Impor-tantly, MT1-MMP activates proMMP2 via a mecha-nism in which the tissue inhibitor of MMPs, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase TIMP-2, bound to the MT1-MMP catalytic domain acts a
Trang 1Localizing matrix metalloproteinase activities in the
pericellular environment
Gillian Murphy1 and Hideaki Nagase2
1 Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK
2 Department of Matrix Biology, The Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology Division, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK
Introduction
Timely alteration of extracellular matrix (ECM)
com-position and the pericellular environment is essential in
many biological processes such as embryonic
develop-ment, morphogenesis, cell migration, differentiation,
apoptosis and tissue remodeling In diseases such as
cancer [1], atheroma, arthritis, neurodegenerative
dis-eases and various connective tissue disdis-eases, these
pro-cesses become dysregulated Matrix metalloproteinases
(MMPs) are pivotal effectors of the cellular
microenvi-ronment and modulate cellular activities and tissue
structure throughout development and physiological
and pathological remodeling [2] All 23 human MMPs
harbor signals that direct them to the endoplasmic
reticulum and hence to the cell surface or to secretion
The extracellular activities of the MMPs are multiple, cleaving not only the components of the ECM, but also many of the bioactive molecules at or around the cell surface Because there is considerable overlap in substrate specificity amongst the MMPs, mechanisms
to preclude redundancy exist A number of post-secre-tory regulations of MMP activities have been described [3] Specific MMPs do have greater affinity for specific substrates and the concentrations of the active enzyme and the preferred substrate relative to other substrates may be determinants of efficacy [4] The mechanisms
by which cells can regulate their function in a spatial fashion pose intriguing questions and are clearly of critical importance in relation to remodeling events,
Keywords
CD44; collagen; extracellular matrix; integrin;
proteoglycan; receptor; tetraspanin
Correspondence
H Nagase, Department of Matrix Biology,
The Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology
Division, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial
College London, London W6 8LH UK
Fax: +44 02083834488
Tel: 02083834994
E-mail: h.nagase@imperial.ac.uk;
h.nagase@ic.ac.uk
(Received 26 June 2010, revised 15
September 2010, accepted 22 September
2010)
doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07918.x
Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a group of structurally related pro-teolytic enzymes containing a zinc ion in the active site They are secreted from cells or bound to the plasma membrane and hydrolyze extracellular matrix (ECM) and cell surface-bound molecules They therefore play key roles in morphogenesis, wound healing, tissue repair and remodeling in dis-eases such as cancer and arthritis Although the cell anchored membrane-type MMPs (MT-MMPs) function pericellularly, the secreted MMPs have been considered to act within the ECM, away from the cells from which they are synthesized However, recent studies have shown that secreted MMPs bind to specific cell surface receptors, membrane-anchored proteins
or cell-associated ECM molecules and function pericellularly at focussed locations This minireview describes examples of cell surface and pericellu-lar partners of MMPs, as well as how they alter enzyme function and cellular behaviour
Abbreviations
ECM, extracellular matrix; GPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol; HB-EGF, heparin-binding epidermal growth factor; LRP, low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase, MT-MMP, membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase; TGF, transforming growth factor; TIMP, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase.
Trang 2directed cell migration and the directed interactions
with other cells Among all the MMPs, six are
mem-brane-type (MT)-MMPs that have specific domains
sequestering them at the cell membrane The majority
of MMPs are secreted into the extracellular space,
although there is accumulating evidence that they may
be recruited back to the local cell environment by
interactions with cell surface proteins and the
pericellu-lar matrix (Table 1) This minireview describes some of
the ingenious devices that have been constructed to
focus and regulate the proteolytic activity of the
MMPs in the pericellular environment
MMP domain structure
Besides the archetypal secretory signal sequence,
regu-latory propeptide and catalytic domain, the MMPs
have a C-terminal hemopexin-like domain, with the
exception of MMP-7, MMP-23 and MMP-26 MMP-2
and MMP-9 also have three repeats of the fibronectin
type II motif inserted into the catalytic domain There
are six membrane-anchored MMPs, termed ‘mem-brane-type’ (MT); four are transmembrane proteins with short cytoplasmic domains (MT1-, MT2-, MT3-and MT5-MMP) MT3-and two with glycosylphosphatidyli-nositol (GPI) anchors (MT4- and MT6-MMP) [5] Although many studies initially focused on the cata-lytic domain, particularly in relation to the develop-ment of active site inhibitors, it is now appreciated that the extracatalytic domains of the MMPs also play important roles in their function The N-terminal pro-peptide acts to maintain the latency of the MMPs by the presence of a cysteine residue in the active site coordinated to the catalytic zinc ion [6–9] The activa-tion mechanism (known as the ‘cysteine switch’) involves proteolytic cleavages of the propeptide caus-ing a destabilization of the cysteine–zinc interaction [10] The extra catalytic domains of the MMPs can contribute to macromolecular substrate specificity; the fibronectin type II domains of MMP-2 and MMP-9 are important for the cleavage of denatured collagens, type IV collagen and elastin [11,12] The hemopexin
Table 1 Cell surface-binding partners of MMPs Some representative examples of the associations of MMPs with cell surface molecules and the domain involved in interactions are shown It is possible that such interactions confer site specificity for MMP action and could form the basis for therapeutic targeting outside the catalytic cleft.
