Technical Comments: http://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/wrir024259/ca0443text.pdf.Thisissuesneedstobeproperlyaddressedinthemanuscript... Peer Review Report / Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
Trang 1Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 9 (2017) 36–37
Studies
j ou rn a l h o m e pa g e :w w w e l s e v i e r c o m / l o c a t e / e j r h
Peer Review Report
Peer review report 2 on “Sea level rise and coastal groundwater
inundation and shoaling at select sites in California, USA”
1 Original Submission
2 Comments to Author:
3 Editorial comments:
4 Technical Comments:
(http://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/wrir024259/ca0443text.pdf).Thisissuesneedstobeproperlyaddressedinthemanuscript
DOI of the original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.12.055
2214-5818/$ – see front matter
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2016.11.022
Trang 2Peer Review Report / Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 9 (2017) 36–37 37
TheArcadiaandpossiblytheStinsonBeachstudyareasareonlysmallerpartsoflargercoastalaquifers.Idonotbelieve thestudyareasforthesetwositesconformtoanymanagementunitusedforwaterresourceorothermanagementpurposes Thisleadsthereadertotheconclusionthatlargepartsoftheseareasareimpactedbysealevelriseandrisinggroundwater levels.Assuchthemanuscriptgreatlyoverstatesthecaseforimpactsofsealevelrise,especiallysincethediscussioninthe textisintermsofpercentages,ratherthanactualarea.OnlytheMalibuareaisacompleteaquiferorhydrogeologicalunit Thepotentialimpactsdescribedinthemanuscriptneedtobeputincontext
ThedatafromthehydrographfromwellC-1intheMalibuareaismisinterpreted(line444-446).Seecommentintext Themanuscriptissuitableforpublicationintheintendedoutletbutwillneedsomerevisionpriortoacceptancefor publication.Themanuscriptdoespresentinterestinginformationthatreadersshouldfinduseful.Thanksfortheopportunity
toreview
Line50(Abstract):delete“isolated”orperhapschangetocoastal
Lines59-65(Introduction):Move“recentincreaseshavebeenattributedprimarilytoglobalwarmingandassociated meltingofpolaricecaps(Refs)¨totheendoftheparagraphaftertheCayanreference.Youmightwanttochange“global warming”to“globalclimatechange”tobeUSGSpoliticallycorrect
Lines66-68:Isthiscorrectasstated.ThemeaningisthatsealevelhasrisengloballyeverywhereexceptCalifornnia?If notyourintentyoumayneedtoclarify
Lines94-96:Mostofthisislikelytheresultofdecreasedprecipitation,changesinsnowmeltandrunoffect.Forthispaper
isitpossibletoseparatethefractionofthedecreaseattributabletosealevelrise.Likelynot,butIthoughtIwouldask Lines123-125:ThereshouldbesignificantdifferencesbetweenWLrisesdirectlyassociatedwithrisingsealevelandwith waterlevelrisesassociatedwithgroundwaterrisesorinundation(otherthansimplywaterloggingofthecoastalarea).It mightberelevanttodiscusssomeofthosedifferencesdescribedbytheotherstudiesreferenced
Line176:SantaClaragroundwaterbasinnotshownonFig.1
Line179-180:Thephrase“humandevelopment”isveryvague.Doesthatrefertocommercial,residential,agricultural landuse,oralloftheabove?Clarify
Lines204-205:Thegroundwaterlevelsbelowsealevelarepossiblyfordeeperaquifersthatarepumpedforwatersupply CoastaquifersinCaliforniacommonlyhaveperchedwaterlevelaquifersthatarewell-connectedhydrauliclytosurface waterandtotheocean,thesewouldbesusceptibletosealevelriseandGWinundation
Lines222-223:GroundwaterintheMalibuareaisnotpumpedforpublicsupply.Thisshouldbemadeclearinthis paragraphasthewaytheinformationispresentedonwouldthinkthatitis
Line253:Fig.1showsprecipitationnotareasofthestatevulnerableto3mofsealevelriseasstated
Line288-289:delete“whichwouldproduceaplanargroundwatersurface ¨andcombinesentences
Lines341-344:Haveyouestimatedinfiltrationfromprecipitationinthisareaandcompareditwithon-sitewastewater treatmentsystemdischarges?Youshouldcheckthatcalculationandverifythewaterbudget
Line427-430:Thisconclusionseemsincorrect.Ifthedatadonotreflecttheworstcasescenario,howcantheyproduce
aconservativeestimate.ItwouldseemtheyunderestimatethepotentialseawaterriseGWinundation?
Line432-434:Thisisamisinterpretationofthedata.ThetidalsignalinC-1isdampedbyWLinthelagoonunderclosed bermconditionspresentatthetime.C-1ismeasuringamuchdifferenthydrologicsettingthantheother2wells
Line443:Thewetareatothewestinanaturalfeature.Thereisanartificialwetlandconstructedintheareaforstormwater capture,butthisisnotit
Line486:replace“chronicallylow”with“lowered”
Lines488-491:Nicestatement.Thisshouldbeincludedintheabstract
Line494:delete“abundant”
Line501-505:Notatruestatementastheaquiferspumpedforwatersupply(suchastheOxnardaquifer)inthearea areoverlainbyshallowerunconfinedaquifers.IntheOxnardareathisaquiferiscommonlyreferredtoasthe“perched aquifer”,althoughnottrulyperchedinmostareasitisunconfinedandhighlysaline.Similaraquifersarepresentallalong theCalifornaicoast
Line508:actuallyrechargefromthesepticsystemsdoescreatetheaquifers,buttheydocauseincreasedwaterlevelsin thoseshallowaquifers.Pleaseclaify
Line513:considerreplacing“potentiallycontaminated”withsomethingontheorderof“highnitrateorbacterial con-centrationsassociatedwithsepticdischarges”
Lines506and521:Considerreplacingthephrases“Coastalbeachcommunities”and“Coastallagooncommunities”with
“Coastalbeachdevelopment”and“Coastallagoondevelopment”
Line576-577:replace“populationpressure”with“increasingpopulation”
Fig.2AThewellsaredifficulttodistinguishfromthecontrolpointsinthefigure,suggestusingdifferentcolors
Anonymous