1. Trang chủ
  2. » Ngoại Ngữ

EF 4th Biennial Epilepsy Pipeline Update Conference

17 6 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 17
Dung lượng 604,33 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Schachterb,c,d,⁎ , Joseph Sirvene, Roger Porterf,g a Department of Neurology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA b Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deacone

Trang 1

Conference Proceedings

The Epilepsy Foundation's 4th Biennial Epilepsy Pipeline

Update Conference

Jacqueline A Frencha, Steven C Schachterb,c,d,⁎ , Joseph Sirvene, Roger Porterf,g

a

Department of Neurology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

b Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA

c

Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

d

Consortia for Improving Medicine Through Innovation and Technology, Boston, MA, USA

e

Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ, USA

f

Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

g

Department of Pharmacology, USUHS, Bethesda, MD, USA

a b s t r a c t

a r t i c l e i n f o

Article history:

Received 2 February 2015

Accepted 9 February 2015

Available online xxxx

Keywords:

Epilepsy

Seizure

Therapies

Devices

Diagnostics

Innovation

Food and Drug Administration

Pipeline

On June 5 and 6, 2014, the Epilepsy Foundation held its 4th Biennial Epilepsy Pipeline Update Conference, an ini-tiative of the Epilepsy Therapy Project, which showcased the most promising epilepsy innovations from health-care companies and academic laboratories dedicated to pioneering and advancing drugs, biologics, technologies, devices, and diagnostics for epilepsy Speakers and attendees included emerging biotech and medical technology companies, major pharmaceutical and device companies, as well as investigators and innovators at the cutting-edge of epilepsy The program included panel discussions on collaboration between small and large companies, how to get products in need of funding to the marketplace, who is currently funding epilepsy and CNS innovation, and how the NIH facilitates early-stage drug development Finally, the conference featured the third annual

“Shark Tank” competition The presentations are summarized in this paper, which is followed by a compilation

of the meeting poster abstracts

© 2015 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved

1 Introduction

On June 5 and 6, 2014, the Epilepsy Foundation (EF), based in

Landover, Maryland, USA, held its 4th Biennial Epilepsy Pipeline Update

Conference, an initiative of the Epilepsy Therapy Project, at the Hyatt

Regency in San Francisco, California Showcasing the most promising

epilepsy therapies from health-care companies and academic

laborato-ries dedicated to pioneering and advancing drugs, biologics,

technolo-gies, and devices for epilepsy, this conference also featured the third

annual“Shark Tank” competition On the day following the Pipeline

conference, a day-long program was held for people with epilepsy,

fam-ilies, and advocates

The Epilepsy Pipeline Update Conference brought together

decision-makers with shared interests in epilepsy treatment and diagnosis and

product development Speakers and attendees included emerging

bio-tech and medical bio-technology companies, major pharmaceutical and

de-vice companies, as well as investigators and innovators at the

cutting-edge of epilepsy and advances in treatment of central nervous system

(CNS) diseases

The program also included panel discussions on topics such as the role

of collaboration between small and large companies, how to get products

in need of funding to the marketplace, who is funding epilepsy and CNS in-novation today, and how the NIH facilitates early-stage drug development

“The Epilepsy Foundation's Pipeline Conference is recognized as the premier business and scientific forum for driving innovation in the field

of epilepsy and neurology,” said Philip M Gattone, President and CEO of the Epilepsy Foundation.“Each year, this conference brings together great minds in R&D, clinical thought leaders, investors, and industry leaders who are focused on accelerating epilepsy drug and device development.”

“This conference has grown to attract an impressive audience Com-panies are recognizing the need for and promise in developing potential new therapeutics for epilepsy,” said Jacqueline French, MD, Professor of Neurology, New York University

The“Shark Tank” competition, held on the second day of the confer-ence, is designed to spur breakthroughs that will change the lives of people living with epilepsy Over the past two years, entrepreneurs, scientists, clinicians, industrial design engineers, and members of the epilepsy community have been recognized for their truly inventive product concepts, which have ranged from promising new therapeutics

or technologies to new products that improve the quality of life for peo-ple living with epilepsy At the 2014 Epilepsy Pipeline Conference, the

Epilepsy & Behavior xxx (2015) xxx–xxx

⁎ Corresponding author at: 165 Cambridge St, Suite 702, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

Tel.: +1 617 643 3835.

E-mail address: sschacht@bidmc.harvard.edu (S.C Schachter).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.02.033

1525-5050/© 2015 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.

Contents lists available atScienceDirect

Epilepsy & Behavior

j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e :w w w e l s e v i e r c o m / l o c a t e / y e b e h

Trang 2

winner was selected by live audience vote from the epilepsy community

and a panel of distinguished reviewers The Shark Tank award recipients

received international recognition and cash prizes totaling $200,000 to

fund the development of novel ideas

The authors of this report attended the conference and wrote

the text based on hearing the presentations at the conference as

well as reviewing the meeting recordings (http://www.epilepsy.com/

which are recommended to readers interested in more details as well as

the question-and-answer sessions Most but not all of the presentation

summaries were reviewed for accuracy by speakers The affiliations

and titles of authors are accurate as of the date of their presentation,

but may have since changed

2 Session 1: introduction and keynote address

2.1 Introduction Philip Gattone, President and Chief Executive Officer,

Epilepsy Foundation; Warren Lammert, Chairman, Board of Directors,

Epilepsy Foundation

Mr Phillip Gattone, CEO and President of EF, opened the conference

Mr Gattone remarked that this Pipeline Conference is thefirst to be

webcast (

http://www.epilepsy.com/information/professionals/epilepsy-foundation-events-webcasts) and streamed live overEpilepsy.com He

welcomed all participants and stressed the importance of this conference,

which helps to uniquely unify the epilepsy community with active

participation from patient advocates, venture capitalists, basic scientists,

pharmaceutical and device industry companies, and clinicians Mr

Gattone then introduced Mr Warren Lammert, Chairman of the Epilepsy

Foundation Board of Directors Mr Lammert also welcomed all

partici-pants to this unique conference and highlighted how this conference

fur-thers the vision of the Epilepsy Foundation research mission in order to

help bolster the translation of novel ideas into new treatments for

pa-tients with epilepsy in an expedited manner

2.2 The annual state of the drug pipeline— keynote Jacqueline French,

MD, Professor of Neurology, New York University; Co-director, Epilepsy

Research and Epilepsy Clinical Trials, NYU Comprehensive Epilepsy

Center; President, Epilepsy Study Consortium

Dr French highlighted the fact that although there are many

treat-ments that have become available for epilepsy, there is still a paucity

of treatment for those who have drug-resistant epilepsy and for

numer-ous epilepsy syndromes In particular, she pointed out that a better way

to predict the effectiveness of various drugs is needed There are still too

few options for newly diagnosed patients as many of the advances in

epilepsy management are directed to those with drug-resistant

epilep-sy In addition, there is a paucity of treatments for the comorbidities of

epilepsy Even more importantly, there are no therapies that truly

pre-vent the disease Most treatments are geared towards the concept of

preventing further seizures but we do not have any antiepileptogenic

or disease-modifying therapies Even when a drug is approved, neither

animal models nor clinical trials predict if a drug will be successful in

day-to-day clinical practice Despite many new approved antiepileptic

drugs (AEDs), there are few in phase II trials[1] Dr French summarized

her presentation by reminding the audience that so much more work is

needed to discover new AEDs with the ability to truly help patients

2.3 Annual state of the device pipeline— keynote Robert Fisher, MD, PhD,

Maslah Saul Professor of Neurology, Director, Stanford Comprehensive

Epilepsy Program

Dr Fisher divided his comments into different categories of devices

Specifically, he discussed seizure alerts or predictors; adherence

moni-tors; clinical information systems; optical control or optogenetics;

new ways of drug delivery; focal energy such as radiosurgery, laser, and ultrasound; and neurostimulation

Regarding seizure alerts, SmartWatch and EpiAlert are currently available These devices alert caregivers of seizures via wireless mobile phones or PDAs Novel systems that alert patients and caregivers to their seizures are being devised These systems operate on seizure detection by electrodermal responses, muscle activity by electromyog-raphy, or electroencephalography (EEG) patches[2–4] For seizure pre-diction, a device is in trials in which implantable EEG leads are placed in the area of a seizure focus which attach to a personal advisory device that alerts patients when a seizure is likely to occur[5]

Adherence monitors are compliance-alerting devices with the ability

to instantly provide information about pill-taking, blood test readouts of AED levels, or even when a pill reaches the stomach Related to compli-ance devices are seizure diaries with three currently available online ep-ilepsy diaries: My Epep-ilepsy Diary,Seizuretracker.com, and Patients Like Me

These diary applications help to better provide information to health-care practitioners and to the patients themselves as self-management tools

Optogenetics is a promising technique where light-induced signals can either excite or inhibit neuronal activity, carrying with it the prom-ise of enhancing epilepsy management One of the provided examples was the idea of using a yellow light that activates a rhodopsin gene, which in turn opens a chloride channel, hyperpolarizing a transfected neuron and rapidly stopping the neuron fromfiring[6]

There are a number of therapeutic devices with the ability to deliver treatment by novel approaches including inhalation, buccal absorption, and infusion pumps Focal energy can also be delivered to ablate epi-leptic tissue, such as with stereotactic radiosurgery or thermal ablation [7] Focused ultrasound is a very new potential treatment with some promise Lastly, various neuromodulatory techniques, including vagus nerve stimulation, transcranial magnetic brain stimulation, trigeminal nerve stimulation, thalamic deep brain stimulation, and responsive neurostimulation, are either currently available or being trialed[8,9]

3 Session 2: what was better in 2013 than 2012— progress in epilepsy therapy

3.1 FDA and epilepsy trials: past, present, and future Russell Katz, MD, Consultant, Epilepsy Study Consortium

Dr Russell Katz, consultant to the Epilepsy Study Consortium and former Food and Drug Administration (FDA) official, discussed the FDA and epilepsy trials: past, present, and future He noted that in par-ticular, there are four areas in which the FDA is considering new forms

of acceptable data: monotherapy indication, pediatric indication, design

of add-on trials, and controlled released products

Monotherapy claims are difficult to attain because of the ethical concerns about performing trials where standard of care is withdrawn for the drug being studied, and further, it has been difficult to extrapo-late information from add-on trials He pointed out problems with not accepting equivalence trials, yet companies want to have a

monothera-py claim A white paper has been drafted, and the FDA is reviewing it in order to address these issues and look for novel ways to approve a monotherapy indication, including possibly extrapolating from add-on studies, if proper dosing information is available

Pediatric claims have always required that a clinical trial be per-formed in pediatric patients However, pediatric claims based on adult clinical trials can be made, assuming the disease is similar in both the adults and children in a sufficient manner that one could make that claim in a reliable and safe manner, and that pediatric dosing could be provided However, to date, these criteria have not been considered to have been met Therefore, the FDA is working onfinding novel ways

to establish those claims, including the possibility that extrapolation from adult data might be acceptable

Trang 3

Add-on trials themselves are now being rethought as a result of a

re-cent meta-analysis by Ryvlin[9.5]in which SUDEP risk was shown to be

lower in clinical trials for those who were randomized to effective drugs

compared to those randomized to placebo This led to the concern that

the current add-on trial design is not ethically viable Therefore, the FDA

is working on new ways to assess novel endpoints, such as time to the

nth seizure as opposed to the current manner in which the studies are

assessed

Dr Katz also addressed approval of controlled release products,

spe-cifically the requirement that controlled trials need to be done in order

to show that a controlled release product is effective Recently, a study

of an extended release topiramate was able to show that at all points

during the day (not just at Cmaxand total AUC), the plasma levels and

partial AUCs met bioequivalence criteria compared to the levels of

im-mediate release Topamax (topiramate) This led to the approval of the

controlled released product Dr Katz summarized by saying that the

FDA continues to work tofind better ways to assess drug trials and

im-prove the approval process for AEDs

3.2 Why industry should keep investing in epilepsy Christopher Gallen,

MD, PhD, President and Chief Executive Officer, SK Biopharmaceuticals, SK

Life Sciences

Dr Christopher Gallen, President and Chief Executive Officer, SK

Biopharmaceuticals, SK Life Sciences, stated the case for why industry

should keep investing in epilepsy, noting that the short answer to the

question is that“we can succeed” He said that the success rates of

CNS therapeutics are relatively low when compared to other disease

states like infectious diseases because those areas are comparatively

simple with core pathology largely internal to a single cell Nervous

sys-tem disorders involve far more complex syssys-tems, composed of many

cells, transmitters, and regulatory systems and a core pathology

involv-ing systems of cells— consequently, these disorders are not as amenable

to simple target-oriented in vitro or cellular screening models, and they

are better addressed by targeting modulation of pathophysiological

pro-cesses rather than point targets

Epilepsy, he pointed out, is not simple Existing animal predictive

models have limitations in that they test specific pathophysiological

mechanisms in a complex system but do not mimic the entirety of any

human pathology But the animal and human screening models have

significant predictive utility even with their limitations, more so than

al-most any other CNS area Of critical importance, in epilepsy, when the

drug works, high quality clinical trials typically work Trial success is

much more problematic in many CNS areas such as depression where

even known effective drugs often fail in large clinical trials This makes

epilepsy a greatfirst indication to assess the effectiveness of certain

novel medication mechanisms

He also noted that while existing AEDs are useful, epilepsy remains a

great market with a major unmet medical need— particularly to move

from reduction of numbers of seizures to the goal of complete seizure

cessation He pointed out that economic growth in Asia and elsewhere

from the changing demographics together with the spread of capitalism

is driving the availability of modern medicine to billions of people in

new corners of the world, opening the opportunity to serve a huge

new market that will ultimately exceed all existing markets combined

In terms of prescription number, nervous system disorders are the

larg-est therapeutic area The emergence of genuinely superior next

genera-tion proprietary therapies will overcome crowded markets, pricing

pressure, and generic erosion, and their commercial success will fund

the development of future generations of ever-improving therapeutics

until the scourge of epilepsy is contained Epilepsy is a large initial

mar-ket, and the fact that drugs proven useful in epilepsy often prove to be

useful in other nervous system disorders opens even larger markets

As hefinished his presentation, he noted that “The logic of winning

is attacking where competitors are absent Many large pharma

compa-nies have abandoned nervous system development because it was too

hard This opens the opportunity for smaller competitors with novel ap-proaches to drug invention to pick an initial serious indication like epi-lepsy where animal models, human models, and clinical trials in concert work tofind effective therapeutics, displace older less effective thera-peutics, then expand to additional indications Epilepsy is a place where you can win”

3.3 The NINDS ASP: yesterday, today, and tomorrow John Kehne, PhD, Program Director, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; H Steve White, PhD, Professor and Director, Anticonvulsant Drug Development Program, University of Utah

Dr John Kehne and Dr H Steve White discussed the National Insti-tute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Anticonvulsant Screening Program (ASP) Dr Kehne is a Program Director at NINDS and Head of the ASP, and Dr White is Professor and Director of the Anticonvulsant Drug Development (ADD) Program at the University of Utah Dr Kehne started the presentation by pointing out that the ASP provides free compound testing to academia and industry through

a contract between NINDS and the University of Utah Since it was established in 1975, the ASP has contributed to nine“third generation” marketed AEDs

He then provided an overview of the ASP testing workflow In the initial identification phase, compounds are tested against maximal elec-troshock seizures, the 32-mA 6-Hz test, the corneal-kindled mouse, and

on a behavioral toxicity test Active compounds are further tested for initial differentiation using pharmacoresistance models, e.g., the

44-mA 6-Hz test, the bursting hippocampal slice, and the lamotrigine-resistant kindled rat, and for effects on seizure threshold using the IV pentylenetetrazole test Active compounds advance to full differentia-tion, which currently includes efficacy in a post-status epilepticus (SE) epileptic rodent model and evaluation for effects on cognition in a long-term potentiation test and in the Morris water maze assay In addi-tion to this“standard track” serial screening protocol, a new “special projects” track allows flexibility for assessing novel therapeutic mecha-nisms Lastly, Dr Kehne highlighted the PANAChE (Public Access to Neuroactive and Anticonvulsant Chemical Evaluations) Data Sharing Initiative; a publicly accessible database for nonconfidential data and in-formation from the ASP developed as a tool to further stimulate epilepsy drug discovery The database was released at the December 2013

annu-al meeting of the American Epilepsy Society and currently contains 150 literature reference compounds[10]

Dr H Steve White's lecture provided a snapshot of models under evaluation by the ASP Specifically, he highlighted the intrahippocampal kainite mouse model for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, as well as a battery of tests to evaluate cognitive liability He focused on Theiler's virus mouse model of encephalitis-induced epilepsy and then the novel stress-free approach to the chronic delivery of AEDs to“newly di-agnosed” epileptic rats using a recently designed automated feeder sys-tem Dr White summarized the presentation by stating that the mesial temporal lobe epilepsy mouse, Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus model, and the battery of cognitive tests, once fully implemented, will aid in the differentiation of promising investigational drugs submitted

to the ASP Moreover, the automated feeder system provides a unique and stress-free mechanism for the chronic delivery of a drug to epileptic rats and provides a novel solution to chronic oral-dosing studies New models and approaches are directly addressing the recommendations

of the 2012 NINDS working group report and expanding the testing ar-mamentarium of the ASP

3.4 Epilepsy therapies: accomplishments and challenges Roger J Porter,

MD, Chief Scientific Officer, Epilepsy Foundation

Dr Roger J Porter, EF CSO, discussed the challenges of trying to guide

a compound to a successfully approved drug that can help patients with epilepsy He started by defining the valley of death This is

Trang 4

basically the time in a compound's development between its screening

for potential use in epilepsy to a clinical trial He highlighted that the

Epilepsy Foundation has helped by funding 60 of 123 potential epilepsy

compounds through its Epilepsy Therapy Pipeline initiative He then

asked the question, are we taking enough risks? He noted that in

com-parison to other conditions, epilepsy has $5.3 million with regard to

annual research compared to $61 million for Parkinson's disease and

$40 million for multiple sclerosis and muscular dystrophy— two other

diseases that affect far fewer patients Clearly, the epilepsy community

needs to drive clinical research Mechanisms exist and we are well

primed to take advantage of this, but we need to invest in platform

part-nerships and even consider crowdfunding Hefinished the talk by

reminding the audience that there is a massive underserved population

of persons with epilepsy that needs our help

4 Session 3: early stage drug pipeline: proof of principle through IND

The conference then moved to discussion of treatments in the early

stage of the pipeline, with 12 presentations by companies with products

that are currently in the stage of development between proof of

princi-ple and clinical trials

4.1 Intellimedix Novel approaches to drug discovery with applications to

epilepsy and mitochondrial disease Jeffrey Skolnick, PhD, Scientific Advisor,

Intellimedix; Director of the Integrated Biosystems Institute at Georgia

Institute of Technology

Jeffrey Skolnick, PhD, who is the Director of the Center for the Study

of Systems Biology at the Georgia Institute of Technology, presented on

behalf of Intellimedix This system is a high throughput screening

ap-proach currently being used for epilepsy with specific emphasis on

Dravet syndrome and mitochondrial disorders He noted the strategy

of using computational analysis as a screening tool and then moving

to zebrafish models and on to small-scale clinical trials He emphasized

the importance of this tool by citing successful examples such as the

screening of progesterone using the zebrafish Dravet model as well as

mifepristone Moreover, the company is utilizing calcium imaging to

classify seizure type and testing to assess antiepileptic mechanism of

action

4.2 Asklepios BioPharmaceutical, Inc Galanin gene delivery for

temporal lobe epilepsy Cynthia Rask, MD, Chief Medical Officer,

Asklepios BioPharmaceutical, Inc

Dr Cynthia Rask of Asklepios BioPharmaceutical discussed

gala-nin gene delivery for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy This company is

developing gene delivery technology based on adeno-associated virus

(AAV) to deliver therapeutic genes Because galanin has been shown

to attenuate seizures and cell death in multiple animal models, they

are working to utilize efficient viral vectors to deliver the galanin gene

to a seizure focus in the temporal lobe Their goal is to achieve optimal

transduction of cells constituting a localized expression of the inhibitory

factor, galanin Delivery of the gene transfer product is achieved by

ste-reotactic injection into a defined seizure focus to attenuate local seizure

activity There are three classes of galanin-signaling receptors, and she

pointed out in the early studies that infusion of galanin into the CNS

sig-nificantly attenuated seizure activity in a number of animal models

[11–13] Proof-of-concept studies are in the public domain, and dose

es-calation studies to determine the upper limit that can be delivered are

completed[14–17] Currently, the company is evaluating a delivery

sys-tem with Medtronic Preliminary nonhuman primate and sheep studies

are completed Definitive dosing studies (in rodents and nonhuman

pri-mates), as well as the toxicology and biodistribution studies that are

re-quired prior to conducting studies in humans, are currently being

planned

4.3 AurimMed Pharma, Inc AMP-X-0079 Amir Pesyan (presented by Roger J Porter, MD in Dr Pesyan's absence), Chairman and Chief Executive

Officer, AurimMed Pharma, Inc

Amir Pesyan, Chairman and CEO of AurimMed Pharma, Inc., discussed the compound AMPX-0079 AMP-X-0079 has been shown

in in vivo studies to be orally and parenterally bioavailable, fast-acting (rapid oral absorption within 15 min), with a reasonably long pharma-cological half-life in animal models, and able to pass through the blood– brain barrier, thereby manifesting its pharmacological effects directly in the CNS This compound has been tested using Cerep® Full-BioPrint It has no significant activity at any Cerep® targets It is a CYP450substrate with no P-glycoprotein inhibition The chemical lacks side effects asso-ciated with any Cerep® targets, suggesting a novel mechanism of action AMP-X-0079 is effective in the only two validated models for partial epilepsy, MES and kindling In addition, AMP-X-0079 is effective in vir-tually all other models of epilepsy, including the lamotrigine-resistant amygdala-kindled rat and, most recently, in the mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) mouse, in which classical AEDs are ineffective, imply-ing substantial broad-spectrum activity

The immediate plans for this product are phenotypic screening and prediction of sedative side effect The company will determine whether AMPX-0079 exhibits a functional similarity to known sedative compounds If yes, at what concentration does it exhibit a functional similarity to known sedative compounds? Their future plans are to cre-ate IND-enabling studies for genetic, general, toxicology, analytical, and safety pharmacology There are development challenges with regard to funding, and the company is looking for help with this

4.4 BioCrea GmbH LT GABAA PAMs for refractory epilepsy Norbert Hoefgen, PhD, Vice President Discovery, BioCrea Germany

Dr Hoefgen presented LT GABAA PAMs for the treatment of

refracto-ry epilepsy GABAA PAM has a novel GABAA beta mechanism of action The long-term effective site of action for GABAA PAM is different than the benzodiazepine receptor site This compound interfaces at the alpha beta 2-receptor site GABAA PAM shows activity at extrasynaptic GABAA receptors, which are resistant to benzodiazepine action Thus, these compounds could be useful for treating refractory epilepsy, refrac-tory status epilepticus, and Rett syndrome Moreover, these drugs are highly differentiated from traditional benzodiazepines and may be syn-ergistic with existing therapeutic compounds Hoefgen stated how these compounds appear to have a broad-spectrum anticonvulsant ef fi-cacy in animal models, superiority in models of refractory epilepsy, and relative freedom from the development of tolerance with twice-daily dosing[18–20] The data support a therapeutic value of long-term GABAA PAMs for the long-term treatment of epilepsy with excellent ef-ficacy, lack of tolerance, good therapeutic index, good oral availability, and low risk of drug interaction He further stated that the lack of devel-opment of tolerance together with activity at the extrasynaptic GABAA receptors suggests potential as a prime treatment for status epilepticus, and the company is looking for partners to help bring this compound to market

4.5 Epalex Inhaled treatment for refractory epilepsy Michael Rogawski,

MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis

Dr Michael Rogawski provided information on an inhaled treatment

to stop seizures once they start in the brain but before they spread to be-come more severe, which is being developed in collaboration with Epalex Corp Propofol hemisuccinate (PHS), a proprietary propofol prodrug, has been formulated for pulmonary delivery by nebulization The concept is that PHS would be self-administered during a seizure aura to prevent the localized seizure discharge from progressing to a full-blown seizure or by a caregiver to terminate seizure clusters or

Trang 5

status epilepticus Animal studies have shown that intrapulmonary

PHS has potent, broad-spectrum antiseizure activity[21] Inhalation

toxicology studies in rats demonstrated that intratracheal PHS does

not cause histopathological changes in the lung In collaboration with

NINDS and NIH's National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

(NCATS), clinical-grade PHS has been manufactured, and a proprietary

clinical formulation has been developed Nonclinical studies are being

completed that will enable PHS to enter clinical trials This work is partly

supported through the NCATS BrIDGs (Bridging Interventional

Develop-ment Gaps) program

4.6 Fluorinov Pharma Inc FV-082: a safer orally active broad-spectrum

antiepileptic drug candidate Malik Slassi, PhD, President and Chief

Scientific Officer, Fluorinov Pharma Inc

Dr Malik Slassi, President and CSO of Fluorinov Pharma, discussed

the progress of one of their three lead AED candidates, FV-082, an orally

active broad-spectrum AED He emphasized that FV-082 was a unique

chemotype with a novel mechanism of action This chemical displays a

broad spectrum of efficacy profile and is very well tolerated in multiple

epilepsy animal models Dr Slassi noted that FV-082 exhibits a superior

preclinical safety profile when compared with leading AEDs[18,22,23]

It also demonstrated robust activity in amygdala-kindled rats,

suggest-ing potential clinical efficacy for the treatment of complex partial

seizures

FV-082 selectively modulates the Nav1.8 channel, androgen

recep-tor (AR), and MAOB region with no activity in over 100 related targets

Further studies are ongoing Preliminary safety data on this compound

show lack of typical deep sedation, and it is well tolerated in different

species up to 1000 mg/kg with only very mild clinical signs reported

There were no abnormalities in terms of liver function enzyme

eleva-tions and no weight gain, and other neurological signs were similar to

vehicle controls Besides its broad spectrum AED potential, the

com-pound has robust efficacy in models of inflammatory and neuropathic

pain

Dr Slassi summarized by saying that this compound is a new AED

chemically unrelated to current AEDs with an excellent safety profile

in the mouse, rat, and dog The drug inhibits the voltage-gated sodium

channel Nav1.8 and interacts with AR and MAOB It has an excellent

PK profile in rats and dogs In animal seizure models, it possesses a

broad-spectrum profile, and it demonstrated efficacy in models of

neu-ropathic and inflammatory pain The plans for testing this compound in

human clinical trials are underway

4.7 NeuroGate Therapeutics, Inc Extended neuroamides Harold Kohn,

PhD, Kenan Distinguished Professor, Division of Chemical Biology and

Medicinal Chemistry, University of North Carolina; Eshelman School

of Pharmacy and Department of Chemistry, University of North

Carolina–Chapel Hill; Founder, NeuroGate Therapeutics, Inc

Harold Kohn, PhD, Kenan Distinguished Professor, the Division

of Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry at the UNC Eshelman

School of Pharmacy and Department of Chemistry, provided

infor-mation about extended neuroamides (ENAs) Extended

neuro-amides are novel drug candidates for epilepsy and pain that control

neuronal hyperexcitability[22,24] He noted that ENAs strategically

combine pharmacophores found in functionalized amino acids (FAAs),

such as lacosamide (Vimpat®), withα-aminoamides (AAAs), such

as safinamide and ralfinamide Both FAAs and AAAs are potent

anticon-vulsants It is believed that the targets for ENAs are sodium channels

with potential benefit for pathological states such as seizures, pain,

and other neurological conditions The ENAs exhibit excellent activities

in multiple, validated animal seizure models and displayed minimal

neurotoxicity at high doses They also displayed good drug properties

with high bioavailability, low clearance rates, and high

brain-to-plasma ratios He emphasized the lower development risk for these

drugs as they were designed using validated pharmacophores and that these molecules served as functional inhibitors of sodium channels that potently transition sodium channels to the slow inactivated state and show frequency use-dependent inhibition at therapeutically acces-sible concentrations, thus providing greater control of neuronal hyperexcitability

4.8 NeuroGenomeX, Inc 2DG Thomas P Sutula, MD, PhD, Founder, Chief Technical Officer and Director, NeuroGenomeX, Inc

Dr Sutula, Professor and Chair of the Department of Neurology at the University of Wisconsin and the Founder and CTO of NeuroGenomeX, Inc., discussed the novel anticonvulsant disease-modifying antiepileptic and neuroprotective effects of 2-deoxyglucose (2DG) with therapeutic opportunities for epilepsy and traumatic brain injury The 2DG is a glu-cose analog with novel neuroprotective and anticonvulsant disease modifying effects on plasticity[25] Preclinical efficacy studies in

epilep-sy are completed Delivery of 2DG to neurons and circuits is activity de-pendent, which is a novel advantageous property for an anticonvulsant Currently, the company has two US patents issued for epilepsy and a US patent for traumatic brain injury The drug has favorable animal toxicity and human toxicology Potential clinical uses include intractable

epilep-sy, seizure clusters, status epilepticus, and traumatic brain injury The company is funded by the Epilepsy Therapy Project–Epilepsy Research Foundation for an initial clinical trial to assess tolerability and efficacy

of 2DG in intractable epilepsy

4.9 INSYS Therapeutics, Inc Synthetic CBD Mark W Davis, Senior Director, Clinical, INSYS Therapeutics, Inc

Mr Davis, Senior Director, Clinical, INSYS Therapeutics, Inc., ex-plained the use of pharmaceutical cannabidiol (CBD) for epilepsy He introduced INSYS Therapeutics and noted recent successful anecdotal cases of marijuana usage with a high ratio of CBD for multiple indi-cations in epilepsy They havefiled (and since received) orphan drug designations in two indications — Lennox–Gastaut syndrome and Dravet syndrome The company will be conducting clinical studies in epilepsy and is currently working with leading universities and re-searchers on pilot studies to investigate cannabidiol usage across a vari-ety of indications INSYS' cannabidiol is produced via synthetic reaction and HPLC purification for a product that is ≥99.5% cannabidiol There is

no use of plant-based materials It is consistently reproducible and manufactured in the United States Other INSYS products currently available include generic dronabinol and Subsys® (fentanyl sublingual spray)

4.10 NeuroAdjuvants, Inc Galanin receptor 2-based therapy H Steve White, PhD, Professor and Director, Anticonvulsant Drug Development Program, University of Utah

Dr H Steve White provided a synopsis of galanin receptor 2-based therapy The specific highlighted compound was NAX 810-2, a novel galanin receptor 2 preferring neuropeptide analog for the treatment of epilepsy and pain This modified neuropeptide is metabolically stable and blood–brain barrier permeable Unlike galanin receptor 1-prefer-ring compounds, the preclinical profile of NAX 810-2 shows no effect

on plasma glucose levels at therapeutic doses Moreover, NAX 810-2 possesses a favorable CYP induction and inhibition profile with potent analgesic activity in several animal models Several preclinical develop-ment activities are planned including broad receptor screening and dose-ranging toxicology and pharmacokinetic studies in rats A pre-IND meeting with the FDA is also planned The goal for this drug is to

be parenterally available

Trang 6

4.11 University of South Florida Ketogenic compounds for the treatment

of epilepsy Dominic D'Agostino, PhD, Assistant Professor, Hyperbaric

Biomedical Research Laboratory

Dr D'Agostino reviewed the use of the high

fat/carbohydrate-restricted ketogenic diet (KD) and its importance for the metabolic

management of seizures through the elevation of specific ketone bodies

Ketone supplementation represents a strategy to circumvent the dietary

restriction associated with the KD and produces a therapeutic ketosis

independent of carbohydrate restriction[26] Ketone supplements

have been created that can produce rapid (15 min) and sustained

(N8 h) nutritional ketosis[27] Ketone esters and ketone mineral salts

are pending FDA Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) approval and

there is a phase I pilot study planned within one year

4.12 SciFluor Life Sciences LLC SF0034: a potent and selective KCNQ2/3

activator as a potential antiepileptic drug Scott Edwards, PhD, Vice

President and General Manager, SciFluor Life Sciences LLC

Dr Edwards, Vice President and General Manager of SciFluor Life

Sciences, introduced SF0034, a potent and selective KCNQ2/3 activator

This potential AED was created by strategic incorporation offluorine to

modulate binding properties Specific fluorine substituents result in a

compound with significantly increased potency and selectivity for

KCNQ2/3, potentially eliminating the urinary retention and cardiac

safe-ty issues of ezogabine and which is much less susceptible to blue

discol-oration than ezogabine This proprietary new chemical entity has an

extensive preclinical dataset, including assessment by the NINDS ASP,

and a 12-month path to the IND The key development challenge is to

show that this new chemical entity has mitigated the skin and eye

tox-icity that resulted in recent label restrictions for ezogabine The

compa-ny has established several academic collaborations to further assess

SF0034 and is looking for development and partnering opportunities

to bring the compound to market for epilepsy

4.13 Sage Therapeutics SAGE 547 for status epilepticus Jeffrey M Jonas,

MD, Chief Executive Officer, Sage Therapeutics

Dr Jonas, CEO of Sage Therapeutics, introduced SAGE-547

injec-tion (allopregnanolone), a novel compound for the management of

super-refractory status epilepticus SAGE-547 has displayed activity in

benzodiazepine-resistant seizure models targeting the alpha-4 subunit

of the GABAAreceptor A phase I/II study in refractory status epilepticus

is currently underway with 20 participating clinical sites Preliminary

data from thefirst four patients with severe status epilepticus, arising

from varying conditions, revealed promising clinical activity

5 Session 4: early-stage diagnostic devices and product pipeline:

new concepts and initialfindings

This session consisted of six presentations by representatives of

companies with devices under development or that are available

com-mercially for the detection of seizures The presentations were followed

by a panel session on user perspectives of seizure detection and alerting

devices

5.1 Cyberonics ProGuardian REST™: an innovative, in-home device system

designed to monitor, detect, and log night-time seizure activity Laurie

Groven, Global Medical Device/Diagnostic Marketing and Sales Executive,

Cyberonics

Laurie Groven, Global Medical Device/Diagnostic Marketing and

Sales Executive and Program Head of ProGuardian at Cyberonics,

pre-sented ProGuardian REST™, a device currently under investigation

The ProGuardian system is based on similar cardiac-based seizure

de-tection technology that is found in the company's AspireSR™ generator

for VNS therapy, which received CE Mark approval in February 2014 The technology has been further modified to provide caregivers, such

as parents of children with epilepsy, an in-home nocturnal seizure detection system Based on Cyberonics' data showing a correlation between generalized seizures and ictal tachycardia, ProGuardian was designed to monitor changes in heart rate It also monitors motion Al-gorithms have been designed to determine whether a particular pattern

of heart rate changes and movement could represent a seizure and if so, audible and visual notifications are generated for the caregiver Sensitiv-ity settings for both heart rate and movement detection can be adjusted

by the end user Operationally, before the patient goes to sleep, a sensor will be attached to aflexible, single-use patch that is applied to the chest, after which the sensor automatically begins to monitor heart rate and establish a communication link with a hub to which seizure

no-tifications are sent upon algorithmic confirmation for the caregiver The hub needs to be within 30 ft of the patient— if the caregiver is further away, an optional Android smartphone app will be able to send noti fica-tions throughout a wi-fi-enabled home Confirmed seizures are elec-tronically logged within the hub, which can generate a report for later review Daytime seizures can be manually added to make the reports more comprehensive

5.2 Brain Sentinel™ EMG-based convulsive seizure detection and warning system José E Cavazos, MD, PhD, Vice President, Medical Affairs, Brain Sentinel, LGCH, Inc

Dr Cavazos, VP, Medical Affairs, and Co-Founder, LGCH, Inc dba Brain Sentinel™, discussed the Brain Sentinel™ seizure detection, anal-ysis, and warning system, which is intended for use in the home, seizure monitoring units, and long-term care facilities such as nursing homes It aims to detect seizures based on using surface electromyogram (EMG) recording of the biceps muscle to detect patterns consistent with mus-cular contractions during seizures such as generalized tonic–clonic sei-zures It is currently undergoing evaluation in a multicenter, phase III, pivotal clinical trial of its sensitivity and false detection rate compared

to multiple reviews of the same subjects' video-EEG recordings The de-vice consists of an EMG sensor that communicates via wi-fi with a base station, which in turn alerts caregivers nearby when a seizure is

detect-ed basdetect-ed on algorithmic analysis of the surface EMG The system in-cludes a microphone to record sounds occurring during seizures Alerts can also be sent via phone, text, or email to caregivers or to sum-mon emergency services All EMG recordings, including marked periods

of ictal EMG, will be saved and stored in near real-time in the cloud, which could assist the patient's clinician in the determination of seizure semiology (e.g., tonic, clonic, or tonic–clonic) and hence potentially in the selection of therapy

5.3 Epitel, Inc Wireless EEG patch Mark Lehmkuhle, PhD, Chief Executive

Officer, Chief Technology Officer, Epitel, Inc., Research Assistant Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah

Dr Lehmkuhle, CEO, CTO, Epitel, Inc., Research Assistant Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, described a wireless EEG patch under development by Epitel, Inc The goal of the EEG patch

is to augment patient self-report of seizure occurrence in diaries with

a quantitative, electrographic report of when seizures occurred and how long they lasted The current prototype is based onflexible circuit boards, has two gold electrodes that are attached on the scalp (at loca-tions guided by an individual patient's prior EEG studies), is covered

byflexible urethane, and logs and transmits EEG data for over three days The prototype is currently being evaluated in the neurocritical care unit at the University of Utah, and recordings have demonstrated clean and artifact-free EEG Once applied to the scalp, it begins to log and transmit EEG data immediately Multiple devices could be placed

on the scalp if needed Efforts are now underway to make a disposable EEG patch that is 1″ by 1″ by 0.25″ with the two electrodes separated

Trang 7

by 24 mm, extend recording time to seven days, and make it waterproof

with polyamide encapsulation The technical challenge of making the

electrode–scalp interface watertight over the duration of the recording

and at the same time ensuring that the electrode gel does not dry out

can be addressed by adding a nonstandard adhesive for the part of the

patch not occupied by the electrodes Candidate adhesives have been

identified which can be removed with acetone at the conclusion of the

recording The company plans to test this new design in patients in

the home setting

5.4 Empatica Embrace: autonomic and seizure events— personalized

monitoring and alerts Rosalind W Picard, ScD, Co-founder, Chief Scientist,

Empatica, Inc., Founder and Director of the Affective Computing Research

Group, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Media Lab; Matteo

Lai, Co-founder, Chief Executive Officer, Empatica, Inc

Dr Picard, Chief Scientist, Empatica, and Mr Lai, CEO, Empatica,

discussed two sensor products worn on the wrist The“E3” is a device

available today for researchers, and the“Embrace” is a

consumer-facing device under development Both sensors measure motion,

tem-perature, and autonomic activity Autonomic activity captures both

branches of the autonomic nervous system: the sympathetic branch

through measurement of electrodermal activity (EDA) and the

para-sympathetic branch through measurement of blood volume pulse,

from which heart rate and heart-rate variability are computed Dr

Picard cited data from a 90-patient study at Boston Children's Hospital

showing that EDA was elevated more than 2 standard deviations

above preictal levels in 100% of generalized tonic–clonic seizures and

in 86% of complex partial seizures[28] She presented otherfindings

showing that combining EDA data with motion sensing increased

accuracy in detecting generalized tonic–clonic seizures compared with

motion sensing alone[29] In a study of 73 children with active epilepsy

recorded for a total of 3525 h, using a nonpersonalized detection

algo-rithm, 77% of the children had zero false detections, while 23% had

from 1 to 16 false detections, with an overall mean ofb0.74/day

Fur-ther, she presented data showing that the magnitude of the ictal EDA

change correlates significantly and positively with the duration of

postictal generalized EEG suppression, an EEG biomarker associated

with SUDEP in a published series of monitored SUDEP cases[30]

Mr Lai said that the current E3, which can stream data for up to 16 h,

connects wirelessly to a smartphone app, and securely sends data to

the cloud He also presented“Embrace”, a new consumer-facing device

being developed based on the E3, which will additionally provide

per-sonalized real-time alerts and insights for both patients and clinicians

to better understand and treat ictal events The Embrace will be the

first comfortably wearable seizure-alerting device to collect clinical

quality autonomic data in patients with epilepsy while providing an

im-portant biomarker correlated to postictal EEG suppression

5.5 Smart Monitor Automated seizure tracking and recording Anoo

Nathan, Chief Executive Officer, Smart Monitor

Ms Nathan, CEO, Smart Monitor, provided an update of

SmartWatch, a device that detects and alerts upon the repetitive

shak-ing motions caused by generalized tonic–clonic seizures (GTCSs) The

SmartWatch is available with a monthly subscription-based pricing

model Sixty percent of current users are under the age of 21 years In

addition to functioning as a wristwatch by telling time and the date,

SmartWatch utilizes algorithms to continuously monitor and analyze

motion and to determine if a pattern of repetitive shaking movements

may be representative of a GTCS Upon detecting patterns of abnormal

movement that may be representative of seizures, and in conjunction

with a companion smartphone, an alert is issued as a text message

and/or phone call that are automatically sent to caregivers or other

des-ignated alert recipients, providing the location of the patient based on

GPS These alerts go out within seconds after the onset of repetitive

shaking motion A panic button on the watch can be pressed by the pa-tient in case of an emergency or if they feel that they are about to have a seizure The SmartWatch supports additional functionality such as giv-ing the patient medication reminders, analyzgiv-ing sleep duration and quality, recording audio during seizure episodes, and providing analyt-ics and reporting/seizure tracking for physicians after data transmission

to back-end cloud-based servers Seizure-related data provided to phy-sicians include duration of the episode, severity (amplitude and fre-quency of the shaking movements), frefre-quency, time of occurrence, and associated audio Detailed tracking and counting of episodes and in-formative user dashboards provide a quick longitudinal overview of the individual's episodic activity A provided push-button allows the patient

to input when a non-GTCS (such as a complex partial seizure) has oc-curred and when medication was taken Ms Nathan mentioned that five pilot and field studies are underway and planned, including a pedi-atric study at LeBonheur Children's Research Hospital, a study at Stanford to integrate the SmartWatch-generated data with My Epilepsy Diary, a study at University of Virginia focused on reduction of adoles-cent anxiety and successful transition to adulthood in an outpatient set-ting, an inpatient study at Boston Children's Hospital of ictal autonomic biomarkers to assess SUDEP risk, and a study at New York University of the usefulness of the data for ongoing outpatient clinical care of patients with epilepsy A submission to the FDA for 510(k) clearance is under preparation

5.6 RTI International esap Kristin H Gilchrist, PhD, Research Scientist, Electronics and Applied Physics Division, RTI International

Dr Gilchrist, Research Scientist, Electronics and Applied Physics Di-vision, RTI International, discussed esap, a system that detects seizures based on a multi-parametric approach and an adaptive algorithm esap senses heart-rate patterns as recorded by electrocardiogram (ECG) as well as movement and respiration An initial study of 28 pa-tients at Children's National Medical Center completed in 2012 using postprocessing analysis demonstrated high detection accuracy for gen-eralized seizure types and 50% detection for partial seizures In late

2013, NIH funding was secured for trials at Children's National Medical Center using less burdensome hardware and technology capable of real-time detection The current prototype consists of a sensor (the Zephyr Biopatch) that is worn on the chest and which communicates via Bluetooth to a processing module An adaptive algorithm that“learns” from its successes and mistakes for a particular patient is being devel-oped and will eventually be integrated into the sensor to send an alarm locally or remotely

5.7 Panel session: seizure detection and alerting devices: are they ready for prime time?

Panel: Daniel Friedman, MD, Moderator, Assistant Professor of

Neurolo-gy, New York University, Comprehensive Epilepsy Center; Tom Stanton, Executive Director, Danny Did Foundation; Michelle Welborn, PharmD, President, Intractable Childhood Epilepsy (ICE) Alliance; Catherine Jacobson, PhD, Post-doctoral Fellow, Pediatric Epilepsy, University of California, San Francisco

Dr Friedman, Assistant Professor of Neurology, New York University, moderated a panel discussion that addressed the roles that noninvasive seizure detection devices may play in the management of epilepsy and seizure safety, the benefits of various detection methods and form fac-tors for different patient populations, the seizure types that are a prior-ity for detection, and optimal performance characteristics of these devices The panel participants were Tom Stanton, Executive Director, Danny Did Foundation; Michelle Welborn, PharmD, President, Intracta-ble Childhood Epilepsy (ICE) Alliance and parent of a child with epilep-sy; and Catherine Jacobson, PhD, Postdoctoral Fellow, Pediatric Epilepsy, University of California, San Francisco, and also a parent of a child with epilepsy

Trang 8

Dr Jacobson stressed the importance of multiparametric systems

for detecting nonconvulsive seizures; especially systems that have

a low false-negative rate and which alert caregivers, particularly

parents whose children have nocturnal seizures Her child, for example,

experiences severe, nocturnal nonconvulsive seizures that last up to

15 min and can be associated with cessation of breathing, and so, on

a nightly basis, she is very concerned about the possibility of SUDEP

Dr Welborn's daughter also has a preponderance of seizures during

sleep She expressed the need for a system that could accurately predict

when a seizure was going to occur so that interventions could be

developed and used to prevent seizures before they started;

conse-quently, seizure-related complications, including SUDEP, would also

be prevented She too commented on the need for systems to detect

sei-zures other than generalized tonic–clonic seizures

Mr Stanton, whose nephew Danny died from SUDEP in 2009, works

through the Danny Did Foundation to educate parents and increase

awareness about the available seizure-detection systems In his

experi-ence, parents want to know which device they should use, how much

particular devices cost, what kinds of data are captured, and which

pa-rameters for seizure activity are measured He said many parents use

video- and audio-based baby monitors (and Dr Jacobson said that she

does as well so that she can see her son and assess if he is having a

sei-zure or not) Mr Stanton feels it is important for medical professionals

to share information with parents and adults with epilepsy about

de-vices in the same manner that they present options related to medicine,

surgery and diet, with the understanding that there is, currently, no

one-size-fits-all device solution

Regarding cost, Dr Welborn said ideally the costs should be covered

by insurance She also encouraged clinicians to consider recommending

private-duty nursing services for children with catastrophic epilepsies

who are at high risk for SUDEP from nocturnal seizures

6 Session 5: late-stage and approved devices—what is new?

This session consisted of 6 presentations about late-stage devices for

the treatment of epilepsy

6.1 Medtronic, Inc DBS therapy for epilepsy Jon Giftakis, PhD, Senior

Principal Scientist, Medtronic Neuromodulation

Dr Giftakis, Senior Principal Scientist, Medtronic Inc., talked about

deep brain stimulation (DBS) Deep brain stimulation therapy for

epi-lepsy is approved in various geographies outside of the U.S In the U.S.,

DBS therapy for epilepsy is under investigation and remains

unap-proved for commercialization The device consists of an implantable

pulse generator connected to stimulating electrodes placed in the

ante-rior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) bilaterally The SANTE trial, which

evaluated DBS therapy for epilepsy, was published in 2010[31]

En-rolled patients have continued to be followed Five years of data

collec-tion has been completed and submitted for publicacollec-tion Discussions

continue with the FDA on options for regulatory approval in the U.S

Medtronic is developing a new neurostimulation device that is currently

in human studies and which has a built-in accelerometer to monitor

motion, patient-specific seizure detection algorithms, and the capability

to both stimulate and sense brain activity concurrently Further, it can

perform evoked potentials to determine if there is neural connectivity

between a therapy electrode and another remote electrode, such as an

electrode in the hippocampus, and the extent of excitability of that

re-mote site, which can in turn be modulated by stimulations by the ANT

electrode[32–34]

6.2 NeuroSigma, Inc eTNS Christopher DeGiorgio, MD, Professor of

Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles

Dr DeGiorgio, representing NeuroSigma, addressed noninvasive

trigeminal nerve stimulation with the eTNS™ system as an epilepsy

therapy He characterized this approach as neuromodulation, without implantation, of neural structures involved in seizures, mood, and atten-tion Mechanism-of-action studies using positron emission tomography have suggested that eTNS reduces metabolism in the temporal-parietal cortex and the mesial temporal regions and increases metabolism in the mesial frontal lobe, a region associated with mood and attention[35] A phase II, randomized, double-blind trial of eTNS was conducted in 50 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who were randomized to active treatment or sham stimulation[36] A 40% responder rate was seen in the active treatment group at 18 weeks compared with a 16% responder rate in the control group The within-group change in responder rate was statistically significant in favor of active treatment (p = 0.0136), and the between-groups change in responder rate approached but did not quite meet statistical significance (p = 0.078) There were also

sig-nificant within-group and between-groups improvement in mood asso-ciated with active treatment His impression was that improvement in mood typically occurs before the improvement in seizure frequency Plans are underway for a pivotal phase III, multicenter trial as adjunctive therapy for drug-resistant complex partial seizures in up to 350 pa-tients, which will exclude data from thefirst 4 weeks of treatment (induction phase), during which epilepsy device trials have historically not shown significant efficacy compared to placebo The planned

prima-ry endpoint is percent change in seizure frequency from baseline to end

of 12 weeks of continued treatment, which begins after the 4-week in-duction period Secondary endpoints include responder rate, RRATIO, mood, and quality-of-life measures The company is pursuing additional potential indications, including attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, major depressive disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder

6.3 University of California, Los Angeles Ultrasound for seizure modulation John Stern, MD, Department of Neurology; Director, Epilepsy Clinical Program and Co-Director, Seizure Disorder Center, University of California, Los Angeles

Dr Stern, Director of the Epilepsy Clinical Program at UCLA, discussed low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFUP) for the treatment

of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) As opposed to high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), low-intensity ultrasound modulates brain activity without imparting significant thermal energy to bone or brain tissue The mechanism is presumed to be exerted by a biomechanical effect

on neuronal membranes which impacts excitability in one direction or another depending on the pulse width and frequency that are used, as demonstrated in animal studies with functional MRI[37–39] An advan-tage of this technique over transcranial magnetic stimulation is that deep brain structures can be targeted In a rodent PTZ model of acute seizures, LIFUP decreased seizures compared to controls, and histologi-cal analysis of the treated brains showed no evidence of tissue destruc-tion, as compared to HIFU, which ablates brain tissue[40] Dr Stern's group plans to study the safety of LIFUP using an MRI-compatible LIFUP device in patients with TLE who are candidates for standard ante-rior temporal lobe resection This patient group was identified in part because the bone overlying the target is relatively thin Study subjects will undergo LIFUP with simultaneous fMRI, and will also have an EEG obtained prior to and after LIFUP and neuropsychological testing after LIFUP After a period of approximately 1 week, the study subjects will undergo the planned anterior temporal lobe resection Resected tissue will be examined histologically to evaluate for any potential histopath-ologic effects of LIFUP

6.4 Visualase, Inc Laser ablation in neurosurgery Ashok Gowda, PhD, Founder and Chief Operating Officer, Visualase, Inc

Dr Gowda, Founder and COO of Visualase, provided an update on their Visualase device, which is cleared for marketing as a surgical tool for soft tissue ablation in neurosurgery Visualase entails a real-time, MRI-guided, laser-based thermal ablation technique that targets the

Trang 9

brain tissue that has been identified as a patient's seizure focus The

disposable laser applicator, 1.65 mm in diameter, consists of a

laser-diffusingfiber and an outer cooling catheter, and is inserted through a

small access hole that is made in the skull Therefore, unlike resective

surgery, this device does not require a craniotomy A workstation

gener-ates the 980-nm diode laser and interfaces with an MRI machine to

provide real-time thermal feedback during the procedure to enable

the surgeon to limit tissue damage to the intended structure Patients

typically remain in the hospital for one night The technology,

origi-nally developed to target brain tumors, has been used in patients

with difficult-to-access deep-seated lesions, such as hypothalamic

hamartomas, and approximately 70 patients have been treated as of

this presentation Dr Gowda said that the neurosurgeon who has

per-formed the largest number of procedures on these lesions has publicly

reported a 93% seizure-free rate among his treated patients Other

tar-gets for this therapy have included mesial temporal structures

(amyg-dala and hippocampus), focal cortical dysplasias, and tubers, including

multiple tubers treated in the same patient, either during the same

ses-sion or serially In total, over 400 patients with epileptic foci have

under-gone the Visualase procedure as of this presentation, and about half are

adults and the other half children Outcome results are being collected

by a number of investigators, though they have not yet been analyzed

6.5 Swedish Neuroscience Institute MRI-guided focused ultrasound for

treatment of mesial TLE John Snell, PhD, Technical Director—Brain

Program, Focused Ultrasound Foundation, Swedish Neuroscience Institute

Dr Snell, Technical Director—Brain Program, Focused Ultrasound

Foundation, discussed MRI-guided focused ultrasound as a therapy for

mesial TLE The device thermally ablates brain tissue and is also

current-ly under evaluation for the treatment of essential tremor, Parkinson's

disease, and other CNS disorders where the targets are deep, such as

the thalamus A study using cadaver skullsfilled with gel-mimicking

phantom material suggests that clinically significant heating can be

pro-duced in regions corresponding to the hippocampus and amygdala In

these experiments, significant heating of the bone underlying the region

corresponding to the hippocampus was observed, especially the petrous

bone, and particularly with 30-second sonication A shielding technique

has been devised to lessen skullfloor heating Based on this feasibility

work, plans are underway to proceed with clinical development and

to move towards lower-frequency transducers and better focusing

tech-niques for lateral targets

6.6 Boston Children's Hospital Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Alexander Rotenberg, MD, PhD, Director, Neuromodulation Program,

Associate Professor of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard

Medical School

Dr Rotenberg, an epileptologist at Boston Children's Hospital,

pre-sented transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for the treatment of

epilepsy Transcranial magnetic stimulation is a method for focal

brain stimulation with small intracranial electrical currents that are

generated by a powerful magneticfield Uniquely among brain

stimula-tion methods, TMS has robust diagnostic and therapeutic capacities that

are relevant to the study and management of epilepsy Transcranial

magnetic stimulation protocols can be divided into three categories:

re-petitive TMS (rTMS), which modulates brain excitability; single-pulse

TMS (spTMS), which evokes a motor response or other observable

change in cortical function; and paired-pulse TMS (ppTMS), which is a

means to assess the excitation:inhibition ratio[41,42] In common

spTMS and ppTMS protocols, a hand-held electromagnetic coil is

posi-tioned next to the scalp and generates a brief, approximately 2-Tesla,

magneticfield, which induces an electrical current in the nearby cortex

[41] When the motor cortex is targeted, the resultant limb movement

can be quantified with surface EMG, which serves as confirmation that

the motor cortex has been stimulated or as a measure of motor cortex

excitability Both clinical and preclinical epilepsy research with TMS are ongoing in Dr Rotenberg's Neuromodulation Program[43]

Clinical-ly, his group uses TMS to localize motor and language function to help the neurosurgeon plan the extent of resection for epilepsy surgery can-didates whose seizure focus is close to motor or language cortical areas

He is also studying the effects of TMS in patients with unilateral or bilat-eral TLE using customized magnetic coils that can induce electrical cur-rents deeper in the brain than is achievable with conventional coils Preliminary data are encouraging in terms of efficacy, tolerability, and safety (adverse events and memory function)

7 Session 6: Nonprofit Organizations, Government, and Crowdfunding—Grants, Awards and Funding to Advance Research to the Next Critical Stage

Panel: Roger J Porter, MD, Moderator, Chief Scientific Officer, Epilepsy Foundation; Jan Buelow, RN, PhD, Vice President, Programs and Research, Epilepsy Foundation; Rajesh Ranganathan, PhD, Director, Office of Transla-tional Research, NaTransla-tional Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke;

H Steve White, PhD, Research Director, Citizen's United for Research in Ep-ilepsy (CURE), Professor and Director, Anticonvulsant Drug Development Program, University of Utah; Bre DiGiammarino, Cause Director, Indiegogo

Dr Porter, CSO, Epilepsy Foundation (EF), chaired a panel session that addressed funding mechanisms to advance epilepsy-related re-search to the next critical stage of development

Dr Buelow presented the new approach to research funding at the EF which resulted from the merger of EF with the Epilepsy Therapy Project The EF is moving from traditional research grants to a strategy

of driving research to bring treatments to patients more quickly To achieve this strategy, successful programs such as new therapies grants are continuing New funding mechanisms are being introduced, includ-ing support for postdocs workinclud-ing in innovative environments and rolling seed grants to address timely topics In addition, working coop-eratively with other key stakeholders through partnerships is a major focus The overall goal of EF, as an organization that advocates for pa-tients with epilepsy and their families, is to be a leader in cutting-edge research to benefit the community

Dr Ranganathan outlined the changes underway at NINDS to sup-port translational research Based on the concept that translation begins and ends with the patient, their guiding principles are to get therapeu-tics to people; establish a fail-early, fail-fast approach to portfolio man-agement; and work with partners to hand off de-risked projects for downstream funding Two programs have supported the bulk of their translational research efforts: Cooperative Program in Translational Research (U01) and the trans-NIH Blueprint Neurotherapeutics (BPN) The NINDS is now evolving these programs to achieve an integrated vi-sion to further advance small molecules, biologics and biotech products, and devices Announcements from NIH about these new programs were released in July 2014, with thefirst grants awarded starting in June 2015

Dr White discussed CURE's research programs, which are based on CURE's mission tofind a cure for epilepsy and to raise awareness of the prevalence and devastation caused by epilepsy— in short, no sei-zures, no side effects, no exceptions As the largest nongovernmental funder of epilepsy research ($20,802,464 in 174 awards between 2000 and 2014), CURE has four priority research areas: the basic mechanisms

of epileptogenesis, the multifaceted causes of epilepsy, the pediatric epilepsy syndromes, and new animal models of epilepsy There is a concerted effort to invest in high-risk, scientifically sound research proposals that have the potential of being transformative The most re-cent initiative, launched in May 2014, is the Epilepsy Genetics Initiative The goal is to develop an exome/genome sequence database of clinical generated sequences and associated phenotyping data The data will

be analyzed every six months andfindings reported back to patients' physicians in an effort to identify the cause of a patient's epilepsy In

Trang 10

addition, the database will serve as a resource for scientists to drive

fur-ther research

Ms DiGiammarino defined crowdfunding as the collective effort of

individuals who network and pool their money, usually via the internet,

to support efforts initiated by other people or organizations Indiegogo

was founded in 2008 and is the world's largest crowdfunding platform

Organizations run campaigns on the platform to amplify their existing

support, demonstrate interest in the organization, spread their message

and raise awareness, and engage the community The EF, for example,

has already partnered with Indiegogo to increase funding for SAMi, an

innovative movement monitor that previously received the EF Shark

Tank award

The session concluded with H Steve White, PhD receiving the

Life-time Accelerator Award, with remarks lauding his accomplishments

offered by Warren Lammert, Chair of the EF Board of Directors; Evelyn

Nussbaum, a member of the CURE Board of Directors; Roger J Porter,

MD, Chief Scientific Officer, EF; and Jacqueline French, Professor of

Neu-rology, New York University Dr White then expressed his profound

thanks and appreciation to the many people who have supported him

over his career

8 Session 7: new directions and opportunities in epilepsy research

In this session, scientists and representatives of the drug and device

private sector provided insight on the trends for the future of epilepsy

therapeutics

8.1 New directions in epilepsy research Daniel Lowenstein, MD, Robert B

and Ellinor Aird Professor and Vice-Chair of Neurology, Director, UCSF

Epilepsy Center, University of California, San Francisco

Dr Lowenstein gave the audience an exciting look into his personal

view of the major advances likely to make a significant impact in the

ep-ilepsyfield in the relatively near term The first area he highlighted was

that of optogenetics This technology uses light-sensitive proteins called

“opsins” to control seizures Scientists can tie the opsin genes to a

promotor that allows them to be incorporated into specific neurons

Once this is done, light can selectively activate specific cells and alter

their excitability Dr Lowenstein described an experiment carried out

by Dr Jeanne Paz and colleagues in which inhibitory opsins were placed

in the thalamic neurons of animals that had seizures due to a focal

cor-tical stroke[44] The investigators then created a closed-loop system

that turned on the light when the EEG showed a seizure, which

inhibited the thalamic neurons and instantly aborted the seizure This

is a very exciting technology that may allow seizure control without

medication

He next discussed the future impact of the explosion of knowledge

about epilepsy genetics He reminded us that in the“first era” of

epilep-sy genetics, the majority of genes discovered that were associated with

epilepsy were genes encoding ion channels This era has been termed

the“channelopathy era” by Dr Ingo Helbig[45] Recently, copy number

variation (CNV) has come to the forefront as a culprit in epileptic

en-cephalopathies[46] Now, Dr Lowenstein believes, as a result of a

num-ber of large genetic scientific collaborations, that we are on the verge of

a new era of genomic discovery For example, recent large-scale efforts

have led to the recognition of de novo mutations explaining upwards of

15% of epileptic encephalopathies[46] In the near future, the Epilepsy

Genetic Initiative (EGI), sponsored by the nonprofit Citizens United for

Research in Epilepsy (CURE) and the NINDS, will allow individuals to

“donate” their genetic data so that genes can be studied and restudied

Next, Dr Lowenstein highlighted thefield of pluripotential stem cell

research, which has now made it feasible to obtain cells from a patient's

skin biopsy, grow outfibroblasts, and then drive the cells to become

in-ducible pluripotential stem cells[47] If the patient has a gene mutation,

one could theoretically correct the mutation and thus modify the cells to

a“healthy state” and put them back in the patient Also, the cells could

be differentiated into neurons, which would create an assay system for the identification of specific drugs that might be effective for the individual from whom the cells were derived A research team led by

Dr Jack Parent has demonstrated that pluripotent stem cells derived from patients with Dravet syndrome and differentiated into neurons have abnormalfiring, a result the team has labeled “human seizures in

a dish”[48]

Dr Lowenstein also discussed the potential of drug screening in zebrafish Dr Scott Baraban and his colleagues have successfully shown that it is feasible to take a specific genetic mutation, such as the SCN1A mutation that leads to Dravet syndrome, place it in zebrafish, and observe the epilepsy phenotype[49] This elegant system allows for

a very effective, high-throughput system for screening candidate drugs, and this has already led to the discovery of some novel compounds that may soon be studied clinically

He then discussed some remarkable studies that have demonstrated the ability of transplanted inhibitory interneurons to prevent epilepto-genesis and associated comorbidities[48,50]and ended by briefly describing the Human Epilepsy Project (HEP), a multicenter observa-tional cohort study of patients with recently diagnosed focal epilepsy that will look for biomarkers of disease activity and treatment resistance [51]

8.2 Improving delivery of therapies in people who need them: an industry perspective Mark Evenstad, Chief Executive Officer, Upsher-Smith Mark Evenstad, the CEO of a privately held and family-owned phar-maceutical company that has a large focus on epilepsy, spoke about the complexity of the current system of getting medication to patients and observed that physician decisions to treat patients with a certain AED do not always translate into the patient actually getting the drug due to is-sues of access and cost He fears that this can often become a“system of

no”, where patients are unable to get optimal therapy This has

motivat-ed Upsher-Smith to implement a new business model designmotivat-ed to im-prove access to effective treatments and reduce health-care costs He encouraged the epilepsy community to work towards greater access op-portunities coupled with a focus on outcomes-driven health care 8.3 The role of corporate and government partnerships in developing new epilepsy products

Panel: Roger J Porter, MD, Moderator, Chief Scientific Officer, Epilepsy Foundation; Santiago Arroyo, MD, PhD, Vice President, Head of Clinical Re-search and Chief Medical Officer, Pharmatherapeutics, Worldwide Research

& Development, Pfizer, Inc.; Roy E Twyman, MD, Vice President and Head, Alzheimer's Disease Area, Janssen Pharmaceuticals R&D LLC; Michael Gold,

MD, Vice-President and Head of the CNS Practice, UCB, Inc.; Frank Fischer, Chief Executive Officer, NeuroPace, Inc

Dr Roger J Porter moderated a panel of four representatives of drug and device companies that have been or are currently focused on epi-lepsy development

Dr Santiago Arroyo, VP, Head of Clinical Research & CMO, Pharmatherapeutics, Worldwide Research & Development, for Pfizer Inc., discussed what big pharma looks for in a new drug for epilepsy

He stated that the top needs were for superior efficacy, differentiation, improved safety and tolerability, no need for titration, broad-spectrum activity, and– ideally – disease modification He went on to say that neurologists in the U.S and Europe believe efficacy is the #1 concern Usually, drugs produce 50% responders, but achieving 100% responders

is more critically important Because epilepsy is heterogeneous, he feels that there is a need for better understanding of who will be a responder, through biomarkers, or a better understanding of genetic variation Unfortunately, one may need tens of thousands of patients to determine this Echoing Dr Lowenstein's previous talk, he discussed the possibility

of treating patients with rare disorders through the use of pluripotent stem cells or as a“disease in a dish” He announced that Pfizer and

Ngày đăng: 23/10/2022, 07:15

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

w