Using qualitative methods alongside trials of complex interventions Introduction Mixed methods, which include the use of qualitative methods alongside randomised control trials of comple
Trang 1Using qualitative methods alongside trials of complex interventions
Introduction
Mixed methods, which include the use of qualitative methods alongside randomised control trials of complex interventions, are increasingly recognised as adding value to research studies 1-3 Despite increased interest, currently, UK funding bodies do not offer specific guidance to applicants on how to present a proposal for qualitative research within an application for trial funding 4 This short document summarises the benefits of including a qualitative component in an application for trial funding and offers a checklist for researchers on what to include in a proposal
What can qualitative research add to an RCT?
There are a wide range of reasons for and benefits of using qualitative methods alongside RCTs, before, during and after a trial (see Box 1 below) 1
A recent systematic mapping review of qualitative research undertaken with RCTs and published in peer-reviewed journals found that the temporal categories identified
by Lewin and colleagues were in practice often more blurred (for example, it was hard to distinguish between ‘during a trial’ and ‘after a trial’), and the authors propose
an alternative (but overlapping) framework for conceptualising the focus of qualitative research undertaken alongside trials (see Box 2) 2
BOX 1: Ways in which qualitative methods can be used alongside randomised control trials
Before a trial
To explore issues related to the healthcare question of interest or context of the research
To generate hypotheses for examination in the randomised controlled trial
To develop and refine the intervention
To develop or select appropriate outcome measures
During a trial
To examine whether the intervention was delivered as intended, including
describing the intervention as delivered
To “unpack” processes of implementation and change
To explore deliverers’ and recipients’ responses to the intervention
Trang 2After a trial
To explore reasons for the findings of the trial
To explain variations in effectiveness within the sample
To examine the appropriateness of the underlying theory
To generate further questions or hypotheses
Source: 1
Box 2: Framework for conceptualising the contribution of qualitative research
to RCTs
Intervention content and delivery
Pretrial development work relating to intervention content and delivery
Exploring individual components of a complex intervention as delivered in a specific trial
Developing models, mechanisms of action and underlying theories or concepts relating to an intervention in the context of a specific trial
Exploring accounts of perceived value and benefits of intervention given by recipients and providers of the intervention
Exploring stakeholder perceptions of the ‘in principle’ acceptability of an
intervention
Exploring stakeholder perceptions of the feasibility and acceptability of an
intervention in practice
Describing the fidelity, reach and dose of an intervention as delivered in a specific trial
Identifying lessons for ‘real world’ implementation based on delivery of the
intervention in the trial
Trial design; conduct and processes
Identifying ways of increasing recruitment and retention
Identifying ways of broadening participation in a trial to improve diversity of
population
Improving understanding of how participants join trials and experience of
participation
Exploring stakeholders’ views of acceptability of a trial design
Exploring stakeholders’ views of acceptability of a trial design in practice
Strengthening the ethical conduct of a trial, for example, informed consent
procedures
Addressing local issues which may impact on the feasibility of a trial
Understanding how the trial affects different stakeholders, for example, workload
2
Trang 3(NB See also RDS guidance of fidelity assessment, an emerging field of research)
Outcomes
Identifies the range of outcomes important to participants in the trial
Explains differences in outcomes between clusters or participants in a trial
Measures of process and outcome
Assesses validity of process and outcome measures in the trial
Explores why participants complete measures or not
Incorporating into a proposal
Contributes to the development of a new process and secondary outcome
measures
Target condition
Explores the experience of having or treating a condition that the intervention is aimed at, or a related behaviour or belief
Source: adapted from 2
O’Caithin and colleagues cite specific studies they reviewed, giving examples of each of the above categories of focus, and providing illustrations of the type of
qualitative research methods and findings in each case 2
Tips for researchers on writing proposals for qualitative research undertaken alongside a trial
As part of an MRC study on maximising the value of qualitative research in trials, Drabble et al undertook a documentary analysis of trial proposals that included qualitative research and were successfully funded by NIHR, MRC and Wellcome From their analysis they offer guidance on good practice for researchers considering
a qualitative component to their study This guidance is summarised in Table 1 4
Table 1: Guidance on writing proposals for qualitative research
Aim Describe the aim of the qualitative research Where appropriate
identify aims specific to the trial e.g ‘to explore patient views on adherence to the trial intervention’ rather than using general aims e.g ‘to explore patient experiences’.
Rationale Describe the rationale for including qualitative research; identify
areas of uncertainty to be explored Include a statement addressing the ways in which the aims of the qualitative
Trang 4research will ‘add value’ to the trial.
Methods Provide a clear account of the proposed methods of data
collection including the location and timing of data collection, and the skills and seniority of the person who will undertake data collection
Describe the sample frame, sampling method(s), and sample size Where the sample frame is trial participants, specify whether intervention, control or both will be included
Describe and reference the proposed approach to analysis A rationale for the approach to be taken may be included
Identify the qualitative research skills and seniority of the person who will undertake the analysis and write-up
Integration
with trial
Outline suggestions for integrating and synthesising qualitative data / findings with the trial results
Cost Describe the full costs of the qualitative research and highlight
any dedicated equipment, software, staff, and transcription costs
Leadership Identify which of the co-applicants will take overall responsibility
for the qualitative research and describe their role in the design, data collection, analysis and write-up of the study
Conclusion
This short document has outlined the various benefits of including qualitative
methods in a trial study proposal A number of Research Design Service advisers have expertise and experience in mixed methods study and can support applicants
in developing their research proposal
Jill Russell
Research Design Service London
Queen Mary University of London
March 2014
References
1 Lewin S, Glenton C, Oxman AD Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex
healthcare interventions: methodological study BMJ 2009;339(sep10 1):b3496 doi:
10.1136/bmj.b3496
2 O'Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Drabble SJ, et al What can qualitative research do for randomised controlled trials?
A systematic mapping review BMJ Open 2013;3(6) doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002889
3 O'Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services
research in England: a mixed methods study BMC Health Serv Res 2007;7:85 doi:
10.1186/1472-6963-7-85
4 Drabble SJ, O'Cathain A, Thomas KJ, et al Describing qualitative research undertaken with randomised
controlled trials in grant proposals: a documentary analysis BMC Med Res Methodol 2014;14:24 doi:
10.1186/1471-2288-14-24
4