1. Trang chủ
  2. » Giáo án - Bài giảng

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen-agarose column: A tag-free and tag-dependent tool for protein purification affinity chromatography

9 1 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề Proliferating cell nuclear antigen-agarose column: A tag-free and tag-dependent tool for protein purification affinity chromatography
Tác giả Muhammad Tehseen, Vlad-Stefan Raducanu, Fahad Rashid, Afnan Shirbini, Masateru Takahashi, Samir M. Hamdan
Trường học King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Chuyên ngành Biological Sciences
Thể loại Research article
Năm xuất bản 2019
Thành phố Thuwal
Định dạng
Số trang 9
Dung lượng 2,05 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Protein purification by affinity chromatography relies primarily on the interaction of a fused-tag to the protein of interest. Here, we describe a tag-free affinity method that employs functional selection interactions to a broad range of proteins.

Trang 1

Muhammad Tehseen1, Vlad-Stefan Raducanu1, Fahad Rashid, Afnan Shirbini,

Masateru Takahashi, Samir M Hamdan∗

King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Division of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Thuwal, 23955, Saudi Arabia

a r t i c l e i n f o

Article history:

Received 2 February 2019

Received in revised form 1 June 2019

Accepted 3 June 2019

Available online 8 June 2019

Keywords:

PCNA

Affinity chromatography

Okazaki fragment

Elution analysis

DNA polymerase

DNA replication

a b s t r a c t Proteinpurificationbyaffinitychromatographyreliesprimarilyontheinteractionofafused-tagtothe proteinofinterest.Here,wedescribeatag-freeaffinitymethodthatemploysfunctionalselection interac-tionstoabroadrangeofproteins.Toachievethis,wecoupledhumanDNA-clampproliferatingcellnuclear antigen(PCNA)thatinteractswithoveronehundredproteinstoanagaroseresin.Wedemonstratethe versatilityofourPCNA-AgarosecolumnatvariouschromatographicstepsbypurifyingPCNA-binding proteinsthatareinvolvedinDNAReplication(DNApolymerase␦,flapendonuclease1andDNAligase1), translesionDNAsynthesis(DNApolymeraseseta,kappaandiota)andgenomestability(p15).Wealso showthecompetenceofthePCNA-Agarosecolumntopurifynon-PCNAbindingproteinsbyfusingthe PCNA-bindingmotifofhumanp21asanaffinitytag.Finally,weestablishthatourPCNA-Agarosecolumn

isasuitableanalyticalmethodforcharacterizingthebindingstrengthofPCNA-bindingproteins.The conservationandhomologyofPCNA-likeclampswillallowfortheimmediateextensionofourmethod

tootherspecies

©2019TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-ND

license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

∗ Corresponding author.

E-mail address: Samir.hamdan@kaust.edu.sa (S.M Hamdan).

1 These authors contributed equally to the work.

Lig-https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2019.06.008

0021-9673/© 2019 The Authors Published by Elsevier B.V This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.

Trang 2

Fig 1.PCNA coupling to various resins(A)Schematic illustration of irreversible coupling of PCNA (N107C-PCNA) with SulfoLink Coupling resin Model of human PCNA was generated using UCSF Chimera from PDB code 1AXC [ 43 ] PCNA subunits are shown in ribbon form in green, yellow and blue The asparagine 107 residue mutation to cysteine is shown in red for one PCNA monomer.(B)Bar chart illustrating the percentage of flow-through, wash and bound fractions of PCNA immobilized through various non-covalent (via Flag and Strep tag) and covalent (via NHS and SulfoLink) chemistries All percentages were calculated from an initial protein amount of 24 mg PCNA and the coupling was performed on 1 ml of each resin as described in the Methods section (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred

to the web version of this article.)

