1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Báo cáo khoa học: P-Glycoprotein is localized in intermediate-density membrane microdomains distinct from classical lipid rafts and caveolar domains potx

14 303 0
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề P-glycoprotein is localized in intermediate-density membrane microdomains distinct from classical lipid rafts and caveolar domains
Tác giả Galina Radeva, Jocelyne Perabo, Frances J. Sharom
Người hướng dẫn F. J. Sharom
Trường học University of Guelph
Chuyên ngành Molecular and Cellular Biology
Thể loại báo cáo khoa học
Năm xuất bản 2005
Thành phố Guelph
Định dạng
Số trang 14
Dung lượng 521,6 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

We recently reported that the nonionic detergents Brij-96 and Triton X-100 isolated different lipid raft microdomains from rat basophilic leukemia RBL-2H3 cells [37].. In addition, we fo

Trang 1

membrane microdomains distinct from classical lipid rafts and caveolar domains

Galina Radeva, Jocelyne Perabo and Frances J Sharom

Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada

In recent years, intense interest has been focussed on

the properties and biological functions of specialized

membrane domains known as lipid rafts [1,2] Rafts

consist of cholesterol–sphingolipid-rich regions within

the plasma membrane, stabilized by interactions

between cholesterol and the long saturated acyl chains

of sphingolipids They are thought to exist in the liquid-ordered phase, which has properties intermedi-ate between those of the liquid-crystalline and gel phases [3,4] Acylated and lipid-modified proteins are

Key words

ABC transporter; caveolin-1;

detergent-resistant membranes; lipid rafts;

P-glycoprotein

Correspondence

F J Sharom, Department of Molecular and

Cellular Biology, University of Guelph,

Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1

Fax: +519 837 1802

Tel: +519 824 4120; ext 52247

E-mail: fsharom@uoguelph.ca

(Received 11 May 2005, revised 27 July

2005, accepted 4 August 2005)

doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04905.x

P-glycoprotein (Pgp), a member of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) super-family responsible for the ATP-driven extrusion of diverse hydrophobic molecules from cells, is a cause of multidrug resistance in human tumours Pgp can also operate as a phospholipid and glycosphingolipid flippase, and has been functionally linked to cholesterol, suggesting that it might be associated with sphingolipid–cholesterol microdomains in cell membranes

We have used nonionic detergent extraction and density gradient centrifu-gation of extracts from the multidrug-resistant Chinese hamster ovary cell line, CHRB30, to address this question Our data indicate that Pgp is localized in intermediate-density membrane microdomains different from classical lipid rafts enriched in Src-family kinases We demonstrate that Brij-96 can selectively isolate the Pgp domains, separating them from the caveolar and classical lipid rafts Pgp was found entirely in the Brij-96-insoluble domains, and only partially in the Triton X-100-Brij-96-insoluble membrane microdomains We studied the sensitivity of these domains to cholesterol removal, as well as their relationship to GM1 ganglioside- and caveolin-1-enriched caveolar domains We found that the buoyant density

of the Brij-96-based Pgp-containing microdomains was sensitive to choles-terol removal by methyl-b-cyclodextrin The Brij-96 domains retained their structural integrity after cholesterol depletion while, in contrast, the Triton X-100-based caveolin-1⁄ GM1 microdomains did not Using confocal fluor-escence microscopy, we determined that caveolin-1 and GM1 colocalized, while Pgp and caveolin-1, or Pgp and GM1, did not Our results suggest that Pgp does not interact directly with caveolin-1, and is localized in inter-mediate-density domains, distinct from classical lipid rafts and caveolae, which can be isolated using Brij-96

Abbreviations

ABC, ATP-binding cassette; BSS, buffered saline solution; CTB, cholera toxin B subunit; CTB–HRP, cholera toxin B–horseradish peroxidase conjugate; DRM, detergent-resistant membranes; ECL, enhanced chemiluminescence; MbCD, methyl-b-cyclodextrin; MDR, multidrug resistance ⁄ resistant; MEM, minimal essential medium; MRP, multidrug-resistance-associated protein; NaCl ⁄ P i , phosphate-buffered saline; Pgp, P-glycoprotein.

Trang 2

often sequestered into lipid rafts, probably as a result

of their acyl chain properties; GPI-anchored proteins

are found in the outer leaflet, and Src-family tyrosine

kinases are found in the inner leaflet Substantial

evi-dence supports the existence of lipid raft microdomains

in model membrane systems in vitro, and in intact cells

in vivo[5–7], although there is still controversy

regard-ing their size and dynamic properties [8]

Pgp (P-glycoprotein, MDR1, ABCB1) is an

energy-dependent drug efflux pump that is a member of the

ATP-binding cassette (ABC) family of proteins [9]

Pgp decreases the intracellular concentration of a wide

variety of drugs and hydrophobic molecules by actively

transporting them across the plasma membrane,

pow-ered by ATP hydrolysis at two cytoplasmic

nucleotide-binding domains Pgp has been proposed to act as a

drug flippase or a hydrophobic ‘vacuum cleaner’ [10]

Under normal physiological conditions Pgp is involved

in cellular detoxification leading to cell survival;

however, in cancer cells its overexpression confers a

multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotype thus causing

chemotherapy failure [11] An accompanying change in

many cells expressing MDR transporters, including

Pgp, is elevated levels of certain sphingolipids [12–14]

The ATPase activity of Pgp is modulated by lipids

[15–17], and its interaction with drug substrates

depends on the lipid surroundings [18] Pgp has also

been associated with active cholesterol redistribution

across the plasma membrane [19], and cholesterol

affected its drug binding [18,20], transport and ATPase

activity [21–24] Pgp is functional when reconstituted

into a sphingomyelin-cholesterol mixture that mimics

lipid rafts [25]; however, it can carry out both ATP

hydrolysis and drug transport in bilayers of only

phos-phatidylcholine [17,26], so cholesterol is not required

for its function As sphingolipids and cholesterol are

both components of lipid rafts, the fine interplay

between lipid environment and Pgp function may be

linked to the membrane microdomain organization of

the protein

Raft domains have been isolated from intact cells

based on their insolubility in cold nonionic detergents,

especially Triton X-100, and their low buoyant density

in sucrose gradients The resulting detergent-resistant

membranes (DRM) are believed to arise from the

coalescence of smaller raft structures on the cell

surface Caveolin-1, a 21 kDa transmembrane

choles-terol-binding protein, is the primary constituent of

invaginated plasma membrane structures called

caveo-lae Caveolar and noncaveolar DRM microdomains

represent distinct plasma membrane regions [27,28]

Caveolin-1, GM1 ganglioside and cholesterol are

believed to be hallmarks of caveolae which are distinct

from the classical lipid rafts that are enriched in GPI-anchored proteins, cholesterol and GM1, but do not contain caveolins [29] Up-regulation of caveolin-1 and caveolae has been observed in MDR cells expressing Pgp, suggesting a functional link between them [30,31] Interestingly, Pgp was reported to appear in the low density membrane fractions in Triton X-100 extracts [32], as well as in detergent-free cell extracts [21] Demeule and coworkers found that Pgp was contained

in the caveolae in MDR cells and blood–brain barrier endothelial cells [33,34] In contrast, Hinrichs et al determined that Pgp was localized in the noncaveolar rafts [35], while flow cytometry and confocal

microsco-py showed that a substantial fraction of Pgp was asso-ciated with lipid rafts and the cytoskeleton in human colon carcinoma cells [36]

We recently reported that the nonionic detergents Brij-96 and Triton X-100 isolated different lipid raft microdomains from rat basophilic leukemia (RBL-2H3) cells [37] We therefore employed these detergents

to investigate the microdomain localization of Pgp in the MDR cell line CHRB30 In the present work, we showed that this ABC transporter is localized in inter-mediate-density membrane microdomains that are dis-tinct from caveolar domains and Src kinase-containing classical lipid rafts We also showed that these domains are differentially extracted by Brij-96, but not

by Triton X-100 In addition, we found that Brij-96 segregates caveolar domains from Src kinase-based classical lipid rafts, leading to distinct sets of fractions containing each class of raft Triton X-100 extraction apparently leads to the copartitioning of different types

of membrane microdomains ino a common pool Tri-ton X-100 rafts are disrupted by cholesterol removal, whereas the Brij-96 rafts change their buoyant density, but maintain their structural integrity

Results

Pgp is localized in intermediate-density membrane microdomains

DRM are commonly isolated by cold nonionic deter-gent extraction followed by sucrose density centrifuga-tion We previously showed that Brij-96 and Triton X-100 isolate lipid rafts with different physical and biochemical properties from RBL-2H3 cells [37] In this work, we used a similar approach to investigate the membrane domain localization of Pgp Brij-96 or Triton X-100 extracts of CHRB30 cells expressing Pgp were subjected to sucrose density gradient flotation, and the distribution of Pgp among the fractions was determined by western blotting

Trang 3

Triton X-100 extraction of CHRB30 cells yielded a

bimodal distribution for Pgp (Fig 1A, right panel, top

row) This type of distribution is typical for the protein

constituents of classical lipid rafts, such as

GPI-anchored proteins and the Src tyrosine kinases A

significant amount of Pgp was observed in the

low-density lipid raft fractions 4–6, while the majority of

the transporter remained in the high-density fractions

9–11 However, in the density gradient fractions from

Brij-96 extracts, Pgp displayed a continuous

distribu-tion in fracdistribu-tions 2–10, peaking in fracdistribu-tions 5 and 6

(Fig 1A, left panel, top row) This pattern of Pgp

par-titioning along the sucrose density gradient is quite

unlike the picture observed for the known constituents

of lipid rafts, such as GPI-anchored proteins or Src

kinases In our previous work, we showed that under

the same conditions, the lipid raft protein Thy-1 of

RBL-2H3 cells is concentrated entirely in the lowest

density lipid raft fractions 2–4 [37] We have therefore

termed the fractions in which Pgp is incorporated, as

intermediate-density fractions The data indicated that

all of the Pgp in CHRB30 cells is localized in Brij-96-based domains that are completely resistant to solubili-zation with this detergent Furthermore, Pgp is only partially located in the Triton X-100-resistant DRM, and about half of it can be solubilized by extraction with this detergent

Pgp is an N-glycosylated protein [38], and because glycosylation may affect the membrane domain local-ization of proteins, we examined whether the glycosy-lation status of Pgp had any bearing on its distribution

in the density gradient after extraction using Brij-96

To address this, we used the CHRPHAR cell line (a lectin-resistant variant of the parental line used to derive CHRB30), which is deficient in N-linked glyco-sylation The results presented in Fig 1A show that the profile for Pgp localization in the sucrose density gradient is very similar when either cell line is used with each of the detergents (compare first and second rows) We conclude that glycosylation does not play

a role in the partitioning of Pgp into intermediate-density microdomains

A

B

Fig 1 Sucrose density gradient partitioning

of P-glycoprotein (Pgp) and markers of clas-sical lipid rafts (A) CHRB30 cells or

CH R PHA R cells (second row only) were lysed in either 0.5% (w ⁄ v) Brij-96 or 1% (w ⁄ v) Triton X-100 at 4 C, and postnuclear lysates were fractionated by ultracentrifuga-tion on a discontinuous sucrose gradient A total of 13 fractions was collected from the top of the gradient tube and an aliquot from each fraction was run on SDS ⁄ PAGE Separ-ated proteins were transferred to a nitrocel-lulose membrane and the presence of Pgp, Yes, caveolin-1 (Cav-1), and CD71 was observed by western immunoblot analysis and enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection, as described in the Experimental procedures (B) CH R B30, RBL-2H3 and Jur-kat cells were lysed in Triton X-100 at 4 C Lysates were precleared by centrifugation at

10 000 g for 5 min An aliquot from each

extract was run on SDS ⁄ PAGE, and the separated proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and analyzed for Src-family kinases (Lck, Lyn, and Yes) by western immunoblot analysis and ECL.

Trang 4

Comparison of the density gradient partitioning

of Pgp and markers of classical lipid rafts

CHRB30 cells have little or no expression of the most

common GPI-anchored proteins, such as Thy-1,

alka-line phosphatase, decay accelerating factor, etc We

therefore employed Src family tyrosine kinases for the

identification of classical lipid rafts and comparison

with the intermediate-density Pgp membrane domains

First, we determined which members of the Src

tyro-sine kinase family are expressed in CHRB30 cells, using

extracts from RBL-2H3 and Jurkat cells as positive

controls (Fig 1B) Of the three proteins we tested for

(Lck, Lyn and Yes), Lyn was expressed only in

RBL-2H3 cells, and Lck only in Jurkat cells, whereas Yes

was seen in both of these cell lines In CHRB30 cells

we found that only Yes kinase was detectable

Next, we investigated how the distribution of Yes

kin-ase along the density gradient compared with that of

Pgp When Triton X-100 was used, Yes kinase resided

in almost the same fractions as Pgp A portion of Yes

kinase partitioned into the low-density sucrose fractions

3–6, while a significant amount (about half) remained

in the high-density fractions 10–13 (Fig 1A, third row,

right panel) When Brij-96 was used, Pgp and Yes kinase

did not copartition, as determined by density

centrifuga-tion (Fig 1A, third row, left panel) Yes kinase was

localized exclusively in the lowest-density fractions 1–4

This localization is similar to that obtained for another

Src-family tyrosine kinase, Lyn, whose sucrose density

gradient partitioning was examined in RBL-2H3 cells

following extraction with Brij-96 [37] The data

presen-ted in Fig 1A indicate that Pgp is localized in

mem-brane microdomains that are distinct from classical lipid

rafts containing Src-family tyrosine kinases The

mem-brane microdomains containing Pgp displayed an

inter-mediate density in the sucrose gradient when Brij-96 was

used They can be separated from classical lipid rafts if

extracted with Brij-96, but not with Triton X-100

The total protein content of each fraction was

meas-ured by the bicinchoninic acid assay, as shown in

Fig 2 (lower panel) Both detergents solubilized the

majority of cellular proteins, leaving them in the

high-density soluble fractions 11–13 Brij-96 extraction

resulted in small, but detectable, amounts of protein in

the low density fractions, whereas Triton X-100

extrac-tion resulted in virtually no protein in these fracextrac-tions

Relationship of the intermediate-density

Pgp-containing microdomains to caveolae

It is well-documented that at least two types of

deter-gent-insoluble membrane microdomains exist The

first class encompasses the classical lipid rafts (or noncaveolar lipid rafts), which contain GPI-anchored proteins and Src-family kinases, while the other class represents the caveolar raft microdomains, with cave-olin as a hallmark protein We examined the possible relationship between the intermediate-density mem-brane structures in which Pgp is found, and caveolae structures, by assessing copartitioning of Pgp and caveolin-1 in the sucrose density gradient fractions Caveolin-1 was concentrated in fractions 4–8 in both

of the detergent extracts, although in the case of Tri-ton X-100 there was tailing out to fractions 11–12 (Fig 1A, fourth row) Importantly, the localization of caveolin-1 displayed a significant overlap with that of Pgp in both the low-density fractions from Triton X-100 extracts and in the intermediate-density frac-tions from Brij-96 extracts (Fig 1A, compare the first row with the third row)

These results suggest two interesting possibilities First, Brij-96 appears to differentially isolate the caveolar (fractions 4–8, caveolin-1 marker) from

Fig 2 Protein and GM 1 profile of Triton X-100 and Brij-96 sucrose density gradients Post-nuclear lysates of detergent extracts of

CH R B30 cells were run on sucrose gradients, and the gradient frac-tions were assayed for the distribution of total protein and GM 1

ganglioside, as described in the Experimental procedures The pro-tein content is shown for a 20 lL aliquot of each gradient fraction from 5–10 · 10 8

cells lysed in 1 mL of buffer, and the activity of cholera toxin B–horseradish peroxidase conjugate (CTB–HRP) in a

50 lL aliquot of each gradient fraction from 2–3 · 10 8 cells is indi-cated Data are displayed as the mean ± range; where error bars are not visible, they are contained within the symbols.

Trang 5

noncaveolar (fractions 1–4, Yes marker) lipid rafts.

Such a distribution was not observed in the sucrose

density fractions from the Triton X-100 extracts The

observed differences were not an artefact of the

deter-gent used because the integral membrane protein,

CD71 (transferrin receptor), was fully solubilized by

both Brij-96 and Triton X-100 (Fig 1A, bottom row)

Second, the Pgp distribution profile partially

over-lapped with that of caveolin-1, but not with that of

Yes kinase, when Brij-96 was used This observation

suggests that the intermediate-density fractions

con-taining Pgp might represent caveolar membrane

struc-tures Such an idea is in agreement with previous

reports suggesting a close interaction between Pgp and

caveolin-1 [33,34] However, this observation does not

necessarily signify molecular colocalization of Pgp and

caveolin-1 For example, all three proteins – Pgp, Yes,

and caveolin-1 – segregate into membrane domains of

similar density when Triton X-100 is used to prepare

the cell extracts, but exhibit different distribution

patterns in the case of Brij-96 detergent extraction

(Fig 1A) The potential colocalization of Pgp and

caveolin-1 was therefore further examined directly by

confocal fluorescence microscopy and

immunoprecipi-tation experiments, as described below

Identification of lipid raft microdomains by

detection of lipid raft-associated GM1ganglioside

GM1 ganglioside is a known marker of both classical

lipid rafts and caveolae This glycosphingolipid has

been shown to cofractionate not only with markers of

various detergent-insoluble microdomains (such as

caveolae, GPI-anchored protein-enriched rafts, and

glycosphingolipid-enriched domains), but also to

colo-calize with caveolin-1 [39] We employed a cholera

toxin B–horseradish peroxidase conjugate (CTB–HRP)

enzyme assay to identify the fractions into which lipid

raft-associated GM1 partitions (Fig 2, upper panel)

For Triton X-100, these were fractions 5, 6, and 7 In

the density gradient of Brij-96 extracts, GM1 was

detected in fractions 2–5 This pattern is very similar

to that observed for GM1 in RBL-2H3 cells [37];

how-ever, the peak seen for GM1 localization in the

CHRB30 gradient fractions is somewhat broader The

gradient partitioning of GM1(Fig 2, upper panel)

par-tially overlaps with the Yes kinase classical lipid rafts

fractions on the one hand, and with the

caveolin-1-enriched raft fractions on the other (Fig 1A) This

broader profile can be explained by the fact that GM1

is a constituent of both classical lipid rafts and

caveo-lae The high level of GM1 apparently present in the

high density fractions of the gradient in Fig 2 (upper

panels), which is not observed in the dot-blots (Fig 6, panel B) is probably spurious This was also reported

by Blank et al [40], and could arise from the presence

of soluble HRP-like activity in the cells

Examination of Pgp and caveolin-1 localization

by confocal fluorescence microscopy and immunoprecipitation

We wanted to determine whether the intermediate-density fractions containing Pgp in the Brij-96 extract represent caveolar membrane microdomains Demeule

et al reported that Pgp and caveolin-1 coimmunopre-cipitated in extracts from Pgp-expressing CHRC5 cells and brain capillary membranes [33] We tested the coimmunoprecipitation of Pgp and caveolin-1 using the pooled lipid raft fractions from the Brij-96 and Triton-100 extracts However, we were unable to detect coimmunoprecipitation between the two pro-teins under these conditions We decided therefore to examine their potential association using total cell extracts because these would contain the entire pool

of Pgp and caveolin-1 Cell extracts were prepared using various lysis buffer conditions Combinations of different detergents were used to establish whether the choice of detergent plays a role in the observation of coimmunoprecipitation of the two proteins Hinrichs and coworkers had already reported a weak associ-ation of multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1) with caveolin-1 when Lubrol was used, but saw no such association in the presence of Triton

X-100 [35] In our experiments, all buffers contained sufficient detergent to disrupt the vesicles previously observed to exist in the DRM fractions [37] Other-wise, a false impression of coimmunoprecipitation would be obtained if the two proteins were simply located in the same vesicular structure Under these conditions, only a very faint band of Pgp was seen in the caveolin-1 immunoprecipitates (Fig 3A, top), but

no signal for caveolin-1 was detected in the Pgp immune complexes (Fig 3A, bottom), suggesting that there is no significant coimmunoprecipitation between the two proteins A signal for caveolin-1 in Pgp immu-noprecipitates was seen only after prolonged overnight exposure (Fig 3B, bottom), while an enhanced Pgp band was seen in the caveolin-1 immunoprecipitates when the film was overexposed (Fig 3B, top) We sug-gest that either a very small fraction of the two pro-teins is associated with each other, or that they are located close together in the membrane, but not directly interacting with one another This result agrees with the results of confocal immunofluorescence analysis (see below) and is in accordance with the

Trang 6

work of Hinrichs et al [35], who also reported no

coimmunoprecipitation between the two proteins in

2780AD human ovarian carcinoma cells

We further examined the possible cellular

colocaliza-tion of the two proteins by confocal fluorescence

microscopy We first examined the colocalization of

GM1 and caveolin-1 in CHRB30 cells The individual

staining patterns for GM1 and caveolin-1 were very

similar; bright punctuate spots were observed, mainly

on the plasma membrane (Fig 4A,B) When the

sig-nals from the two dyes, Alexa488 and Alexa594, were superimposed, there were several areas of clear lap, as indicated by the yellow colour (Fig 4C, over-lay) This observation indicates a close colocalization

of GM1 and caveolin-1 in some regions of the cell, probably in the caveolar raft domains Next we investi-gated the localization of Pgp and GM1 (Fig 4D,E)

We found that the cellular localization patterns of Pgp and GM1 were distinct and did not overlap, indicating that the two molecules do not directly interact (Fig 4F) When the localization of caveolin-1 and Pgp was compared, the signals for these proteins were, once again, very distinct (Fig 4G,H) Both caveolin-1 and Pgp maintained the pattern described above Pgp displayed staining at the plasma membrane but also

A

B

Fig 3 Immunoprecipitation of P-glycoprotein (Pgp) and caveolin-1.

(A) Lanes 1 and 6, Brij-96 extracts; lanes 2 and 7, Triton X-100

extracts; lanes 3 and 8, Nonidet P-40 ⁄ Triton X-100 ⁄ octylglucoside

extracts; lanes 4 and 9, Brij-96 ⁄ radioimmunoprecipitation assay

(RIPA) extracts; lanes 5 and 10, Triton X-100 ⁄ RIPA extracts One

microgram of each anti-Pgp or anti-(caveolin-1) immunoglobulin was

added to 500 lL of cell extracts Immune complexes were

collec-ted on Protein-A–Sepharose beads and washed twice in the

appro-priate buffer The immunoprecipitated proteins were extracted in

Laemmli’s sample buffer One half of each immunoprecipitation

sample was run on 7.5% nonreducing SDS ⁄ PAGE for Pgp analysis

(A and B top) The other half of each sample was run on 12%

non-reducing SDS ⁄ PAGE for caveolin-1 analysis (A and B, bottom)

Sep-arated proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and

analysed by western immunoblot (IB) analysis and enhanced

chemi-luminescence The film exposure time in (A) was 5 min; (B) is an

overnight exposure of (A).

Cav-1

overlay

GM 1

Fig 4 Confocal fluorescence microscopy analysis of P-glycoprotein (Pgp) and caveolin-1 localization CH R B30 cells grown in monolayer culture were first labelled with cholera toxin B–horseradish peroxi-dase conjugate (CTB–HRP), as described in the Experimental procedures Cells were then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in phos-phate-buffered saline (NaCl ⁄ P i ), pH 7.4, permeabilized in 0.1% (v ⁄ v) Triton X-100 and blocked in 5% (w ⁄ v) skim milk Pgp and caveolin-1 (Cav-1) proteins were detected with mouse and rabbit immunoglob-ulin, respectively, and localization was revealed with anti-species immunoglobulin conjugated to either Alexa 488 (green) or Alexa 594

(red) fluorophores CTB–HRP was conjugated to the Alexa 488 fluoro-phore The overlay image was produced by superimposing the image from the green and red channels, using LCS Lite software.

Trang 7

showed intracellular and perinuclear staining When an

overlay image from the two proteins was produced, no

association between Pgp and caveolin-1 was observed,

as indicated by the absence of any yellow colour

(Fig 4I)

Cholesterol distribution in sucrose density

fractions following treatment of CHRB30 cells

with methyl-b-cyclodextrin

Cholesterol is a component of classical lipid rafts that

is proposed to be required for their structural integrity

The removal of cholesterol by various agents often

leads to the disruption of microdomain structures,

which is manifested by detergent extraction of

mole-cules residing there or by altered activity of signalling

components We have demonstrated previously that

Pgp is localized in intermediate-density membrane

microdomains, which are distinct from classical lipid

rafts and caveolar rafts Our next step was to examine

whether cholesterol plays a role in the formation and

stabilization of these domains One commonly used

agent for the depletion of cholesterol is

methyl-b-cyclo-dextrin (MbCD) We tested various concentrations of

MbCD (5–50 mm) with CHRB30 cells, and found that

treatment with 20 mm MbCD for up to 1 h produced

the maximal cholesterol depletion while still preserving

cell viability (G Radeva & S J Sharom, unpublished

data)

We measured the cholesterol content of the density

gradient fractions of extracts from untreated CHRB30

cells and from cells treated with MbCD, and found

that cholesterol was effectively removed from the lipid

raft fractions obtained using both detergents (Fig 5)

In untreated cells, cholesterol displayed a bimodal

dis-tribution profile when the extracts were prepared with

Triton X-100 One peak of cholesterol was seen

around fractions 4–6 and another in fractions 9–13

(Fig 5, bottom) This pattern corresponds to the lipid

raft marker protein distribution for this detergent

(Fig 1A) This cholesterol distribution pattern is also

similar to that reported in our previous study in the

RBL-2H3 cell line [37] When CHRB30 cells were

trea-ted with MbCD and then extractrea-ted with Triton X-100,

the cholesterol content was dramatically reduced in

lipid raft fractions 4–6, and to a lesser extent in

fractions 9–13 When lipid rafts were isolated using

Brij-96, cholesterol partitioned into a single peak

exclusively in fractions 1–5, which falls into the region

where protein markers of classical lipid rafts segregate

(Fig 1A) Upon treatment with MbCD, cholesterol

was significantly depleted from these fractions (Fig 5,

top)

Effect of cholesterol depletion on Pgp, caveolin-1 and GM1distribution in the sucrose density gradient

After we determined that cholesterol was effectively depleted from lipid raft fractions upon treatment with MbCD, we examined whether cholesterol removal had

an effect on the distribution of Pgp, caveolin-1 and

GM1 in the sucrose density gradient We found that Pgp located in the low-density raft fractions 4–6 in untreated cells was shifted slightly towards the high-density fractions when cells were extracted with Triton X-100 (Fig 6A, right panel) In addition, more Pgp appeared in the high-density soluble fractions relative

to those of low density upon cholesterol depletion

Fig 5 Cholesterol distribution in sucrose density fractions follow-ing treatment of CH R B30 cells with methyl-b-cyclodextrin (MbCD).

CH R B30 cells treated with 20 mM MbCD (grey bars) or untreated control cells (black bars) were lysed in either 0.5% (w ⁄ v) Brij-96 or 1% (w ⁄ v) Triton X-100 Post-nuclear cell extracts were then run on sucrose gradients, and the separated gradient fractions were assayed for the distribution of cholesterol as described in the Experimental procedures The cholesterol content is shown for the entire gradient fraction from 1–2 · 10 8 cells lysed in 300 lL of buf-fer, as the mean ± range The results shown in Figs 5 and 6 were obtained using the same set of gradient fractions.

Trang 8

Interestingly, in Brij-96 extracts, there was a significant

shift in the Pgp distribution after cholesterol depletion

Pgp was located primarily in fractions 6–11 following

cholesterol depletion, as compared to fractions 3–10

for the untreated cells (Fig 6A, left panel) This

indi-cates a substantial change in the buoyant density of

the intermediate-density fractions upon cholesterol

depletion GM1 distribution also shifted towards the

higher-density fractions of the gradient after

choles-terol was removed (Fig 6B), for rafts isolated

using Brij-96 However, no Pgp was found in the

high-density fractions, suggesting that these microdomains

retain their structural integrity on cholesterol

deple-tion However, when rafts were extracted with Triton

X-100 following cholesterol removal, GM1 was not

only shifted to slightly higher density in the raft

frac-tions but could also be seen in the high-density soluble

fractions 10–11 (Fig 6B) Caveolin-1 also showed

dif-ferent behaviour in the two detergent extracts The

protein shifted towards the higher-density fractions

upon treatment with MbCD in Brij-96 cell extracts

(Fig 6C, left panel) However, if cholesterol-depleted

cells were extracted with Triton X-100, a large fraction

of the caveolin-1 partitioned into the high-density sol-uble fractions 10–12 (Fig 6C, right panel), while the remaining protein remained localized in fractions 5–7 This behaviour is similar to that seen for GM1 under the same conditions These results suggest that the domains in which GM1 and caveolin-1 are located prior to cholesterol depletion, corresponding to the low density fractions, require cholesterol for their sta-bilization and are disrupted when it is removed

Discussion

The lipid raft hypothesis proposes the existence of discrete microdomains in cellular plasma membranes, which arise from the specific interactions of sphingo-lipids, glycosphingolipids and cholesterol Pgp has recently been proposed to mediate active cholesterol redistribution in the plasma membrane [19] It has also been reported that MDR cells display differential expression and accumulation of glycosphingolipids [12–14] These observations were suggestive of a

speci-fic membrane domain organization for Pgp, prompting

us to examine this issue using techniques commonly

A

B

C

Fig 6 Effect of cholesterol removal on the

distribution of P-glycoprotein (Pgp), GM1

and caveolin-1 in the sucrose density

gradi-ent CHRB30 cells treated with 20 mM

methyl-b-cyclodextrin (MbCD) or untreated

control cells were lysed in either 0.5%

(w ⁄ v) Brij-96 or 1% (w ⁄ v) Triton X-100.

Post-nuclear lysates were fractionated on a

5–30% discontinuous sucrose gradient, and

13 fractions were collected An aliquot from

each fraction was run on SDS ⁄ PAGE, and

the separated proteins were transferred to a

nitrocellulose membrane and analysed for

Pgp (A) and caveolin-1 (C) by western

immunoblot (IB) analysis and enhanced

chemiluminescence (ECL) detection GM1

(B) detection was carried out by dot-blot

analysis The results in Figs 5 and 6 were

obtained using the same set of gradient

fractions Note that these experiments were

carried out under somewhat different

condi-tions from Fig 1; as a result, the distribution

of caveolin-1 in the sucrose gradient is

slightly narrower.

Trang 9

employed to study lipid rafts, namely cold nonionic

detergent extraction and sucrose density centrifugation

We have recently demonstrated that in RBL-2H3 cells,

Brij-96 and Triton X-100 isolate DRM with different

physical and biochemical properties [37] Here we

present evidence that Pgp is localized in

intermediate-density membrane microdomains that are completely

insoluble in Brij-96, but partially soluble in Triton

X-100 Other ABC transporter proteins appear to

reside in Lubrol WX-resistant domains, but not in

Tri-ton X-100-resistant domains [35,41,42] Two yeast

ABC transporters have been reported to be involved in

trafficking cholesterol specifically from lipid raft

micro-domains in the plasma membrane to the endoplasmic

reticulum, thus facilitating exogenous sterol uptake

into the cell [43]

We used Yes kinase as a marker for classical lipid

rafts and found that Pgp does not segregate with this

protein upon extraction with Brij-96 Thus, the

inter-mediate-density domains containing Pgp generated

using Brij-96 are distinct from classical lipid rafts

There have been other reports of the existence of

non-classical rafts For example, hepatitis C core protein

was associated with DRM that did not colocalize with

GM1 or caveolin-1, and Drobnik et al found that the

GPI-anchored molecules CD14 and CD55 did not

colocalize with ABCA1 after isolation of Lubrol rafts

[41] In polarized HepG2 cells, Lubrol WX-insoluble

and Triton X-100-insoluble domains with differing

properties were functionally linked to distinct

traffick-ing pathways in the apical targettraffick-ing of proteins [42]

Lubrol WX-based rafts were also described where

var-ious ABC proteins were entirely recovered in the

Lubrol-insoluble fractions and only partially (or not at

all) in the Triton X-100-insoluble fractions [35,41,42]

These observations are consistent with our findings

that Pgp extracted from CHRB30 cells is partially

solu-bilized by Triton X-100 but is completely resistant to

Brij-96 solubilization We previously showed that the

degree of enrichment of microdomain constituents in

various regions of the density gradient depends on the

ratio of cell number to detergent [37] The observed

differences in microdomain localization of ABC

pro-teins might therefore reflect variations in the amount

of cellular starting material relative to detergent

Indeed, we found it necessary to double the

cell : detergent ratio when using CHRB30 cells,

com-pared to RBL-2H3 cells, in order to detect the protein

constituents of lipid rafts in the sucrose gradient

frac-tions

Proteins that partition into lipid rafts are generally

those with lipid modifications, such as GPI-anchored

proteins, or acylated proteins that are members of the

Src tyrosine kinase family, while many integral mem-brane proteins appear to be excluded Recent data, including the present work, points out that multispan-ning proteins of the ABC transporter superfamily may display lipid raft domain localization [35,41,42] Cyc-lic-nucleotide-gated channels also appear to be targeted

to lipid rafts [44] It is conceivable that some proteins with transport functions may be organized into mem-brane microdomains, probably together with regula-tory molecules, thus providing an additional level of control over the entry and exit of their substrates One of the apparent differences between the Brij-96 and Triton X-100-insoluble microdomains in CHRB30 cells is their buoyant density, which is determined by lipid composition and protein content Cholesterol

is often required for maintaining lipid rafts but may also modulate Pgp catalytic and transport activity [19,21,36] We found that the Brij-96-insoluble mem-branes contain most of the cellular cholesterol, while the Triton X-100-insoluble domains comprise only a fraction of total cholesterol, the remainder of which is located in the high-density soluble fractions However,

in RBL-2H3 cells, most of the cholesterol in Triton X-100 extracts was detected in the low-density frac-tions [37], indicating that cell-specific differences exist

in raft microdomain detergent solubility Drobnik

et al also detected a lower percentage of cellular cho-lesterol in the low-density fractions of Triton X-100 lysates, as compared to high-density fractions, in human skin fibroblasts but not in monocytes [41] Their data corroborate our current findings and sug-gest that the ratio of cholesterol in the low-density vs high-density fractions in Triton X-100 extracts is a cell type-specific phenomenon

Upon depletion of cellular cholesterol by MbCD treatment, the Pgp-containing intermediate-density domains isolated using Brij-96 showed a shift to higher buoyant densities However, the domains retained their structural integrity as no Pgp was solubilized into the high-density fractions Cholesterol may not be neces-sary for the maintenance of some types of membrane microdomains, for example those containing K-ras [45] and galectin-4 [46] In contrast, the Pgp-containing Tri-ton X-100 microdomains remaining after cholesterol depletion showed only a small shift in buoyant density However, a significant fraction of these domains appeared to have been disrupted, so that more Pgp appeared in the soluble high-density fractions, indica-ting a strong cholesterol requirement for maintenance

of their integrity This finding also suggests that the reason only a fraction of the cellular Pgp is observed

in the Triton X-100-insoluble fractions may be that cholesterol is removed from these domains upon

Trang 10

detergent treatment Indeed, a larger proportion of

cel-lular cholesterol is seen in the high-density fractions of

Triton X-100 extracts, in contrast to Brij-96 extracts

Interestingly, the effect of cholesterol removal on GM1

and caveolin-1 distribution was far more profound in

the Triton X-100 rafts than in the Brij-96 rafts The

GM1- and caveolin-1-containing domains not only

showed a shift to higher density, but significant

amounts of GM1 and caveolin-1 were also detected in

fractions 10–12, indicating that cholesterol depletion

leads to their solubilization GM1 and caveolin-1 do

not behave identically to Pgp, probably because the

critical level of cholesterol required to maintain their

raft association is different, so their sensitivity to

cho-lesterol depletion varies

Possible associations between Pgp, GM1 and

caveo-lin-1 were investigated by confocal fluorescence

micros-copy Clear colocalization was seen between caveolin-1

and GM1, consistent with fact that caveolar fractions

are enriched in GM1[39] However, we did not observe

colocalization between Pgp and caveolin-1, or Pgp and

GM1 Our findings agree with those of Hinrichs et al

who reported that the ABC transporter MRP1 does

not colocalize with caveolin-1 and is enriched in

non-caveolar detergent-insoluble domains [35] However,

Demeule et al reported coimmunoprecipitation of Pgp

and caveolin-1 in CHRC5 cells and brain endothelial

cells [33,34] We were unable to see any interaction

between Pgp and caveolin-1 by coimmunoprecipitation

under conditions where the raft vesicles are solubilized

by detergent It is therefore possible that Pgp and

cave-olin-1 are localized in neighbouring raft domains at the

plasma membrane and copartition into the same DRM

after detergent extraction, but there is no direct, strong

association between them Alternatively, preservation

of their interaction is highly dependent on the ratio of

cell lipid⁄ protein : detergent employed during

extrac-tion The association between Pgp and caveolin-1 may

be cell type-specific, but the CHRB30 cell line used in

this study was derived from CHRC5, so this seems

unlikely

Lipid raft microdomains are proposed to exist in the

more highly ordered lo phase, compared to the bulk

membrane lipids, which are in the liquid-disordered ld

phase Work with the fluorescent probe, merocyanine

540, showed that increasing Pgp expression in MDR

cells correlated with an increase in the packing density

of the plasma membrane outer leaflet, relative to that of

the drug-sensitive parent [47], perhaps reflecting larger

numbers of raft microdomains containing Pgp Unlike

many membrane transporters, which often cease to

function in rigid gel phase bilayers, the rate of

Pgp-mediated drug transport remained high in the gel phase

[26], suggesting that ordered microdomains may be help-ful to the function of the protein Pgp-mediated ATP hydrolysis was also efficient in the gel phase, with a lower activation energy, Eact, than in the liquid-crystal-line phase [17] The intermediate density microdomains

in which Pgp is located may therefore provide a suitable environment for the protein to function optimally

Experimental procedures

Materials The anti-Pgp monoclonal antibody, C219, was supplied by

ID Laboratories (London, ON, Canada) Anti-Lyn, anti-Yes, anti-Lck, anti-caveolin-1 and anti-CD71 (transferrin receptor) mouse monoclonal antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) CTB–HRP, MbCD, Protein A–agarose, Protein G–agarose, phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, Nonidet P-40, DNase, pepstatin A, n-octylglucoside and leupeptin were purchased

HRP-labelled goat anti-rabbit and goat anti-mouse immu-noglobulin were purchased from Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories (Mississauga, ON, Canada) Triton X-100 was supplied by Roche Diagnostics (Laval, QC, Canada),

Brij-96 was obtained from Fluka (Oakville, ON, Canada), and SDS was purchased from Fisher Scientific (Whitby, ON, Canada)

Cells The highly MDR Chinese hamster ovary cell line, CHRB30, and a glycosylation deficient lectin-resistant variant,

CHRPHAR, were as described previously [48] Cells were grown as monolayers in a-minimal essential medium (a-MEM) containing 10% (v⁄ v) fetal bovine serum (Hy-clone, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 2 mm glutamine and 2 mm penicillin⁄ streptomycin, at 37 C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% (v⁄ v) CO2in the presence of 30 lgÆmL)1 colchicine Typically, cells were harvested using 0.25% (w⁄ v) trypsin or 5 mm EDTA in phosphate-buffered saline (NaCl⁄ Pi, pH 7.4) The RBL-2H3 cell line was cultured as described previously [37] Jurkat cells were grown using the same culture medium and conditions as CHRB30 cells

Isolation of lipid raft microdomains using sucrose gradient centrifugation

Lipid rafts were isolated from either freshly harvested or frozen cells, using Triton X-100 or Brij-96, as described pre-viously for RBL-2H3 cells [37] About 5–10· 108 cells (200–250 lL cell pellet) were washed twice in NaCl⁄ Pi,

pH 7.4 or Tris-buffered saline (TBS; 25 mm Tris⁄ HCl,

140 mm NaCl, pH 7.5) and then treated on ice with 1 mL

Ngày đăng: 16/03/2014, 23:20

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm