tuberculosis fdxA Rv2007c promoter was selected for this analysis as it is a member of the DevR regulon and harbours a solitary upstream DevR binding motif [5] containing the consensus C
Trang 1the Dev box impairs protein–DNA interaction and
abrogates DevR-mediated gene induction in
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Rajesh Kumar Gupta, Santosh Chauhan* and Jaya Sivaswami Tyagi
Department of Biotechnology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Introduction
Tuberculosis is the single most prevalent infectious
dis-ease among humans and accounts for one-seventh of
all deaths worldwide The success of
Mycobacte-rium tuberculosis as a pathogen is closely associated
with its ability to persist in humans for extended
peri-ods without causing disease It is estimated that
one-third of the global population harbours latent
M tuberculosis infection which can last for years and even decades without causing active disease [1,2] This enormous reservoir of latent disease greatly compli-cates efforts aimed at tuberculosis control as it requires prolonged drug therapy presumably due to persistence
Keywords
DevR (or DosR); DNA–protein interaction;
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Correspondence
J S Tyagi, Department of Biotechnology,
All India Institute of Medical Sciences,
New Delhi-110029, India
Fax: +91 11 2658 8663
Tel: +91 11 2658 8491
E-mail: jstyagi@aiims.ac.in
*Present address
Department of Cancer Biology, MD
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas,
USA
(Received 16 November 2010, revised 15
April 2011, accepted 19 April 2011)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08130.x
The DevR response regulator mediates adaptation of Mycobacterium tuber-culosis to various signals that are likely to be encountered within the host such as hypoxia, nitric oxide, carbon monoxide and ascorbic acid DevR is proposed as a promising target for developing drugs against dormant bac-teria It induces the expression of target genes by interacting with DNA motifs located in their promoter regions An understanding of DNA–pro-tein interactions is expected to facilitate the development of inhibitors tar-geting DevR Only three amino acids in DevR, namely Lys179, Lys182 and Asn183, directly contact nucleotide bases in the DNA motif The present study was designed to decipher the contribution of Lys182 in DevR func-tion M tuberculosis fdxA (Rv2007c), a member of the DevR regulon, was selected for this analysis Its transcriptional start point was mapped at )1
or )2 with respect to the putative translational start site suggesting that fdxA is expressed as a leaderless mRNA DNase I footprinting led to the discovery of a secondary binding site and induction of the fdxA promoter
is explained by the cooperative binding of DevR to two binding sites Mutation of Lys182 lowers the DNA binding affinity of DevR and abro-gates induction of fdxA and other regulon genes Mutational analyses also highlight the singular importance of Lys182–G13 nucleotide interaction for DevR binding and regulon induction Our findings demonstrate that impairment of Lys182-mediated interactions alone abolishes DevR function and provide valuable insights for designing molecules that interfere with DevR-mediated dormancy adaptation
Abbreviations
EMSA, electromobility shift assay; GFP, green fluorescent protein; qRT-PCR, quantitative real time RT-PCR; TSP, transcription start point;
WT, wild type.
Trang 2of the dormant tubercle bacilli that are refractory to
current treatment regimens [2,3]
Dormancy adaptation is characterized by the
cessa-tion of active bacterial growth and the transicessa-tion into
a non-replicative persistent state An understanding of
the molecular basis of dormancy is a prerequisite for
the identification of novel molecules in dormant
organ-isms that can be targeted by new drugs In vitro
mod-els have provided valuable insights into the genetic
programmes utilized by M tuberculosis during
dor-mancy adaptation [4] Transcription represents the first
and the most crucial step in gene regulation in
prok-aryotes and in vitro exposure of M tuberculosis to
physiologically relevant stimuli such as hypoxia, NO,
CO and ascorbic acid triggers a dormancy adaptive
response that is initiated by the DevR transcriptional
regulator [5–10] DevR mediates the rapid upregulation
of 48 M tuberculosis genes that comprise the DevR
regulon [5,11–13] This regulator has been proposed as
a key participant in the dormancy programme of
M tuberculosis and consequently it is potentially
important as a target for novel drug development
[14,15] This hypothesis is supported by the
demonstra-tion of blocking of the DevR pathway by a small
inhibitor molecule that also prevented hypoxia-induced
bacterial dormancy in vitro [16] Therefore a fine
understanding of the properties of DevR will
undoubt-edly be invaluable for designing potent inhibitor
molecules
The analysis of the crystal structure of the DevRC
-terminal domain complex with a 20-bp oligonucleotide
representing the consensus binding motif revealed that
a DevR dimer interacts with each DNA motif A
con-served sequence, G4G5G6A7C8T9, present in each half
palindrome is recognized by a subunit of the DevR
dimeric protein Only three amino acids per subunit,
namely Lys179, Lys182 and Asn183, contact
nucleo-tide bases in the binding motif [17] To elucidate the
functionality of DNA–DevR protein interactions, the
present study was designed to decipher the
contribu-tion of Lys182 (K182) to the DNA binding property
of DevR Lys182 is thought to participate in exclusive
H-bonding interactions with the O6 and N7 atoms of
G13 (complementary to the conserved C8 base on the
sense strand) and the N7 atom of A12(complementary
to the conserved T9base on the sense strand [17]) The
M tuberculosis fdxA (Rv2007c) promoter was selected
for this analysis as it is a member of the DevR regulon
and harbours a solitary upstream DevR binding motif
[5] containing the consensus C8and T9nucleotides that
were predicted to interact specifically with Lys182
resi-due in DevR fdxA encodes a putative ferredoxin
pro-tein Ferredoxins are small, acidic proteins containing
iron–sulphur clusters which act as multifunctional elec-tron carriers in diverse redox systems It has been sug-gested that M tuberculosis FdxA protein may serve the tubercle bacteria as an electron carrier under hypoxia [18] or that it may play a role in maintaining DevS in its reduced functional state [19] During the present study, we discovered the presence of a low-scoring DevR binding site in the fdxA promoter in addition to the previously predicted site DevR binds cooperatively to the second site to induce fdxA pro-moter transcription Through mutational analysis of protein and DNA (in a half-site of the primary binding motif), we highlight the singular importance of G13– Lys182 and partial importance of A12–Lys182 inter-action for DevR binding and function Our results establish that abrogation of interactions mediated by a single amino acid, namely Lys182, with the primary binding site is alone sufficient to abolish specific DNA–protein interactions and downstream gene induction
Results
Transcription start point mapping of fdxA
In order to understand the relevance of DevR interac-tion to transcripinterac-tion, the transcripinterac-tion start point (TSP) was mapped by primer extension analysis using RNA isolated from aerobic and hypoxia-induced
M tuberculosis cultures fdxA TSP was mapped at )1
or )2 with respect to the putative translational start site of FdxA under hypoxic conditions (Fig 1) Based
on previously described consensus sequences [20,21], SigA- and SigC-like promoter elements were mapped upstream of the TSP
fdxA promoter has a conserved architecture of two DevR binding sites located upstream of its TSP
The fdxA gene is a member of the DevR regulon The members of this regulon often have two or more DevR binding sites in their upstream regions [5,11–13,22] In this context, the fdxA promoter is noteworthy because only a single upstream DevR binding site was pre-dicted for this gene [5] However, DNase I footprinting analysis of the wild-type (WT) fdxA promoter region revealed the presence of two binding sites (Fig 2A), the previously predicted site P [5] and a newly identi-fied adjacent site S that was proximal to the TSP and was not identified previously by in silico analysis While both the binding sites were occupied at ‡ 0.5 lm concentration, binding to a single site was not
Trang 3observed at lower protein concentration (not shown) Four enhanced DNase I cleavage sites were detected within the DevR-bound region at an apparently periodic interval (indicated by arrowheads in Fig 2A) The results of DNase I footprinting and TSP mapping indicate that DevR interacts cooperatively with the P and S sites and that the )35 promoter element partially overlaps with the secondary DevR binding site, S
DevR K182G mutant protein is defective for interaction with DNA
The phosphorylation and DNA binding properties of purified WT and K182G mutant DevR proteins were compared Both the proteins were phosphorylated with equivalent efficiency in vitro and therefore a phosphor-ylation defect in the mutant protein was ruled out (Fig 3A) Electromobility shift assay (EMSA) analysis was performed with phosphorylated WT or K182G mutant DevR proteins and fdxA promoter DNA WT DevR protein bound to fdxA promoter DNA over a narrow range (< 10-fold) of protein concentration; at
500 nm concentration > 90% saturation of DNA was observed with WT DevR protein while no binding was observed with mutant protein up to 1.0 lm concentra-tion (Fig 3B, lanes 5 and 12, respectively) Partial binding of the mutant protein with fdxA promoter DNA was noted at higher protein concentration (up to 6.0 lm) suggesting that the overall conformation of the DNA binding domain was preserved relative to the
WT protein However, the mutant protein failed to
Fig 1 TSP mapping The fdxA TSP (shown by arrow) was mapped
using RNA isolated from aerobic (A) and hypoxic (H) cultures and
fdxA tsp primer DNA sequence of the fdxA promoter region (anti
sense strand) The bent arrow (at T, T) indicates the fdxA TSP
mapped in the present study The primary, P, and secondary, S,
DevR binding sites that were identified by DNase I footprinting
(Fig 2) are boxed Putative )35 and )10 SigC and SigA promoter
consensus elements are indicated below the relevant sequences.
The first boxed GTG codon represents the translational initiation
site annotated in TubercuList (http://tuberculist.epfl.ch) Additional
putative translational initiation codons are boxed.
Fig 2 DNase I footprinting (A) DNase I footprint of WT DevR protein (0.5 l M and 1.0 l M concentration) and fdxA promoter DNA containing
WT ⁄ C 8 G ⁄ T 9 A mutant P box DNA sequencing ladder of the same sequence is shown alongside the footprint The footprints were analysed
by the lane detection tool and lane profile graphs (red, no protein added; green, with 0.5 l M DevR; orange, with 1.0 l M DevR) were gener-ated using QUANTITYONE software (Bio-Rad) Arrowheads correspond to enhanced DNase I cleavage sites in the DevR binding region The sequences of the WT and C8G or T9A mutant P boxes are shown above the corresponding footprints (B) DNase I footprint of K182G DevR mutant protein and WT fdxA promoter DNA.
Trang 4bind to the P and S sites in the fdxA promoter (up to
6.0 lm protein concentration) in a DNase I
footprint-ing assay This property established that the K182G
mutant protein was defective in sequence-specifc
inter-action (Fig 2B)
M tuberculosis expressing either K182G or
K182A mutant DevR protein is defective in DevR
regulon response
The effect of K182 mutation on gene activation was
assessed by quantitative real time RT-PCR
(qRT-PCR) analysis of selected DevR regulon genes in
iso-genic M tuberculosis strains expressing WT or DevR
K182G mutant protein An induction defect was noted
in the expression of Rv3134c, devR, fdxA and tgs1
genes in the mutant strain under hypoxia (Fig 3C)
A very feeble ( twofold) induction of hspX was
observed in the mutant strain in contrast to > 80-fold
induction in WT bacteria However, hypoxic expres-sion of HspX protein was observed only in M tubercu-losis cultures expressing WT DevR protein and not in those expressing mutant protein (not shown) The induction defect in DevR K182G-expressing M tuber-culosis cultures is attributed to the decreased binding
of mutant protein at target promoters Moreover, because DevR expression is under positive autoregula-tion [11], inducing levels of the regulator are probably not attained in the mutant strain to overcome the binding defect of K182G DevR The functional impor-tance of K182 residue in gene activation was confirmed
in a second isogenic mutant strain that expresses DevR K182A version of mutant protein (Fig 3C) Although not tested experimentally, a similar mechanism is a likely explanation for the expression defect in this mutant strain as well
C8base in the P box is crucial for DevR interaction and essential for fdxA promoter activation The experiments described above establish the impor-tance of K182 residue in the functionality of DevR Because K182 residue in DevR was reported to contact
G13 and A12bases in the DNA motif (complementary
to C8and T9bases, respectively, in the P box [17]), the relevance of this interaction was confirmed by analy-sing the binding of WT DevR protein with mutant fdxA promoter fragments harbouring these mutations
in the P binding site Comparative EMSA analysis of the interaction of DevR protein with the fdxA pro-moter containing either WT or mutated P box sequences revealed that the C8G mutant DNA was defective in binding At 0.4 lm DevR concentration, binding to the C8G mutant box was observed to be substantially reduced and to the T9A mutant box reduced to a lesser extent (Fig 4A) The double mutant (C8G + T9A) was also defective in binding as expected (not shown) The results of EMSA analysis were supported by DNase I footprinting analysis and the C8G mutation was observed to be more deleterious than the T9A mutation indicating that the C8 nucleo-tide is important for interaction with Lys182 of DevR (Fig 2A) A comparison of the footprints and their profiles shows that the C8mutation in the P box abol-ished the binding of DevR to both the P and S boxes
at 0.5 lm protein concentration From DNase I foot-printing and EMSA results, we infer that DevR binds cooperatively to two sites at the fdxA promoter and that C8base in the P box is crucial for interaction The functional relevance of the mutations resulting
in a binding defect was assessed by green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter assay using M tuberculosis
Fig 3 (A) Phosphorylation of WT and K182G mutant DevR
pro-teins with DevS 201 P (phosphorylated cytoplasmic domain of
DevS) Lane 1, DevSP; lane 2, DevSP and DevR K182G mutant
protein; and lane 3, DevSP and WT DevR protein The top panel
represents the phosphorimage and the bottom panel the
Coomas-sie stained gel (B) EMSA with phosphorylated DevR (WT or K182G
mutant) and fdxA WT promoter DNA Left, lanes 1 to 9 contain 0.1,
