1. Trang chủ
  2. » Luận Văn - Báo Cáo

Báo cáo khoa học: Roles of base excision repair subpathways in correcting oxidized abasic sites in DNA pptx

10 357 0
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 10
Dung lượng 226,67 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

As the major repair mode for regular AP sites, the short-patch BER pathway removes the incised AP lesion, a 5¢-deoxyribose-5-phosphate moi-ety, and replaces a single nucleotide using DNA

Trang 1

Roles of base excision repair subpathways in correcting oxidized abasic sites in DNA

Jung-Suk Sung1and Bruce Demple2

1 Department of Life Science, Dongguk University, Seoul, South Korea

2 Department of Genetics and Complex Diseases, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

Genetic stability is threatened by the continuous

assault on cellular DNA by various reactive species of

both endogenous and exogenous origins The most

common types of DNA damage are associated with

DNA base alteration A well-characterized DNA base

modification is uracil, which can arise in genomic

DNA by misincorporation of dUMP during DNA

syn-thesis, or by the spontaneous deamination of cytosine

in G : C base pairs to form a premutagenic lesion

[1,2] Reactive oxygen species, the products of normal

cellular respiration, also generate a variety of oxidized DNA base damages, including an 8-oxoguanine that is frequently used as a biomarker for oxidative DNA damage [3,4] Enzymatic methylation of DNA bases, predominantly cytosines, plays an important role in gene regulation, but nonenzymatic alkylation from endogenous sources forms cytotoxic and mutagenic products, such as 3-alkyladenine and O6-alkylguanine [5,6] Metabolic by-products (such as epoxyaldehydes), produced during cellular lipid peroxidation, are

Keywords

2-deoxyribonolactone; DNA polymerase

beta; DNA–protein crosslinks; FEN1 protein;

long-patch BER; oxidized abasic sites;

short-patch BER

Correspondence

B Demple, Department of Genetics and

Complex Diseases, Harvard School of Public

Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA

Fax: +1 617 432 0377

Tel: +1 617 432 3462

E-mail: bdemple@hsph.harvard.edu

(Received 12 December 2005, accepted

6 February 2006)

doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05192.x

Base excision DNA repair (BER) is fundamentally important in handling diverse lesions produced as a result of the intrinsic instability of DNA or

by various endogenous and exogenous reactive species Defects in the BER process have been associated with cancer susceptibility and neurodegenera-tive disorders BER funnels diverse base lesions into a common intermedi-ate, apurinic⁄ apyrimidinic (AP) sites The repair of AP sites is initiated by the major human AP endonuclease, Ape1, or by AP lyase activities associ-ated with some DNA glycosylases Subsequent steps follow either of two distinct BER subpathways distinguished by repair DNA synthesis of either

a single nucleotide (short-patch BER) or multiple nucleotides (long-patch BER) As the major repair mode for regular AP sites, the short-patch BER pathway removes the incised AP lesion, a 5¢-deoxyribose-5-phosphate moi-ety, and replaces a single nucleotide using DNA polymerase (Polb) How-ever, short-patch BER may have difficulty handling some types of lesions,

as shown for the C1¢-oxidized abasic residue, 2-deoxyribonolactone (dL) Recent work indicates that dL is processed efficiently by Ape1, but that short-patch BER is derailed by the formation of stable covalent crosslinks between Ape1-incised dL and Polb The long-patch BER subpathway effectively removes dL and thereby prevents the formation of DNA–protein crosslinks In coping with dL, the cellular choice of BER subpathway may either completely repair the lesion, or complicate the repair process by forming a protein–DNA crosslink

Abbreviations

AP, apurinic ⁄ apyrimidinic; BER, base excision DNA repair; DPC, DNA–protein crosslink; dL, 2-deoxyribonolactone; 5¢-dLp, 5¢-terminal dL-5-phosphate residues; 5¢-dRp, 5¢-deoxyribose-5-dL-5-phosphate; MEF, mouse embryonic fibroblasts; 5-MF, 5-methylene-2-furanone; PARP-1, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen; Polb, DNA polymerase b.

Trang 2

reactive to DNA and give rise to covalently modified

etheno-adducts involving all four DNA bases [7]

Although the reported endogenous levels of each type

of base lesion vary among tissues and with the method

of detection, their mutagenic and cytotoxic potential

suggests that they must be considered as factors in the

induction of cancer and other diseases Beyond this

endogenous burden of DNA damage, exposure of cells

to exogenous reactive chemical agents, derived from

environmental sources or delivered deliberately as

che-motherapeutic drugs, may directly produce further

DNA damage or modulate cellular conditions to

increase the level of damage indirectly (e.g by

disrupt-ing mitochondrial function)

Perhaps the most important cellular defense

mechan-ism that evolved to avert the deleterious effects of the

most frequent damaged or inappropriate bases in

DNA is base excision DNA repair (BER) [8–10] The

initial step of BER involves enzymatic activities that

process the N-glycosylic bonds linking the target bases

and their deoxyribose sugars The first such enzyme

discovered was bacterial uracil-DNA glycosylase [11]

Subsequently, uracil-DNA glycosylases were found to

be widely distributed, and DNA glycosylases acting on

other diverse lesions (alkylated, oxidized, or

photo-damaged bases, as well as certain unphoto-damaged but

mispaired bases) have been found and characterized

for their biochemical properties and biological roles in

BER : mammalian cells contain at least 10 distinct

gly-cosylase activities [12,13] The initial product of a

DNA glycosylase is an abasic [apurinic⁄ apyrimidinic

(AP)] site in DNA, which is the central intermediate

during BER AP sites can also arise spontaneously at

a substantial rate and are expected to be one of the

most frequent lesions in DNA (Fig 1A) It has been

estimated that AP site formation through the

sponta-neous hydrolytic loss of purines generates some 10 000

AP sites per day in a mammalian cell [14,15]

Com-bined with the AP sites produced by DNA

glycosylas-es, the daily burden of AP sites is probably much

higher One estimate yielded steady-state levels of

50 000–200 000 AP sites per cell in various rat tissues

and human liver [16], although that seems likely to be

an overestimate [12] AP sites are dangerous lesions

that block normal DNA replication, with cytotoxic

and mutagenic consequences [17]

Oxidative damage to DNA, mediated by free

radi-cals and reactive oxygen species, produces structurally

distinct abasic sites, known as oxidized abasic sites

Oxidized abasic sites include lesions at DNA strand

breaks, such as 3¢-phosphoglycolate esters and abasic

residues in an uninterrupted phosphodiester backbone

These types of DNA lesions are formed by the action

of various physical and chemical agents, including

UV and c-irradiation, heterocyclic N-oxides of the tirapazamine family, organometallic oxidants and the anticancer antibiotics (such as neocarzinostatin) of the ene-diyne family [18–21] The formation of oxid-ized AP sites is initiated by the reaction of free radicals with the deoxyribose sugar components of DNA and subsequent chemical rearrangements that are modula-ted by the presence of molecular oxygen [22,23] The earliest identified X-ray damage in DNA was a C1¢-oxidized abasic lesion, 2-deoxyribonolactone (dL) [24], which is generated by initial hydrogen abstraction from the deoxyribose C1¢ carbon, followed by O2 addi-tion and base loss (Fig 1B) Successive b- and d-elimi-nations of dL residues yields a strand break with 3¢- and 5¢-phosphate ends and liberates 5-methylene-2-furanone (5-MF) (Fig 1B) 5-MF has been employed

as a characteristic product of dL in its detection in DNA [25,26] As determined by comparing the release

of 5-MF with concomitant DNA breakage, dL lesions may account for up to 72% of the total sugar damage

in the irradiated DNA in vitro [25] Comparison of the rate of spontaneous strand scission at dL sites to the regular (aldehyde) AP sites shows that cleavage at dL sites is 12- to 55-fold faster than at AP sites [27] How-ever, the immediate breakage of DNA at the dL lesion would not be expected under physiological conditions

OPO3

OH

AP site

Spontaneous Base Loss Removal of Bases

by DNA Glycosylases

OPO3

OPO3

A

O

2-Deoxyribonolactone

O

OPO3

OPO3

OPO3

5-methylene-2-furanone

N

B

Fig 1 Abasic DNA damage Formation of a regular abasic apurinic ⁄ apyrimidinic (AP) site (A) and an oxidized abasic site, 2-deoxyribono-lactone (dL) (B).

Trang 3

The half-life of dL for spontaneous cleavage under

simulated physiological conditions was estimated to be

32–54 h in duplex DNA [28] Recent understandings

of the chemical properties of dL indicates that these

lesions are probably subjected to cellular DNA repair

or translesion DNA synthesis, rather than directly

con-tributing to the formation of DNA strand scission

Short- and long-patch BER in

mammalian cells

A simplified version of BER for AP sites can be

des-cribed as follows: (a) enzymatic incision of the AP site;

(b) excision of the cleaved AP site at the single-strand

break; (c) repair DNA synthesis; (d) ligation of the

nick in DNA In mammalian cells, the major AP

endo-nuclease, Ape1 (also called Apex, HAP1, or Ref-1),

hydrolyzes the 5¢ phosphodiester bond of the AP site

to generate a DNA repair intermediate that contains a

single strand break with 3¢-hydroxyl and

5¢-deoxy-ribose-5-phosphate (5¢-dRp) termini [29,30] Further

repair is achieved through at least two distinct BER

subpathways that involve different subsets of enzymes,

and which result in the replacement of one nucleotide

(short-patch BER), or two or more nucleotides

(long-patch BER) (Fig 2)

In mammalian short-patch BER, the major 5¢-dRp excision is attributable to DNA polymerase b (Polb) The dRp excision involves a lyase activity in the Polb

8 kDa N-terminal domain acting through a covalent, Schiff base intermediate [31,32] (Fig 3A) Single-nucleotide gap-filling DNA synthesis is associated with the DNA polymerase activity of Polb, which therefore plays dual roles in short-patch BER In an earlier study, the simplest form of short-patch BER of uracil was reconstituted in vitro by using purified human pro-teins, including Ung, Ape1, Polb and DNA ligase III [33] Similar in vitro reconstitution experiments for the repair of other base lesions or the AP site also sugges-ted essential roles of Polb in the short-patch BER pathway [34–36] Involvement of Polb in the short-patch BER of various types of DNA lesions has been demonstrated by using cell extracts from wild-type and Polb null mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) cells [37–40] Some short-patch BER is still observed with Polb-deficient cell extracts, however, which suggests

5'-P

3'-blocking

group

3'-OH 5'-dRP

3'-OH 5'-P

3'-OH 5'-P

3'-OH 5'-P

FEN1-PCNA

Polβ

and/or Pol δ/ε-PCNA

Base damage

AP site

Monofunctional DNA glycosylase Bifunctional

DNA glycosylase

Ape1 Ape1 / PNK

Polβ

Polβ

LIG1 LIGIII-XRCC1 (1 nt patch) ( ≥2 nt patch)

Fig 2 Short- and long-patch base excision DNA repair (BER)

path-ways The steps involved in both pathways are discussed in the

text.

O

OPO3

OPO3

2-OH

H 2 N

OH

OPO3

H

HN

+

β-elimination

A

K72

5'-dRP lyase

K72

Polβ

OPO3

2-OPO3

2-Polβ

O

OPO3

OPO3

O HN B

H 2 N K72

K72

OPO32- OPO3

2-O

OPO3

O

H 2 N

OH

OPO3

O HN

AP Lyase

C

OPO3

2-OPO3

5'-dRP lyase

Fig 3 Excision of an abasic apurinic ⁄ apyrimidinic (AP) site and formation of a 2-deoxyribonolactone (dL)-mediated DNA–protein crosslink (A) Repair of a 5¢ incised AP site, a 5¢-deoxyribose-5-phos-phate residue (5¢-dRp) by the dRp lyase activity of DNA polymerase

b (Polb) (B) Covalent trapping of Polb by a 5¢ incised dL residue through the dRp lyase active site of the enzyme (C) Covalent trap-ping of a glycosylase-AP lyase by an uncleaved dL residue.

Trang 4

that there is functional redundancy at the level of

DNA polymerases to provide cells with backup

sys-tems [41–43] Despite this possibility, Polb is encoded

by an essential gene, the deletion of which causes

embryonic lethality in mice [44] Polb-deficient MEFs

exhibit hypersensitivity to DNA alkylating agents that

require BER [44] Somewhat surprisingly, near-normal

resistance could be restored in MEFs by providing

only the N-terminal dRp lyase domain of Polb [45],

which suggests greater functional redundancy for BER

repair polymerase activities than for dRp excision

The long-patch BER pathway involves strand

dis-placement repair synthesis of at least two nucleotides,

with excision of the 5¢-dRp residue as part of a flap

oligonucleotide cleaved by the FEN1 nuclease [34,46]

The identity of the polymerases involved in the

long-patch BER pathway is not yet fully understood It has

been suggested that Polb may be responsible for the

initiation of strand displacement synthesis [40,47] In

addition, the involvement of other DNA polymerases,

such as Pold and Pole, in long-patch BER has been

suggested [43,48,49] A reconstituted enzyme system

was developed for long-patch BER of a reduced AP

site utilizing purified Ape1, Polb, Pold, proliferating

cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), FEN1 and DNA ligase I,

where Pold substituted for Polb when PCNA was

pre-sent in the reaction [34] PCNA-dependent long-patch

BER was also demonstrated in extracts of

Polb-defici-ent MEF cells, but it appeared to be heavily dependPolb-defici-ent

on the use of circular DNA substrates [38,41] During

the PCNA-independent long-patch BER mode, Polb

may be the major DNA polymerase in strand

displace-ment DNA synthesis [40] However, comparative

ana-lysis of BER in wild-type and Polb null cell extracts

showed the occurrence of long-patch BER, even in the

absence of Polb, suggesting that various DNA

poly-merases provide functional redundancy in long-patch

BER DNA synthesis [38,41]

Various interactions among BER proteins may alter

the choice of BER subpathways Ape1, when bound to

DNA, interacts with Polb, which also physically

inter-acts with the scaffold protein, XRCC1 [33,50,51]

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP-1), the

enzyme that immediately binds to the incised AP site

and undergoes self-ADP-ribosylation, interacts with

XRCC1 and Polb and affects BER [51,52] The

involvement of PARP-1 can increase the overall BER

rate, especially by enhancing short-patch BER, by

ant-agonizing the action of Polb, producing a complete

block of long patch BER strand-displacement DNA

synthesis [53] Long-patch BER reactions are also

well co-ordinated through protein–protein interactions

between PCNA and various BER enzymes, including

Polb, Pold⁄ e, FEN1 and DNA ligase I [9,54–56] When such interactions are disrupted by p21-derived peptide that binds specifically to PCNA, the mode of AP site repair was skewed towards short-patch BER, but only

in the presence of Polb [41,57] Recently, adenomatous polyposis coli, the tumor suppressor protein, has been implicated in preventing Polb-mediated strand dis-placement synthesis by masking the domain of Polb that interacts with PCNA, thereby decreasing long-patch BER, but not short-long-patch BER [58]

An additional variation of BER has been suggested,

as some bifunctional DNA glycosylases are associated with AP lyase activity that can carry out the cleavage

of AP sites by b-elimination These reactions generate 3¢ termini that are blocked by the lyase product, which must be removed by an enzyme, such as Ape1,

to allow repair DNA synthesis (Fig 2) In this path-way, the 3¢ repair diesterase activity of Ape1 plays an important role [59], as it also does in the excision of 3¢ phosphoglycolate esters generated by ionizing radiation

or chemical oxidation [29,60] More recently, human polynucleotide kinase has been implicated in the repair

of 3¢ phosphate damage, and its interaction with other BER proteins, including XRCC1, Polb and DNA ligase III, has been shown [61]

In general, long-patch BER has been considered to

be a minor pathway relative to the predominant short-patch BER However, several in vitro and in vivo stud-ies suggest a significant contribution of the long-patch BER mode in some circumstances, particularly in the repair of regular AP sites or of the damaged base lesions that become AP sites by the action of mono-functional DNA glycosylases [39,41,62,63] As meas-ured by an in vivo assay using a plasmid containing a single AP site in the stop codon of the gene encoding enhanced green fluorescent protein, > 80% of the repair accompanying the reversion of the stop codon occurred by long-patch BER [63] This result is consis-tent with a previous observation that 70–80% of uracil-initiated BER was mediated by long-patch BER, when examined by utilizing a circular DNA substrate and cell-free extracts of MEF cells [41]

The detailed mechanism that governs the selection between the short- or long-patch BER modes remains

a major unknown Previously, it has been suggested that it is the nature of the DNA lesion that determines the type of DNA glycosylase (monofunctional versus glycosylase lyase), which, in turn, determines the selection of the repair pathway [39] BER, initiated by bifunctional DNA glycosylases with associated AP lyase activity, is mainly mediated by the short-patch pathway because the resulting BER intermediate, containing a single nucleotide gap bracketed by a

Trang 5

3¢-hydroxyl and a 5¢-phosphate, can be readily filled in

by Polb In contrast, DNA repair, involving a

mono-functional DNA glycosylase that generates an AP site,

may involve both the short- and long-patch BER

path-ways In this model, the removal of 5¢-dRp, which

appears to be the late-limiting step in short-patch BER

[64], may be critical in determining the mode of BER

DNA–protein crosslink formation

in the short-patch BER of dL

Chemical methods for the specific generation of dL

lesions within DNA oligonucleotides have been

inde-pendently developed by several laboratories [65–67]

All of these methods involve the photolysis of a stable

precursor and its conversion to dL at a defined site in

synthetic DNA oligonucleotides These approaches

facilitated the study of the biological fate of this key

oxidative deoxyribose damage in DNA Initial

investi-gation of dL repair by Escherichia coli endonuclease

III, a bifunctional DNA glycosylase associated with

AP lyase activity, revealed the formation of a

sta-ble DNA–protein crosslink (DPC) with dL, which was

dependent on the lyase active-site lysine residue

involved in b-elimination [19] Bifunctional DNA

gly-cosylase⁄ AP lyase enzymes (hOGG1 and hNth1) found

in human cells, can also crosslink to dL [68] On the

other hand, the E coli AP endonucleases exonuclease

III and endonuclease IV can efficiently incise dL

resi-dues [68,69] Consistent with these observations, the

dL-induced mutation frequency measured in vivo was

32-fold elevated in AP endonuclease-deficient E coli

compared with wild-type bacteria [70]

Human Ape1 protein also incises dL residues rather

efficiently, with a turnover rate (2.3 s)1) essentially

identical to that of regular AP sites (2.4 s)1), and only

a modest Km difference (98 nm for dL versus 21 nm

for AP) [69] Considering the abundance of Ape1 in

most mammalian cell types, the most probable fate of

dL residues in vivo would be cleavage on the 5¢ side to

yield strand breaks with 5¢-terminal dL-5-phosphate

residues (5¢-dLp) The equivalent 5¢-dRp residue is

effectively processed by the dRp lyase activity of Polb

during short-patch BER However, reactions of

puri-fied Polb with DNA oligonucleotide substrates

con-taining Ape1-cleaved 5¢-dLp residues led to the

spontaneous formation of covalent crosslinks between

the DNA and the polymerase [71] The formation of

such DPCs was shown to be dependent on the dRp

lyase active site Lys72 of Polb [71], suggesting that the

respective lysine side chains are involved in

nucleophi-lic attack on the carbonyl carbon of dL, resulting in

the formation of a stable amide bond (Fig 3B) It has

been shown that bacterial nucleotide excision repair can incise DNA containing an AP lyase (or peptide) covalently cross-linked by chemical reduction in an unbroken DNA [72,73] Unlike the dL-mediated DPC formed with an AP lyase on an unbroken DNA, the DPC formation by Polb trapping to dL occurs at the DNA strand break generated by Ape1 (compare Fig 3B with Fig 3C) Whether a DPC located at a DNA strand break can be handled by nucleotide exci-sion repair remains to be addressed

In an effort to determine the biological significance

of such crosslink formation, a cell-free extract system was utilized to react with oligonucleotide DNA con-taining a site-specific dL residue [57] Under nonrepair conditions (no added dNTPs or Mg2+), the most pre-dominant DPC species was found to contain Polb, because this species was not observed in the reactions with extracts of Polb null mouse cells As the dRp lyase activity of Polb constitutes the major activity for removing 5¢-dRp residues in mammalian cells [32,44], the results indicate that DPC formation, specific to the 5¢-dLp lesion, occurs mainly through the abortive attempt of the dRp lyase activity of Polb to remove this incised dL lesion Polb displays strong affinity for 5¢-dRp residues at the incised AP site, while Ape1 recruits Polb to the incised AP site and stimulates its dRp lyase activity [50,74] Thus, this enzyme–substrate specificity may promote the interaction of Polb with a 5¢-dLp lesion at a DNA nick, thereby increasing the rate of Polb-specific DPC formation On the other hand, it has been recently verified that dRp lyase activ-ity lags behind the polymerase activactiv-ity in the dual functions of Polb, while Ape1 suppresses the poly-merase activity [75] In this scenario, Ape1 may modu-late Polb to pause prior to acting at the 5¢-dLp, possibly suppressing an abortive attempt to excise the lesion Whether interactions between Ape1 and Polb,

or the involvement of other factors, stimulates or inhibits the covalent trapping of Polb to the 5¢-dLp residue, must await further analysis

Use of long-patch BER in the repair

of dL The major difference found in the sequential enzymatic steps between short-patch and long-patch BER is the removal of the incised abasic residue (5¢-dRp) While the dRp lyase activity of Polb participates in the processing of this residue, an attempt to remove the 5¢-dLp residue by Polb using the same mechanism results in trapping of the repair enzyme at the lesion

In the alternative long-patch BER pathway, removal

of the 5¢-dRp moiety is independent of the Polb dRp

Trang 6

lyase activity and is mediated mainly by strand

dis-placement DNA synthesis followed by FEN-1 excision

Therefore, it is not unreasonable to expect that the

Ape1-incised dL residue may be repaired by the

long-patch BER pathway

Reconstitution of dL-mediated BER conducted with

partial components of long-patch BER, including

Ape1, Polb and FEN-1, revealed that the formation of

dL-mediated DPC was dependent on both Ape1 (for

cleavage) and Polb, but that the amount of this DPC

product was markedly decreased in reactions including

FEN-1 and dNTPs (Fig 4A) Repair DNA synthesis,

displacing the 5¢-dLp residue by Polb alone, did not

block the DPC formation, indicating that removal of

dL-containing DNA fragment by FEN1 plays a key

role in preventing crosslinking with the DNA substrate

(Fig 4B) This result suggests that sequential enzymatic

activities in long-patch BER can effectively process the lesion and avoid dL-mediated DPC formation This hypothesis was further supported by the demonstration

of efficient processing of a 5¢-dLp flap oligonucleotide

by FEN-1 [57], consistent with previous observations showing that the enzyme tolerates a variety of small modifications of the flap 5¢ terminus [76] Investigation

of dL-mediated long-patch BER was performed by util-izing circular DNA with a defined dL residue, incuba-ted with whole-cell extracts [57] The repair of dL was detected in both wild-type and Polb-null MEF cell extracts, with concomitant reduction of subsequent crosslinking activity Analysis of the patch size distribu-tion associated with BER of site-specific lesions showed that the single-nucleotide replacement was the predom-inant repair patch (35% of the total) for a regular AP site in the Polb-proficient cell extract, but this event

A

B

X=dL

*= 32 P

dL

β

1

2

3

4

C

*

*

*

*

*

Fig 4 In vitro reconstituted long-patch base excision DNA repair (BER) mediates the repair of 2-deoxyribonolactone (dL) and inhibits the formation of a dL-mediated DNA–protein crosslink (DPC) (A) A duplex 3¢ 32 P-labeled DNA substrate, containing a site-specific dL, was incu-bated with different combinations of Ape1, DNA polymerase b (Polb) and FEN1 in the presence or absence of a dNTP mix excluding dTTP After the incubation, one-half of each reaction mixture was analyzed on a DNA sequencing gel Ape1 converted the majority of the DNA sub-strate to the DNA cleavage product, while additional treatments with Polb and FEN1 mediated further processing of the DNA only in the presence of dNTPs The generation of the 11-mer is consistent with strand displacement DNA synthesis of seven nucleotides by the poly-merase, followed by removal of the displaced DNA flap by FEN1 (B) The remainder of each reaction mixture was analyzed by SDS ⁄ PAGE The dL-mediated DPCs with Polb are observed with mobilities slower than those of Polb and the free DNA The generation of DPC was markedly reduced when the reaction allowed the combined action of repair synthesis by Polb and flap excision by FEN1 (C) Schemes for the Ape1 incision of DNA at the 5¢ side of the dL lesion (1), the strand displacement DNA synthesis of seven nucleotides by the DNA poly-merase activity of Polb (2), removal of the 5¢-dLp-containing flap by FEN1, resulting in a nick on DNA (3), and DPC formation via an abortive attempt to remove the 5¢-dLp residue by the dRp lyase activity of Polb (4) The combined processes of (2) and (3) mediate removal of the dL-containing oligonucleotide fragment from the DNA substrate and prevent DPC formation with Polb (4) Adapted from a previous publicat-ion [57].

Trang 7

was significantly reduced (< 10% of the total) for

repair of the dL substrate Instead, repair patches of

two or more nucleotides were the predominant mode

for dL with both Polb-proficient and -deficient cell

extracts It was also confirmed that only the long-patch

BER mode was mostly associated with the complete

repair process, including the final DNA ligation step

[57] Therefore, at least in mammalian cell extracts, dL

appears to be resistant to repair by short-patch BER,

but effectively and exclusively repaired by long-patch

BER, thereby preventing the formation of deleterious

DPC adducts in DNA

Concluding remarks

In spite of numerous efforts in defining the biological

and biochemical mechanisms involved in BER, the

cel-lular choice of the specific BER mode remains an

intriguing question A similar diversity in BER modes

is also found in E coli [77–79], which indicates that

multiple subpathways of BER are favored by evolution

for defending against various types of nonbulky

dam-age lesions in the genetic material Our studies of

dL-mediated BER provide at least one clear rationale

for the evolution of long-patch BER to handle a

naturally occurring lesion While dL residues present

serious problems for cells by mediating stable DPC

formation with Polb, particularly in the course of the

short-patch BER pathway, it appears that the

operat-ion of the long-patch BER pathway substantially

avoids this detrimental consequence However, under

conditions of extensive oxidative stress, it seems

poss-ible that long-patch BER components may become

limiting because of their participation in the repair of

many other lesions, with the attendant hazards if

short-patch BER increasingly attempts to handle dL

lesions On the other hand, the induction of proteins

that could modulate the subpathways of BER, as

shown with p21, may alter the outcome of BER

oper-ating on dL [57] In such circumstances, Ape1-incised

dL residues could remain in the DNA for longer

peri-ods, increasing the opportunity for DPC formation

Further studies of dL will provide more understanding

the BER switching mechanism that governs the

short-versus long-patch BER distribution under varying

circumstances of damage load and repair enzyme

avail-ability

Acknowledgements

Work in B Demple’s laboratory was supported by

NIH grants GM40000 and CA71993 J S Sung was

partly supported by Dongguk University Research

Fund We are grateful to our colleagues, especially Dr

M S DeMott, for helpful discussions

References

1 Duncan BK & Miller JH (1980) Mutagenic deamination

of cytosine residues in DNA Nature 278, 560–561

2 Mosbaugh DW & Bennett SE (1994) Uracil-excision DNA repair Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 48, 315– 370

3 Escodd (European Standards Committee on Oxidative DNA Damage) (2003) Measurement of DNA oxidation

in human cells by chromatographic and enzymic meth-ods Free Radic Biol Med 34, 1089–1099

4 Escodd (European Standards Committee on Oxidative DNA Damage) (2002) Comparative analysis of baseline 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine in mammalian cell DNA, by different methods in different laboratories: an approach

to consensus Carcinogenesis 23, 2129–2133

5 Schmutte C, Yang AS, Nguyen TT, Beart RW & Jones

PA (1996) Mechanisms for the involvement of DNA methylation in colon carcinogenesis Cancer Res 56, 2375–2381

6 Rydberg B & Lindahl T (1982) Nonenzymatic methyla-tion of DNA by the intracellular methyl group donor S-adenosyl-L-methionine is a potentially mutagenic reaction EMBO J 1, 211–216

7 Gros L, Ishchenko AA & Saparbaev M (2003) Enzy-mology of repair of etheno-adducts Mutat Res 531, 219–229

8 Fortini P, Pascucci B, Parlanti E, D’Errico M, Simonelli

V & Dogliotti E (2003) The base excision repair: mechanisms and its relevance for cancer susceptibility Biochimie 85, 1053–1071

9 Fan J, Wilson DM III (2005) Protein–protein interac-tions and posttranslational modificainterac-tions in mammalian base excision repair Free Radic Biol Med 38, 1121– 1138

10 Krokan HE, Nilsen H, Skorpen F, Otterlei M & Slup-phaug G (2000) Base excision repair of DNA in mam-malian cells FEBS Lett 476, 73–77

11 Lindahl T (1974) An N-glycosidase from Escherichia coli that releases free uracil from DNA containing deaminated cytosine residues Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

71, 3283–3286

12 Barnes DE & Lindahl T (2004) Repair and genetic con-sequences of endogenous DNA base damage in mam-malian cells Annu Rev Genet 38, 445–476

13 Krokan HE, Standal R & Slupphaug G (1997) DNA glycosylases in the base excision repair of DNA Bio-chem J 325, 1–16

14 Lindahl T & Andersson A (1972) Rate of chain break-age at apurinic sites in double-stranded deoxyribonu-cleic acid Biochemistry 11, 3618–3623

Trang 8

15 Lindahl T & Nyberg B (1972) Rate of depurination of

native deoxyribonucleic acid Biochemistry 11, 3618–

3623

16 Nakamura J & Swenberg JA (1999) Endogenous

apurinic⁄ apyrimidinic sites in genomic DNA of

mam-malian tissues Cancer Res 59, 2522–2526

17 Loeb LA & Preston BD (1986) Mutagenesis by

apurinic⁄ apyrimidinic sites Annu Rev Genet 20, 201–230

18 Kappen LS & Goldberg IH (1992) Neocarzinostatin

acts as a sensitive probe of DNA microheterogeneity:

switching of chemistry from C-1¢ to C-4¢ by a G : T

mismatch 5¢-to the site of DNA damage Proc Natl

Acad Sci USA 89, 6706–6710

19 Hashimoto M, Greenberg MM, Kow YW, Hwang JT

& Cunningham RP (2001) The 2-deoxyribonolactone

lesion produced in DNA by neocarzinostatin and other

damaging agents forms cross-links with the

base-exci-sion repair enzyme endonuclease III J Am Chem Soc

123, 3161–3162

20 Pratviel G, Pitie M, Bernadou J & Meunier B (1991)

Mechanism of DNA cleavage by cationic manganese

porphyrins: hydroxylations at the 1¢-carbon and

5¢-car-bon atoms of deoxyriboses as initial damages Nucleic

Acids Res 19, 6283–6288

21 Sigman DS, Mazumder A & Perrin DM (1993)

Chemi-cal nucleases Chem Rev 93, 2295–2316

22 Demple B & DeMott MS (2002) Dynamics and

diver-sions in base excision DNA repair of oxidized abasic

lesions Oncogene 21, 8926–8934

23 Dedon PC & Goldberg IH (1992) Free-radical

mechan-isms involved in the formation of sequence-dependent

bistranded DNA lesions by the antitumor antibiotics

bleomycin, neocarzinostatin, and calicheamicin Chem

Res Toxicol 5, 311–332

24 Von Sonntag C (1987) The Chemical Basis of Radiation

Biology Taylor & Francis, London

25 Roginskaya M, Bernhard WA, Marion RT &

Razska-zovskiy Y (2005) The release of 5-methylene-2-furanone

from irradiated DNA catalyzed by cationic polyamines

and divalent metal cations Radiat Res 163, 85–89

26 Goyne TE & Sigman DS (1987) Nuclease activity of

1,10-phenanthroline-copper ion Chemistry of

deoxy-ribose oxidation J Am Chem Soc 109, 2846–2848

27 Roupioz Y, Lhomme J & Kotera M (2002) Chemistry

of the 2-deoxyribonolactone lesion in oligonucleotides:

cleavage kinetics and products analysis J Am Chem Soc

124, 9129–9135

28 Zheng Y & Sheppard TL (2004) Half-life and DNA

strand scission products of 2-deoxyribonolactone

oxida-tive DNA damage lesions Chem Res Toxicol 17, 197–

207

29 Chen DS, Herman T & Demple B (1991) Two distinct

human DNA diesterases that hydrolyze 3¢-blocking

de-oxyribose fragments from oxidized DNA Nucleic Acids

Res 19, 5907–5914

30 Demple B, Herman T & Chen DS (1991) Cloning and expression of APE, the cDNA encoding the major human apurinic endonuclease: definition of a family of DNA repair enzymes Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88, 11450–11454

31 Piersen CE, Prasad R, Wilson SH & Lloyd RS (1996) Evidence for an imino intermediate in the DNA poly-merase beta deoxyribose phosphate excision reaction

J Biol Chem 271, 17811–17815

32 Matsumoto Y & Kim K (1995) Excision of deoxyribose phosphate residues by DNA polymerase beta during DNA repair Science 269, 699–702

33 Kubota Y, Nash RA, Klungland A, Schar P, Barnes

DE & Lindahl T (1996) Reconstitution of DNA base excision-repair with purified human proteins: interaction between DNA polymerase beta and the XRCC1 pro-tein EMBO J 15, 6662–6670

34 Klungland A & Lindahl T (1997) Second pathway for completion of human DNA base excision-repair: recon-stitution with purified proteins and requirement for DNase IV (FEN1) EMBO J 16, 3341–3348

35 Pascucci B, Maga G, Hubscher U, Bjoras M, Seeberg

E, Hickson ID, Villani G, Giordano C, Cellai L & Dogliotti E (2002) Reconstitution of the base excision repair pathway for 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine with puri-fied human proteins Nucleic Acids Res 30, 2124–2130

36 Dianova II, Sleeth KM, Allinson SL, Parsons JL, Bres-lin C, Caldecott KW & Dianov GL (2004) XRCC1– DNA polymerase beta interaction is required for effi-cient base excision repair Nucleic Acids Res 32, 2550– 2555

37 Braithwaite EK, Prasad R, Shock DD, Hou EW, Beard

WA & Wilson SH (2005) Role of DNA polymerase beta

in the excision step of long patch mammalian base exci-sion repair J Biol Chem 280, 18469–18475

38 Fortini P, Pascucci B, Parlanti E, Sobol RW, Wilson

SH & Dogliotti E (1998) Different DNA polymerases are involved in the short- and long-patch base excision repair in mammalian cells Biochemistry 37, 3575–3580

39 Fortini P, Parlanti E, Sidorkina OM, Laval J & Dogliotti E (1999) The type of DNA glycosylase deter-mines the base excision repair pathway in mammalian cells J Biol Chem 274, 15230–15236

40 Dianov GL, Prasad R, Wilson SH & Bohr VA (1999) Role of DNA polymerase beta in the excision step of long patch mammalian base excision repair J Biol Chem 274, 13741–13743

41 Bennett SE, Sung JS & Mosbaugh DW (2001) Fidelity

of uracil-initiated base excision DNA repair in DNA polymerase a-proficient and -deficient mouse embryonic fibroblast cell extracts J Biol Chem 276, 42588–42600

42 Dianov GL, Bischoff C, Piotrowski J & Bohr VA (1998) Repair pathways for processing of 8-oxoguanine

in DNA by mammalian cell extracts J Biol Chem 273, 33811–33816

Trang 9

43 Stucki M, Pascucci B, Parlanti E, Fortini P, Wilson SH,

Hubscher U & Dogliotti E (1998) Different DNA

poly-merases are involved in the short- and long-patch base

excision repair in mammalian cells Biochemistry 37,

3575–3580

44 Sobol RW, Horton JK, Kuhn R, Gu H, Singhal RK,

Prasad R, Rajewsky K & Wilson SH (1996)

Require-ment of mammalian DNA polymerase-beta in

base-exci-sion repair Nature 379, 183–186

45 Sobol RW, Prasad R, Evenski A, Baker A, Yang XP,

Horton JK & Wilson SH (2000) The lyase activity of

the DNA repair protein beta-polymerase protects from

DNA-damage-induced cytotoxicity Nature 405, 807–

810

46 Prasad R, Dianov GL, Bohr VA & Wilson SH (2000)

FEN1 stimulation of DNA polymerase beta mediates

an excision step in mammalian long patch base excision

repair J Biol Chem 275, 4460–4466

47 Dianov GL, Souza-Pinto N, Nyaga SG, Thybo T,

Stevnsner T & Bohr VA (2001) Base excision repair in

nuclear and mitochondrial DNA Prog Nucleic Acid Res

Mol Biol 68, 285–297

48 Dogliotti E, Fortini P, Pascucci B & Parlanti E (2001)

The mechanism of switching among multiple BER

path-ways Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 68, 3–27

49 Stucki M, Pascucci B, Parlanti E, Fortini P, Wilson SH,

Hubscher U & Dogliotti E (1998) Mammalian base

excision repair by DNA polymerases delta and epsilon

Oncogene 17, 835–843

50 Bennett RA, Wilson DM, 3rd, Wong D & Demple B

(1997) Interaction of human apurinic endonuclease and

DNA polymerase beta in the base excision repair

path-way Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94, 7166–7169

51 Caldecott KW, Aoufouchi S, Johnson P & Shall S

(1996) XRCC1 polypeptide interacts with DNA

polymerase beta and possibly poly (ADP-ribose)

polymerase, and DNA ligase III is a novel molecular

dnick-sensorT in vitro Nucleic Acids Res 24, 4387–4394

52 Dantzer F, de La Rubia G, Menissier-De Murcia J,

Hostomsky Z, de Murcia G & Schreiber V (2000) Base

excision repair is impaired in mammalian cells lacking

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 Biochemistry 39, 7559–

7569

53 Sukhanova MV, Khodyreva SN, Lebedeva NA, Prasad

R, Wilson SH & Lavrik OI (2005) Human base excision

repair enzymes apurinic⁄ apyrimidinic endonuclease1

(APE1), DNA polymerase beta and poly (ADP-ribose)

polymerase 1: interplay between strand-displacement

DNA synthesis and proofreading exonuclease activity

Nucleic Acids Res 33, 1222–1229

54 Dianova II, Bohr VA & Dianov GL (2001) Interaction

of human AP endonuclease 1 with flap endonuclease 1

and proliferating cell nuclear antigen involved in

long-patch base excision repair Biochemistry 40, 12639–

12644

55 Levin DS, McKenna AE, Motycka TA, Matsumoto Y

& Tomkinson AE (2000) Interaction between PCNA and DNA ligase I is critical for joining of Okazaki frag-ments and long-patch base-excision repair Curr Biol 10, 919–922

56 Kedar PS, Kim SJ, Robertson A, Hou E, Prasad R, Horton JK & Wilson SH (2002) Direct interaction between mammalian DNA polymerase beta and prolif-erating cell nuclear antigen J Biol Chem 277, 31115– 31123

57 Sung JS, Demott MS & Demple B (2005) Long-patch base excision DNA repair of 2-deoxyribonolactone prevents the formation of DNA-protein cross-links with DNA polymerase beta J Biol Chem 280, 39095–39103

58 Narayan S, Jaiswal AS & Balusu R (2005) Tumor sup-pressor APC blocks DNA polymerase a-dependent strand displacement synthesis during long patch but not short patch base excision repair and increases sensitivity

to methylmethane sulfonate J Biol Chem 280, 6942– 6949

59 Demple B & Harrison L (1994) Repair of oxidative damage to DNA: enzymology and biology Annu Rev Biochem 63, 915–948

60 Izumi T, Hazra TK, Boldogh I, Tomkinson AE, Park

MS, Ikeda S & Mitra S (2000) Requirement for human

AP endonuclease 1 for repair of 3¢-blocking damage at DNA single-strand breaks induced by reactive oxygen species Carcinogenesis 21, 1329–1334

61 Whitehouse CJ, Taylor RM, Thistlethwaite A, Zhang

H, Karimi-Busheri F, Lasko DD, Weinfeld M & Calde-cott KW (2001) XRCC1 stimulates human polynucleo-tide kinase activity at damaged DNA termini and accelerates DNA single-strand break repair Cell 104, 107–117

62 Horton JK, Prasad R, Hou E & Wilson SH (2000) Pro-tection against methylation-induced cytotoxicity by DNA polymerase beta-dependent long patch base exci-sion repair J Biol Chem 275, 2211–2218

63 Sattler U, Frit P, Salles B & Calsou P (2003) Long-patch DNA repair synthesis during base excision repair

in mammalian cells EMBO Rep 4, 363–367

64 Srivastava DK, Berg BJ, Prasad R, Molina JT, Beard

WA, Tomkinson AE & Wilson SH (1998) Mammalian abasic site base excision repair Identification of the reaction sequence and rate-determining steps J Biol Chem 273, 21203–21209

65 Kotera M, Roupioz Y, Defrancq E, Bourdat AG, Garcia J, Coulombeau C & Lhomme J (2000) The 7-nitroindole nucleoside as a photochemical precursor

of 2¢-deoxyribonolactone: access to DNA fragments containing this oxidative abasic lesion Chemistry 6, 4163–4169

66 Lenox HJ, McCoy CP & Sheppard TL (2001)

Site-speci-fic generation of deoxyribonolactone lesions in DNA oligonucleotides Org Lett 3, 2415–2418

Trang 10

67 Tronche C, Goodman BK & Greenberg MM (1999)

DNA damage induced via independent generation of

the radical resulting from formal hydrogen atom

abstraction from the C1¢-position of a nucleotide Chem

Biol 5, 263–271

68 Faure V, Saparbaev M, Dumy P & Constant JF (2005)

Action of multiple base excision repair enzymes on the

2¢-deoxyribonolactone Biochem Biophys Res Commun

328, 1188–1195

69 Xu YJ, DeMott MS, Hwang JT, Greenberg MM &

Demple B (2003) Action of human apurinic

endonu-clease (Ape1) on C1¢-oxidized deoxyribose damage in

DNA DNA Repair 2, 175–185

70 Faure V, Constant JF, Dumy P & Saparbaev M (2004)

2¢-deoxyribonolactone lesion produces G fi A

transi-tions in Escherichia coli Nucleic Acids Res 32, 2937–2946

71 DeMott MS, Beyret E, Wong D, Bales BC, Hwang JT,

Greenberg MM & Demple B (2002) Covalent trapping

of human DNA polymerase a by the oxidative DNA

lesion 2-deoxyribonolactone J Biol Chem 277, 7637–

7640

72 Minko IG, Kurtz AJ, Croteau DL, Van Houten B,

Harris TM & Lloyd RS (2005) Initiation of repair of

DNA-polypeptide cross-links by the UvrABC nuclease

Biochemistry 44, 3000–3009

73 Minko IG, Zou Y & Lloyd RS (2002) Incision of

DNA-protein crosslinks by UvrABC nuclease suggests a

potential repair pathway involving nucleotide excision repair Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 1905–1909

74 Feng JA, Crasto CJ & Matsumoto Y (1998) Deoxyri-bose phosphate excision by the N-terminal domain of the polymerase a: the mechanism revisited Biochemistry

37, 9605–9611

75 Wong D & Demple B (2004) Modulation of the 5¢-deo-xyribose-5-phosphate lyase and DNA synthesis activities

of mammalian DNA polymerase a by apurinic⁄ apyri-midinic endonuclease 1 J Biol Chem 279, 25268–25275

76 Bornarth CJ, Ranalli TA, Henricksen LA, Wahl AF & Bambara RA (1999) Effect of flap modifications on human FEN1 cleavage Biochemistry 38, 13347–13354

77 Sung JS & Mosbaugh DW (2003) Escherichia coli ura-cil- and ethenocytosine-initiated base excision DNA repair: rate-limiting step and patch size distribution Biochemistry 42, 4613–4625

78 Sandigursky M, Freyer GA & Franklin WA (1998) The post-incision steps of the DNA base excision repair pathway in Escherichia coli: studies with a closed circu-lar DNA substrate containing a single U : G base pair Nucleic Acids Res 26, 1282–1287

79 Dianov G & Lindahl T (1994) Reconstitution of the DNA base excision-repair pathway Curr Biol 4, 1069– 1076

Ngày đăng: 16/03/2014, 13:20

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm