly important In this study, a green and economic method for the simultaneous extraction and determination of fourPHs, namely thidiazuron, forchlorfenuron, 1-naphthylacetic acid, and 2-naphthoxyacetic acid, in watermelon juice was developed by using m-aminophenol–urea–glyoxalresinastheadsorbentforpipettetipsolidphaseextraction(PT-SPE)coupled withliquidchromatography.Theresin wassynthesizedviaasimple(one pot hydrothermalsynthesis) andgreen(ethanolasthesolventandglyoxalascrosslinkingagent)process.Thesynthesizedresin pos-sessesmultiplefunctionalgroups(hydroxyl,amino,andimino,amongothers),highadsorptioncapacity, largerspecific surfaceareathanthe urea–glyoxalresin and m-aminophenol–glyoxalresin,and can be regeneratedeasily.ThePT-SPEdeviceissimple,cheap,andeasytoobtain,andtheadsorbentdosageis only5.0mg.Theproposedmethodhasawidelineardetectionrange,highrecovery,goodprecision,and highsensitivity,and satisfiesthemeasurementrequirementsfordetecting tracelevelsofPHsinfruits andvegetables

© 2020 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved

1 Introduction

Sample preparation, as a key step in modern analysis, plays an

important role in the entire analysis process Currently, the devel-

opment of new, economical, fast, and high-throughput sample pre-

treatment methods is still an urgent issue in the analytical field

Sample pretreatment technologies include solid-phase extraction

(SPE) [1], solid-phase microextraction [ 2, 3], liquid–liquid extraction

[4], matrix solid-phase dispersion [5], dispersive liquid–liquid mi-

croextraction [6], pipette tip SPE (PT-SPE) [7] Among them, SPE

and methods derived therefrom are the most widely used tech-

nologies, especially the PT-SPE method have received widespread

attention from researchers because of its advantages of low cost,

small dead volume, longer flow path, and low consumption of the

adsorbent and organic solvent [8] However, SPE and related meth-

ods are dependent on the adsorption performance of the adsor-

∗ Corresponding authors at: Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry and Molec-

ular Diagnosis of Ministry of Education, College of Public Health, Hebei University,

Baoding 071002, China

E-mail addresses: yangchunliu@hbu.edu.cn (C Yang), yanhy@hbu.edu.cn (H Yan)

bent; therefore it is necessary to explore new adsorbents with ex- cellent adsorption and purification abilities

Phenolic resin, as a commercial synthetic resin, is widely used

in a variety of fields, including in adsorbent owing to its low cost, easy availability, and simple preparation procedure [ 9, 10] Phenol– formaldehyde resins are conventionally utilized, but formaldehyde, used as the crosslinker, is carcinogenic Therefore, researchers have attempted to find alternative crosslinking agents, such as glu- taraldehyde, glyoxylic acid, hexamethylenetetramine, and glyoxal [11–15] Although the toxic side effects of the aforementioned ad- sorbents to the human body are relatively low, the functional groups of the phenolic resin are still limited as only phenolic hy- droxyl groups are present in these resins, which in turn affects the adsorption ability Therefore, the development of new multifunc- tional phenolic resin adsorbents has become a hot research topic Plant hormones (PHs) are widely used in modern agriculture

to increase crop yields [16–23] Thidiazuron (TDZ), forchlorfenuron (CPPU), 1-naphthylacetic acid (NAA), and 2-naphthoxyacetic acid (BNOA), as PHs, regulate watermelon growth, and have been widely used in different periods [ 24, 25] Currently, watermelon juice has become one of the most popular fruit drinks in the sum- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461214

0021-9673/© 2020 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved

Trang 2

glyoxal resin (MAPGR) and urea–glyoxal resin (UGR) are also syn-

thesized, and the adsorption capacity of the three adsorbents is

compared A small PT-SPE cartridge is assembled by using a pipette

tip, degreased cotton, and rubber suction bulb Finally, a method

based on MAPUGR −PT-SPE coupled with high performance liquid

chromatography (HPLC) for detecting these four PHs in watermelon

juice is established by utilizing the optimized extraction parame-

ters

2 Experimental section

2.1 Reagents and instruments

The details are displayed in the Supplementary material.

2.2 Synthesis of MAPUGR, MAPGR, and UGR

Synthesis of MAPUGR: Aminophenol (30 mmol), urea

(10 mmol), PEG 60 0 0 (0.015 mmol), and anhydrous ethanol

(50 mL) were added to a flask (100 mL) and stirred until thor-

oughly mixed Glyoxal (30 mmol) was added, and pH of the

solvent was adjusted to 9.0 with NaOH solution, the resulting

solution was stirred at 50 °C for 3 h After heating at 75 °C for

24 h, the solid product was washed with methanol and water, and

then dried at 40 °C to obtain MAPUGR

Synthesis of MAPGR: Aminophenol (40 mmol), PEG 60 0 0

(0.015 mmol), and anhydrous ethanol (50 mL) were added to

a flask (100 mL) and stirred until thoroughly mixed Glyoxal

(30 mmol) was added and the pH of the system was adjusted to

9.0 with NaOH solution; the resulting solution was stirred at 50 °C

for 3 h After heating at 75 °C for 24 h, the resulting solid product

was washed with methanol and water, and then dried at 40 °C to

obtain MAPGR

Synthesis of UGR: Urea (40 mmol), PEG 60 0 0 (0.015 mmol), and

anhydrous ethanol (50 mL) were added to a flask (100 mL) and

stirred until thoroughly mixed Glyoxal (30 mmol) was added, the

pH of the system was adjusted to acidic with HCl solution, the re-

sulting solution was stirred at 50 °C for 3 h After heating at 75 °C

for 24 h, the obtained solid product was washed with methanol

and water, and then dried at 40 °C to obtain UGR

2.3 Preparation of watermelon juice

Watermelon samples were randomly purchased from the local

supermarkets in Baoding China First, the watermelons were ho-

mogenized with a homogenizer after peeling The supernatant was

obtained after centrifugation at 10 0 0 0 rpm for 10 min to remove

the solid residues, and the supernatant was stored frozen in a re-

frigerator Finally, the samples were passed through a 0.45 μm fil-

ter for further work

Fig 1 Assembly and operation process of MAPUGR −PT-SPE

2.4 Procedure for MAPUGR −PT-SPE

The PT-SPE was assembled from two pipette tips, degreased cotton and the adsorbent, as shown in Fig.1 First, degreased cot- ton was inserted into the exit of the 200 μL pipette tip to avoid loss of the adsorbent Thereafter 5.0 mg of MAPUGR was added to the 200 μL pipette tip The top of the adsorbent was then covered with degreased cotton A 1.0 mL pipette tip that was cut off was connected to the 200 μL pipette tip filled with adsorbent The final height of the adsorbent in the PT-SPE was approximately 10 mm After activating MAPUGR with 2.0 mL of methanol and water, wa- termelon juice (1.0 mL) at pH 3.0 was loaded onto the cartridge, washed with water (1.0 mL), and eluted with methanol (1.0 mL) The tip of a rubber suction bulb was tightly inserted into the top

of the pipette tip The pressure above the sample solution was con- trolled by squeezing the rubber suction bulb through a clamp fixed

on an iron stand to control the flow rate The eluate was collected, dried under nitrogen, and then re-dissolved in 1.0 mL of the mo- bile phase for HPLC analysis

2.5 HPLC conditions

Chromatographic separation was performed on an LC–20A high performance liquid chromatograph equipped with an LC–20AT sol- vent delivery unit and an SPD −20A ultraviolet detector (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) A Labsolution workstation was used for data ac- quisition (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) An Eclipse XDB–C 18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 mm) was purchased from Agilent Tech Co., Ltd (California, United States) The wavelength of the detection was set

at 224 nm The mobile phase comprised water-acetonitrile (72:28, v/v, containing 0.1% TFA) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min −1 The col- umn temperature was maintained at 40 °C, and the injection vol- ume was 20 μL

2.6 Statistical analysis

The confidence interval is represented by an error bar Because comparisons among three or more sample means were to be per- formed, one-way analyses of variance and multiple comparison

Student −Newman −Keuls (SNK- q) were selected to analyze the sig-

Trang 3

Fig 2 Schematic illustration of MAPUGR synthesis

nificant differences Mean values were considered to have a signif-

icant difference when the significance test value ( P) < 0.05

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Synthesis of MAPUGR, MAPGR, and UGR

