EDTA enhanced heavy metal phytoextraction metal accumulation leaching and toxicity
Trang 1© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers Printed in the Netherlands.
EDTA enhanced heavy metal phytoextraction: metal accumulation,
leaching and toxicity
H Grˇcman, Š Velikonja-Bolta, D Vodnik, B Kos & D Leštan1
Agronomy Department, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
1Corresponding author∗
Received 7 November 2000 Accepted in revised form 25 May 2001
Key words: cadmium, contaminated soil, EDTA, lead, phytoextraction, zinc
Abstract
Synthetic chelates such as ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) have been shown to enhance phytoextraction
of some heavy metals from contaminated soil In a soil column study, we examined the effect of EDTA on the
uptake of Pb, Zn and Cd by Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa), mobilization and leaching of heavy metals and the
toxicity effects of EDTA additions on plants The most effective was a single dose of 10 mmol EDTA kg−1 soil
where we detected Pb, Zn and Cd concentrations that were 104.6, 3.2 and 2.3-times higher in the aboveground plant biomass compared to the control treatments The same EDTA addition decreased the concentration of Pb,
Zn and Cd in roots of tested plants by 41, 71 and 69%, respectively compared to concentrations in the roots of control plants In columns treated with 10 mmol kg−1 EDTA, up to 37.9, 10.4 and 56.3% of initial total Pb, Zn
and Cd in soil were leached down the soil profile, suggesting high solubility of heavy metals-EDTA complexes
EDTA treatment had a strong phytotoxic effect on the red clover (Trifolium pratense) in bioassay experiment.
Moreover, the high dose EDTA additions inhibited the development of arbuscular mycorrhiza The results of phospholipid fatty acid analyses indicated toxic effects of EDTA on soil fungi and increased environmental stress
of soil microfauna
Abbreviations: HM – heavy metal; PLFA – phospholipid fatty acid; DGFA – diglyceride fatty acid
Introduction
Heavy metal (HM) contamination of soils has
be-come a serious problem in areas of intense industry
and agriculture HMs are deposited in soils by
at-mospheric input and the use of mineral fertilizers or
compost, and sewage sludge disposal Soils polluted
with HMs pose a health hazard to humans as well as
plants and animals, often requiring soil remediation
practices Conventional remediation methods usually
involve excavation and removal of contaminated soil
layer, physical stabilization (mixing of soil with
ce-ment, lime, apatite etc.), or washing of contaminated
soils with strong acids or HM chelators (Berti et al.,
1998; Steele and Pichtel, 1998)
∗ FAX NO: +386-01-423-1088; E-mail:
domen.lestan@bf.uni-lj.si
Wide-spread low to medium level pollution of agri-cultural land represents a specific problem In Europe, though the extent of areas that are affected has not been accurately determined, the polluted agricultural lands likely encompass several million of ha (Flath-man and Lanza, 1998) European Union Council dir-ective (1986) limits values for concentrations of HMs
in arable soils to 3 mg kg−1for Cd, 140 mg kg−1for
Cu, 75 mg kg−1for Ni, 300 mg kg−1for Pb, 300 mg
kg−1for Zn and 1.5 mg kg−1for Hg The remediation
of large areas of agricultural land by conventional technologies used for small areas of heavily contam-inated sites is not feasible economically However, if
no remediation action is undertaken, the availability
of arable land for cultivation will decrease, because of stricter environmental laws limiting food production
on contaminated lands
Trang 2Recently, heavy metal phytoextraction has emerged
as a promising, cost-effective alternative to the
conventional engineering-based remediation methods
(Salt et al., 1995) Early phytoextraction research
fo-cused on hyperaccumulating plants which have the
ability to concentrate high amounts of HMs in their
plant tissues However, hyperaccumulators often
ac-cumulate only a specific element, and are as a rule
slow growing, low biomass producing plants with little
known agronomic characteristics (Cunningham et al.,
1995) This constrains their practical use for
phytore-mediation, since the total metal extraction is the
product of plant biomass and HM tissue concentration
Recent research has shown that chemical
amend-ments, such as synthetic organic chelates, can enhance
phytoextraction by increasing HMs bioavailability in
soil thus enhancing plant uptake, and translocation of
HMs from the roots to the green parts of tested plants
(Epstein et al., 1999; Huang et al., 1997) Of the
che-lates tested, ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA)
was often found to be the most effective (Blaylock et
al., 1997)
Restrictions apply, however, to the use of EDTA
and other chelating agents EDTA and EDTA-HM
complexes are toxic (Dirilgen, 1998; Sillanpaeae et
al., 1996) and poorly photo-, chemo- and
biodegrad-able in soil (Nörtemann, 1999) In situ application of
chelating agents can cause groundwater pollution by
uncontrolled metal dissolution and leaching
There-fore, the potential risks of use of EDTA or other
chelators for phytoextraction should be thoroughly
evaluated before steps towards further development
and commercialization of this remediation technology
are attempted
In the present study, soil column experiments were
used to evaluate the effects of different amounts and
modes of EDTA application on Pb, Zn and Cd uptake
by test plant Brassica rapa We monitored the
leach-ing of HMs and EDTA through the soil profile We
also tested phytotoxicity and toxicity of EDTA
addi-tion to arbuscular mycorrhiza formaaddi-tion and other soil
microorganisms
Materials and methods
Soil preparation and experimental set up
Soil samples were collected from 0–30 cm surface
layer at an industrial site of a former Pb and Zn smelter
in Slovenia The following soil properties were
de-termined: pH (CaCl ) 6.8, organic matter 5.2%, total
N 0.25%, sand 55.4%, coarse silt 12.0%, fine silt 18.9%, clay 13.7%, P (as P2O5) 37.3 mg 100 g−1,
K (as K2O) 9.2 mg 100 g−1, Pb 1100 mg kg−1, Zn
800 mg kg−1, Cd 5.5 mg kg−1 Soil texture was
sandy loam After being air-dried, the soil was passed
through a 4-mM sieve.
The influence of EDTA (Fluka, Steinheim) on Pb,
Zn and Cd plant uptake, leaching, and toxicity was tested in soil column experiment with four replicates for each treatment We placed 3755 g of air dried soil into 18 cm high 15 cm diameter columns which were equipped with trapping devices for leachete col-lection Plastic mesh (D=0.2 mm) was placed to the bottom of the columns to retain the soil We fertil-ized the soils in all treatments with 150 mg kg−1 N
and K as (NH4)2SO4and K2SO4, respectively Three
weeks old seedlings of Brassica rapa L var
pekinen-sis (Nagaoka F1) were transplanted into columns and
were grown for 4 weeks In some treatments, EDTA was applied in 100 ml of deionised water in four partial-weekly additions (1, 8, 15, 22 day of culture)
In others, EDTA was added in a single dose of total
of 3, 5 and 10 mmol kg−1EDTA on the 22th day of
cultivation We used three different watering regimes (Table 1) We harvested the aboveground tissues on the 28th day of cultivation, by cutting the stem 1 cm above soil surface We determined biomass after the tissues dried at 60◦C reached a constant weight.
We sampled leachates on 6th, 13th, 20th and 27th day of cultivation They were filtered through What-man No 1 filter paper and stored in cold storage for further analysis
Heavy metals determination
For the analysis of metals content, the soil samples were ground in an agate mill for 10 min and then
passed through a 150 µm sieve After the diges-tion of soils in aqua regia, AAS was used for the
determination of HM concentrations
Shoot tissues were collected and thoroughly washed with deionized water Roots were carefully but vigorously washed with running water to remove soil particles This procedure presumably removed dead plant roots Plant samples were dried at 60◦C to
con-stant weight and ground in a titanium centrifugal mill Metal concentrations in plant tissue samples (250–
300 mg dry weight) were determined using acid (65% HNO3) dissolution technique with microwave heating and analysed by Flame-AAS or at low concentration
of Cd and Pb by Electrothermal-AAS HMs
Trang 3concen-Table 1 Amounts of water added in three watering regimes during the course of phytoextraction
Time of experiment (day)
trations in leachates were determined by Flame-AAS
Controls of the analytical procedure were performed
using blanks and references materials (BCR 60 and
BCR 141R, Community Bureau of Reference, for
plant and soil) treated in the same way as experimental
samples Two determinations of the concentration of
HMs was realized per sample
EDTA determination
EDTA in leachate was determined
spectrophotomet-ricaly according to the procedure of Hamano et al
(1993)
Estimation of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculum
potential
The total mycorrhizal inoculum potential of soils from
different EDTA treatments (watering regime A only –
Table 1) was determined by growing bait plants
Tri-folium pratense in intact cores of pre-treated soils to
measure the rate of mycorrhiza formation One 150
ml intact soil core was sampled from each pot after
the above ground portions of cabbage plants were
harvested Each core was sown by 30 seeds of red
clover Trifolium pratense In a previous experiment,
we found that rhizobia were present in the substrate,
therefore, no rhizobia was added to the pots The pots
were placed in the greenhouse The plants were
har-vested after 3 months Shoots were oven dried and
