Effect of clay mineralogy on the feasibility of electrokinetic soil
Trang 1Effect of clay mineralogy on the feasibility of electrokinetic soil
decontamination technology
Darmawana, S.-I Wadab,*
a
Department of Bioresources and Environmental Sciences, Graduate School of Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan
b
Laboratory of Soils, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan Received 18 January 2001; received in revised form 21 June 2001; accepted 3 July 2001
Abstract
To evaluate the effect of clay mineralogy on the feasibility of electrokinetic soil remediation technology, we contaminated six soils with Cu(II), Zn(II) and Pb(II) and performed electroremediation for 570 h Cation exchange resin saturated with H+ was placed between soil and cathode to prevent soil alkalinization and trap the migrated heavy metal cations After the treatment, the heavy metal cations were sequentially extracted with water, 1 M MgCl2and hot 6 M HCl In soils dominated by crystalline clay minerals, Cu(II) and Zn(II) significantly migrated from anode end and accumulated at the cathode end forming sparingly soluble hydroxides Removal rates of Cu(II) and Zn(II) were highest in a soil dominated with kaolinite and crystalline hematite In humic – allophanic and allophanic soils, the high pH-buffering capacity of allophane kept the soil pH above 5, even
at the anode end, and Cu(II) and Zn(II) did not migrate significantly In all soils, the migration of Pb(II) was infinitesimal due to the formation of insoluble PbSO4and very strong surface complexation at the mineral surfaces These results show that the reactivity of component clay minerals to H+ and heavy metal cations has a crucial effect on the efficiency of the electrokinetic remediation technology and it is not effective for remediation of allophanic soils The results also indicate that allophanic soils may be useful as a barrier material in landfill sites.D 2002 Elsevier Science B.V All rights reserved
Keywords: Clay mineralogy; Electrokinetic remediation; Heavy metal; Soil pollution
1 Introduction
The direct disposal, dumping and tailing of wastes
containing toxic heavy metals often result in
accu-mulation of the heavy metals in soils because they
are strongly retained by some soil components such
as clay minerals and humic substances The heavy
metals retained in soils are, however, gradually released into pore water, resulting in pollution of surface and ground waters In addition, fine-grained soil particles retaining heavy metals are transported
as airborne dust and contaminate agricultural land and crops Thus, the heavy metal-contamination of soils occurring in industrial areas is a great concern due to its direct and indirect harmful effects on human health
Among many technologies developed to decon-taminate heavy metal-polluted soils, the electrokinetic method is regarded as an effective technique partic-ularly for soils having low hydraulic conductivity 0169-1317/02/$ - see front matter D 2002 Elsevier Science B.V All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 1 6 9 - 1 3 1 7 ( 0 1 ) 0 0 0 8 0 - 1
* Corresponding author Tel.: 642-2844; fax:
+81-92-642-2864.
E-mail address: wadasi@agr.kyushu-u.ac.jp (S.-I Wada).
www.elsevier.com/locate/clay
Trang 2(Acar and Alshawabkeh, 1993) In electrokinetic
remediation, a direct current is passed through a soil
to induce the electromigration and electroosmosis
towards the electrode where the contaminants are
collected According to an analysis by Acar and
Alshawabkeh (1993), electromigration is more
im-portant at least for removal of ionic contaminants
For successful decontamination of heavy metal ions,
therefore, it is important to convert the precipitated
and adsorbed ions into dissolved forms
Heavy metals incorporated into soils take
differ-ent chemical forms including (1) dissolved ionic
form, (2) electrostatically adsorbed form, and (3)
surface complexed form (Darmawan and Wada,
1999) Layer silicate minerals having excess surface
negative charge arising from isomorphous
substitu-tion adsorb heavy metal casubstitu-tions electrostatically Due
to the nonspecific nature of the coulombic force, the
adsorbed heavy metal cations are easily exchanged
by other cations The selectivity coefficient, for
example, for Cu – Na exchange on a montmorillonite
is near unity (Sposito et al., 1981) On the other hand,
oxides and hydroxides of iron and aluminum as well
as humic substances bind heavy metal cations very
strongly, forming surface complexes, in which the
bonding between heavy metal cation and surface
functional groups bears some covalency The surface
complexed heavy metal cations are, therefore, not
exchanged by common ions in the pore water of
soils
Thus, it is expected that the feasibility of the
electro-kinetic remediation method depends strongly on
min-eralogical composition as well as on soil organic matter content Studies by Puppala et al (1997), Reddy et al (1997), and Grundl and Reese (1997) suggested that the electrokinetic method is not necessarily effective for soils with high adsorption capacity and also for those containing calcium carbonate To date, however, many researchers have used only artificially polluted model soils made up of pure clays such as kaolinite (Acar and Alshawabkeh, 1996; Yeung et al., 1996; Dzenitis, 1997) and smectite (Reddy et al., 1997; Grundl and Reese, 1997) or their mixture with quartz (Kawachi and Kubo, 1999) in developing and evaluating the electro-kinetic remediation technology There seems to be no systematic experimental study in which the electro-kinetic remediation method is applied to a series of natural soils that differ in mineralogical composition In the present study, therefore, six soils that differ in clay mineralogy and organic matter content were contami-nated with salts of copper, lead, and zinc, subjected to electrokinetic remediation treatment, and the behaviors
of the heavy metal cations were analyzed through successive extraction
2 Materials Six soil samples from different locations were used in the present study They were air-dried and passed through a 2-mm sieve Some chemical and mineralogical properties determined by standard pro-cedures (Page et al., 1982; Klute, 1986) are listed in Table 1
Table 1
Selected properties of soil samples
carbon (g kg 1)
Clay (g kg 1)
Allophane and/
or imogolite (g kg 1)
DCB a Fe 2 O 3
(g kg 1)
Major cation exchanger
kaolinite
kaolinite
a
Dithionite – citrate – bicarbonate.
b
No measurement.
Trang 3As shown in Table 1, the Nakajo, Fukuchiyama,
Harumachi, and Pakchong soils are predominated by
crystalline clay minerals Among these four soil
samples, effective CEC of the Pakchong soil is the
lowest irrespective of its extremely high clay content,
reflecting the predominance of kaolinite in its clay
fraction The Goshi and Choyo soils are similar in
that the clay consists exclusively of allophane and
imogolite but the Goshi soil has much higher organic
matter content Table 1 also shows that the amounts
of Fe and Mn oxides dissolved by dithionite –
cit-rate – bicarbonate (DCB) treatment (Mehra and
Jack-son, 1960) All the soil samples have fairly high
amounts of DCB soluble iron oxide with a maximum
amounts of DCB soluble Mn oxides are much lower
Electron microscopy (photos not presented) showed
that the iron oxide in the Pakchong soil exists as fine
pseudo-hexagonal hematite particles, whereas no
dis-crete iron oxide particles was detectable in other
soils
mixing the soil samples with the calculated amounts
of CuSO45H2O, ZnSO47H2O and Pb(NO3)2 and
aged for 1 year at field moisture contents These three
metal cations were employed because they are
expected to behave differently in soils (Darmawan
and Wada, 1999), i.e., Cu(II) and Pb(II) are highly
specifically adsorbed by oxides and humic substances
but Pb(II) tends to form sparingly soluble sulfates, and
Zn(II) is preferred rather by layer silicate minerals
The detailed procedure of the sample preparation is given in Darmawan and Wada (1999) Since Cu(II) and Zn(II) were added as soluble sulfate, sulfate ion from these salts would have reacted with Pb(II) ion
during aging Although this makes the system com-plicated, the present combination of salts was selected because PbSO4is one of the major forms of Pb(II) in heavily polluted soils
3 Methods The apparatus was made from an open plastic box with dimensions of 220 55 55 mm by partitioning
it into four compartments with nylon cloth and attach-ing an inlet for anolyte, as shown in Fig 1 The polluted soil samples were packed into the largest central compartment and a pair of graphite electrodes was placed in the two compartments at the two ends The weight of the packed soil was 320 g for the Nakajo soil, 355 g for the Fukuchiyama soil, 350 g for the Harumachi soil, 335 g for the Pakchong soil, 317
g for the Goshi soil, and 201 g for the Choyo soil The compartment between the soil and electrode was packed with H-saturated cation exchange resin
at the cathode and to trap heavy metal cations (Wada and Ryu, 1999)
The inlet of the apparatus, packed with the soil and resin, was connected to a constant head device containing 10 mM NaCl solution to saturate the
Fig 1 Schematic illustration of the experimental cell.
