Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy: What Does It MeanFor Illinois Ag?. Lauren Lurkins Director of Natural and Environmental Resources Illinois Farm Bureau... STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEME
Trang 1Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy: What Does It Mean
For Illinois Ag?
Lauren Lurkins Director of Natural and Environmental Resources
Illinois Farm Bureau
Trang 2WHY IS THE STRATEGY NEEDED?
• Gulf Hypoxia Task Force
• USEPA Guidance Memo in March 2011
Purpose: Encourage states to develop nutrient reduction strategies while continuing to develop numeric nutrient standards
Lays out 8 elements of a framework
• Federal litigation in Louisiana
Trang 3STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT
Stakeholders met August 2013 – May 2014:
Illinois Department of Agriculture, Illinois EPA
University of Illinois Science Team
Illinois Farm Bureau, Illinois Pork Producers Association, Illinois
Fertilizer and Chemical Association, Illinois Corn Growers
Association, GROWMARK, Inc
Association of Illinois Soil and Water Conservation Districts
University of Illinois Extension
NRCS
Sanitary Districts/Wastewater Treatment Plants
Prairie Rivers Network, Environmental Law and Policy Center, Sierra Club
Illinois Environmental Regulatory Group
Trang 4STRATEGY IS FINAL…NOW GET TO WORK!
• NLRS was finalized and released in July 2015.
• Now work continuing to IMPLEMENT the NLRS.
Trang 5SCIENCE ASSESSMENT
• February 2013 – Illinois EPA partnered with University of Illinois to develop the Science Assessment:
Current conditions in Illinois of nutrient sources and
export by rivers in the state from point and non-point sources
Methods that could be used to reduce these losses and estimates of their effectiveness throughout Illinois
Estimates of the costs of statewide and watershed level application of these methods to reduce nutrient losses to meet TMDL and Gulf of Mexico goals
Trang 6• 8 major river systems used in estimating nutrient loads
• Gaging stations are upriver from the state boundary, so the
estimated area is smaller
• Rock River - Joslin
• Green River - Geneseo
• Illinois River – Valley City
• Kaskaskia River – Venedy Stn.
• Big Muddy River - Murphysboro
• Little Wabash River – Carmi
• Embarras River – Ste Marie
• Vermilion River - Danville
Trang 7RIVERINE LOADS OF NITRATE-N AND TOTAL P
Trang 9SCIENCE ASSESSMENT
Illinois contributes 20% of nitrate (410 M lbs) and
11% of phosphorus (37.5 M lbs) that makes it to the Gulf
Trang 10STRATEGY TARGETS AND COSTS
• Baseline – Average annual loading of nitrate-N and P from the 1980-1996 levels
• Targets – (5 year running average)
N: 15% by 2025, 45% ultimate
P: 25% by 2025, 45% ultimate
• Estimated costs – over $800 million annually from point source and nonpoint source, with no new funding sources
Trang 13N1 MRTN rate, spring-only N application, cover crops on 70
percent of tile-drained and 45 percent non-tiled acres,
bioreactors on 50 percent of acres, wetlands on 30percent
of acres, all ag streams have buffers
N2 MRTN rate, spring-only N application, cover crops on 100
percent of tile-drained and 70 percent of non-tiled acres,
bioreactors on 75percent of acres, perennial crops on
non-tiled acres, point source to 10 mg/L
45 33 4.67 858
N3 MRTN rate, cover crops on 100 percent of tile-drained and 70
percent of non-tiled acres, wetlands on 20 percent of acres,
perennial crops on non-tiled acres, all ag streams have
buffers, point source to 10 mg/L
45 24 4.48 830
N4 MRTN rate, spring-only N application, cover crops on 5
percent of tile-drained acres, bioreactors on 50 percent of
acres, wetlands on 15 percent of acres
20 0.3 3.00 246
N5 MRTN rate, cover crops on 35 percent of tile-drained acres,
bioreactors on 50 percent of acres, wetlands on 15 percent
of acres
20 2 3.00 246
N6 MRTN rate, cover crops on 75 percent of tile-drained and 55
percent of non-tiled acres
20 8 4.78 394
Name Combined practices and scenarios Nitrate-N
(percent reduction)
Total P (percent reduction )
Cost of reduction ($/lb)
Annualized costs (million
$/yr)
Table 3.15 Example statewide nitrate-nitrogen scenarios.
Trang 14AGRICULTURAL NONPOINT SOURCES
Livestock operations - BMPs included for:
Land application of manure
Runoff management from production areas
Separate from the NLRS, we have new environmental rules for AFOs and CAFOs in Illinois
Trang 15KEY NLRS COMPONENTS
• Extends ongoing regulatory and voluntary efforts.
• Identifies priority watersheds for nutrient reduction efforts.
• Lays out strategies for improving collaboration among government, non-profits and industry.
• Defines a process for regular review and revision.
• Creates 6 (and counting) ongoing working groups.
Trang 16ONGOING WORKING GROUPS
1 Policy Work Group
2 Nutrient Monitoring Council
3 Nutrient Science Advisory Committee
4 Agricultural Water Quality Partnership Forum
5 Urban Stormwater Working Group
6 Point Source Working Group
• Summary of all these, meeting agendas, meeting minutes, etc available
on IEPA’s website:
http://www.epa.illinois.gov/topics/water-
quality/watershed-management/excess-nutrients/nutrient-loss-reduction-strategy/index
Trang 17CURRENT IFB NLRS PRIORITIES
• Education and Outreach
• Research
• Implementation
• Evidence
Trang 18EDUCATION AND OUTREACH
IFB:
• Iowa Issues Tour in August
• County Farm Bureau meetings
• FarmWeek, RFD radio, Partners magazine, social media
• Toolkit for CFBs (infographics, social media, handouts, resource guide)
• CBMP website – BMPs
• Conservation Story Map
• External meetings
Trang 20CONSERVATION STORY MAP
Trang 21• Living document, reviewed/revised every 5 years by the Policy Work
Group
• NREC – BMP
http://www.illinoisnrec.org/
Trang 22• 2017 programming – STAY TUNED!!!
• Promotion of other programs
• USDA FSA - CRP/CREP
• USDA NRCS – CSP, EQIP
• Watershed-level - IEPA 319 grants
• Partnerships - RCPP
Trang 23Bureau Lady Landowners Spring Seminar & 4R Field Day
Champaign First Steps I Can Do Video series
Clinton Influence of Manure Management and Cover Crops on Reducing Nutrient Losses Hancock & Adams Water Testing Program
Jo Daviess Cover Crops and Utilization of Nitrogen
Knox Saturated Buffer Field Demonstration
Macoupin Upper Macoupin Creek Watershed Project
Mason Nitrate Awareness and Water Testing Program
Massac, Pulaski-Alexander, Union Nutrient Management Seminar Series
McDonough Nutrient Sampling
Piatt Keeping Our Soil Outta Streams and Rivers
Pike Water Testing in Sny Island Levee and Drainage District
Rock Island, Mercer, Henry,
Whiteside
Early Adopters of Improving Soil Health Thru Nutrient Management
Stephenson, Winnebago-Boone Responsible Nutrient Management
Wayne, Crawford, Edwards,
Hamilton, Lawrence, Richland,
Wabash, White
Tile Drain Monitoring in the Wabash River Valley
Trang 24PARTNERS
23 SWCDs, 12 NRCS offices, 1 FSA office, 5 Extension offices
2 County Farm Bureau Foundations (Two Rivers, Mason)
IL Department of Agriculture
Commodity Groups: IL Corn Growers, IL Pork Prod., IL Milk Prod., IL Beef Association FS: Ag View, Gateway, Stephenson Service Co., Southern, Prairieland, Wabash Valley Council on Best Management Practices (CBMP)
Colleges: Western IL University, John Wood Community College, Wabash Valley College Professional Labs: Key Agricultural Services, Waters Ag Lab
AgriEnergy, CHS, M&M Service
Terry Wysciskalla
Heartlands Conservancy, Lower Kaskaskia Stakeholders Inc (LKSI)
Maschhoff Pork
American Farmland Trust
Central IL Irrigated Growers Association
Sny Island Levee and Drainage District
Klingner and Associates, P.C.
Forest Preserves of Winnebago County, Boone County Conservation District
Trang 25tissue testing programs
Trang 26• Progress will be
reviewed and reported
to the public every 2 years ( FIRST REPORT JULY 2017 ).
• Point sources
• Non-point sources
• INPUTS/HUMAN:
• Ag Water Quality Partnership Forum
Trang 27Baseline of BMP adoption: 2011 July 1 roll-out Questions about
2011 and 2015
Trang 28• Adopt the BMPs that work for you on your farm
• Continuous improvement – 4Rs, cover crops, end of pipe practices
• Tell your neighbors! This will take something happening
on every acre.
• Be willing to talk about what you do.
• We are all in this together!