CHAPTER 7 • The Cost of Production 251Policy makers around the world have been con-cerned with finding ways to reduce the use of energy.. For example, some machines might be more costly
Trang 1CHAPTER 7 • The Cost of Production 251
Policy makers around the world have been
con-cerned with finding ways to reduce the use of
energy In part, this reflects environmental
con-cerns—most energy consumption uses fossil fuels
and thus contributes to the emission of greenhouse
gases and global warming But energy, whether in
the form of oil, natural gas, coal or nuclear, is also
expensive, so if companies can find ways to reduce
their energy use, they can lower their costs
There are essentially two ways that companies
can reduce the amount of energy they use The
first is to substitute other factors of production for
energy For example, some machines might be more
costly but also use less energy, so if energy prices
rise, firms could respond by buying and using those
energy-efficient machines, effectively substituting
capital for energy This is exactly what has happened
as energy prices rose in recent years: firms bought
and installed expensive but more energy-efficient
heating and cooling systems, industrial processing
equipment, trucks, cars, and other vehicles
The second way to reduce energy use is through
technological change As time passes, research
and development lead to innovations that make it
possible to produce the same output using fewer inputs—less labor, less capital, and less energy Thus even if the relative prices of energy and capital stay the same, firms will use less energy (and less capital)
to produce the same output Advances in robotics during the past two decades are an example of this; cars and trucks are now produced with less capital and energy (as well as less labor)
These two ways of reducing energy use are illustrated in Figures 7.7(a) and (b), which show how capital and energy are combined to produce output.8 The isoquants in each figure represent the various combinations of capital and energy that can be used to generate the same level of output The figures illustrate how reductions in energy use can be achieved in two ways First, firms can substi-tute more capital for energy, perhaps in response
to a government subsidy for investment in energy-saving equipment and/or an increase in the cost of electricity This is shown as a movement along
iso-quant q1 from point A to point B in Figure 7.7(a), with capital increasing from K1 to K2 and energy
decreasing from E2 to E1 in response to a shift in the
isocost curve from C0 to C1 Second, technological
2 From the chosen isocost line, determine the minimum cost of producing
the output level that has been selected
3 Graph the output-cost combination in Figure 7.6 (b)
Suppose we begin with an output of 100 units The point of tangency of the
100-unit isoquant with an isocost line is given by point A in Figure 7.6 (a) Because
A lies on the $1000 isocost line, we know that the minimum cost of producing an
output of 100 units in the long run is $1000 We graph this combination of 100 units
of output and $1000 cost as point D in Figure 7.6 (b) Point D thus represents the
$1000 cost of producing 100 units of output Similarly, point E represents the $2000
cost of producing 200 units which corresponds to point B on the expansion path
Finally, point F represents the $3000 cost of 300 units corresponding to point C
Repeating these steps for every level of output gives the long-run total cost curve in
Figure 7.6 (b)—i.e., the minimum long-run cost of producing each level of output
In this particular example, the long-run total cost curve is a straight line
Why? Because there are constant returns to scale in production: As inputs
increase proportionately, so do outputs As we will see in the next section, the
shape of the expansion path provides information about how costs change with
the scale of the firm’s operation
Efficiency Economics and Policy,” Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2009, Vol 1: 597–619.