Although the crystallinity of pure cellulosic Avicel plays a major role in determining the rate of hydrolysis by cellulases from Trichoderma reesei, we show that it stays constant during
Trang 1hydrolysis rate
Me´lanie Hall, Prabuddha Bansal, Jay H Lee, Matthew J Realff and Andreas S Bommarius
School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
Introduction
The enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose has
received increased interest over the last 10 years,
and growing demand for economically sustainable
biofuels indicates an urgent need for reducing the
costs associated with their production Cellulose,
a polysaccharide made by most plants, is one of the
most abundant organic compounds on Earth and
represents a major potential feedstock for the biofuels
industry However, the current enzymatic degradation
of cellulose faces major issues that prevent its wide
utilization in the production of economically
competi-tive biofuels [1–4]
Cellulose is hydrolyzed to glucose via the synergistic
action of several enzymes Endoglucanases (EC 3.2.1.4)
break down cellulose chains at random positions within the chains, whereas exoglucanases (i.e cello-biohydrolases, EC 3.2.1.91) cleave off cellobiose speci-fically from the chain ends in a processive manner [5–10] Cellobiose is subsequently converted into glucose
by b-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.21) [7,11–14] The exo-endo synergism is easily expained by the fact that endo-glucanases provide more chain ends for cellobiohydro-lases to act upon [15–19] The hydrolysis of insoluble, solid cellulose is a heterogeneous reaction, which does not match the assumptions of kinetic models based on Michaelis–Menten kinetics [13,14,20] After an initial phase of adsorption of cellulases on cellulose, which is fast compared to hydrolysis [16,21–26], the enzymes
Keywords
Cel7A; cellulases; cellulose crystallinity;
hydrolysis; Trichoderma reesei
Correspondence
A Bommarius, School of Chemical and
Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute
of Technology, 311 Ferst Drive, Atlanta,
GA 30332-0100, USA
Fax: +1 404 894 2291
Tel: +1 404 385 1334
E-mail: andreas.bommarius@chbe.gatech.edu
(Received 13 December 2009, revised 16
January 2010, accepted 18 January 2010)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07585.x
The enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose encounters various limitations that are both substrate- and enzyme-related Although the crystallinity of pure cellulosic Avicel plays a major role in determining the rate of hydrolysis by cellulases from Trichoderma reesei, we show that it stays constant during enzymatic conversion The mode of action of cellulases was investigated by studying their kinetics on cellulose samples A convenient method for reaching intermediate degrees of crystallinity with Avicel was therefore developed and the initial rate of the cellulase-catalyzed hydrolysis of cellu-lose was demonstrated to be linearly proportional to the crystallinity index
of Avicel Despite correlation with the adsorption capacity of cellulases onto cellulose, at a given enzyme loading, the initial enzymatic rate contin-ued to increase with a decreasing crystallinity index, even though the bound enzyme concentration stayed constant This finding supports the determinant role of crystallinity rather than adsorption on the enzymatic rate Thus, the cellulase activity and initial rate data obtained from various samples may provide valuable information about the details of the mecha-nistic action of cellulase and the hydrolysable⁄ reactive fractions of cellulose chains X-ray diffraction provides insight into the mode of action of Cel7A from T reesei In the conversion of cellulose, the (021) face of the cellulose crystal was shown to be preferentially attacked by Cel7A from T reesei
Abbreviations
CP ⁄ MAS, cross polarization ⁄ magic angle spinning; CrI, crystallinity index; DNS, dinitrosalicylic acid; PASC, phosphoric acid swollen cellulose.
Trang 2cleave off cellobiose and move along the same chain,
hydrolyzing glycosidic bonds until an event occurs that
terminates cleavage As the reaction proceeds to
inter-mediate degrees of conversion, the rate of the reaction
decreases dramatically, and the final part of cellulose
hydrolysis requires an inordinate fraction of the overall
total reaction time [27,28] Several factors, both
substrate- and enzyme-related, are suggested to be
responsible for this slowdown of the reaction rate but,
so far, no mechanistic explanation of the slowdown
has been validated The substrate characteristics
often implied in the slowdown of the reaction rate
include surface area, porosity, the degree of
poly-merization, crystallinity, and the overall composition
(complex substrates such as lignocellulosics versus
pure cellulose) For enzyme-related features,
deactiva-tion, inhibideactiva-tion, jamming, clogging and imperfect
processivity are often cited as causes of the slowdown
[14,29,30]
One of the most controversial theories concerns the
influence of crystallinity and the change of the degree
of crystallinity during enzymatic hydrolysis It is
accepted that the initial degree of crystallinity of
cellu-lose plays a major role as a rate determinant in the
hydrolysis reaction A completely amorphous sample is
hydrolyzed much faster than a partially crystalline
cellulose [14,31–33], which has led to the idea that
amorphous domains in a partially crystalline cellulose
sample are hydrolyzed first, leaving crystalline parts to
be hydrolyzed at the end, thus resulting in an increased
crystallinity index (CrI) and explaining the dramatic
drop in rate at higher degrees of conversion [34]
Studies to (dis)prove this phenomenon have differed
in the analytical methods employed (X-ray diffraction
versus solid state 13C-NMR), the nature of the
sub-strate used (complex lignocellulosics versus pure
cellu-lose) and the source of the hydrolytic enzymes (mostly
from Trichoderma reesei and other fungal strains) [35]
Several reviews have stated that it is difficult to
con-clude that crystallinity is a key determinant of the rate
of enzymatic hydrolysis [13,14,29] Although a
correla-tion between crystallinity and enzymatic hydrolysis
rate has already been demonstrated, controversy
remains [29] Usually, different types of cellulose with
different degrees of crystallinity are employed in these
studies, such as cotton, cotton linter, Avicel, filter
paper or bacterial cellulose [15,17,36,37] Their
cellu-lase-catalyzed degradation lead to hydrolysis rates that
were directly related to the CrI of the cellulose sample
[17,31,37–39] To correctly relate the CrI with
hydro-lysis rate, it is of prime importance to study samples
that have the same basic composition and provenance
For this reason, pure cellulose may be preferable to
complex substrates because the presence of lignin or hemicellulose may interfere with the action of cellulase and reduce accessibility, and therefore the hydrolysis rates [29,40,41]
Another important criterion related to hydrolysis rate involves the adsorption capacity of cellulases onto cellulose The rate of hydrolysis was shown to be pro-portional to the amount of adsorbed enzymes [22,25,42–44] Additionally, the difference in reactivity between a crystalline and an amorphous cellulose was found to be related to the adsorption capacity of endo-glucanases on both types of substrate [45] Further-more, the degree of crystallinity of cellulose influences adsorption at a given protein loading and the maxi-mum adsorption constant was shown to be greatly enhanced at low crystallinity indices [46] The same study concluded that the effective binding was the lim-iting parameter with respect to the hydrolysis rate in the case of cellulose with low degrees of crystallinity, despite a high adsorption constant
Amorphous cellulose has been widely used to inves-tigate cellulase activity [35,47–51] Treatment with 85% phosphoric acid to produce phosphoric acid swol-len cellulose (PASC) results in complete dissolution of the sample [52] and such treatment was shown to have
no impact on the reducing-end concentration of the cellulose sample (i.e its degree of polymerization) [53,54] However, the effect of various phosphoric acid concentrations has only been investigated across a nar-row range of acid concentrations or mainly at low con-centrations [46,55–57] Recently, Zhang et al [52] demonstrated that the concentration of phosphoric acid used to generate swollen cellulose relates to the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis by controlling the state of cellulose solubilization Hydrolysis rates were one order of magnitude lower for microcrystalline cellulose compared to amorphous cellulose This reflects the composition of highly crystalline and amorphous cellu-lose at acid concentrations of 0% and above 81%, respectively The changes in hydrolysis rate, with varia-tions in the degree of crystallinity as a result of treat-ment with various phosphoric acid concentrated solutions, are therefore of significant interest
The present study aimed to determine the role of crystallinity and adsorption in the susceptibility of cellulose to enzymatic degradation Both 13C-NMR solid-state spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography were applied to investigate the crystallinity of pure cellulose (Avicel) at different degrees of conversion by cellulases from T reesei, the most commonly studied cellulase-producing organism Complementarily, we generated cellulose (Avicel) with controlled degrees of crystallinity using phosphoric acid solutions of precisely
Trang 3calibrated concentration These pretreated cellulose
samples were employed to investigate and elucidate the
relationship between the degree of crystallinity,
adsorp-tion and the enzymatic hydrolysis rates
Results
Cellulase hydrolysis rate and cellulose
crystallinity
Various types of (ligno)cellulosic substrate are employed
in current enzymatic hydrolysis studies and thus are
a source of discrepancies in the results obtained and
the potential confusion regarding the challenging
problem of understanding the mode of action of
cellu-lase [35] The presence of hemicellulose, and especially
lignin, a strong adsorbent on cellulase, in
lignocellulo-sics, interferes with the enzymatic activity of cellulases
on cellulose [14,29,41] To avoid such interference, we
used Avicel, a commonly used, commercially and
reproducibly obtainable pure cellulose substrate with a
well-characterized structure and an average degree
of crystallinity of 60% (measured via solid state
13C-NMR)
Phosphoric acid pretreatment
First, to validate the efficiency of the phosphoric acid
pretreatment, acid-pretreated samples were hydrolyzed
with cellulases and an excess of b-glucosidase to remove
product inhibition and fully convert cellobiose to
glu-cose, and the initial hydrolysis rates were calculated in
terms of the production of glucose after a 2 min
reac-tion time As expected, the more concentrated the
phos-phoric acid solution, the higher the sugar production
(Fig 1A), so that the pretreatment procedure was
con-sidered to be efficient Samples treated with pure
phos-phoric acid solution (maximum 85%) resulted in
amorphous cellulose as demonstrated by X-ray
diffrac-tion analysis [58] (Fig 2) Furthermore, a high amount
of glucose (4.75 gÆL)1Æmin)1) was produced from the
cellulose sample pretreated with the highest
concentra-tion of acid (85%), and all of the Avicel was converted
within 2.5 h compared to the 96 h that was necessary
for untreated Avicel (data not shown)
Phosphoric acid pretreatment has been used to create
cellulose samples of various surface areas and this
parameter was found to be related to the enzymatic rate
[51] A recent study using phosphoric acid to increase
cellulose accessibility in lignocellulosics suggested the
presence of a critical point in the phosphoric acid
con-centration below which enzymatic hydrolysis was slow,
and above which cellulose was easily dissolved [59] The
results obtained in the present study (Fig 1) confirm that there is a steep change in reactivity (i.e glucose
A
B
C
Fig 1 Effect of phosphoric acid concentration on: (A) initial rate of Avicel enzymatic hydrolysis (glucose produced in the first 2 min of the reaction with cellulases); (B) CrI obtained from X-ray diffraction data and multivariate statistical analysis; (C) moisture content of cellulose samples after treatment with phosphoric acid (measure-ment performed after tightly controlled filtration and subsequent drying at 60 C) The results shown are the average of at least triplicates (duplicates for crystallinity).
Trang 4production) from 1 to 4.75 gÆL)1Æmin)1(Fig 1A) over a
narrow range of phosphoric acid content (75–80%),
and not as a step change but as a steep continuum No
further increase was observed in the range 80–85%,
which is the maximum possible phosphoric acid
con-centration, close to the 81% obtained by Moxley et al
[59] for maximum glucan digestibility Below 75%, the
glucose production rate tends to level off, with a
mini-mum being obtained with untreated Avicel (0.6 gÆL)1Æ
min)1glucose at 0% phosphoric acid)
There are several ways to measure cellulose CrI
One of the most commonly employed techniques is
X-ray diffraction where the peak height is used to
calculate the CrI [60] (Fig 2) However, the major
drawback of this analytical method stems from the
formula itself (see Materials and methods) because it
implies that amorphous cellulose gives a main
reflec-tion at 2h = 18, which, upon our analysis, is
defi-nitely not the case for the Avicel used in the present
study (rather, it is shifted to higher angle, 19.5)
Also, the absolute values thus obtained are extremely
high (> 90% for Avicel), which does not appear to
represent the structure of Avicel well, and deviates
substantially from the NMR analysis (60% for Avicel)
In addition, the literature contains a wide range of
reported values for Avicel using X-ray diffraction, in
the range 62–87.6% using the peak height method
[61–63], and from 39 to 75.3% using various other
methods [61,64,65] It should be noted, however, that different drying methods are often being employed, which also may add to the reported variations in absolute crystallinity values Under our conditions, no satisfactory resolution of the C4 carbon signals in NMR analysis could be obtained below a certain degree of crystallinity and within a reasonable acquisi-tion time, so that X-ray diffracacquisi-tion was used as an alternative to map the full crystallinity spectrum Given the drawbacks of the peak intensity method [60,66,67], we have developed a new method to obtain consistent CrI values using multivariate statistical analysis applied to X-ray diffraction spectra [58] Figure 1B shows that the CrI closely tracks the breakthrough behavior of reactivity (Fig 1A) when employing the same amount of phosphoric acid that was used to pretreat the cellulose sample: the degree of crystallinity remains fairly unchanged at approximately 55–60% over a wide range of phosphoric acid concen-trations but decreases linearly to almost 0% in a con-centration range of 75–80% phosphoric acid Thus, the phosphoric acid effect is clearly evident: not only is
it related to dissolution capacity [59], but also it dis-rupts the crystalline structure of cellulose and can turn partially crystalline cellulose amorphous Avicel, a mi-crocrystalline type of cellulose, has a mixed composi-tion (amorphous and crystalline) and the results obtained in the present study suggest that the more concentrated the acid solution, the more crystalline regions are turned amorphous The capacity of cellu-lose samples to retain water relative to the proportion
of amorphous parts has been postulated [68,69], and was verified with the acid-treated samples Figure 1C shows the tight relationship between moisture content and acid concentration, supporting the conclusion with respect to structural changes derived from crystallinity measurement occurring in the 75–80% acid tion range Upon treatment at higher acid concentra-tions, cellulose samples have a higher capacity to retain water, owing to the higher number of hydroxyl groups that are available to bind to (and adsorb) water molecules because these hydroxyl groups are no longer hydrogen bonded to other glucose moieties A cellulose sample with 85% moisture content can theoretically accommodate 49 water molecules per glucose unit, whereas, at a 60% moisture content, this ratio is reduced to 13 (based on the observation that 1 g of Avicel yields 1.15 g of glucose at 100% conversion)
Cellulose enzymatic hydrolysis There have been numerous, and sometimes controver-sial, studies on the change of cellulose crystallinity
Iam
I002
Fig 2 X-ray diffraction pattern of microcrystalline cellulose Avicel
(multiple peaks) and amorphous Avicel (single smooth peak)
gener-ated with 85% phosphoric acid (reflection around 20 is attributed
to amorphous parts and gives a CrI of 0% based on peak intensity
method) [60] x-axis: Bragg angle (2h) I 002 represents the maximum
intensity at 2h = 22.5, I am shows the minimum intensity at
2h = 18 used to calculate crystallinity in the peak height method,
and the straight line represents the background (see Materials and
methods).
Trang 5upon enzymatic hydrolysis Both trends (i.e increased
degree of crystallinity over conversion and no change
over conversion) were observed at different levels of
intensity [14,31,33,70,71] As mentioned above, the
dif-ferent types of substrate as well as the analytical
meth-ods employed contributed to the absence of a clear
understanding of the mechanistic action of cellulase on
partially crystalline cellulose Furthermore, in situ
measurements of cellulose structure under reacting
conditions (i.e in aqueous buffers) are difficult to
perform because all current methods require the prior
isolation of cellulose and drying [29]
The CrI of Avicel was monitored via X-ray
diffrac-tion during its hydrolysis by a commercial mixture of
cellulases from T reesei and an excess of b-glucosidase
to prevent cellobiose inhibition The X-ray diffraction
data obtained gave an artificially high degree of
crys-tallinity for untreated Avicel (92%) using the method
of Segal et al [60] Small variations at such high values
are challenging to monitor; therefore, cross
polariza-tion⁄ magic angle spinning (CP ⁄ MAS) 13C-NMR
spec-troscopy was employed as an alternate method The
CrI of untreated Avicel (calculated as described
previ-ously) [28] averaged 61% and was found to be
constant over the course of hydrolysis, until
approximately 90% conversion (Fig 3) Similarly,
using purified Cel7A from T reesei (see Materials and
methods) instead of a mixture of cellulases, no change
in crystallinity was observed; however, variations in
relative peak intensity in X-ray diffraction patterns
showed that Cel7A attacked preferentially the (021)
plane of the crystal because the peak corresponding to
this face (centered around 21) disappeared after 20% conversion (Fig 4) Overall, peak intensity ratios for the other peaks were conserved [planes (101), (101), (002) and (040) at 15, 16, 22.5 and 35, respectively] The same trend was observed with the commercial cellulase mixture, implying no competition for this plane from the other enzymes (endoglucanases, Cel6A and b-glucosidase) or any dominant behavior from Cel7A The implications of this preferential attack need to be investigated further because this may provide options for engineering Cel7A and thus enable overall faster hydrolysis
Adsorption Adsorption studies were conducted using cellulose samples generated with various amounts of phosphoric acid and thus displaying intermediate degrees of crys-tallinity (Fig 1B) Adsorption experiments were car-ried out at 4C to prevent the hydrolysis of cellulose and the resulting loss of adsorbent material that would ultimately bias the results Furthermore, the adsorp-tion profile at 4C was found to be similar to that at
50C after 30 min [46] The adsorption step has been shown to be rapid, with half of the maximally adsorbed enzyme being bound with 1–2 min and the adsorption equilibrium being reached after 30 min [22] Adsorption experiments were first performed using the same degree of loading as employed during a com-mon enzymatic hydrolysis run (175 lgÆmg)1 cellulose; Figs 1–3) Surprisingly, a maximum value of adsorbed enzyme concentration (150 lgÆmg)1 cellulose) was reached for the cellulose samples with a CrI below a threshold value of approximately 45% (Fig 6A, open triangles), whereas the amount of adsorbed enzyme
Fig 3 CrI of Avicel monitored during hydrolysis with cellulases via
CP ⁄ MAS 13 C-NMR [reactions were run at 50 C in sodium acetate
buffer (50 m M , pH 5) at 20 gÆL)1Avicel with the addition of
b-gluco-sidase (15 kUÆL)1) and cellulases (24 mLÆL)1, 3.4 gÆL)1 total
protein)] The results shown are the average of duplicates.
Fig 4 X-ray diffraction patterns of untreated Avicel and partially converted cellulose in the range 10–40 (2h) x-axis: Bragg angle (2h) The reflection of face (021) of the crystal (centered around 21) is visible only for untreated Avicel.
Trang 6appeared to increase inversely and linearly with the
CrI at higher crystallinity values (i.e > 45%) A
con-stant amount of adsorbed enzymes ( 150 lgÆmg)1
cellulose) led to faster hydrolysis at lower degrees of
crystallinity (i.e < 45% CrI; Fig 6B), whereas, at
crystallinity indices above 45%, the adsorption
capac-ity increased and was linearly proportional to the
initial rate
At higher enzyme loading (seven-fold greater than
the original loading; i.e 1230 lgÆmg)1 cellulose), the
initial rates were found to be generally higher
(Fig 6C, filled circles), confirming the findings
obtained in previous studies [22,25,42–44], although
this trend was especially true at lower degrees of
crys-tallinity By contrast, untreated Avicel (CrI = 60%)
displayed similar rates at both enzyme concentrations,
and little difference in rate for the two enzyme
con-centrations was observed up to a CrI of 50% Also
at high enzyme loading, the profile of adsorbed
enzyme versus the degree of crystallinity⁄ initial rate
was similar to that at low enzyme loading, except
that constant adsorption was observed only for CrI
in the range 0–35%
Discussion
Cellulase hydrolysis rate and cellulose crystallinity
The correlation between the CrI and the initial
hydro-lysis rate (Fig 5) shows a continuous decrease in
rate as crystallinity increases At higher degrees of
crystallinity, cellulose samples are less amenable to
enzymatic hydrolysis, less reactive and less accessible
A
B
C
Fig 6 Adsorption, CrI and initial rates at two cellulases loadings:
D, 175 lgÆmg)1 cellulose; •, 1230 lgÆmg)1 cellulose Initial rates correspond to the amount of glucose produced over a 2 min reac-tion (20 mgÆmL)1 cellulose, cellulases at 175 resp 1230 lgÆmg)1 cellulose and an excess of b-glucosidase, 50 C) Adsorption stud-ies were conducted at 4 C over 30 min (A) Adsorption versus CrI; (B) initial rate versus adsorption; (C) initial rate versus CrI, where the grey shaded area represents the importance and role of adsorp-tion on enzymatic rate Dotted lines are added for clarity to help identify trends The results shown are the average of quadrupli-cates.
Fig 5 Effect of crystallinity (obtained from X-ray diffraction data and
multivariate statistical analysis) on the initial rate in Avicel enzymatic
hydrolysis (glucose produced in the first 2 min of the reaction with
cellulases) The results shown are the average of quadruplicates.
Trang 7The latter is supported by the data obtained from
moisture content measurement (Fig 1C) Most
aque-ous reagents can only penetrate the amorphaque-ous parts
of cellulose; therefore, these domains are also termed
the accessible regions of cellulose, and crystallinity and
accessibility are closely related [68] It is likely that
crystallinity and accessibility are related; however,
moisture content (i.e the capacity to retain water) by
itself is not directly related to enzyme accessibility
because water molecules are three orders of magnitude
smaller than cellulases [72] A highly crystalline
cellu-lose sample has a tight structure with cellucellu-lose chains
closely bound to each other, leaving too little space for
enzymes to initiate the hydrolysis process anywhere
within the cellulose crystal
Overall, the hydrolysis rate versus the phosphoric
acid concentration profile resembles a very steep and
sharp sigmoid curve (Fig 1A), which led to an
evalua-tion of the concentraevalua-tion range corresponding to the
sigmoid region In their review, Zhang et al [35]
stressed that the CrI of cellulose was not strongly
asso-ciated with hydrolysis rates By contrast, the results
obtained in the present study show a very close and
lin-ear relationship between the CrI and initial hydrolysis
rate for samples of same origin obtained after
pretreat-ment with phosphoric acid (R2= 0.96; Fig 5),
demon-strating that crystallinity is a good predictor of the
hydrolysis rate More precisely, in a phosphoric acid
concentration range of 75–80%, the hydrolysis rate,
crystallinity and phosphoric acid concentration are
mutually dependent parameters resulting from the
structural changes that take place upon acid
pretreat-ment of cellulose and are also linearly related The
degree of phosphoric acid addition enables the tight
control of the overall structure of cellulose in the Avicel
sample This convenient method for reaching
intermedi-ate degrees of crystallinity allows the exclusion of
addi-tional parameters that might influence the enzymatic
action on cellulose, such as the type and source of
cellu-lose or mixed components, and yields an explicit proof
of the tight relationship between initial cellulose
crystal-linity and the rate of degradation by cellulases from
T reesei The use of this method could support kinetics
studies where the estimation of intrinsic parameters for
cellulose is needed Furthermore, because the
interpre-tation of crystallinity data is not trivial, looking at
initial hydrolysis rates may be an elegant alternative to
estimating the degree of crystallinity of pure cellulose
No significant change was observed in the degree of
crystallinity during the enzymatic hydrolysis of Avicel
up to 90% conversion (Fig 3) Despite their ability to
distinguish different degrees of crystallinity, cellulases
are not efficient at reducing⁄ disrupting overall cellulose
crystallinity, most likely because cellulose chains are hydrolyzed as soon as their interactions with the crys-tal are disrupted, therefore leaving an overall unchanged crystallinity but a structure that is reduced
in size
Thus, the belief that mixed cellulose samples have their amorphous components hydrolyzed first is not consistent with the results obtained in the present study The change in crystallinity cannot account for the sharp decrease in reaction rate observed, and thus another explanation is required for the slowdown
A number of studies reporting an increasing crystal-linity along enzymatic hydrolysis have attributed the slowdown in the rate to this crystallinity change [25,33,34,39,71] However, the changes reported were often modest Figure 3 shows that a 10% increase in CrI at high CrI values leads to a 40% decrease in ini-tial rate; therefore, it does not appear physically possi-ble that a change in CrI by some percentage points results in such dramatic drops in the rate Constant crystallinity and decreased rates indicate surface changes on cellulose that start rapidly after the begin-ning of hydrolysis Factors other than crystallinity impeding enzymatic action (both enzyme- and sub-strate-related) require closer attention
Adsorption There are multiple substrate-related factors that can influence the reaction rate in the enzymatic hydrolysis
of cellulose (see Introduction) From the results obtained in the present study with respect to determin-ing the role of crystallinity in enzymatic activity, it is logical to ask whether crystallinity might not be mask-ing another phenomenon, specifically adsorption
A constant adsorption profile at different enzyme concentrations was found to relate to increasing hydro-lysis rates at decreasing degrees of crystallinity (Fig 6) and supports our previous conclusion This is in contrast to studies stating that increased hydrolysis rates were likely the result of an increasing adsorptive capacity rather than substrate reactivity [14] The observed phenomenon is most likely the result of a difference in the amount of productively bound enzyme and the percentage of surface coverage Indeed, at low degrees of crystallinity, adsorbed enzymes are more active at the same overall concentration (i.e initial rates are higher; Fig 6C), most likely because of a more open cellulose structure that prevents enzyme molecules residing on neighboring chains from hindering one another [73] At a very low CrI and constant adsorbed enzyme concentration, the percentage of surface cover-age is smaller because the surface area is larger at
Trang 8lower crystallinity indices [14] Exoglucanases may also
locate a chain end faster on an open structure and thus
be able to start hydrolysis immediately after binding
(initial rates were determined after only a 2 min
reac-tion time) Accessibility was suggested to be an
impor-tant factor that affects enzymatic hydrolysis rates [72]
and its increase at lower degrees of crystallinity was
proposed as a reason for enhanced digestibility [59] It
has also been suggested that rendering the substrate
more amorphous increases access to the reducing ends
of cellulose, thus enhancing reaction rates [53] These
data support these hypotheses only partially and,
importantly, demonstrate that the effect of improved
access on the hydrolysis rate is limited to higher
degrees of crystallinity, whereas, at low degrees of
crystallinity, rate enhancement is strictly the result of a
dynamic cause that is independent of the adsorption
phase (favored enzymatic motion as result of the larger
free space available at lower degrees of crystallinity),
and is also directly related to the enzyme
concentra-tion This can be related to recent work demonstrating
that the overcrowding of enzymes on the cellulose
surface lowers their activity [74] Surface area may also
play a role in the various rate profiles observed Some
studies have focused on the relationships between
surface area and crystallinity [75]; overall, a reduction
in crystallinity would relate to a higher surface area
In the present study, this would easily explain the
higher adsorption capacity observed at lower degrees
of crystallinity but not why the adsorption reaches a
plateau (in an undersaturated regime) below a certain
CrI and the rates keep increasing Also, the internal
surface of highly crystalline cellulose is poorly
acces-sible to enzymes, leading to such low adsorption,
pos-sibly in contrast to more amorphous samples An
accessible surface area has been the subject of
numer-ous studies [40] but, in view of the results obtained in
the present study, this does not appear to be the only
critical parameter with respect to controlling
hydro-lysis rates
Avicel hydrolysis rates were not significantly
chan-ged upon the addition of a much higher enzyme
con-centration for samples displaying a degree of
crystallinity in the range 60–50% (Fig 6C),
demon-strating that all hydrolysable fractions of cellulose were
already covered by enzymes at lower loading, despite
an increase in the amount of adsorbed cellulase at
higher loading High enzyme loading (1230 lgÆmg)1
cellulose) resulted in saturation of the Avicel surface,
whereas low enzyme loading (175 lgÆmg)1 cellulose)
led to less than full but more than half-saturation
(adsorption isotherms not shown) In other words,
a higher cellulose surface coverage (in an undersaturated
regime) does not necessarily lead to higher rates because it might simply result in unproductive binding once all of the hydrolysable fractions are covered The role of adsorption for a given cellulose sample appears
to be more important to the enzymatic rate at lower degrees of crystallinity (Fig 6C)
At higher enzyme loading, crystallinity appears to play a minor role (Fig 6A) At degrees of crystallinity
in the range 60–35%, the amount of adsorbed enzyme increases linearly, whereas adsorption is constant below
a breakpoint that can be estimated at approximately 35% CrI (compared to 45% at lower enzyme loading) Below 35% CrI, a maximum of absorbed cellulases was reached ( 600 lgÆmg)1 cellulose), whereas the initial rates were still increasing (Fig 6) The breakpoint below which crystallinity is the only determining factor for the reaction rate is expected to decrease as enzyme loading increases because it becomes comparatively harder to attain the maximum adsorption capacity (saturation) at low degrees of crystallinity (open cellulose structure) as well as the maximum coverage of hydrolysable fractions (investigations underway) Examining various enzyme concentrations and hydrolysis rate⁄ adsorption profiles
on substrates with different degrees of crystallinity may thus provide an effective way of quantifying cellulose hydrolyzability
Finally, future trends for the application of cellu-lases in biofuel technology should focus on efficient ways of disrupting cellulose crystallinity and thus render the overall process economically more viable by reducing the time required to reach full conversion
Materials and methods
Materials All chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma (St Louis, MO, USA) unless otherwise stated Avicel PH-101, cellulases from T reesei (159 FPUÆmL)1) and b-glucosidase (from almonds, 5.2 UÆmg)1) were obtained from Sigma and phosphoric acid (85%) was obtained from EMD (Gibbs-town, NJ, USA) Trichoderma reesei QM9414 strain was obtained from ATCC (#26921; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) The BCA protein assay kit was obtained from Thermo Fischer Scientific (Rockford,
IL, USA)
Phosphoric acid pretreatment One gram of slightly moistened Avicel was added to 30 mL of
an ice-cold aqueous phosphoric acid solution (concentration range 42–85% weight) and allowed to react over 40 min with occasional stirring After the addition of 20 mL of ice-cold
Trang 9acetone and subsequent stirring, the resulting slurry was
filtered over a fritted filtered-funnel and washed three times
with 20 mL of ice-cold acetone, and four times with 100 mL
of water The resulting cellulose obtained after the last
filtration was used as such in the enzymatic hydrolysis
experiments, and the moisture content was estimated upon
oven-drying at 60C overnight Samples were freeze-dried
prior to X-ray diffraction measurement
Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose
A suspension of Avicel (20 gÆL)1) in sodium acetate buffer
(1 mL, 50 mm, pH 5) was hydrated for 1 h with stirring
at 50C b-Glucosidase (15 kUÆL)1) and cellulases
(24 mLÆL)1, 3.4 gÆL)1 total protein) were added and the
mixture was stirred at 50C At the desired time points,
samples were centrifuged, and glucose content in the
super-natant was measured via the dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS)
assay For crystallinity measurements at various conversion
levels using CP⁄ MAS 13
C- NMR [and the corresponding Eqn (2)], reactions were run on a 15 mL scale (one reaction
tube per time point, ranging from 10 min to 92 h) and,
after centrifugation and washing with buffer and water,
recovered cellulose was either freeze-dried, oven-dried
(60C) or air-dried When Cel7A was used as single
cellu-lase component, 92 lg of purified enzyme per mg of Avicel
were added to the reaction mixture
Determination of glucose content
Glucose released from cellulose was measured using the
DNS assay, as described previously [28] The calibration
curve was generated with pure glucose standards DNS
assay was compared with HPLC analysis and found to
yield identical conversion results
Determination of the degree of crystallinity of
cellulose
X-ray diffraction
X-ray diffraction patterns of cellulose samples obtained
after freeze-drying were recorded with an X’Pert PRO
X-ray diffractometer (PANanalytical BV, Almelo, the
Netherlands) at room temperature from 10 to 60C, using
Cu⁄ Ka1irradiation (1.54 A˚) at 45 kV and 40 mA The scan
speed was 0.021425Æs)1with a step size of 0.0167 CrI was
calculated using the peak intensity method [60]:
CrI¼ ðI002 IamÞ=I002 100 ð1Þ
where I002 is the intensity of the peak at 2h = 22.5 and
Iam is the minimum intensity corresponding to the
amor-phous content at 2h = 18
Freeze-drying showed no impact on the crystallinity of
untreated Avicel
Solid state13C-NMR The solid-state CP⁄ MAS 13
C-NMR experiments were per-formed on a Bruker Avance⁄ DSX-400 spectrometer (Bruker Instuments, Inc., Bellerica, MA, USA) operating at frequencies of 100.55 MHz for 13C All the experiments were carried out at ambient temperature using a Bruker 4-mm MAS probe The samples (35% moisture content) were packed in 4 mm zirconium dioxide rotors and spun at
10 kHz Acquisition was carried out with a CP pulse sequence using a 5 ls pulse and a 2.0 ms contact pulse over
4 h CrI was calculated according to standard methods [28]: CrI¼ A8692 p:p:m:=ðA7986 p:p:m:þ A8692 p:p:m:Þ 100 ð2Þ where A86–92 p.p.m.and A79–86 p.p.m.are the areas of the crys-talline and amorphous C4 carbon signal of cellulose, respectively
Oven-drying (60C) showed no impact on the crystallin-ity of untreated Avicel
Multivariate statistical analysis of X-ray data The CrI of cellulose samples was also calculated by quanti-fying the contribution of amorphous cellulose (PASC) and Avicel to its (normalized) X-ray diffraction spectra [58]:
Ijð2hÞ ¼ fjIpð2hÞ þ ð1 fjÞIcð2hÞ þ e ð3Þ where Ij(2h) is the intensity of the jthsample at diffraction angle 2h, Ip (2h) is the intensity of PASC at diffraction angle 2h, IC(2h) is the intensity of untreated Avicel at dif-fraction angle 2h, fj is the contribution of PASC to the spectrum and e is the random error
^
fj,the least square estimate of fj, was used to estimate the crystallinity by multiplying the contribution of Avicel ð1 ^fjÞ by its crystallinity (calculated by CP ⁄ MAS 13 C-NMR as 60%):
CrIj¼ ð1 fjÞ CrIc ð4Þ where CrIj is the crystallinity (in percentage) of the jth sample of Avicel AND CrIc is the crystallinity of Avicel (calculated by CP⁄ MAS13
C-NMR as 60%)
Cel7A purification Trichoderma reesei QM9414 was grown on potato dextrose agar plate under light illumination Spores were harvested and used to inoculate the liquid medium (minimal medium: (NH4)2SO4 5 gÆL)1, CaCl2 0.6 gÆL)1, MgSO4 0.6 gÆL)1,
KH2PO4 15 gÆL)1, MnSO4.H2O 1.5 mgÆL)1, FeSO4.7H2O
5 mgÆL)1, COCl2 2 mgÆL)1, ZnSO4 1.5 mgÆL)1) supple-mented with glucose (2%) After 3 days at 28C and
150 r.p.m., the fungus was grown on lactose (2%) in
Trang 10mini-mal medium for up to 12 days at 28C and 150 r.p.m.
After filtration over glass-microfiber filter (1.6 lm GF⁄ A;
Whatman, Maidstone, UK), the filtrate was diafiltered by
repeated concentration and dilution with sodium acetate
buffer (50 mm, pH 5.5) using a polyethersulfone membrane
(molecular weight cut-off of 10 kDa) The concentrate was
purified by means of anion-exchange chromatography using
a Q-Sepharose Fast Flow with a 10–500 mm sodium acetate
gradient (pH 5.5) Cel7A was eluted in the last peak, and
purity was confirmed by SDS-PAGE, where only one single
protein band was observable ( 67 kDa) Enzyme
concen-trations were estimated by the Bradford assay, using BSA
as standard
Adsorption study
Cellulose samples (20 mgÆmL)1) in NaOAc buffer (50 mm,
pH 5) were incubated at 50C for 1 h at 900 r.p.m., and
then were cooled down to 4 C Cellulases were added in
various amounts and the mixture was further agitated for
30 min After centrifugation, the supernatant was collected
and protein content analysis was performed using the BCA
protein assay kit (Thermo Fischer Scientific)
Acknowledgements
Chevron Corporation is acknowledged for their
fund-ing Dr J Leisen and Dr J I Hong are thanked for
their technical assistance with the crystallinity
measure-ments
References
1 Himmel ME, Ding SY, Johnson DK, Adney WS,
Nimlos MR, Brady JW & Foust TD (2007) Biomass
recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for
biofuels production Science 315, 804–807
2 Himmel ME, Ruth MF & Wyman CE (1999) Cellulase
for commodity products from cellulosic biomass Curr
Opin Biotechnol 10, 358–364
3 Wyman CE (2007) What is (and is not) vital to
advanc-ing cellulosic ethanol Trends Biotechnol 25, 153–157
4 Lynd LR, Laser MS, Brandsby D, Dale BE, Davison
B, Hamilton R, Himmel M, Keller M, McMillan JD,
Sheehan J et al (2008) How biotech can transform
biofuels Nat Biotechnol 26, 169–172
5 Divne C, Sta˚hlberg J, Reinikainen T, Ruohonen L,
Pettersson G, Knowles JKC, Teeri TT & Jones TA
(1994) The 3-dimensional crystal-structure of the
catalytic core of cellobiohydrolase-i from Trichoderma
reesei Science 265, 524–528
6 Divne C, Sta˚hlberg J, Teeri TT & Jones TA (1998)
High-resolution crystal structures reveal how a cellulose
chain is bound in the 50 angstrom long tunnel of
cello-biohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei J Mol Biol 275, 309–325
7 Teeri TT (1997) Crystalline cellulose degradation: new insight into the function of cellobiohydrolases Trends
in Biotechnology 15, 160–167
8 Kipper K, Va¨ljama¨e P & Johansson G (2005) Processive action of cellobiohydrolase Cel7A from Trichoderma reeseiis revealed as ‘burst’ kinetics on fluorescent poly-meric model substrates Biochem J 385, 527–535
9 Li YC, Irwin DC & Wilson DB (2007) Processivity, substrate binding, and mechanism of cellulose hydroly-sis by Thermobifida fusca Ce19A Appl Environ Microbiol 73, 3165–3172
10 Davies G & Henrissat B (1995) Structures and mecha-nisms of glycosyl hydrolases Structure 3, 853–859
11 Henrissat B (1994) Cellulases and their interaction with cellulose Cellulose 1, 169–196
12 Knowles J, Lehtovaara P & Teeri T (1987) Cellulase families and their genes Trends in Biotechnology 5, 255–261
13 Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH & Pretorius IS (2002) Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66, 506–577
14 Zhang YHP & Lynd LR (2004) Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: noncomplexed cellulase systems Biotechnol Bioeng 88, 797–824
15 Va¨ljama¨e P, Sild V, Nutt A, Pettersson G & Johansson
G (1999) Acid hydrolosis of bacterial cellulose reveals different modes of synergistic action between cellobio-hydrolase I and endoglucanase I Eur J Biochem 266, 327–334
16 Medve J, Karlsson J, Lee D & Tjerneld F (1998) Hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose by cellobiohy-drolase I and endoglucanase II from Trichoderma reesei: adsorption, sugar production pattern, and synergism of the enzymes Biotechnol Bioeng 59, 621–634
17 Hoshino E, Shiroishi M, Amano Y, Nomura M & Kanda T (1997) Synergistic actions of exo-type
cellulas-es in the hydrolysis of cellulose with different crystallini-ties J Ferment Bioeng 84, 300–306
18 Nidetzky B, Hayn M, Macarron R & Steiner W (1993) Synergism of Trichoderma reesei cellulases while degrad-ing different celluloses Biotechnol Lett 15, 71–76
19 Henrissat B, Driguez H, Viet C & Schulein M (1985) Synergism of cellulases from Trichoderma reesei in the degradation of cellulose Biotechnology 3, 722–726
20 Bansal P, Hall M, Realff MJ, Lee JH & Bommarius AS (2009) Modeling cellulase kinetics on lignocellulosic substrates Biotechnol Adv 27, 833–848
21 Sta˚hlberg J, Johansson G & Pettersson G (1991) A new model for enzymatic-hydrolysis of cellulose based on the 2-domain structure of cellobiohydrolase-I Biotech-nology 9, 286–290