Trang 3

column

 c

c 0

UV (c) dc

UV (c; h, , , ) =h







2 exp

1 2





2

−c−



erfc

1

√ 2





−c−



UV (c; h, , , ) = hexp

−1 2

c − 



2









2erfcx

1

√ 2



 −c−



Trang 4

by:





2







2(Table1).Eluentswereconcentratedto1.5ml andthen

(Table1)(Fig.2B,lane3).ThefractionsthatcontainedallPol␦

Fig 2.Purification of human recombinant Pol␦ from Sf9 insect cells.(A)A simpli-fied procedure for purification of Pol␦.(B)SDS-PAGE gel showing different steps

of purification: Lane 1, lysate; lane 2, flow-through from HisTrap; lane 3, protein eluted from HisTrap; lane 4, flow-through from PCNA-Agarose column; lane 5, Pol␦ elution from PCNA-Agarose column; lane 6, Pol␦ after gel filtration All protein frac-tions were separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and stained with Coomassie blue Size marker (M) (kDa) is on the left side of the gel (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Table2).ThepurifiedPol␦complexwaselutedasasinglepeakon

column

Trang 5

Table 1

Buffers and their composition used in different purification steps (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version

of this article.)

11 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 500 mM NaCl, 30 mM Imidazole, 10 mM ␤-Mercaptoethanol, and 5% Glycerol.

12 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 160 mM NaCl, 30 mM Imidazole, 10 mM ␤-Mercaptoethanol, and 5% Glycerol.

13 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 160 mM NaCl, 500 mM Imidazole, 10 mM ␤-Mercaptoethanol and 5% Glycerol.

15 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 250 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, 10 mM ␤-Mercaptoethanol, and 5% Glycerol.

Table 2

Summary of the fitting parameters of the elution peaks of the purified proteins from the PCNA-Agarose column using the EMG model.

mL

andp15werepreparedasdescribedaboveforPCNA.The

super-natantswerethendirectlyloadedontothePCNA-Agarosecolumn

pre-equilibratedwithbuffer8(Table1)ataflowrateof1ml/min

at ˜340mMNaCl(Figs.6AandB,S1DandTable2).Inthesecond

(Table1)inthepresenceofSUMOproteasetoremovetheSUMO

B,S1FandTable2)

12(Table1)toreducethesaltconcentration.Theboundprotein

Trang 6

Fig 3. Purification of human recombinant FEN1, Lig1 and p15 from E coli.(A)A simplified procedure for the purification of FEN1.(B)SDS-PAGE gel showing the different steps of purification: Lane 1, lysate; lane 2, flow-through from PCNA-Agarose column; lane 3, FEN1 elution from PCNA-Agarose column; lane 4, FEN1 after gel filtration.(C)

A simplified procedure for the purification of Lig1.(D)SDS-PAGE gel showing the different steps of purification: Lane 1, lysate; lane 2, flow-through from PCNA-Agarose column; lane 3, Lig 1 elution from PCNA-Agarose column; lane 4, flow-through from HiTrap Blue, lane 5, lig1 after HiTrap Blue elution.(E)A simplified procedure for the purification of p15.(F)SDS-PAGE gel showing the different steps of purification: Lane 1, lysate; lane 2, flow-through from PCNA-Agarose column; lane 3, p15 eluted from PCNA-Agarose column; lane 4, flow-through from HisTrap; lane 5, p15 eluted from HisTrap; lane 6, p15 after SUMO protease digestion; lane 7, untagged p15 in flow-through from HisTrap; lane 8, proteins eluted from HisTrap containing SUMO protease All proteins were separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and stained with Coomassie blue Size markers (M) (kDa) are on the left side of each gel (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