dry weight was determined The roots were washed,
cleared with 10% KOH at 90◦C for 75 min, rinsed in
tap water and stained with trypan blue in lactoglycerol
for 15 min at 90◦C The staining method was
mod-ified from Phillips and Hayman (1970) Mycorrhizal
infection was estimated according to Trouvelot et al
(1986) Mycorrhizal frequency (F%) was calculated
Phospholipid extraction and determination
Structure and activity of microbial populations was as-sessed using phospholipid and diglyceride fatty acids techniques (PLFA and DGFA) At the end of the phytoextraction experiment, 5 g of soil from the up-per layer of each column with single EDTA additions were sampled Lipids were extracted with one phase mixture (chloroform, methanol, citric buffer pH 4), diglicerides separated from phospholipids and glycol-ipids on SPE-Si columns, subjected to mild alkaline methanolysis, and methy esters quantified with
GC-MS according to Frostegård et al (1991) and White
et al (1998) 19:0 methyl ester was used as internal standard
The ratio between dead and viable microbial bio-mass was calculated by dividing total diglycerides (DGFA) by total phospholipids (PLFA) (Ringelberg et al., 1997)
The structure of microbial groups in soil was presented in relative shares of microbial groups, de-termined as mol% of PLFAs indicative for particular microbial groups against total PLFAs One must bear
in mind that the development of different groups of mi-croorganisms inferred from the changes in the PLFA pattern does not give absolute amounts of biomass
of different groups, since conversion factors from the microorganism groups to actual biomass are lacking Fatty acids were designated using the nomenclature described by Frostegård and Bååth (1996)
Statistical analyses
The data were statistically evaluated with analysis
of variance HM concentrations in plant tissue were square-root transformed before analysis to stabilize the variance Tukey’s multiple range test was used
to determine the significance (P=0.05) between all
possible pairs
Trang 4Figure 1 Pb, Cd and Zn concentrations in roots and leaves
of Brassica rapa grown on contaminated soil (watering
re-gime A) in response to the 3 mmol kg −1 single dose addition
(EDTA/3S), 5 mmol kg −1single dose addition (EDTA/5S), 5 mmol
kg −1weekly additions (EDTA/5W), 10 mmol kg−1single dose
ad-dition (EDTA/10S), 10 mmol kg −1weekly additions (EDTA/10W)
of EDTA and control soil with no EDTA addition Means of four
replicates are presented, error bars represent standard deviation.
Results
Heavy metals plant uptake and leaching
Cabbage (Brassica rapa) was selected as a test plant
due to its substantial Pb and Zn phytoextraction
po-tential (Xian, 1989) The analysis of plant material
indicated that the addition of HM complexing agent
EDTA to the soil increased the concentrations of Pb,
Zn and Cd in the leaves of the test plant (Figure 1)
Plant uptake of Pb was particularly enhanced Even
at the lowest tested single dose addition of EDTA (3
mmol kg−1 soil), the concentrations of Pb in leaves
were 16.6-times higher than those in control plants
When 10 mmol kg−1EDTA was added in single dose,
Pb concentration in the leaves increased for
104.6-times The same amount of EDTA applied in four weekly additions resulted in 44-fold increase of Pb in leaves It was significantly less effective than a single dose and statistically comparable to weekly additions
of the total 5 mmol kg−1EDTA.
The effect of EDTA additions on Cd and Zn plant uptake was less prominent In the treatment with the highest EDTA addition (10 mmol kg−1in single dose),
the concentration of Cd and Zn in leaves increased for 2.3 and 3.2-fold, respectively, compared to the control treatment (Figure 1) Other single or weekly EDTA additions increased Cd and Zn content in plant tissues for less than 2-times compared to control and had no statistically different effects The increase watering re-gime (watering rere-gime B,C) slightly decrease the HMs concentration in plant tissue
As shown in Figure 1, a single addition of 10 mmol
kg−1EDTA significantly (P=0.05) decreased the
con-centration of Zn and Cd in roots of tested plants by
71 and 69% compared to concentrations in the roots
of control plants The decrease of Pb concentration in roots by 41% compared to the control was not
statist-ically significant (P=0.05) Dead roots, which could
influence the results of HM analysis, were removed during sample preparation
The analysis of leachates, collected from control treatments and treatments with weekly additions of EDTA, suggested that EDTA mobilized heavy metals and caused significant leaching The dynamic of Pb,
Zn and Cd leaching is presented in Figure 2 The concentrations of Pb and Cd in leachates of control treatments were bellow the detection limits of instru-ment (0.4 mg L−1 and 0.025 mg L−1, respectively).
The amount of Zn leached was bellow 0.02 mg kg−1of
soil in all control treatments As expected, the water-ing regime and the amount of water applied had strong influence on HM leaching In columns watered with lesser amounts of water (regime A) a constant increase
of leachate HM concentration was observed during the experiment In regimes (B and C) with more abund-ant watering, the concentration of metals in leachate ceased to increase at the end of experiment, presum-ably because most of the metals had been leached by then The mass balance of HMs leached and extracted into the harvastable parts of plants is shown in Table 2
Thirty six and 40% of total applied EDTA was leached through the soil profile in columns with 5 and
10 mmol kg−1 of applied EDTA (weekly additions,
regime C), respectively (Figure 3)
Trang 5Figure 2 The influence of different watering regimes (A, B, C) on Pb, Zn and Cd leaching from soil in treatments with weekly additions of
5 and 10 mmol kg −1of EDTA during phytoextraction experiment The means of four replicates are presented, error bars represent standard deviation.
Figure 3 EDTA content in soil column leachate (watering regime
C) in response to 5 mmol kg −1weekly additions and to 10 mmol
kg −1weekly additions of EDTA The means of four replicates are
presented, error bars represent standard deviation.
Phytotoxicity
In all treatments where EDTA was applied, visual
symptoms (necrotic lesions on the leaves of Chinese cabbage) of HM or EDTA toxicity were observed The symptoms were more prominent on older leaves Single dose and weekly additions of 10 mmol kg−1
EDTA resulted in rapid senescence of the plant shoots and lowered the yield of cabbage biomass (Table 3) The growth of red clover in the bioassay exper-iment depended strongly on the substrate Both the number of plants developed (not shown) and total biomass of the shoots per pot (Figure 4) revealed a sig-nificant negative impact of EDTA treatment on growth
of test plants The effect was more pronounced in treatments where high EDTA amounts were added in single application
No mycorrhizal infection was found in plants growing in soil treated with 5 and 10 mmol kg−1
EDTA in a single addition If the same cumulative amount of EDTA was applied in sequential weekly additions, arbuscular mycorrhiza developed, but its
Trang 6Table 2 The mass balance of HMs in percentages of initial total HMs in soil HMs leached and extracted into the harvastable parts of plants
in treatments with weekly addition of EDTA and control treatments according to watering regimes A,B,C are shown Results are presented as means of four replicates ±s.d.
% Leached
% Extracted
ND not detected.
frequency (F%) was lower compared to the control
treatment Despite the negative influence of 3 mmol
kg−1 EDTA on the growth of red clover (Figure
4), heavy mycorrhizal infection was present in all
developed plants (Figure 4)
The effect of EDTA addition on soil microorganisms
Phospholipid and diglyceride fatty acids analyses
(PLFA and DGFA) were used to determine the
ef-fect of a single EDTA additions on soil microflora
at the end of phytoextraction experiment In total 50
different PLFAs were detected, and 27 of these were
identified PLFAs can be used to identify microbial
groups PLFAs used to indicate bacteria were (i15:0,
a15:0, 15:0, i16:0, i17:0, a17:0, cy17:0), PLFA used as
actinomycetes marker was 10Me-18:0 and PLFA used
as marker for fungi was 18:2w6,9 (Vestal and White,
1989)
Figure 4 Red clover (Trifolium pratense) shoot dry weight and
ar-buscular mycorrhizae frequency in response to the 3 mmol kg −1 single dose addition (EDTA/3S), 5 mmol kg −1single dose addition (EDTA/5S), 5 mmol kg −1weekly additions (EDTA/5W), 10 mmol
kg −1 single dose addition (EDTA/10S), 10 mmol kg−1 weekly additions (EDTA/10W) of EDTA and control soil with no EDTA addition Means of four replicates are presented, error bars represent standard error.
The major shifts in the structure of microbial com-munities as the result of different EDTA additions was
Trang 7Figure 5 The structure of microbial groups (bacterial, fungal and
actinomycetes) determined as mol% of PLFAs in soil treated with
different additions of EDTA The results are the means of two
replicates.
Figure 6 Stress index (trans/cis PLFA) of microbial
popula-tions and the ratio between dead and viable microbial biomass
(DGFA/PLFA) in soil treated with different additions of EDTA The
results are means of two replicates.
determined using marker PLFAs expressed as mol%
In total, these marker PLFAs represented 23–28% of
total PLFA The PLFAs representing fungi decreased
with increasing concentrations of EDTA in soil while
neither of the PLFA markers of bacteria or
actinomy-cetes changed significantly at higher doses of EDTA
(Figure 5) However, the changes of the PLFA
pat-tern does not give an absolute amount of biomass for
different groups, since conversion factors from the
mi-croorganism group to actual biomass are still not
avail-able Especially the share of fungal biomass, which is
dominant in most soils (Thorn, 1997) seemed to be
underrated in Figure 5 The ratio between dead and
vi-able biomass (DGFA/PLFA) increased dramatically in
soil treatments with higher EDTA concentration
(Fig-ure 6) The dead fungal biomass presumably accounts
for the increase of DGFA Also, the trans/cis ratio
Table 3 Chinese cabbage biomass yield in treatments with
dif-ferent EDTA additions Results are presented as means of four replicates ±s.d.
EDTA 3 mmol/kg, S 11.9 ±0.9a,b
EDTA 5 mmol/kg, S 11.2 ±1.6a,b,c
EDTA 5 mmol/kg, W 11.1 ±1.2a,b,c
a,b,cStatistically different treatments according to Tukey test,
P=0.05.
S, single dose addition of EDTA.
W, weekly additions of EDTA.
of PLFA increased at higher EDTA concentrations (Figure 6) The increased fatty acids trans/cis ratio is associated with starved or stressed microorganisms in natural environments (Guckert et al., 1986)
Discussion
The goal of successful phytoextraction is to reduce
HM levels in contaminated soil to acceptable levels within a reasonable time frame To achieve this, plants must accumulate high levels of HMs and produce high amounts of biomass Many hydroponic studies revealed that the uptake and translocation of HM in plants are enhanced by increasing HM concentration
in the nutrient solution (Huang et al., 1997) The bioavailability of HMs in the soil is, therefore, of para-mount importance for successful phytoremediation
Pb, as one of the most widespread metal pollutants in soil, has limited solubility in soil solution and bioavail-ability due to complexation with organic and inorganic soil colloides, sorption on oxides and clays and pre-cipitation as carbonates, hydroxides and phosphates (Ruby et al., 1999) Therefore, a successful phytore-mediation must include mobilization of HMs into the soil solution that is in direct contact with plant roots Results of our study indicated up to 104.6, 2.3 and 3.2-fold increase of Pb, Cd and Zn concentra-tion, respectively, in leaves of Chinese cabbage grown
on EDTA (10 mmol kg−1) treated soil No
statistic-ally significant difference in Cd and Zn plant uptake was observed when single dose and weekly 5 mmol
kg−1EDTA additions were compared (Figure 1) The
greater ability of EDTA to enhance Pb plant uptake above Zn and Cd and other HMs was also reported earlier (Blaylock et al., 1997) and appears to be related
Trang 8to the binding capacity of EDTA for different metals
Formation of Pb-EDTA complex is expected to be the
dominant metal-EDTA complex in most soils between
pH 5.2 and 7.7 (Sommers and Lindsay, 1979)
At higher doses (10 mmol kg−1 EDTA), a single
dose addition of chelate was much more effective than
weekly additions It seems that high concentrations
of EDTA caused desorption of less available species
of HMs which are more strongly bound to the soil
particles Interestingly, the concentration of Zn and
Cd in the roots of plants grown on EDTA treated soil
was lower than in the roots of plants grown on control
soil (Figure 1) However the concentration of Pb in
roots was not statistically significant lower compared
to control plants Lead retention in the roots is based
on Pb binding to ion exchangeable sites on the cell
wall and extracellular precipitation in the form of Pb
carbonate deposited in the cell walls (Cunningham et
al., 1995) Our observations only partially confirm that
EDTA effectively prevents cell wall retention of HM
and influenced not only HM uptake but also enhanced
HM translocation in the plant (Blaylock et al., 1997)
It is well documented that the primary target of HM
toxicity and in particular lead toxicity (Godbold, 1994)
is the root and not the shoot Hence, lower exposure of
roots to HM could be crucial for the plant performance
and consequently also for the successful remediation
process
The use of chelates as soil amendments to increase
the bioavailability of HM has raised some concern
over the potential increased mobility of the
metal-chelate complex in the soil Several authors have
emphasized the possibility of HM groundwater
con-tamination or other off site migrations (Copper et al.,
1999; Huang and Cunningham, 1996) While EDTA
and other chelates are commonly used additives for
remediation of HM contaminated soil in ex situ soil
washing techniques (Mark et al., 1998), no data on
EDTA promoted metal leaching during
phytoextrac-tion were found High concentraphytoextrac-tions of Pb, Zn and
Cd and EDTA found in soil column leachates
(Fig-ures 2 and 3) suggest high water solubility of Pb,
Zn and Cd-EDTA complexes These results suggest
that phytoextraction using chelates must be designed
properly to prevent migration of soluble HMs We
are currently investigating some managing practices to
accomplish this
In general, there is little known about the
im-pact of different phytoremediation practices on soil
microorganisms Recent studies with
hyperaccumu-lating plants revealed a great impact on the quantity
and species composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal propagules as well as on mycorrhiza function during long-term metal-remediation treatments (Pawlowska
et al., 2000) There is a great need to assess the poten-tial influence of phytoremediation on soil microflora, especially when organic chelators are applied
We designed a bioassay experiment with red clover
in order to evaluate the post treatment toxicity of soils used in the EDTA treatment experiment The ana-lysis of plant growth revealed a strong inhibitory effect
of EDTA on the Chinese cabbage (Table 3) and the red clover (Figure 4) Both direct adverse action of EDTA and the increased bioavailability of soil HMs could influence plant performance negatively Very high total and shoot HM concentrations were meas-ured in the treatments where the most adverse effects
of the EDTA were observed (10 mmol kg−1 EDTA).
Hence, it is possible that HMs were affecting physiolo-gical processes even in the above ground parts of the plants On the other hand, several studies suggest that the toxicity of different metals can also be mitigated
by EDTA binding (Postma et al., 2000; Sillanpaeae and Oikari, 1996) In our case, further experiments would help us to evaluate the adverse effects of HM and EDTA separately
Both the presence of EDTA and HMs could in-fluence the development of red clover arbuscular my-corrhiza as it is known that they can be the factors influencing photosynthetic activity of the host and car-bon allocation to the roots can mediate mycorrhizal association in terms of quantity (the rate of mycor-rhizal infection) and quality (physiological interac-tions between the symbionts) (Smith and Read, 1997) The adverse effects of HMs on the occurrence of ar-buscular mycorrhizal fungi, HM tolerance in these micro-organisms, and their effects on metal uptake and transfer to plants are well documented (Leyval et al., 1997) There is, however, very little information on the direct effects of EDTA on arbuscular mycorrhiza (Ez-awa et al., 1995) Although the results of mycorrhizal bioassay experiments vary with the use of different bait plants and environmental conditions, they provide
a relative measure of mycorrhizal fungus inoculum (Brundrett et al., 1996) In our experiment, the es-timation of the mycorrhizal colonization of red clover revealed a similar EDTA dose-dependent response of mycorrhizae as it was found for the plant growth (Figure 4) However, 3 mmol kg−1 EDTA treatment
did not negatively influence mycorrhiza formation al-though it strongly inhibited plant growth This sug-gests a higher sensitivity of plants to the presence of
Trang 9EDTA or bioavailable HMs compared to arbuscular
fungi More detailed studies would be needed to
con-firm this presumption and to evaluate the influence of
EDTA treatment on mycorrhizal development
The toxicity of EDTA on soil bacteria,
actinomy-cetes and fungi was studied with PLFA and DGFA
methods PLFA and DGFA are relatively new tools
in environmental microbiology and enable the insight
into the structure of microbial populations in complex
substrates, and give an indication of environmental
stress inflicted on microbial populations (Vestal and
White, 1989) The results are in accord with
phyto-toxicity and arbuscular mycorrhize tests Increasing
doses of EDTA increased the cultural stress (DGFA
analysis, trans/cis ratio of PLFA methyl esters) of
soil microflora (Figure 6) The PLFA results
indic-ated that soil fungi are more sensitive to EDTA or to
EDTA mediated increase of HMs bioavailability than
are soil bacteria and actinomycetes (Figure 5) This
can be partly explained by a very diverse bacterial
metabolism which enables bacterial species to adjust
to different environmental conditions Our data are
also in accord with results of Dahlin et al (1997) They
reported that the effect of HMs on the PLFA pattern
was small, except for 18:2u6 PLFA, which decreased
in sludge amended, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn
contamin-ated soil, compared to the control soil This specific
PLFA is an indicator the amount of fungi in the soil
(Frostegard et al., 1993)
Conclusion
The results of this study muddy the waters regarding
the possible use of EDTA for in situ phytoextraction
of HM contaminated soils The addition of EDTA
en-hanced accumulation of HMs in green parts of the test
plant However, EDTA addition also caused leaching
of Pb, Zn and Cd through the soil profile and had toxic
effects on test plants and soil microorganisms The
results, therefore, emphasize the importance of EDTA
risk assessment for each specific soil and
phytoextrac-tion condiphytoextrac-tions New non-toxic chelates, and methods
to prevent the leaching of the HMs-chelate complex
down the soil profile need to be evaluated
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Slovenian Ministry
for Science and Technology, grant No
J4-0694-0486-98 We thank Mr Klavdij Bajc, Mrs Zalka Ilc, Mrs
Ana Zorˇc for technical assistance and Dr Nataša J Vidic and Glenn S Jaecks, M Sc for correcting the English
References
Berti R, Cunningham S C and Cooper E M 1998 Case studies
in the field-in-place inactivation and phytorestoration of
Pb-contaminated sites In Metal-Contaminated Soils: In Situ
Inac-tivation and Phytorestoration Ed W R Berti, Cunningham S C and Copper E M pp 235–248 Landes Bioscience, Austin Blaylock M J, Salt D E, Dushenkov S, Zakharova O, Gussman C, Kapulnik Y, Ensley B D and Raskin I 1997 Enhanced accumu-lation of Pb in Indian mustard by soil-applied chelating agents Environ Sci Technol 31, 860–865.
Brundrett M, Bougher N, Dell B, Grove T and Malajczuk N 1996 Working with Mycorrhizas in Forestry and Agriculture ACAIR, Canberra, 374 p.
Cooper E M, Sims J T, Cunningham S D, Huang J W and Berti W R
1999 Chelate-assisted phytoextraction of lead from contaminated soils J Environ Qual 28, 1709–1719.
Council Directive 86/278/EEC 1986 On the Protection of the En-vironment, and In Particular of the Soil, When Sewage Sludge
is Used in Agriculture EC Official Journal L181, 4.7.1986, Brussels, 6 p.
Cunningham S C, Berti W R and Huang J W 1995 Phytoremediation
of contaminated soils TIBtech 13, 393–379.
Cunningham S C, Berti W R and Huang J W 1995 Remediation of
contaminated soils and sludges by green plants In
Bioremedi-ation of Inorganics Ed E Hinchee, J L Means and D Burris pp 33–54 Batelle Press, Columbus-Richland.
Dahlin S, Witter E, M´lrtensson A, Turner A and B´l´lth E 1997 Where’s the limit? Changes in the microbiological properties of agricultural soils at low levels of metal contamination Soil Biol Biochem 29, 1405–1415.
Dirilgen N 1998 Effects of pH and chelator EDTA on Cr toxicity
and accumulation in Lemma minor Chemosphere 37, 771–783.
Ezawa T, Saito M and Yoshida T 1995 Comparison of phosphatase localization in the intraracial hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal
fungi, Glomus spp and Gigaspora spp Plant and Soil 176, 57–
63.
Epstein A L, Gussman C D, Blaylock M J, Yermiyahu U, Huang J
W, Kapulnik Y, Orser C S 1999 EDTA and Pb-EDTA accumula-tion in Brassica juncea grown in Pb-amended soil Plant and Soil
208, 87–94.
Flathman P E and Lanza G R 1998 Phytoremediation: current views
on an emerging green technology J Soil Contamin 7, 415–432 Frostegard A and Bååth E 1996 The use of phospholipic fatty acid analysis to estimate bacterial and fungal biomass in soil Biol Fertil Soils 22, 59–65.
Frostegård A, Tunlid A and Bååth E 1991 Microbial biomass meas-ured as a total lipid phosphate in soils of different organic content J Microb Methods 14, 151–163.
Frostegård A, Tunlid A and Bååth E 1993 Phospholipid fatty acid composition, biomass, and activity of microbial communities from two soil types experimentally exposed to different heavy metals Appl Environ Microbiol 59, 3605–3617.
Godbold D L 1994 Aluminium and heavy metal stress: From the
rhizosphere to the whole plant In Effects of Acid Rain on Forest
Processes Ed D L Godbold and A Hütterman pp 232–264 Wiley-Liss, New York.
Trang 10Guckert J B, Hood m A and White D C 1986 Phospholipid
ester-linked fatty acid profile changes during nutrient deprivation of
Vibrio cholerae: increase in the trans/cis ratio and proportions of
cyclopropyl fatty acids Appl Environ Microbiol 52, 794–801.
Hamano T, Mitsuhashi Y, Kojima N and Aoki N 1993 Sensitive
spectrophotometric method for the determination of
ethylene-diaminetetraacetic acid in foods Analyst 118, 909–912.
Huang J W, Chen J, Berti W R and Cunningham S D 1997
Phytore-mediation of lead-contaminated soils: role of synthetic chelates
in lead phytoextraction Environ Sci Technol 3, 800–805.
Huang J W and Cunningham S D 1996 Lead phytoextraction:
spe-cies variation in lead uptake and translocation New Phytol 134,
75–84.
Leyval C, Turnau K and Haselwandter K 1997 Effects of heavy
metal pollution on mycorrhizal colonization and function:
physiological, ecological and applied aspects Mycorrhiza 7,
139–153.
Mark C S and Pichtel J 1998 Ex-situ remediation of a
metal-contaminated superfund soil using selective extractants J
En-viron Eng 124, 639–645.
Nörtemann B 1999 Biodegradation of EDTA Appl Microbiol.
Biotechnol 51, 751–759.
Pawlowska T E, Chaney R L, Chin M and Charvat I 2000 Effects
of metal phytoextraction practices on the indigenous community
of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi at a metal-contaminated landfill.
Appl Environ Microbiol 66, 2526–2530.
Phillips J M and Hayman D S 1970 Improved procedures for
clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular
mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection Trans Br.
Mycol Soc 55, 58–160.
Postma J W M, Keltjens W G, Nelemans J A and van Tintelen W
2000 Interaction of Al(-EDTA) with the plant root: Plant growth
and nutrient uptake Plant Physiol Biochem Suppl 38, 136–142.
Ringelberg D B, Sutton S and White D C 1997 Biomass,
bioactiv-ity and biodiversbioactiv-ity: microbial ecology of the deep subsurface:
analysis of ester-linked phospholipid fatty acids FEMS Microb.
Rev 20, 371–377.
Ruby M V, Schoof R, Brattin W, Goldade M, Post G, Harnois M,
Mosby D E, Casteel S W, Berti W, Carpenter M, Edwards D,
Cragin D and Chappell W 1999 Advances in evaluating the oral bioavailability of inorganics in soil for use in human health risk assessment Environ Sci Technol 32, 3697–3705.
Salt D E, Blaylock M, Kumar P B A N, Dushenkov V, Ensley B D, Chet I and Raskin I 1995 Phytoremediation: a novel strategy for the removal of toxic metals from the environment using plants Biotechnology 13, 468–474.
Sillanpaeae M and Oikari A 1996 Assessing the impact of com-plexation by EDTA and DTPA on heavy metal toxicity using Microtox bioassay Chemosphere 32, 1485–1497.
Smith S E and Read D J 1997 Mycorrhizal Symbiosis Academic Press, San Diego, London, 605 p.
Sommers L E and Lindsay W L 1979 Effect of pH and redox on predicted heavy metal-chelate equilibria in soils Soil Sci Soc.
Am J 43, 39–47.
Steele M C and Pichtel J 1998 Ex-situ remediation of metal
contam-inated superfund soil using selective extractants J Environ Eng.
124, 639–645.
Thorn G 1997 The Fungi in Soil In Modern soil microbiology Eds.
J D Elsas, J T Trevors and E M H Wellington pp 63–127 Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York.
Trouvelot A, Kongh J L and Gianinazzi-Pearson V 1986 Measure
du taux de mycorrhization d’un systeme radiculaire Recherche
de methods d’estimation ayant une signification fonctionelle.
In Physiological and Genetical Aspects of Mycorhizae Eds V
Gianinazzi-Pearson and S Gianinazzi pp 217–221 INRA, Dijon Vestal J R and White D C 1989 Lipid analysis and microbial ecology BioSci 39, 535–541.
White D C, Flemming C A, Leung K T and Macnaughton S J 1998
In situ microbial ecology for quantitative appraisal, monitoring
and risk assessment of pollution remediation in soils, the sub-surface, the rhizosphere and in biofilms J Microb Meth 32, 93–105.
Xian X 1989 Effect of chemical forms of cadmium, zinc, and lead in polluted soils on their uptake by cabbage plants Plant Soil 113, 257–264.
Section editor: P Ryan