1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Fixed Power Allocation for Outage Performance Analysis on AF-assisted Cooperative NOMA Xem nội dung đầy đủ tại: https://123docz.net/document/11923410-issn-2315-4462.htm

6 5 0
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 6
Dung lượng 1,35 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

ISSN 2315 4462 Fixed Power Allocation for Outage Performance Analysis on AF assisted Cooperative NOMA Dinh Thuan Do and Tu Trinh T Nguyen Faculty of Electronics Technology, Industrial University of Ho[.]

Trang 1

Fixed Power Allocation for Outage Performance Analysis

on AF-assisted Cooperative NOMA

Dinh-Thuan Do and Tu-Trinh T Nguyen Faculty of Electronics Technology, Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Email: dodinhthuan@iuh.edu.vn, tutrinhamber@gmail.com

Abstract—In this paper, new radio access scheme that

combining relaying protocol and Non-orthogonal Multiple

access (NOMA) system is introduced In particular, different

scenarios for fixed power allocation scheme are investigated In

addition, the outage probability of both weak and strong user is

derived and provided in closed-form expressions Such outage

is studied in high SNR scenario and comparison performance

between these NOMA scenarios is presented Numerical

simulations are offered to clarify the outage performance of the

considered scheme if varying several parameters in the existing

schemes, and to verify the derived formula

Index Terms—Cooperative non-orthogonal multiple access,

outage probability, AF

I INTRODUCTION

As one favorable technology in future fifth-generation

(5G) wireless networks, non-orthogonal multiple access

(NOMA) has been proposed to increase spectral

efficiency [1] By permitting multiple users served in the

same time, frequency or code domain, spectral efficiency

and user fairness are improved in NOMA compared with

Orthogonal Multiple Access (OMA) In NOMA, the

transmitter superposes multiple users’ messages and the

receivers deploys successive interference cancellation

(SIC) to distinct the mixture signals in the power domain

[2] In [3], the system performance regarding outage

probability (OP) and ergodic capacity were studied in

typical dual-hop NOMA transmission

The fixed relaying and adaptive relaying schemes have

been suggested to implement cooperative communication

The full-duplex and relaying network are investigated in

[4], [5] Recently, in relaying networks, two well- known

cooperative relaying protocols are studied, namely

Amplify Forward (AF) and decode forward (DF) [6, 7]

By AF protocols, received signal from the source is

amplified to forward to the destination, while the received

signal in DF protocols need be first decoded, then

re-encoded to forward to the destination The author in [8]

presented hardware impairment as important impact on

system performance of such relaying scheme

The relaying scheme as consideration can be deployed

together with NOMA Formerly, superposition coding is

proposed in wireless network and currently it is named as

NOMA Such scheme improves the throughput of a

broadcast/multicast system and efficient broadcasting is

Manuscript received November 12, 2018; revised June 3, 2019

doi:10.12720/jcm.14.7.560-565

achieved Additionally, the influence of user coupling on the performance in NOMA is investigated [9], in which both the fixed power distribution assisted NOMA (F-NOMA) and cognitive radio assisted NOMA (CR-NOMA) systems were considered in term of the outage performance Furthermore, the outage balancing among users was investigated by deploying user grouping and decoding order selection [10] In particular, the optimal decoding order and power distribution in closed-form formula for downlink NOMA were performed In [11], only feed back one bit of its channel state information (CSI) to a base station (BS) is considered in term of outage behavior of each NOMA user in downlink NOMA

As advantage of such model as providing higher fairness for multiple users, it lead to NOMA with better performance as comparison with conventional opportunistic one-bit feedback In order to increase the specific data rate, the wireless powered communication networks (WPCN) scheme is deployed with NOMA uplink system in [12] By using the harvested energy in the first time slot, the strong users in NOMA can be forward signal to the weak users’ messages in the second time slot in case of using half-duplex (HD) scheme [13] The maximising the data rate in the strong user with guaranteeing the QoS of the weak user is considered as in [14] to solve tackle of SWIPT NOMA system related to half-duplex case

Motivated by above analysis in [9], this paper presents

a fixed power allocation scheme to show outage performance of separated users in the NOMA scheme in case of deployment of AF scheme

II SYSTEM MODEL

We consider a downlink cooperative NOMA scenario

consisting of one base station denoted as BS, one relay R and two users (i.e., the nearby user D2 and distant user D1) The Amplify-and –Forward (AF) protocol is

employed at each relay and only one relay is selected to assist BS conveying the information to the NOMA users

in each time slot All wireless channels in the scenario considered are assumed to be independent non-selective block Rayleigh fading and are disturbed by additive white Gaussian noise with mean power 2 The wireless channel h CN(0,1),g1 CN(0,1),g2 CN(0,1), denote the complex channel coefficient of BS-R, R-D1, R-D2, respectively In principle of NOMA, two users are

©2019 Journal of Communications 560

Trang 2

classified into the nearby user and distant user by their

quality of service (QoS) not sorted by their channel

conditions In this case, we assume transmit power at

relay and the BS is the same

R BS D1

D2

Cell-center

Cell-edge

Fig 1 System model of AF-NOMA

Based on the aforementioned assumptions, the

observation at the relay R is given by

yh a Pxa Pxw (1)

where x x1, 2 are the normalized signal for D1, D2,

respectively It is assumed that    2 2

E xE x  ,

1, 2

a a are power allocation factors To stipulate better

fairness between the users, we assume that a1a2

satisfying a1a21

Using AF scheme, the amplify gain is defined by

1

P h

 (2)

In the second phase, the received signal at user D1 is

y  Pg h a Pxa Pxw w (3)

where w w r, d are additive white Gaussian noise terms

with mean power 2 Similarly, the received signal at

user D2 is given by

y  Pg a Pxa Px h Pg ww (4)

To evaluate system performance, we first consider the

received signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR) at

D1 to detect x1 is given by

2

In which, we denote P2 as signal to noise ratio

(SNR) at the BS

By considering in SIC is also invoked by D2 and the

received SINR at D2 to detect x1 is given by

2

x

Then the received SINR at D2 to detect its own

information is given by

2

x

  (7)

In case of imperfect SIC, we have

2

ipsic x

   (8)

Remark 1: With regard to optimize of power

allocation can be studied to obtain better performance as further work considered in our next papers However, such computation of power allocation needs more complexity in signal processing as overhead information

of power allocation must be known to control power associated with each users

III OUTAGE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

In this section, we performs analysis on the performance of AF-NOMA scheme in terms of outage probability for several signal processing cases To make its convenient in analysis, this paper presents exact expressions for the outage probability In order to reduce the computation complexity, a tight lower bound for the outage probability is provided in the high-SNR regime to better understand the behavior of the network

In general, an outage event occurs at the strong or the weak user when the user fails to decode its own signal In this section, we denote the threshold SNR as i,i1, 2 Based on the rate requirements of the users, we can choose different target rate values for R1 and R2, and we will demonstrate how the R1 and R2 affect the outage performance in the numerical result section For sake of brevity, we denote 2 1 2 2

A Outage Probability of D1

We first consider the outage probability for detecting

1

x at D1 can be expressed as

1 D x1, 1 Pr 1 1

OP OP    (9)

Here, we denote Pr   as probability function We first calculate each component of outage event as below

2

Pr

1

D x

a h g OP

(10)

2

h   aa , we have OP D x1, 11, else

 112 1 

2 1

1

1 2

Pr

1

D x

a a

h

z

z dz

 

 

(11)

©2019 Journal of Communications 561

Trang 3

Putting new variable as

Based on (11) we can find that:

1

1 2 1

1

1, 1

1 2 1

0

1

1 1

exp

D x

a a

z

z a a

a a

dt

 

 

 

(12)

It can be further manipulated as below

1

1, 1

2

0

2 1

exp

D x

OP

dt

(13)

Final step, it can be expressed the outage event as

below

2

1 exp

D x

OP

a a

 

B .Outage Probability of D2

1) Perfect SIC

Secondly, the outage probability for detecting x2 at D2

can be expressed as

2, 1 1 2, 2 2

Pr

    (15)

Substituting (6) and (7) into (15), we have

2, 2 1 Pr 1, 2

D x

OP   J J (16)

where

2 2

2

2

,

J

and

2 2

2 2

2 2 1

J

Exact analysis is

2

2 2 2

1

2

2 1

1

2 2

2

2

2 2

1 2

1

1,

1 Pr

1

1 Pr

1

D x

a h g OP

a h g

a

a

g

 

2

2 2

1

h



2

2 2 2

1

2

2 1

1

2 2

2

2

2 2

1 2

1

1,

1 Pr

1

1 Pr

1

D x

a h g OP

a h g

a

a

g

 

2

1

h



2 1

1

2 2

2

2

2 2

1

1,

1 Pr

1

1 Pr

1

a

a

g

2

2 2

1

1 Pr

1

h g

h

 



2

min a a,a

In the case of  h2 1 0, it leads to following inequality h2 1 , the outage probability in this case can be calculated as OP D2, 2x 1

In the case of  h2 1 0, the outage probability is given by

2, 2

1

0

0

1

1

4

D x

z

z

t

dt t

t dt t



 

(18) Similarly steps to achieve (11), it can be found outage probability in such as

D x OP

 

(19)

2) Imperfect SIC

2, 1 1 2, 2 2

Pr

ipsic

In this paper, we approximate the

2 2

2

2

1

x

a a

SNR regime when 2  1

1

2

2

2

2

2

1 Pr

1

ipsic

D x

a OP

a

©2019 Journal of Communications 562

Trang 4

2

2

2

2

2

1 Pr

Pr

1

ipsic

D x

a OP

a

(21)

Firstly, we consider the first item, if a a1 21we

obtain OP D ipsic2, 2x 1 , else a a1 21 we have

2 2

2

2

2 2 2

2 2

0

1 Pr

1 1

1 Pr

1

ipsic

D x

a

a h g OP

g

a h

t z

a z

(22)

In the first case of a2 h220 , it leads to

following equation h2  2 a2 , outage probability in

this case calculated as ipsic2, 2 1

D x

In the second case, as a2h220

2 2

1

2 2

2, 2

0

2

1

2

ipsic

D x

a

x z

a z

       

(23)

where

  1 0

2

2

b

a b

a

y

a

(24)

Proof: see in Appendix

C Asymtotic Analysis

And the lower bounds of the outage probability in

(14)and (19) are shown to be tight bounds in the

medium-and high-SNR regimes

At high SNR, the outage probability at D1 will become

1, 1

2 exp

D x

OP

  (25)

At high SNR, the outage probability at D2 will become

2

2, 2

2

2 exp

D x

OP

a

To further evaluation of system, we consider the

throughput in delay-limited mode In particular, the

throughput mainly depends on the outage probability

The throughput at D1 will become

1

1

2

asym

OP R

R

(27)

The throughput at D2 will become

 

2

2

1 2

asym

OP R

R a

(28)

2 2

a a

IV NUMERICAL RESULTS

In this section, the outage performance of the downlink AF-NOMA network under Rayleigh fading channel is evaluated via numerical examples to validate derived formula Moreover, the fixed power allocation is applied

in order to further evaluation of such NOMA Without loss of generality, we assume the distance in each link of two-hop relaying NOMA is normalized to unity In the following simulations, we set the fixed power allocation factors for NOMA users as a10.9,a20.1

Fig 2 Outage probability vs the transmit SNR Fig 2 plots the outage probability of considered scheme versus SNR for a simulation setting R11 bits/s/Hz, R2 1 bits/s/Hz It can be seen that the exact analytical results and simulation results are matched very well In particular, it shown that as the system SNR increases, the outage probability decreases Another important observation is that the outage probability for User D1 of NOMA outperforms for User D2 Note that the results related to such outage performance resulted from power allocation for each user in NOMA

In Fig 3, the outage probability versus system SNR is presented in different threshold SNR parameters In this case, our parameters are R R1, 2   1, 2 bits/s/Hz,

R R1, 2  0.5,1.5bits/s/Hz for target rates Obviously

©2019 Journal of Communications 563

Trang 5

in this case, the outage probability curves match exactly

with the Monte Carlo simulation results One can observe

that adjusting the target rates of NOMA users will affect

the outage behaviors of considered scheme As the value

of target rates increases, the outage performance will

becomes worse It is worth noting that the setting of

reasonable threshold SNR or target rate for NOMA users

is prerequisite based on the specific application

requirements of different scenarios

Fig 3 Outage probability vs the transmit SNR with different threshold

SNR

Fig 4 plots system outage probability versus SNR in

high SNR mode It can be observed that the analytical

results meet with that in high SNR case In Fig 4, the

outage performance comparison in high SNR regime, in

which we setup R11 bits/s/Hz,R2 1bits/s/Hz This

illustration indicates that our derived expressions are tight

result for evaluation in related NOMA networks

Fig 4 Outage performance comparison in high SNR regime

Fig 5 plots system throughput versus SNR in

delay-limited transmission mode Here, we set R10.5

bits/s/Hz, R2 2 bits/s/Hz Furthermore, the AF-based

NOMA scheme for D1 outperform D2 in terms of system

throughput This phenomenon indicates that it is of

significance to consider the impact of power allocation

for such scheme when designing practical cooperative

NOMA systems

Fig 5 Throughput performance vs the transmit SNR

V CONCLUSIONS This paper presented a novel downlink cooperative communication system that combines NOMA with AF relaying techniques in analytical model for outage analysis The proposed scheme in term of outage performance is considered under impacts of various parameters in cooperative NOMA systems Furthermore, impact of the transmit SNR of the source node in cooperative relaying NOMA on the throughput is performed via simulation and acceptable threshold can be shown to the system evaluation The superior performance of the proposed schemes was demonstrated

by the numerical results As a future work, it will be interesting to investigate the user fairness problem only with relative locations of the users as in group More importantly, the outage probability of both strong and weak users in the system is derived and verified by comparing numerical simulations and analytical simulation

APPENDIX (PROOF OF PROPOSITION 1)

In (23), we can express in following formula

2 2

2 2 1

2

2

2

2

2 2

1 exp

1

4 2

a

t

x

x a a

The intergal expression in (23) becomes

2

0

2

2 2

2

a a

©2019 Journal of Communications 564

Trang 6

Now consider a following integration form

 

1 0

1 0

b

(A.2)

The integral formula in can be obtained by using [15,

vol 4, eq (1.1.2.3)] and re-expressed as The first term in

(23) can be fulfilled by applying [15, vol 4, eq (3.16.2.4)]

 

1

0

2

2

a

a

(A.3)

The second term in (A.2) is difficult for producing

closed-form because of the Bessel function and

exponential function This is end of proof

REFERENCES

[1] Y Saito, et al., “Non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA)

for cellular future radio access,” in Proc IEEE Veh Tech

Conf, Dresden, Germany, Jun 2013, pp 1-5

[2] S M R Islam, N Avazov, O A Dobre, et al,

“Power-domain non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) in 5G

systems: potentials and challenges,” IEEE

Communications Surveys Tutorials, no 99, p 1, Oct 2016

[3] D T Do and C B Le, “Application of NOMA in wireless

system with wireless power transfer scheme: Outage and

ergodic capacity performance analysis,” Sensors, vol 18,

no 10, 2018

[4] K T Nguyen, D T Do, X X Nguyen, N T Nguyen, and

D H Ha, “Wireless information and power transfer for full

duplex relaying networks: Performance analysis,” in Proc

Recent Advances in Electrical Engineering and Related

Sciences, HCMC, Vietnam, 2015, pp 53-62

[5] X X Nguyen and D T Do, “Maximum harvested energy

policy in full-duplex relaying networks with SWIPT,”

International Journal of Communication Systems (Wiley),

vol 30, no 17, 2017

[6] D T Do, H S Nguyen, M Voznak, and T S Nguyen,

“Wireless powered relaying networks under imperfect

channel state information: System performance and

optimal policy for instantaneous rate,” Radioengineering,

vol 26, no 3, pp 869-877, 2017

[7] X X Nguyen, D T Do, “Optimal power allocation and

throughput performance of full-duplex DF relaying

networks with wireless power transfer-aware channel,”

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and

Networking, p 152, 2017

[8] D T Do, “Power switching protocol for two-way relaying

network under hardware impairments,” Radioengineering,

vol 24, no 3, 765-771, 2015

[9] Z Ding, P Fan, and H V Poor, “Impact of user pairing on

5G non-orthogonal multiple-access downlink

transmissions,” IEEE Trans Veh Technol., vol 65, no 8,

pp 6010–6023, Aug 2016

[10] S Shi, L Yang, and H Zhu, “Outage balancing in downlink nonorthogonal multiple access with statistical

channel state information,” IEEE Trans Wireless Commun., vol 15, no 7, pp 4718–4731, Jul 2016

[11] P Xu, Y Yuan, Z Ding, X Dai, and R Schober, “On the outage performance of non-orthogonal multiple access

with 1-bit feedback,” IEEE Trans Wireless Commun., vol

15, no 10, pp 6716–6730, Oct 2016

[12] P D Diamantoulakis, K N Pappi, Z Ding, and G K Karagiannidis, “Wireless-powered communications with

non-orthogonal multiple access,” IEEE Trans Wireless Commun., vol 15, no 12, pp 8422–8436, 2016

[13] M Ashraf, A Shahid, J W Jang, and K G Lee, “Energy harvesting non-orthogonal multiple access system with

multi-antenna relay and base station,” IEEE Access, vol 5,

2017

[14] Y Xu, C Shen, Z Ding, X Sun, S Yan, G Zhu, and Z Zhong, “Joint beamforming and power-splitting control in

downlink cooperative SWIPT NOMA systems,” IEEE Trans Signal Process., vol 65, no 18, pp 4874–4886,

2017

[15] A P Prudnikov, Y A Brychkov, and O I Marichev,

Integrals and Series, New York, NY, USA: Gordon and

Breach, 1992

Dinh-Thuan DO received the B.S

degree, M.Eng degree, and Ph.D degree from Viet Nam National University (VNU-HCMC) in 2003, 2007, and 2013 respetively, all in Communications Engineering He was a visiting Ph.D student with Communications Engineering Institute, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan from 2009 to 2010 Prior to joining Ton Duc Thang University, he was senior engineer at the VinaPhone Mobile Network from 2003 to 2009 Dr Thuan was recipient of Golden Globe Award from Vietnam Ministry of Science and Technology in 2015 His research interest includes signal processing in wireless communications network, cooperative communications, full-duplex transmission and energy harvesting His publications include 25 + SCI/SCIE journals

and 50+ conference papers He also serves as Associate Editor

of Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics journal (SCOPUS)

Tu-Trinh T Nguyen received the

B.Sc degree in Electrical-Electronics Engineering from Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam (2018) She is working at WICOM lab Her research interest includes signal processing in wireless communications network, NOMA, relaying networks

©2019 Journal of Communications 565

Ngày đăng: 22/11/2022, 14:09

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm