In Brazil, visceral leishmaniasis VL is caused by Leishmania infantum chagasiandshowsawideterritorial dis-tributionamongareas ofdifferentgeographic,climaticand socialaspects.1Dogsarecons
Trang 1Pleasecitethisarticleinpressas:GuimarãesA,etal.SerosurveyforcaninevisceralleishmaniasisinruralandurbanareasoftheBrazilian LegalAmazon.BrazJInfectDis.2016.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2016.10.013
ARTICLE IN PRESS
BJID-682; No.ofPages2
brazjinfectdis2016;x x x(x x):xxx–xxx
w w w e l s e v i e r c o m / l o c a t e / b j i d
The Brazilian Journal of
Letter to the editor
Serosurvey for canine visceral leishmaniasis in
rural and urban areas of the Brazilian Legal
Amazon
Dear Editor:
Leishmaniasisisaworldwidezoonoticdisease,transmitted
by phlebotomine species, causing tegumental and visceral
injuries In Brazil, visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is caused by
Leishmania infantum chagasiandshowsawideterritorial
dis-tributionamongareas ofdifferentgeographic,climaticand
socialaspects.1Dogsareconsideredimportantreservoirsof
thediseaseandplayanimportantroleinhumaninfection
Ingeneral,mostofthemareasymptomatic.However,
clini-calsignsininfecteddogsincludecachexia,hairloss,dermal
wounds,weightloss,lymphadenopathy,andlethargy.2
There are very few studies related to canine visceral
leishmaniasis(CVL) intheLegal Amazon region,mainly in
Tocantinsstateandepidemiologicalsurveysarethebasisfor
thediseasecontrolprograms.In2008and2009,thestateof
Tocantis recorded oneofthe highestprevalence, with36.8
and33casesper100,000inhabitants,respectively.In2010,21
municipalitiesinTocantinswereconsideredapriorityregion
inefforts ofVL surveillanceand control.3 Thus, this study
aimedtoinvestigateepidemiologicalvariablesassociatedwith
canineleishmaniasisassessedbyserologyinruralandurban
areaofAraguaína,TocantinsState
Blood samples were collected from 204 dogs from
dif-ferentplaces ofAraguaína city,selectedbynon-probability
convenience, regardless of gender, breed, or age A total
of99 dogs were sampled from 10 villages and rural
prop-erties (Fazenda Nossa Senhora de Fátima, Fazenda Serra
dasPalmeiras,PovoadoNovoHorizonte,PovoadoJacilândia,
Chácara Triângulo, Entroncamento Babaculândia, Fazenda
Amazonas, Povoado Floresta, Fazenda Boa Vista, Povoado
Arac¸ulândia), and 105 dogs from nine urban areas (Vila
CoutoMagalhães,Tiúba,SetorPalmas,TeresaHilário,Senador,
AraguaínaSul,SãoJoão,Barros).Samplecollectionwas
con-ductedinagreementwiththeEthicalPrinciplesforResearch
underinstitutionalwatchoftheTropicalMedicineFoundation
ofTocantinsEthicalCommittee
Prior to blood collection, the dog owners signed an
informed consent form and answered a standardized
questionnaireaimingtoidentifypossiblerisk factors
asso-ciated withthe disease.Information collected of the dogs
included gender, age, breed, major type of environment
(indoor/outdoor), cleaning frequency of animal’s area, and location
Serumsamplesweresubmittedtoindirect immunofluores-centassay(IFA)withantigensofLeishmania chagasi,adopting
40asthecutofftiterforpositivity.4Possiblestatistical asso-ciationbetweenepidemiologicaldataandtheoccurrenceof
Leishmaniaspp.antibodieswereanalyzedbychi-square(2)or Fischer’sexacttest,adopting5%asthelevelofsignificance.All theanalyseswereperformedbyusingBioEstat5.3software Fromthe 204samplestested,67.15%(n=137)turnedout positive,57.4%(n=58)fromruraldogsand82.9%(n=79)from urbandogs(p<0.05).Anti-Leishmania chagasiantibodieswere detectedinallruralpropertiesandurbanneighborhoodsof thestudy.Seropositivityratevariedfrom28.6to70%inrural area and from 33 to 90% inurban area Theonlyvariable significantly associated with seropositivity was location of theneighborhoodintheurbanarea(p<0.05).Dogslivingin Tiúba,SetorPalmas,TeresaHilário,Senador,AraguaínaSul, andSãoJoãohadsignificantlyhigherchancetobeseropositive
toL chagasi inrelationtodogs livinginVilaCouto Magal-hãesandBarros(p<0.05).Dogslivinginenvironmentswith daily,weekly,ornocleaningwasnotariskfactorforbeing seropositive(p>0.05).Likewise,theurbananimalsremaining outdoormostofthedaywasnotariskfactor(p>0.05).Outdoor ruraldogshadahigherseropositivityrate(60.5%),compared
toindoorruralanimals(50%),butthisdifferencewasnot sig-nificant(p=0.41).Indoorurbandogshadaseropositiverate (78.4%)similartooutdoorurbandogs(73.5%).Age(≤6months;
>6monthsand≤2years;>2to≤5years;>5years),gender,and breed(pureormongrel)werenotassociatedtopositiveresults Thehigh rateofpositivityforCVL foundinthe present study, bothinrural (57.4%) and urbanarea (82.9%), under-scoresthefactthatalthoughthediseasemaintainsitsrural characteristics, nowadays its urbanization can be widely noticed.Inaddition,resultssuggestthatdogslivinginurban areasaremoreexposedtovectorsthanthoselivinginrural areasand mightbeassociatedtoeco-environmental condi-tions.Thehigherpositivityratefoundintheneighborhoods
oftheurbanareaareprobablyrelatedtopoormaintenance
ofthehouses,lowsocioeconomicconditions,andpresence
of trees and other vegetation nearby, as it was regularly observed
Trang 2Pleasecitethisarticleinpressas:GuimarãesA,etal.SerosurveyforcaninevisceralleishmaniasisinruralandurbanareasoftheBrazilian LegalAmazon.BrazJInfectDis.2016.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2016.10.013
ARTICLE IN PRESS
BJID-682; No.ofPages2
Thelackofstatisticalassociationofpositiveresultsand
age,sex,andbreedareinaccordancewithpreviousreports.5
Althoughcleaningfrequencywasnotsignificant,itisknown
thataccumulationoforganicmatteraswellasdomesticwaste
deservesspecialattentioninordertoavoidtheproliferation
ofphlebotominesthatneedorganicmattertocompletetheir
lifecycle.5Similarly,outdoororindoorbreedingdidnotshow
statisticalassociation,butnonethelessshouldbeconsidered
onceoutdoorenvironmentpermitshighercontactwithvector
ecologicalniche
InBrazil,VLisconsideredanendemicdisease,though
out-breaksoccurmoreorlessoftenduetopoorimmuneresponse
ofhostsandtoanecoepidemiologicalscenariothatfavorsthe
proliferationofinfectedvector populations.5 Theresultsof
the presentstudy highlight theimportance ofCVLin both
ruralandurbanareasofTocantinsandindicatetheneedfor
effectiveVLsurveillanceandcontrolmeasuresintheregion
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest
Acknowledgements
Theauthorsgratefullyacknowledgethescholarshipsgranted
byCNPq (National Councilfor Scientificand Technological
Development).Wealsothankthelaboratorysupportoffered
byLucéliaA.Santos,LeandroL.Nepomuceno,andLarissaM.B
Moraes
r e f e r e n c e s
1.HarhayMO,OlliaroPL,CostaDL,CostaCH.Urbanparasitology:
visceralleishmaniasisinBrazil.TrendsParasitol.2011;27:403–9
2.BanethG,ArochI.Canineleishmaniasis:adiagnosticand
clinicalchallenge.VetJ.2008;175:14–5
3.DATASUS/D.2.5Taxadeincidênciadaleishmaniose visceral/TaxadeincidênciaporUnidadedaFederac¸ão/Unidade
daFederac¸ão:Tocantins/Período:2012/Availablefrom: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/tabcgi.exe?idb2012/d0205.def Accessed:Aug.02,2016
4.CamargoME.Introduc¸ãoàstécnicasdeImunofluorescência RevBrasPatolClín.1974;10:143–69
5.BritoFG,LangoniH,SilvaRC,RotondanoTEF,MeloMA,PazGS CaninevisceralleishmaniasisintheNortheastRegionof Brazil.JVenomAnimToxinsInclTropDis.2016;22:15
AndresaGuimarãesa,JulianaMacedoRaimundoa, HelciléiaDiasSantosb,RosangelaZacariasMachadoc, CristianeDivanBaldania , ∗
aUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ), Instituto
de Veterinária, Departamento de Medicina e Cirurgia Veterinária, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil
bUniversidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT), Escola de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Araguaína, TO, Brazil
cUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Departamento de Patologia Veterinária, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
∗Corresponding author.
E-mailaddress:crisbaldani@gmail.com(C.D.Baldani) Received4October2016
Accepted5October2016 1413-8670/
©2016SociedadeBrasileiradeInfectologia.Publishedby ElsevierEditoraLtda.Thisisanopenaccessarticleunderthe
CCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2016.10.013 Availableonlinexxx