The purpose of the MAPUGR adsorbent synthesized herein was

to extract and isolate four PHs in watermelon juice An attempt

was made to synthesize the resin using m-aminophenol and urea

with glyoxal to meet the requirements for pretreatment of the

complex sample The synthesis process and reaction principle of

the adsorbent are shown in Fig 2 The methylolated intermedi-

ate was first formed from m-aminophenol, urea and glyoxal in

ethanol After increasing the temperature, the intermediate poly-

condensed and solidified, and PEG 60 0 0 was also uniformly fixed

in the solid product After washing the product with methanol

and water, the unreacted monomers, crosslinker, and porogen in

the solid product were removed, and the spatial arrangement of

the MAPUGR structure was maintained by vacuum drying The

hydrophilic groups of m-aminophenol and urea were retained in

the product, which provided numerous adsorption sites and en-

hanced the hydrophilicity of the sorbent Glyoxal containing two

aldehyde groups provides adequate reaction sites, and was used as

a crosslinking agent in the synthesis of MAPUGR PEG 60 0 0, as a

porogen and structure-directing agent, plays an important role in

the formation of the three-dimensional porous structure of MA-

PUGR Anhydrous ethanol, as the reaction solvent in this experi-

ment, does not exert the toxic effects of organic solvents on the

human body and the environment, and thus enables green synthe-

sis of the polymer

3.2 Characteristics of MAPUGR, MAPGR, and UGR

Fig.3A shows the scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of

MAPGR, which revealed that the product formed by the reaction

of m-aminophenol with glyoxal had a non-uniform particle size

with close adhesion of the components The average particle size

of the individual microspheres was 3 −5 μm, and the particle size

of the adhesion structure was 5 −30μm The SEM image of UGR in

Fig.3B shows a sheet-like adhesion structure with a particle size

of 2–30 μm The SEM image of MAPUGR in Fig.3C shows the over-

all three-dimensional porous structure formed by the aggregation

of multiple microspheres The microspheres/microspheres junction

may be producted by the reaction of glyoxal with urea The size of

the individual microspheres is 1–3 μm, but the overall particle size

is 30–100 μm The particle size of MAPUGR satisfies the applica- tion range of SPE, and the solid layer formed by the aggregation of the microspheres in the three-dimensional network structure en- sures that MAPUGR is in sufficient contact with the sample solu- tion when loaded into the PT-SPE device

The functional groups of MAPUGR, MAPGR and UGR were con- firmed by Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry (FT–IR) Broad adsorption peaks were found at 3342 and 3232 cm −1 due to the

N –H and O –H telescopic vibrations, and the peak of the C –H stretching vibration was appeared at 2973 cm −1 Furthermore, the stretching vibration of the C =O group of urea was observed at

1689 cm −1 , and the peaks associated with the C = C group in the m- aminophenol benzene ring skeleton were observed at 1612, 1493, and 1460 cm −1 The peaks at 1304, 1203, 1161, and 1105 cm −1 were attributed to C –O and C –N tensile vibrations Finally, the sig- nals at 809 and 766 cm −1 were attributed to the out-of-plane bending vibration of C –H in the aromatic ring, respectively These results indicate that the amino and phenolic hydroxyl groups in m- aminophenol, the carbonyl group in urea, and the hydroxyl group from the reaction of urea and glyoxal were successfully introduced into MAPUGR

The surface area and pore characteristics are listed in Table S1 The average pore diameters of MAPUGR, MAPGR, and UGR were 96.42, 131.54, and 176.86 ˚A, respectively The surface area of MA- PUGR is 2.02 and 1.67 times that of MAPGR and UGR, respectively The adhesion of MAPGR results in a small specific surface area However, during the synthesis of MAPUGR, the addition of urea effectively prevented the adhesion of MAPGR; therefore, the syn- thesized MAPUGR had a high specific surface area

3.3 Evaluation of adsorption behavior

The adsorption capacity of MAPGR, UGR and MAPUGR for the four PHs was evaluated by adding 2.0 mL of solution (30.0 μg mL −1 of the analytes) to a 10 mL centrifuge tube con- taining 3.0 mg of adsorbent As shown in Fig 4A, MAPUGR had

a higher adsorption capacity for the four PHs than MAPGR and UGR ( P < 0.05) This further confirmed that the addition of urea during the preparation procedure enhanced the adsorptive inter- actions with the analytes and increased the surface area, which improved the adsorption capacity of MAPUGR The experimental steps for evaluating the adsorption kinetics are presented in the

Supplementary material As shown in Fig S1, the adsorption capac- ity of MAPUGR for TDZ, CPPU and BNOA could exceed 45% of the adsorption capacity at adsorption equilibrium, and the adsorption capacity of NAA could exceed 33% of the adsorption capacity at adsorption equilibrium within 5 min Therefore, the mass trans-

Trang 4

four PHs

3.4 Optimization of the MAPUGR −PT-SPE process

The molecular forms of the compounds may be affected by the

sample pH, which has an effect on the recovery of the four PHs

When the sample pH is less than the pKa, the analytes are pre-

dominantly in the molecular or protonated form, which facilitates

adsorption of the analytes by the adsorbent The pKa values of TDZ,

CPPU, NAA, and BNOA were 8.86, 8.40, 4.26, and 4.75, respectively,

and pH of the watermelon juice was 5.63; thus, the sample pH was

adjusted in the range from 2.0 to 7.0 with 1 M HCl and 1 M NaOH

Fig.4B shows that pH had a strong influence on the adsorption of

NAA and BNOA ( P < 0.05), but had little effect on TDZ and CPPU

( P > 0.05) Therefore, the sample pH was optimized to 3.0

The loading volumes (1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 mL) of the sam-

ples were studied Fig 4C shows that the loss rate of the ana-

lytes gradually increased ( P < 0.05) with increasing loading vol-

ume, which indicates that limited adsorption could be achieved

with 5.0 mg of the adsorbent, and dynamic adsorption equilibrium

was not reached Considering the extraction speed and efficiency,

a loading volume of 1.0 mL was used for further work The wash-

ing solvent can effectively remove interfering substances Thus,

1.0 mL of water, methanol–water (1:9, v/v), acetonitrile–water (1:9,

v/v), acetone–water (1:9, v/v), water–hydrochloric acid (pH 3), and

water–acetic acid (pH 3) were studied as the washing agent As

shown in Fig.4D, there was almost no loss of the analytes when

water–hydrochloric acid (pH 3) or water was used as the wash-

ing agent ( P > 0.05) Considering the purification effect and cost,

1.0 mL of water was used for the subsequent work Six eluents

were studied for elution of the analytes from MAPUGR; the results

presented in Fig 4E show that the recovery of four PHs was the

highest when methanol was used as eluent ( P < 0.05) The effect

of different eluent volumes (0.20, 0.40, 0.60, 0.80, 1.0, and 1.2 mL)

on the analyte recovery was also investigated As shown in Fig.4F,

the optimal recovery was achieved when the eluent volume was

1.0 mL ( P > 0.05)

3.5 Comparison with commercial adsorbents

A spiked recovery experiment was used to evaluate the extrac-

tion efficiency of MAPUGR and seven commercial adsorbents (C 18 ,

HLB, MCX, PSA, SCX, silica gel, and MAX) for the four PHs in wa-

termelon samples The procedure for MAPUGR–PT-SPE was per-

formed as described in the Experimental Section, and the extrac-

tion conditions for HLB, MCX, C 18 , PSA, SCX, silica, and MAX are

described in previous studies [32–35]; the results are presented in

Fig.5and Fig S2 MAPUGR had higher recoveries for the four PHs

than the commercial adsorbents ( P < 0.05) MCX provided excel-

lent recovery ( >80%) because it is a cation exchange and reverse-

bents (MAX, PSA) presented low recoveries for the PHs, indicating that the cation exchange and reverse-phase dual-retention play an important role in the adsorption process In addition, the recovery

of SCX, dominated by ππ bonds, was low ( <32%), which proves that ππ bonds are not the main force between the analytes and adsorbent This phenomenon is attributed to the large number of hydroxyl groups, amino groups, and imino groups on the surface

of the adsorbent, which sterically hinder ππ bonding However, the weakly polar analytes were minimally adsorbed on the polar adsorbents (silica, PSA) in aqueous medium, whereas higher re- covery for the analytes was achieved with the strongly nonpolar adsorbent (C 18 ), indicating that the nonpolar interactions with the analytes play an important role Finally, more than 92% of the four PHs was recovered with HLB, which proves that the hydrophilic- ity and hydrogen bonding of the adsorbent contribute significantly

to the adsorption of the PHs Overall, MAPUGR undergoes multi- ple adsorptive interactions with the analytes due to its excellent hydrophilicity

3.6 Adsorbent regeneration

The reusability of MAPUGR was investigated by an adsorption- desorption cycle experiment by following the procedure described

in the Experimental Section The concentration of the spiked solu- tion was 5.00 μg mL −1 When the MAPUGR–PT-SPE process was completed, the cartridge was cleaned with 2.0 mL of methanol and water, respectively, before the next cycle The recovery was still higher than 92% after 6 cycles, which indicates that MAPUGR has good reusability The entire process only uses water and methanol, which extends the life of the adsorbent and makes it easy to re- generate

3.7 Validation of MAPUGR–PT-SPE–HPLC method

The proposed method was validated by determining its linear- ity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantitation (LOQ), repeatabil- ity, accuracy and precision; the results are summarized in Table1

A good linearity curve was obtained in the range of 0.020 0/0.050 0

5.00 μg mL −1 for the four PHs (seven spiked levels of the analytes) with a correlation coefficient ( 2 ) ≥ 0.9998 The LOD and LOQ cal- culated for the signal-to-noise ratios (S/N) of 3 and 10 were 10.9, 14.4, 3.61, and 4.77 ng mL −1 , and 36.3, 48.1, 12.0, and 15.9 ng mL −1 for TDZ, CPPU, NAA, and BNOA, respectively The precision of the developed method was evaluated by repeatedly analyzing the sam- ple solution (5.00 μg mL −1 ) three times on the same day ( n= 3) and on three consecutive days The intra-day and inter-day pre- cisions are expressed as the relative standard deviations (RSDs) were in the range of 2.5–3.3% and 2.1–7.7%, respectively Finally, the recovery determined at three spiking levels (0.050 0, 0.50 0, and 5.00 μg mL −1 ) was 87.2–102.3% with RSDs of 1.6–7.2% ( Table2)

Trang 5

Fig 4 Comparison of adsorbents (A) and optimization of MAPUGR–PT-SPE (B–F)

Table 1

Parameters of the MAPUGR–PT-SPE–HPLC method

Analytes Regression equation r2 Linearity ( μg mL −1 ) LOD (ng mL −1 ) LOQ (ng mL −1 ) RSD (%)

Intra-day Inter-day

Trang 6

Fig 5 Comparison of MAPUGR with commercial adsorbents

Fig 6 Chromatograms of watermelon juice sample (A) and spiked sample (B)

3.8 Simultaneous determination of the four PHs in watermelon juice

MAPUGR −PT-SPE−HPLC was used to analyze the four PHs in

seven watermelon juice samples to verify the utility of the method

CPPU was detected in one of these samples at a concentration of

61.4 ng mL −1 , which is lower than the maximum residual limit

(100 ng mL −1 ) for watermelon set by China in 2016 The chro-

matograms of the watermelon juice sample and spiked sample

(5.00 μg mL −1 ) are shown in Fig.6 As indicated, no interference

peaks appeared near the retention times of the four PHs The above

results confirm that the MAPUGR–PT-SPE–HPLC method has good

isolation and purification effects and can be applied for the simul-

A comparison of the proposed method with other methods for detecting PHs in fruits and vegetables is shown in Table3 The LOD

of the developed method is comparable to or lower than that of SPE–GC and SPE–HPLC, where SPE requires at least 30 mg of ad- sorbent; thus, the consumption of adsorbents and organic reagents

in these methods is obviously large Compared with SPE–HPLC– MS/MS, the developed method has a higher LOD, but the expen- sive instrumentation of HPLC–MS limits its applicability in routine analysis Compared with other methods, PT-SPE as a sample pre- treatment technology has the advantages of requiring less adsor- bent and reagent consumption, while affording high recovery In addition, the developed MAPUGR–PT-SPE–HPLC method does not require special or expensive equipment, and thus can be used as

an effective strategy for the routine detection of PHs in fruits and vegetables

4 Conclusions

A green and economical MAPUGR–PT-SPE–HPLC process was developed for the extraction and determination of four PHs in wa- termelon juice MAPUGR, synthesized via simple one pot precip- itation polymerization, combines the advantages of MAPGR and UGR, increases the specific surface area, enriches surface functional groups and interaction, and changes the framework structure to provide more contact between the adsorbent and analytes The PT- SPE device is simple, cheap, and easy to obtain, and the adsorbent dosage is only 5.0 mg The recovery of four PHs at three spiking levels ranged from 87.2% to 102.3% with an RSD ≤ 7.2%, which

is consistent with the requirements for monitoring PHs in water- melon juice

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing finan- cial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper

The authors declare no competing financial interest

CRediT authorship contribution statement Yanke Lu: Methodology, Conceptualization Pengfei Li: Valida-

tion Chunliu Yang: Visualization, Project administration Yehong

Han: Writing review & editing Hongyuan Yan: Conceptualiza- tion, Methodology, Supervision

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Natural Science Foundationof Hebei Province ( B2018201270, H2019201288), the National Nat-ural Science Foundation of China ( 21575033), the Talent Engi- neering Training Foundation of HebeiProvince( A201802002), and

Trang 7

the Post-graduate’s Innovation Fund Project of Hebei University ( hbu2019ss073)

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461214

References

[1] Y Picó, M Fernández, M.J Ruiz, G Font, Current trends in solid-phase-based extraction techniques for the determination of pesticides in food and envi- ronment, J Biochem Biophys Methods 70 (2007) 117–131, doi: 10.1016/j.jbbm 2006.10.010

[2] A Mehdiniaa, M.O Aziz-Zanjanib, Advances for sensitive, rapid and selec- tive extraction in different configurations of solid-phase microextraction, TrAC Trends Anal Chem 51 (2013) 13–22, doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2013.05.013

[3] J Zhang, W Li, W Zhu, P Qin, M Lu, X Zhang, Y Miao, Z Cai, Mesoporous graphitic carbon nitride@NiCo 2 O 4 nanocomposite as solid phase microextrac- tion coating for sensitive determination of environmental pollutants in hu- man serum sample, Chem Commun 55 (2019) 10019–10022, doi: 10.1039/ C9CC04348A

[4] M.D.L de Castro, F Priego-Capote, Ultrasound assistance to liquid-liquid ex- traction: a debatable analytical tool, Anal Chim Acta 583 (2007) 2–9, doi: 10 1016/j.aca.2006.09.039

[5] A.L Capriotti, C Cavaliere, P Foglia, R Samperi, S Stampachiacchiere, S Ven- tura, A Laganà, Recent advances and developments in matrix solid-phase dis- persion, TrAC Trends Anal Chem 71 (2015) 186–193, doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2015 03.012

[6] M Sajida, K Alhooshanib, Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based bi- nary extraction techniques prior to chromatographic analysis: a review, TrAC Trends Anal Chem 108 (2018) 167–182, doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2018.08.016 [7] S Seidi, M Tajik, M Baharfar, M Rezazadeh, Micro solid-phase extraction (pipette tip and spin column) and thin film solid-phase microextraction: miniaturized concepts for chromatographic analysis, TrAC Trends Anal Chem

118 (2019) 810–827, doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2019.06.036 [8] M Wang, H Zhang, J Jia, D Han, Y Han, H Yan, An extraction method for de- termination of 6-benzyladenine in bean sprout by graphene oxide/polypyrrole composite adsorbent, Food Anal Methods 11 (2018) 1832–1839, doi: 10.1007/ s12161- 018- 1168- 3

[9] K Wang, J Liu, F Zhang, Q Zhang, H Jiang, M Tong, Y Xiao, N.T.S Phan,

F Zhang, Primary amine-functionalized mesoporous phenolic resin-supported palladium nanoparticles as an effective and stable catalyst for water-medium suzuki-miyaura coupling reactions, ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11 (2019) 41238–41244, doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b11459

[10] T Lv, H Yan, J Cao, S Liang, Hydrophilic molecularly imprinted resorcinol −formaldehyde −melamine resin prepared in water with excel- lent molecular recognition in aqueous matrices, Anal Chem 87 (2015) 11084–11091, doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03253

[11] L Liu, Z.H Xie, Q.F Deng, X.X Hou, Z.Y Yuan, One-pot carbonization enrich- ment of nitrogen in microporous carbon spheres for efficient CO 2 capture, J Mater Chem A 5 (2017) 418–425, doi: 10.1039/c6ta09782k

[12] S Deng, G Du, X Li, X Xie, Performance, reaction mechanism, and character- ization of glyoxal-monomethylol urea (G-MMU) resin, Ind Eng Chem Res 53 (2014) 5421–5431, doi: 10.1021/ie404278d

[13] G Zhang, Y Zhou, Z Ding, L Fu, S Wang, Nanosilica-supported thiosemicarbazide-glutaraldehyde polymer for selective Au(III) removal from aqueous solution, RSC Adv 7 (2017) 55215–55223, doi: 10.1039/C7RA10199F [14] Y Xie, M Wang, X Chen, S Wang, D Han, Y Han, H Yan, 3-Aminophenol- glyoxylic acid resin for the determination of triazine herbicides in tomatoes, Anal Chim Acta 1061 (2019) 122–133, doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.01.062 [15] M Wang, H Nie, D Han, X Qiao, H Yan, S Shen, Cauliflower-like resin micro- spheres with tuneable surface roughness as solid-phase extraction adsorbent for efficient extraction and determination of plant growth regulators in cucum- bers, Food Chem 295 (2019) 259–266, doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.05.130 [16] Y Lu, S Song, R Wang, Z Liu, J Meng, A J Sweetman, A Jenkins, R.C Ferrier,

H Li, W Luo, T Wang, Impacts of soil and water pollution on food safety and health risks in China, Environ Int 77 (2015) 5–15, doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.12

010 [17] Q Wang, Z Yang, Industrial water pollution, water environment treatment, and health risks in China, Environ Pollut 218 (2016) 358–365, doi: 10.1016/j envpol.2016.07.011

[18] E.T Rodrigues, M.F Alpendurada, F Ramos, M. Pardal, Environmental and hu- man health risk indicators for agricultural pesticides in estuaries, Ecotox Env- iron Saf 150 (2018) 224–231, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.12.047

[19] G Gong, H Kam, Y Tse, S.M Lee, Cardiotoxicity of forchlorfenuron (CPPU)

in zebrafish (Danio rerio) and H9c2 cardiomyocytes, Chemosphere 235 (2019) 153–162, doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.027

[20] A Orellana-Silla, S Armenta, M de la Guardia, J.V Mercader, F.A Esteve- Turrillas, Development of immunosorbents for the analysis of forchlorfenuron

in fruit juices by ion mobility spectrometry, Anal Bioanal Chem 410 (2018) 5961–5967, doi: 10.10 07/s0 0216- 018- 1213- 5

[21] F Wang, W Zhang, Y Chen, G Xu, Z Deng, H Du, Y Wang, S Zhang, W Zhao, Simultaneous determination of six plant growth regulators in fruits using

Trang 8

[26] X Esparza, E Moyano, J.R Cosialls, M.T Galceran, Determination of

naphthalene-derived compounds in apples by ultra-high performance liquid

chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, Anal Chim Acta 782 (2013) 28–

36, doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.03.067

[27] N Erin, B Afacan, Y Ersoy, F Ercan, M.K Balci, Gibberellic acid, a plant growth

regulator, increases mast cell recruitment and alters substance P levels, Toxi-

cology 254 (2008) 75–81, doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2008.09.020

[28] European Commission, Commission Regulation (EU) No 396/2005 of 23

February 2005 Amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC on maximum residue

levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal

origin http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/eu-pesticides-database/public/

?event=download.MRL , 2005 (accessed 14 April 2020)

[29] United States Environmental Protection Agency, Index to pesticide chem-

ical names, part 180 tolerance information for pesticide chemicals in

food and feed commodities https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi- bin/text- idx?c=

ecfr&sid&1a0ecaf51aa3dba662c9cbf1b4336eaf&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/

40cfr180 _ main _ 02.tpl , 2009 (accessed 14 April 2020)

[30] Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority, Pesticides and vet-

erinary residues http://www.apvma.gov.au/residues/ , 2012 (accessed 14 April

2020)

multiveterinary drug residues in pork meat by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry combined with solid phase extraction, J Sep Sci 35 (2012) 3447–3454, doi: 10.10 02/jssc.20120 0407

[36] Q Lu, J.H Wu, Q.W Yu, Y.Q Feng, Using pollen grains as novel hydrophilic solid-phase extraction sorbents for the simultaneous determination of 16 plant growth regulators, J Chromatogr A 1367 (2014) 39–47, doi: 10.1016/j.chroma 2014.09.071

[37] C Wang, C Ding, Q Wu, X Xiong, Molecularly imprinted polymers with dual template and bifunctional monomers for selective and simultaneous solid- phase extraction and gas chromatographic determination of four plant growth regulators in plant-derived tissues and foods, Food Anal Methods 12 (2019) 1160–1169, doi: 10.1007/s12161- 019- 01455- 1

[38] H Zhang, X Wu, Y Yuan, D Han, F Qiao, H Yan, An ionic liquid functional- ized graphene adsorbent with multiple adsorption mechanisms for pipette-tip solid-phase extraction of auxins in soybean sprouts, Food Chem 265 (2018) 290–297, doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.05.090

Ngày đăng: 25/12/2022, 01:12

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm