1. Trang chủ
  2. » Giáo án - Bài giảng

prevalence antibiotic susceptibility and characterization of antibiotic resistant genes among carbapenem resistant gram negative bacilli and yeast in intestinal flora of cancer patients in north lebanon

5 0 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề Prevalence, Antibiotic Susceptibility and Characterization of Antibiotic Resistant Genes Among Carbapenem Resistant Gram Negative Bacilli and Yeast in Intestinal Flora of Cancer Patients in North Lebanon
Tác giả Rima Christophy, Marwan Osman, Hassan Mallat, Marcel Achkar, Azzam Ziedeh, Walid Moukaddem, Fouad Dabboussi, Monzer Hamze
Trường học University of Libanese
Chuyên ngành Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
Thể loại Research Article
Năm xuất bản 2017
Thành phố Tripoli
Định dạng
Số trang 5
Dung lượng 444,19 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Antibiotic resistance in cancer patientsJ. Carbapenem resistance among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in a tertiary care hospital in south India.. Factors associated to preva

Trang 1

Contents lists available atScienceDirect

Journal of Infection and Public Health

j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e :h t t p : / / w w w e l s e v i e r c o m / l o c a t e / j i p h

Prevalence, antibiotic susceptibility and characterization of antibiotic

resistant genes among carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli

and yeast in intestinal flora of cancer patients in North Lebanon

Rima Christophya, Marwan Osmana, Hassan Mallata, Marcel Achkarb, Azzam Ziedehc,

Walid Moukaddemc, Fouad Dabboussia, Monzer Hamzea,∗

a r t i c l e i n f o

Keywords:

Cancer

Yeasts

Carbapenemases

Colonization

a b s t r a c t

Theemergenceandspreadofcarbapenem-resistantbacteriaareasignificantclinicalandpublichealth concern.Theaimofthestudyistodeterminetheprevalenceofintestinalcarriageof carbapenem-resistantbacteriaandyeastsincancerpatientsunderchemotherapy.41stoolsamplescollectedfrom cancerpatientsinNinihospitalinTripoli,NorthLebanonhavebeenanalyzed.Afterisolatingyeastsand carbapenem-resistantbacteria,abiochemicalidentificationandantimicrobialsusceptibilityprofilewere determined.Themechanismofenzymaticcarbapenem-resistancewasdetectedbysearchingfor car-bapenemasesbybothHodgetestandPCRassays.Theassociationofseveralmechanismsofresistance wasalsosearched.46.3%(19/41)ofpatientswerecolonizedbyyeast.Candidaglabrata(6/19)wasthe majorspecies.Theprevalenceofcarbapenem-resistantbacteriawas24.4%(10/41)includingEscherichia coli(5/10),Enterobactercloacae(1/10),Enterobacteraerogenes(1/10)Edwardsiellahoshinae(1/10) Pan-toeaagglomerans(1/10)andPseudomonasstutzeri(1/10).PCRandsequencingoftheamplifiedfragments revealedthatPseudomonasstutzeri(1/1)carriedVIMgeneandEnterobacteraerogenes(1/1)andE.coli (1/5)carriedOXA-48gene.TheotherEnterobacteriaceaewereresistanttocarbapenemsbymechanisms otherthanacarbapenemaseincludinghyperproductionofcephalosporinase(4/10),extendedspectrum beta-lactamases(1/10)andbothcephalosporinaseandextendedspectrumbeta-lactamases(2/10).High prevalenceofintestinalcarriageofcarbapenem-resistantbacteriaandyeastsweredetectedincancer patientsunderchemotherapy.Inordertopreventthedevelopmentofendogenousinfectionandthe disseminationofantimicrobialresistance,animplementationofantibioticstewardshipprogramsand infectioncontrolmeasuresisrequiredinhospitalsparticularlyinthedepartmentofchemotherapy

©2017TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierLimited.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCC

BY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Introduction

Cancerpatientsareatincreasedriskofinfectioneitherbecause

theyhaveadeficiencyoftheimmunefunction[1]eitherbecause

ofchemotherapyorradiotherapywhichinduceneutropenia[2]

Theprophylacticantibioticuseisastandardpracticeinpatients

withneutropeniaafterchemotherapy[3].Disruptionoftheflora

ofthegastrointestinaltractisthencreated.Inaddition,treatment

withbroad-spectrumantibioticsincreasestheriskofcandidiasis

byincreasingtheconcentrationofCandidaspp.in the

testinal tract[4] The integrity of the mucousmembranes that can be damaged by the use of cytotoxic chemotherapy agents alsorepresenta riskfactorforthedevelopmentoffungal infec-tions in these patients [5] Potentially pathogenic bacteria are abletocolonize theintestinewhich leadstoa vicious circleof treatmentsandtheemergenceofnewbacteriaresistantto antibi-oticsincludingcarbapenem-resistantspecies[6].Carbapenemsare oftenused totreatinfections caused byenterobacteria produc-ingextended-spectrum␤-lactamases(ESBL)orcephalosporinase [7].Theydifferfromother␤-lactamsbytheirpost-antibioticeffect againstGram-negativebacteria[8].Unfortunately,theprevalence

of Enterobacteriaceae producing carbapenemases increasedover thelasttenyearswhich seriouslyleadstoatreatmentimpasse andachallengeinthetreatmentofnosocomialinfections[7].Two http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2016.10.009

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).

Trang 2

mechanismsof resistanceare described, theacquisition of

car-bapenemases genesthat encode enzymescapableof degrading

carbapenemsoroverexpressionofß-lactamasesthathaveavery

lowaffinityforthecarbapenemssuchascephalosporinaseandESBL

traitalongwithoutermembraneporinlossorhyper-expressionof

effluxpumps[9,10]

Ontheotherhand,theadequateantibiotictherapyisakeyissue

inmultidrugresistantbacteriamanagement.Severalstudieshave

shownthatcancerpatientsinfectedwithresistantbacteriamore

oftenreceiveinadequateinitialempiricalantibiotictherapy,which

mayimpairoutcomes,increasemortalityandprolong

hospitaliza-tion[11].Therefore,theaimofthisstudywastodeterminethe

prevalenceofcarriageofcarbapenem-resistantbacteriaandyeasts

intheintestinalfloraofcancerpatientsunderchemotherapy

Samplesanddatacollection

41cancerpatientswereincludedinthis study,28were

suf-feringfromsolidtumorsand13withmalignantblooddisorders

ThesepatientsaretreatedatNinihospitalinTripoli,NorthLebanon

Astandardquestionnairewascompletedinordertoobtain

infor-mationincludingtheage,gender,typeofcancer,dateofdisease

diagnosis,surgicaloperationsinrelationtocancerand

microbio-logicalhistory.41stoolsampleswerecollectedbetweenFebruary

andJuly2014andtransportedquicklytothelaboratoryina

ther-mostaticallycontrolledcontainer

Yeastisolationandantifungalsusceptibility

IsolationofyeastswasmadebycultureofstoolonSabouraud

agar (Pronadisa®—Spain) supplemented with chloramphenicol

(0.5g/l)followedbyincubation for24hat37◦C.The

identifica-tionwasconductedbytheuseofAuxacolorTM2(BioRad®—France)

Thedeterminationofthesensitivityofdifferentisolatesto

antifun-galswasmadeusingFungitestTM (BioRad®—France)accordingto

themanufacturer’srecommendedprocedures

Isolationofcarbapenem-resistantbacteria

Isolationafterenrichmentmethod

An amount of stool in the volume of a pea is

intro-duced in a volume of 5ml of enrichment Tryptic Soy Broth

(Scharlau®—Spain) supplemented by an antifungal Nystatin

(2500IU/l)(Medistan®—Lebanon)andadiscofertapenemof10␮g

(BioRad®—France)andthenincubatedfor24hat37◦C.10␮lofthis

suspensionisthenspreadonMacConkeyagar(Liofilchem®—Italy)

followedbyincubationfor24hat37◦C[12]

