Figure6ismisleadingbecauseonemaythinkthattherenotrendsinAfrica,EuropeandAsia,whiletheabsenceoftrends reflectstheabsenceofdata,asdrawninFigure1c.TheauthorsshouldconsiderremovingFigure6orat
Trang 1Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 9 (2017) 29–30
Studies
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e :w w w e l s e v i e r c o m / l o c a t e / e j r h
scales”
1 Original Submission
2 Comments to Author:
Review
Comments
DOI of the original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.12.061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2016.11.033
Trang 2Figure6ismisleadingbecauseonemaythinkthattherenotrendsinAfrica,EuropeandAsia,whiletheabsenceoftrends
reflectstheabsenceofdata,asdrawninFigure1c.TheauthorsshouldconsiderremovingFigure6oratleastaddanoteto
warnreaders
Figure7isdifficulttoreadandshouldbereworked
Uptoline402,thepaperwasveryfactualandnohydrometeorologicalinterpretationofthetrendswereprovided.Iwas
thussurprisedtoreadsomeinterpretations,fordischargeonly,intheconclusionfromlines402to407.Theauthorshave
twooptions:removelines402–407orprovidephysicalinterpretationforallvariables(andmuchearlierinthedocument
thanintheconclusion)
Lines41–418areabitpuzzlinglocatedinthelastparagraphoftheconclusion.Thisissueshouldhavebeenraisedinthe
methodology(Section2.4),ifatall
Anonymous