Antibiotic resistance in cancer patientsJ. Carbapenem resistance among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in a tertiary care hospital in south India.. Factors associated to preva
Trang 1Contents lists available atScienceDirect
Journal of Infection and Public Health
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e :h t t p : / / w w w e l s e v i e r c o m / l o c a t e / j i p h
Prevalence, antibiotic susceptibility and characterization of antibiotic
resistant genes among carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli
and yeast in intestinal flora of cancer patients in North Lebanon
Rima Christophya, Marwan Osmana, Hassan Mallata, Marcel Achkarb, Azzam Ziedehc,
Walid Moukaddemc, Fouad Dabboussia, Monzer Hamzea,∗
a r t i c l e i n f o
Keywords:
Cancer
Yeasts
Carbapenemases
Colonization
a b s t r a c t
Theemergenceandspreadofcarbapenem-resistantbacteriaareasignificantclinicalandpublichealth concern.Theaimofthestudyistodeterminetheprevalenceofintestinalcarriageof carbapenem-resistantbacteriaandyeastsincancerpatientsunderchemotherapy.41stoolsamplescollectedfrom cancerpatientsinNinihospitalinTripoli,NorthLebanonhavebeenanalyzed.Afterisolatingyeastsand carbapenem-resistantbacteria,abiochemicalidentificationandantimicrobialsusceptibilityprofilewere determined.Themechanismofenzymaticcarbapenem-resistancewasdetectedbysearchingfor car-bapenemasesbybothHodgetestandPCRassays.Theassociationofseveralmechanismsofresistance wasalsosearched.46.3%(19/41)ofpatientswerecolonizedbyyeast.Candidaglabrata(6/19)wasthe majorspecies.Theprevalenceofcarbapenem-resistantbacteriawas24.4%(10/41)includingEscherichia coli(5/10),Enterobactercloacae(1/10),Enterobacteraerogenes(1/10)Edwardsiellahoshinae(1/10) Pan-toeaagglomerans(1/10)andPseudomonasstutzeri(1/10).PCRandsequencingoftheamplifiedfragments revealedthatPseudomonasstutzeri(1/1)carriedVIMgeneandEnterobacteraerogenes(1/1)andE.coli (1/5)carriedOXA-48gene.TheotherEnterobacteriaceaewereresistanttocarbapenemsbymechanisms otherthanacarbapenemaseincludinghyperproductionofcephalosporinase(4/10),extendedspectrum beta-lactamases(1/10)andbothcephalosporinaseandextendedspectrumbeta-lactamases(2/10).High prevalenceofintestinalcarriageofcarbapenem-resistantbacteriaandyeastsweredetectedincancer patientsunderchemotherapy.Inordertopreventthedevelopmentofendogenousinfectionandthe disseminationofantimicrobialresistance,animplementationofantibioticstewardshipprogramsand infectioncontrolmeasuresisrequiredinhospitalsparticularlyinthedepartmentofchemotherapy
©2017TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierLimited.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCC
BY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Introduction
Cancerpatientsareatincreasedriskofinfectioneitherbecause
theyhaveadeficiencyoftheimmunefunction[1]eitherbecause
ofchemotherapyorradiotherapywhichinduceneutropenia[2]
Theprophylacticantibioticuseisastandardpracticeinpatients
withneutropeniaafterchemotherapy[3].Disruptionoftheflora
ofthegastrointestinaltractisthencreated.Inaddition,treatment
withbroad-spectrumantibioticsincreasestheriskofcandidiasis
byincreasingtheconcentrationofCandidaspp.in the
testinal tract[4] The integrity of the mucousmembranes that can be damaged by the use of cytotoxic chemotherapy agents alsorepresenta riskfactorforthedevelopmentoffungal infec-tions in these patients [5] Potentially pathogenic bacteria are abletocolonize theintestinewhich leadstoa vicious circleof treatmentsandtheemergenceofnewbacteriaresistantto antibi-oticsincludingcarbapenem-resistantspecies[6].Carbapenemsare oftenused totreatinfections caused byenterobacteria produc-ingextended-spectrum-lactamases(ESBL)orcephalosporinase [7].Theydifferfromother-lactamsbytheirpost-antibioticeffect againstGram-negativebacteria[8].Unfortunately,theprevalence
of Enterobacteriaceae producing carbapenemases increasedover thelasttenyearswhich seriouslyleadstoatreatmentimpasse andachallengeinthetreatmentofnosocomialinfections[7].Two http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2016.10.009
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).
Trang 2mechanismsof resistanceare described, theacquisition of
car-bapenemases genesthat encode enzymescapableof degrading
carbapenemsoroverexpressionofß-lactamasesthathaveavery
lowaffinityforthecarbapenemssuchascephalosporinaseandESBL
traitalongwithoutermembraneporinlossorhyper-expressionof
effluxpumps[9,10]
Ontheotherhand,theadequateantibiotictherapyisakeyissue
inmultidrugresistantbacteriamanagement.Severalstudieshave
shownthatcancerpatientsinfectedwithresistantbacteriamore
oftenreceiveinadequateinitialempiricalantibiotictherapy,which
mayimpairoutcomes,increasemortalityandprolong
hospitaliza-tion[11].Therefore,theaimofthisstudywastodeterminethe
prevalenceofcarriageofcarbapenem-resistantbacteriaandyeasts
intheintestinalfloraofcancerpatientsunderchemotherapy
Samplesanddatacollection
41cancerpatientswereincludedinthis study,28were
suf-feringfromsolidtumorsand13withmalignantblooddisorders
ThesepatientsaretreatedatNinihospitalinTripoli,NorthLebanon
Astandardquestionnairewascompletedinordertoobtain
infor-mationincludingtheage,gender,typeofcancer,dateofdisease
diagnosis,surgicaloperationsinrelationtocancerand
microbio-logicalhistory.41stoolsampleswerecollectedbetweenFebruary
andJuly2014andtransportedquicklytothelaboratoryina
ther-mostaticallycontrolledcontainer
Yeastisolationandantifungalsusceptibility
IsolationofyeastswasmadebycultureofstoolonSabouraud
agar (Pronadisa®—Spain) supplemented with chloramphenicol
(0.5g/l)followedbyincubation for24hat37◦C.The
identifica-tionwasconductedbytheuseofAuxacolorTM2(BioRad®—France)
Thedeterminationofthesensitivityofdifferentisolatesto
antifun-galswasmadeusingFungitestTM (BioRad®—France)accordingto
themanufacturer’srecommendedprocedures
Isolationofcarbapenem-resistantbacteria
Isolationafterenrichmentmethod
An amount of stool in the volume of a pea is
intro-duced in a volume of 5ml of enrichment Tryptic Soy Broth
(Scharlau®—Spain) supplemented by an antifungal Nystatin
(2500IU/l)(Medistan®—Lebanon)andadiscofertapenemof10g
(BioRad®—France)andthenincubatedfor24hat37◦C.10lofthis
suspensionisthenspreadonMacConkeyagar(Liofilchem®—Italy)
followedbyincubationfor24hat37◦C[12]
Directisolationmethod
Anamountofstoolinthevolumeofapeaisintroducedina
volumeof5mlofsteriledistilledwater.10lofthissuspension
isinoculatedontoMacConkeyagarsupplementedbyertapenem
(Invanz®—Canada)withaconcentrationof1mg/landwithNystatin
(2500IU/L)andthenincubatedfor24hat37◦C
Biochemicalidentificationandresistancepattern
The identificationof Enterobacteriaceae and oxidase-positive
Gram-negativebacilli wascarriedoutthroughtheuseof RapID
ONE (Remel®—USA) and RapID NF (Remel®—USA), respectively
The susceptibility to antibiotics of strains resistant to at least
one carbapenem was performed by the disk diffusion
accord-ing to “Comité de l’Antibiogramme de la Société Franc¸aise de
Table 1
TTACTGCCCGTTGACGCCC
GAGCACTTCTTTTGTGATGGC
ATGCTGGCCTTGGGGAACG
CGAATGCGCAGCACCAG
CCTCTCAATGGTGTGGGT
ACGAATTCGAGCATCACCAG
AACTAYCCAATAYRTAAC
CTGACAGTTACCAATGCTTA
TGGGTRAARTARGTSACCAGA
TTAGCGTTGCCAGTGCTC
AGTGTGTTTAGAATGGTGATC
TAACTTGACCGACAGAGG
GGGYSGCTTAGATAGTGCTGAT
Microbiologie—EuropeanCommitteeonAntimicrobial Susceptibil-ity(CASFM—EUCAST)recommendations
For thedetectionof a cephalosporinase,Müller–Hintonagar withcloxacillin(0.25g/l)wasused.Discsofertapenem,imipenem, meropenem, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, cefepime and aztreonam were used This test was repeatedonMüller–Hintonagarwithoutcloxacillin After incu-bationfor 24hat 37◦C, thediameter of inhibition zoneswere compared betweenbothMüller–Hinton agar,withandwithout cloxacillin.Forthedetectionofacarbapenemase,theHodgetest wasperformed[13].Thesameprocedurewasrepeatedfor Pseu-domonasstrainsbyusingimipenem(10g)insteadofertapenem DetectionofcarbapenemasesandESBLgenes
BacterialDNAwasextractedbyGenEluteTMBacterialGenomic DNA Kit (Sigma–Aldrich®—USA) The Protocol followed is the oneproposedbythemanufacturer Thegeneamplification was carried out by the thermal cycler (MycyclerTM Thermal cycler, Biorad—France)usingtheprimersdescribedinTable1
Results
46.3% (19/41) of patients were infected withyeast Candida glabrata(C.glabrata)(6/19)wasthemajorspeciesfollowedby Can-didaalbicans(2/19),Candidainconspicua(2/19),Candidatropicalis (1/19),Candidaparapsilosis(1/19)and7strainswerenon identifi-able.Table2expressesthevariousantifungalsusceptibilityprofile Theprevalenceofcolonizationofbacteriaresistantto carbapen-emsincancerpatientsunderchemotherapyinNorthLebanonwas
Trang 3IsolatedstrainswereEscherichiacoli(5/10), Enterobactercloacae
(1/10),Enterobacteraerogenes(1/10),Edwardsiellahoshinae(1/10),
Pantoeaagglomerans(1/10)andPseudomonasstutzeri(1/10).Note
thatonly2strainsofcarbapenem-resistantbacteriaweredetected
bybothmethodsused.Table3expressesthepercentageof
sensi-tivitytoantibioticsfor10carbapenem-resistantstrains
Moreover,outof10strainsresistanttocarbapenems,3were
positiveforHodgetest.2(E.aerogenesandE.coli)ofthemharbored
OXA-48geneandthethirdone(P.stutzeri)harboredVIMgene
InadditiontoOXA-48,E.colialsocontainCTX-Mgene.Theother
carbapenem-resistantstrainshadanoverproduced
cephalospori-naseand/orESBL(Table4)
Discussion
Carbapenem-resistantbacteria areassociated withincreased
morbidity and mortality and are capable of silently colonizing
the digestive tract The present study shows a high
preva-lenceofcarbapenem-resistantbacteriaintestinalcarriage(24.4%)
in cancerpatients under chemotherapy in Nini hospital, North
Lebanon.Recentstudyshowedahighincidenceand prevalence
of carbapenem-resistantEnterobacteriaceae (CRE) intestinal
car-riageinaMexicantertiarycarehospital,particularlyinhematologic
malignancypatients[21].Inaddition,Tischendorfetal.[22]
sug-gestedanoverall16.5%riskofinfectionwithCREamongstpatients
colonizedwithCRE
RegardingthedetectionofGramnegativebacilliresistantto
car-bapenems,resultshaveshownthattheisolationmethodproposed
bytheCentersforDiseaseControl(CDC)failedtodetect4strains
detectedbythemethodofdirectisolationonMacConkeyagar
sup-plementedbyertapenem.Severalauthorsfounddifferencesinthe
detectionofthecolonizationofcarbapenemasesproducingstrains
betweenthemethodsused[23–25].Themajormechanismof
resis-tancedetectedin ourstudywasoverexpressionof ß-lactamase
(cephalosporinaseorESBL)withaproblemofimpermeability
Ourrecentstudy,alsoperformedinNinihospital,including2767
Enterobacteriaceaeisolatesduringtheperiod2008–2012showed
thatamong7enterobacterialresistantspeciestocarbapenem,88%
producedOXA-48carbapenemasewiththepredominanceofE.coli
(73%)[26].Inaddition,thisstudyshowedanincreaseintherateof
CREcolonizationwhichwas0.4%between2008and2010and1.6%
in2012[26].Anotherstudyinthesamehospitalfrom2006to2013
showedthat46%ofP.aeruginosastrainswithdecreasedsensitivity
toimipenemwereharboringblaVIM-2gene[27]
Ontheotherhand,astudyconductedintheUnitedStatesin
2013onthecolonizationofcarbapenemsresistantstrainsof18
patientswithmalignantblooddiseaseshasshownthatthe
major-ityofisolatedstrainswereKlebsiellapneumoniae(14strains)andE
cloacae(3strains).Themechanismofresistancewasrelatedtothe
productionofKPCandCTX-M-15enzymesincombination with
outer-membraneporinloss[28].Furthermore,athirdstudy
per-formedin2014in Colombiaon45cancerpatientsshowedthat
KPCgenewasmorefrequentininfections(82.3%)comparingto
colonization(17.7%)[29]
Withregardtothescreeningforyeast,ourstudyshowedthat
C.glabratawasthemajorspecieswhichisin agreementwitha
studyconductedinGermanyin1999on116patientswithacute
leukemia[30].C glabratawasreportedaspredominantspecies
(51%),followedbyC.albicans(18%)andC.krusei(4%)[30].Areview
of37reportsincluding1591casesofsystemicCandidainfection
amongoncologypatientsshowedtheimportanceofnon-albicans
Candida.46%ofcaseswereduetonon-albicansCandidasuchas
C.tropicalis(25%),C.glabrata(8%),C.parapsilosis(7%),andC.krusei
(4%)[31].Moreover,severalstudieswereconductedinLebanon Table
Trang 4Table 3
E coli E coli E coli E coli E coli E aerogenes E cloacae E hoshinae P agglomerans Pseudomonas stutzeri
S, sensitive; I, intermediate; R, resistant; nd, not determined.
AMP, ampicillin (10 g); AMC, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20/10 g); TIC, ticarcillin (75 g); TCC, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (75/10 g); PIP, piperacillin (30 g); PPT, piperacillin/tazobactam (30/4 g); ATM, aztreonam (30 g); IMP, imipenem (10 g); MEM, meroprnem (10 g); ERT, ertapenem (10 g); CEF, cefalotin (30 g); CXM, cefuroxim (30 g); FOX, cefoxitin (30 g); CFM, cefixim (5 g); CTX, cefotaxime (5 g); FEP, cefepime (30 g); CAZ, ceftazidime (30 g); GMN, gentamicin (10 g); TMN, tobramycin (10 g); AKN, amikacin (30 g); NET, netilmicin (10 g); PI, pipemidic acid (20 g); OFX, ofloxacin (5 g); CIP, ciprofloxacin (5 g); SXT, trimetho-prim/sulfamethoxazole (1,25/23,75 g); CS, colistin (50 g); TGC, tigecyclin (15 g); FSF, fosfomycin (200 g).
Phenotypic and genotypic test for carbapenems resistant Gram negative bacilli.
