The water-the salt-soluble 012 Published mical, Biolog words: PEANUT, ntroduction Aspergillus fla ortunistically, ogaea L., su ction of peanu inogenic aflat Corresponding a E-mail add
Trang 1APCBEE Procedia 4 ( 2012 ) 42 – 47
2212-6708© 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of Asia-Pacifi c Chemical, Biological & Environmental Engineering Society
doi: 10.1016/j.apcbee.2012.11.008
W
Abst
This
Aspe
seque
from
grow
Yet,
© 20
Chem
Keyw
1 In
A
oppo
hypo
infec
carc
*
E
An A
Assoc
Waraluk Sen
a Dep
b Departm
tract
work aims to
ergillus flavus r
ential extractio
m the present m
wth The
water-the salt-soluble
012 Published
mical, Biolog
words: PEANUT,
ntroduction
Aspergillus fla
ortunistically,
ogaea L.), su
ction of peanu
inogenic aflat
Corresponding a
E-mail address: su
IC Alternate ciation w
nakoona, Su
partment of Bioch ment of Plant Scie
establish chara resistance assay
on with 2 M Na method showed -soluble albumi
e globulin fracti
d by Elsevier B ical & Enviro
SEED PROTEIN
avus is the s
it can be a ubterranean p
ut seeds by A
toxins Attemp
author Tel.: +6-64 uporn@kku.ac.th.
CAAA 2012
e Fractio with Inhib
uporn Nuc
and
hemistry, Faculty ence and Agricult
acteristic SDS-P
y Comparing to aCl in buffer (p unique profiles
in fraction had ion enhanced bo
B.V Selection onmental Engi
NS, ASPERGILL
oilborne fung pathogen to peanut pods a
A flavus is a
pts have been
43-342-911; fax:
2: July 23-2 nation o bitory A
chadomron
d Patcharin
y of Science, Khon tural Resources, F
PAGE profiles
o the traditional
pH 6.8), 70% e
s possessing an specific profil oth processes o
n and/or peer r ineering Socie
US FLAVUS, SPO
gi fundamenta plants and a are highly su serious probl
n studied to co
+6-643-342-911
24, 2012, Si
of Peanut Assay on
ga,*, Gulsir
n Songsrib
n Kaen University Faculty of Agricu
s of peanut see
l method, a suc ethanol and wa ntifungal activi
es and demons
of A flavus prop
review under ety
ORE GERMINA
ally acting a animals Like usceptible to
em due to th
ombat A flavu
ngapore
t Seed P
Aspergi
ri Senawon
y, Khon Kaen 400 ulture, Khon Kaen
d albumins and ccessful alternat ater The alcoh ity against spor strated inhibitio pagation
responsibility
ATION
s a saprophy
in drought-s
A flavus inv
e consequent
us colonizatio
Proteins i
illus flav
nga, Sanun
002, Thailand.
n 40002, Thailan
d prolamins as
te method was ol-soluble prol
re germination
on only on myc
y of Asia-Pacif
yte, but in so stressed peanu vasion [1] Pr seed contami
on through sev
in
vus
n Jogloyb
nd.
sociated with developed by amin fraction and mycelial celial growth
fic
ome case or
uts (Arachis
re-harvested ination with veral means
© 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of Asia-Pacifi c Chemical,
Biological & Environmental Engineering Society
Trang 2For an interesting point, peanut seeds contain storage proteins initially as reservoirs for seed germination while some of them are allergens having antifungal activity The first group is the proteins with trypsin inhibitor activity They are Ara h 2 which stands in both the globulin and the 2S albumin families regarding close amino acid sequence homology (≥35-39%), and the relatively homologous Ara h 7 [2,3,4,5,6] The globulin Ara h 3 is another one in this group [7] The second is nonspecific lipid transfer proteins Ara h 9 [4] The Ara h 2, Ara h 7 and Ara h 9 are in the same prolamin superfamily based on the eight cysteine conserved pattern [5,8], though very low sequence homology It has been known in the literatures that seed albumins are extractable in water or diluted salt while globulins are salt soluble extracted by high salt concentration i.e at least 1 M NaCl Prolamins are soluble in aqueous alcohol The globulin family has been so far identified for peanut drought tolerant genotypes [9], which are known as the approach to reduce aflatoxin contamination Focusing at the Ara h members, the albumin and prolamin families have potential to associate with antifungal action It is of our initial intention to extract peanut seed proteins with alternated order of solvent hopefully to
obtain fractions of albumins and prolamins having distinguished profiles Both fractions were tested against A
flavus comparing to the globulin fraction The data will be applied for screening peanut germplasms with an
advantage genotype of antifungal seed storage proteins for the breeding program
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Biological materials
Peanut seeds were purchased from a local market The aflatoxin-producing A flavus isolate was originally
from the laboratory at Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhonratchasima province, Thailand
2.2 Sample preparation
Peanut kernels were crushed in liquid N2 and defatted with hexane (15 ml/g) at -20°C overnight The
defatted meals were pooled by centrifugation (10000g, 10 min, 4°C), air-dried and stored at -20oC until used
2.3 Protein fractionation
Briefly for the whole, extractions were done by 1-h stirring at room temperature using 5-ml solvent per 1 g
defatted meal The supernatant of each extract collected by centrifugation (10000g, 30 min, 4oC) was kept as a protein fraction relating to its solubility i.e water-soluble, salt-soluble and alcohol-soluble Two methods were carried out In the first method, traditional extraction was conducted orderly by water, 2 M NaCl and 70% ethanol At each step after collecting the supernatant, the pellet was rinsed twice with a small volume of the subsequent solvent The fraction was made clear of NaCl or ethanol by washing with 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 6.8) using centrifugal filtration through a 10-kDa cutoff filter membrane In the second method, the alternated extraction was sequentially by 2 M NaCl in the buffer (pH 6.8), 70% ethanol and water The pellet from either step was rinsed twice with acetone and air-dried before used in the next step The salt-soluble fraction was desalted by centrifugal filtration as above The alcohol-soluble fraction was added with 4 volumes of acetone, then the protein precipitate was air-dried and suspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8)
2.4 SDS-PAGE for seed protein profiling
All procedures and electrophoretic reagents were as described by Laemmli [10] Profiling of proteins (10 g) was made in a 13% gel with a Mini-Protean III unit (Bio-Rad) Protein bands were stained by Coomassie
Trang 3brilliant blue R-250 Low MW markers (GE Healthcare) were introduced for size estimation
2.5 Inhibitory assay on A flavus
The assay was run only with protein fractions from the alternate method Freshly A flavus sporulated
culture on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium was flooded with sterile water The culture surface was disturbed gently with a sterile loop to release spores In triplicates, 80-μl spore suspensions (8 x 105spores/ml) were taken to the 96-well plate Control wells were further added with 20-μl sterile water, while including in the tested wells with a protein extract (20 μl; 0.2 mg protein/well) Following 10 h at 30°C, O.D 550 nm was recorded by a Microplate Reader Microscopic observation for spore germination was made after 5% glutaraldehyde fixation and the percentage of germinating spores was obtained by counting totally 300 spores
Antifungal test on the mycelial growth was studied by growing A flavus on a 90-mm PDA plate until the
mycelial colony spread over 3 cm Germ-free paper discs (0.9 cm in diameter) were placed at the distance of 0.5 cm to the edge of the colony After filling the disc with aliquots of water as control and the protein solution, the plate was incubated for 24 h and inspected for growth inhibition
3 Results and discussion
From the traditional water-to-salt-to-alcohol extraction in Fig 1a, the salt-soluble fraction had polypeptide compositions from <16 kDa to >97 kDa This promising globulin fraction showed almost the same profiles as those of peanut seed total protein or mixture of globulins/albumins reported elsewhere [11,14], yet the typical major globulins were three at 20-27 kDa and four at 35-43 kDa for arachins, and at 65 kDa for con-arachins These are two globulins predominantly at least 73% [11,12] in peanut seed proteins Other bands were also apparent here which could be referred as globulins [13] at 15.5-19.5 kDa together with the minor band at around 95 kDa The bands between 27-35 kDa and below 16 kDa were unknown for peanut seed globulins Band patterns of the water-soluble (albumins) and alcohol-soluble (prolamins) fractions were similar having several bands commonly with the globulin fraction The albumin profiles were different from those previously reported [14] due to the details of extraction Regarding restrictedly to the band patterns, the traditionally sequential extraction did not give characteristic profiles of albumin and prolamin fractions SDS-gel profiles
of peanut seed prolamins have not been evident in literatures What can be searched is the molecular mass of 9-10 kDa for a prolamin Ara h 9 [4,5] The gel system in the work can not resolve such very small molecules The reproducible results from the alternate method salt-to-alcohol-to-water extraction were shown in Fig 1b The salt-soluble protein profiles resembled those in the former method The following alcohol extraction led to characteristic appearance of small polypeptide profiles disappearing large amount of the major bands of the globulin fraction Results from final water extraction could be compared with that of the salt extraction, but four new intense specific bands were recovered remarkably Therefore, this alternate method was proposed to successfully discriminate fractions of the most abundant peanut seed globulins, the minor albumins and the trace prolamins It should be reminded that the three protein families are known by their preferable solubility in solution of different ionic strength and polarity Proteins possess intermediate property can be extracted by more than one solvent There was a report for the seed of Conophor nut [15] that salt extract dissolved almost an equal amount of true albumins (41.86%) and true globulins (58.14%)
Effect on A flavus spore germination showed after 10-h incubation, simply from turbidity at O.D 550 nm
(Table 1) The fungus grew the least in the control well not containing any protein fraction The alcohol-soluble proteins (prolamins) exhibited a result very little different from that of the control, interpreting its inhibitory effect When the spores were treated with the expecting globulin or albumin fraction, fungal growth was highly detectable This evidence was consistent with the spore counting (Table 1 and Fig 2) that
Trang 4percentage of spore germination in the control was lowest (74.44%) Germ tube emergence in treatment with the prolamin fraction slightly increased Meanwhile, the other two protein fractions enhanced germination to 100% and promoted mycelial extension, perhaps as an enriched nitrogen source Globulin fraction wetting with paper discs supported the mycelial spread over the discs, in an amount dependent manner (0.1-0.3 mg), which was seen by the green spore-fruiting body, comparing to the negative control disc The albumin fraction (0.3 mg) and prolamin fraction (0.2 mg) were active against the fungal invasion The inhibition was not so strong that it did not give growth clear zone
It cannot be negligible that the globulin, albumin and prolamin family can be cross-contaminated while being extracted with the specific solubilizing solution for each The experiments started peanut seed protein extraction with 2 M NaCl in buffer hopefully to separate out true globulins and intermediate globulins/albumins Then the solvent was switched to rather hydrophobicity of 70% ethanol for prolamin extraction, then back to the polarity of water for true albumins The last water extract might retain some intermediate globulins However, the present data recommend that profiles of the albumin and especially
prolamin fractions obtained by the alternate method contain A flavus resistance associated proteins having potential in identification of the A flavus resistant peanuts The globulin family is proposed weak markers due
to its excess protein compositions with strong supplementing effect on the fungal growth Besides, it contains
a large amount of potent allergens [16]
Fig 1 SDS-PAGE profiles of peanut seed proteins fractionated by (a) traditional method and (b) alternate method Lane M: low MW markers, 1: salt-soluble fraction, 2: water-soluble fraction, and 3: alcohol-soluble fraction
e f g
Fig 2 Inhibitory assay on Aspergillus flavus Spore germination assay; (a) control (b-d) treatment with prolamin fraction, albumin
fraction, and globulin fraction, respectively Mycelial growth inhibition test by; (e) prolamin fraction, (f) albumin fraction, and (g) globulin fraction Sterile water was used as the negative control The protein amount in milligrams was numerically labeled
Trang 5Table 1 The effect of the protein fraction on Aspergillus flavus spore germination (n = 3)
Treatment Expecting protein family O.D 550 nm % Spore germination
Control (water)
Salt-soluble fraction
Water-soluble fraction
Alcohol-soluble fraction
- Globulin Albumin Prolamin
0.089 ± 0.005 0.555 ± 0.008 0.625 ± 0.003 0.096 ± 0.006
74.44 ± 5.01 100.00 ± 0.00 100.00 ± 0.00 81.67 ± 1.45
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Higher Education Research Promotion and National Research University
Project of Thailand, Office of the Higher Education Commission, through the Food and Functional Food
Research Cluster of Khon Kaen University
References
[1] Sanders TH, Cole RJ, Blankenship PD, Hill RA Relation of environmental stress duration to Aspergillus flavus invasion and
aflatoxin production in preharvest peanuts Peanut Sci 1985;12:90-3
[2] Stanley JS, King N, Burks AW, Huang SK, Sampson H, Cockrell G, Helm RM, West CM, Bannon GA Identification and
mutational analysis of the immunodominant IgE binding epitopes of the major peanut allergen Ara h 2 Arch Biochem Biophys 1997;342,
244–53
[3] Barre A, Borges J-P, Culerrier R, Rougé P Homology modelling of the major peanut allergen Ara h 2 and surface mapping of
IgE-binding epitopes Immunol Lett 2005;100:153-8
[4] Pele M Peanut allergens Romanian Biotechnol Lett 2010;15:5204-12
[5] Hauser M, Egger M, Wallner M, Wopfner N, Schmidt G, Ferreira F Molecular properties of plant food allergens: A current
classification into protein families The Open Immunol J 2008;1:1-12
[6] Schmidt H, Krause S, Gelhaus C, Peterson A, Janssen O, Becker W-M Detection and structural characterization of natural Ara h
7, the third peanut allergen of the 2S albumin family J Proteome Res 2010;9:3701-9
[7] Koppelman SJ, Knol EF, Vlooswijk RA, Wensing M, Knulst AC, Hefle SL, Gruppen H, Piersma S Peanut allergen Ara h 3:
isolation from peanuts and biochemical characterization Allergy 2003;58:1144-51
[8] Lehmann K, Schweimer K, Reese G, Randow S, Vieths S, R¨osch P Structure and stability of 2S albumin-type peanut allergens:
implications for the severity of peanut allergic reactions Biochem J 2006;395:463-72
[9] Katam R, Vasanthaiah HKN, Basha SM Proteomic Approach to Screen Peanut Genotypes with Enhanced Nutritional Qualities In: Frontiers in the Convergence of Bioscience and Information Technologies Korea, 2007
[10] Laemmli UK Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4 Nature 1970;227:239-51
[11] Liang XQ, Luo M, Holbrook CC, Guo BZ Storage protein profiles in Spanish and runner market type peanuts and potential
markers BMC Plant Biol 2006;6:6-24
[12] Marcone MF, Kakuda Y, Yada RY Salt-soluble seed globulins of various dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants-I
Isolation/purification and characterization Food Chem 1998;62:27-47
[13] Basha SMM, Pancholy SK Polypeptide composition of arachin and non-arachin proteins from early bunch peanut (Arachis
hypogaea L.) seed Peanut Sci 1981;8:82-8
[14] El-Beltagi HS Characterization of isoenzymes, enzyme activities and protein profiles of roasted peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
EJEAFChe 2010;9:1099-109
Trang 6[15] Gbadamosi SO, Abiose SH, Aluko RE Solubilization, amino acid composition and electrophoretic characterization of Conophor
nut (Tetracarpidium conophorum) proteins Internat Food Res J 2012;19:651-6
[16] Nicolaou N, Custovic A Molecular diagnosis of peanut and legume allergy: Allergenic proteins Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immnol
2011;11:222-8