Báo cáo khoa học: Crystal structure of the halotolerant c-glutamyltranspeptidase from Bacillus subtilis in complex with glutamate reveals a unique architecture of the solvent-exposed catalytic pocket docx

c-glutamyltranspeptidase from Bacillus subtilis in complex with glutamate reveals a unique architecture of the solvent-exposed catalytic pocket Kei Wada1, Machiko Irie1, Hideyuki Suzuki2

c-glutamyltranspeptidase from Bacillus subtilis in complex with glutamate reveals a unique architecture of the

solvent-exposed catalytic pocket

Kei Wada1, Machiko Irie1, Hideyuki Suzuki2and Keiichi Fukuyama1

1 Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Japan

2 Division of Applied Biology, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Japan

Introduction

c-Glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT; EC 2.3.2.2), an

enzyme found in bacteria, yeast, plants, and mammals,

is involved in the degradation of c-glutamyl

com-pounds such as glutathione (GSH;

c-glutamyl-cyste-inyl-glycine) [1], a process that is critical to maint enance of the cellular redox state [1–3] GGT catalyzes the initial step of the degradation of extracellular GSH into its constituent amino acids, which are then

Keywords

electrostatic surface potential; glutathione;

Ntn-hydrolase family; salt-tolerant;

c-glutamyltranspeptidase

Correspondence

K Fukuyama, Department of Biological

Sciences, Graduate School of Science,

Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka

560-0043, Japan

Fax: +81 6 6850 5425

Tel: +81 6 6850 5422

E-mail: fukuyama@bio.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp

(Received 3 October 2009, revised 5

November 2009, accepted 8 December

2009)

doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07543.x

c-Glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT; EC 2.3.2.2), an enzyme found in organ-isms from bacteria to mammals and plants, plays a central role in glutathi-one metabolism Structural studies of GGTs from Escherichia coli and Helicobacter pylori have revealed detailed molecular mechanisms of catalysis and maturation In these two GGTs, highly conserved residues form the catalytic pockets, conferring the ability of the loop segment to shield the bound c-glutamyl moiety from the solvent Here, we have exam-ined the Bacillus subtilis GGT, which apparently lacks the amino acids corresponding to the lid-loop that are present in mammalian and plant GGTs as well as in most bacterial GGTs Another remarkable feature of

B subtilis GGT is its salt tolerance; it retains 86% of its activity even in

3 m NaCl To better understand these characteristics of B subtilis GGT,

we determined its crystal structure in complex with glutamate, a product of the enzymatic reaction, at 1.95 A˚ resolution This structure revealed that, unlike the E coli and H pylori GGTs, the catalytic pocket of B subtilis GGT has no segment that covers the bound glutamate; consequently, the glutamate is exposed to solvent Furthermore, calculation of the electro-static potential showed that strong acidic patches were distributed on the surface of the B subtilis GGT, even under high-salt conditions, and this may allow the protein to remain in the hydrated state and avoid self-aggre-gation The structural findings presented here have implications for the molecular mechanism of GGT

Structured digital abstract

l MINT-7383558 : GGT (uniprotkb: P54422 ) and GGT (uniprotkb: P54422 ) bind ( MI:0407 ) by X-ray crystallography ( MI:0114 )

Abbreviations

GGT, c-glutamyltranspeptidase; GSH, glutathione; L-subunit, large subunit; S-subunit, small subunit.

transported into the cell and reused as a cysteine source

[1,3–5] The localization of GGT differs by organism:

in bacteria, GGT is expressed in the periplasmic space

or secreted into the extracellular environment [1]; in

mammalian cells, it is bound to the external surface of

the plasma membrane [1,5]; and in plants, it is localized

to the apoplast and the vacuole [6]

The mature GGT is a heterodimer comprising one

large subunit (L-subunit;  40 kDa) and one small

subunit (S-subunit;  20 kDa), generated by

post-translational autocatalytic cleavage of the inactive

pre-cursor protein ( 60 kDa) [7] Crystallographic studies

of GGTs from Escherichia coli and Helicobacter pylori

have revealed the detailed molecular mechanisms of

catalysis and maturation [8–10] The side chain of

Thr391 of the E coli GGT precursor protein acts as

the nucleophile for the cleavage, by which it becomes

the new N-terminal residue of the S-subunit, and in

turn acts as the nucleophile for the enzymatic reaction

Following cleavage, the C-terminal segment of the

L-subunit (I378–Q390) moves away from the

threo-nine, thereby forming the c-glutamyl moiety-binding

pocket and concomitantly allowing the flexible loop

(residues 438–449 of the E coli GGT) to cover the

pocket Interestingly, the loop has been shown to

shield the catalytic pocket from the solvent when the

pocket is occupied by a substrate or inhibitor, whereas

the loop is disordered when the pocket is empty [10–

12] Hence, we assumed that the loop, which is called

the ‘lid-loop’, is involved in recruiting the substrate by

changing its conformation according to the conditions

of the catalytic pocket, and is therefore necessary for

the GGT reaction Indeed, mutational analysis of

H pylori GGT demonstrated that substitution of a

res-idue on the loop (Y433A) significantly diminished its

catalytic activity [13]