0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9 l M of WT DevR protein; lane 10
represents free DNA; lanes 11 and 12 contain 0.5 and 1.0 l M of
K182G mutant DevR protein (C) qRT-PCR analysis of DevR regulon
gene expression RNA was isolated from M tuberculosis cultures
expressing either WT DevR protein or DevR K182G or DevR K182A
mutant protein and subjected to gene expression analysis.
Mean ± SD fold induction under hypoxia from two to four
indepen-dent cultures is shown.
Trang 5strains harbouring the WT and mutant fdxA
promot-ers (C8G, T9A and C8G + T9A in the P box)
Although both mutant promoter DNAs were partially
defective in binding to DevR in vitro (Fig 4A), the
fdxA promoter carrying the C8G mutation was
com-pletely defective in the hypoxic induction of promoter
activity while the T9A mutation was partially defective
( 50%, Fig 4B) As expected the doubly mutated
promoter DNA was also completely defective in
pro-moter activation These results establish that a single
mutation (C8G) in one-half of the P box results in a
defect in DevR binding to DNA and abolishes
DevR-regulated gene induction
Discussion
Only three amino acid residues, namely Lys179,
Lys182 and Asn183, that are located in the a9 helix of
each DevR subunit, directly contact G4G5G6A7C8T9
bases in each half-binding site of a DevRC–DNA com-plex [17] We recently showed that natural substitution
at position G4is tolerated while G5, G6and C8 nucleo-tides are well conserved in the interacting boxes of DevR-dependent promoters [12,13] The conserved C8
base does not interact directly with DevR; however,
G13in the complementary DNA strand at this position hydrogen bonds with Lys182 Lys182 also hydrogen bonds with the A12base in the complementary strand The precise contribution of individual amino acids in DevR to its function can be assessed by mutational studies It is expected that this type of analysis will reveal the interaction(s) that are crucial for DevR function and thereby guide the rational development
of inhibitors to DevR, a target that is believed to play
a key role in the hypoxia-induced bacterial dormancy programme In the present study, the role of Lys182 was analysed because it exclusively interacts with only two bases in each half-site of DNA, namely G13 and
A12, the former being complementary to the highly conserved C8nucleotide Furthermore, in silico analysis shows that the binding pocket in the crystal structure that interacts with a DevR inhibitor contains Lys182 [16] The importance of Lys182 residue in DevR func-tion was assessed in vitro and in vivo using DevR K182G or K182A mutant protein and fdxA promoter harbouring mutations in C8 or⁄ and T9 base in the pri-mary DevR binding site, P The expression of the DevR regulon genes was severely compromised by mutation of this amino acid in DevR The partial binding defect with the fdxA promoter carrying a C8 mutant P box was associated with a complete loss in promoter activity and further established the essential role of K182 in DevR function In contrast, a partial binding defect with the T9 mutant P box was associ-ated with 50% promoter activity The functional importance of C8 nucleotide for DevR interaction is reflected in the positional conservation of C8 but not the T9 nucleotide in binding motifs [5,12,13] The mutant proteins analysed in the present study contain glycine or alanine in place of K182 in the WT protein wherein the side chain amino group of K182 residue in each subunit is involved in H-bonding with O6and N7 atoms of G13 and with the N7 atom of A12 in the DNA strand In silico analysis of WT versus K182 mutant DevR protein reveals the loss of three K182-mediated H bonds in the mutant protein which is apparently sufficient to destabilize the remaining inter-actions and results in the reduced affinity of mutant DevR protein for specific DNA sequences that was observed in the present study
DNase I footprinting analysis of the fdxA promoter reveals some important binding properties of DevR A
Bound
Free
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.0 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.0 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.0
WT P Box C8G P Box T9A P Box
DevR~P (µ M )
A
B
Fig 4 (A) EMSA analysis using WT DevR protein and fdxA
WT ⁄ C 8 G ⁄ T 9 A promoter DNA A representative result from three
experiments is shown (B) GFP fluorescence of M tuberculosis
cul-tures expressing WT DevR protein and harbouring either WT or
mutant fdxA promoter in GFP reporter vector GFP fluorescence
was assessed in standing cultures in 96-well format and expressed
as relative fluorescence units divided by A (mean ± SD of two
inde-pendent experiments, each in triplicate wells).
