1. Trang chủ
  2. » Thể loại khác

Logic as a tool a guide to formal logical reasoning ( PDFDrive ) 114

1 4 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề Logic as a Tool: A Guide to Formal Logical Reasoning
Chuyên ngành Formal Logical Reasoning
Thể loại pdf
Định dạng
Số trang 1
Dung lượng 68,46 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

k The proofs differ again for each deductive system as they use the specific notion of derivation in each of them.. Next, let us revisit the notion of soundness by redefining it in two d

Trang 1

k

The proofs differ again for each deductive system as they use the specific notion of derivation in each of them I leave them as useful exercises

Next, let us revisit the notion of soundness by redefining it in two different ways

Definition 64 (Soundness 1) A deductive system D is sound1 if for every theory Γ and

a formula A ,

ΓDA implies Γ |= A.

Definition 65 (Soundness 2) A deductive system D is sound2if for every theory Γ,

if Γ is satisfiable then Γ is D-consistent.

We therefore now have two different definitions of soundness: one in terms of logical and deductive consequence, and the other in terms of satisfiability and deductive consis-tency These definitions are in fact equivalent and the proof of that, left as an exercise, is quite generic for all deductive systems using Propositions 60 and 63

As I have already stated in the respective sections, each of our deductive systems is sound (in either sense) I leave the proofs of these as exercises Let us now turn to com-pleteness

Definition 66 (Completeness 1) A deductive system D is complete1 if for every theory

Γ and a formula A ,

Γ|= A implies Γ DA.

Definition 67 (Completeness 2) A deductive system D is complete2if for every theory Γ,

if Γ is D-consistent then Γ is satisfiable.

Again, we have two different definitions of completeness, one in terms of logical and deductive consequence and the other in terms of satisfiability and deductive consistency

As for soundness, these definitions are equivalent and the proof is again generic for all deductive systems, using Propositions 60 and 63 These proofs are left as an exercise

Proposition 68 (Maximal consistent theory 1) Every maximal D-consistent theory Γ

is closed under deductive consequence in D, that is, for any formula A , if Γ DA then

A ∈ Γ.

Proof: Exercise

Definition 69 (D-completeness) A theory Γ is D-complete if it is D-consistent and for

every formula A , Γ DA or Γ D¬ A

Proposition 70 (Maximal consistent theory 2) A theory Γ is a maximal D-consistent

theory iff it is closed under deductive consequence in D and is D-complete.

The proof is generic, similar for each D, and left as an easy exercise.

Ngày đăng: 28/10/2022, 15:12