Strains Hodge test Cephalosporinase inhibition Carbapenemases genes ESBL genes
KPC IMI NMC-A SME GES IMP VIM NDM-1 OXA-48
nd, not determined.
albi-cansstrains,12%wereresistanttoitraconazole,6%toketoconazole,
7.7%tovoriconazole,1.7%toamphotericinB,and5%tofluconazole
AnotherinvestigationconductedbyBitaretal.[33]hasshowna
sig-nificantandrapidlevelofincreasedresistancetoamphotericinB
(37.6%),eventhoughitsuseislimitedinLebanonduetoitstoxicity
Conclusion
Inconclusion,ourstudyhasallowedustoreportahigh
preva-lenceofintestinalcarriageofcarbapenem-resistantbacteriaand
yeastsin cancerpatientsunder chemotherapy.Otherwise,
can-cerpatientsareathighriskfordevelopingendogenousinfections
relatedtothecompromisedhostdefensesandthesequelaeof
treat-ment.Thisdrawsattentiontotheurgentneedtoimproveantibiotic
useandtosupportimplementationofantibioticstewardship pro-gramsandinfectioncontrolmeasuresinhospitalsparticularlyin the departmentof chemotherapy These resultsalso argue the importance need to carry out screening tests for carbapenem-resistantbacteriabeforeeachadmissionofacancerpatient
Nonedeclared
Conceived and designed the experiments: Monzer Hamze, FouadDabboussiandHassanMallat.Performedtheexperiments and wrote the paper: Rima Christophy and Marwan Osman
Trang 5Mokad-dem
Acknowledgements
WewouldliketothankTahaAbdou,HusamKhaled,Mariam
Yehya,ImaneDarwichandFarahCharrouffortheirexcellent
tech-nical assistance.Thisstudy wasfinanced byDoctoral Schoolof
ScienceandTechnology,LebaneseUniversity,Tripoli,Lebanon
References
[1] Vento S, Cainelli F Infections in patients with cancer undergoing
chemother-apy: aetiology, prevention, and treatment Lancet Oncol 2003;4:595–604.
[2] Zinner S Antimicrobial therapy in cancer patients: studies from the
EORTC International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group Eur J Cancer
1997;33(Suppl 4):44–9.
[3] Mishra R, Oviedo-Orta E, Prachi P, Rappuoli R, Bagnoli F Vaccines and antibiotic
resistance Curr Opin Microbiol 2012;15:596–602.
[4] Samonis G, Anaissie E, Bodey G Effects of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents
on yeast colonization of the gastrointestinal tracts of mice Antimicrob Agent
Chemother 1990;34:2420–2.
[5] Carle S Les antifongiques dans le traitement des infections invasives
Pharma-ctuel 2003;36:25–41.
[6] Schjørring S, Krogfelt KA Assessment of bacterial antibiotic resistance transfer
in the gut Int J Microbiol 2011:312956.
[7] Levey G, Gould I, Endimiani A, Pilar R, Daikos G, Po-Ren H Detection, treatment
and prevention of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae:
recommen-dations from an International Working Group J Chemother 2013;25:129–40.
[8] Katherine M, Knapp MD, Keith B Carbapenems Semin Pediatr Infect Dis
2001;12:175–85.
[9] Nordmann P, Dortet L, Poirel L Carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae:
here is the storm! Trends Mol Med 2012;18:263–72.
[10] Grall N, Andremont A, Armand-Lefèvre L Résistance aux carbapénèmes: vers
une nouvelle impasse? J Anti-Infect 2011;13:87–102.
[11] Gudiol C, Carratala J Antibiotic resistance in cancer patients Expert Rev Anti
Infect Ther 2014;12:1003–16.
labSettings/Klebsiella or Ecoli.pdf
[13] Girlich D, Poirel L, Nordmann P Value of the modified hodge test for
detec-tion of emerging carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae J Clin Microbiol
2012;50:477–9.
[14] Pillai DR, Melano R, Rawte P, Lo S, Tijet N, Fuksa M Klebsiella pneumoniae
carbapenemase, Canada Emerg Infect Dis 2009;15:827–9.
[15] Beyrouthy R, Robin F, Cougnoux A, Dalmasso G, Darfeuille-Michaud A,
Mal-lat H, et al Chromosome-mediated OXA-48 carbapenemase in highly virulent
Escherichia coli J Antimicrob Chemother 2013;68:1558–61.
[16] Bonnin RA, Naas T, Poirel L, Nordmann P Phenotypic, biochemical, and
molec-ular techniques for detection of metallo--lactamase NDM in Acinetobacter
baumannii J Clin Microbiol 2012;50:1419–21.
[17] Nagaraj S, Chandran SP, Shamanna P, Macaden R Carbapenem resistance among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in a tertiary care hospital in south India Indian J Med Microbiol 2012;30:93–5.
[18] Monteiro J, Widen RH, Pignatari AC, Kubasek C, Silbert S Rapid detection of carbapenemase genes by multiplex real-time PCR J Antimicrob Chemother 2012;67:906–9.
[19] Hong SS, Kim K, Huh JY, Jung B, Kang MS, Hong SG Multiplex PCR for rapid detection of genes encoding class A carbapenemases Ann Lab Med 2012;32:359–61.
[20] Lim KT, Yasin R, Yeo CC, Puthucheary S Characterization of multidrug resistant ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolates from hospitals in Malaysia J Biomed Biotechnol 2009:165637.
[21] Torres-Gonzalez P, Cervera-Hernandez ME, Niembro-Ortega MD, Leal-Vega F, Cruz-Hervert LP, Garcia-Garcia L Factors associated to prevalence and inci-dence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae fecal carriage: a cohort study in a Mexican tertiary care hospital PLoS One 2015;10(10):e0139883.
[22] Tischendorf J, de Avila RA, Safdar N Risk of infection following colonization with carbapenem-resistant Enterobactericeae: a systematic review Am J Infect Control 2016;44(5):539–43.
[23] Landman D, Salvani JK, Bratu S, Quale J Evaluation of techniques for detection
of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in stool surveillance cultures Clin Microbiol 2005;43:5639–41.
[24] Lolans K, Calvert K, Won S, Clark J, Hayden MK Direct ertapenem disk screening method for identification of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumo-niae and Escherichia coli in surveillance swab specimens J Clin Microbiol 2010;48:836–41.
[25] Perc¸ in D, Colako˘glu S, Durmaz S, Ekincio˘glu P Comparison of ertapenem-EMB agar with traditional methods for screening carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from rectal swabs Mikrobiyol Bul 2012;46:546–52.
[26] Beyrouthy R, Robin F, Dabboussi F, Mallat H, Hamzé M, Bonnet R Car-bapenemase and virulence factors of Enterobacteriaceae in North Lebanon between 2008 and 2012: evolution via endemic spread of OXA-48 J Antimicrob Chemother 2014;69:2699–705.
[27] Al Bayssari C, Diene S, Loucif L, Gupta S, Dabboussi F, Mallat H Emer-gence of VIM-2 and IMP-15 carbapenemases and inactivation of oprD gene in carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from Lebanon Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014;58:4966–70.
[28] Satlin MJ, Calfee DP, Chen L, Fauntleroy KA, Wilson SJ, Jenkins SG Emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae as causes of bloodstream infections in patients with hematologic malignancies Leuk Lymphoma 2013;54:799–806.
[29] Cuervo SI, Sánchez R, Gómez-Rincón JC, Almenares C, Osorio JP, Vargas MJ Behavior of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae cases in cancer patients at a third level hospital in Bogotá, D.C Biomedica 2014;34(Suppl 1):170–80.
[30] Glasmacher A, Hahn C, Molitor E, Sauerbruch T, Schmidt-Wolf IG, Marklein G Fungal surveillance cultures during antifungal prophylaxis with itraconazole
in neutropenic patients with acute leukaemia Mycoses 1999;42:395–402.
[31] Wingard J Importance of Candida species other than C albicans as pathogens
in oncology patients Clin Infect Dis 1995;20:115–25.
[32] Basma R, Barada G, Ojaimi N, Khalaf RA Susceptibility of Candida albicans to common and novel antifungal drugs, and relationship between the mating type locus and resistance, in Lebanese hospital isolates Mycoses 2009;52:141–8.
[33] Bitar I, Khalaf RA, Harastani H, Tokajian S Identification, typing, antifun-gal resistance profile and biofilm formation of Candida albicans isolates from Lebanese hospital patients Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:931372.