Journal of Critical Scholarship on Higher Education and Student Affairs Volume 4 2019 Colonized and Racist Indigenous Campus Tour: Research-in-Brief Robin Minthorn University of Ne
Trang 1Journal of Critical Scholarship on Higher Education and Student
Affairs
Volume 4
2019
Colonized and Racist Indigenous Campus Tour: Research-in-Brief
Robin Minthorn
University of New Mexico
Christine A Nelson
Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/jcshesa
Part of the Higher Education Commons
Recommended Citation
Minthorn, R S & Nelson, C A (2018) Colonized and racist Indigenous campus tour: Research-in-brief Journal of Critical Scholarship on Higher Education and Student Affairs, 4(2), 7-11
This Research-in-Brief is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals and Magazines at Loyola
eCommons It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Critical Scholarship on Higher Education and Student Affairs by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons For more information, please contact
ecommons@luc.edu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License
Trang 2Colonized and Racist Indigenous
Campus Tour
RESEARCH-IN-BRIEF
Robin Starr Minthorn, University of New Mexico
Christine A Nelson, University of Denver
ISSN 2377-1306
© 2019
All rights reserved for the authors of this study Journal of Critical Scholarship on Higher Education and Student Affairs is an open access journal and all pages are available for copying and distribution under a Creative Commons Attribution/Non-Commercial/
No Derivative works license Any authorized work must be properly attributed to the author(s) Work cannot be used for commercial means or changed in any way
Trang 3Minthorn & Nelson Indigenous Campus Tour
As the title of the article demonstrates, our
con-ceptual contributions are modeled through a
campus tour By framing our contributions
through a campus tour model, non-Indigenous
ad-ministrators and staff who work on college campuses
can begin to better connect to how Indigenous
stu-dents may feel when seeing a campus that overtly
glorifies colonial conquest narratives Throughout the
colonized and racist campus tour, we do not highlight
the colonialist triumphs of the institution; rather, we
uncover the embedded racist and genocidal values
that are often cherished through dominant campus
tours To do this, we seek to provide an Indigenous
community narrative (Gilmore & Smith, 2005;
Mc-Carty, Romero, & Zepeda, 2006) to problematize
how administrators and staff see their campuses and
how they may be centering colonial histories while
silencing Indigenous histories and students in the
process The motivation to develop this conceptual
project is directly influenced by our daily interactions
with Indigenous students, and witness to their
inter-pretations of their experiences on a university
cam-pus Therefore, it is imperative to assert the value of
Indigenous methods and to emphasize storytelling as
in Deloria and Wildcat’s definition of power (2001)
Each portion of this paper holds energy that informs
subsequent sections
An Incomplete History of Higher
Education Institutions
Typically, when describing the student population
that has connections to the land now known as the
United States of America, the term American Indian/
Alaska Native (AI/AN) is ascribed by administrators,
policy makers, and political leaders We purposely
avoid referring to this student population as AI/AN
to push back against the colonial constraints of this
term By erasing the connotation of what it means to
be Indigenous, the meaning of, and the connection to
the land that Indigenous students and communities
have is ignored and replaced with the oppressive value
systems that are in place today The term Indigenous
is not meant to homogenize the unique aspects of each tribal nation, as there are currently over 560 dif-ferent federally-recognized tribes in the United States; rather, it is used in recognition of their commonly held values and connection to the land In relation
to campus climate and inclusive environments, the word “Indigenous” privileges the connection of the first peoples of this land to place and space Evidence
of this argument can be witnessed through Indige-nous value systems and theoretical paradigms (Tuck
& Yang, 2012) To further justify the use of “Indige-nous” we employ one such framework, called Power and Place, to name, criticize, and dismantle the op-pressive system of modern higher education institu-tions through a more complete historical positioning
An Indigenized Theory of Space and Place
(and Broadly)
In the more developed article, we highlight the-ory on space and place broadly and how that is con-ceptualized, and then provide an Indigenous thought
on space and power Highlighting this is essential to understanding how space, specifically on college cam-puses, impacts Indigenous student experiences
Space and Place Broadly
Important to mention in this conversation, are the ways space and place are often conflated to mean the same thing In our view, space and place are rela-tional Space is primarily the physical location, while place is the point of interaction and the ability to process the meaning of those interactions At times these interactions may be linked to a physical space, but not always Sites of Indigenous genocide and as-similation within the United States, particularly the Southwestern part of the United States, are beginning
to acknowledge how discursive spaces are central to understanding the unique historical and contempo-rary struggle of Indigenous populations, especially
in relation to higher education settings There is a growing body of research exploring the historical and present-day struggle over, and conceptualization of,
Trang 4Indigenous spaces within and outside of formal
edu-cation Meanwhile, there is also a growing
acknowl-edgment that space and place inform the
education-al experiences of Native American college students
Minthorn & Marsh (2016) conducted a photo
elic-itation study which sought to understand the lived
experiences of Native American college students, and
found that the experiences of Native American college
students deeply connects place to emotions These
emotions include positive and negative experiences of
higher education institutions, demonstrating the
im-portance for campuses to understand how to create
positive spaces and acknowledge the role of
coloniza-tion in the narrative of the institucoloniza-tion’s success
Indigenous Lens – Power and Place
Indigenous scholars Vine Deloria and Daniel
Wildcat (2001) articulate the relational aspects of
the world through an Indigenous framework called
Power and Place In an abbreviated version of Deloria
and Wildcat’s (2001) contribution, we articulate
how power and place complicate and expand upon
common higher education buzzwords, like sense of
belonging, campus climate, and inclusion
It is through the concepts of Power and Place
that a campus environment is no longer a collection
of inanimate objects (e.g buildings, parking spaces,
dorms, libraries), but a space that consists of energies
constantly interacting The energies that animate and
inanimate objects produce is what Deloria and Wildcat
(2001) call Power Power, through their approach, is
not about domination Rather, it recognizes that all
entities contribute a force to the human experience
Place is where those energies interact and engage with
each other Once again, Deloria and Wildcat (2001)
do not recognize place solely as a physical space, but
a space that considers the historical, emotional, and
socio-political contexts that ultimately create and
inform experiences In terms of studying the context
of higher education at the intersection of Indigenous
student experiences, Power and Place offer an
opportune lens to unpacking the implicit biases and
domination of settler colonialism
The Colonized and Racist Indigenous
Campus Tour
The Colonized and Racist Indigenous Campus Tour begins to overtly name the systemic and oppres-sive values that college campuses perpetuate at the expense of Indigenous students, and other students from communities who have a troubling past with colonization and genocide While hypothetical, the campus tour stops are substantiated by historical re-sources and images found on the University (UNM) campus At each stop, we offer a critique by centering perspectives that challenge settler colonial values and genocidal undertones
Stop 1: “Welcome to Hodgins Hall, UNM’s first building”
By building institutional legacy, campus tour attendees can begin to sense the pride in attending this university Additional facts deemed relevant by campus administrators would further establish the long-standing nature of the institution There con-tinues to be a lack of inclusion or acknowledgment
of the Indigenous peoples of the area when trying to instill a sense of institutional legacy Campus tours continue to embody the notion that the historical founding of UNM occurred on barren land, and from
a need for a higher educational institution to serve the needs of the people Often the people who the institution sought to serve did not include the Indig-enous populations and people whose connection to these lands were there for centuries prior to coloni-zation This is a settler narrative of UNM and one that continues to impact the Indigenous students and communities today
Stop 2: Viewing the Dorms
The experience of viewing student housing is of-ten the selling point of the campus tour and is meant
to entice young people and their families with the wonderful amenities offered on campus However, it
Trang 5Minthorn & Nelson Indigenous Campus Tour
is during this stage of the campus tour where
appro-priation and misuse of Indigenous tribal names are
normalized and strip the Indigenous community of
their ability to assert agency on college campuses In
the case of UNM, the current and historical practices
normalize genocide and colonization, as evidenced by
the Indigenous appropriation of building architecture
and names The full-length article highlights
institu-tional practices that continue to be enacted in today’s
context
Stop 3: Touring the Library
The library tour is at the epicenter of conveying
the university’s prowess in creating and transmitting
knowledge However, upon further investigation, there
continues to be a trend of hostility toward Indigenous
students in spaces The UNM Zimmerman library
is highlighted to demonstrate how institutional
practice actively engages in cultural appropriation and
oppression through architecture and artistic murals
Stop 4: Visiting the President’s Office
Throughout a campus tour, it is common for the
tour guide to mention institutional leaders to draw
upon the sense of pride and prowess an institution
embodies, as is the case with UNM Evidence of this
has been established by previous campus tour stops
This section continues the thread of erasure of
Indig-enous energies and power through colonialism, but
rather than focus on how the dominant narrative has
removed and appropriated Indigenous energies and
power, we focus on the actions Indigenous students
have taken to reclaim an Indigenous community
narrative that pushes back against the organizational
forces that are imbued with colonial and racist
ten-dencies
Next Steps
Through the colonized and racist campus tour, it
is evident that representations on campus are
power-ful, yet oppressive As institutional leaders strive to
make postsecondary institutions more inclusive, it is
imperative to begin the process with the relationship between place and space Though many of the build-ings and images are inanimate from a western view-point, an Indigenous lens demonstrates that each of these items carry energy
Acknowledging Settler Colonialism within Higher Education Historical Narratives
We encourage administrators, practitioners, and researchers to familiarize themselves with settler co-lonialism paradigms and use them to expand histor-ical analysis on their respective campuses In terms
of campus tours, we recommend that each campus evaluate the (un)intended messages embedded in the history and lore told during prospective students’ first experience on their campus
Acknowledging Indigenous Populations
It is imperative that each higher education insti-tution begin to formally acknowledge the Indigenous populations that reside within the proximity of their campuses, and to also acknowledge those whose lands traditionally occupied theses spaces in ceremonies, events and activities held by the institution, particu-larly when physical and visual representation of these populations is absent from the campus and surround-ing community Acknowledgement of Indigenous peoples also creates a space to discuss the level of vis-ibility of Indigenous people and their traditions on campus
Revisit Building Name Policies and Existing Names that Promote Colonialism
Institutional policy needs to be rewritten to for-malize the role of community voice when develop-ing and amenddevelop-ing campus builddevelop-ing names A formal process would create consistency and honor an insti-tution’s commitment to be inclusive of Indigenous communities The failure to institutionalize processes and protocols allows institutional leaders and admin-istrators, particularly those in residential life, to con-tinue the oppressive practices that are rooted in settler
Trang 6Recommended Citation:
Minthorn, R S & Nelson, C.A (2018)
Colonized and racist Indigenous campus
tour Journal of Critical Scholarship on
Higher Education and Student Affairs, 4(1),
73-88
colonialism For institutional leaders to tout
inclusiv-ity, we recommend that policies related to physical
campus space be assessed for inclusivity of Indigenous
peoples After all, all institutions of higher education
reside on traditional Indigenous land
Concluding Thoughts
In conclusion, we offer this piece as an
entry-way to beginning to tell the untold stories of
Indige-nous peoples within historical narratives, symbolism
and present-day stories There is an intimate
connec-tion that Indigenous peoples hold and value regarding
space and land, that is not tied to ownership, rather,
it is ancestral and spiritual We hope that by bringing
the perils of history and current stories of UNM to
light, it will encourage others to investigate how
set-tler colonialism pervades almost every aspect of
insti-tutional memory and life Let us not forget that what
seemed to be “barren and desolate” actually held
cen-turies of connections to plants, medicines, creation
stories and other meaningful connections that are
for-gotten in the current narratives of higher education
institutions
Author Biographies
Robin Starr Minthorn, Ph.D. (Kiowa/Umatilla/
Nez Perce/Apache and Assini-boine), is an Associate Professor
at the University of New Mex-ico in Educational Leadership and Native American Studies
Dr Minthorn is the coordi-nator for the Native American Leadership in Education (NALE) doctoral cohorts in
the Educational Leadership Program and currently
serves as the Kiva Club co-advisor Her research
in-terests include: Indigenous leadership in higher
edu-cation, intergenerational Indigenous leadership
per-spectives and Native college student experiences She
is co-editor of the “Indigenous Leadership in Higher
Education” published through Routledge and
“Re-claiming Indigenous Research in Higher Education” published through Rutgers University Press
Christine A Nelson, Ph.D (Diné and Laguna
Pueblo), is an Assistant Professor at the University of Denver’s Morgridge College of Education – Higher Education Department The research she engages with challenges the status quo of higher education for Indigenous students and communities Her primary research interest focuses on finance in higher education, which ranges from student experiences
to policy Chris also infuses Indigenous perspectives and methods to explore the long-term impacts of pre-college access programs Ultimately, as first-generation college student, she works for underserved communities and their students, who deserve every chance to access, persist, and complete a higher education degree