We were interested in Bacillus subtilis GGT because

it lacks the sequences corresponding to the lid-loop,

and instead has extra residues at the C-terminus of the

L-subunit, whereas the catalytic threonine and the

resi-dues involved in substrate binding are mostly

con-served (Fig 1) A phylogenetic sequence alignment of

confirmed and putative GGTs using the Microbial

Genome Database [14] showed that, among the

enzymes from 305 species, several bacterial GGTs,

including those of Bacillus, Oceanobacillus and

Staphy-lococcus, apparently lack the sequences corresponding

to the lid-loop Because the structural rearrangements

occur at the active site pocket upon E coli GGT

mat-uration [10], the inserted residues at the L-subunit

C-terminus in B subtilis GGT could shield the active

site pocket by occupying the position corresponding to

the lid-loop To better understand the significance of

the absence of the lid-loop sequence and the presence

of the extra residues at the L-subunit C-terminus, we embarked on a crystallographic analysis of B subtilis GGT in complex with glutamate

Another goal of this analysis was to determine the structural factors underlying the salt tolerance of

B subtilis GGT [15,16] In the presence of 3 m NaCl,

B subtilis GGT retained 86% of its hydrolytic activity, whereas E coli GGT lost 90% of its activity, in com-parison with NaCl-free conditions B subtilis GGT has therefore attracted attention because of its possible application to the fermentation of food in high salt concentrations, e.g with soy sauce and miso (fer-mented soybeans), the traditional Japanese seasonings,

in which the desired taste depends mainly on the amount of glutamic acid present Elucidation of the structural factors related to the salt tolerance of

B subtilis GGT may help in the development of bet-ter-engineered GGT

Here, we report the crystal structure of B subtilis GGT in complex with glutamate, a product of the enzymatic reaction, at 1.95 A˚ resolution, revealing the unique structure of the catalytic pocket We also pres-ent a structural comparison between the salt-tolerant

B subtilis GGT and the nonhalophilic E coli GGT

Results and Discussion

Overall structure of B subtilis GGT N-terminal His-tagged GGT from B subtilis lacking the signal peptide composed of the first 35 residues was produced in E coli The recombinant protein was subjected to autocatalytic processing to yield a stable heterodimeric enzyme comprising an L-subunit (resi-dues 36–402) and an S-subunit (resi(resi-dues 403–587) The structure of this GGT in complex with glutamate, a product of the enzymatic reaction, was refined at 1.95 A˚ resolution to R and Rfree values of 0.208 and 0.262, respectively The asymmetric unit contains two GGT molecules, which bind one glutamate each at identical sites Although the electron density for GGT was mostly of high quality and continuous, the densi-ties for the N-terminal His-tag segment and resi-dues 396–402, corresponding to the C-terminus of the L-subunit, were poorly defined; therefore, these resi-dues were not included in the model B subtilis GGT has a four-layer sandwich (a⁄ b ⁄ b ⁄ a) core structure, comprising two central b-sheets and surrounding a-helices, similar to the structure of the Ntn hydrolase superfamily [17,18]

Recently, the crystal structure of ligand free-GGT from B subtilis was determined by Sharath et al

(Protein Data Bank ID: 2V36) To determine the

struc-tural change caused by the binding of glutamate, the

structures of ligand-free GGT and glutamate-bound

GGT were superimposed No significant structural change was observed; the rmsd for the Ca atom was 0.40 A˚ In the glutamate-bound GGT, one additional

Fig 1 Multiple sequence alignment of GGTs from several representative organisms The sequence numbering is shown for B subtilis GGT Identical residues are highlighted in light green, and similar residues are boxed in blue The residues of the catalytic nucleophile are high-lighted in orange The residues that participate in hydrogen bonding with glutamate are highhigh-lighted in yellow The secondary structural ele-ments of B subtilis GGT are shown above the alignment, and 3 10 helices are labeled g The figure was prepared with CLUSTALW [35] and ESPRIPT [36] B subtilis 168, NCBI accession no NP_389723; E coli K-12, NP_417904; H pylori, NP_207909; Human, Homo sapiens, NM_005265; Pig, Sus scrofa, NM_214030; Rat, Rattus norvegicus, NM_053840.

residue in the C-terminal region of the L-subunit was

visible as compared with ligand-free GGT

One glutamate was bound to each of the deeply

grooved catalytic pockets in the asymmetric unit, and

the glutamate-binding modes are identical to each

other (Fig 2A) The a-carboxyl and a-amino groups

of the bound glutamate are at the bottom of the

pocket, and are held in this position by extensive

hydrogen bonds and salt bridges in a similar manner

as the c-glutamyl intermediate in the E coli GGT

molecule [8] and the glutamate complex in the

H pylori GGT molecule [13] The carboxyl group is bonded with Arg113 Ng, Ser464 Oc, and Ser465 N, and the a-amino group with Glu442 Oe, Glu423 Oe, and Asp445 Od The glutamate carbonyl oxygen at the e-position is hydrogen-bonded with the two main chain amino groups of Gly485 and Gly486, which are assumed to form the oxyanion hole As compared with

E coli GGT (Fig 2B) [8], all of the interactions with glutamate are identical, except that Glu423 and Glu442 in B subtilis GGT are replaced by asparagine (Asn411) and glutamine (Gln430), respectively, in

E coliGGT

Unique structure of the catalytic pocket of

B subtilis GGT Comparison of the B subtilis GGT structure with the previously reported E coli and H pylori GGT struc-tures [8,9] revealed a unique structural feature of B sub-tilis GGT (Fig 3) Unlike in the E coli and H pylori GGTs, in which the lid-loop covers the catalytic pocket when the pocket is occupied by the substrate or one of its analogs, in the B subtilis GGT there was no ordered segment covering the bound glutamate in the catalytic pocket (Fig 3A) Consequently, the bound glutamate is exposed to solvent, whereas the glutamates in both

E coli and H pylori GGTs are buried as if in a cave (Fig 3B,C) The segment of B subtilis GGT that corre-sponds to the lid-loops of the E coli and H pylori GGTs (439–448 and 428–437 residues) is cut short

B subtilis GGT has additional residues not present

in most other GGTs at the C-terminal region of the L-subunit In E coli GGT, upon autocatalytic cleavage

of the peptide bond on the N-terminal side of Thr391, the C-terminal segment of the newly produced L-sub-unit flips away, with the result that the C-terminus of the L-subunit and the N-terminus of the S-subunit become quite distant from one another (> 35 A˚) [10] The present crystallographic analysis has revealed that the L-subunit C-terminal segment in the mature form

of B subtilis GGT is located close to the catalytic pocket, although the seven C-terminal residues (396– 402) are invisible The location of the L-subunit C-ter-minal segment in B subtilis GGT is similar to that of the E coli GGT precursor protein but distinct from that of the mature E coli GGT Hence, unlike other GGTs with known structures, it is assumed that

B subtilis GGT undergoes no significant structural change during maturation In B subtilis GGT, the seg-ment consisting of residues 391–395 undergoes no spe-cific interaction with neighboring residues

In summary, B subtilis GGT does not have the lid-loop motif, and the C-terminal segment of the newly

A

B

Fig 2 Glutamate binding in the catalytic pocket of GGT (A)

Elec-tron density map for the bound glutamate in B subtilis GGT An

omit F o – F c map for glutamate contoured at 2.0r (orange) is

overlaid on the stick models of GGT and the bound glutamate (B)

The glutamate-binding mode in E coli GGT The bound glutamate

and catalytic threonines are shown in orange and cyan,

respec-tively Dashed lines indicate hydrogen bonds.

produced L-subunit appears to be changed little after

autocatalytic processing Moreover, additional residues

at the L-subunit C-terminus are not involved in

shield-ing the active site pocket from the solvent; therefore,

the substrate⁄ product is exposed to solvent when

bound to the catalytic pocket As described above, for

E coliGGT it has been well established that the

cata-lytic reaction proceeds in the active site pocket, which

is shielded from solvent by the lid-loop, as well as by

release of the C-terminal segment from the active site

pocket upon autocatalytic processing The role of the

lid-loop is made possible by its flexible nature, which

allows it to adopt open or closed conformations

The structure of B subtilis GGT shows that neither

the lid-loop nor the alternative segment that covers

the active site pocket is present, prompting questions

about the role and significance of the lid-loop in GGT

catalysis

During the preparation of this article, the crystal

structures of Bacillus anthracis CapD, a GGT-related

enzyme, in the absence and presence of a glutamate

dipeptide were reported [19] B anthracis CapD

cata-lyzes the cleavage of the c-glutamyl bond but, unlike

GGTs, transfers the poly-c-d-glutamic acid to the

pep-tidoglycan cell wall, and is therefore involved in

link-ing the capsule of poly-c-d-glutamic acid to the

bacterial envelope [20] When the structure of CapD in

complex with di-a-l-glutamate peptide, a

nonhydrolyz-able analog of the substrate, is compared with that of

the B subtilis GGT–glutamate complex, it is apparent

that CapD is a member of the Ntn hydrolase

superfamily, like GGT Differences in structural char-acteristics between the two enzymes can be observed at the active sites CapD lacks the lid-loop, as seen in

B subtilis GGT, and therefore the ligand bound to CapD is exposed to solvent A notable difference between the two enzymes can be seen in the manner of

Fig 3 Comparison of the structures of GGTs from (A) B subtilis, (B) E coli and (C) H pylori The structure of each GGT is indicated in the upper panel The catalytic pocket is shown in the square box, and the molecular surface corresponding to this region is shown in the lower panel The bound glutamate molecule is depicted in each GGT with a space-filling model The region corresponding to the unique C-terminal segment of B subtilis GGT and the lid-loops of E coli and H pylori GGTs are shown as dark red and light green sticks, respectively The characters N and C indicate the N-terminus and C-terminus, respectively This figure was prepared with PYMOL [37].

Fig 4 Comparison of the binding modes of the ligands The struc-tures of B subtilis GGT and B anthracis CapD (Protein Data Bank ID: 3G9K) are shown in gray and brown, respectively Stick models

of the glutamate (orange) in GGT and the di-a-glutamate (purple) in CapD are shown Hydrogen bonds in GGT and in CapD are shown

in blue and orange, respectively.

ligand binding to the enzyme (Fig 4); there is little

correspondence in the amino acids that are involved in

the recognition of the functional groups of the ligands

Moreover, in GGT the a-carboxyl group of the

gluta-mate protrudes into the groove, whereas in CapD the

corresponding c-carboxyl group of the dipeptide

ana-log is skewed towards the surface This difference may

reflect the different sizes of the physiological

sub-strates; that is, the substrate of GGT is a small GSH,

whereas that of CapD is a huge polymer

Structural basis for the salt tolerance

B subtilusGGT is so salt-tolerant that it retains most

of its catalytic activity even in 3 m NaCl solution [16]

It has been reported that that the protein’s acidic

sur-face enhances its stability by increasing solvation

through increased water-binding capacity [21–23];

therefore, we analyzed its surface potential The

water-binding capacities of glutamate and aspartate have

been reported to be 7.5 and 6.0 molecules per amino

acid, respectively, whereas those for asparagine, serine

and threonine have been estimated to be 2.0 molecules

per amino acid [24]

B subtilis and E coli GGTs both have a negatively

charged surface (Fig 5A,B), whereas H pylori GGT

has positively charged patches globally distributed

across its molecular surface (Fig 5C), consistent with

the theoretical pI value (9.12) calculated from the

amino acid sequence Contrary to our expectation that

more negatively charged residues would be present on

the molecular surface of B subtilis GGT than on that

of E coli GGT, there was no significant difference in

surface potential between the two GGTs To better

understand the factors underlying the high salt

toler-ance, the effect of salt concentration on the enzyme

sur-face properties was assessed by solving the Poisson–

Boltzmann equation At high salt concentrations,

nota-bly different results were observed in the electrostatic

surface potentials between the two GGTs; in B subtilis

GGT, apparent negatively charged areas were

main-tained on the surface in the presence of 3 m monovalent

ion, whereas in E coli GGT, under the same

condi-tions, the negatively charged patches on the surface that

had been observed in the absence of salt had completely

disappeared The negatively charged areas of B subtilis

GGT under high-salt conditions even increased the

solvation, owing to increased water-binding capacity

This may allow the protein to remain in a hydrated

state, preventing the binding of inorganic cations in the

high-salt solution, and also preventing self-aggregation

B subtilis GGT may be applicable to the

manufac-ture of fermented food, because this enzyme possesses

A

B

C

B subtilis GGT (0 M NaCl)

90°

E coli GGT (0 M NaCl)

B subtilis GGT (3 M NaCl)

E coli GGT (3 M NaCl)

H pylori GGT (0 M NaCl)

Fig 5 Surface electrostatic properties of GGTs (A) Electrostatic potentials of B subtilis (upper panels) and E coli (lower panels) GGTs calculated using parameters without taking into account ion strength (B) Electrostatic potentials of B subtilis (upper panels) and E coli (lower panels) GGTs calculated for 3 M concentration of monovalent ion (C) The surface potential of H pylori GGT calculated using para-meters without taking into account ion strength The color scale ranges from )10 kT per electron (red) to +10 kT per electron (blue) The struc-tures are graphically depicted with the viewpoint looking down the cat-alytic pocket (right panels) or rotated 90 from this view (left panels).

not only c-glutamyl compound-degrading activity

(GGT activity) but also the steady glutaminase activity

[16] that converts glutamine into glutamic acid and

ammonia Decreasing the level of glutamine in

fer-mented foods improves the taste, as glutamine is

spon-taneously converted to slightly sour pyroglutamic acid

Although glutaminases from fungi such as

Aspergil-lus oryzae or Aspergillus sojae are applied to remove

the glutamine during the process of fermentation, the

activity of these glutaminases is seriously reduced by

the high salt concentration In contrast, halotolerant

B subtilis GGT could be used to increase the level of

glutamic acid, a major component of the desired taste,

at the same time decreasing the amount of glutamine,

even under high-salt conditions, by both its GGT

activity and its glutaminase activity The structural

basis for the salt tolerance presented here could be a

guide for further improvements in the usefulness of

B subtilisGGT by protein engineering

Experimental procedures

Cloning of the ggt gene into an expression vector

The ggt gene from B subtilis was amplified by PCR from the

plasmid pCY167 (Suzuki H & Yamada C, Unpublished),

using forward primer 5¢-CATATGGATGAGTACAAACA

AGTAGATG-3¢ and reverse primer 5¢-GGATCCTCGAG

CTCATTTACGTTTTAAATTAATGCCGAT-3¢

(underlin-ed sequences indicate NdeI and BamHI sites, respectively)

The PCR product was initially subcloned into pTA2 (Toyobo,

Osaka, Japan), and the sequence was confirmed As the

origi-nal ggt sequence has one NdeI site in the middle, we

intro-duced a synonymous mutation into this site, using the

Quikchange Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La

Jolla, CA, USA) with forward primer 5¢-GAAACGATGC

primer 5¢-GACGCACGGTCGGCATAGGACAAATGCA

TCGTTTC-3¢ The sequence of the second PCR product was

also confirmed Following the digestion of the second PCR

product with NdeI and BamHI, the DNA fragment containing

the ggt gene was ligated into the pCold-I vector (Takara

Bio, Shiga, Japan), and pCold I–His6–ggt was subsequently

generated

Overproduction and purification of B subtilis

GGT

The pCold I–His6–ggt expression vector was transformed

into E coli C41(DE3) [25] The transformant was grown at

37C in 3.6 L (900 mL · 4) of liquid TB containing

ampi-cillin (50 lg⁄ mL) to an attenuance of 0.6 at 600 nm At

this stage, expression of the N-terminal His-tagged GGT

15C, and then adding 1 mm isopropyl-b-d-thiogalactopyr-anoside After induction, the transformant was cultured at

15C for 30 h The cells were harvested, resuspended in

50 mm Tris⁄ HCl (pH 7.8) containing 20 mm imidazole, and disrupted by sonication The soluble fraction was mixed with His-select resin (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA), and the N-terminal His-tagged GGT was purified by batch method according to the manufacturer’s protocol Fractions contain-ing GGT were collected and concentrated with ammonium sulfate at 70% saturation The precipitate was dissolved in

50 mm Tris⁄ HCl (pH 7.8), and was then subjected to gel filtration using a HiPrep 16⁄ 60 Sephacryl S-200 HR column (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) All purification

were monitored by absorption at 280 nm and GGT activity [26], and purity was confirmed by SDS⁄ PAGE

Crystallization of B subtilis GGT

Vivaspin filter (GE Healthcare) All crystallization trials were performed at 4C, using the hanging-drop vapor-diffusion method Crystallization drops containing 1 lL of protein solu-tion in 20 mm Hepes (pH 7.8) and 0.5 mm l-glutamate, and

1 lL of precipitant solution, were equilibrated against 200 lL

of precipitant solution The initial trials were performed using the following commercially available sparse-matrix screening kits: Crystal Screen I, II and Lite, PEG⁄ Ion screen (Hampton Research, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA), Wizard I–III (Emerald BioSystems, Bainbridge Island, WA, USA), and JB screen 1–6 (Jena Bioscience GmbH, Jena, Germany)

The crystallization trials produced small crystals in sev-eral drops containing poly(ethylene glycol) as a precipitant (e.g PEG⁄ Ion screen, tube nos 10, 11, 13 and 14; Wiz-ard III, tube no 10; JB screen 3, C2) The crystals were improved using Additive Screen (Hampton Research), and the conditions were then manually optimized using home-made solutions The best crystals of His6–GGT were grown

in the drop containing a 1 : 1 mixture of protein solution

l-glutamate] and reservoir solution [poly(ethylene gly-col) 4000, 100 mm Mes (pH 7.0), 600 mm NaCl, and

dimensions of 0.05· 0.1 · 0.4 mm in 1 week

Data collection for B subtilis GGT

The crystals were transferred to a reservoir solution con-taining 15% (v⁄ v) glycerol as a cryoprotectant for a few seconds, and then flash-cooled in a cryostream at )180 C

To measure the GGT crystals, we used a goniometer head with a large arc to alter the rotation axis of the mounted crystal; because the spaces between reciprocal points along the c*-axis were so small, it was necessary to choose a rota-tion axis nearly parallel to the c-axis to avoid overlapping

of the diffraction spots on a frame derived from the

adja-cent reciprocal lattice planes Intensity datasets were

collected at the BL38B1 station of the SPring-8 (Hyogo,

Japan), using the oscillation method on an ADSC Q210

detector (Area Detector Systems Corporation, Poway, CA,

USA) with synchrotron radiation (k = 1.000 A˚) The

crys-tal-to-detector distance was 200 mm; 1470 images were

recorded at 0.1 intervals, with an exposure time of 15 s per

image The intensity data were processed and scaled with

xds[27] The results of the data collection are summarized

in Table 1

Structure determination for GGT

When we reached the stage of solving the phase problem,

we learned that the coordinates for substrate-free B subtilis

GGT had been deposited by Sharath et al at the RCSB

Protein Data Bank (2V36) Because their crystal form was different from ours, we applied the molecular replacement method to solve our crystal structure, using their coordi-nates as the search probe Rotational and translational searches of the diffraction data (15.0–4.0 A˚ resolution), per-formed using molrep [28] from the ccp4 package, located two crystallographically independent molecules in an asym-metric unit The structure was subjected to rigid-body refinement for 25–3.0 A˚ resolution data, using cns [29] The structure was further refined at 1.95 A˚ resolution with the cns simulated annealing protocol, and this was fol-lowed by energy minimization and individual temperature-factor refinements; manual model building was performed with xfit [29a] The electron density map at this stage was clear enough for exact assignment of the orientations of the two glutamates in the asymmetric unit, and the model was unambiguously fitted to the Fo–Fc map of the substrate-binding pocket of each molecule The ordered water mole-cules were added to the model using the cns water-pick and water-delete functions Finally, energy minimization and temperature-factor refinements were applied to the model Although the crystallization drops contain 600 mm NaCl, the electron densities and the temperature factors of the picked atoms indicated that neither sodium ion nor chloride ion was bound to this GGT Structure refinement statistics are summarized in Table 1 Atomic coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the RCSB Pro-tein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org) under accession number 3A75

The software programs used were as follows: promotif [30] for secondary structure assignment, procheck [31] for the validity of the final model, and lsqman [32] for super-position and rmsd values of the structures The electrostatic potentials of the molecular surface were calculated with pbeq-solver [33], which uses the Poisson–Boltzmann equa-tions module from the biomolecular simulation program

Acknowledgements

We thank S Baba, N Mizuno and T Hoshino for their assistance with data collection using the synchro-tron radiation at SPring-8 (Hyogo, Japan) The syn-chrotron radiation experiments were performed at BL38B1, SPring-8, with the approval of the Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (Proposal

No 2008B1079) We also thank M Sugishima of Kurume University for valuable comments and sugges-tions, and N Kaseda of Osaka University for technical assistance This work was supported by a grant from the Japan Foundation for Applied Enzymology (to

K Fukuyama), Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research

21380059 (to H Suzuki), 20370037 (to K Fukuyama) and 21770112 (to K Wada) from the Ministry of

Table 1 Crystallographic data and refinement statistics (values in

parentheses are for the outermost shell).

Crystallographic data

Cell parameters (A ˚ ) a = 49.4, b = 98.9, c = 227.9

Resolution range (A ˚ ) 25.0–1.95 (2.02–1.95)

Refinement statistics

Disordered regionsd

Molecule A

Molecule B

rmsd from ideal values

Average B-factor (A˚2) 23.3

Ramachandran plot

Additionally allowed (%) 8.8

Generously allowed (%) 0.0

a Rsym= P

hkl

P

i |Ii(hkl ) – <I(hkl )>| ⁄ P

hkl P

i Ii(hkl ), where <I(hkl )> is the average intensity over equivalent reflections.

b Rcryst= P

||Fobs(hkl )| – |Fcalc(hkl )|| ⁄ P

|Fobs(hkl )|.

c Rfreeis the R-value calculated for 5% of the dataset not included

in the refinement.

d

Numerals shown are invisible residue numbers.

e Glu423, which corresponds to Asn411 in E coli GGT, in the two

crystallographically independent molecules.

Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of

the Japanese Government, and a research grant from

Towa Food Research Foundation (to H Suzuki)

References

1 Tate SS & Meister A (1981) c-Glutamyl transpeptidase:

catalytic, structural and functional aspects Mol Cell

Biochem 39, 357–368

2 Mehdi K & Penninckx MJ (1997) An important role

for glutathione and c-glutamyltranspeptidase in the

supply of growth requirements during nitrogen

starva-tion of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Microbiology

143, 1885–1889

3 Martin MN, Saladores PH, Lambert E, Hudson AO &

Leustek T (2007) Localization of members of the

c-glut-amyl transpeptidase family identifies sites of glutathione

and glutathione S-conjugate hydrolysis Plant Physiol

144, 1715–1732

4 Suzuki H, Kumagai H & Tochikura T (1986)

c-Glutam-yltranspeptidase from Escherichia coli K-12: formation

and localization J Bacteriol 168, 1332–1335

5 Taniguchi N & Ikeda Y (1998) c-Glutamyl

transpepti-dase: catalytic mechanism and gene expression Adv

Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol 72, 239–278

6 Ohkama-Ohtsu N, Fukuyama K & Oliver DJ (2009)

Roles of c-glutamyl transpeptidase and c-glutamyl

cyclotransferase in glutathione and

glutathione-conjugate metabolism in plants Adv Bot Res 52,

87–113

7 Suzuki H & Kumagai H (2002) Autocatalytic

process-ing of c-glutamyltranspeptidase J Biol Chem 277,

43536–43543

8 Okada T, Suzuki H, Wada K, Kumagai H &

Fukuyama K (2006) Crystal structures of

c-glutamyl-transpeptidase from Escherichia coli, a key enzyme in

glutathione metabolism, and its reaction intermediate

Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 6471–6476

9 Boanca G, Sand A, Okada T, Suzuki H, Kumagai H,

Fukuyama K & Barycki JJ (2007) Autoprocessing of

Helicobacter pyloric-glutamyltranspeptidase leads to

the formation of a threonine–threonine catalytic dyad

J Biol Chem 282, 534–541

10 Okada T, Suzuki H, Wada K, Kumagai H &

Fukuyama K (2007) Crystal structure of the

c-glutamyl-transpeptidase precursor protein from Escherichia coli

Structural changes upon autocatalytic processing and

implications for the maturation mechanism J Biol

Chem 282, 2433–2439

11 Wada K, Hiratake J, Irie M, Okada T, Yamada C,

Kumagai H, Suzuki H & Fukuyama K (2008) Crystal

structures of Escherichia coli c-glutamyltranspeptidase

in complex with azaserine and acivicin: novel

mechanis-tic implication for inhibition by glutamine antagonists

J Mol Biol 380, 361–372

12 Williams K, Cullati S, Sand A, Biterova EI & Barycki

JJ (2009) Crystal structure of acivicin-inhibited c-glut-amyltranspeptidase reveals critical roles for its C-termi-nus in autoprocessing and catalysis Biochemistry 48, 2459–2467

13 Morrow AL, Williams K, Sand A, Boanca G & Barycki

JJ (2007) Characterization of Helicobacter pylori c-glut-amyltranspeptidase reveals the molecular basis for sub-strate specificity and a critical role for the

tyrosine 433-containing loop in catalysis Biochemistry

46, 13407–13414

14 Uchiyama I (2007) MBGD: a platform for microbial comparative genomics based on the automated con-struction of orthologous groups Nucleic Acids Res 35, D343–D346

15 Minami H, Suzuki H & Kumagai H (2003) A mutant Bacillus subtilisc-glutamyltranspeptidase specialized in hydrolysis activity FEMS Microbiol Lett 224, 169–173

16 Minami H, Suzuki H & Kumagai H (2003) Salt-tolerant c-glutamyltranspeptidase from Bacillus subtilis 168 with glutaminase activity Enzyme Microb Technol 32, 431–438

17 Duggleby HJ, Tolley SP, Hill CP, Dodson EJ, Dodson

G & Moody PC (1995) Penicillin acylase has a single-amino-acid catalytic centre Nature 373, 264–268

18 Oinonen C, Tikkanen R, Rouvinen J & Peltonen L (1995) Three-dimensional structure of human lysosomal aspartylglucosaminidase Nat Struct Biol 2, 1102–1108

19 Wu R, Richter S, Zhang RG, Anderson VJ, Missiakas

D & Joachimiak A (2009) Crystal structure of Bacillus anthracistranspeptidase enzyme CapD J Biol Chem

284, 24406–24414

20 Richter S, Anderson VJ, Garufi G, Lu L, Budzik JM, Joachimiak A, He C, Schneewind O & Missiakas D (2009) Capsule anchoring in Bacillus anthracis occurs by

a transpeptidation reaction that is inhibited by capsidin Mol Microbiol 71, 404–420

21 Frolow F, Harel M, Sussman JL, Mevarech M & Shoham M (1996) Insights into protein adaptation to a saturated salt environment from the crystal structure of a halophilic 2Fe–2S ferredoxin Nat Struct Biol 3, 452–458

22 Premkumar L, Greenblatt HM, Bageshwar UK, Savchenko T, Gokhman I, Sussman JL & Zamir A (2005) Three-dimensional structure of a halotolerant algal carbonic anhydrase predicts halotolerance of a mammalian homolog Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 7493–7498

23 Grochowski P & Trylska J (2008) Continuum molecular electrostatics, salt effects, and counterion binding –

a review of the Poisson–Boltzmann theory and its modi-fications Biopolymers 89, 93–113

24 Kuntz ID (1971) Hydration of macromolecules IV Polypeptide conformation in frozen solutions J Am Chem Soc 93, 516–518

25 Miroux B & Walker JE (1996) Over-production of

pro-teins in Escherichia coli: mutant hosts that allow

synthe-sis of some membrane proteins and globular proteins at

high levels J Mol Biol 260, 289–298

26 Suzuki H, Kumagai H & Tochikura T (1986)

c-Glutam-yltranspeptidase from Escherichia coli K-12: purification

and properties J Bacteriol 168, 1325–1331

27 Kabsch W (1993) Automatic processing of rotation

diffraction data from crystals of initially unknown

sym-metry and cell constants J Appl Crystallogr 26, 795–800

28 Vagin A & Teplyakov A (2000) An approach to

multi-copy search in molecular replacement Acta Crystallogr

D Biol Crystallogr 56, 1622–1624

29 Bru¨nger AT, Adams PD, Clore GM, DeLano WL,

Gros P, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Jiang JS, Kuszewski J,

Nilges M, Pannu NS et al (1998) Crystallography &

NMR system: a new software suite for macromolecular

structure determination Acta Crystallogr D Biol

Crystallogr 54, 905–921

29a McRee DE (1999) XtalView⁄ Xfit – a versatile program

for manipulating atomic coordinates and electron

den-sity J Struct Biol 125, 156–165

30 Hutchinson EG & Thornton JM (1996) PROMOTIF:

a program to identify and analyze structural motifs in

proteins Protein Sci 5, 212–220

31 Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS & Thornton

JM (1993) PROCHECK: a program to check the ste-reochemical quality of protein structures J Appl Crys-tallogr 26, 283–291

32 Kleywegt GJ & Jones TA (1994) A super position ESF⁄ CCP4 Newslett 31, 9–14

33 Jo S, Kim T, Iyer VG & Im W (2008) CHARMM-GUI: a web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM J Comput Chem 29, 1859–1865

34 Brooks BR, Brooks CL 3rd, Mackerell AD Jr, Nilsson L, Petrella RJ, Roux B, Won Y, Archontis G, Bartels C, Boresch S et al (2009) CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program J Comput Chem 30, 1545–

1614

35 Thompson JD, Higgins DG & Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weight-ing, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice Nucleic Acids Res 22, 4673–4680

36 Gouet P, Courcelle E, Stuart DI & Metoz F (1999) ESPript: analysis of multiple sequence alignments in PostScript Bioinformatics 15, 305–308

37 DeLano WL (2002) PyMOL DeLano Scientific, San Carlos, CA