B,S1AandTable2).Thepeakfractionswerecollectedanddialyzed

Trang 7

Fig 4. Purification of human recombinant translesion DNA polymerases (Pol␬, Pol␫, Pol␩) from E coli.(A)A simplified procedure for the purification of Pol␬.(B)SDS-PAGE gel showing the different steps of purification: Lane 1, lysate; lane 2, flow-through from HisTrap; lane 3, Pol␬ eluted from HisTrap; lane 4, flow-through from PCNA-Agarose column; lane 5, Pol␬ eluted from PCNA-Agarose column; lane 6, Pol␬ after SUMO protease digestion; lane 7, untagged Pol␬ in flow-through from HisTrap; lane 8, proteins eluted from HisTrap containing SUMO protease; lane 9, Pol␬ after gel filtration.(C)A simplified procedure for the purification of Pol␫.(D)SDS-PAGE gel showing the different steps of purification: Lane 1, lysate; lane 2, flow-through from HisTrap; lane 3, Pol␫ eluted from HisTrap; lane 4, flow-through from PCNA-Agarose column; lane 5, Pol␫ eluted from PCNA-Agarose column; lane 6, Pol␫ after SUMO protease digestion; lane 7, untagged Pol␫ in flow-through from HisTrap; lane 8, proteins eluted from HisTrap containing SUMO protease.(E)A simplified procedure for the purification of Pol␩.(F)SDS-PAGE gel showing the different steps of purification: Lane 1, lysate; lane 2, flow-through from HisTrap; lane 3, Pol␩ eluted from HisTrap; lane 4, Pol␩ after SUMO protease digestion; lane 5, untagged Pol␩ in flow-through from HisTrap; lane 6, proteins eluted from HisTrap containing SUMO protease; lane 7, flow-through from PCNA-Agarose column; lane 8, Pol␩ eluted from PCNA-Agarose column All proteins were separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and stained with Coomassie blue Size markers (M) (kDa) are on the left side of each gel (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

(Table2)

clamp

Trang 8

Fig 5. Purification of PIP p21 -Tus from E coli.(A)Schematic representation of recombinant PIP p21 -Tus expression construct.(B)A simplified procedure for the purification

of PIP p21 -Tus.(C)SDS-PAGE gel showing the different steps of purification: Lane 1, lysate; lane 2, flow-through from HisTrap; lane 3, Tus eluted from HisTrap; lane 4, flow-through from PCNA-Agarose column; lane 5, Tus elution from PCNA-Agarose column; lane 6, Tus after SUMO protease digestion; lane 7, untagged Tus in flow-through from HisTrap; lane 8, proteins eluted from HisTrap containing SUMO protease All protein fractions were separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and stained with Coomassie blue Size markers (M) (kDa) are on the left side of each gel (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Fig 6. Analysis of the elution chromatograms of the purified proteins from the PCNA-Agarose column.(A)Plot of the cumulative elution percentage versus the NaCl concentration for each of the studied proteins The cumulative elution percentage is obtained as described in the Methods section The color of the curves corresponds to those indicated in the inset table The horizontal dashed line (red) indicates 50% cumulative elution The intersection of each cumulative elution percentage curve gives the median NaCl concentration of elution for each protein The median values are recorded in the inset table.(B)Corresponding concentrations of the maxima of the elution peaks for each studied protein as described in the Methods section The values are obtained by fitting the elution peaks using the described EMG model (Fig S1) The vertical bars indicate the 95% confidence interval for the positions of the maxima of the elution peaks The bars corresponding to the proteins known to contain a single PIP box are colored in red, while those corresponding to the proteins containing multiple PIP boxes are colored in blue.

byLig1(Fig.6A,BandTable2).Thisorderofaffinityisnot

frag-mentFEN1andLig1(Fig.6A,BandTable2).Pol␫hasonlyonePIP

column

Trang 9

manuscript

Funding

06.008

References

[1] J.J Lichty, J.L Malecki, H.D Agnew, D.J Michelson-Horowitz, S Tan,

Comparison of affinity tags for protein purification, Protein Expr Purif 41

(2005) 98–105.

[2] M.E Kimple, A.L Brill, R.L Pasker, Overview of affinity tags for protein

purification, Curr Protoc Protein Sci 73 (2013), Unit 9 9.

[3] T Dojima, T Nishina, T Kato, H Ueda, E.Y Park, Comparison of the efficiencies

of different affinity tags in the purification of a recombinant secretory protein

expressed in silkworm larval hemolymph, Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 14

(2009) 281–287.

[4] G.L Moldovan, B Pfander, S Jentsch, PCNA, the maestro of the replication

fork, Cell 129 (2007) 665–679.

[5] S Ohta, Y Shiomi, K Sugimoto, C Obuse, T Tsurimoto, A proteomics approach

to identify proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-binding proteins in

human cell lysates - Identification of the human CHL12/RFCs2-5 complex as a

novel PCNA-binding protein, J Biol Chem 277 (2002) 40362–40367.

[6] N Mailand, I Gibbs-Seymour, S Bekker-Jensen, Regulation of PCNA-protein

interactions for genome stability, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14 (2013) 269–282.

