Double-stranded RNA, corresponding to the mature Pem-GIH sequence, can trigger a decrease in Pem-GIH transcript levels both in eyestalk ganglia and abdominal nerve cord explant culture a
Trang 1of Penaeus monodon and elucidation of its inhibitory role
in vitellogenin expression by RNA interference
Supattra Treerattrakool1, Sakol Panyim1,2, Siu-Ming Chan3, Boonsirm Withyachumnarnkul4,5and Apinunt Udomkit1
1 Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
2 Department of Biochemistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
3 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, China
4 Department of Anatomy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
5 Centex Shrimp, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Female reproduction in crustaceans is controlled by an
elaborate endocrine system The prominent cellular
activity that occurs during ovarian development is
known as vitellogenesis, which is the process whereby
vitellogenin (Vg), a yolk protein precursor, is
accumu-lated in the developing oocyte [1] Vitellogenesis is an
essential step in ovarian maturation Vg can be
synthe-sized in the ovary and⁄ or other nonovarian sites such
as the hepatopancreas [2–5] Vg synthesis and ovarian
maturation are regulated by an eyestalk endocrine
factor referred to as vitellogenesis-inhibiting hormone (VIH) or gonad-inhibiting hormone (GIH) [6,7] Gonad-inhibiting hormone is a member of the neu-ropeptide family that is synthesized in neuroendocrine cells located in the eyestalk medulla terminalis gangli-onic X-organ Once produced, these neuropeptides are transported to the axon terminals that form a neuro-haemal organ called the sinus gland, from where they are secreted [8] This hormone family is known as the CHH family Mature peptides of CHH family
Keywords
black tiger shrimp; ovarian maturation;
reproduction; RNA interference;
vitellogenesis
Correspondence
A Udomkit, Institute of Molecular Biology
and Genetics, Mahidol University, Salaya
Campus, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand
Fax: +66 2 441 9906
Tel: +66 2 800 3624, ext 1236
E-mail: staud@mahidol.ac.th
(Received 16 November 2007, revised 18
December 2007, accepted 25 December
2007)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06266.x
One of the important peptide hormones that control reproduction in crus-taceans is gonad-inhibiting hormone (GIH) GIH is known to modulate gonad maturation by inhibiting synthesis of vitellogenin (Vg), the precursor
of yolk proteins In this study, a cDNA encoding a GIH (Pem-GIH) from the eyestalk of Penaeus monodon was cloned using RT-PCR and RACE techniques Pem-GIH cDNA is 861 bp in size with a single ORF of 288 bp The deduced Pem-GIH consists of a 17-residue signal peptide and a mature peptide region of 79 amino acids with features typical of type II peptide hormones from the CHH family Pem-GIH transcript was detected in eye-stalk, brain, thoracic and abdominal nerve cords of adult P monodon The gonad-inhibiting activity of Pem-GIH was investigated using the RNA interference technique Double-stranded RNA, corresponding to the mature Pem-GIH sequence, can trigger a decrease in Pem-GIH transcript levels both in eyestalk ganglia and abdominal nerve cord explant culture and in female P monodon broodstock The conspicuous increase in Vg transcript level in the ovary of GIH-knockdown shrimp suggests a negative influence for Pem-GIH on Vg gene expression, and thus implies its role as
a gonad-inhibiting hormone This is the first report to demonstrate the use
of double-stranded RNA to elucidate the function of GIH in P monodon
Abbreviations
CHH, crustacean hyperglycemic hormone; GIH, gonad-inhibiting hormone; MIH, molt-inhibiting hormone; RT, reverse transcription;
Vg, vitellogenin; VIH, vitellogenesis-inhibiting hormone.
Trang 2members generally have 78–83 amino acid residues
with a molecular mass of 8–9 kDa These hormones
contain six cysteine residues that are aligned in
con-served positions [9,10] The CHH family can be
divided into two types, type I and type II, as reflected
by their primary structure [11–13] The most abundant
hormone in this family, crustacean hyperglycemic
hor-mone (CHH), belongs to type I, whereas the other two
hormones, molt-inhibiting hormone (MIH) and GIH,
are categorized in type II CHH or type I contains in
its precursor sequence a short peptide called
CHH-pre-cursor-related peptide followed by a dibasic
residue-processing site By contrast, type II hormones are
preceded directly by the signal peptides In addition,
alignment of the amino acid sequence reveals deletion
of the amino acid glycine at the fifth position after the
first cysteine residue in type I peptides
Compared with CHH and MIH, only a limited
number of GIH have been characterized to date The
first peptide with in vivo GIH activity was isolated
from the American lobster Homarus americanus [14]
Another peptide that has been shown to depress Vg
mRNA expression in the ovary fragment is the
Pej-SGP-III of Marsupenaeus japonicus [15] Likewise, a
similar approach was used to assay VIH activity in the
crayfish Procambarus bouvieri [16] MIH-B from the
shrimp Metapenaeus ensis, although capable of
extend-ing the moltextend-ing cycle, may be considered as another
candidate for GIH because the mRNA levels of this
peptide decrease sharply during the early phase of
gonad maturation and increase continuously as the
vitellogenic stages proceed [17] The cDNA encoding
GIH-like peptide is also found in a few other species
such as the Norway lobster Nephrops norvegicus [18]
and the prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii [19] How-ever, whether the peptides encoded by these cDNAs function as GIH needs further verification
In this study, a cDNA encoding GIH from Penaeus monodonand its potential role in vitellogenesis were studied Functional knockdown of Pem-GIH by double-stranded (ds)RNA was applied to demonstrate the negative effect on Vg expression in the ovary of previtellogenic adult female and thus provides evidence for its role as a GIH
Results
Cloning and characterization of Pem-GIH cDNA
A partial 3¢ cDNA sequence encoding GIH from
P monodon (Pem-GIH) was amplified by several sets
of degenerate primers (Fig 1) designed from the con-served amino acid sequences of type II hormones in the CHH family Nucleotide sequence analysis revealed that 7 of 213 recombinant clones harbored GIH-like nucleotide sequences, as judged by a unique feature of the amino acid sequences at the C-terminus, which are longer than and different from that of MIHs To obtain the 5¢ region of this cDNA, a set of specific primers was designed from the 3¢ sequence of the cDNA as described in the Experimental procedures In addition, full-length cDNA was amplified with specific primers, as shown in Fig 1 The nucleotide sequences
of the full-length Pem-GIH cDNA of eight individual recombinant clones were sequenced, and confirmed as representing identical clones Fig 2 shows the nucleo-tide sequence of Pem-GIH cDNA (GenBank accession
no DQ643389) and its deduced amino acid sequence
10 0 bp
PR T
PM 1
5′RACE-GIH1.1
ma tGIH F / T7-mat GI HF
GI HR
ma tG IH R / T7 -m at GI HR
10 0 bp
PR T
PM 1
3′RACE-GIH1A
3′RACE-GIH1 B
PRT
PM1
5′RACE-GIH1
5′RACE-GIH2
5′RACE-GIH 3
GIHF
ma tGIH F / T7-mat GI HF
GI HR
ma tG IH R / T7 -m at GI HR
Fig 1 Schematic diagram showing the structure of Pem-GIH cDNA and locations of the primers used in this study The 5¢- and 3¢-UTRs are shown as a thin line The ORF is depicted by boxes: the unfilled box represents the signal peptide and the filled box represents the mature peptide.
Trang 3The full-length cDNA encoding the putative GIH
of P monodon was composed of 861 nucleotides
containing a 5¢-UTR (93 bp), an ORF (288 bp), a stop
codon (TGA) and a 3¢-UTR (477 bp) with a potential
polyadenylation signal AATAAA located 7 bp
upstream of the poly(A) tail The ORF of Pem-GIH
codes for a protein of 96 amino acid residues The
sig-nal peptide, predicted using the sigsig-nalp 3.0 server
(http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP), consisted of
17 amino acids, whereas the remaining 79 amino acids
comprised the mature Pem-GIH peptide The deduced
amino acid sequence of putative Pem-GIH showed the
conservation of six cysteine residues in the mature
pep-tide with a glycine residue at the fifth position after
the first cysteine Mature Pem-GIH showed 68%
amino acid identity with the GIH of M ensis, but 45
and 48% amino acid identity with that of H
americ-anus(Hoa-GIH) and N norvegicus (Nen-GIH),
respec-tively (Fig 3)
Tissue-specific expression of Pem-GIH
Pem-GIHexpression in several P monodon tissues was
examined by RT-PCR using a pair of primers specific
for Pem-GIH cDNA GIH transcripts at the expected
size of 385 bp were detected in the eyestalk ganglia,
brain, thoracic nerve cord and abdominal nerve cord
of individual shrimp No GIH transcript was found in
other tissues examined This expression profile is
simi-lar to that of Mee-GIH expression in mature female
M ensis [17] Interestingly, expression of Pem-GIH in
these tissues was found in both male and female of adult and adolescent P monodon (Fig 4)
dsRNA-induced Pem-GIH knockdown in shrimp explant culture
The role of Pem-GIH was investigated by dsRNA-mediated gene silencing via RNAi, using dsRNA spe-cific to the Pem-GIH The coding sequence for mature Pem-GIH was used as template in the synthesis of specific dsRNA The efficacy of this GIH-dsRNA to knockdown GIH expression was first deter-mined in GIH-expressing tissues Briefly, eyestalk XOSG neurons and abdominal nerve cord explant were cultured in a medium that contained GIH-dsRNA RT-PCR results showed barely detectable levels of GIH transcript in the GIH-dsRNA-treated eyestalk XOSG culture from adult female shrimp after
3 h (Fig 5A) indicating that GIH expression could be efficiently inhibited by GIH-dsRNA Similar results were also seen when abdominal nerve cord from either adult or adolescent female shrimp was incubated with GIH-dsRNA for 3 and 6 h (Fig 5B,C) By contrast, the irrelevant dsRNA, GFP-dsRNA, failed to knock-down Pem-GIH mRNA expression as the abdominal nerve cord incubated with GFP-dsRNA expressed similar levels of Pem-GIH transcript to that of the control sample into which no dsRNA was added These results indicated that GIH-dsRNA was capable
of triggering sequence-specific knockdown of Pem-GIH expression in shrimp explant culture, and thus
Fig 2 Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of Pem-GIH The amino acids are presented as one-letter symbols and shown below their codons in each line The highlighted amino acid sequence represents the putative mature peptide region An asterisk marks the stop codon The putative polyadenylation site is underlined The num-bers on the left and right of the sequences show the coordinate of nucleotides and amino acids in corresponding lines.
Trang 4was a potent tool for functional study of Pem-GIH in
the shrimp
Biological assay for vitellogenesis-inhibiting
activity of Pem-GIH by dsRNA-mediated
functional knockdown
To test whether the knockdown of Pem-GIH
sion by dsRNA would interfere with Vg gene
expres-sion, previtellogenic adult female P monodon were injected with GIH-dsRNA and the level of Pem-GIH expression as well as the expression of Vg transcript in the shrimp was determined by RT-PCR
In order to determine the silencing effect of GIH-dsRNA in the shrimp, eyestalk ganglia were collected from previtellogenic adult P monodon on day 3, 5 and
7 subsequent to GIH-dsRNA injection The results (Fig 6A) show that 3 days after dsRNA injection,
Actin Pem-GIH
bp
500
400
A
Adult B
Adolescent Male
D
Actin Pem-GIH
500
400
M E S B T G N c H Hp M - v e M E S B T G N c H Hp M - v e
M E S B T G N c H Hp M - v e
M E S B T G N c H Hp M - v e
Female C
Fig 4 Expression of Pem-GIH in different tissues of P monodon RT-PCR products were amplified from the total RNA of eyestalk (ES), brain (B), thoracic nerve (TG), abdominal nerve cord (Nc), heart (H), hepatopancreas (Hp) and muscle (M) using the specific primers for the 5¢-region of Pem-GIH The negative PCR is indicated by )ve The actin transcript of P monodon was used as an internal control of the amount of RNA template Each panel shows tissue distribution of Pem-GIH in adult female (A), adult male (B), adolescent female (C) and adolescent male (D) The identity of RT-PCR products was confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Fig 3 Alignment of Pem-GIH with GIH and MIH from other species of crustacean The deduced amino acid sequence of GIH from
P monodon (Pem-GIH; this study) is aligned with GIHs of M ensis (Mee-GIH; AF294648), H americanus (Hoa-GIH; X87192), N norvegicus (Nen-GIH; AF163771) and MIHs of P monodon (Pem-MIH1; AAR89516 and Pem-MIH2; AAR89517), M japonicus (Pej-sgp-IV; BAA20432),
M ensis (Mee-MIH; AAC27452), L vannamei (Liv-MIH1; AAR04348) and F chinensis (Fec-MIH; AAL55258) Sequence identities are high-lighted in black color, and light gray depicts the conservative changes The percent identity of the pro- and mature sequences between Pem-GIH and other hormones was shown on the right to the C-terminus of the sequences.
Trang 5shrimp administered with GIH-dsRNA showed
drasti-cally reduced Pem-GIH transcript levels in the eyestalk
ganglia when compared with control shrimp injected
with Tris⁄ NaCl only This comprehensive silencing
lasted until day 5 before the expression of Pem-GIH
began to recover to some extent on day 7 Moreover,
expression of two other related genes, Pem-CHH1 and
Pem-MIH1 of P monodon, did not change in
GIH-knockdown shrimp when compared with control shrimp (Fig 6B), suggesting the specificity of Pem-GIH silencing by GIH-dsRNA Subsequently, the consequence of the depletion in GIH transcript on Vg synthesis was investigated on day 5 after GIH-dsRNA injection Fig 7 shows that the Vg transcription level was increased more than ninefold in the ovary of GIH-knockdown previtellogenic adult shrimp when
3 h
dsGIH –ve
Pem-GIH Actin
A
– +
Pem-GIH Actin
C
0 h dsGIH
3 h
Shrimp #2
dsGFP dsGIH
6 h
– + + dsGFP dsGIH
3 h
dsGFP dsGIH
6 h
dsGFP –ve
Shrimp #1
Pem-GIH
Actin
dsGIH dsGFP
3 h
dsGIH dsGFP – + + – + +
Fig 5 Expression of Pem-GIH in shrimp explant culture after incubating with GIH-dsRNA The eyestalk ganglia and abdominal nerve cord were dissected from live shrimp and incubated in modified M199 culture medium with or without the specified dsRNA The Pem-GIH and actin transcripts were detected by RT-PCR at the indicated time points (A) Expression of Pem-GIH in the eyestalk ganglia of adult female shrimp at 3 h after incubating without ( )) or with (+) GIH-dsRNA (B) Expression of Pem-GIH in the abdominal nerve cord of adult female shrimp at 3 and 6 h after incubating without ( )) or with (+) GIH-dsRNA or GFP-dsRNA as indicated (C) Expression of Pem-GIH in the abdom-inal nerve cord of two adolescent female shrimp at 3 and 6 h after incubating without ( )) or with (+) GIH-dsRNA or GFP-dsRNA as indicated )ve in (A–C) depicts the negative PCR.
B dsGIH M
Pem-GIH
Actin
700
500
bp B M dsGIH
Pem-CHH1
Actin
500
bp
B M dsGIH
Pem-MIH1 Actin
800
500
bp
Pem-GIH Actin
800 bp
500 bp
1 2 3 4 5 Buffer M 1 2 3 4 5 6 GIH-dsRNA
Day 3
Pem-GIH Actin
800 bp
500 bp
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6
Day 5
800 bp
500 bp
Day 7
Pem-GIH Actin
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3
A
B
Fig 6 Time-course and specificity of Pem-GIH silencing by dsRNA in shrimp (A) Previtellogenic adult female P monodon were injected with Tris ⁄ NaCl or 3 lg GIH-dsRNA ⁄ g body weight of shrimp Eyestalk ganglia were collected from both groups of shrimp at day 3, 5 and 7, and Pem-GIH transcripts were detected by RT-PCR Numbers represent individual shrimp in each group (B) Representative of agarose gel showing levels of Pem-GIH, Pem-CHH1 and Pem-MIH1 transcript in previtellogenic adult female shrimp detected by RT-PCR The expression
of Pem-GIH, Pem-CHH1 and Pem-MIH1 was examined in shrimp injected with Tris ⁄ NaCl (B) and GIH-dsRNA (dsGIH) on day 5 following GIH-dsRNA injection For (A) and (B), actin transcript was amplified as internal control and M represent 100 bp ladder DNA marker.
Trang 6compared with that in control shrimp The increase in
the ratio of Vg to actin transcripts in the GIH-depleted
background suggested that functional knockdown of
Pem-GIH led to the induced expression of Vg in the
ovary
Discussion
Because of the lack of information on the GIH in
pen-aeid shrimp, the attempt to clone GIH cDNA from
P monodon in this study was carried out using a
RACE approach with degenerate primers designed
from the conserved amino acid sequences among
MIH⁄ GIH from other species of crustaceans To
increase the possibility of obtaining the GIH cDNA of
P monodon, codons preferably used for CHH
(GenBank accession nos AF233295, AY346379 and
AY346380) and MIH (GenBank accession nos
AY496454 and AY496455) genes of this species were
also taken into consideration for primer design In
addition, mRNA from eyestalk neurons of adult female
P monodon at different vitellogenic stages as
deter-mined by gonadal somatic index were used as the
tem-plate for cDNA cloning in this study This is based on
a previous study which showed high levels of GIH
mRNA in the sinus gland during previtellogenesis
and vitellogenesis [20] A putative GIH cDNA of
P monodon (Pem-GIH) was successfully cloned using
the aforementioned strategy The deduced amino acid sequence of putative GIH from P monodon possesses all the characteristics in agreement with a type II hormone from the CHH family [11–13] Moreover, the C-terminus of Pem-GIH had an extension of two amino acid residues when compared with that of MIH This is consistent with previously identified GIHs from other crustacean species (Fig 3) Pem-GIH cDNA was thus subsequently examined for its gonad-inhibiting function by using a RNA interference (RNAi) technique
RNAi, a post-transcription gene-silencing process in which dsRNA triggers sequence-specific suppression of its cognate mRNA [21], is a powerful tool for studying gene function [22–24] In P monodon, a dsRNA-induced gene-silencing phenomenon has been recently demonstrated [25], therefore it was selected as a tool for studying the functional knockdown of Pem-GIH cDNA
in this study GIH-specific dsRNA was synthesized from
a 240 bp coding region of the mature Pem-GIH The use of long dsRNA provides the possibility of generating more varieties of effective siRNA (21–23 nucleotides) molecules Nevertheless, the nonspecific silencing, known as off-target phenomenon, may also occur from these diverse siRNA products of the long dsRNA [26,27] To minimize this off-target silencing, the GIH-dsRNA sequence was used to search for a pos-sible region of 21–23 consecutively identical nucleotides
in the sequences of all P monodon CHH and MIH A nucleotide sequence comparison revealed no such region (data not shown) in either CHHs or MIHs, suggesting that the GIH-dsRNA should direct sequence-specific silencing of Pem-GIH with a minimal off-target effect
on other related genes Indeed, this was clearly showed
by the result in Fig 6B in which the shrimp adminis-tered with GIH-dsRNA still expressed CHH and MIH
at the level comparable with that of the control shrimp The efficacy of GIH-dsRNA to silence Pem-GIH expression was manifested by the dramatic depletion in Pem-GIH mRNA level in shrimp eyestalk ganglia and abdominal nerve cords as early as 3 h after incubating with GIH-dsRNA This silencing was not affected by irrelevant dsRNA, thus indicating that Pem-GIH knockdown occurred in a sequence-specific fashion Similar specific silencing of Pem-GIH by GIH-dsRNA was also demonstrated in adolescent female P monodon (Fig S1) Accordingly, any biological changes observed following GIH-dsRNA injection may be considered the consequence of Pem-GIH knockdown
To date, no conclusive evidence about the mode of action of GIH on vitellogenesis has been established Recently, the recombinant vitellogeneis-inhibiting hormone (VIH or GIH) of H americanus has been
GIH/actin
Buffer
GIH dsRNA
GIH/actin
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Vg/actin
Vg/actin
Fig 7 Influence of GIH-dsRNA on Pem-GIH and Vg expression in
previtellogenic adult female shrimp Shrimp were injected with
Tris ⁄ NaCl or GIH-dsRNA Eyestalk ganglia and ovaries were
col-lected at 5 days after injection to examine for Pem-GIH and Vg
mRNA levels, respectively, by RT-PCR The graph represents
rela-tive expression levels of Pem-GIH compared with actin levels that
were quantified using the SCION IMAGE program Values are shown
as mean ± SEM (n = 5) Relative amounts of Pem-GIH⁄ actin
tran-script in both the control (Tris ⁄ NaCl-injected) and
GIH-dsRNA-injected shrimp are represented by gray bars (P < 0.01), whereas
those of Vg ⁄ actin transcript in both groups of shrimp are shown by
white bars (P < 0.05).
Trang 7reported for its biological activity to inhibit Vg mRNA
synthesis in the ovary of heterologous species, M
japo-nicus[28] In addition to the ovary, hepatopancreas has
been revealed as another site for Vg synthesis in shrimp
[29,30] Although the function of Vg originating from
the hepatopancreas has not been clearly evidenced, it
has been shown that Vg expression in the
hepatopan-creas is correlated with ovarian maturation [31] After
synthesis in the hepatopancreas, Vg undergoes
post-translational processing into smaller subunits by a
sub-tilisin-like endoprotease, these subunits are then
released into the hemolymph These hemolymph Vg
subunits are further processed by an unidentified
enzyme before being sequestered by the ovary, and
form yolk protein (vitellin) subunits [32] The induced
ovarian Vg expression of GIH-knockdown
previtello-genic adult P monodon evidently indicates the
inhibi-tory function of Pem-GIH on Vg gene expression in the
ovary Our results are in concurrence with an increase
in Vg expression after eyestalk ablation in M japonicus
[33,34] and L vannamei [35] In addition, the level of
Vg expression in hepatopancreas was not appreciably
affected following dsRNA-mediated knockdown of
Pem-GIH (data not shown) This is not unanticipated
because Vg synthesis was not induced in
hepatopan-creas of eyestalk-ablated shrimp either, especially
within the first 7 days following eyestalk ablation [33]
In addition, Okumura et al showed that the Vg mRNA
level increased slowly in hepatopancreas at the start of
vitellogenesis in naturally mature female of M
japoni-cus, compared with that in the ovary [36] Empirically,
our results support the postulation that ovarian Vg is
required for early maturation of the ovary in
crusta-ceans [5] and conform well to the precocious ovarian
development after the main source of GIH synthesis
was removed by eyestalk extirpation [37]
Although a similar strategy was used to analyze the
function of CHH cDNA from L schmitti [38], the
effect of CHH silencing on glucose level was
deter-mined at 24 h after dsRNA injection Our study
clearly demonstrates that the effect of dsRNA silencing
is effective for at least 5 days in shrimp, which
pro-vides further benefit to the use of dsRNA for analysis
of genes whose function has long-term physiological
influence
Although the function of GIH has been studied
mainly in female crustaceans, expression of Pem-GIH
in male P monodon, which is similar to previous
reports [17,39], implies that GIH may play a more
ver-satile role in the male as well Eyestalk ablation in the
crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus resulted in an
overex-pression of androgenic gland polypeptides, which had
a direct effect on male reproductive system [40]
Whether Pem-GIH is involved in reproduction in male
P monodonneeds further investigation
In summary, this study identified and characterized Pem-GIHcDNA of P monodon in both molecular and biological aspects The system of a functional–knock-down study was exploited using GIH-specific dsRNA, and revealed, for the first time, the influence of Pem-GIH on vitellogenin transcript levels in the ovary, which directly linked GIH to expression of Vg mRNA Finally, our results demonstrated that dsRNA-medi-ated gene silencing has a potential as a powerful tool for functional study of other genes in crustaceans
Experimental procedures
Animals
Wild adult female P monodon, at different vitellogenic stages, were caught from the Gulf of Thailand, Chonburi Province, Thailand They were used in cDNA cloning experiments Previtellogenic adult female P monodon used for the GIH functional assay were domesticated shrimp
Thailand)
Experiments involving animals were carried out in accor-dance with animal care and use protocol of the Mahidol University Animal Care and Use Committee (MUACUC)
Total RNA preparation and first-strand cDNA synthesis
Eyestalk neurons were dissected from individual eyestalks
of adult female shrimp at various stages of reproductive
Research Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA) Total RNA of eyestalks was extracted by using TRI-REAGENT accord-ing to instructions of the manufacturer’s protocol
The reverse transcription (RT) step was performed with ImProm-II reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol using
500 nm of oligo(dT)16 or PRT primer (5¢-CCGGAATTC AAGCTTCTAGAGGATCCTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT-3¢) to prime cDNA synthesis at 42C for 60 min
RACE
The degenerate primers used in 3¢-RACE of Pem-GIH cDNA were designed from the conserved amino acid sequences of MIH⁄ GIH from several species of crustacean
In the first round of PCR, a 1 lL aliquot of cDNA was amplified with 3¢-RACE-GIH1A [5¢-TG(TC)(AC)CIGGIG TIATGGG(TC)AAC(AC)GIGA-3¢] and PM1 (5¢-CCGG AATTCAAGCTTCTAGAGGATCC-3¢) primers in 25 lL
Trang 8of a reaction mixture containing 10 mm Tris⁄ HCl pH 9.0,
50 mm KCl, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1.5 mm MgCl2, 200 nm of
each primer, 200 lm each of dATP, dCTP, dGTP, dTTP
and 1.25 units of Taq DNA Polymerase in storage buffer B
(Promega) Amplification was performed in a DNA thermal
cycler (GeneAmp System 2400; PE Applied Biosystems,
Foster City, CA, USA) with 35 cycles of 94C for 30 s,
50C for 30 s and 74 C for 1 min followed by 7 min
incu-bation at 74C as a final extension Subsequently, nested
amplification was performed with 200 nm of
(TC)(GA)AIAA(AG)GT-3¢] and PM1 primers to obtain the
specific product
For 5¢-RACE, first-strand cDNA synthesis was
per-formed in a reaction as described above, except that 1 lm
of 5¢-RACE-GIH1 primer (5¢-CCACGGCCGGCCGGC
ATTGAG-3¢) was substituted for PRT primer The reaction
was carried out using two-step RT The first RT step was
denatured again at 83C for 3 min and then immediately
on ice for 5 min For the second RT step, 1 lL of
ImProm-II reverse transcriptase was added to the reaction The
reaction was incubated at 50C for 60 min and then
degraded with RNaseH before proceeding with cDNA
purification by QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen,
Hilden, Germany) A 20 lL aliquot of purified cDNA was
tailed with dATP in 30 lL of 100 mm cacodylate buffer
(pH 6.8), 1 mm CoCl2, 0.1 mm dithiothreitol, 200 lm dATP
and 20 units of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)
(Promega) The reaction was incubated at 37C for 20 min
and TdT was heat-inactivated at 65C for 10 min The first
round PCR with 3 lL of the dA-tailed cDNA template was
carried out as described for 3¢-RACE using 200 nm of
5¢-RACE-GIH2 (5¢-GGCCTCGCGCTTGGCCGAGTG-3¢)
and PRT primers, except that annealing was performed at
200 nm of 5¢-RACE-GIH3 (5¢-TCGATTTCTGCACAAGC
CATCCAGCTG-3¢) and PM1 primers to obtain specific
amplified product
Amplification of full-length Pem-GIH cDNA
Total RNA extracted from one pair of eyestalks from an
adult female shrimp in stage IV of vitellogenesis, as
described above, was used to synthesize a cDNA template
for the cloning of full-length cDNA of Pem-GIH A 1 lL
aliquot of cDNA was amplified with GIHF (5¢-GAACGTC
TCGTATAAAAGGTCTGCG-3¢) and GIHR (5¢-GGTCG
ACTTTATTTTAACGGAAAATTAAT-3¢) primers in a
25 lL reaction containing 1· Phusion HF buffer including
1.5 mm MgCl2, 500 nm of each primer, 200 lm each of
dATP, dCTP, dGTP, dTTP and 0.25 units of Phusion
DNA Polymerase (Finnzymes, Espoo, Finland)
Amplifica-tion was performed in a DNA thermal cycler (GeneAmp
System 2400; PE Applied Biosystems) with 35 cycles of
98C for 10 s, 50 C for 30 s and 72 C for 1 min followed
by 7 min incubation at 72C as a final extension
RT-PCR
To detect tissue-specific expression of Pem-GIH, total RNA extracted from several P monodon tissues, including eye-stalks, brain, thoracic nerve cord, abdominal nerve cord, heart, hepatopancreas, ovary and muscle, was used as a template for RT with PRT primer as described above The specific transcript of Pem-GIH was amplified with GIHF and 5¢-RACE-GIH1 primers to detect Pem-GIH transcript level in all experiments The reaction was amplified with
35 cycles of 94C for 30 s, 50 C for 30 s and 74 C for
1 min followed by 7 min incubation at 74C as a final extension To detect Vg transcript in the ovary, Vg-F
(5¢-AAGCTTGGCAATGTATTCCTTTT-3¢) primers desig-ned from the EST clone containing Vg sequence from
P monodonovary (GenBank accession no EE332453) were used in a reaction with 32 cycles of 94C for 30 s, 50 C for 30 s and 74C for 1 min followed by 7 min incubation
at 74C The actin transcript was amplified with PmActin-F (5¢-GACTCGTACGTCGGGCGACGAGG-3¢) and
primers in a reaction with 21 cycles of 94C for 30 s,
55C for 30 s and 74 C for 1 min followed by further incubation at 74C for 7 min The expected sizes of Pem-GIH, Vg and actin transcripts are 385, 354 and
539 bp, respectively
Preparation of GIH-dsRNA Production of GIH-dsRNA by in vitro transcription
Two DNA templates for dsRNA of GIH that span the coding sequence of the mature Pem-GIH, each containing T7 promoter sequence at the 5¢-end on different strands were synthesized by PCR from full-length Pem-GIH cDNA Two separate PCR reactions were set up, one with T7-containing forward primer (5¢-TAATACGACTCACTA TAGGGAGAAACATCCTGGACAGCAAATGCAGGG-3¢) and reverse primer (5¢-CCGGCATTGAGGATGCTGAT-3¢) for the sense-strand template, the other with forward primer matGIHF (5¢-AACATCCTGGACAGCAAATGCA GGG-3¢) and T7-containing reverse primer (5¢-TAATACG ACTCACTATAGGGAGACCGGCATTGAGGATGCTG AT-3¢) for the antisense-strand template The reaction consisted of denaturation at 94C for 30 s, annealing at
9 cycles with a 1C decrease in annealing temperature per cycle; the annealing temperature then remained at
extension at 74C for 7 min The expected PCR product were excised and purified with a gel extraction kit
Trang 9(Qiagen), as described in the manufacturer’s protocol A
mixture of 1 lg of each template was used in an in vitro
(Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) according to the
manufac-turer’s protocol with some modifications Briefly, sense- and
antisense-strand templates were amplified in separate PCR
as described above The two templates were mixed in equal
amounts and added to a single transcription reaction to
syn-thesize dsRNA with T7 RNA polymerase at 37C for 6 h
To increase the duplex yield, the transcription reaction was
incubated at 75C for 5 min, and allowed to cool to room
temperature The remaining DNA template and
single-stranded RNA in solution were digested with DNaseI and
RNaseA at 37C for 1 h The proteins, free nucleotides and
degraded nucleic acid residues were removed from
double-stranded RNA by the filter cartridge as described in
manu-facturer’s instructions Finally, dsRNA was eluted with
100 lL of 95C pre-heated 10 mm Tris ⁄ HCl pH 7, and
1 mm EDTA
Production of GIH-dsRNA by in vivo expression in
Escherichia coli
In order to obtain large quantity of dsRNA for the in vivo
functional assay, GIH-dsRNA was produced as
hairpin-RNA precursor in E coli following a previously described
method [25] with some modifications A 340 bp DNA
template for the sense strand of dsRNA connecting with a
loop region was amplified with primers sense-GIHF1-XbaI
(5¢-GCTCTAGAAACATCCTGGACAGCA-3¢) and
GA-3¢) Another DNA template for the antisense strand of
dsRNA, 240 bp, was amplified with primers as-GIHF-SalI
CCGGC-3¢) The antisense template was first cloned into
pET17b vector at BamHI and XhoI sites, following by the
sense template at XbaI and BamHI The resulting
recombi-nant plasmid was constructed and propagated in E coli
DH5a and its nucleotide sequence was verified by
auto-mated DNA sequencing
The recombinant plasmid of hairpin-RNA of Pem-GIH
was subsequently transformed into an RNaseIII-deficient
induced with 0.4 mm isopropyl thio-b-d-galactoside for
2 h in 2· YT medium Cells were harvested by
centrifu-gation and resuspended in 500 lL NaCl⁄ Pi containing
0.1% SDS The sample was boiled for 2 min and then
snapped cool on ice To eliminate endogenous RNA from
bacterial cell and single-stranded RNA in the loop region
of GIH hairpin-RNA, the cell lysate was treated with
extracted by using TRI-REAGENT (Molecular Research
Center) and resuspended in Tris⁄ NaCl (10 mm Tris ⁄ HCl
pH 7, 10 mm NaCl)
The quantity of dsRNA was determined by the UV spec-trophotometry at an absorbancy of A260
dsRNA-mediated Pem-GIH knockdown in shrimp explant culture
Eyestalk ganglia or abdominal nerve cords of P monodon were dissected from individual shrimp The eyestalk from
a single shrimp was used in each experiment The XOSG neuron from the left eyestalk was used as a negative control whereas that from the right eyestalk was treated with dsRNA as described below Nerve cord from the same shrimp was cut into 0.8–1 cm pieces and used in one set
of the experiment The explant samples were incubated in a well of 24-well plate filled with 1.5 mL of modified M199 culture medium consisting of M199 powder in crab saline (440 mm NaCl, 11 mm KCl, 13.3 mm CaCl2, 26 mm MgCl2, 26 mm Na2SO4 and 10 mm Hepes pH 7.2) supple-mented with 100 lgÆmL)1 penicillin–streptomycin anti-fungus and 40 lgÆmL)1 gentamicin sulfate The samples were added to 3 lg of GIH-dsRNA and cultured with shaking at 20–24C for the appropriate length of time Samples were then washed with modified M199 medium plus antibiotic before collected for RNA extraction The level of Pem-GIH transcript was detected by RT-PCR with GIHF and 5¢-RACE-GIH1 primers as described earlier
Functional knockdown assay for Pem-GIH activity
Previtellogenic adult female P monodon at the intermolt and early premolt stages (C–D2) ( 85–120 g each) were cultured in tanks filled with artificial seawater ( 30 p.p.t salinity) Shrimp were divided into two groups, each con-taining five shrimp The control group was injected through the arthrodial membrane of the second walking leg with Tris⁄ NaCl ( 3 lLÆg)1 body weight) and the experimental group was injected with GIH-dsRNA ( 3 lgÆlL)1) at
3 lgÆg)1body weight The level of GIH and Vg transcripts
in eyestalk ganglia and ovary, respectively were detected by RT-PCR 5 days after being administered with dsRNA
Statistical analysis
Results are presented as mean ± SEM Statistical signifi-cance between values was determined by Levene’s test of independent sample t-test from spss for Windows 11.5
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge Hiu Kwan Tiu (School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong) for her kind advice on the shrimp explant culture technique We thank Ms Junpim Wannarungsi at Bangkok Aquacul-ture Farm Company (BAFCO) for supplying adult
Trang 10female P monodon This study was supported by The
Royal Golden Jubilee PhD program to ST, the RD&E
Funding from BIOTEC, Thailand and Mahidol
Uni-versity research grant SMC was supported by a grant
(HKU#7482⁄ 05M) from the Research Grant Council
of the Hong Kong SAR Government
References
1 Tsukimura B (2001) Crustacean vitellogenesis: its role
in oocyte development Am Zool 41, 465–476
2 Tsutsui N, Kawazoe I, Ohira T, Jasmani S, Yang W-J,
Wilder MN & Aida K (2000) Molecular
characteriza-tion of a cDNA encoding vitellogenin and its expression
in the hepatopancreas and ovary during vitellogenesis in
the Kuruma prawn, Penaeus japonicus Zool Sci 17,
651–660
3 Avarre J-C, Michelis R, Tietz A & Lubzens E (2003)
Relationship between vitellogenin and vitellin in a
mar-ine shrimp (Penaeus semisulcatus) and molecular
charac-terization of vitellogenin complementary DNAs Biol
Reprod 69, 355–364
4 Tsang W-S, Quackenbush LS, Chow BKC, Tiu SHK,
He JG & Chan S-M (2003) Organization of the shrimp
vitellogenin gene: evidence of multiple genes and tissue
specific expression by the ovary and hepatopancreas
Gene 303, 99–109
5 Yang F, Xu HT, Dai ZM & Yang WJ (2005) Molecular
characterization and expression analysis of vitellogenin
in the marine crab Portunus trituberculatus Comp
Biochem Physiol B 142, 456–464
6 Charmantier G, Charmantier-Daures M & Van Herp F
(1997) Hormonal regulation of growth and
reproduc-tion in crustaceans In Endocrinology and Reproducreproduc-tion,
Recent Advances in Marine Biotechnology, Vol 1
(Fingerman M, Nagabhushanam R & Thompson M-F,
eds), pp 109–161 Science Publishers, Enfield, NH
7 Huberman A (2000) Shrimp endocrinology A review
Aquaculture 191, 191–208
8 Skinner DM (1985) Molting and regeneration In The
Biology of Crustacea, Integuments, Pigments and
Hormonal Processes, Vol 9 (Bliss DE & Mantel LH
eds), pp 43–146 Academic Press, Orlando, FL
9 Keller R (1992) Crustacean neuropeptides: structures,
functions and comparative aspects Experientia 48, 439–
448
10 Ohira T, Katayama H, Tominaga S, Takasuka T,
Nakatsuji T, Sonobe T, Aida K & Nagasawa H (2005)
Cloning and characterization of a molt-inhibiting
hormone-like peptide from the prawn Marsupenaeus
japonicus Peptide 26, 259–268
11 Lacombe C, Greve P & Martin G (1999) Overview
on the sub-grouping of the crustacean hyperglycemic
hormone family Neuropeptides 33, 71–80
12 Chen SH, Lin CY & Kuo CM (2005) In silico analysis
of crustacean hyperglycemic hormone family Mar Biotechnol 7, 193–206
13 Chan SM, Gu PL, Chu KH & Tobe SS (2003) Crusta-cean neuropeptide genes of the CHH⁄ MIH ⁄ GIH family: implications from molecular studies Gen Comp Endocrinol 134, 214–219
14 Soyez D, Van Deijnen JE & Martin M (1987) Isolation and characterization of a vitellogenesis-inhibiting factor from the sinus gland of the lobster, Homarus americ-anus J Exp Zool 244, 479–484
15 Tsutsui N, Katayama H, Ohira T, Nagasawa H, Wilder
MN & Aida K (2005) The effects of crustacean hyper-glycemic hormone-family peptides on vitellogenin gene expression in the kuruma prawn, Marsupenaeus japonicus Gen Comp Endocrinol 144, 232–239
16 Aguilar MB, Quackenbush LS, Hunt DT, Shabanowitz
J & Huberman A (2002) Identification, purification and initial characterization of the vitellogenesis-inhibiting hormone from the Mexican crayfish Procambarus bouvieri(Ortmann) Comp Biochem Physiol B 102, 491–498
17 Gu P-L, Tobe SS, Chow BKC, Chu KH, He J-G & Chan S-M (2002) Characterization of an additional molt inhibiting hormone-like neuropeptide from the shrimp Metapenaeus ensis Peptide 23, 1875–1883
18 Edomi P, Azzoni E, Mettulio R, Pandolfelli N, Ferrero
EA & Giulianini PG (2002) Gonad-inhibiting hormone
of the Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus): cDNA cloning, expression, recombinant protein production, and immunolocalization Gene 284, 93–102
19 Yang W-J & Rao KR (2001) Cloning of precursors for two MIH⁄ VIH-related peptides in the prawn, Macrob-rachium rosenbergii Biochem Biophys Res Commun 289, 407–413
20 De Kleijn DPV, Janssen KPC, Waddy SL & Hegeman R (1998) Expression of the crustacean hyperglycemic hor-mones and the gonad-inhibiting hormone during the reproductive cycle of the female American lobster Homarus americanus J Endrocrinol 156, 291–298
21 Hannon GL (2002) RNA interference Nature 418, 244–251
22 Tsuzuki S, Sekiguchi S & Hayakawa Y (2005) Regula-tion of growth-blocking peptide expression during embryogenesis of the cabbage armyworm Biochem Biophys Res Commun 335, 1078–1084
23 Volz J, Osta MA, Kafatos FC & Muller HM (2005) The roles of two clip domain serine proteases in innate immune responses of the malaria vextor Anopheles gambiae J Biol Chem 280, 40161–40168
24 Martin D, Maestro O, Cruz J, Mane-Padros D & Belles X (2006) RNAi studies reveal a conserved role for RXR in molting in the cockroach Blattella germa-nica J Insect Physiol 52, 410–416