Trang 3domain of MMP-2 was found to bind chemokines
such as monocyte chemoattractant protein-3 and hence
facilitated its cleavage [13] The hemopexin domains of
the collagenolytic MMPs (MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-8,
MMP-13 and MT1-MMP) are essential for cleaving
native triple helical collagen monomers It has been
shown that collagenases locally unwind the triple helix
to allow access of the individual a chains to the active
site center [14] Hence, the collagen-binding site may
be composed of elements from both the catalytic
and the hemopexin domains It is also clear that
inter-domain flexibility is key for the specificity of the
colla-genases and possibly other MMPs [15]
Cell membrane-anchored MMPs
Unlike most of the soluble MMPs,
membrane-anchored MT-MMPs are already active at the cell
sur-face because they are cleaved intracellularly by
furin-like proprotein convertases at their specific recognition
sequence, RX[R⁄ K]R, located at the C-terminus of the
propeptide [16–18] MT1-MMP is the best studied of
this subfamily and is known to promote cell invasion
and motility by degrading pericellular ECM molecules
and eliciting the ‘shedding’ of CD44 and syndecan1
ectodomains It also degrades a plethora of other
extracellular and cell surface proteins [18,19]
Impor-tantly, MT1-MMP activates proMMP2 via a
mecha-nism in which the tissue inhibitor of MMPs, tissue
inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-2, bound to the
MT1-MMP catalytic domain acts as a ‘receptor’ for
proMMP-2 at the cell surface In this system, modules
within blades III and IV of the hemopexin domain of
proMMP-2 bind to the C-terminal domain of TIMP-2
and this ternary complex formation allows proteolytic
activation of proMMP-2 by an adjacent molecule of
MT1-MMP that is free of TIMP-2 MT1-MMP can
also activate proMMP-13 [20] It is therefore regarded
as one of the key factors influencing the input of the
cellular microenvironment into cell signaling pathways
[18] Dimerization of MT1-MMP via the hemopexin
domain is essential for both collagenolysis and
effec-tive proMMP-2 activation and it may be the basis
of its function as an oligomer at the cell surface [21]
Miyamori et al [22], on the other hand, reported that
claudin-5 at endothelial cell tight junctions recruits
MT1-MMP and proMMP-2 on the cell surface to
achieve elevated focal concentrations, leading to
enhanced proMMP-2 activation independent of
TIMP-2 Similar enhancements of proMMP-2
activa-tion were reported for other MT-MMPs, suggesting
that clustering is an important factor for proMMP-2
activation [22]
To achieve focal degradation, cells localize MT1-MMP at lamellipodia, the migration front of the cells [23–25] This localization may be achieved by interac-tion with CD44 and integrins (see below) MMP-2 is also enriched in invadopodia and it has been suggested that it could be bound to MT1-MMP through TIMP-2,
as described above
MT1-MMP is largely sequestered intracellularly in membrane vesicles and may be derived from newly synthesized material, or from surface enzyme recycled through endocytosis Studies to determine MT1-MMP localization in invading cells are ongoing, although they have identified pathways necessary for the forma-tion of invasive structures and the movement of secre-tory vesicles involving microtubules and Rab proteins [26–29] The short 20 amino acid cytoplasmic domain
of MT1-MMP appears to be of importance in linking the enzyme proteolytic activity to efficient cell migra-tion and invasion; several studies have shown that deletion of this domain markedly reduces cell migra-tion triggered by the enzyme without affecting the cell surface proteolytic activity of the enzyme [30–33] However, there is no universal agreement on this point because, in some over-expression studies, MT1-MMP with the cytoplasmic domain deleted can efficiently drive cell migration through collagen [34] This may be
a result of overloading of the secretory pathway with
an excess of enzyme, over-riding the normal regulatory mechanisms In the same study, the transmembrane domain was found to be essential because secreted col-lagenases such as MMP-1 or MT1-MMP without the transmembrane domain did not drive cell invasion through a 3D collagen matrix Membrane-anchoring
of either MMP-1, or even the catalytic domain of MT1-MMP alone, could drive collagenolytic migra-tion, albeit with considerably less efficiency than MT1-MMP itself [34] Cell invasion through a fibrin gel also required intact membrane tethered MT1-MMP, although the tethered catalytic domain alone was not effective in this case [34] How the hemopexin domain interacts with a fibrin substrate has not been studied
Of the other MT-MMPs, only MT2-MMP has been shown to play a similar role to MT1-MMP in cell invasion of collagen I gels [35] Studies looking at cell invasion through intact basement membranes have shown that MT2-MMP and MT3-MMP, as well as MT1-MMP, may have important roles [36] These enzymes can degrade laminin and type IV collagen and the importance of membrane tethering and the lack
of requirement for the hemopexin domain for cell invasion were demonstrated The two GPI-anchored members of the MT-MMP family, MT4-MMP and MT6-MMP, have a broad substrate repertoire that is
Trang 4still being defined, including ECM proteins, and have
been shown to activate proMMP-2 and proMMP-9
MT4-MMP also activates proADAMTS-4 [37] It is
considered that MT4 and MT6-MMP may have
unique roles, related to their localization in specific
cel-lular microenvironments via the GPI anchor within
lipid rafts of cell membranes [16] GPI-MT-MMP
activity at the cell surface is also regulated by
endocy-tosis and recycling, as reported for MT1-MMP [16]
There is also some preliminary evidence for
homodi-merization of the GPI-MT-MMPs, although this has
not been studied in depth [16]
Integrins
Studies of wound healing in keratinocyte monolayers
using blocking-antibodies indicated that the proteolytic
activity of MMP-1 is required for migration of human
keratinocytes on native collagen I Upon wounding,
keratinocytes contact dermal collagen I fibrils and the
interaction with a2b1 integrin stimulates the cell to
produce proMMP-1 [38] Biochemical and cell-based
studies have further shown that both proMMP-1 and
MMP-1 bind the a2b1 integrin via the I domain of the
a2 integrin subunit and that the linker peptide and the
hemopexin domain of MMP-1 are required for optimal
binding [39] Basal keratinocytes constitutively express
the a2b1 integrin on their basolateral surfaces and, in
wounds, this receptor accumulates at the forward-basal
tip of migrating keratinocyte in contact with dermal
type I collagen [38,39] Because the a2b1 integrin binds
native collagen I with high affinity, clustering this
inte-grin at contact points would tightly tether resting
keratinocytes to the dermis, although MMP-1 bound
to a2b1 integrin focally cleaves the collagen matrix
This results in denaturation of collagen fragments,
which weakens the adhesion to the matrix and allows
keratinocyte migration [38,39] Hence, a2b1 integrin,
MMP-1 and collagen substrate coordinate together to
drive and regulate migrating keratinocyte during
re-epithelialization This phenomenon, however, has
not been further studied in vivo, probably because
MMP-13, the predominant collagenase in mice, does
not appear to interact with integrins It is also not
known whether a similar system operates in other cell
types, although other epithelial cells that move in two
dimensions may utilize MMP-1 in a similar way
MT1-MMP can be colocalized with b1 integrin in
some cell types [40,41], and this appears to regulate its
function It is not clear whether this the result of a
direct interaction, although these reports suggest that
MT1-MMP and b1 integrin are functioning in the
same area on the cell surface In ovarian cancer cells,
antibody-induced clustering of a3b1 integrin stimulates polarized trafficking and cell surface expression of MT1-MMP, colocalization to aggregated integrin com-plexes and activation of pro-MMP-2 In the case of endothelial cells, MT1-MMP is up-regulated and colo-calizes with b1 integrin at the intercellular contacts of confluent cells on b1 integrin-interacting matrices such
as collagen I, fibronectin or fibrinogen This up-regula-tion was also shown to be the result of an impairment
of internalization of the cell surface MT1-MMP [42]
On migrating endothelial cells, MT1-MMP was found
to be associated with avb3 integrin at motility-associ-ated structures and the two proteins could be co-im-munoprecipitated [42] It has also been reported that the integrin avb3 binds MMP-2 via its hemopexin domain [43,44] and it is colocalized with degraded col-lagen type I [45] Physical interaction of MT1-MMP with avb3 can process the av subunit and increases outside-in signaling via avb3 [46] Furthermore, it is possible that MMP-2 and MT1-MMP activities could
be colocalized through their avb3-binding to modify integrin-ligand interactions rapidly in situ [42,47] The isolated hemopexin domain of MMP-2 was reported to block angiogenesis in model systems and to inhibit the interaction of MMP-2 with integrin avb3 [43,44] How-ever, there remains some controversy on the direct binding of avb3 and the MMP-2 hemopexin domain [48,49] Cells expressing avb3 could not use MMP-2 coated surfaces either to attach or spread It is possible that specific forms of the integrin and MMP-2 are involved in binding interactions and that this cannot always be recapitulated in vitro
MT1-MMP has been described as interacting with avb8 to activate transforming growth factor (TGF)-b1 It has been proposed that, upon ligation of avb8 with latent TGFb (latency associated peptide-b1⁄ latency-associated peptide-b1), avb8 and MT1-MMP become closely associated and form a complex on the cell surface [50] The mechanism for this is unknown, although it is postulated that the interaction may be indirect because the cell surface appears to be required for productive interactions and the secreted forms of avb8 and MT1-MMP did not activate
TGF-b [50] Because the localization of MT1-MMP in latency-associated peptide-b1 substrate contacts is dependent on the presence of b8, it is likely that avb8–latent TGF b interaction initiates the recruit-ment of MT1-MMP [50]
Tetraspanins Tetraspanins are evolutionarily conserved membrane proteins that tend to associate laterally with one
Trang 5another and to cluster dynamically with numerous
partner proteins in membrane microdomains
Conse-quently, members of this family are involved in the
coordination of intracellular and intercellular
pro-cesses, including signal transduction, cell proliferation,
adhesion and migration Recent characterization of
tet-raspanin-enriched microdomains suggests that they
might be specially suited for the regulation of avidity
of adhesion receptors and the compartmentalization of
enzymatic activities Shiomi et al [51] reported that
CD151 binds to the propeptide of proMMP-7 and
actives the enzyme on the cell surface It is considered
to be the result of conformational changes in
proM-MP-7 induced by interacting with CD151, thus
facilitating a spontaneous activation of proMMP-7
pericellularly The tetraspanin CD151 may also be a
key regulator of MT1-MMP function at the surface of
endothelial cells MT1-MMP colocalizes with
tetra-spanin CD151 and its associated partner a3b1 integrin
at lateral endothelial cell junctions Biochemical and
fluorescence resonance energy transfer analyses by
Yan˜ez-Mo´ et al [52] showed that the MT1-MMP
hemopexin domain associates with CD151 and forms
an a3b1 integrin⁄ CD151 ⁄ MT1-MMP ternary complex
Ablation of CD151 expression enhanced
MT1-MMP-mediated activation of MMP-2, although collagen
degradation was reduced around the cell periphery
MT1-MMP subcellular localization and its inclusion
into detergent-resistant membrane domains, as well as
association with the a3b1 integrin, were affected [52]
Thus, CD151 can finely regulate not only proteolytic
activities of MT1-MMP, but also the sites of action
through complex formation with a3b1
Another tetraspanin, CD63, a component of late
endosomal and lysosomal membranes, interacts with
MT1-MMP directly through the N-terminus of CD63
and the hemopexin domain [53] and accelerates
inter-nalization and lysosomal degradation of MT1-MMP
[53], thus acting as a further regulator of MT1-MMP
trafficking
CD44
The hyaluronan receptor CD44, of which some forms
are heavily glycosylated and sulfated, is an important
mediator of cell migration and tissue remodeling
events CD44v(3,8-10) was reported to be associated
with active MMP-9 within the invadopodia of
meta-static breast cancer cells [54] The complex links to
ankyrin and the membrane-associated actomyosin
con-tractile system required for ‘invadopodia’ formation,
thus coupling matrix degradation and tumor cell
migration during breast cancer progression [54] Yu
and Stamenkovic [55] also showed that active MMP-9 can associate with CD44 on mammary carcinoma cells and activate latent TGFb TIMP-1 binding to a proM-MP-9–CD44 complex is also a prerequisite for anti-apoptotic signaling in erythroid cells [56] Redondo-Munoz et al [57] found that CD44v and a4b1integrin colocalize with MMP-9 in invading lymphoid cells, and MMP-9 produced by chronic lymphocytic leuke-mia B cells is considered to contribute to their tissue infiltration by degrading extracellular and membrane-anchored substrates This interaction is mediated by the hemopexin domain Binding of soluble or immobi-lized MMP-9, or the MMP-9 hemopexin domain, to a4b1 integrin and CD44v prevents B-cell leukemia lymphocyte apoptosis by inducing Lyn activation, STAT3 phosphorylation and Mcl-1 up-regulation [58], although the target(s) of MMP-9 activity in this con-text are not yet known
As discussed above, CD44 also interacts with MT1-MMP, and directs the presence of MT1-MMP in lamellipodia of the invasive front of migrating cells [25] This localization may be achieved by interaction with CD44 through the hemopexin domain of the enzyme and stem region of CD44, and CD44 associ-ates with F-actin through its cytoplasmic domain by interacting with Ezrin⁄ Radixin ⁄ Moesin proteins MT1-MMP is also localized to F-actin-rich invasive struc-tures found in some cells, termed invadopodia, and detailed time-lapse studies have demonstrated that cortactin and actin aggregates at membrane regions adherent to matrix where MT1-MMP accumulates [26] Matrix degradation leads to cortactin dissociation from the area, although MT1-MMP remains associated with foci of degraded matrix [26] Hence, proteolytic shedding of CD44 from the cell surface by MT1-MMP promotes cell migration on a hyaluronan based 2D matrix [59] MT1-MMP may therefore act to regulate the adhesion properties of cellular lamellipo-dia Again, the hemopexin domain of MT1-MMP is required for CD44 shedding and cell migration to occur in this model Marrero-Diaz et al [60] carried out time-lapse confocal microscopy and fluorescence resonance energy transfer imaging of carcinoma cells embedded in a 3D collagen I matrix containing hyal-uronan and showed that MT1-MMP interacted with CD44 preferentially at the trailing edge of the invading tumor cells and that the proteolytic processing of the CD44 extracellular domain was enriched in the retracting rear ends It was concluded that the role of MT1-MMP in CD44-mediated tumor-cell invasion is cell retraction, although CD44 is not essential for MT1-MMP-mediated invasion into the 3D matrix of hyaluro-nan-collagen
Trang 6Membrane proteoglycans and
glycosaminoglycans
Proteoglycans, which contain either heparan sulfate or
chondroitin sulfate glycosaminoglycan chains attached
to a protein core, are an important class of cell surface
and ECM molecules regulating activation and activity
of MMPs Many MMPs are bound to tissues through
interaction with glycosaminoglycans, and MMP-7 is
one of the most tightly bound MMP-7 is often found
to be bound to heparan sulfate proteoglycans on or
around epithelial cells and in the underlying basement
membrane, and it may be released by heparinase
diges-tion [61] When it is bound to heparin, the activity of
MMP-7 is greatly enhanced Two putative
heparin-binding peptides were identified near the C- and
N-ter-minal regions of proMMP-7, although molecular
mod-eling suggested an extensive binding track crossing
multiple peptide strands Evidence was also found for
the binding of MMP-2, -9, -13 and -16 [48,61] As
sug-gested by Ra and Parks [4], binding of those MMPs to
heparan sulfate in the extracellular space could prevent
the loss of secreted enzyme, provide a reservoir of
latent enzyme, and facilitate cellular sensing and
regu-lation of enzyme levels Furthermore, binding to the
cell surface could position the enzyme for directed
pro-teolytic attack for activation of (or by) other MMPs
and for regulation of other cell surface proteins
Forms of the hyaluronan receptor CD44 bearing
sulfated glycosaminoglycans bind MMP-9, as discussed
above Yu et al [62] reported that such forms of
CD44 recruit proteolytically active MMP-7 and the
substrate heparin-binding epidermal growth factor
pre-cursor (proHB-EGF) via the sulfated sugars, forming
a complex on the surface of tumor cell line The
pro-HB-EGF within this complex is processed by MMP-7,
and the resulting mature HB-EGF engages and
acti-vates its receptor, ErbB4, leading to cell survival In
CD44() ⁄ )) mice, postpartum uterine involution is
accelerated and maintenance of lactation is impaired
as a result of altered MMP-7 localization and
decreased ErbB4 activation in both uterine and
mam-mary epithelia [62] Because MMP-7 is known as an
important regulator of many proteolytic events at the
cell surface, it is possible that CD44 interaction could
be a means of localizing the enzyme to key sites It is
likely that charge interactions with sulfated
glycosami-noglycans of CD44 are important, although the
mole-cular nature of this is not fully understood
Syndecans and glypicans are other examples of
membrane associated proteoglycans with highly
sul-fated glycosaminoglycan chains that regulate cell
sur-face events by interactions with effectors, including
growth factors, integrins and proteinase inhibitors Endometrial epithelial cells and carcinoma cells from various tissues bind to active MMP-7 at the cell sur-face MMP-7-binding could be decreased by interfering with heparan sulfate proteoglycans, and by interacting with TIMP-2 or a synthetic MMP inhibitor The bound MMP-7 remains fully active towards a macro-molecular substrate but is resistant to inhibition by TIMP-2 [63] MMP-9 associated with the heparan sul-fate chains of the GPI-anchored cell surface proteogly-can glypiproteogly-can of murine colon adenocarcinoma cells [64] This allows the accumulation of MMP-9 on the tips of invasive protrusions of the cells and promotes their motility Treatment of the cells with heparitinase-I
or heparin released MMP-9 from the cell surface, which resulted in the suppression of their motility to a level similar to that exhibited by an MMP inhibitor However, the heparan sulfate-interacting domain of MMP-9 is not known Iida et al [48] reported that melonoma cell specific cell surface chondrotin sulfate proteoglycan enhances the activation of proMMP-2 by MT3-MMP and cell invasion in vitro The complex is formed through glycosaminoglycan components inter-acting with the catalytic domain of MT3-MMP and the hemopexin domain of proMMP-2 This effect was also observed with isolated chondroitin 4-sulfate, but not chondroitin 6-sulfate, hyaluronan or heparin, sug-gesting that a specific sulfation pattern is important in those reactions
Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) and Ku LRP is a member of the low-density lipoprotein recep-tor superfamily and a heterodimeric endocytic receprecep-tor for a large number of proteins, and also has signaling properties LRP internalizes many diverse ligands, including a2-macroglobulin-proteinase complexes, sev-eral serine proteinases, proteinase inhibitors and pro-teinase–inhibitor complexes [65] MMP-2, MMP-9 and MMP-13 have been reported to be endocytosed by LRP, introducing another level of regulation of peri-cellular proteolysis by MMPs ProMMP-2 by itself has
a relatively low affinity to LRP but forms complexes with either thrombospondin [66] or TIMP-2 [67] that are readily endocytosed by LRP The study of proMMP-2–TIMP-2 complex internalization indicated that both the fibronectin II domain of MMP-2 and TIMP-2 have independent binding sites in LRP, which enhances the uptake of the complex [67] ProMMP-9 is internalized as the proMMP-9–TIMP-1 complex [68] Internalization of MMP-13 is initiated by binding to
an unidentified 170 kDa receptor and the enyzme is
Trang 7transferred to LRP for internalization and intracellular
degradation [69] Troeberg et al [70] reported that
TIMP-3, is also internalized by LRP, which also
requires a sulfated proteoglycan as a co-receptor
The hemopexin domain of MMP-9 contains a
bind-ing site for LRP-1 and LRP-2 and these receptors have
been implicated in regulating MMP-9 activity [71] The
64 amino acid linker region of MMP-9 between the
catalytic and hemopexin domains is heavily
O-glycosy-lated The linker region is required to correctly orient
the hemopexin domain for inhibition by TIMP-1 and
internalization by LRP-1 and LRP-2, hence regulating
active enzyme bioavailability [71,72]
Another interesting molecule interacting with MMP-9
on the cell surface is the heterodimeric DNA repair
molecule Ku (Ku70⁄ Ku80) Ku not only is present in
the cytosol and nucleus, but also is found on cell
surface of certain cell types Monferran et al [73]
reported that MMP-9 is bound to Ku on the leading
and tailing edge of the leukemic cell surface and helps
the cell to migrate into type IV collagen matrices,
indi-cating the importance of the membrane bound Ku in
ECM turnover The interaction of MMP-9 and Ku is
mediated by the hemopexin domain of MMP-9 and
Ku80
Emmprin
Emmprin, CD147 (Basigin) is an important cell surface
bound MMP regulator It is a transmembrane
glyco-protein with two Ig-like domains [74] It was identified
as an MMP-inducer expressed on epithelial cells and is
known to enhance cell proliferation and multidrug
resistance by promoting hyaluronan synthesis and
angiogenesis via the augmentation of vascular
endothe-lial growth factor production [75] It interacts with
sev-eral molecules including caveolin, cyclophilin 60 and
monocarboxylate transporters [75] Although epithelial
Emmprin stimulates surrounding stromal cells to
pro-duce a number of proMMPs, proMMP-1 was found
to interact with Emmprin on human lung carcinoma
cells [76], and both proMMP-1 and active MMP-1
bind to Emmprin on glandular epithelium in the
human endometrium [77] Although the activity of
MMP-1 on the cell surface has not been examined, it
may be another way to specifically regulate pericellular
collagenolytic activity
Endo180
Endo180 was originally identified as constitutively
recycling cell surface receptor [78] It was also found
as a macrophage mannose receptor type C lectin [79]
and as urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor associated protein [80] It has also been characterized
as a collagen-binding and collagen-internalization receptor [81] MT1-MMP was shown to have a critical role in collagen phagocytosis [82] and recent studies by Messaritou et al [83] have demonstrated that Endo180
is a negative regulator of MT1-MMP activity and thus down-regulates MT1-MMP-dependent MMP-2 activa-tion in HT1080 cells Depleactiva-tion of Endo180 by siRNA led to the accumulation of collagen in the medium as a result of reduced collagen endocytosis, and resulted in the collagen-dependent increase of MT1-MMP activity
on the cell surface However, Messaritou et al [83] could not show direct binding of Endo180 and MT1-MMP, suggesting that the effect of Endo180 on the regulation of MT1-MMP activity involves another molecule Their study indicates an intricate coordina-tion of collagen clearance in the pericellular environ-ment mediated both collagen internalization and regulated MT1-MMP activity
Cholesterol sulfate MMP-7 cleaves many ECM molecules and other pro-teins in the cellular microenvironment and is consid-ered to have ‘sheddase’ activities comparable with those of the disintegrin MMPs It is known to induce adhesion of colon cancer cells by the cleavage of cell surface proteins, although binding of MMP-7 to cell surface cholesterol sulfate is essential for this activity and the induction of cell aggregation [84] The choles-terol sulfate-binding site has been identified on the opposite side of the catalytic cleft of MMP-7 [85], and
it has been proposed that this makes it possible for the enzyme to cleave both cell surface protein substrates and those in the pericellular ECM
Pericellular ECM MMP-binding to the extracellular matrix has been noted in many immunohistochemical and biochemical extraction studies and examples of the potential effects
of matrix macromolecule association with MMPs on the activity of the latter have been postulated Because many ECM proteins are associated with the cell sur-face, it is likely that these act as important binding sites and modulators of pericellular proteolysis The gelatinases, MMP-2 and MMP-9, were the first MMPs
to be recognized as binding to fibrillar collagens such
as type I and their denatured forms within the ECM
It was shown that this was effected by a ‘gelatin-bind-ing domain’, consist‘gelatin-bind-ing of three repeats of the fibro-nectin type II motif inserted into the catalytic domain
Trang 8[11,86] Subsequently, proMMP-9 and its TIMP-1
complex were shown to bind with high affinity to a
number of cell lines via cell surface a2 chain of type
IV collagen [87] Binding of pro-MMP-9 to cells does
not result in zymogen activation and is not followed
by ligand internalization, even after complex formation
with TIMP-1 Interestingly, the proenzyme does not
bind to secreted triple-helical collagen IV It was
pro-posed that this unique interaction between pro-MMP-9
and a2(IV) may play a role in targeting the zymogen
to cell matrix contacts and in the degradation of the
collagen IV network Preliminary studies have
impli-cated the gelatin-binding domain of MMP-9 in a2(IV)
collagen-binding [88] However, the nature of a2(IV)
collagen association to cells is itself not clear Owen
et al [89] showed that MMP-9 secreted by activated
PMN leucocytes binds to the cell surface by an
unknown mechanism Significantly, the bound enzyme
is fully functional proteolytically, although is no longer
regulated by TIMP-1 or TIMP-2 Bannikov et al [90]
found that the gelatinolytic activity of MMP-9 could
be detected in situ in tissue sections of term placenta,
However, all the enzyme extracted from this tissue was
in a proform They found that purified proMMP-9
acquired activity against gelatin substrates, although
its propeptide remained intact These results suggest
that, although activation of all known MMPs in vitro
is accomplished by proteolytic processing of the
pro-peptide, other mechanisms, such as binding to a ligand
or to a substrate, may lead to a disengagement of the
propeptide from the active center of the enzyme,
caus-ing its activation This observation could have
implica-tions for the association of other MMPs to cell surface
molecules Bone sialoprotein is a member of a family
of glycoprotein ligands for integrins and can therefore
be cell surface associated Bone sialoprotein has
been shown to induce limited gelatinase activity in
proMMP-2 without removal of the propeptide and to
restore enzymatic activity to MMP-2 previously
inhib-ited by TIMP-2 [91]
More recently Freise et al [87] found that proforms
of MMPs were closely associated with collagenous
sep-tae in fibrotic liver tissue and that the triple helical
domain of a2 chain of collagen VI bound with
nanom-olar affinity to procollagenases (proMMP-1, -8 and
-13) and proMMP-3, as well as proMMP-2 and -9
The binding of collagen VI to those zymogens or
acti-vated MMPs reduced the levels of auto-activation and
enzymatic activities, respectively, with the exception of
an observed increase in proMMP-2 activation and
MMP-2 activity It was suggested that the a2(VI) chain
modulates MMP availability by sequestering proMMPs
in the ECM and blocking proteolytic activity Using
tandem affinity expression tagged MMP-13 hinge-hemopexin domains as a bait, Zhang et al [92] found that they bound TIMP-1 and a2-macroglobulin, fibro-nectin, type VI collagen, xylosyltransferase 1, decorin, syndecan 4 and serglycin in the medium of human chondrocytes in culture Although the consequences of these interactions remain to be demonstrated, studies suggest that MMP-13 activity may be either targeted
at a more specific site in the connective tissue matrix,
or that matrix proteins may regulate its activity during cartilage degradation
The mechanisms of interaction of the collagenases with fibrillar collagen substrates is key to directed cleavage As exemplified with MT1-MMP, cell surface collagenolysis is implicated in directional cell move-ment along the collagen fibrils In the tissue, interstitial collagen forms insoluble fibrils that are highly resistant