[7] W Strzalka, A Ziemienowicz, Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA): a key

factor in DNA replication and cell cycle regulation, Ann Bot 107 (2011)

1127–1140.

[8] J Majka, P.M.J Burgers, The PCNA-RFC families of DNA clamps and clamp

loaders, Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 78 (2004) 227–260.

[9] D Slade, Maneuvers on PCNA rings during DNA replication and repair, Genes

9 (2018).

[10] G Maga, U Hubscher, Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA): a dancer with

many partners, J Cell Sci 116 (2003) 3051–3060.

[11] E Warbrick, The puzzle of PCNA’s many partners, Bioessays 22 (2000)

997–1006.

[12] L.M Dieckman, B.D Freudenthal, M.T Washington, PCNA structure and

function: insights from structures of PCNA complexes and

post-translationally modified PCNA, Subcell Biochem 62 (2012) 281–299.

[13] A De Biasio, A.I De Opakua, G.B Mortuza, R Molina, T.N Cordeiro, F Castillo,

M Villate, N Merino, S Delgado, D Gil-Cartón, I Luque, Structure of p15

PAF–PCNA complex and implications for clamp sliding during DNA

replication and repair, Nat Commun 6 (2015) 6439.

[14] S Sakurai, K Kitano, H Yamaguchi, K Hamada, K Okada, K Fukuda, M.

Uchida, E Ohtsuka, H Morioka, T Hakoshima, Structural basis for recruitment

of human flap endonuclease 1 to PCNA, EMBO J 24 (2005) 683–693.

[15] M Hedglin, R Kumar, S.J Benkovic, Replication clamps and clamp loaders,

Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5 (2013), a010165.

[16] X.V Gomes, P.M.J Burgers, Two modes of FEN1 binding to PCNA regulated by

DNA, EMBO J 19 (2000) 3811–3821.

[17] D Dovrat, J.L Stodola, P.M.J Burgers, A Aharoni, Sequential switching of binding partners on PCNA during in vitro Okazaki fragment maturation, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111 (2014) 14118–14123.

[18] J Essers, A.F Theil, C Baldeyron, W.A van Cappellen, A.B Houtsmuller, R Kanaar, W Vermeulen, Nuclear dynamics of PCNA in DNA replication and repair, Mol Cell Biol 25 (2005) 9350–9359.

[19] Y Masuda, R Kanao, K Kaji, H Ohmori, F Hanaoka, C Masutani, Different types of interaction between PCNA and PIP boxes contribute to distinct cellular functions of Y-family DNA polymerases, Nucleic Acids Res 43 (2015) 7898–7910.

[20] L.S Waters, B.K Minesinger, M.E Wiltrout, S D’Souza, R.V Woodruff, G.C Walker, Eukaryotic translesion polymerases and their roles and regulation in DNA damage tolerance, Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 73 (2009) 134–154.

[21] A Vaisman, R Woodgate, Translesion DNA polymerases in eukaryotes: what makes them tick? Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 52 (2017) 274–303.

[22] P.W Yu, B Huang, M Shen, C Lau, E Chan, J Michel, Y Xiong, D.G Payan, Y Luo, p15(PAF), a novel PCNA associated factor with increased expression in tumor tissues, Oncogene 20 (2001) 484–489.

[23] M.J Emanuele, A Ciccia, A.E.H Elia, S.J Elledge, Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-associated KIAA0101/PAF15 protein is a cell cycle-regulated anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome substrate, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S.

A 108 (2011) 9845–9850.

[24] C.L Xie, M Yao, Q.H Dong, Proliferating cell unclear antigen-associated factor (PAF15): a novel oncogene, Int J Biochem Cell Biol 50 (2014) 127–131.

[25] M Hedglin, S.K Perumal, Z.X Hu, S Benkovic, Stepwise assembly of the human replicative polymerase holoenzyme, Elife 2 (2013).

[26] M Hedglin, M Aitha, S.J Benkovic, Monitoring the retention of human proliferating cell nuclear antigen at primer/template junctions by proteins that bind single-stranded DNA, Biochemistry 56 (2017) 3415–3421.

[27] D.G Gibson, L Young, R.Y Chuang, J.C Venter, C.A Hutchison, H.O Smith, Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases, Nat Methods 6 (2009), 343-U341.

[28] D.G Gibson, H.O Smith, C.A Hutchison, J.C Venter, C Merryman, Chemical synthesis of the mouse mitochondrial genome, Nat Methods 7 (2010), 901-U905.

[29] Y Iwata, M Takahashi, N.V Fedoroff, S.M Hamdan, Dissecting the interactions of SERRATE with RNA and DICER-LIKE 1 in Arabidopsis microRNA precursor processing, Nucleic Acids Res 41 (2013) 9129–9140.

[30] F Rashid, P.D Harris, M.S Zaher, M.A Sobhy, L.I Joudeh, C.L Yan, H Piwonski, S.E Tsutakawa, I Ivanov, J.A Tainer, S Habuchi, S.M Hamdan,

Single-molecule FRET unveils induced-fit mechanism for substrate selectivity

in flap endonuclease 1, Elife 6 (2017).

[31] F Rashid, V.S Raducanu, M.S Zaher, M Tehseen, S Habuchi, S.M Hamdan, Initial state of DNA-dye complex sets the stage for protein induced fluorescence modulation, Nat Commun 10 (2019) 2104.

[32] C Bieniossek, T.J Richmond, I Berger, MultiBac: multigene baculovirus-based eukaryotic protein complex production, Curr Protoc Protein Sci (2008), Chapter 5 Unit 5 20.

[33] Y Kalambet, Y Kozmin, K Mikhailova, I Nagaev, P Tikhonov, Reconstruction

of chromatographic peaks using the exponentially modified Gaussian function, J Chemom 25 (2011) 352–356.

[34] E Grushka, Characterization of exponentially modified Gaussian peaks in chromatography, Anal Chem 44 (1972) 1733–1738.

[35] K.J Gerik, S.L Gary, P.M.J Burgers, Overproduction and affinity purification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication factor C, J Biol Chem 272 (1997) 1256–1262.

[36] O Koniev, A Wagner, Developments and recent advancements in the field of endogenous amino acid selective bond forming reactions for bioconjugation, Chem Soc Rev 44 (2015) 5495–5551.

[37] M Hedglin, S.J Benkovic, Replication protein a prohibits diffusion of the PCNA sliding clamp along single-stranded DNA, Biochemistry 56 (2017) 1824–1835.

[38] M Hedglin, R Kumar, S.J Benkovic, Replication clamps and clamp loaders, Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5 (2013).

[39] A Hishiki, H Hashimoto, T Hanafusa, K Kamei, E Ohashi, T Shimizu, H Ohmori, M Sato, Structural basis for novel interactions between human translesion synthesis polymerases and proliferating cell nuclear antigen, J Biol Chem 284 (2009) 10552–10560.

[40] M Hedglin, B Pandey, S.J Benkovic, Stability of the human polymerase delta holoenzyme and its implications in lagging strand DNA synthesis, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113 (2016) E1777–E1786.

[41] J.B Bruning, Y Shamoo, Structural and thermodynamic analysis of human PCNA with peptides derived from DNA polymerase-delta p66 subunit and flap endonuclease-1, Structure 12 (2004) 2209–2219.

[42] M Hedglin, B Pandey, S.J Benkovic, Stability of the human polymerase delta holoenzyme and its implications in lagging strand DNA synthesis, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113 (2016) E1777–1786.

[43] J.M Gulbis, Z Kelman, J Hurwitz, M ODonnell, J Kuriyan, Structure of the C-terminal region of p21(WAF1/CIP1) complexed with human PCNA, Cell 87 (1996) 297–306.

... Emanuele, A Ciccia, A. E.H Elia, S.J Elledge, Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-associated KIAA0101/PAF15 protein is a cell cycle-regulated anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome substrate, Proc...

replication and repair, Nat Commun (2015) 6439.

[14] S Sakurai, K Kitano, H Yamaguchi, K Hamada, K Okada, K Fukuda, M.

Uchida, E Ohtsuka, H Morioka, T Hakoshima,... Strzalka, A Ziemienowicz, Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA): a key

factor in DNA replication and cell cycle regulation, Ann Bot 107 (2011)

1127–1140.

Ngày đăng: 25/12/2022, 00:44

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm