1. Trang chủ
  2. » Ngoại Ngữ

APMR-Clinical-Trials-Recommendations

37 2 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề Medical Rehabilitation: Guidelines to Advance the Field with High-Impact Clinical Trials
Tác giả Marcas M. Bamman, PhD, Gary R. Cutter, PhD, David M. Brienza, PhD, John Chae, MD, Daniel M. Corcos, PhD, Stephanie DeLuca, PhD, Edelle Field-Fote, PT, PhD, Mona N. Fouad, MD, MPH, Catherine E. Lang, PT, PhD, Anne Lindblad, PhD, Robert W. Motl, PhD, Carla G. Perna, CCRA, CCRP, Darcy Reisman, PT, PhD, Kenneth M. Saag, MD, MSc, Sean I. Savitz, MD, Kathryn H. Schmitz, MPH, PhD, Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley, PT, PhD, John Whyte, MD, PhD, Carolee J. Winstein, PT, PhD, Mary E. Michel, PhD
Trường học University of Alabama at Birmingham
Chuyên ngành Rehabilitation Science
Thể loại accepted manuscript
Năm xuất bản 2018
Thành phố Birmingham
Định dạng
Số trang 37
Dung lượng 2,3 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Crawford Research Institute, Shepherd Center, Atlanta, GA 30309 and Division of Physical Therapy, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322; 10Division of Preventive Medicin

Trang 1

Medical Rehabilitation: Guidelines to Advance the Field with High-Impact Clinical

Trials

Marcas M Bamman, PhD, Gary R Cutter, PhD, David M Brienza, PhD, John Chae,

MD, Daniel M Corcos, PhD, Stephanie DeLuca, PhD, Edelle Field-Fote, PT, PhD,

Mona N Fouad, MD, MPH, Catherine E Lang, PT, PhD, Anne Lindblad, PhD, Robert

W Motl, PhD, Carla G Perna, CCRA, CCRP, Darcy Reisman, PT, PhD, Kenneth

M Saag, MD, MSc, Sean I Savitz, MD, Kathryn H Schmitz, MPH, PhD, Jennifer

Stevens-Lapsley, PT, PhD, John Whyte, MD, PhD, Carolee J Winstein, PT, PhD,

Mary E Michel, PhD

PII: S0003-9993(18)31113-4

DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.08.173

Reference: YAPMR 57345

To appear in: ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION

Received Date: 31 December 2017

Revised Date: 11 July 2018

Accepted Date: 15 August 2018

Please cite this article as: Bamman MM, Cutter GR, Brienza DM, Chae J, Corcos DM, DeLuca S,Field-Fote E, Fouad MN, Lang CE, Lindblad A, Motl RW, Perna CG, Reisman D, Saag KM, Savitz SI,Schmitz KH, Stevens-Lapsley J, Whyte J, Winstein CJ, Michel ME, Medical Rehabilitation: Guidelines

to Advance the Field with High-Impact Clinical Trials, ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND

REHABILITATION (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.08.173

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication As a service toour customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript The manuscript will undergocopyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form Pleasenote that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and alllegal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain

Trang 2

Running Head: Rehabilitation Clinical Trial Guidelines

Title: Medical Rehabilitation: Guidelines to Advance the Field with High-Impact Clinical Trials

Marcas M Bamman, PhD1,2,3, Gary R Cutter, PhD1,2,4, David M Brienza, PhD5, John Chae, MD6, Daniel M Corcos, PhD7, Stephanie DeLuca, PhD8, Edelle Field-Fote, PT, PhD9, Mona N Fouad, MD, MPH1,10,

Catherine E Lang, PT, PhD11, Anne Lindblad, PhD12, Robert W Motl, PhD1,2,13, Carla G Perna, CCRA, CCRP1,2, Darcy Reisman, PT, PhD14, Kenneth M Saag, MD, MSc1,15, Sean I Savitz, MD16, Kathryn H Schmitz, MPH, PhD17, Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley, PT, PhD18, John Whyte, MD, PhD19, Carolee J Winstein, PT, PhD20, and Mary E Michel, PhD21

Roanoke, VA 24016; 9Virginia C Crawford Research Institute, Shepherd Center, Atlanta, GA 30309 and Division of Physical Therapy, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322; 10Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine and Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294; 11Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, and Neurology Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63108; 12The Emmes Corporation, Rockville, MD 20850; 13Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at

Trang 3

Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294; 14Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark,

DE 19716; 15Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine and Center for Outcomes and Effectiveness Research and Education, University of Alabama at Birmingham,

Birmingham, AL 35294; 16Department of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston,

TX 77030; 17Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16801; 18Physical Therapy Program, University of Colorado, Denver, CO 80045; 19Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19141; 20Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089; 21National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20847 (retired)

Acknowledgments: We sincerely thank Dr Alison Cernich, Director, and Dr Ralph Nitkin, Program

Official, for their NCMRR leadership, and for their support of the clinical trials workshop summarized in this manuscript Supported in part by NIH Grant P2CHD086851

Conflicts of Interest: The authors disclose the following relationships:

J Chae discloses a relationship with: SPR Therapeutics

G Cutter discloses relationships with: Pythagoras (Board membership), Amo Pharmaceuticals, Teva Neuroscience, EMD Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, AMO, Genzyme, Medimmune, Receptos, Gilead, Sanofi-Aventis, Apotex/Modigenetec, Opko, NHLBI, NICHD, Ono/Merck, Genentech, GSK,

Transparency Life Sciences, Roche, Ophazyme, Somahlution, Horizon Pharma, Reata Pharma, PTC Therapeutics, Klein-Buendel, Merck/Pfizer, UT Houston, Medday, Roche, Sciflour, Axon, and GW Pharmaceuticals

S Savitz discloses relationships via his institution (UTHealth) with: Athersys, Genentech, Pfizer, Dart Neuroscience, SanBio, Let’s Cure CP, the Texas Institute for Rehabilitation and Research Foundation, Cord Blood Registry Systems, Neuralstem, Mesoblast, BlueRock, ReNeuron, Lumosa, Celgene, Dart Neuroscience, and Aldagen

Word Counts: Main Text = 6159; Online Appendix = 2242

Address for Correspondence: Marcas M Bamman, PhD, UAB Center for Exercise Medicine, 1313 13th

Street South, Room 300, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35205-5327

Phone 205-975-9042, mbamman@uab.edu

Trang 25

1 Simon R, Maitournam A Evaluating the Efficiency of Targeted Designs for Randomized Clinical

Trials Clinical Cancer Research 2004;10(20):6759-6763

2 Cutter G, Kappos L Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis Handbook of clinical neurology

5 Gomes-Osman J, Cortes M, Guest J, Pascual-Leone A A Systematic Review of Experimental

Strategies Aimed at Improving Motor Function after Acute and Chronic Spinal Cord Injury

Journal of neurotrauma 2016;33(5):425-438

6 Constantini S, Young W The effects of methylprednisolone and the ganglioside GM1 on acute

spinal cord injury in rats Journal of neurosurgery 1994;80(1):97-111

7 Geisler FH, Dorsey FC, Coleman WP Recovery of motor function after spinal-cord injury a

randomized, placebo-controlled trial with GM-1 ganglioside N Engl J Med

1991;324(26):1829-1838

8 Backman CL, Harris SR Case studies, single-subject research, and N of 1 randomized trials:

comparisons and contrasts American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation

1999;78(2):170-176

9 Senn S Are placebo run ins justified? BMJ 1997;314(7088):1191

10 Senn S, Lee S The analysis of the AB/BA cross-over trial in the medical literature

Pharmaceutical Statistics 2004;3(2):123-131

11 Sackett DL HR, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P Clinical Epidemiology: A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine

2nd ed: Little, Brown & Co; 1991

12 P O Single case designs In: Everitt BS HD, ed Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science

Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2005

13 Hawkins NG, Sanson-Fisher RW, Shakeshaft A, D'Este C, Green LW The multiple baseline design

for evaluating population-based research American journal of preventive medicine

2007;33(2):162-168

14 Center for Information and Study on Clinical Research www.ciscrp.org Accessed February 8,

2017

15 DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG, Hansen RW Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New

estimates of R&D costs Journal of health economics 2016;47:20-33

16 Institute of M Envisioning a Transformed Clinical Trials Enterprise in the United States:

Establishing an Agenda for 2020: Workshop Summary Washington, DC: The National Academies

Press; 2012

17 Sherman RE, Anderson SA, Dal Pan GJ, et al Real-World Evidence — What Is It and What Can It

Tell Us? New England Journal of Medicine 2016;375(23):2293-2297

18 Schwartz D, Lellouch J Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials J Chronic Dis

1967;20(8):637-648

19 Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Wagner EH Clinical Epidemiology - the Essentials 2nd ed Baltimore,

MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1988

20 Pincus T, Sokka T Clinical trials in rheumatic diseases: designs and limitations Rheum Dis Clin

North Am 2004;30(4):701-724, v-vi

21 Eapen ZJ, Lauer MS, Temple RJ The imperative of overcoming barriers to the conduct of large,

simple trials JAMA 2014;311(14):1397-1398

Trang 26

22 US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug

Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Determining the Extent

of Safety Data Collection Needed in Late-Stage Premarket and Postapproval Clinical

Investigations - Guidance for Industry 2016;

http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidances/ucm291158.pdf Accessed February 8, 2017

23 Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M, Oxman AD, et al A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator

summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62(5):464-475

24 Loudon K, Treweek S, Sullivan F, Donnan P, Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M The PRECIS-2 tool:

designing trials that are fit for purpose BMJ 2015;350:h2147

25 Saag KG, Mohr PE, Esmail L, et al Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of pragmatic clinical

trials in older adults in the United States Contemp Clin Trials 2012;33(6):1211-1216

26 Organization WH International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health 2001;

http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/

27 Hart T, Ehde DM Defining the treatment targets and active ingredients of rehabilitation:

Implications for rehabilitation psychology Rehabil Psychol 2015;60(2):126-135

28 VanHiel LR Treatment and enablement in rehabilitation research Archives of physical medicine

and rehabilitation 2014;95(1 Suppl):S88-90

29 Whyte J Contributions of treatment theory and enablement theory to rehabilitation research

and practice Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2014;95(1 Suppl):S17-23 e12

30 Whyte J, Dijkers MP, Hart T, et al Development of a theory-driven rehabilitation treatment

taxonomy: conceptual issues Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2014;95(1

Suppl):S24-32 e22

31 Bamman MM, Petrella JK, Kim JS, Mayhew DL, Cross JM Cluster analysis tests the importance of

myogenic gene expression during myofiber hypertrophy in humans J Appl Physiol (1985)

2007;102(6):2232-2239

32 Mayhew DL, Hornberger TA, Lincoln HC, Bamman MM Eukaryotic initiation factor 2B epsilon

induces cap-dependent translation and skeletal muscle hypertrophy The Journal of physiology

2011;589(Pt 12):3023-3037

33 Petrella JK, Kim JS, Mayhew DL, Cross JM, Bamman MM Potent myofiber hypertrophy during

resistance training in humans is associated with satellite cell-mediated myonuclear addition: a

cluster analysis Journal of applied physiology 2008;104(6):1736-1742

34 Stec MJ, Kelly NA, Many GM, Windham ST, Tuggle SC, Bamman MM Ribosome biogenesis may

augment resistance training-induced myofiber hypertrophy and is required for myotube growth

in vitro American journal of physiology Endocrinology and metabolism 2016:ajpendo 00486

02015

35 Thalacker-Mercer A, Stec M, Cui X, Cross J, Windham S, Bamman M Cluster analysis reveals

differential transcript profiles associated with resistance training-induced human skeletal muscle

hypertrophy Physiol Genomics 2013;45(12):499-507

36 Stec MJ, Thalacker-Mercer A, Mayhew DL, et al Randomized, four-arm, dose-response clinical

trial to optimize resistance exercise training for older adults with age-related muscle atrophy

Exp Gerontol 2017;99:98-109

37 Long DE, Peck BD, Martz JL, et al Metformin to Augment Strength Training Effective Response in

Seniors (MASTERS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Trials 2017;18(1):192

38 Knutson JS, Gunzler DD, Wilson RD, Chae J Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical

Stimulation Improves Hand Dexterity in Chronic Hemiparesis: A Randomized Trial Stroke

2016;47(10):2596-2602

39 Kelly NA, Ford MP, Standaert DG, et al Novel, high-intensity exercise prescription improves

muscle mass, mitochondrial function, and physical capacity in individuals with Parkinson's

Trang 27

disease Journal of applied physiology 2014;116(5):582-592

40 Corcos DM, Robichaud JA, David FJ, et al A two-year randomized controlled trial of progressive

resistance exercise for Parkinson's disease Mov Disord 2013;28(9):1230-1240

41 McDonald AM, Knight RC, Campbell MK, et al What influences recruitment to randomised

controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies Trials 2006;7:9

42 Kadam RA, Borde SU, Madas SA, Salvi SS, Limaye SS Challenges in recruitment and retention of

clinical trial subjects Perspect Clin Res 2016;7(3):137-143

43 Frank G Current Challenges In Clinical Trial Patient Recruitment and Enrollment SOCRA Source

2004;2(February):9

44 Shalowitz DI, Miller FG Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: attitudes,

practices, and future directions PLoS Med 2008;5(5):e91

45 Caldwell PH, Hamilton S, Tan A, Craig JC Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomised

controlled trials: systematic review PLoS Med 2010;7(11):e1000368

46 Fouad MN, Acemgil A, Bae S, et al Patient Navigation As a Model to Increase Participation of

African Americans in Cancer Clinical Trials Journal of Oncology Practice 2016;12(6):556-563

47 Fouad MN, Acemgil A, Bae S, et al Patient Navigation As a Model to Increase Participation of

African Americans in Cancer Clinical Trials J Oncol Pract 2016;12(6):556-563

48 Lai B, Young HJ, Bickel CS, Motl RW, Rimmer JH Current Trends in Exercise Intervention

Research, Technology, and Behavioral Change Strategies for People With Disabilities: A Scoping

Review American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation 2017;96(10):748-761

49 Larkin L, Kennedy N, Gallagher S Promoting physical activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a narrative

review of behaviour change theories Disabil Rehabil 2015;37(25):2359-2366

50 Ellis T, Motl RW Physical activity behavior change in persons with neurologic disorders:

overview and examples from Parkinson disease and multiple sclerosis Journal of neurologic

physical therapy : JNPT 2013;37(2):85-90

51 Adamson BC, Learmonth YC, Kinnett-Hopkins D, Bohri M, Motl RW Feasibility study design and

methods for Project GEMS: Guidelines for Exercise in Multiple Sclerosis Contemp Clin Trials

2016;47:32-39

52 Learmonth YC, Adamson, B C., Kinnett-Hopkins, D., Bohri, M., & Motl, R W Results of a

feasibility randomized controlled study of the guidelines for exercise in multiple sclerosis

project Contemporary Clinical Trials In Press

53 Beidas RS, Paciotti B, Barg F, et al A hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of an

evidence-based exercise intervention for breast cancer survivors Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Monographs 2014;2014(50):338-345

54 Schmitz KH, Ahmed RL, Troxel A, et al Weight lifting in women with breast-cancer-related

lymphedema N Engl J Med 2009;361(7):664-673

55 Schmitz KH, Ahmed RL, Troxel AB, et al Weight lifting for women at risk for breast

cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized trial Jama 2010;304(24):2699-2705

Ngày đăng: 21/10/2022, 19:54

Nguồn tham khảo

Tài liệu tham khảo Loại Chi tiết
4. Treweek S, Zwarenstein M. Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability. Trials. 2009;10(1):37 Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: Trials
5. Ehde DM, Wegener ST, Williams RM, et al. Developing, testing, and sustaining rehabilitation interventions via participatory action research. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.2013;94(1 Suppl):S30-42 Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
6. Williams GC, Grow VM, Freedman ZR, Ryan RM, Deci EL. Motivational predictors of weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1996;70(1):115-126 Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: Journal of personality and social psychology
7. Chan DK, Lonsdale C, Ho PY, Yung PS, Chan KM. Patient Motivation and Adherence to Postsurgery Rehabilitation Exercise Recommendations: The Influence of Physiotherapists' Autonomy-Supportive Behaviors. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.2009;90(12):1977-1982 Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
8. Collins FS, Tabak LA. Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility. Nature. 2014;505(7485):612- 613 Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: Nature
9. Department of Health and Human Services. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Federal Register. 2015;80(173):53933-54061 Sách, tạp chí
Tiêu đề: Federal Register
2. Society of Clinical Research Associates (SOCRA). https://www.socra.org/ Link
3. Association of Clnical Research Professionals. https://www.acrpnet.org/ Link
10. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. NCATS SMART IRB Reliance Platform. https://ncats.nih.gov/expertise/clinical/smartirb. Accessed February 8, 2017 Link
1. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). www.ich.org/ Khác
w