Trang 4interstitial pores of the soil After saturation, the
level of the anolyte was set 5 mm below the soil
surface (Wada et al., 1999) and 20-V potential was
applied with a stabilized power supply Throughout
the treatment, the electric current was monitored
with an ammeter inserted in the circuit (Fig 1)
After 570 h, the apparatus was disconnected from
the power supply and the soil column was cut into
six slices of equal length, and air-dried The soil pH
was measured at a soil/water ratio = 1:2.5 Portions
(2 g) of the air-dried samples were placed in
poly-carbonate centrifuge tubes and extracted sequentially
for 1 h at room temperature HCl extraction was
performed by digesting with 10 ml of 30% H2O2to
dryness followed by refluxing with 16 ml of 6 M
HCl (Asami and Kato, 1977) at boiling point The
extracted Cu(II), Pb(II) and Zn(II) were determined
by atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) following
the procedures described by Amacher (1996) and
Reed and Martens (1996)
The resin was collected quantitatively and packed
in a column The adsorbed metal cations were
ex-tracted by leaching with 1 M NH4NO3and determined
by AAS
All the measurements were carried out in duplicate
and the results were averaged
4 Results and discussion
The measured electric currents are plotted against
elapsed time in Fig 2 In general, the electric current
decreased rapidly in the first 50-h period followed by
gradual decrease in the subsequent 150 h for all
soils The mode of variation and the magnitude of
the current were, however, significantly different
among soils For the Nakajo, Fukuchiyama and
Harumachi soils, the initial electric current was about
13 – 19 mA and it monotonically decreased to the
final range of 1.6 – 2.7 mA The trend was quite
similar for the Goshi and Choyo soils but both the
initial and final values were much lower, i.e., 5.5 –
6.2 mA and 0.2 – 0.5 mA, respectively For the
Pakchong soil, on the other hand, the electric current
increased up to 28 mA after 7 h and rapidly dropped down to < 1 mA after 200 h
The higher initial values of the electric current are obviously due to the higher electrolyte concentration
in the pore water Since indigenous soluble salts are negligible in all soils and the amount of added heavy metal salts were the same, the cause of the lower initial current for humic – allophanic Goshi and allo-phanic Choyo soils would be that the cations and anions of the added salts were adsorbed on the soil materials to a larger extent (Wada, 1984) The cause of the rapid increase and immediate decrease is not clear but the higher initial electric current in the Pakchong soil supports the contention that the initial contents of water soluble Cu(II), Pb(II) and Zn(II) were the high-est in the Pakchong soil (Figs 3 – 5)
The pH profiles along the soil column after the treatment as well as the initial pH values are pre-sented in Fig 6 Since H+ ion was generated by the electrolysis reaction of water continuously at the anode and it migrated toward the cathode, soil pH significantly dropped, particularly in the section neighboring the anode In the Nakajo, Fukuchiyama, Harumachi and Pakchong soils predominated by crystalline clay minerals, the pH of the soil section next to the anode was below 3 Among these four soils, the Pakchong soil was conspicuous and the pH was far below 3 in the first through fifth sections In the Nakajo, Fukuchiyama, and Harumachi soils, on the other hand, the magnitude of the pH drop de-creased toward the cathode and the pH value of the soil section neighboring the cathode was quite near
Fig 2 Time course of electric current.
Trang 5the initial one The magnitude of pH drops was much
smaller in the humic – allophanic Goshi and
allo-phanic Choyo soils and the pH was mostly kept
above 5 except in the section neighboring the anode
The plots in Fig 2 were interpolated by a cubic
spline function and integrated over the treatment time
to calculate the amount of the electric charge
trans-ported through the soil samples The calculated
amount of charge was 7.95 kC for the Nakajo, 5.72
kC for Fukuchiyama, 4.90 kC for Harumachi, 4.76 kC
for Pakchong, 1.98 kC for Goshi, and 0.649 kC for
Choyo soils If it is assumed that the electrolytic
generation of H+ ion is proportional to the electric
current, the H+ ion supplies in the Goshi and Choyo
soils were estimated to be much smaller than that in
other soils However, the pH profiles for the Goshi
and Choyo soils are quite similar irrespective of the
difference in the amount of the transported charge,
and the differences in H+ ion concentration estimated
from the pH values are much smaller than those
expected from the differences in the charge transport
(Fig 2) These data suggest that the lower electric currents in the Goshi and Choyo soils are not a major cause for their higher pH values
Alternatively and probably the most important cause for that would be the higher acid-buffering capacity of the soils Allophane and imogolite present in these soils contain large amounts of surface aluminol groups (Wada, 1984) On addition of an acid, HA, the alumi-nol groups uptake H+ ion and the resulting positively charged sites retain the accompanying anion:
With this reaction, the H+ ion generated at the anode would have largely been consumed, and in turn, the pH of the interstitial water dropped to a lesser extent It seems contradictory that the Pakchong soil containing the largest amount of free iron oxide, which can uptake H+ ions and anions, exhibited the lowest pH However, iron oxide in the Pakchong soil was mostly crystalline hematite, whereas it was non-Fig 3 Distribution of three forms of Cu(II) in soils after treatment.
Trang 6crystalline in other soils Higher crystallinity of free
iron oxide and the predominance of kaolinite with low
cation adsorbing capacity would have favored the
acidification in the Pakchong soil
The contents of three forms of Cu(II), Pb(II), and
Zn(II) in soil slices after electrokinetic treatment are
presented in Figs 3 – 5, together with their initial
concentrations Comparison of these figures indicates
that the distribution pattern of Cu(II) and Zn(II) are
similar for all soils while that of Pb(II) differed
significantly The distribution of Pb(II) was distinctly
different in that the removal rate was significantly
lower and the proportion of the MgCl2-extractable
fraction was comparable to or even higher than the
HCl-extractable fraction (Fig 4)
In the present extraction procedure,
water-extract-able Cu(II), Pb(II) and Zn(II) would come mostly
-extractable fraction would basically represent those
retained on layer silicate clay minerals as
exchange-able cations HCl-extractexchange-able fraction would
corre-spond to those bound as surface complexes on iron oxides, allophane and humic substances (Darmawan and Wada, 1999) as well as hydroxide precipitates
In addition, for Pb, the MgCl2-extractable fraction would include Pb(II) precipitated as PbSO4 (angle-site) in addition to exchangeable Pb(II), due to the increased solubility of PbSO4 in a concentrated Mg
sulfate ion is reduced by the formation of soluble
Pitz-er’s model (Gueddari et al., 1983) showed that the ion activity product of (Pb2 +)(SO4
) would never
solubility product of PbSO4is 1.62 10 7(Lindsay, 1979), the precipitate of PbSO4 is expected to have dissolved during extraction and the MgCl2 -extract-able fraction can be regarded as a sum of exchange-able Pb and PbSO4
Before treatment, copper was found mostly in the strong acid-extractable fraction, except in the Pak-chong soil After the treatment, Cu(II) content re-Fig 4 Distribution of three forms of Pb(II) in soils after treatment.
Trang 7duced markedly in soil sections near the anode to
less than 100 mg kg 1 and accumulated in sections
near the cathode in the Nakajo, Fukuchiyama, and
Harumachi soils Comparison of Figs 3 and 6
sug-gests that the amount of Cu(II) left in the soil is
inversely correlated with pH The stability of surface complexes of Cu(II) on oxide and humic substances decreases steeply below pH 4 (McKenzie, 1980; Kendorf and Schnitzer, 1980) The distribution pat-tern of Cu(II) shown in Fig 3 suggests that Cu(II) was released from surface functional groups, mig-rated toward the cathode and hydrolyzed to precip-itate when it entered into a region of higher pH, as repeatedly reported by many researchers (Yeung et al., 1996; Puppala et al., 1997; Viadero et al., 1998)
A noticeable feature in Fig 3 is that significant
Cu(II) appeared in the fourth to sixth sections from the anode in the Nakajo, Fukuchiyama, and Haru-machi soils Darmawan and Wada (1999) showed that heavy metal cations loaded to soils are rapidly adsorbed at permanent negative charge on layer sili-cate minerals, and then slowly transferred to oxides and humic substances to form surface complexes in
50 days This and the results presented in Fig 3 suggest that the role of cation exchange sites on Fig 5 Distribution of three forms of Zn(II) in soils after treatment.
Fig 6 Profile of soil pH after treatment.
Trang 8layer silicate minerals becomes more important in a
nonequilibrium migration process, particularly at low
pH where the stability of surface complexes is low
Thus, longer treatment time and more electrical
power are required for remediation of soils with high
cation exchange capacity (Puppala et al., 1997)
Fortunately, the cation exchange sites of layer silicate
minerals do not show high preference for heavy
metal cations (Sposito et al., 1981) The efficiency
of electrokinetic remediation may be improved by
adding salts of noncontaminant cations, e.g., CaCl2,
that compete with heavy metal cations for the
ex-change site
In the Pakchong soil, the Cu(II) removal rate was
the highest among the soils Total content of the three
forms of Cu(II) was below 100 mg kg 1in the first
and second sections and it was about 200 mg kg 1in
the fifth section, i.e., the removal rate was > 80% The
relatively high removal rate would have resulted from
the relatively low pH of the original soil and low
cation exchange capacity (Table 1) and higher
crys-tallinity, and therefore, lower reactivity of iron oxide
minerals
In contrast, Cu(II) was not removed at all from
the Goshi soil (Fig 3) It is apparent that a major
cause of this is the high acid-buffering capacity of
the soil (Fig 6) In addition, the extremely high
selectivity of humic substances for Cu(II) would
have contributed the result A significant reduction
of Cu(II) content in the section neighboring the
anode in the allophanic Choyo soil that showed
the same pH value to the corresponding section of
the humic – allophanic Goshi soil (Fig 6) supports
this view
Fig 4 shows that the behavior of Zn(II) is basically
similar to that of Cu(II) but Zn(II) is much more
mobile under the applied electric field
The behavior of Pb(II) shown in Fig 5 is distinctly
different from that of Cu(II) and Zn(II) First, the
proportion of MgCl2-extractable fraction is apparently
larger in soils dominated by layer silicate minerals
before treatment This must be due to the presence of
PbSO4and its dissolution in 1 M MgCl2solution as
already discussed Second, the removal rate was
significantly lower than that for Cu(II) and Zn(II)
and half or more of the remaining Pb(II) was in an
MgCl2-extractable form in all soils, except for
hu-mic – allophanic and allophanic soils
Since PbSO4 precipitated in soils does not move either via electrophoresis or via electroosmosis, lower removal rates were expected in soils in which a large proportion of Pb(II) was in a form of PbSO4 Actually the results obtained for the Nakajo, Fukuchiyama, Harumachi and Pakchong soils (Fig 5) follow the expected trend In these soils the HCl-extractable fraction, i.e., surface complexed Pb(II), reduced sig-nificantly in sections near the anode and seems to have accumulated in the following sections
In contrast, most of the Pb(II) was found in HCl-extractable fraction and the proportion of MgCl2 -extractable fractions were low in the Goshi and Choyo soils both before and after the treatment (Fig 5) This indicates that the precipitation of PbSO4 was greatly suppressed in these soils
and Pb2 + adsorption As already discussed, Pb2 + forms stable surface complexes with surface hy-droxyl groups on minerals and carboxyl groups on humic substance The reaction can be expressed, for example,
where SOH stands for surface hydroxyl groups and carboxyl groups In acidic condition, some surface hydroxyl groups, typically AlOH and FeOH groups, are protonated and adsorb anions Among anions, oxo-anions are adsorbed more strongly The reaction can be expressed as:
Since allophanic soils have large amount of the both types of functional groups, the overall reaction is:
With the simultaneous adsorption of Pb2 + and SO4 , the activity of these ions in solution would be main-tained low enough to prevent formation of PbSO4(s)
In the present study, H-saturated cation exchange resin was placed between cathode and soil to prevent alkalinization of soil and to trap the migrated heavy metal cations Wada and Ryu (1999) have examined
Trang 9this in Cu(II) removal from an artificially
contami-nated soil and found that the alkalinization of the soil
neighboring the anode was successfully suppressed
and the whole soil was acidified The pH profile in
Fig 6, however, shows that the alkalinization was
prevented but the acid front did not reach the cathodic
end of the soil Therefore, the migrated heavy metal
cations hydrolyzed and accumulated in the soil section
nearest to the cathode The reason for the difference
between the present result and those by Wada and Ryu
(1999) is not clear One possible reason is that there
was no drainage of catholyte in the present study
The mass balances of Cu(II), Zn(II) and Pb(II) are
listed in Table 2 The percentages of the total detected
heavy metals were mostly >90 except for Zn in the
Fukuchiyama soil Since there was no noticeable
interference in the AAS determination, the missing
portions of the heavy metals would have associated
with the nylon cloth used for separating the resin and
soils Although there are some uncertainties, Table 2
clearly shows that the percentages of Cu(II) and Pb(II)
trapped in the cation exchange resin were generally
low for all the soil samples than those of Zn(II) Since
the objective of the present study was to examine the
effect of clay mineralogy on the efficiency of
elec-trokinetic remediation technology, any additional enhancement was not performed With some enhance-ment techniques including addition of salts of non-contaminant cations, soil acidification, and drainage
of catholyte, the removal rate would be improved, at least, for nonallophanic soils
The results for the Goshi and Choyo soils sug-gest that the electrokinetic technology would not work for humic – allophanic and allophanic soils, at least for Cu(II) removal Nevertheless, this may not
be a negative finding The extremely low mobility
of heavy metal cations in these soils even under electrokinetic treatment strongly indicates that heavy metal cations incorporated in these types of soils are expected not to be leached into the ground water under the conditions normally encountered in nature This indicates the possible use of these types of soils for low-cost permeable barrier at waste landfill site
5 Conclusions
. Cu(II) and Zn(II) electrically migrated from the anode toward the cathode to a significant extent in
Table 2
Mass balance of Cu, Pb and Zn
Heavy metal Soil name Initial (g) Remained in soil Adsorbed in resin Total detected
Trang 10soils dominated by crystalline clay minerals But a
lesser drop in pH of soil section near the cathode has
led to the precipitation of Cu(II) and Zn(II) into
hydroxides Among these soils, the electrokinetic
removal of Cu(II) and Zn(II) in the kaolinitic
Pak-chong was the highest due to low initial pH, low
cation exchange capacity, and lower reactivity of iron
oxide minerals of this soil
soils dominated by crystalline clay minerals would
be increased by some enhancement techniques,
including addition of salts of competing
nonconta-minant cations, soil acidification, and catholyte
drainage
allophanic and allophanic soils are the major factors
that have hindered the electromigration of Cu(II) and
Zn(II) in these soils
. Precipitation as sparingly soluble PbSO4 and
stable surface complexation with hydroxyl groups of
minerals and carboxyl groups of humic substances
have resulted in extremely low migration of Pb(II)
from all soils under study
humic – allophanic and allophanic soils and their
extremely low mobility even under electrical field
indicate the possible use of these soils as an ideal
permeable barrier at landfill site
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr Mochizuki of Experimental Farm of
Kyushu University for providing a soil sample This
study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for
Scientific Research (#11660066) from the Japanese
Society for Promotion of Sciences
References
Acar, Y.B., Alshawabkeh, A.N., 1993 Principles of electrokinetic
remediation Environ Sci Technol 27, 2638 – 2647.
