Oxygenation occurs at the binuclear iron active centre in the hydroxylase component MMOH, to which electrons are passed from NADPH via the reductase component MMOR, along a pathway that
Trang 1Cofactor-independent oxygenation reactions catalyzed by soluble methane monooxygenase at the surface of a modified gold electrode
Yann Astier1*, Suki Balendra2, H Allen O Hill1, Thomas J Smith2†and Howard Dalton2
1
Chemistry Department, University of Oxford, UK;2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Warwick, UK
Soluble methane monooxygenase (sMMO) is a
three-com-ponent enzyme that catalyses dioxygen- and
NAD(P)H-dependent oxygenation of methane and numerous other
substrates Oxygenation occurs at the binuclear iron active
centre in the hydroxylase component (MMOH), to which
electrons are passed from NAD(P)H via the reductase
component (MMOR), along a pathway that is facilitated
and controlled by the third component, protein B (MMOB)
We previously demonstrated that electrons could be passed
to MMOH from a hexapeptide-modified gold electrode and
thus cyclic voltammetry could be used to measure the redox
potentials of the MMOH active site Here we have shown
that the reduction current is enhanced by the presence of
catalase or if the reaction is performed in a flow-cell,
prob-ably because oxygen is reduced to hydrogen peroxide, by
MMOH at the electrode surface and the hydrogen peroxide
then inactivates the enzyme unless removed by catalase or a
continuous flow of solution Hydrogen peroxide production appears to be inhibited by MMOB, suggesting that MMOB
is controlling the flow of electrons to MMOH as it does in the presence of MMOR and NAD(P)H Most importantly,
in the presence of MMOB and catalase, the electrode-asso-ciated MMOH oxygenates acetonitrile to cyanoaldehyde and methane to methanol Thus the electochemically driven sMMO showed the same catalytic activity and regulation by MMOB as the natural NAD(P)H-driven reaction and may have the potential for development into an economic, NAD(P)H-independent oxygenation catalyst The signifi-cance of the production of hydrogen peroxide, which is not usually observed with the NAD(P)H-driven system, is also discussed
Keywords: electrochemical oxygenation; regulatory protein; soluble methane monooxygenase
Soluble methane monooxygenase (sMMO) catalyses
the bacterial oxidation of methane to methanol using
NAD(P)H as cofactor [1] sMMO consists of three
compo-nents: the hydroxylase (MMOH), the reductase (MMOR)
and a regulatory protein (known as MMOB or protein B)
The active site of the enzyme is located on the a subunit of
MMOH and consists of a binuclear iron species located in a
hydrophobic pocket approximately 12 A˚ beneath the
protein surface [2] MMOH, which has an (abc)2
quater-nary structure, interacts with the MMOR component from
which it receives reductant to drive the reaction [3]:
CH4þ NADH þ Hþþ O2! CH3OHþ NADþþ H2O The regulatory protein (MMOB) plays several roles in the catalytic process including modulating the rate of electron transfer between MMOR and MMOH [4,5], altering the redox potential of the binuclear iron site [6], optimizing the interaction between MMOR and MMOH [7], controlling the access of large substrates to the active site [8] and affecting the regioselectivity of substrate oxygenation [9,10] The 15.9-kDa MMOB also exists in a naturally occurring truncated form in which 12 amino acids are lost from the N-terminus This truncated form (MMOBtru) is completely inactive within the sMMO complex [11] The sMMO reaction can also be driven using hydrogen peroxide via the peroxide shunt reaction [10,12], in which case the only protein component required is MMOH and neither NADH nor O2is needed to catalyze substrate oxygenation Indeed MMOB, which facilitates substrate oxygenation in the whole-complex sMMO reaction, actually inhibits the per-oxide shunt [10] Conversely MMOBtru, which has no stimulatory effect on the whole-complex reaction, has little effect on the peroxide shunt reaction [13]
The inability of MMOBtru to facilitate a catalytically competent sMMO complex is supported by electrochemical evidence in which MMOB was able to cause a negative shift
in redox potential of MMOH at a modified gold electrode whereas MMOBtruwas ineffective [6] In these experiments
it was demonstrated that the modified electrode could serve
as the source of electrons to MMOH, thus obviating the need for NADH and MMOR although only direct electron transfer to the MMOH from the electrode was measured
Correspondence to H Dalton, Department of Biological Sciences,
University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Fax: + 44 24 76523568, Tel.: + 44 24 76523552,
E-mail: hdalton@bio.warwick.ac.uk
Abbreviations: sMMO, soluble methane monooxygenase; MMOB,
regulatory component of sMMO; MMOBtru, truncated form of
MMOB; MMOH, hydroxylase component of sMMO; MMOR,
reductase component of sMMO; SCE, saturated calomel electrode.
Enzymes: methane monooxygenase (EC 1.14.13.25).
Note: a web site is also available at http://www.bio.warwick.ac.uk/
dalton/
Note: Y Astier and S Balendra made equal contributions to this
study.
*Present address: Oxford Biosensors, Begbroke Science Park,
Yarnton OX5 1PF, UK.
Present address: Biomedical Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam
University, Howard Street, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK.
(Received 23 September 2002, accepted 3 December 2002)
Trang 2Here we report, for the first time since attempts were made
in the mid-1970s, that such an electron transfer can be
effectively coupled to the oxidation of hydrocarbon
sub-strate that is facilitated by the MMOB protein
Materials and methods
Chemicals and enzymes
The MMOH and MMOR components of sMMO were
purified from Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath) as described
previously [7,14] The regulatory protein used in all
experi-ments was a catalytically active mutant with increased
stability, in which glycine 13 was replaced by a glutamine
Expression in Escherichia coli, affinity purification and
removal of the N-terminal affinity tag were effected as
previously reported [11] MMOBtrucan be prepared from
wild-type MMOB purified from M capsulatus (Bath) by
leaving a purified sample (containing a mixture of MMOB
and MMOBtru) at room temperature for 2–3 days To
ensure we had a homogeneous sample of MMOBtru we
made a construct for expression of MMOBtruin E coli as a
fusion to glutathione S-transferase and prepared the
recombinant truncate by the same method used for the
full-length protein Like the recombinant intact MMOB
[11], the recombinant MMOBtruhad two additional
vector-encoded amino acids (Gly-Ser) at the N-terminus that had
no effect on its catalytic properties
Analytical grade acetonitrile and glycolic acid nitrile
solution (70% in water) were supplied by Fluka Analytical
grade HCl was purchased from BDH, methanol (HPLC
grade) from Prolab, and oxygen and methane (both at 99%
purity) from BOC The water used in electrochemistry
experiments was conductivity water from Nanopure
(resis-tivity 18.2 MW cm) The hexapeptide,
Lys-Cys-Thr-Cys-Cys-Ala, used to modify the gold electrode, was synthesized
using a Pioneer Peptide synthesiser (Applied Biosystems)
and purified by means of HPLC using a Jupiter RPC18
column
Electrochemical measurements
Voltammetric experiments were performed using a
potenti-ostat/galvanostat PGSTAT12 (Autolab) controlled by a
Dell GX110MT computer fitted with GPES software The
surface of the 4-mm diameter gold electrode (Oxford
Electrodes) was modified by cycling the electrode at
reducing potentials in the presence of the hexapeptide, as
described previously [6], to enable electron transfer to
MMOH The counter electrode was a platinum wire (99%
pure) Except where otherwise stated all potentials are
reported in reference to a saturated calomel electrode (SCE)
supplied by Radiometer Analytical and all experiments were
performed at 22C in 25 mMMops pH 7.0
Cyclic voltammetry of MMOH (25 lM) was performed
at 2, 5, 10, 20 and 50 mVÆs)1 between 0 and )0.6 V
Voltammetry to investigate the effects of catalase, MMOB
and MMOBtru and the substrate acetonitrile on electron
transfer to MMOH was also performed between 0 and
)0.6 V, at the scan speed and protein and substrate
concentrations stated for each experiment Where necessary,
the solution contacting the electrodes was ventilated by
means of a stream of air from an electric fan The effect of the substrate methane on the electrochemical properties of the MMOH/MMOB/catalase system was investigated by enclosing the electrode assembly in a PVC chamber in which a 1 : 1 oxygen/methane atmosphere was maintained Detection of the products of substrate oxygenation by the adsorbed MMOH was achieved by holding the potential at )0.5 V for 30 min in the presence of substrate and then removing the liquid (50 lL) from the electrode surface for analysis by GC/MS using a Hewlett-Packard HP 5890A gas chromatograph coupled to a Trio 1000 mass spectrometer Products were identified by reference to authentic samples For the flow cell experiments, eight 1-mm diameter gold electrodes were cast in epoxy resin and polished to mirror finish All electrodes were modified with hexapeptide and four had MMOH adsorbed as well A potential of ) 500 mV vs the 1MKCl Ag/AgCl electrode (equivalent
to approximately)520 mV relative to the SCE) was applied
to all electrodes The counter electrode was a platinum mesh and a silver wire was used a reference Each electrode was monitored individually by a potentiostat A peristaltic pump, P500, from Pharmacia, was used to maintain a flow
of 0.1MTris/H2SO4, pH 7.4, at the electrode surfaces
Results
Direct electrochemistry of the MMOH on the hexapeptide-modified gold electrode from 0 to)0.6 V at various scan rates between 2 mVÆs)1and 50 mVÆs)1indicated the redu-cibility of the binuclear iron centre and its reoxidation by dissolved oxygen (Fig 1) The reduction current peak intensities varied linearly with the square root of the scan
Fig 1 Cyclic voltammetry of MMOH in solution showing current (I)
vs appliedpotential (E) Scans were performed at scanning rates (v) of 2 (solid line), 5 (dotted line), 10 (broken line), 20 (broken/dotted line) and
50 (dashed line) mVÆs)1, from 0 to )0.6 V, using 25 lL of MMOH solution (25 l M ) Peaks currents were linear with respect to the square root of the scan rate, consistent with a diffusion-controlled electron transfer (insert).
Trang 3rate (see inset to Fig 1), which agreed with our earlier
observation [6] and was indicative of a diffusional reaction
During cyclic voltammetry the reduction current changed
from a diffusion-limited current to one in which the current
indicated (by being directly proportional to the scan rate)
that the MMOH protein was absorbed onto the electrode
This was confirmed after repeated cycling for 40 min
(Fig 2) The signal remained unchanged after rinsing the
electrode and undertaking cyclic voltammetry in
protein-free 0.1MTris/H2SO4buffer, pH 7.4 Thus it was possible
to evaluate the rate of electron transfer to MMOH from the
equation: i/nFA¼ kfCo where i is the current intensity in
amperes, n is the number of electrons exchanged (n¼ 2 for
the sMMO system), F is the Faraday constant, A is the
electrode area in cm2, Cois the enzyme concentration in the
thin layer in molÆcm)3 and kf is the potential-dependent
electron transfer constant in s)1 Using the values of the
current (from which the background current had been
subtracted), we can estimate that kffor electron transfer to
MMOH is (3.0 ± 0.6)· 10)5s)1 When the experiment
was repeated in a flow cell in which the liquid phase was
flowed over the electrode, the reduction current proved to be
flow-rate dependent In the presence of adsorbed MMOH
the current was 10 times greater than the control in the
absence of adsorbed protein, suggesting that renewing the
solution at the electrode surface increased the reduction
current significantly One possibility might be that an
inhibitory product was formed by MMOH but that it was
readily removed in the flow-cell experiment
As dioxygen is a substrate in sMMO-catalyzed reactions,
it was possible that the product that was inhibiting current
flow in the static cell experiments was a reduced oxygen
species Addition of catalase to the static cell with the
MMOH-adsorbed electrode resulted in a
catalase-depend-ent increase in reduction currcatalase-depend-ent that appeared to be
diffusion controlled, as evidenced by the increase in current
when the solution was ventilated (Fig 3) These data
strongly suggested that hydrogen peroxide was responsible for the lack of catalytic current in the absence of catalase, presumably because the hydrogen peroxide inactivated MMOH
Addition of MMOB to the MMOH-activated electrode produced an increase in current intensity that was propor-tional to the concentration of MMOB up to a molar ratio of
2 : 1 MMOB:MMOH (Fig 4) The electron transfer rate kf was approximately doubled to (6.2 ± 1.0)· 10)5s)1 If the inactive truncate MMOBtruwas added then no effect on the
Fig 2 Cyclic voltammetry during MMOH adsorption Repeated cyclic
voltammetry was performed at 5 mVÆs)1from 0 to )0.6 V, using
25 lL of MMOH solution (25 l M ) The arrow indicates the evolution
of the reduction waves over 40 min.
Fig 3 MMOH activation by catalase andoxygen MMOH was adsorbed onto the electrode as shown in Fig 2 and then cycled from 0
to )0.6 V at 2 mVÆs )1 The arrow shows the effect of increasing catalase concentrations (0, 2.4, 4.8 and 7.2 l M , respectively) The effect
of ventilating the reaction at the highest catalase concentration was also investigated as shown.
Fig 4 Effect of MMOB on the electrochemistry of MMOH Adsorbed MMOH (prepared as in Fig 2) was cycled from 0 to )0.6 V
at 5 mVÆs)1 Aliquots of MMOB solution (8 l M ) were added to give MMOB : MMOH molar ratios of 0, 0.5, 1, 1.3, 2, 2.5 and 3.5; the arrow shows the effect of increasing concentration of MMOB.
Trang 4electron transfer was detected, the constant kf being the
same as that observed with MMOH alone (data not shown)
When an excess of catalase was added to the MMOH/
MMOB complex the current remained unchanged (Fig 5)
We assume from this that the presence of MMOB
suppressed the production of hydrogen peroxide by
MMOH In the presence of MMOBtru, however, catalase
produced a marked increase in the negative current (data
not shown) indicating that MMOB in its fully active form
prevents hydrogen peroxide formation but its inactive form
(MMOBtru) is unable exert such an effect In the presence of
catalase, a large increase in reduction current was observed
upon addition of the substrate acetonitrile (Fig 5),
consis-tent with the substrate-induced passage of electrons to
MMOH during turnover Acetonitrile produced only a
modest increase in reduction current when MMOB was
replaced by the inactive MMOBtru(data not shown)
When the substrates methane or acetonitrile were added
to the MMOH/MMOB (1 : 2) complex in the absence of
catalase and the electrode was held at a negative potential for 30 min to enable any oxidation products to accumulate (as described in materials and methods), no such products were observed However, when catalase was added to
50 lM, then product (methanol or cyanoaldehyde) was readily observed by gas chromatography that was con-firmed by mass spectrometry No product was observed with MMOH alone or when MMOBtruwas added instead
of MMOB
The reactions inferred to occur at the MMOH-activated electrode under the various conditions tested are summar-ized in Table 1
Discussion
For the first time we have demonstrated that it is possible to use an electrochemical method to drive the oxidation of methane by two components of the sMMO complex (MMOH and MMOB) in the absence of reductant (NADH
or NADPH) and MMOR As in the natural sMMO reaction [11], substrate oxygenation was facilitated by MMOB but not the truncated form MMOBtru Unlike the natural system, however, the conditions for a successful reaction in the electrochemically driven sMMO require that catalase is also present (Table 1)
From these data it is apparent that hydrogen peroxide is produced during the electrochemical oxidation and so it is relevant to ask how the hydrogen peroxide is formed and what role, if any, it plays in the oxygenation reaction When catalase was added to the hexapeptide-modified electrode to which MMOH had been absorbed we observed a large increase in the negative current compared
to the control in which no catalase was present (Fig 3)
We conclude that during the reduction cycle hydrogen peroxide was formed that could be either removed by catalase or its effect diminished by constant removal in the flow cell We have also observed production of hydrogen peroxide when the complete sMMO complex was exposed
to a high concentration of oxygen (Y Jiang and H Dalton, unpublished observations) Here again, addition of catalase would restore full activity through its ability to remove the toxic hydrogen peroxide Thus it appears that hydrogen peroxide is formed when MMOH is either over-reduced (as seen in the electrochemical experiments) or over-oxidized when exposed to excess oxygen This release of hydrogen peroxide under these extreme conditions may
Table 1 Reactions at the MMOH-activatedelectrode.
MMOH Catalytic current increased O 2 + 2H++ 2e– fi H 2 O 2
MMOH + MMOB tru Catalytic current increased O 2 + 2H + + 2e –
fi H 2 O 2
MMOH + MMOB + substrate Catalytic current increased; (a) O 2 + 2H++ 2e– fi H 2 O 2
oxygenated product observedb(b) substrate + O 2 + 2H++ 2e– fi oxygenated product + H 2 O MMOH + MMOB tru + substrate No product observed
in the presence of catalase
Oxygenation reaction (b) did not occur
a
As detailed in the text, oxygenated products were detected by GC-MS and production of hydrogen peroxide was inferred from an increase
in catalytic current upon addition of catalase b As hydrogen peroxide from reaction (a) inactivated the enzyme, oxygenated product from reaction (b) accumulated only when catalase was present.
Fig 5 Effect of catalase, MMOB andacetonitrile on the
electro-chemistry of the MMOH/MMOB complex Adsorbed MMOH/
MMOB (1 : 2 molar ratio) complex (prepared as in Fig 4) was cycled
from 0 to )0.6 V at 5 mVÆs )1 (solid line) Data were also collected after
addition of catalase (to 50 l M ; dotted line) and subsequent addition of
acetonitrile (to 95 l M ; broken line).
Trang 5arise as a result of interaction of reductant or oxidant with
intermediate Pin the catalytic cycle, which is believed to
contain a binuclear iron site-associated peroxo species [5]
Addition of MMOB permits an increase in electron flow to
MMOH and also appears to regulate and shutdown the
production of hydrogen peroxide as there was no change
in the current intensity when catalase is added to the
MMOH/MMOB complex It is possible that a
confor-mational change in the MMOH protein is necessary to
stop overproduction of hydrogen peroxide and that this is
induced by MMOB, although not by MMOBtru Earlier
studies by small-angle X-ray scattering spectroscopy
(SAXS) have also shown that such a conformational
change is induced by the active MMOB and not MMOBtru
[7]
The most interesting result arises when substrate (either
methane or acetonitrile) is added to the system Product was
only observed when MMOH/MMOB and catalase were
present (Table 1) In the absence of catalase or MMOB no
product was formed It is possible to rationalize these
observations by proposing a possible new role for MMOB
and hydrogen peroxide As indicated above we suggest that
MMOB normally serves to shut down hydrogen peroxide
formation in the absence of oxidizable substrate In the
presence of substrate, however, catalase is essential for the
formation of product as hydrogen peroxide is toxic We
postulate that one role for MMOB is to act as a sensor for
substrate In the absence of substrate, MMOB can stimulate
electron transfer from the electrode to MMOH but it does
not result in hydrogen peroxide formation because there is
no substrate present When substrate is present we observe
formation of both hydrogen peroxide and product The
paradox that needs to be resolved here is if hydrogen
peroxide production is shut down by MMOB why is it
observed when substrate is added? Here the sensor role of
MMOB may come into play We postulate that a complex is
formed between MMOB/MMOH and substrate that is
different from that in the absence of substrate In this
substrate-associated complex the active site now permits an
interaction between the substrate and the active oxygen
species to generate product
Previous data have led to the conclusion that the species
responsible for oxygenation of substrate is the diferryl
intermediate Q, which forms after intermediate Pduring
single-turnover kinetics [15,16] As, under appropriate
conditions, hydrogen peroxide is known to oxidize methane
directly to form methanol [17], the data presented here
permit the alternative conclusion that intermediate Q may
be the result of a side reaction and hydrogen peroxide per se
is effecting the oxidation of substrate Indeed the reactivity
of hydrogen peroxide may well be far greater in its
nonaquated form within the highly hydrophobic pocket
adjacent to the binuclear iron centre [2,18] than aquated
hydrogen peroxide in the bulk solution The need for
catalase in the electrochemically driven reaction is therefore
to protect the protein from inactivation by excess hydrogen
peroxide that has escaped from the enzyme and become
aquated, whilst methane oxidation may be catalysed by
nonaquated hydrogen peroxide at the active site
A further complication arises when one considers that
hydrogen peroxide is able to drive methane oxidation to
methanol by MMOH alone via the peroxide shunt reaction
[10] Why is hydrogen peroxide not inhibitory under these circumstances? The answer, we believe, is quite straightfor-ward In the electrochemical experiments hydrogen peroxide
is being generated as an intermediate in low levels It is only formed under two circumstances: (a) when MMOH is absorbed to the electrode in the absence of full-length MMOB and (b) when the MMOH, active MMOB and substrate are all present In the first instance this is a simple unregulated formation of hydrogen peroxide due to over-reduction of the enzyme at the electrode In the second instance the hydrogen peroxide is formed as a catalytic intermediate The peroxide shunt reaction is based entirely upon Le Chatelier’s principle Free hydrogen peroxide is inhibitory, but to drive the reaction high concentrations are needed to form intermediate P The catalytic efficiency of the peroxide shunt reaction is not high, the maximum rate
of methane oxygenation being only approximately 10% of that observed with the whole sMMO system; moreover, the enzyme becomes inactivated as the peroxide shunt reaction proceeds [10]
MMOB (and not MMOBtru) is inhibitory to the peroxide shunt reaction [10] but is required for the whole-complex sMMO reaction and for the electrochemical reaction here These observations can be explained if it is presumed that MMOB has two effects during the catalytic cycle of sMMO,
a stimulatory role before compound Pformation and an inhibitory role thereafter Thus, the stimulatory effect of MMOB predominates when the oxidant is dioxygen and electrons (from MMOR or the modified gold electrode) are required for formation of compound P In the peroxide shunt reaction, however, the natural pathway to compound Pis bypassed and so only the later, inhibitory effect of MMOB is observed Consistent with this hypothesis, fast-reaction kinetics have shown that MMOB accelerates compound Pformation by approximately 1000-fold [19], whilst steady-state experiments have shown that MMOB stimulates whole-complex sMMO activity at low molar ratios with respect to MMOH, but begins to inhibit it when the MMOB : MMOH molar ratio exceeds 2 [20]
In conclusion we observe that methanol is formed from methane by MMOH and MMOB when absorbed to an electrode surface, via a reaction that may involve hydrogen peroxide as an important intermediate Conformational changes in MMOH induced by MMOB appear to be critical in the catalytic cycle
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) and British Gas PLC through a Hub studentship (to S.B) We thank Susan Slade for expert technical assistance during protein purification.
References
1 Colby, J & Dalton, H (1978) Resolution of the methane mono-oxygenase of Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath) into three compo-nents Biochem J 171, 461–468.
2 Rosenzweig, A.C., Frederick, C.A., Lippard, S.J & Nordlund, P (1993) Crystal structure of a bacterial nonheme iron hydroxylase that catalyzes the biological oxidation of methane Nature 366, 537–543.
Trang 63 Lund, J., Woodland, M.P & Dalton, H (1985) Electron transfer
reactions in the soluble methane monooxygenase of
Methylo-coccus capsulatus (Bath) Eur J Biochem 147, 297–305.
4 Green, J & Dalton, H (1985) Protein B of soluble methane
monooxygenase from Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath) J Biol.
Chem 260, 15795–15801.
5 Liu, K.E., Valentine, A.M., Qiu, D., Edmondson, D.E.,
Apple-man, E.H., Spiro, T.G & Lippard, S.J (1995) Characterisation of
a diiron (III) peroxo intermediate in the reaction cycle of methane
monooxygenase hydroxylase from Methylococcus capsulatus
(Bath) J Am Chem Soc 117, 4997–4998.
6 Kazlauskaite, H., Hill, H.A.O., Wilkins, P.C & Dalton, H (1996)
Direct electrochemistry of the hydroxylase of soluble methane
monooxygenase from Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath) Eur J.
Biochem 241, 552–556.
7 Gallagher, S.C., Callaghan, A.J., Zhao, J., Dalton, H & Trewhella,
J (1999) Global conformational changes control the reactivity of
methane monooxygenase Biochemistry 38, 6752–6760.
8 Wallar, B.J & Lipscomb, J.D (2001) Methane monooxygenase
component B mutants alter the kinetics of steps throughout the
catalytic cycle Biochemistry 40, 2220–2233.
9 Froland, W.A., Andersson, K.K., Lee, S.-K., Liu, Y & Lipscomb,
J.D (1992) Methane monooxygenase component B and reductase
alter the regioselectivity of the hydroxylase component-catalysed
reactions J Biol Chem 267, 17588–17597.
10 Jiang, Y., Wilkins, P.C & Dalton, H (1993) Activation of the
hydroxylase of sMMO from Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath) by
hydrogen peroxide Biochim Biophys Acta 1163, 105–112.
11 Lloyd, J.S., Bhambra, A., Murrell, J.C & Dalton, H (1997)
Inactivation of the regulatory protein B of soluble methane
monooxygenase from Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath) by
pro-teolysis can be overcome by a Gly to Gln modification Eur J.
Biochem 248, 72–79.
12 Andersson, K.K., Froland, W.A., Lee, S.-K & Lipscomb, J.D (1991) Dioxygen independent oxygenation of hydrocarbons by methane monooxygenase hydroxylase component New J Chem.
15, 411–415.
13 Callaghan, A.J., Smith, T.J., Slade, S.E & Dalton, H (2002) Residues near the N-terminus of protein B control autocatalytic proteolysis and the activity of soluble methane mono-oxygenase Eur J Biochem 269, 1835–1843.
14 Pilkington, S.J & Dalton, H (1990) Soluble methane mono-oxygenase from Methylococcus capsulatus Bath Methods Enzymol 188, 181–190.
15 Lee, S.-K., Nesheim, J.C & Lipscomb, J.D (1993) Transient in-termediates of the methane monooxygenase catalytic cycle J Biol Chem 268, 21569–21577.
16 Shu, L., Nesheim, J.C., Kauffmann, K., Mu¨nck, E., Lipscomb, J.D & Que, L (1997) An Fe IV
2 O 2 diamond core structure for the key intermediate Q of methane monooxygenase Science 257, 515–518.
17 Nagiev, T.M., Faradzhev, E.G & Mamedov, E.M (2001) Oxi-dation of methane to methanol by hydrogen peroxide under pressure Russ J Phys Chem 75, 43–48.
18 George, A.R., Wilkins, P.C & Dalton, H (1996) A computational investigation of the possible substrate binding sites in the hydro-xylase of soluble methane monooxygenase J Mol Catal B 2, 103–113.
19 Liu, Y., Nesheim, J.C., Lee, S.-K & Lipscomb, J.D (1995) Gating effects of component B on oxygen activation by the methane monooxygenase hydroxylase component J Biol Chem 270, 24662–24665.
20 Gassner, G.T & Lippard, S.J (1999) Component interactions in the soluble methane monooxygenase from Methylococcus capsu-latus (Bath) Biochem 38, 12768–12785.