Trang 6new DevR binding site (designated as S) was identified
downstream and adjacent to the previously assigned P
site Mutational analysis established that protein
bind-ing to the S site is dependent on its bindbind-ing to the P
site In this regard the fdxA promoter displays an
architectural similarity to tgs1 and some other DevR
regulon promoters [12,13] The presence of prominent
DNase I cleavage sites in the protected region suggests
that bound DevR may induce localized DNA
bend-ing⁄ distortion and thereby facilitate cooperative
pro-tein–protein interaction at the fdxA promoter Our
observations are consistent with the bending of DNA
observed in DevRC–DNA crystals [17] Note that we
have analysed DevR binding to a natural target
pro-moter containing a strong and a weak binding site
each while the crystal structure was elucidated using
consensus DNA oligonucleotides Many DevR regulon
promoters contain a combination of strong and weak
binding sites [12,13] Taking into consideration the
results of DNase I footprinting analysis and in vivo
assays, it appears that DNA bending⁄ distortion is
cru-cial for recruiting DevR cooperatively to weak binding
sites and for target promoter induction Keeping in
mind the overlap of a DevR binding site with the)35
promoter element at target promoters, it is possible
that DevR-induced changes in DNA conformation
may also facilitate interactions between bound DevR
molecules and RNA polymerase
TSP mapping reveals the presence of a
hypoxia-inducible transcriptional start site at)1 or )2 position
with respect to the putative translational start site of
fdxA (as annotated in TubercuList,
http://tubercu-list.epfl.ch) which suggests that the fdxA transcript is a
leaderless mRNA There are numerous examples
of leaderless mRNA in eubacteria and archaea [23]
A leaderless fdx mRNA encoding ferredoxin was
reported in Halobacterium salinarium where the TSP
mapped at )1 position in relation to the translational
start site [24] It has been suggested that leaderless
mRNAs may be preferentially translated under
adverse conditions like carbon source downshift,
stationary phase etc [25] It is not known whether
translational control of leaderless mRNAs in M
tuber-culosis is similar to that in Escherichia coli; however,
based on the assumption that similar mechanism(s) are
employed, it is possible that the leaderless fdxA
mRNA is efficiently translated in M tuberculosis
under conditions of hypoxic stress Additional
in-frame GTG codons were detected downstream of
the +1 GTG initiation codon and, although no
SD-like sequences were detectable, we cannot exclude the
possibility that any one of them is utilized in the
initi-ation of transliniti-ation of FdxA
In conclusion, the results of mutational analysis of protein and DNA establish the singular importance of
G13–Lys182 H-bonding in DevR–DNA interaction and for downstream gene induction events It is hoped that these insights will advance the rational development of specific inhibitors of DevR
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains and growth conditions
All M tuberculosis strains were revived from)80 C bacte-rial stocks and grown in Dubos medium containing 0.1% Tween-80 and 10% (v⁄ v) albumin dextrose complex (DTA medium) All cultures were grown at 37C in a shaker incubator (190–220 r.p.m using an Innova Shaker 4230) unless mentioned otherwise Plasmids used in this study are shown in Table 1
Overexpression and purification of recombinant DevR K182G mutant protein
Lysine to glycine or alanine mutation at position 182 of DevR was introduced by site-directed mutagenesis in plas-mid pSC1 which expresses WT DevR protein in pGEX4T1 vector using mutagenic primers (Table 2) and Pfu Turbo DNA polymerase (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA) The amplified product was digested with DpnI enzyme and then transformed into E coli XL-1 Blue The generation of the site-specific mutation was confirmed by DNA sequencing
WT and K182G mutant DevR proteins were purified from
E colias described previously [11]
Generation of G13, A12and double (G13+ A12) mutant DNA boxes in fdxA promoter
Mutant M tuberculosis fdxA promoter GFP reporter con-structs bearing G13 or A12or G13+ A12 mutations in the
P box were generated by site-directed mutagenesis in plas-mid pSG1 (Table 2) All mutations were confirmed by DNA sequencing
EMSA
EMSAs were performed as described previously [11] Briefly,32P-labelled fdxA promoter DNA (WT and mutant) fragments were generated by PCR from M tuberculosis H37Rv DNA using oligonucleotide primers fdxA f and fdxAr (Table 2) DevR protein (WT or K182G mutant) was purified as described previously [11] and phosphory-lated DevR was prepared using acetyl phosphate as described previously [11] Varying concentrations of phos-phorylated WT or K182G mutant DevR protein were incu-bated with 2 ng of the labelled fdxA promoter DNA (WT
Trang 7or mutant) on ice for 30 min DNA–protein complexes were separated by non-denaturing PAGE and the DNA– protein complexes were visualized by phosphorimaging The fraction of bound DNA was estimated using quantity onesoftware (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA)
DNase I footprinting of fdxA promoter
DNase I footprinting assays were performed with phos-phorylated WT DevR protein and fdxA promoter DNA variants (WT and mutant) or K182G mutant DevR protein and WT fdxA promoter DNA as described earlier [11]
TSP mapping
RNA was isolated from M tuberculosis H37Rv cultures grown in DTA medium under aerobic shaking and standing
Table 2 Primers used in the study Underlined bases indicate the
introduced mutations.
fdxA-C8G-A9T f TGACGAATAAGGCGATTGGTCCTTTCC
fdxA-C8G-A9T r GGAAAGGACCAATCGCCTTATTCGTCA
Table 1 Plasmids used in the study.
pSC-DevR pGEX4T1 overexpressing WT DevR with a glutathione S-transferase
N-terminal tag
[11]
pRG-K182G DevR pSC-DevR encoding DevR containing lysine to glycine mutation at amino
acid residue182
This study pSM POperondevR pJFR19 integrative vector containing WT devR sequences expressed from
its native operon promoter
S D Majumdar, PhD thesis submitted
to AIIMS, 2010 pRG POperonK182G devR pSM PoperondevR encoding DevR containing lysine to glycine mutation
at amino acid residue182
This study
pRG P Operon K182A devR pSM P operon devR encoding DevR containing lysine to alanine mutation at
amino acid residue182
This study pFPV27 E coli Mycobacterial shuttle plasmid with promoterless gfp; Km r [27]
pSG1 pFPV27 containing WT fdxA promoter ( )191 to +30) cloned upstream
of gfp
S Ghosh, M Biotech dissertation, AIIMS, 2008
pRG3 pSG1 containing C8G + T9A mutation in P box of fdxA promoter This study
Table 3 Strains used in the study.
M tuberculosis Mut2 M tuberculosis H37Rv strain with a 447-bp BalI deletion
in devR coding region
[28]
M tuberculosis Comp13 Plasmid pSM POperondevR electroporated in
M tuberculosis Mut2 (expressing WT DevR)
S D Majumdar, PhD thesis submitted
to AIIMS, 2010
M tuberculosis DevR Mut K182G pRGOperonK182G devR electroporated in M tuberculosis Mut2 This study
M tuberculosis DevR Mut K182A pRG Operon K182A devR electroporated in M tuberculosis Mut2 This study
M tuberculosis GFP empty vector Plasmid pFPV27 electroporated in M tuberculosis H37Rv strain This study
M tuberculosis fdxA Plasmid pSG1 electroporated in M tuberculosis H37Rv This study
M tuberculosis Mut fdxA G13 Plasmid pRG1 electroporated in M tuberculosis H37Rv This study
M tuberculosis Mut fdxA A12 Plasmid pRG2 electroporated in M tuberculosis H37Rv This study
M tuberculosis Mut fdxA G13 + A12 Plasmid pRG3 electroporated in M tuberculosis H37Rv This study
Trang 8conditions (48 h) as described previously [11] TSPs were
mapped using 32P-labelled fdxA tsp primer (Table 2) and
30 lg of RNA from aerobic and standing cultures (twice
using two separate lots of RNA) The reactions were run
alongside the sequence ladder generated using the same
pri-mer and M tuberculosis H37Rv DNA The gel was dried
and visualized by phosphorimager (Bio-Rad) as described
previously [11]
GFP reporter assay
M tuberculosis H37Rv harbouring pSG1, pRG1, pRG2,
pRG3 reporter plasmids carrying WT and mutant fdxA
pro-moter sequences (Table 3) were grown in DTA medium to
mid-logarithmic phase (D595 0.4) under shaking
condi-tions The cultures were diluted to D595 0.025 and
dispensed in 200-lL aliquots per well in 96-well plates The
plates were incubated for up to 5 days and GFP fluorescence
was measured as described previously [11] GFP fluorescence
due to promoter activity was calculated by subtracting
back-ground fluorescence of the promoter-less vector and is
expressed as relative fluorescence units divided by D
Construction of M tuberculosis strains
expressing DevR K182G or DevR K182A and their
RNA analysis
Plasmid pSM POperondevR containing WT devR sequences
(Table 1) was used as template to generate K182G or K182A
mutation in DevR using K182G f and K182G r or K182A f
and K182A r primers (Table 2) Plasmids expressing mutant
DevR proteins were electroporated into a devR deletion
mutant to generate mutant M tuberculosis strains in H37Rv
background (Table 3) M tuberculosis strains were cultured
in DTA medium under aerobic (0 day) and hypoxic (5 days
standing) conditions as described earlier [26] RNA was
isolated (two separate lots) from the strains expressing WT
or mutant DevR proteins and analysed by qRT-PCR for the
expression of selected DevR regulon genes
Acknowledgements
J S T is grateful to the Department of Biotechnology
(DBT), Government of India, for research funding and
for a Tata Innovation Fellowship R K G is grateful
to DBT for a PDF and IYBA fellowship and to DST
for project funding under the Fast Track scheme
References
1 Corbett EL, Watt CJ, Walker N, Maher D, Williams
BG, Raviglione MC & Dye C (2003) The growing burden
of tuberculosis: global trends and interactions with the
HIV epidemic Arch Intern Med 163, 1009–1021
2 Parrish NM, Dick JD & Bishai WR (1998) Mechanisms
of latency in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Trends Micro-biol 6, 107–112
3 Sacchettini JC, Rubin EJ & Freundlich JS (2008) Drugs versus bugs: in pursuit of the persistent predator Myco-bacterium tuberculosis Nat Rev Microbiol 6, 41–52
4 Shiloh MU & DiGiuseppe Champion PA (2010) To catch a killer What can mycobacterial models teach us about Mycobacterium tuberculosis pathogenesis? Curr Opin Microbiol 13, 86–92
5 Park HD, Guinn KM, Harrell MI, Liao R, Voskuil
MI, Tompa M, Schoolnik GK & Sherman DR (2003) Rv3133c⁄ dosR is a transcription factor that mediates the hypoxic response of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Mol Microbiol 48, 833–843
6 Voskuil MI, Schnappinger D, Visconti KC, Harrell MI, Dolganov GM, Sherman DR & Schoolnik GK (2003) Inhibition of respiration by nitric oxide induces a Mycobacterium tuberculosisdormancy program J Exp Med 198, 705–713
7 Ohno H, Zhu G, Mohan VP, Chu D, Kohno S, Jacobs
WR Jr & Chan J (2003) The effects of reactive nitrogen intermediates on gene expression in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Cell Microbiol 5, 637–648
8 Shiloh MU, Manzanillo P & Cox JS (2008) Mycobacte-rium tuberculosissenses host-derived carbon monoxide during macrophage infection Cell Host Microbe 3, 323–330
9 Kumar A, Deshane JS, Crossman DK, Bolisetty S, Yan
BS, Kramnik I, Agarwal A & Steyn AJ (2008) Heme oxygenase-1-derived carbon monoxide induces the Mycobacterium tuberculosisdormancy regulon J Biol Chem 283, 18032–18039
10 Taneja NK, Dhingra S, Mittal A, Naresh M & Tyagi
JS (2010) Mycobacterium tuberculosis transcriptional adaptation, growth arrest and dormancy phenotype development is triggered by vitamin C PLoS ONE 5, e10860
11 Chauhan S & Tyagi JS (2008) Cooperative binding of phosphorylated DevR to upstream sites is necessary and sufficient for activation of the Rv3134c-devRS operon in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: implication in the induction of DevR target genes J Bacteriol 190, 4301–4312
12 Chauhan S & Tyagi JS (2008) Interaction of DevR with multiple binding sites synergistically activates divergent transcription of narK2-Rv1738 genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis J Bacteriol 190, 5394–5403
13 Chauhan S & Tyagi JS (2009) Powerful induction of divergent tgs1-Rv3131 genes in Mycobacterium tuber-culosisis mediated by DevR interaction with a high-affinity site and an adjacent cryptic low-high-affinity site
J Bacteriol 191, 6075–6081
14 Saini DK & Tyagi JS (2005) High-throughput microplate phosphorylation assays based on
Trang 9DevR-DevS⁄ Rv2027c 2-component signal transduction
pathway to screen for novel antitubercular compounds
J Biomol Screen 10, 215–224
15 Murphy DJ & Brown JR (2007) Identification of gene
targets against dormant phase Mycobacterium
tuberculo-sisinfections BMC Infect Dis 7, 84
16 Gupta RK, Thakur TS, Desiraju GR & Tyagi JS (2009)
Structure-based design of DevR inhibitor active against
nonreplicating Mycobacterium tuberculosis J Med Chem
52, 6324–6334
17 Wisedchaisri G, Wu M, Rice AE, Roberts DM,
Sherman DR & Hol WG (2005) Structures of
Mycobacterium tuberculosisDosR and DosR-DNA
complex involved in gene activation during adaptation
to hypoxic latency J Mol Biol 354, 630–641
18 Ricagno S, de Rosa M, Aliverti A, Zanetti G &
Bolognesi M (2007) The crystal structure of FdxA, a
7Fe ferredoxin from Mycobacterium smegmatis
Biochem Biophysic Res Commun 360, 97–102
19 Ioanoviciu A, Meharenna YT, Poulos TL & Ortiz de
Montellano PR (2009) DevS oxy complex stability
identifies this heme protein as a gas sensor in
Myco-bacterium tuberculosisdormancy Biochemistry 48,
5839–5848
20 Agarwal N & Tyagi AK (2006) Mycobacterial
tran-scriptional signals: requirements for recognition by
RNA polymerase and optimal transcriptional activity
Nucl Acids Res 34, 4245–4257
21 Sun R, Converse PJ, Ko C, Tyagi S, Morrison NE &
Bishai WR (2004) Mycobacterium tuberculosis ECF
sigma factor SigC is required for lethality in mice and
for the conditional expression of a defined gene set Mol Microbiol 52, 25–38
22 Florczyk MA, McCue LA, Purkayastha A, Currenti E, Wolin MJ & McDonough KA (2003) A family of acr-coregulated Mycobacterium tuberculosis genes shares
a common DNA motif and requires Rv3133c (dosR or devR) for expression Infect Immun 71, 5332–5343
23 Moll I, Grill S, Gualerzi CO & Blasi U (2002) Leaderless mRNAs in bacteria: surprises in ribosomal recruitment and translational control Mol Microbiol 43, 239–246
24 Pfeifer F, Griffig J & Oesterhelt D (1993) The fdx gene encoding the [2Fe–2S] ferredoxin of Halobacterium salinarium(H halobium) Mol Gen Genet 239, 66–71
25 Moll I, Hirokawa G, Kiel MC, Kaji A & Blasi U (2004) Translation initiation with 70S ribosomes: an alternative pathway for leaderless mRNAs Nucleic Acids Res 32, 3354–3363
26 Majumdar SD, Sharma D, Vashist A, Kaur K, Taneja
NK, Chauhan S, Challu VK, Ramanathan VD, Bala-sangameshwara V, Kumar P et al (2010) Co-expression
of DevR and DevR(N)-Aph proteins is associated with hypoxic adaptation defect and virulence attenuation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis PLoS ONE 5, e9448
27 Valdivia RH, Hromockyj AE, Monack D, Ramakrish-nan L & Falkow S (1996) Applications for green fluo-rescent protein (GFP) in the study of host-pathogen interactions Gene 173, 47–52
28 Parish T, Smith DA, Kendall S, Casali N, Bancroft GJ
& Stoker NG (2003) Deletion of two-component regula-tory systems increases the virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infect Immun 71, 1134–1140