to digestion, even by collagenases such as MMP-1, MMP-13 and MT1-MMP This may be particularly a result of collagenase cleavage sites in collagen fibrils being covered mainly by the C-terminal telopeptide of the neighboring collagen molecule, as shown in the 3D structure of rat tendon collagen fibrils recently solved using X-ray diffraction analysis [93,94] This suggests that the removal of the C-telopeptide or its structural alteration needs to take place before collagenase can act on collagen fibrils This would also remove impor-tant cross linking sites from the fibrils On the other hand, Saffarian et al [95] reported that active MMP-1 moves to one direction on collagen fibrils analgous to a molecular ratchet, which is driven by proteolysis This directional movement may be explained by the Orgel model of collagen fibrils [93]: upon destabilization or cleavage of the C-telopeptide, collagenase can remove the C-terminal ¼ fragment including the C-telopep-tide, which then exposes the C-terminally adjacent col-lagenase-cleavage site Subsequent cleavage of this site will expose another site on the C-terminal side Such directional movement of the collagenase may promote cells to move in one direction when the enzyme is attached to the cell surface This may also occur with MT-MMPs and MMP-1 attached to Emmprin or a2b1 integrin Cells such as inflammatory cells may use such
a mechanism to move along one direction depending
on the orientation of collagen fibrils In Orgel’s model, the a2b1 integrin-binding site in collagen I is also blocked by the adjacent collagen molecule [96] To make these sites available to the integrins, collagenoly-sis and denaturation of the ¾ fragment is probably necessary Further investigations are necessary to determine how pericellular collagenolysis and integrin engagement are coordinated during the cell movement
on collagen fibrils Those questions may apply to the
Trang 9migration of many cell types, including cancer cells,
inflammatory cells, smooth muscle cells and
endothe-lial cells, as well as the directionality of collagen fibres
in the tissue
Conclusions and future prospects
Subsequent to the discovery of vertebrate collagenase
in the tadpole tail undergoing metamorphosis [97],
MMPs have largely been characterized in relation to
their respective abilities to degrade ECM molecules
However, for the last two decades, researchers have
recognized that non-ECM proteins, such as serpins,
cytokines, chemokines, growth factors and growth
fac-tor-binding proteins, are also MMP substrates [2]
Along with the cryptic function of ECM molecules
exposed by MMP cleavage, these observations
empha-size that MMPs play diverse roles in many cellular
activities, such as proliferation, differentiation,
migra-tion and apoptosis The proteolytic acmigra-tions associated
with these events most effectively occur at or close to
the cell surface Thus, the MT-MMPs have been
regarded as prime candidates in such activities [19]
However, numerous studies have demonstrated that
secreted MMPs are also recruited to the cell surface,
interacting with cell surface receptors or pericellular
macromolecules, including those of the ECM (Table 1)
Such interactions introduce intricate regulatory
mecha-nisms that create gradients or directionality of
prote-olytic activity Of particular note is the role of
interacting proteins in endocytic mechanisms to
down-regulate MMP function Although only a few MMPs
have been so far studied, the diversity of mechanisms
is proving to be enormous These examples have led us
to consider that many, if not all, of the MMPs may
frequently function pericellularly, rather than at sites
distal to the cells, where the communication between
the cells and the surrounding ECM and other bioactive
molecules takes place For example, MMP-19 is
another member found to be associated with myeloid
cell surface, although the binding partner is yet to be
identified [98] Identification of the partner molecule
would help us understand the role of MMP-19 in
blood-derived cell migration Careful
immunocyto-chemical studies of more recently discovered MMPs
certainly deserve further attention, which may help to
elucidate the molecular mechanism of the proposed
function or introduce new biological functions The
use of modern techniques for protein identification will
also further the characterization of proteins that
inter-act with MMPs [99,100] and further define cell surface
focussing and regulation of their function in relation
to specific cellular activities
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all the individuals who have contributed to MMP research and apologize that we have been unable to cite all the relevant studies in this minireview Our work is supported by grants from Cancer Research UK, Medical Research Council, European Union Framework 6 Program to G.M., the Wellcome Trust, Arthritis Research UK and National Institutes of Health (AR40994) to H.N
References
1 Gialeli C, Theocharis AD & Karamanos NK (2010) Metalloproteinases in health and disease: roles of matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression and their pharmacological targeting FEBS J 278, 16–27
2 Murphy G & Nagase H (2008) Progress in matrix metalloproteinase research Mol Aspects Med 29, 290– 308
3 Hadler- Olsen EFB, Sylte I, Uhlin-Hansen L & Winberg J-O (2010) Metalloproteinases in health and disease: regulation of matrix metalloproteinase activity FEBS J 278, 28–45
4 Ra HJ & Parks WC (2007) Control of matrix metalloproteinase catalytic activity Matrix Biol 26, 587–596
5 Nagase H, Visse R & Murphy G (2006) Structure and function of matrix metalloproteinases and TIMPs Cardiovasc Res 69, 562–573
6 Becker JW, Marcy AI, Rokosz LL, Axel MG, Burbaum JJ, Fitzgerald PM, Cameron PM, Esser CK, Hagmann WK, Hermes JD et al (1995) Stromelysin-1: three-dimensional structure of the inhibited catalytic domain and of the C-truncated proenzyme Protein Sci
4, 1966–1976
7 Morgunova E, Tuuttila A, Bergmann U, Isupov M, Lindqvist Y, Schneider G & Tryggvason K (1999) Structure of human pro-matrix metalloproteinase-2: activation mechanism revealed Science 284, 1667– 1670
8 Elkins PA, Ho YS, Smith WW, Janson CA, D’Alessio KJ, McQueney MS, Cummings MD & Romanic AM (2002) Structure of the C-terminally truncated human ProMMP9, a gelatin-binding matrix metalloproteinase Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr
58, 1182–1192
9 Jozic D, Bourenkov G, Lim NH, Visse R, Nagase H, Bode W & Maskos K (2005) X-ray structure of human proMMP-1: new insights into procollagenase
activation and collagen binding J Biol Chem 280, 9578–9585
10 Van Wart HE & Birkedal-Hansen H (1990) The cyste-ine switch: a principle of regulation of metalloprotein-ase activity with potential applicability to the entire
Trang 10matrix metalloproteinase gene family Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA 87, 5578–5582
11 Murphy G, Nguyen Q, Cockett MI, Atkinson SJ,
Allan JA, Knight CG, Willenbrock F & Docherty AJP
(1994) Assessment of the role of the fibronectin-like
domain of gelatinase A by analysis of a deletion
mutant J Biol Chem 269, 6632–6636
12 Shipley JM, Doyle GAR, Fliszar CJ, Ye QZ, Johnson
LL, Shapiro SD, Welgus HG & Senior RM (1996)
The structural basis for the elastolytic activity of the
92-kDa and 72-kDa gelatinases J Biol Chem 271,
4335–4341
13 McQuibban GA, Gong JH, Tam EM, McCulloch CA,
Clark-Lewis I & Overall CM (2000) Inflammation
dampened by gelatinase A cleavage of monocyte
chemoattractant protein-3 Science 289, 1202–1206
14 Chung L, Dinakarpandian D, Yoshida N,
Lauer-Fields JL, Lauer-Fields GB, Visse R & Nagase H (2004)
Collagenase unwinds triple-helical collagen prior to
peptide bond hydrolysis EMBO J 23, 3020–3030
15 Sela-Passwell N, Rosenblum G, Shoham T & Sagi I
(2010) Structural and functional bases for allosteric
control of MMP activities: can it pave the path for
selective inhibition? Biochim Biophys Acta 1803, 29–38
16 Sohail A, Sun Q, Zhao H, Bernardo MM, Cho JA &
Fridman R (2008) MT4-(MMP17) and MT6-MMP
(MMP25), A unique set of membrane-anchored matrix
metalloproteinases: properties and expression in
can-cer Cancer Metastasis Rev 27, 289–302
17 Zucker S, Pei D, Cao J & Lo´pez-Otı´n C (2003)
Mem-brane type-matrix metalloproteinases (MT-MMP)
Curr Top Dev Biol 54, 1–74
18 Itoh Y & Seiki M (2006) MT1-MMP: a potent
modi-fier of pericellular microenvironment J Cell Physiol
206, 1–8
19 Barbolina MV & Stack MS (2008) Membrane type
1-matrix metalloproteinase: substrate diversity in
pericel-lular proteolysis Semin Cell Dev Biol 19, 24–33
20 Kna¨uper V, Bailey L, Worley JR, Soloway P,
Patterson ML & Murphy G (2002) Cellular activation
of proMMP-13 by MT1-MMP depends on the
C-terminal domain of MMP-13 FEBS Lett 532, 127–
130
21 Itoh Y, Ito N, Nagase H, Evans RD, Bird SA & Seiki
M (2006) Cell surface collagenolysis requires
homodi-merization of the membrane-bound collagenase
MT1-MMP Mol Biol Cell 17, 5390–5399
22 Miyamori H, Takino T, Kobayashi Y, Tokai H, Itoh
Y, Seiki M & Sato H (2001) Claudin promotes
activa-tion of pro-matrix metalloproteinase-2 mediated by
membrane-type matrix metalloproteinases J Biol
Chem 276, 28204–28211
23 Sato H, Okada Y & Seiki M (1997) Membrane-type
matrix metalloproteinases (MT-MMPs) in cell
invasion Thromb Haemost 78, 497–500
24 Itoh Y, Takamura A, Ito N, Maru Y, Sato H, Suenaga N, Aoki T & Seiki M (2001) Homophilic complex formation of MT1-MMP facilitates proMMP-2 activation on the cell surface and promotes tumor cell invasion EMBO J 20, 4782–4793
25 Mori H, Tomari T, Koshikawa N, Kajita M, Itoh Y, Sato H, Tojo H, Yana I & Seiki M (2002) CD44 directs membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase to lamellipodia by associating with its hemopexin-like domain EMBO J 21, 3949–3959
26 Artym VV, Zhang Y, Seillier-Moiseiwitsch F, Yamada KM & Mueller SC (2006) Dynamic interac-tions of cortactin and membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase at invadopodia: defining the stages
of invadopodia formation and function Cancer Res
66, 3034–3043
27 Poincloux R, Lizarraga F & Chavrier P (2009) Matrix invasion by tumour cells: a focus on MT1-MMP trafficking to invadopodia J Cell Sci 122, 3015–3024
28 Clark ES & Weaver AM (2008) A new role for cortactin in invadopodia: regulation of protease secretion Eur J Cell Biol
29 Bravo-Cordero JJ, Marrero-Diaz R, Megı´as D, Genı´s
L, Garcı´a-Grande A, Garcı´a MA, Arroyo AG & Montoya MC (2007) MT1-MMP proinvasive activity
is regulated by a novel Rab8-dependent exocytic pathway EMBO J 26, 1499–1510
30 Gingras D, Bousquet-Gagnon N, Langlois S, Lachambre MP, Annabi B & Be´liveau R (2001) Activation of the extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK) cascade by membrane-type-1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) FEBS Lett 507, 231– 236
31 Langlois S, Gingras D & Be´liveau R (2004) Membrane type 1-matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) cooper-ates with sphingosine 1-phosphate to induce endothe-lial cell migration and morphogenic differentiation Blood 103, 3020–3028
32 Lehti K, Valtanen H, Wickstro¨m S, Lohi J &
Keski-Oja J (2000) Regulation of membrane-type-1 matrix metalloproteinase activity by its cytoplasmic domain J Biol Chem 275, 15006–15013
33 Sakamoto T & Seiki M (2009) Cytoplasmic tail of MT1-MMP regulates macrophage motility independently from its protease activity Genes Cells 14, 617–626
34 Li XY, Ota I, Yana I, Sabeh F & Weiss SJ (2008) Molecular dissection of the structural machinery underlying the tissue-invasive activity of membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase Mol Biol Cell 19, 3221–3233
35 Hotary K, Allen E, Punturieri A, Yana I & Weiss SJ (2000) Regulation of cell invasion and morphogenesis
in a three-dimensional type I collagen matrix by membrane-type matrix metalloproteinases 1, 2, and 3
J Cell Biol 149, 1309–1323