Acar, Y.B., Alshawabkeh, A.N., 1996 Electrokinetic remediation: I.
Pilot-scale tests with lead-spiked kaolinite ASCE J Geotech.
Eng 122, 173 – 185.
Amacher, M.C., 1996 Nickel, cadmium and lead In: Sparks, D.L.
(Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 Chemical methods Soil
Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 739 – 768.
Asami, T., Kato, K., 1977 Comparison of analytical methods for total cadmium, zinc, lead and copper in soils Jpn J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 48, 335 – 336 (in Japanese).
Darmawan, Wada, S.-I., 1999 Kinetics of speciation of Cu, Pb and
Zn loaded to soils that differ in cation exchanger composition
at low moisture content Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 30,
2363 – 2375.
Dzenitis, J.M., 1997 Soil chemistry effects and flow prediction in electroremediation of soil Environ Sci Technol 31, 1191 – 1197.
Grundl, T., Reese, C., 1997 Laboratory study of electrokinetic ef-fects in complex natural sediments J Hazard Mater 55, 187 – 201.
Gueddari, M., Monnin, C., Perret, D., Fritz, B., Tardy, Y., 1983 Geochemistry of brines of the Chot El Jerid in southern Tune-sia—application of Pitzer’s equations Chem Geol 39, 165 – 178.
Kawachi, T., Kubo, H., 1999 Model experimental study on the migration behavior of heavy metals in electrokinetic remedia-tion process for contaminated soil Soil Sci Plant Nutr 45,
259 – 268.
Kendorf, H., Schnitzer, M., 1980 Sorption of metals on humic acid Geochim Cosmochim Acta 44, 1701 – 1708.
Klute, A., 1986 Methods of soil analysis: Pt 2 Physical and min-eralogical methods, 2nd edn Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin.
Lindsay, W.L., 1979 Chemical equilibria in soils Wiley, New York.
McKenzie, R.M., 1980 The adsorption of lead and other heavy metals on oxides of manganese and iron Aust J Soil Res.
18, 61 – 73.
Mehra, O., Jackson, M.L., 1960 Iron oxide removal from soils and clays by a dithionite – citrate system with sodium bicarbonate buffer Clays Clay Miner 7, 313 – 327.
Page, A.L., Miller, R.H., Keeney, D.R., 1982 Methods of soil analysis: Pt 1 Chemical and microbiological properties, 2nd edn Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin Puppala, S.K., Alshawabkeh, A.N., Acar, Y.B., Gale, R.J., Bricka, J., 1997 Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of high sorption capacity soil J Hazard Mater 55, 203 – 220.
Reddy, K.R., Parupudi, U.S., Devulapalli, S.N., Xu, C.Y., 1997 Effects of soil composition on the removal of chromium by electrokinetics J Hazard Mater 55, 135 – 158.
Reed, S.T., Martens, D.C., 1996 Copper and zinc In: Sparks, D.L (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 Chemical meth-ods Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 703 – 722.
Sposito, G., Holtzclaw, K.M., Johnston, C.T., LeVesque-Madore, C.S., 1981 Thermodynamics of sodium – copper exchange on Wyoming bentonite at 298 K Soil Sci Soc Am J 45, 1079 – 1083.
Viadero Jr., R.C., Reed, B.E., Berg, M., Ramsey, J 1998 A laboratory-scale study of applied voltage on the electrokinetic separation of lead from soils Sep Sci Technol 33, 1833 – 1859.
Wada, S.-I., 1984 Mechanism of apparent salt absorption in Ando soils Soil Sci Plant Nutr 30, 77 – 83.