1. Trang chủ
  2. » Ngoại Ngữ

AA response to AA2216067 MergerDissolution w Univ Man2 and Amended Edits 10 20 09

4 1 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 4
Dung lượng 77 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Academic Senate ReportAS-2216-067/AA CLARIFICATION OF THE FORMATION, DISSOLUTION, MERGER, OR MOVEMENT OF AN ACADEMIC DEPARTMENT Academic Senate Action: Adopted: Final Disposition: Transm

Trang 1

Academic Senate Report

AS-2216-067/AA

CLARIFICATION OF THE FORMATION, DISSOLUTION, MERGER, OR MOVEMENT

OF AN ACADEMIC DEPARTMENT

Academic Senate Action:

Adopted:

Final Disposition:

Transmitted to President:

Trang 2

In 2006 the Senate Academic Affairs committee submitted a response, AA-2216-067/AA, to the Senate The Senate approved the committee’s recommendation, however, President Ortiz rejected the recommendation saw no need to alter existing policy, FS-153-745/AST, Policy on the Formation, Merger, & Dissolution of Departments, 1975 Please see the

attachments for additional details The Senate Executive Committee sent the President’s response and the recommendation back to the Academic Affairs Committee in 2008 for reconsideration The current policy was developed under two three separate referrals recommendations The aforementioned, FS-153-745/AST is concerned with the

formation, merger and dissolution of departments , and The

recommendation AS-672-878/EPC which eastablished established a procedure

for the discontinuance of programs The policy on discontinuance of

programs was modified in 1992 under President Suzuki to include a policy

on procedures for enrolled students to complete degrees, AS-809-912/AP

The referral AS-672-878/EPC was accepted by President LA Bounty in a memo dated June

8, 1988

Resources

Dr Les Young, Dean, College of Agriculture

Dr David Still, Horticulture/Plant & Soil Sciences

Dr Dan Hostetler, Chair, Horticulture/Plant & Soil Sciences

Dr David Lord, Geography & Anthropology

Dr Claudia Pinter-Lucke, AVP for Undergraduate Studies

Dr Abolhassan Halati, Technology and Operations Management

Discussion

The committee spoke with faculty involved in past cases of department mergers After some discussion it became clear that one issue of concern for the faculty is the definition of

consultation The committee concluded that by clarifying the definition of consultation in the

1975 referral, FS-153-745/AST, the campus will be better served This recommendation is not seeking to change the original policy, only to clarify the definition of consultation and to align the language in accordance with the current University organization The stated

changes are included in the statement of policy on Academic Program Discontinuation and Policy Procedure as given in the University Manual

Recommendation:

CALIFORIA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY, POMONA

POLICY NO: 1501

Trang 3

FORMATION, MERGER AND DISSOLUTION OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AND

DEPARTMENTS Academic Program Discontinuation Policy and Procedure

1.0Policy Guidelines

1 All matters leading to the decisions concerning the formation, merger or dissolution of departments shall be handled on an ad hoc basis with adequate consultation with all concerned parties These include at the minimum the faculty and students of the affected departments, the dean of the affected schools, the Academic Dean’s Council, the faculty Senate, the dean of the Undergraduate and Graduate Studies, the Vice President for Academic Affairs and the President of the University

2. That the definition of adequate consultation be that all parties concerned be informed and consulted on all actions and consideration which will be admitted as the basis for interim and ultimate decisions, with summary of all such information and consultation to be in ywriting, signed and dated

Section 1A: Policy on Formation, Merger, Movement and Dissolution of Academic Departments

The existing policy regarding the formation, merger, or dissolution states that no formal set of procedures should be followed The Academic Senate recommends that the following

statements serve as guidelines for these actionsfor the formation, merger, movement, or dissolution of programs or departments:

1 All matters leading to decisions concerning the formation, merger or dissolution of

departments shall be handled on an ad hoc basis with adequate consultation with all

concerned parties These parties include, at a minimum, the faculty, staff, and students

of affected departments, the Deans of affected colleges, the Academic Deans’ Council, the Academic Senate, the member(s) of the Provost’s staff assigned the duties of deans for undergraduate and graduate studies, the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs, and the President of the University

2 Adequate consultation means that all concerned parties be informed of and given a reasonable amount of time to respond to proposed changes Information provided to concerned parties shall include the following, at a minimum:

a The reasons for the proposed change(s);

b The history of similar proposals/actions involving the same department(s);

c. Anticipated changes to academic programs and associated timeline

(recognizing that the changes themselves would be considered by the established senate process);

d Anticipated impact(s) on the RTP process in general and of faculty below the rank of Full professor in particular

e An analysis of the budget impact of the proposal

Trang 4

3 Records of all such information and consultation should be collected, dated and

retained in the Division of Academic Affairs Additionally, the campus community shall have reasonable access to these records subject to standard confidentiality

constraints

4 The President should report his decision on the proposal and the reasons for making that decision to all concerned parties

Section 1B: Policy on Discontinuance of Programs

Specific Procedures for Merger and Dissolution of Department or Program

Discontinuance Dissolution or Merger Discontinuance of academic programs or

departments may be initiated at any level and is addressed to the Provost and Vice

President for Academic Affairs and Associate Vice President of Academic

Programs in writing with justification for the proposal The Provost sends the proposal

through the College Dean to the Department Chair The department faculty analyze the proposal in terms of potential impact on students, faculty, and resource allocation and

recommend to the Department Chair appending the results of investigation The department will develop a plan whereby affected students can continue with a reasonable course plan leading to their degrees The Chair recommends to the college curriculum committee, and the proposal proceeds in a timely manner through the office of the Dean and Academic

Senate to the President for a decision

Ngày đăng: 21/10/2022, 20:36

🧩 Sản phẩm bạn có thể quan tâm

w