Directisolationmethod

Anamountofstoolinthevolumeofapeaisintroducedina

volumeof5mlofsteriledistilledwater.10␮lofthissuspension

isinoculatedontoMacConkeyagarsupplementedbyertapenem

(Invanz®—Canada)withaconcentrationof1mg/landwithNystatin

(2500IU/L)andthenincubatedfor24hat37◦C

Biochemicalidentificationandresistancepattern

The identificationof Enterobacteriaceae and oxidase-positive

Gram-negativebacilli wascarriedoutthroughtheuseof RapID

ONE (Remel®—USA) and RapID NF (Remel®—USA), respectively

The susceptibility to antibiotics of strains resistant to at least

one carbapenem was performed by the disk diffusion

accord-ing to “Comité de l’Antibiogramme de la Société Franc¸aise de

Table 1

TTACTGCCCGTTGACGCCC

GAGCACTTCTTTTGTGATGGC

ATGCTGGCCTTGGGGAACG

CGAATGCGCAGCACCAG

CCTCTCAATGGTGTGGGT

ACGAATTCGAGCATCACCAG

AACTAYCCAATAYRTAAC

CTGACAGTTACCAATGCTTA

TGGGTRAARTARGTSACCAGA

TTAGCGTTGCCAGTGCTC

AGTGTGTTTAGAATGGTGATC

TAACTTGACCGACAGAGG

GGGYSGCTTAGATAGTGCTGAT

Microbiologie—EuropeanCommitteeonAntimicrobial Susceptibil-ity(CASFM—EUCAST)recommendations

For thedetectionof a cephalosporinase,Müller–Hintonagar withcloxacillin(0.25g/l)wasused.Discsofertapenem,imipenem, meropenem, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, cefepime and aztreonam were used This test was repeatedonMüller–Hintonagarwithoutcloxacillin After incu-bationfor 24hat 37◦C, thediameter of inhibition zoneswere compared betweenbothMüller–Hinton agar,withandwithout cloxacillin.Forthedetectionofacarbapenemase,theHodgetest wasperformed[13].Thesameprocedurewasrepeatedfor Pseu-domonasstrainsbyusingimipenem(10␮g)insteadofertapenem DetectionofcarbapenemasesandESBLgenes

BacterialDNAwasextractedbyGenEluteTMBacterialGenomic DNA Kit (Sigma–Aldrich®—USA) The Protocol followed is the oneproposedbythemanufacturer Thegeneamplification was carried out by the thermal cycler (MycyclerTM Thermal cycler, Biorad—France)usingtheprimersdescribedinTable1

Results

46.3% (19/41) of patients were infected withyeast Candida glabrata(C.glabrata)(6/19)wasthemajorspeciesfollowedby Can-didaalbicans(2/19),Candidainconspicua(2/19),Candidatropicalis (1/19),Candidaparapsilosis(1/19)and7strainswerenon identifi-able.Table2expressesthevariousantifungalsusceptibilityprofile Theprevalenceofcolonizationofbacteriaresistantto carbapen-emsincancerpatientsunderchemotherapyinNorthLebanonwas

Trang 3

IsolatedstrainswereEscherichiacoli(5/10), Enterobactercloacae

(1/10),Enterobacteraerogenes(1/10),Edwardsiellahoshinae(1/10),

Pantoeaagglomerans(1/10)andPseudomonasstutzeri(1/10).Note

thatonly2strainsofcarbapenem-resistantbacteriaweredetected

bybothmethodsused.Table3expressesthepercentageof

sensi-tivitytoantibioticsfor10carbapenem-resistantstrains

Moreover,outof10strainsresistanttocarbapenems,3were

positiveforHodgetest.2(E.aerogenesandE.coli)ofthemharbored

OXA-48geneandthethirdone(P.stutzeri)harboredVIMgene

InadditiontoOXA-48,E.colialsocontainCTX-Mgene.Theother

carbapenem-resistantstrainshadanoverproduced

cephalospori-naseand/orESBL(Table4)

Discussion

Carbapenem-resistantbacteria areassociated withincreased

morbidity and mortality and are capable of silently colonizing

the digestive tract The present study shows a high

preva-lenceofcarbapenem-resistantbacteriaintestinalcarriage(24.4%)

in cancerpatients under chemotherapy in Nini hospital, North

Lebanon.Recentstudyshowedahighincidenceand prevalence

of carbapenem-resistantEnterobacteriaceae (CRE) intestinal

car-riageinaMexicantertiarycarehospital,particularlyinhematologic

malignancypatients[21].Inaddition,Tischendorfetal.[22]

sug-gestedanoverall16.5%riskofinfectionwithCREamongstpatients

colonizedwithCRE

RegardingthedetectionofGramnegativebacilliresistantto

car-bapenems,resultshaveshownthattheisolationmethodproposed

bytheCentersforDiseaseControl(CDC)failedtodetect4strains

detectedbythemethodofdirectisolationonMacConkeyagar

sup-plementedbyertapenem.Severalauthorsfounddifferencesinthe

detectionofthecolonizationofcarbapenemasesproducingstrains

betweenthemethodsused[23–25].Themajormechanismof

resis-tancedetectedin ourstudywasoverexpressionof ß-lactamase

(cephalosporinaseorESBL)withaproblemofimpermeability

Ourrecentstudy,alsoperformedinNinihospital,including2767

Enterobacteriaceaeisolatesduringtheperiod2008–2012showed

thatamong7enterobacterialresistantspeciestocarbapenem,88%

producedOXA-48carbapenemasewiththepredominanceofE.coli

(73%)[26].Inaddition,thisstudyshowedanincreaseintherateof

CREcolonizationwhichwas0.4%between2008and2010and1.6%

in2012[26].Anotherstudyinthesamehospitalfrom2006to2013

showedthat46%ofP.aeruginosastrainswithdecreasedsensitivity

toimipenemwereharboringblaVIM-2gene[27]

Ontheotherhand,astudyconductedintheUnitedStatesin

2013onthecolonizationofcarbapenemsresistantstrainsof18

patientswithmalignantblooddiseaseshasshownthatthe

major-ityofisolatedstrainswereKlebsiellapneumoniae(14strains)andE

cloacae(3strains).Themechanismofresistancewasrelatedtothe

productionofKPCandCTX-M-15enzymesincombination with

outer-membraneporinloss[28].Furthermore,athirdstudy

per-formedin2014in Colombiaon45cancerpatientsshowedthat

KPCgenewasmorefrequentininfections(82.3%)comparingto

colonization(17.7%)[29]

Withregardtothescreeningforyeast,ourstudyshowedthat

C.glabratawasthemajorspecieswhichisin agreementwitha

studyconductedinGermanyin1999on116patientswithacute

leukemia[30].C glabratawasreportedaspredominantspecies

(51%),followedbyC.albicans(18%)andC.krusei(4%)[30].Areview

of37reportsincluding1591casesofsystemicCandidainfection

amongoncologypatientsshowedtheimportanceofnon-albicans

Candida.46%ofcaseswereduetonon-albicansCandidasuchas

C.tropicalis(25%),C.glabrata(8%),C.parapsilosis(7%),andC.krusei

(4%)[31].Moreover,severalstudieswereconductedinLebanon Table

Trang 4

Table 3

E coli E coli E coli E coli E coli E aerogenes E cloacae E hoshinae P agglomerans Pseudomonas stutzeri

S, sensitive; I, intermediate; R, resistant; nd, not determined.

AMP, ampicillin (10 ␮g); AMC, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20/10 ␮g); TIC, ticarcillin (75 ␮g); TCC, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (75/10 ␮g); PIP, piperacillin (30 ␮g); PPT, piperacillin/tazobactam (30/4 ␮g); ATM, aztreonam (30 ␮g); IMP, imipenem (10 ␮g); MEM, meroprnem (10 ␮g); ERT, ertapenem (10 ␮g); CEF, cefalotin (30 ␮g); CXM, cefuroxim (30 ␮g); FOX, cefoxitin (30 ␮g); CFM, cefixim (5 ␮g); CTX, cefotaxime (5 ␮g); FEP, cefepime (30 ␮g); CAZ, ceftazidime (30 ␮g); GMN, gentamicin (10 ␮g); TMN, tobramycin (10 ␮g); AKN, amikacin (30 ␮g); NET, netilmicin (10 ␮g); PI, pipemidic acid (20 ␮g); OFX, ofloxacin (5 ␮g); CIP, ciprofloxacin (5 ␮g); SXT, trimetho-prim/sulfamethoxazole (1,25/23,75 ␮g); CS, colistin (50 ␮g); TGC, tigecyclin (15 ␮g); FSF, fosfomycin (200 ␮g).

Phenotypic and genotypic test for carbapenems resistant Gram negative bacilli.

Strains Hodge test Cephalosporinase inhibition Carbapenemases genes ESBL genes

KPC IMI NMC-A SME GES IMP VIM NDM-1 OXA-48

nd, not determined.

albi-cansstrains,12%wereresistanttoitraconazole,6%toketoconazole,

7.7%tovoriconazole,1.7%toamphotericinB,and5%tofluconazole

AnotherinvestigationconductedbyBitaretal.[33]hasshowna

sig-nificantandrapidlevelofincreasedresistancetoamphotericinB

(37.6%),eventhoughitsuseislimitedinLebanonduetoitstoxicity

Conclusion

Inconclusion,ourstudyhasallowedustoreportahigh

preva-lenceofintestinalcarriageofcarbapenem-resistantbacteriaand

yeastsin cancerpatientsunder chemotherapy.Otherwise,

can-cerpatientsareathighriskfordevelopingendogenousinfections

relatedtothecompromisedhostdefensesandthesequelaeof

treat-ment.Thisdrawsattentiontotheurgentneedtoimproveantibiotic

useandtosupportimplementationofantibioticstewardship pro-gramsandinfectioncontrolmeasuresinhospitalsparticularlyin the departmentof chemotherapy These resultsalso argue the importance need to carry out screening tests for carbapenem-resistantbacteriabeforeeachadmissionofacancerpatient

Nonedeclared

Conceived and designed the experiments: Monzer Hamze, FouadDabboussiandHassanMallat.Performedtheexperiments and wrote the paper: Rima Christophy and Marwan Osman

Trang 5

Mokad-dem

Acknowledgements

WewouldliketothankTahaAbdou,HusamKhaled,Mariam

Yehya,ImaneDarwichandFarahCharrouffortheirexcellent

tech-nical assistance.Thisstudy wasfinanced byDoctoral Schoolof

ScienceandTechnology,LebaneseUniversity,Tripoli,Lebanon

References

[1] Vento S, Cainelli F Infections in patients with cancer undergoing

chemother-apy: aetiology, prevention, and treatment Lancet Oncol 2003;4:595–604.

[2] Zinner S Antimicrobial therapy in cancer patients: studies from the

EORTC International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group Eur J Cancer

1997;33(Suppl 4):44–9.

[3] Mishra R, Oviedo-Orta E, Prachi P, Rappuoli R, Bagnoli F Vaccines and antibiotic

resistance Curr Opin Microbiol 2012;15:596–602.

[4] Samonis G, Anaissie E, Bodey G Effects of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents

on yeast colonization of the gastrointestinal tracts of mice Antimicrob Agent

Chemother 1990;34:2420–2.

[5] Carle S Les antifongiques dans le traitement des infections invasives

Pharma-ctuel 2003;36:25–41.

[6] Schjørring S, Krogfelt KA Assessment of bacterial antibiotic resistance transfer

in the gut Int J Microbiol 2011:312956.

[7] Levey G, Gould I, Endimiani A, Pilar R, Daikos G, Po-Ren H Detection, treatment

and prevention of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae:

recommen-dations from an International Working Group J Chemother 2013;25:129–40.

[8] Katherine M, Knapp MD, Keith B Carbapenems Semin Pediatr Infect Dis

2001;12:175–85.

[9] Nordmann P, Dortet L, Poirel L Carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae:

here is the storm! Trends Mol Med 2012;18:263–72.

[10] Grall N, Andremont A, Armand-Lefèvre L Résistance aux carbapénèmes: vers

une nouvelle impasse? J Anti-Infect 2011;13:87–102.

[11] Gudiol C, Carratala J Antibiotic resistance in cancer patients Expert Rev Anti

Infect Ther 2014;12:1003–16.

labSettings/Klebsiella or Ecoli.pdf

[13] Girlich D, Poirel L, Nordmann P Value of the modified hodge test for

detec-tion of emerging carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae J Clin Microbiol

2012;50:477–9.

[14] Pillai DR, Melano R, Rawte P, Lo S, Tijet N, Fuksa M Klebsiella pneumoniae

carbapenemase, Canada Emerg Infect Dis 2009;15:827–9.

[15] Beyrouthy R, Robin F, Cougnoux A, Dalmasso G, Darfeuille-Michaud A,

Mal-lat H, et al Chromosome-mediated OXA-48 carbapenemase in highly virulent

Escherichia coli J Antimicrob Chemother 2013;68:1558–61.

[16] Bonnin RA, Naas T, Poirel L, Nordmann P Phenotypic, biochemical, and

molec-ular techniques for detection of metallo-␤-lactamase NDM in Acinetobacter

baumannii J Clin Microbiol 2012;50:1419–21.

[17] Nagaraj S, Chandran SP, Shamanna P, Macaden R Carbapenem resistance among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in a tertiary care hospital in south India Indian J Med Microbiol 2012;30:93–5.

[18] Monteiro J, Widen RH, Pignatari AC, Kubasek C, Silbert S Rapid detection of carbapenemase genes by multiplex real-time PCR J Antimicrob Chemother 2012;67:906–9.

[19] Hong SS, Kim K, Huh JY, Jung B, Kang MS, Hong SG Multiplex PCR for rapid detection of genes encoding class A carbapenemases Ann Lab Med 2012;32:359–61.

[20] Lim KT, Yasin R, Yeo CC, Puthucheary S Characterization of multidrug resistant ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolates from hospitals in Malaysia J Biomed Biotechnol 2009:165637.

[21] Torres-Gonzalez P, Cervera-Hernandez ME, Niembro-Ortega MD, Leal-Vega F, Cruz-Hervert LP, Garcia-Garcia L Factors associated to prevalence and inci-dence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae fecal carriage: a cohort study in a Mexican tertiary care hospital PLoS One 2015;10(10):e0139883.

[22] Tischendorf J, de Avila RA, Safdar N Risk of infection following colonization with carbapenem-resistant Enterobactericeae: a systematic review Am J Infect Control 2016;44(5):539–43.

[23] Landman D, Salvani JK, Bratu S, Quale J Evaluation of techniques for detection

of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in stool surveillance cultures Clin Microbiol 2005;43:5639–41.

[24] Lolans K, Calvert K, Won S, Clark J, Hayden MK Direct ertapenem disk screening method for identification of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumo-niae and Escherichia coli in surveillance swab specimens J Clin Microbiol 2010;48:836–41.

[25] Perc¸ in D, Colako˘glu S, Durmaz S, Ekincio˘glu P Comparison of ertapenem-EMB agar with traditional methods for screening carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from rectal swabs Mikrobiyol Bul 2012;46:546–52.

[26] Beyrouthy R, Robin F, Dabboussi F, Mallat H, Hamzé M, Bonnet R Car-bapenemase and virulence factors of Enterobacteriaceae in North Lebanon between 2008 and 2012: evolution via endemic spread of OXA-48 J Antimicrob Chemother 2014;69:2699–705.

[27] Al Bayssari C, Diene S, Loucif L, Gupta S, Dabboussi F, Mallat H Emer-gence of VIM-2 and IMP-15 carbapenemases and inactivation of oprD gene in carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from Lebanon Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014;58:4966–70.

[28] Satlin MJ, Calfee DP, Chen L, Fauntleroy KA, Wilson SJ, Jenkins SG Emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae as causes of bloodstream infections in patients with hematologic malignancies Leuk Lymphoma 2013;54:799–806.

[29] Cuervo SI, Sánchez R, Gómez-Rincón JC, Almenares C, Osorio JP, Vargas MJ Behavior of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae cases in cancer patients at a third level hospital in Bogotá, D.C Biomedica 2014;34(Suppl 1):170–80.

[30] Glasmacher A, Hahn C, Molitor E, Sauerbruch T, Schmidt-Wolf IG, Marklein G Fungal surveillance cultures during antifungal prophylaxis with itraconazole

in neutropenic patients with acute leukaemia Mycoses 1999;42:395–402.

[31] Wingard J Importance of Candida species other than C albicans as pathogens

in oncology patients Clin Infect Dis 1995;20:115–25.

[32] Basma R, Barada G, Ojaimi N, Khalaf RA Susceptibility of Candida albicans to common and novel antifungal drugs, and relationship between the mating type locus and resistance, in Lebanese hospital isolates Mycoses 2009;52:141–8.

[33] Bitar I, Khalaf RA, Harastani H, Tokajian S Identification, typing, antifun-gal resistance profile and biofilm formation of Candida albicans isolates from Lebanese hospital patients Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:931372.

Ngày đăng: 04/12/2022, 16:04

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm